Home  

Doctors convicted of Bogota baby trafficking

FRIDAY, 04 MARCH 2011 13:52 HANNAH ARONOWITZ
A doctor and a psychologist were sentenced to nine years and six months in prison for selling babies in Bogota, Colombia, newspaper El Tiempo reported Friday.
Doctor Erber Jose Ochoa and psychologist Elsy Marina de Guadalupe Perez accepted the charges of trafficking and conspiracy in a plea bargain with the prosecution. In addition to almost a decade of jail time they will pay a fine of 533 times an monthly minimum wage.
Adenis Delgado Aguirre, who was also involved in the criminal scheme, was sentenced to seven years and five months in prison and will pay 433 times the monthly minimum wage.
The three worked a Bogota health clinic called Ecomarly which apparently urged women to keep their babies instead of aborting them in order to sell the infants on. Investigations also concluded that they had told women that their babies had died in childbirth and then trafficked the newborns.
The trio were implicated in recordings of their conversations in which they offered babies for sale, and were arrested eight months ago.
In 2009 police captured two women and a man who were stealing babies with the intent to sell them in Bogota's Las Cruces neighborhood.

Ethiopia moves to sharply reduce foreign adoptions

Ethiopia moves to sharply reduce foreign adoptions

By DAVID CRARY
The Associated Press 
Thursday, March 10, 2011; 2:33 PM

 

NEW YORK -- Ethiopia, which has become the No. 2 source country for children adopted by Americans, implemented changes Thursday that could reduce the number of foreign adoptions by up to 90 percent, the State Department said.

U.S. adoption agencies reacted with dismay, and launched a petition drive urging Ethiopia to reconsider. The State Department warned that pending applications to adopt from Ethiopia could encounter "significant delays" of perhaps six months or more.

The new policy, intended to reduce instances of fraud and ease a heavy workload at Ethiopia's youth ministry, marks a dramatic turnaround for a country that - in the eyes of adoption advocates in the U.S. - had been a rare international bright spot in recent years.

According to State Department figures, 2,513 Ethiopian children were adopted by Americans in the 2010 fiscal year, second only to China as a source country. Ethiopia had been one of the few nations to significantly increase adoptions to the U.S. at a time when overall foreign adoptions by Americans were dropping by 50 percent from the peak of 22,884 in 2004.

Although U.S. adoption advocates had been concerned about adoption fraud in Ethiopia, several of them described the policy change as an overreaction that had caught them by surprise.

The plan "is a tragic, unnecessary and disproportionate reaction to concerns of isolated abuses," said the Joint Council on International Children's Services, which represents many U.S. adoption agencies.

The council's president, Tom DeFilipo, said he remained hopeful that the policy might be reversed or modified so that adoptions could proceed at a substantial level while undergoing greater scrutiny.

According to the State Department, Ethiopia's new policy calls for its Ministry of Women, Children and Youth Affairs to process no more than five adoption cases per day - about 10 percent of the caseload it had been handling.

Chuck Johnson, CEO of the National Council for Adoption, said Ethiopia has been making "significant progress" in improving its adoption process. He said State Department officials and adoption experts from various countries were trying to persuade Ethiopia to scrap or soften the new policy while seeking further improvements.

"We are encouraged by the advocacy taking place behind the scenes and hopeful that these collective efforts will bring clarity and an immediate adjustment to this unjust and unnecessary ruling," Johnson said.

The State Department said the U.S. government, other foreign countries and several non-governmental organizations had been offering to assist Ethiopia in further upgrading of its adoption and child-welfare systems.

In all, more than 4,000 Ethiopian children were adopted by foreigners last year, with the U.S. the largest destination but large numbers also going to several Western European countries.

Adoption advocates said the new policy would result in thousands of Ethiopian children languishing for longer periods in institutions struggling to provide adequate services for them. In all, the impoverished African country has an estimated 5 million orphans and homeless children.

---

Romania detains two Italians for child trafficking

Romania detains two Italians for child trafficking

10 March 2011 | 14:06 | FOCUS News Agency
Home / Southeast Europe and Balkans
Bucharest. Romanian authorities have detained two Italians for child smuggling and using a false identity after they allegedly tried to illegally take a Romanian newborn to Italy, prosecutors said Thursday, AFP informs.
The two, a 45-year-old woman and a 57-year-old man, were detained late Tuesday in the central city of Brasov.
The Italians allegedly reached an agreement earlier this month with a nine-month-pregnant Romanian woman to register her baby under their names at birth, so they could leave the country with the newborn.
The Romanian gave birth in a private clinic in the eastern city of Bacau, where she was registered under the name of the Italian woman, local prosecutors said.
Prosecutors have asked for the Italians to be held in pre-trial detention for 29 days. A court will decide on the request later Thursday.

