Home  

'Stel mishandelt jarenlang adoptiekinderen'

'Stel mishandelt jarenlang adoptiekinderen'

Uitgegeven: 4 februari 2011 10:41
Laatst gewijzigd: 4 februari 2011 10:50

DORDRECHT - De politie heeft deze week een echtpaar uit Hendrik-Ido-Ambacht aangehouden die hun geadopteerde kinderen jarenlang zouden hebben mishandeld.

 

Het gaat om een 58-jarige man en zijn 53-jarige vrouw. Dat heeft het Openbaar Ministerie (OM) in Dordrecht vrijdag bekendgemaakt.

Het echtpaar adopteerde de kinderen eind jaren negentig. De mishandeling van de nu 18-jarige jongen en het 16-jarige meisje zouden vrijwel direct zijn begonnen. Van het meisje zou onder andere een arm zijn gebroken.

 

De jongen werd in 2010 in een opvanginstelling geplaatst. Daar kwam de zaak uit toen de jongen vertelde over de mishandelingen. Het meisje was toen ook al uit huis.

 

Aangifte

 

De politie startte het onderzoek, nadat de jongen aangifte had gedaan. Volgens het OM kwamen bij het gezin verscheidene hulpverleningsinstanties over de vloer.

De man en de vrouw zijn donderdag voorgeleid aan de rechter-commissaris. Die besloot dat het tweetal nog zeker twee weken blijft vastzitten.

Government simplifies adoption procedure

Government simplifies adoption procedure

By: Hungary Around the Clock
2011-02-04 09:42

The cabinet expects simplified adoption procedures and the introduction of related child care benefit to lead to a rise in adoptions, social affairs state secretary Miklós Soltész told reporters on Thursday.

 

Child care benefit for those who adopt children up to age ten has been available since January 1.

 

One of the adoptive parents may stay at home with the child for six months even if the child is beyond the age at which maternity benefits would be paid.

 

The number of adoptions has fallen in the past ten years. At present about 2,000 couples are waiting to adopt babies.

 

These changes are expected to persuade more women to give birth and give up their babies for adoption instead of having abortions, Soltész said. He added that abortion cannot be banned, nor is it worth banning it.

 

He confirmed that no changes are planned to regulations on adoptions for same-sex couples.

Orphanage sells Malawian children to Dutch Agency

Orphanage sells Malawian children to Dutch Agency 
Tuesday, 6 July 2010 
Tags: malawi new, malawi radio, schools in malawi, who malawi 
By Nyasa Times 
Published: July 6, 2010 
Kondanani Orphanage at Bvumbwe in Thyolo district is in partnership with Kind end Toekomst-a Dutch licensed adoption agency which systematically violates Malawian law and the Dutch Ministry of Justice and “buys” orphans from Malawi.

Kind en Toekomst (Foundation Child and Future) officially started an adoption programme from Malawi in 2006 through the partnership with Kondanani Orphanage which is under a Dutch lady Annie Chikhwaza.

Eye of the Child, a local Non Governmental Organization, says Malawi Laws rule that adopters must reside 18 months in Malawi before the adoption.

But that is not the case with the Dutch agency which buys children from Kondanani Orphanage. 
“In March 2007 Kind en Toekomst started cooperating with the Malawian children home Kondanani which is led by the Dutch Annie Chikwaza (married to a Malawian). According to Kind en Toekomst, Dutch adopters will only need to stay five weeks in Malawi,” reads update report accessed from one of the websites used by Chikhwaza and her Dutch partners.

Chikhwaza confirms the partnership in her Dutch communication on 29-08-2007 at 21.45 pm on http://wwwprikpagina.nl/read.php?=564&i=21334&t=21328 which was translated into English.

It reads, “…shared with you in my last newsletter that we had entered into an agreement with a Dutch Adoption Organisation. The first parents are here at present and staying with us on the property in one of the houses. They are adopting a set of twins.”

According to http://www.eo.nl/programma/eengoedbegin/2008 09/page/jan_en_Esther_Ekkel_Vorstenbosch/episode.esp?episode, a Dutch couple Jan en Esther Ekkel-Vorstenbosch adopted a two year old Malawian boy within 36 hours of their arrival in Malawi on 15 November 2008.

