Home  

The Baby Merchants – Part 1

Article Index Sections Human Trafficking
The Baby Merchants – Part 1 Print E-mail
Written by Raissa Robles   
Monday, 01 June 2009
Digg!

What looked like a nursery filled with babies was a storage, processing and shipping center for Filipino babies.

When policemen entered a house in Jala Jala, Rizal just southeast of Manila on the night of December 15, 2008, they had a warrant to arrest a suspect accused of writing bouncing checks.

The last thing they expected to find was a room full of crying, cooing newborn babies.

“We were amazed to see so many babies,” Jala Jala town police chief Larry Malaybalay told Newsbreak.

There were nine diapered infants; each snuggled in a crib with stuffed toys for company. Each crib had a name on it. The room had the look of a bright and cheery nursery.

There was only one problem: there were no parents. Instead, the house had 11 adults including seven nannies and one Singaporean woman who repeatedly told the town police chief, “I love babies.”

“We asked for papers” to explain the babies' presence. “They couldn't show any,” he said.

“We arrested them all.”

Chief Inspector Malaybalay said “I felt something was wrong. Why were there so many babies (when) that was not an orphanage? Of course we became very suspicious.”

It turned out he had grounds for suspicion. Digging into the babies' backgrounds, the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) realized that the police may have stumbled on an international baby trafficking ring operating under its very nose since 2006.

DSWD Secretary Esperanza Cabral described the case as “very important” to her agency. She gave Newsbreak access to other agency officials.

The DSWD now suspects that what looked like a nursery filled with babies was actually something more chilling: a storage, processing and shipping center for Filipino babies.

Possibly involving more than 30 babies, it may well turn out to be the biggest and only case of highly organized and systematic baby trafficking in years. It shows how easy it is to smuggle babies out of the country, authorities said.

The operators preyed on the anguish of women, buying their unwanted babies from P2,000 to P7,000 each, some while still in their mothers' wombs. The babies were stored initially in a place in Pililla town and later in neighboring Jala Jala.

The Pililla town operation was ostensibly an orphanage called Hope for the Homeless Angels. It was registered with the Pililla government but never registered with the DSWD nor the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), as required by law.

Authorities believe that while the babies were in Pililla then later transferred to Jala Jala, they were fattened up, vaccinated, provided genuine or fake birth certificates, then flown to a commercial adoption agency in Singapore owned by Irene Low Ai Lian, who was caught red-handed with the babies in that December raid in Jala Jala.

The babies lived a regimented life, their bodily functions and milk intake closely monitored. For instance, according to a schedule provided to their nannies, they all had to be exposed to sunlight by early dawn.

If the police had not found the nine babies when they did, two would have simply disappeared, flown out of Manila as hand-carried baggage by December 22, 2009, according to a handwritten schedule taped to the babies' bedroom wall. Two other babies had been flown out earlier on December 6, the same schedule showed.

Authorities are now trying to trace up to 30 babies who were processed and shipped in this manner starting 2006, Supt. Malaybalay said.

A number of babies allegedly never made it to the airport, though. “I was told babies died on them in their previous location in Pililla which they called Hope for the Homeless Angels,” claimed Voltaire Gellido, one of Low's co-accused. Gellido was included in the charge sheet since he owns the house in Jala Jala where the babies were found and he was the original object of the police manhunt.

Gellido, a former mayor of Jala Jala, claimed in an exclusive interview that Low had decided to lease his Jala Jala residence in order to move out all the babies from Pililla because three of them nearly died there of pneumonia. She referred to the former site, located in a squatter area as “that dinky place,” he said.

The babies who did reach Singapore allegedly ended up with Low's Singapore-based agency, where they were turned over to foreigners who had each paid a “processing fee” of at least P600,000 (US$12,500) per baby. Upon request, though, this fee could be discounted or paid on installment, interest free.

In comparison, legal adoptions which all have to be coursed through the Philippine government, cost at least US$3,200 in processing and other fees, according to the Inter-Country Adoption Board (ICAB), the lone state agency to authorize all foreign adoptions and accredit all foreign adoption agencies.

Low's adoption agency in Singapore, the Fox Family Services Pte. Ltd., is not in the ICAB registry and therefore not authorized to facilitate foreign adoptions of Filipino babies, said Sally Escutin, chief of the DSWD legal service.

“Singapore is a transit point,” she said. Many babies eventually ended up elsewhere like Australia or Germany, she said.

Because of this, sources told Newsbreak that the Australian Embassy had contacted Philippine authorities to learn more about the case.

