Mail new Director - ref: meeting with AD 18 September 2017

2 October 2017

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: "Zwaga, Froukje"

Date: 2 Oct 2017 18:34

Subject: FW: To Director: meeting minutes

To: "info@againstchildtrafficking.org"

Cc:

Dear Arun,

It was good meeting you. Thank you for the notes. They give an elaborate overview of what we discussed. However it is entirely from your point of view and as such can not be minutes of our meeting. They will be useful as a point of reference if and when needed.

I will let you know in due course about the numbers of cases Sulu has solved.

Kind regards,

Froukje Zwaga

Director

wklogo

T: 31 (0)70 - 350 66 99

M:31(0)6 137 635 50

E-mail: zwaga@wereldkinderen.nl

www.wereldkinderen.nl

Van: ACT [mailto:info@againstchildtrafficking.org]

Verzonden: maandag 18 september 2017 22:36

Aan: Info | Wereldkinderen

CC: pma.hillen@ziggo.nl

Onderwerp: To Director: meeting minutes

Dear Froukje,

thank you for receiving me., based on the Sulekha´s search case and the fact that Anneke Prenger went unannounced to her house.

We spoke about:

- The history between ACT and Werelkdinderen, as a starting point – the children of the mentally ill mothers.

- Our founder Roelie Post – www.roeliepost.com

- The UNCRC, the Hague Adoption Convention and the subsidiarity principle

- We sort of disagreed on the subsidiarity principle. The UNCRC doesn´t see adoption and intercountry adoption as child protection measure.

- Also residential ( quality) care comes before Intercountry Adoptions. That all from a policy level.

- Wereldkinderen did and does support the Hague subsidiarity priniciple

- You argument against the RSJ Report and the UNCRC Art. 21 b is lack of data and the children´s homes are per se bad.

- I say, that the Bucharest Early intervention project is fraudaulent, so is the research from Ijzendoorn, Juffer , ADOC doubtful.

- I mentioned the dutch / India scandalls

- Here the indian media

- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7o7l4aBDHzQ&t=8s

-

Here are the links for the dutch media.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLp89Lz703o

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LW5f5Bac0ns

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pof_S0oFg0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMOqGGJzhxM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJESrRXTJfs

( in case you misunderstand, that ground / field research for all those stories has been done by ACT. Re- researched, fact checked by the media)

- We spoke about corruption in CARA and that none of the issues with india has been addressed. I warned you several times to re-start mediating from India.

- I gave you a brief about Ethiopia. To be clear, most of the crimes were covered up. They ll come out one day. I have full evidence for the fact, that Yesharek lied in court in Betty´s case.

- Betty deserves special assistance from Wereldkinderen. !

- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ej0BvsDqfS8&t=78s ( Brandpunt : children for sale)

- I request you, to take out from the archives the First report on Ethiopia I made. It s even more damning than “ Fruits of Ethiopia”

- Fruits of Ethiopia is here:

-

- http://www.againstchildtrafficking.org/wp-content/uploads/Second-Interim-Report-FINAL-redacted-for-distribution+annexures.pdf.

I request you to take out from the archives the travel reports etc. to India. Kindly read those of Pauline Hillen especially. You will find, that Suluchana Kalro and the Federation activily obstructs searches since years.

Kindly take out, Daksha van Dijcks file. You will find a police complaint against Shraddanand Mahila Ashram, which indirectly implicates Sulu as well.

This is yet to be followed up. I have and will not forget that.

- Of course there are more points we briefly touched, and tons of more material, such as articles, documents etc.

- I remain surprised that someone with the background like you, took over the leadership of Wereldkinderen. I hope it is for the better on the middle run and trust that you just have no idea what actually happened.

I take note of the fact, that you felt me as aggressive. However I would like to just reiterate, that especially here I defend the right of an adult adoptee, whose search is obstructed by your former partner in India.

In fact I m defensive here and sought the contact with you in order to solve the matter.

I reiterate, that ACT /CRIB expects maximum an apology from Suluchana Kalro or other orphanages in case things were done fraudulently, criminal or unethical.

Bottomline we only expect as adoptees full unrestricted access to our files.

Given the social circumstances, the files should be accessed with a qualified and experienced social worker, who also conducts the search and reunion in a manner which respects the privacy and situation of the mother. / family.

I want to make it ample clear, that we are NOT after Sulu, nor after Wereldkinderen, nor after Anneke Prenger.

I had forgotten to mention, that of course it is an apparent conflict of interest, that only those who did the adoptions claim to be allowed to do the search. Of course, they will do here and there a show good will case, but cover the rest up. Especially the really wrongful cases.

We together read Section 44 of the Adoption Rules 2017. You agreed also that Anjali, who is a lawyer, has a notarized and apostilled power of attorney , is not a third party by any means.

You also understood, that the Adoption rules say that the adoptee can contact the district child protection unit and that the district child protection unit shall facilitate the roots search.

I explained, that Sulu is unwilling to even cooperate with the local government, but turns to CARA and tries to block it from the highest level.

I told you that legal notices have been issued by the government. Also I made clear if necessary we will file a court case again.

Further I made clear, that I would even pay your travel expenses to India, so you could witness in the field what exactly goes on.

I also made clear Sulu can come with us and search. We have nothing to hide.

I informed Pauline Hillen on the way back about our meeting and agreed that I d openly copy this email to her. She d be happy to talk to you.

.

I sincerely hope, that Sulu and Anneke Prenger do refrain from contact or intimidation with the adoptee who requested our assistance.

Last but not least you agreed to tell me, how many adoptees Sulu assisted successfully with the search and reunion in the last 9 years. Frankly if you state she does, you should have known the number.

On the way back, I called Mr. Hoksbergen. He reconfirmed that Sulu is uncooperative and told me, that the WK Board has to do something.

I agreed to meet him as well and will give him more insights. I know him since 2005. We met in Chennai, while I was digging out the scandals.

Finally, I sincerely hope that with your and Sulu´s openes we can solve in the next weeks Sulekha´s case.

Best regards,

Arun Dohle

www.againstchildtrafficking.org

For Indian adoptees: Roots searches

www.india.againstchildtrafficking.org

Attachments area

Preview YouTube video Children for sale 60 minutes

Children for sale 60 minutes

Preview YouTube video Netwerk I

Netwerk I

Preview YouTube video Netwerk II

Netwerk II

Preview YouTube video Netwerk III Julia Rollings

Netwerk III Julia Rollings

Preview YouTube video press conference India-Dutch adoption scandal

press conference India-Dutch adoption scandal

Preview YouTube video Indian family files police complaint of kidnapping in the Netherlands

Indian family files police complaint of kidnapping in the Netherlands

Preview YouTube video Children for Sale, Brandpunt, KRO (English sub-titles)

Children for Sale, Brandpunt, KRO (English sub-titles)