“36 hours after arriving in Malawi they already have a court appointment and the adoption is finalized. They have to stay some weeks in Malawi, guest house Kondanani, to wait for the visa to be provided by the Dutch Embassy in Zambia.

“They meet the grandmother of the child. Her daughter died and she hadno money to pay for milk powder. Only one of the adoptive parents is allowed to meet the grandmother and the child is not allowed to come. The programme does not make clear if the grandmother knows the childis leaving the country,” reads the site.

Chikhwaza further boasts, “ Several Dutch couples have changed their adoption country to Malawi now. Some are keeping blogs. Look at 24/7/07 htt://www.freewebs.com/joekelje/dagboek.htm .”

On this blog, it is announced that the first Dutch couple got a child proposed in April/May of “this year”. 
Another blog, http://www.freewebs.com/nigeriaantje/logboek.htm, Kind en Toekomost says after a very quick procedure, for African principles, the first Dutch couple comes back on 26 August. Everything went well.

Kondanani Orphanage is where pop diva Madonna also adopted a child-Mercy James. 
According to Dutch newspaper De Trouw dated 27 June 2007, Kind en Toekomst pays between 12 000 and 25 000 euros for an adoption.

The paper adds that Agency Wereldkinderen (Children of the World) that intermediated in 2005 for 475 children from 15 different countries and one of the largest agencies, calculates between 12 000 to 30 000 euros depending, inter alia, of the country, with or without travel and adoption of one child or three.

The paper adds that for the adoption of a child from Brazil nearly 11 000 euros and the legal fees are 1 810 euros, the country fee is 3 695 euros, the agency costs is 4 410 euros while other expenses are budgeted at about 1 000.

The Children Adoption Act s ole0ection 3 (5) reads, “an adoptio

Czech Supreme Court: Poverty not a good enough reason to take children into state care

Czech Supreme Court: Poverty not a good enough reason to take children into state care
Brno, 14.1.2011 11:05, (ROMEA)

The Czech Supreme Court has issued a new unifying opinion stating that a family's poverty and poor housing circumstances cannot be the sole basis for removing children from the home and placing them in state care. Children may be removed and institutionalized only in cases where other measures, such as assistance provided by the authorities and municipalities, has not led to an improvement in the children's living conditions, or in cases where other serious reasons exist. It is also necessary to interview the children concerned and determine their opinions.

Supreme Court spokesperson Petr Knötig announced the opinion to the Czech Press Agency today. "A family's material deficiencies, especially poor housing conditions, cannot in and of themselves constitute a reason for ordering the institutional care of a child," reads the opinion, which was released to civil rights and commercial law committees.

According to data released last May, about 21 000 children live in institutions in the Czech Republic. Experts in children's rights claim that roughly one-third of those children end up in institutions unnecessarily, while another third of that population is kept in institutions longer than necessary. The Czech Republic is one of the EU countries with the highest numbers of children in institutional care.

Last year the Czech Constitutional Court also ruled against the unnecessary breakup of families in cases where it is not absolutely necessary. Constitutional Court judges say it is only possible to remove children from their families in serious cases of a total absence of care or in cases where the child is in immediate danger.

The aim of the Supreme Court opinion is to unify conflicting rulings by Czech courts in cases where children have been living in impoverished families and in conditions of poor housing or hygiene. "When courts decide to place a child in institutional care, it is necessary to document all of the serious facts justifying family breakup. A family's insufficient assets (particularly those of the parents) resulting primarily in inappropriate or insufficient housing conditions may never in and of itself be considered such a fact," Knötig said.

Courts must first determine whether the state authorities and local municipalities have offered sufficient assistance to the family and what the results of that assistance have been. A municipality can sometimes manage to arrange for substitute housing, including temporary shelter. The state can provide material aid or at least advice as to how the family can improve its situation and find a solution to its problems. "An offer to adequately resolve the housing situation can also be made by other entities besides a state body or municipal government, such as churches, non-governmental organizations, etc.," the opinion reads.

Prior to ordering institutional care, a court may order supervision of the parents' child-rearing or warn the parents they are at risk of losing their children unless the situation improves. The Supreme Court has also ruled that the child him or herself must be interviewed during the decision on institutionalization. This applies to children who have reached the age at which they are able to express their own opinions. The court also emphasized the need for such court verdicts to be carefully justified.