A passion for babies

It was the presence of a middle-aged Singaporean matron in an obscure lake shore town, two and a half hours drive from Manila, that set off alarm bells for the police.

Slim of build with her hair in a bun, the conservatively dressed Low, 51, was the picture of bewildered sincerity. “Her allegation was that she was shouldering the costs of the orphanage in good faith,” Supt. Malaybalay recalled her telling him.

“She said to me, 'I love babies'.”

She refused to give any statement, written or verbal at the police station.

But she gave interviews, especially to Singapore media, disowning any crime. She said she was merely a visitor and a donor to the orphanage housed in Jala Jala, now renamed The Jala Jala Home for the Needy Angels, Inc. She said she was an innocent, gullible and misguided do-gooder who was conned into donating large sums to what she belatedly realized was an illegal scheme.

According to Singapore's leading daily, The Straits Times: “She said she was staying in the house to oversee its refurbishment and to distribute food and clothes to the infants while the home awaited license by the authorities.'I am not here to match babies (with couples), but as a donor to support the home,'” she said. (read The Straits Times' story Facing prosecution)

“I am not a baby-trafficker,” she also told The New Paper, Singapore's second largest, days after her arrest. “I was at the wrong place at the wrong time.” (read The New Paper's story S'porean adoption agency owner accused of baby-trafficking )

Since her arrest last December, DSWD officials have been trying to find a link between her Fox Family commercial adoption agency in Singapore and the babies recovered outside Manila.

Atty. Escutin told Newsbreak she had stumbled on a definite link while surfing in Fox Family's official website. But the website disappeared and was replaced by an “under renovation” sign. She could no longer access it, she said. She called her discovery very revealing.

Newsbreak also encountered the same “under renovation” sign and therefore phoned Low's lawyer, Reynaldo Directo, to get her side of the story. Repeated requests for a return call were ignored.

Newsbreak therefore searched the web again and managed to retrieve portions of the Fox Family website and phone numbers.

Newsbreak was just as surprised as Irene Low was when she personally answered one of the numbers posted on the internet. “I'm somewhere around (the Philippines) but how did you get my number?” she asked.

When told it was from her website, she said, “but my website is no longer up.” Later, she said, “I have pulled out my website as you know until my resolution is clear.”

Out on bail but barred from leaving the country, she said, “I'm still waiting for a resolution. It's not over yet. I'm just waiting. Don't know why it's taking so long. I don't know if it's good or bad.”

“I did it out of my heart....That's what my passion is. I want to help people. I help kids and I help families....I just wanted to (help), because I've adopted two kids and they were wonderful.”

She sounded fragile and hurt - “It (the case) just affects me emotionally. I just can't get back on again until everything is clear.”

She was also very wary. She refused to discuss the case and told Newsbreak to talk to her lawyer because “he's got all the right words.” 

Newsbreak asked her whether she was getting her babies from Pililla and Jala Jala. She flatly denied this. “I'm not getting babies from there. I don't like these questions because it may implicate me from what I'm saying. Not that I'm guilty, I'm not.”

Her denial ran contrary to the introductory statement posted on her company website which said: “Fox Family Services Adoption Centre was established primarily to find good families for unwanted and abandoned infants and toddlers in the Philippines and elsewhere and to assist you in finding a child.”

When Newsbreak pointed that out, she said, “Well, it is not only in Philippines. In Philippines basically, in fact, I'm working with the DSWD.”

When asked whether she was referring to Maria Lourdes Martinez, the social welfare officer of the town of Pililla who is her co-accused in the case, she said, “Sorry, you've got to speak with the lawyer about this.”

Pressed further which DSWD official she had been working with, she said, “I really do not know if I should tell you at this point in time.”

Low also made the assertion that her adoption agency in Singapore could operate freely in the Philippines without need of accreditation from the Philippine government.

“It's not necessary for any adoption agency to be accredited...by any government,” she said.

She gave Newsbreak this parting advice: “Before you write a story get your facts right, get a lawyer. You don't just get half a story from me.”

This article was made possible with the generous support of the American people through the United States Department of State Office to Monitor and Combat trafficking in Persons and The Asia Foundation. The contents are the  responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Department of State of the United States or The Asia Foundation.