Parliament approves motion on adoption laws

Thursday, 10 March, 2011, 14:27

Parliament approves motion on adoption laws


Parliament approved a motion to make it easier for couples to adopt, and for parents who put their children up for adoption to know their identities once they are adults.

The motion has been approved by both the National Council and the Council of States.

Main changes include the required minimum age of adoptive parents and the amount of time they have been living together—both have been reduced.

The couple would also not have to be married.

The motion also lets biological parents know the identity of their children once they are adults and if the children agree to it.

At the moment adopted children have the right to know the who their biological parents are, but not the other way round.

Romanian Govt Reduces Length Of Adoption Procedures

Romanian Govt Reduces Length Of Adoption Procedures

The Romanian Government on Wednesday decided to reduce the length of child adoption procedures. 

Romanian Govt Reduces Length Of Adoption Procedures

The Government decided that children whose biological parents are unknown can be adopted 30 days after birth certificates are issued, and children under state protection can be adopted after an interval of one year during which parents showed no sign of being interested in their children's situation.

Government spokeswoman Ioana Muntean said the Executive did not amend laws regulating international adoptions.

Adop?ia, na?ional? sau interna?ional??

Duminic?, 23 Ianuarie 2011. 968 vizualiz?ri76 comentarii, 10 voturi
Adop?ia, na?ional? sau interna?ional??
Autor: Oana Cr?ciun
Miercuri, Parlamentul European a adoptat o rezolu?ie prin care a transmis statelor europene un mesaj clar de încurajare a adop?iilor, atât na?ionale cât ?i interna?ionale, astfel încât copiii abandona?i s? creasc? în familii, nu în centre.
Rezolu?ia vine ca urmare a unei peti?ii venite din partea italienilor, care cereau în mod explicit deblocarea adop?iilor interna?ionale pentru a putea adopta ?i copii din România. Asta, în condi?iile în care România a interzis, înc? din 2003-2004, înainte de aplicarea legii adop?iei, posibilitatea ca str?inii s? mai înfieze copii români p?r?si?i de p?rin?i.

În timp ce câteva state europene, ca ?i Statele Unite ale Americii, duc un lobby puternic în ultimii ani pentru deblocarea adop?iilor interna?ionale, autorit??ile române sus?in c?, cel pu?in deocamdat?, locul orfanilor români este într-o familie autohton?, aici în România.

Europa încurajeaz? adop?ia în locul centrelor

De altfel, aceast? rezolu?ie nu oblig? în niciun fel România s? dea drumul la adop?iile interna?ionale, ba chiar încurajeaz? adop?ia na?ional?, lasând totu?i la latitudinea fiec?rui stat european s?-?i stabileasc? tipul de adop?ie ales. Scopul este ca micu?ii abandona?i s? ajung? într-o familie, ca s? nu mai stea în centre.

„Aceasta este una dintre nout??ile aduse de rezolu?ie, având în vedere c? pân? acum adop?ia era v?zut? ca ultima solu?ie în cazul copiilor abandona?i ?i nu institu?ionalizarea. Acum raportul s-a schimbat, iar adop?ia, na?ional? sau interna?ional?, în func?ie de legisla?ia fiec?rui stat, este pus? aproape pe acela?i plan cu familia natural?”, sus?ine Bogdan Panait, ?eful Oficiului Român pentru Adop?ii (ORA).

Panait a explicat c? înc? nu se pune problema debloc?rii adop?iilor interna?ionale, acesta fiind punctul de vedere al executivului în acest moment, mai ales c? în România înc? sunt peste o mie de familii atestate care ar vrea s? înfieze copii români, iar num?rul adop?iilor este înc? sc?zut, undeva în jur de 1.000, anul trecut. 

O familie pentru copil ?i economie pentru stat

Potrivit oficialului, în România, în sistemul de protec?ie social? se afl? aproape 70.000 de copii, iar „adoptarea a 2.000 de copii anual ar presupune, pe lâng? beneficiile copiilor, ?i o economie de aproximativ 10 milioane de euro la bugetul de stat”. 

Ceea ce încearc? acum autorit??ile s? fac?, printr-un proiect de modificare a legii adop?iei, este s? reduc? durata procesului de adop?ie ?i mai ales birocra?ia. În plus, se prevede ?i o relaxare în ceea ce prive?te adop?ia interna?ional?, în ideea c? ?i cet??enii români stabili?i în str?in?tate vor putea înfia un copil român.

Unde crede?i c? ar trebui s? creasc? ace?ti copii abandona?i, într-o familie din România sau în str?in?tate? 