In its opinion, the Supreme Court mentioned many verdicts from various parts of the Czech Republic. It criticized the approach taken by the District Court in Klatovy, where judges in one case were satisfied with committee reports only and did not interview the children concerned, who were aged eight, 10 and 15. On the other hand, the Supreme Court agreed with the approach taken by the District Court in Ústí nad Labem, which interviewed a 14-year-old girl in one particular case. The girl, who had been institutionalized and then returned to her mother's care, testified that she wanted to return to the institutional facility.

Czech Press Agency, translated by Gwendolyn Al

Sierra Leone parents demand kids' return

Sierra Leone parents demand kids' return
2011-02-02 12:05
 
Freetown - Scores of relatives of a group of 29 children whom they say were illegally adopted from Sierra Leone 14 years ago stormed the children's ministry Tuesday to demand the return of their offspring.

Families chanted "we want our kids back" and "return our children fast", five months after government pledged to get to the bottom of trafficking claims through a commission which has yet to begin its work.

A weeping Bintu Koroma said her six-year-old child was taken from her on the pretext of protecting her from the war that was then raging in Makeni, in the north of the country.

"I am fed up with getting no clear detail as to what has happened to my dear Posseh. Nobody is telling us the truth and it is only the government that can now help us to get to the truth of the matter."

The government promised in September that the creation of a three-man fact-finding committee headed by a high court judge would make a fresh attempt to clear up the case.

The commission would investigate the incident in which some 40 parents overall claim that their children were taken to the United States for adoption without their consent by a local NGO, Help a Needy Child International (HANCI).

HANCI was established in 1996, setting up child survival centres in Freetown and Makeni where it offered services of schooling from kindergarten to tertiary level.

When civil war broke out, parents sent their children to the organisation for protection and after the war, which ended in 2002, parents allege when they came to fetch their children they were told they had been adopted.

HANCI has repeatedly claimed the adoptions were legal.

New Social Minister Denis Sandy said the commission was being held up due to logistical reasons.

"None of these people would frame a story that each of their 29 children were taken for adoption illegally and insist that their children be returned," he said.
-         AFP

Adoptions of foreign children by Americans drop to lowest level since 1995

Adoptions of foreign children by Americans drop to lowest level since 1995

David Crary, The Associated Press 
NEW YORK, N.Y. - The number of foreign children adopted by Americans fell by 13 per cent last year, reaching the lowest level since 1995 due in large part to a virtual halt to adoptions from Guatemala because of corruption problems.

China remained America's No. 1 source of adopted children, accounting for 3,401, according to figures released by the State Department on Monday for the 2010 fiscal year. Ethiopia was second, at 2,513, followed by Russia at 1,082 and South Korea at 863.

 

Guatemala was the No. 1 source country in 2008, with 4,123 adoptions by Americans. But the number sank to 756 for 2009 and to only 51 last year as the Central American country's fraud-riddled adoption industry was shut down while authorities drafted reforms.

The overall figures for 2010 showed 11,059 adoptions from abroad, down from 12,753 in 2009 and down more than 50 per cent from the all-time peak of 22,884 in 2004.

The last time there were fewer foreign adoptions to the U.S. was in 1995, when there were 9,679.

The latest figures did not include the more than 1,100 children airlifted from Haiti to the United States after the earthquake in January 2010. Most of those children were in the U.S. adoption pipeline, but the adoptions were not finalized by the end of the fiscal year.

The adoptions from Ethiopia were up by more than 200 from 2009, but adoptions from Russia fell by about 500.

Some pending adoptions from Russia were slowed after a Tennessee adoptive mother put a 7-year-old boy on a plane back to Moscow, unaccompanied by an adult, in April. As a result, U.S. officials agreed to a Russian demand to negotiate a new, binding agreement to cover adoptions between the two countries.

Organizations representing U.S. adoption agencies have called on the U.S. government to be more active in trying to reverse the decline in international adoptions. However, the State Department says any such efforts must be accompanied by initiatives to provide better options for orphans in their home countries, including support for birth parents and foster care.

"Not every child is going to be eligible for international adoption," said Susan Jacobs, the State Department's special adviser on children's issues. "The first thing we need to do is protect children in their own countries."

The State Department also reported that 43 American children were adopted by residents of foreign countries last year - 19 of them went to Canada and 18 to the Netherlands.