Book Reviews: Butter and Guns: Americaªs Cold War Economic Diplomacy

Customer Reviews
Butter and Guns: Americaªs Cold War Economic Diplomacy

2 Reviews
5 star:   (0)
4 star:   (0)
3 star:   (0)
2 star:  (1)
1 star:  (1)
  
  Average Customer Review
 (2 customer reviews)
Share your thoughts with other customers
   Search Customer Reviews
 
 Only search this product's reviews

Most Helpful First | Newest First

  10 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
 Good on diplomatic history, bad on economics, March 30, 2000
By Excerpt from "The Independent Review" (Oakland, CA) - See all my reviews

This review is from: BUTTER AND GUNS: America's Cold War Economic Diplomacy (Hardcover)
To what did Americans owe their postwar prosperity? In "Butter and Guns: America's Cold War Economic Diplomacy," Yale University professor of history Diane B. Kunz argues: the defense spending policies of the national security state....
If military spending indeed "continually primed the pump of the American economy" (p. 63), as Kunz asserts, she might have wondered where the pump-priming dollars came from. What is missing from her analysis is a sensitivity to the notion of opportunity cost. As historians Thomas G. Paterson ("On Every Front: The Making and Unmaking of the Cold War") and Paul Kennedy ("The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers") have noted, the Cold War saddled America with enormous material costs in terms of forgone socioeconomic well-being, in terms of lost consumer-oriented production, and in terms of overburdened government finances. Moreover, even in the areas of education and infrastructure spending (GI Bills and the interstate highway act), where contemporary liberal economists claim that government spending contributed positively to economic growth, it hardly stands to reason that the Cold War was a prerequisite to such spending. The Cold War did allow America to play a preponderant role in the postwar world, particularly while the economies of Europe and Japan still lay in ruins. Yet the enormous demands that the Cold War placed on the American economy saddled it with costs that became quite apparent by the 1970s. Even NSC-68, the postwar "blueprint" of the national security state, recognized the enormousness of those costs. Kunz does not.
Because Kunz misinterprets the mainsprings of economic growth in the postwar period, she can only lament the passing of the Cold War. Having demonstrated little faith in the workings of free markets, she can only look to the future with a sense of foreboding, as her chapter entitled "Free Trade Forever?" suggests. She concludes, absurdly (but consistently), that "Josef Stalin rescued American fifty years ago" (p. 334) and wonders who is to rescue America now, because "the free market cannot solve every ill" (p. 335).
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you?    Report this | Permalink
 Comment

From fast track to mommy track to adoption activist


Published: May 31, 2009 02:00 AM
Modified: May 30, 2009 09:25 PM

Diane Kunz of Durham with Elizabeth, 4, the youngest of her eight children. Four sons are biological, and four daughters are adopted.
Harry Lynch, Staff photo by Harry Lynch
Buy Photo
 