WikiLeaks runs first confidential cable wire from Romania on adoption cases

WikiLeaks runs first confidential cable wire from Romania on adoption cases


WikiLeaks has published the first confidential document sent from the US Embassy in Bucharest to the US. The document, sent in 2006 by the then US Ambassador to Bucharest Nicholas Taubman refers to adoption cases. “On April 5, Embassy received by mail a letter from Theodora Bertzi, Secretary of State for the Government of Romania,s (GOR) Romanian Office for Adoptions (ROA), dated March 29 and including the final report of the GOR Working Group established in June 2005 to audit pending petitions by foreign families to adopt Romanian orphans and abandoned children,” writes the document. “‘The report shows that none of the 1,092 children identified in the pending petitions will be available for inter-country adoption, ostensibly for the following reasons,” the document goes on, further mentioning the reasons.

The Working Group had been expected to issue its report by the end of March, and Bertzi had announced publicly in December 2005 that none of the cases would be approved for inter-country adoption. However, the utterly non-transparent process of the Working Group and the opaque  quality of the report suggest some of the children may in fact remain in non-permanent situations in which their welfare is not being adequately protected. Post believes we should continue to press the GOR to open up the Working Group’s “conclusions” for a transparent, objective international review and to establish a legal framework that would allow inter-country adoption for appropriate pending  cases. We will provide Department with our updated recommendations soon,” ends the message.

Secret messages between the US Embassy in Romania and the US state were included in the 250,000 messages sent by American diplomats and recently revealed on WikiLeaks. The US Embassy in Bucharest sent around 775 secret messages to US, according to WikiLeaks. However, the US Embassy to Bucharest has recently said in a statement that by its very nature, field reporting to Washington is candid and often raw information, preliminary and often incomplete, not an expression of policy, and nor does it always shape final policy decisions.

WikiLeaks is a not-for-profit media organization, a project of the Sunshine Press, founded by Julian Assange. “Our goal is to bring important news and information to the public. We provide an innovative, secure and anonymous way for sources to leak information to our journalists (our electronic drop box). One of our most important activities is to publish original source material alongside our news stories so readers and historians alike can see evidence of the truth,” writes the company.

editor@romania-insider.com

Related posts:

  1. Wednesday headlines: RCS & RDS launches TV station, Romania gets 2% of allotted EU funds, WikiLeaks paves way for Obama critics
  2. US Embassy to Bucharest responds to WikiLeaks messages: field reporting doesn’t always shape final policy decisions
  3. Messages sent from Romania, included in recent WikiLeaks documents
  4. Romania ranks fifth in top of spam source countries – Panda Security report
  5. Constitutional challenges no longer suspend lawsuits; future corruption cases unlocked

preet mandir; Chargesheet accuses trustees, CARA official of connivance

By Ishfaq Naseem, 09/03/2011

 
Unwed women made to deliver babies for foreign adoptions: CBI

preet mandir; Chargesheet accuses trustees, CARA official of connivance

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), in a chargesheet filed before Special Judge S N Sardesai on Tuesday, accused adoption agency Preet Mandir of making unwed women deliver children for adoptions by foreign nationals at huge sums of money. The agency also blamed former managing trustee Joginder Singh Bhasin, Central Adoption Research Agency (CARA) former chairman Jainendra Kumar Mittal and four other people, including trustees of the agency, of official connivance in faking rejection slips from Indian parents to make way for foreign adoptions.

The chargesheet said the agency had booked a suite for Mittal at Hotel Aurora Towers when he came on an official inspection of adoption agencies in 2007 besides footing the bill for his stay. It said the agency had also bargained for a discount on the Rs 11,000-room tariff when he came along with CARA deputy director B K Sahu and accounts officer Sushil Kumar Gupta. Of the total bill of Rs 16,361 between June 7 and June 9, 2007, Preet Mandir had paid Rs 5,361 while the rest was paid by Mittal. The official had, meanwhile, taken a travelling allowance advance from the agency for the tour.

It said Mittal had also, during his stay at Hotel Royal Inn, Mumbai, in 2010, received a packet of Rs 50,000 from one Pramod Magar, social worker at Preet Mandir, deputed by Bhasin to deliver the money. The CBI said Mittal had received the delivery through one of the hotel staffers.

The chargesheet said Preet Mandir, which had opened a unit ? Sai Dham at Tal Maval ? for training and rehabilitation of unwed women, used to make them deliver babies who were later raised at another of its unit for adoptions. The unit was, however, admitting pregnant women only. It executed 69 surrender deeds with unwed women and their children were admitted to Unit I and II of Preet Mandir. The chargesheet also said the unit was used only for procurement of children and the women were made to deliver babies at private hospitals like KEM Hospital and Ashiwbad Hospital at Talegaon.