Spanish judge rejects 'baby-theft' probe


General Francisco Franco ruled Spain from 1939-75. Spain's attorney general's office has rejected a demand that it open a national probe into allegations that newborn babies were stolen from their mothers and sold to other families for decades under a policy approved by Franco's dictatorship.
General Francisco Franco ruled Spain from 1939-75. Spain's attorney general's office has rejected a demand that it open a national probe into allegations that newborn babies were stolen from their mothers and sold to other families for decades under a policy approved by Franco's dictatorship.
AFP - Spain's attorney general's office on Tuesday rejected a demand that it open a national probe into allegations that newborn babies were stolen from their mothers and sold to other families for decades under a policy approved by Franco's dictatorship.
Anadir, an association fighting for the stolen children and their families, presented the demand on Thursday on behalf of the victims and families of 261 snatched babies along with evidence including testimony from nurses who admitted taking part.
It estimated there could have been as many as 300,000 cases during General Francisco Franco's 1939-75 dictatorship and up to the end of the late 1980s.
"The attorney general's office refused to open an inquiry at the national level and asks that each family present a criminal complaint at their local court where the alleged crime took place," said a spokesman for the attorney general's office.
The attorney general's office justified the move on the grounds that those responsible for the baby thefts were not part of a single network but operated independently from different parts of the country separately.
Under a 1940 decree the state was allowed to take children into custody if their "moral education" was at risk.
The decree allowed the dictatorship to take children of jailed left-wing opponents from their mothers with state approval and often the blessing of the Roman Catholic Church to purge Spain of feared Marxist influence.
Historians say many of the "lost children" were put in Catholic religious orders and became nuns or priests while others were illegally adopted by other families with changed identities.
Many of the same doctors, nurses and officials who carried out the Franco-era policy are accused of continuing it after the dictator's death and Spain's return to democracy as an illegal business that provided babies for cash to women unable to give birth.
Many new mothers were told their babies had died suddenly within hours of birth and the hospital had taken care of their burials when in fact they were given to another family, according to Anadir.

Comments to article:

Comment: Jill Lies | Ethical Adoptions cost Money

Author:
Mom of Adopted Kids | Former Voluntee
Date:
2011-01-28 11:11:49
Comment to:
EOCO probes sale of kids at orphanage


I'd like to clarify a few things:

1. I was at the orphanage when Jill Smith used Papa to pacify her adopted daughter. She gave Papa toys, new clothes, fed him and took him around so that her daughter would not be scared. Papa believed he too was being adopted by the way Jill was treating him, however this was not the case. And when she bonded with her daughter, Jill cast Papa aside and left town.

2. Jill Smith and her husband had a change of heart and decided they wanted to adopt Papa later on. The orphanage director did not want to give the child to the Smiths (for a variety of reasons)so Jill and Zeke decided to kidnap Papa from Hohoe Orphanage and hid him in an attempt to illegally adopt him in another part of the country. They bribed people along the way to make this happen. The false accusations made in this article were written out of spite.

3. The director of the Hohoe Orphanage has been facilitating ethical and legal adoptions to find loving homes for children.

4. There is a HUGE difference between "selling children" and legal adoptions. I really wish people would understand this point, and stop using the words "selling children" or "trafficking" when talking about adoption. People seem to be surprised that adoptions should cost anything at all, but in the world of adoptions, $7000 is a very reasonable fee to adopt a child. The money does not go to the orphanage director alone. There are many costs associated with a legal adoption such as lawyer fees, medical exam/tests, court fees, care of the child while at the orphanage, transportation, etc. An adoption agency or independent facilitator must collect a fee from the family in order to facilitate an ethical and legal adoption according to Ghanaian laws. This is NOT "selling children." A proper relinquishment of rights is obtained, a social welfare report, and many other documents. The case is heard before a judge and the judge decides whether or not a adoption order is granted.

5. Taking a child, not receiving a relinquishment of rights, and moving the child to another part of the country to get an adoption order is illegal. This is what the Smiths did.