From fast track to mommy track to adoption activist
BY KRISTIN COLLINS, Staff Writer
Diane Kunz started with the desire to change one child's life.
But 13 years after adopting her first daughter from China, she now has hopes of helping every child, at home or abroad, who is growing up without a family.
Kunz, of Durham, is the mother of eight children, four adopted and four biological. She is also one of the nation's leading advocates for adoption, quietly changing national policy and helping thousands of families bring home children.
She and another adoptive mother are the founders of a think tank, the Center for Adoption Policy, based in New York, which aims to remove barriers to adoption. The group's work has won national awards and made Kunz a player on an international stage. Along the way, Kunz has also become a sort of guru for people going through the complex process of adoption.
She does most of her work from her home in Durham, baking chocolate chip muffins one minute and sitting in on a conference call with the State Department the next.
She has been a corporate lawyer in New York and a professor at Yale, but she says this job -- for which she receives no pay -- is the true work of her life.
"Every child has the right to a permanent, loving family," Kunz says.
A life of surprises
Kunz, 56, seems as surprised as anyone at the turn her life has taken since she helped found the center eight years ago. As a young woman, she never imagined herself as an impassioned social activist or a Brady Bunch-style mom.
The only child of Jewish immigrants, Holocaust survivors who settled in New York City, she spent much of her early life earning a law degree at Cornell University and working long hours at a corporate law firm in her native city. She and her husband, Tom, whom she met in law school, didn't have their first child until 1986, 12 years after they married.
She eventually had four sons and went on to become a history professor at Yale. She never even thought of adopting until the mid-1990s, when Chinese children became available for international adoption and she and Tom read a story about the phenomenon in The New York Times Magazine.
Once they learned more about it, they felt compelled to use their wealth, earned in successful law and academic careers, to help an orphaned child. Adoptions often cost tens of thousands of dollars, but that was no obstacle for them.
"We just had a feeling that we could do this," Kunz says. "We've been very lucky, and we felt this was the right thing to do."
They brought Eleanor home in 1996 and watched the child, who might have been doomed to life in a Spartan orphanage, blossom under their care. Soon, one child led to the next.
Their spacious home and the help of a nanny has made a large family easier for the Kunzes than for most. The younger children attend private school, and the Kunzes still get to go out alone once a week for dinner. Because of their advantages, they came to see helping unparented children as a moral obligation.
"Once you save one person's life," Tom Kunz says, "it's kind of hard to sit back and say, 'That's enough.' "
Hurdling barriers
Over the years, Kunz, like many adoptive parents, became something of an expert in the tricky process of adoption. She met another adoptive mother in New York, Ann Reese, who has two children from Romania, and they began to talk about all the many difficulties of bringing parentless children into their homes.
Some of the barriers were ideological, such as a bias against placing black children with white parents, but others were simply bureaucratic snags, problems such as transferring health insurance between states.
"We just started conversations about, gee, this is wrong, and why aren't there people working on this?" Reese says.
Eventually, they decided to combine their expertise to help children stuck in foster homes or orphanages.
Four years ago, Kunz and her husband moved to Durham, and she continues her work from her home beside a golf course.
Now, Kunz and Reese are a sort of SWAT team for adoptive parents in desperate situations.
When thousands of Chinese adoptions were nearly stalled last year because of the technicalities of an international treaty, they negotiated with the State Department to allow those families already in process to bring their children home.
Also last year, when the U.S. government refused to issue visas to several hundred children given up for adoption in Vietnam, Kunz became both a sort of social worker and lobbyist on their behalf. U.S. immigration officials said there were problems verifying that the children had been abandoned by their parents.
Barry and Donna DeLong of Durham were among those denied visas for the boy they wanted to adopt from Vietnam. Barry DeLong said there was no evidence of wrongdoing in their case, and the Vietnamese government was willing to allow the adoption. So they joined several Americans who went to Vietnam and adopted their children, even though they were not allowed to bring them back to the United States.
They, like many, were prepared to stay in Vietnam permanently if the U.S. government refused to issue their children visas. They had been living in Vietnam in a state of near-panic for weeks when Kunz began offering legal advice to them and several other families via e-mail and conference calls.
Barry DeLong said she was a calm yet forceful voice in a time of chaos. And he thinks it was partly her influence that, after several months, persuaded U.S. officials to relent and grant the children visas.
"I got a sense from her that this was where she was going to stay," DeLong said. "And if this person [in the U.S. government] wanted to continue in a happy career, they couldn't just blow her off."
Looking at each child
In addition to helping would-be parents, Kunz is also working to mute growing opposition to international adoption. Groups such as UNICEF say that allowing wealthy Westerners to adopt children from poor nations is a Band-Aid solution that fails to address the fundamental issues that cause child abandonment.
Kunz says she looks at the issue from the perspective of each child. "I would be happy to have a world where there is no prejudice and no poverty and no war," she says. "But right now, there are unparented children."
She says the best solution to problems that have stymied international adoption in recent years is to ensure an ethical process. The center is helping the State Department create more stringent guidelines for adoption agencies and pushing for harsher penalties for those who perpetrate fraudulent adoptions.
Kunz can talk about her work for hours. But on this day, she is interrupted by the patter of feet. Her three youngest girls bound into the room, giggling and shouting, followed by their nanny. Soon they are jumping into Kunz's lap, crawling around her feet, demanding hugs.
The center's work has become her vocation, but she says her own family -- built in part by adoption -- is her greatest reward.
"It's a cliché," she says, "but it's true."
kristin.collins@newsobserver.com or 919-829-4881
Read The News & Observer print edition on your computer with the new e-edition!
Diane Bernstein Kunz
Born: Nov. 9, 1952 in Queens, N.Y.
Family: husband, Tom Kunz; sons, Charles, 23, James, 22, William, 17, and Edward, 15; daughters, Eleanor, 13, Sarah, 8, Catherine, 5, and Elizabeth, 4.
Education: bachelor's degree from Barnard University; Law degree from Cornell University; master's degree from Oxford University; doctorate in history from Yale University
Career: corporate lawyer, 1976-1983; history professor at Yale, 1988-1998; history professor at Columbia University, 1998-2001; founder and member of board of directors, Center for Adoption Policy, 2001-present.
Honors: authored several award-winning books on diplomatic history. In 2008, won the Angels In Adoption award from the Congressional Coalition on Adoption Institute.
Hobbies: running, travel, reading.
© Copyright 2009, The News & Observer Publishing Company
A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company

 

Traffickers orphans in Romania ii tepuiesc on foreign pictures and presentations type Teleshopping

After blocking international adoptions

Traffickers orphans in Romania ii tepuiesc on foreign pictures and presentations type Teleshopping
by Razvan Popa | 22 MARCH 2006

0 foto 0 audio 0 video 0 other files

After you have been a mere merchandise export traffickers, some children in Romanian orphanages are now used as a bait to give the foreign tepe. Infants have become targets for traffickers in flesh, and those of several years are presented in photos as a product of taraba. Pictures are used to cheat on occidentalii desperate to adopt a child. Usually, the amounts removed by a presentation of the market "are the order of several thousand dollars.