The trustees have been accused of violating guidelines by procuring false rejection slips from Indian parents in violation of the provision that only those children who can't be sent for in-country adoption can be given for inter-country adoption. Some Indian parents had denied signing on such slips during investigation. Former managing trustee Bhasin has been accused of being actively involved in the practice besides using the trust money for his personal benefits.

The CBI has also accused the trust of kidnapping some boys and colluding with an official of Navrange Balak Ashram, Pandharpur, to convince the poor to send their children to the agency and later deny the parents custody of their children. It said many foreign adoptive parents were made to donate up to $10,000 instead of the CARA-stipulated adoption fee of $3500.

An official of Preet Mandir said Bhasin has resigned as managing trustee after the CBI case and the agency did not do any inter-country adoptions now.

IndianExpress

CBI files chargesheet in Preet Mandir case

CBI files chargesheet in Preet Mandir case
It contains names of 114 witnesses, 168 documents against accused

Vijay Chavan
Posted On Wednesday, March 09, 2011 at 06:03:07 AM

The Special Crime Branch of the CBI on Tuesday filed an 87-page chargesheet against six accused including trustees of Preet Mandir and then chairman of Child Adoption Resource Agency (CARA) for their alleged involvement in illegal child procurement racket and extorting money from the parents.

The chargesheet filed by CBI contains 114 witnesses’ names and 168 documents describing the depth of crime and conspiracy.

Inspector S Bhattacharya, of CBI (Mumbai), who is an investigating officer, filed the charge sheet through lawyer Vivek Saxena in the court of Special Judge S N Sardesai.

Managing Trustee of Balwant Kartar Anand Foundation alias Preet Mandir, Joginder Singh Bhasin (72), his trustee wife Mahinder (68) and son Gurpreet (42), Vasudev Gangadhar Darshane (60) who is superintendent of Vasudev Babaji Navrange Balak Ashram in Pandharpur, then social worker with Preet Mandir, Kalyani Nagar, Chandrashekhar Admane (39) and then Chairman of CARA, New Delhi, Jainendra Kumar Mittal (55) are the names mentioned in the chargesheet as accused in this case.

According to the chargesheet, the investigation has revealed that during the period of 2002-10, Joginder Singh had entered into criminal conspiracy with Mahinder, Gurupreet, Darshane, Admane, Mittal and collected children from all over the state with a motive to send them for in-country and inter-country adoption to extort huge money from adoptive parents.

Preet Mandir orphanage
Preet Mandir-I, located in the Camp area and Preet Mandir–II at Kalyani Nagar were orphanage centres while Sai Dham was a rehabilitation centre for distressed women.

The chargesheet further stated, “Joginder was also in illegal procurement of children and for this purpose, he opened a rehabilitation centre, Sai Dham, at Kanhe Phata, near Pune in 2004.

Joginder, Darshane and Admane had fraudulently kidnapped four children of Ramesh Dattatray Kulkarni, fabricated documents and illegally confined the four minors and then sent them in inter-country adoption.
Joginder had fraudulently obtained rejection slips from Indian parents and then forged these rejection slips with a motive to use these slips to send children in inter-country adoption.”

As part of the investigation, CBI probed some 70 in-country and five inter-country adoption cases of Preet Mandir. The charges say that trustees had allegedly misappropriated trust’s fund to the tune of over Rs 47 lakh.

Preet Mandir has six accounts, five saving accounts and one Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) account to collect foreign remittances, with Union Bank of India, Camp branch.

Joginder is common signatory for all accounts. Joginder extorted money from Indian parents for adoption in the form of donation before handing over the adopted child.

All three family members of Joginder had misappropriated the orphanage funds for their own use during 2002-10 by availing payment of credit card bills raised due to use of their credit cards issued in personal names.

The more interesting fact mentioned in the chargesheet is that Joginder had vastly misappropriated the trust’s fund for luxury goods, air travel and stay in five-star hotels.

CARA’s then chairman Mittal habitually accepted considerations from Joginder with whom he was having official dealings.

CARA being the central authority which is functioning as the nodal body in the country in the matter of adoption. Special judge S N Sardesai announced the next date of hearing is on April 8.

Modus operandi

Talking to Pune Mirror, an investigating officer said Singh would enable prospective parents to visit Preet Mandir.

Subsequently, the meeting was organised, the couple would show interest in a particular child and Joginder would hand over the child to prospective parents with or without agreement for foster care and once the bonding is cemented between the couple and the child, he would make unreasonable demand of donations running into a few lakhs rupees upto US$10,000.

Charges on scammers

Joginder is already out on bail in this case while other accused are out on anticipatory bail since October. All six accused in Preet Mandir case have been charged under Section 420 (cheating), Section 120B (criminal conspiracy) and Section 467 (forgery).

The accused have also been charged under sections 13(2) and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.