6. There is a lot of child trafficking going on in Ghana....by Ghanaians and other African nationals. I really wish that the Ghanaian government and the newspapers would focus on this. Very few children are actually trafficked to America and Europe. The adoption process is a long, grueling, and expensive process and most people would not put that kind of energy and money into trafficking children through the adoption and visa process. Most of the children are trafficked by Ghanaians or surrounding African countries where children are forced to work on farms, on the lake, or as servants and sex slaves. Those are the people that the Ghanaian government should be focusing on.

7. Embassy officials are trained to look at documents, interview adoptive parents, and interview the birth family to ensure that any child leaving the country has not been trafficked. It's the officials inside the country that need to be investigated more carefully, like Helena Obeng-Asamoah, who aided the Smiths.

8. When people like Jill Smith spread false rumors, it has a domino effect. As you can see by all the previous posts, many people blindly believe everything they read in newspapers or hear on the radio. What most people don't understand is that a lie like this can have an adverse effect on many, many families who are currently in the process of legally adopting their children and trying to bring them home. Jill is selfish, plain and simple. She is angry and wants revenge. She thinks her revenge will be on the orphanage director, but her previous attempts to discredit his adoptions only made the visa process at the embassy more costly, complicated, and longer for every other family adopting in Ghana. I really don't think Jill would care if her actions shut down adoptions in Ghana altogether. She only thinks of herself.

9. Helena Obeng-Asamoah has her own agenda –– that is to shut down private orphanages and completely control all adoptions through her office. Why? Because she will make money. So, of course she wants to discredit others who are facilitating adoptions in Ghana. She too does not care how this false article may affect many good families waiting for their children. 

And who is actually thinking about the children?

Greed and selfishness are the reasons why this article came about.
==============================================================================================================

omment: Jill Smith is lying

Author:
Former Volunteer at HCOH
Date:
2011-01-27 14:09:17
Comment to:
EOCO probes sale of kids at orphanage


I volunteered at HCOH in 2008, I was there when Jill and her husband were there and I can assure you this woman is lying.
The story is that when they arrived in Ghana, they used to take Papa with them whenever they went, they even too him with them to different parks, restaurants and their hotel room. I don't know what that woman and her husband told Papa, but he was very excited about moving to America with them. We who were there knew that it was not the case, because Jill NEVER mentioned this to anyone, they had not started the process, they did not speak with the social services and they did not file for adoption.

I still remember the day Simth family came to take their little girl. Papa was all ready, he had packed all her belongings (a few shirts, couple of pants and underwear and the only toy he had). But Jill and her coward husband did not come to the orphanage to pick up their daughter and instead asked Nicolas to bring the girl to their hotel. Papa stood by the door for hours and when h finally realized that they were gone he was devastated.

In my entire life, I have never seen a woman as false, as dishonest and as indifference to the pain she caused that little boy.

I am VERY disappointed that your site brings that woman as your reference.
This woman thinks she can buy everything with money, and when it doesn't work, she blames everyone who know about her wrong doings and screams loud and acts like a victim.

I am willing to go to court and witness about this case, not because I support Nicolas or her Australian 'girl friend' but because I am disgusted by the behavior of the Smith family who supposed to be Christians but are nothing but a bunch of rich hypocrites who only wanted to have black children because 'it would look good for them at their church' with other people looking at them as 'good people' just because they had African children.
================================================================================

omment: Jill Smith is under investigation by CID

Author:
Former Volunteer at HCOH
Date:
2011-01-27 14:56:41
Comment to:
EOCO probes sale of kids at orphanage


To the person who wrote this article:

PLEASE contact CID to find out about her and her criminal acts.

PLEASE do not refer to a criminal who is also under investigation by the US Embassy and American authorities for involvement of kidnapping Papa and keeping him against his will in an illegal orphanage by people PAID by Mrs. Smith and her husband.

PLEASE people, for all of you who love your country, do not let these people take advantage your news papers and your web site to spread their lies.
==============================================================================================

omment: All orphanges engage in selling the kids

Author:
Kojo
Date:
2011-01-27 08:48:31
Comment to:
Oh Ghana!!!!!!!


From Bolga to Accra, all the orphanges engage in selling children to be taken abroad. The Social Welfare Dept is completely inept. The practice is aided by the eagerness of the relatives of these unfortunate children when they hear that the child will be taken abroad. They even urge on the officials of the orphanges to speed up the process.

The Dept of Social WElfare is the most incompetent govt institution in the country. We all saw how the Director was fumbling in Anas Arimiyaw Anas's revelations on the Osu Children's Home!

Kids For Sale...By Orphanages

Kids For Sale...By Orphanages

Date: 21-Aug-2010 

Some orphanages in the country are said to be engaged in the illegal sale of children under their care to wealthy foreign buyers.

The officers in charge of Orphanages at the Department of Social Welfare, Ms Helena Obeng-Asamoah, said the department was investigating a number of such cases and warned that it was illegal for orphanages to charge money for the release of children under their care.

Condemning the phenomenon, she said, “Orphanages have no right to collect money from any individual who expresses interest in a child,” adding that various education programmes had gone o to educate orphanage officials on such negative practices, the last one being about a month ago.

EOCO probes sale of kids at orphanage

Source: citifmonline
EOCO probes sale of kids at orphanage
The Economic and Organised Crimes Office (EOCO) has begun investigations into allegations of child trafficking at the Hohoe Christian Orphanage.

The Deputy Executive Director of the EOCO in charge of Operations, Mr Charles Nii Adama Akrong, told the Daily Graphic that his office had reports that the Founder and Executive Director of the orphanage, Mr Nicholas Koku Azakpo, was allegedly engaged in the sale of the children at his orphanage to wealthy buyers in Europe and America.

He said suspected accomplices of Mr Azakpo at the Department of Social Welfare were also being investigated and confirmed that four investigators from the office had been to Hohoe to take statements from Mr Azakpo.

The office had also taken statements from Mr Issa Amegashitsi, the foster father of Delali Papa Amoaku, an eight-year-old boy who Mr Azakpo allegedly attempted to sell to an Italian for $7,000 last year and other persons who knew about the founder's activities, Mr Akrong said.

EOCO officials have also interviewed Mrs Helena Obeng-Asamoah, the Social Welfare Officer in charge of orphanages.

He said the investigations would later be extended to cover the activities of all orphanages and foster homes in the country because the sale of children in the country was believed to be widespread.

Mr Akrong said EOCO would not hesitate to recommend the closure of private orphanages in the country if investigations proved that proprietors had engaged in criminal activities such as the sale or trafficking of children.

Under the Economic and Organised Crime Act, 2010 (Act 804), EOCO is mandated to "investigate and, on the authority of the Attorney-General, prosecute serious offences that involve financial or economic loss to the republic or any state entity or institution in which the state has financial interest, money laundering, human trafficking, prohibited cyber activity, tax fraud and other serious offences".

It is also mandated to "recover the proceeds of crime; monitor the activities connected with the offences to detect correlative crimes; take reasonable measures necessary to prevent the commission of crimes specified and their correlative offences", among other things.

Last year, a tussle ensued between Mr Amegashitsi and Mr Azakpo over Delali when Mr Amegashitsi withdrew the boy from the orphanage, claiming he had heard that Mr Azakpo was about to offer the child for sale to an Italian.

That tussle resulted in Mr Amegashitsi being arrested and locked up by the police on two occasions on trumped-up charges of conspiracy to engage in child trafficking.

He was to be arraigned before an Accra circuit court on September 14, 2010 but minutes before he was scheduled to appear, the Attorney-General's Department, which had wind of it, stopped the trial.

On December 1, 2010, the A-G's Department also ordered that Delali, who had been taken away from Mr Amegashitsi by the police since July 26, 2010 and kept at the Osu Children's Home, should be handed over back to him.

And in August the same year, an American citizen, Mrs Jill Wiggins Smith, accused Mr Azakpo of demanding $7,000 from her to adopt Delali from his orphanage.

Mrs Smith had, earlier in 2008, adopted a two-year-old girl from the same orphanage, for which, she told the Daily Graphic, she had first paid $9,000 to an agency in the US called No Greater Gift.

However, No Greater Gift ceased to exist immediately after she had adopted the little girl.

Mrs Smith alleged that later when she arrived in Ghana to take the child away, Mr Azakpo extorted $2,000 and $300 from her on different occasions at his orphanage.

She said the move to adopt Delali stalled because of her refusal to pay the $7,000 demanded by Mr Azakpo.

When reached by the Daily Graphic for his comments, the founder denied the figures and said, "I just received $100 and another $200 and a few other hundreds later to process the papers".

He declined to answer further questions.