After 2005 - when the Romanian authorities have imposed a total blockade in the adoptions - traffickers have allegedly found that "port" through which to continue to "export" the Romanian children. M. and D. Bosshart are Swiss citizens. The two lived, recently, a Romanian nightmare. Swiss story begins in 2002.

Then, in Romania, at Giurgiu is born Baby Alexandra. Birth certificate bears the date 6 March 2002.

In that period in Romania was in force moratorium that international adoptions were blocked. After two months of the birth of little, the National Authority for Child Protection and Adoption of a file was submitted by a certain Dan Vasile Aurel. The person listed as president of the Romanian Association of New Family - organization "apartment" located in Pantelimon, but appears in a decision by the government as accredited on adoptions. Dan Vasile then wanted to adopt a child without a name or specify the place where it is located. In August 2002 - three months after submission of the dossier - Dan Vasile fixed "target" and mentions in the file name Alexandra. During this period - the law - a family from Switzerland arrive in Romania and has little contact with the school institution in the state! A visit to the home of Giurgiu, although Alexandra figure already in the care of foster care. Moreover, although there was consent of the mother, although the child was considered neadoptabil and in Romania was the "embargo" in terms of international adoptions, the "Romanian New Family" was not any classified or rejected! So it came as elvetienii believe that will become the adoptive parents of the daughter. The two were in love at first sight for little at the center of investment in Giurgiu. Received from insurance "Romanian New Family" that the problem will be solved. I even received some pictures. In the three images is presented as a little girl at the market - a person dressed in a robe (probably a nurse) looks like a child trophy. Il away from you like a product, such teleshopping. Assistance smiling, little girl is scared and looks dizzy. The images are professionally done, in the sense that the background there is any object that demaste location. These images have come to the family from Switzerland who started upgraded "room daughter. They arranged a vain, because no girl has arrived in Switzerland. A court upheld the request of Romanian families who wanted to Alexandra.

Elvetienii saying little for the adoption of Giurgiu paid 9,000 euros! "This child lives in our hearts and has left her room ready in all these four years," said elvetienii. Bosshart husbands complain: "I understand the situation, as long as we registered our request to Government in 2002 and have already paid 9000 USD to take on Alexandra. After several days elvetienii have never met the situation. That, especially for the "intermediary" in Romania had, again, about them and they proposed a new deal. This time, in a letter sent recently, Dan Aurelian Vasile them another child. He advised her Swiss family establish a domicile in Romania, to establish a company here, to "go 2-3 times in Romania" and "we will have custody of the child as soon as we get a permanent residence permit. Finally, elvetienii were warned that this "adoption" costs amounted to approximately 9.000-12.000 dollars. Elvetienii say they are not alone in this stage - several families in our country have started such efforts to adoption of a child from Romania. And all received pictures of "goods".

Aurel Dan Vasile, who represents the adoption of "Romanian New Family", is known in industry as a lawyer. Man, however, was not found in records Bucharest Bar. The company is "apartment" in Pantelimon neighborhood. And the association does not answer the phone no.

About the new attacks of traffickers of children Romanians, Romanian Adoptions Office (ORA) said that "they no longer have any chance, especially as legislation has changed recently, and supervises the situation closely." Secretary of State Teodora Bertzi, chief of TIME says more, that has sent the Prosecutor and the Ministry of Administration and Interior several cases in which there is suspicion of trafficking in children. "We work with the Prosecutor on the case, and if Alexandra seems a typical case of what happened in the past in Romania," stated Secretary of State - "Then there were situations in which foreign families were induced in error that would be able to adopt children from Romania in any conditions. That's because intermediaries have speculated carente certain period of moratorium. Confrom Teodora Bertzi, at this moment to insist that families adopt a child from Romania are informed on ORA current legal situation regarding the adoption institution. "I advise on foreign interest to the Romanian Office for Adoptions about the laws, than to go the hands of intermediaries," he said Teodora Bertzi.
razvan.popa @ gandul.info
 
http://www.gandul.info/actual/traficantii-orfani-romania-ii-tepuiesc-straini-poze-prezentari-t.html?3927; 257668

==============================================================================================================

Dupa blocarea adoptiilor internationale

 

Traficantii de orfani din Romania ii tepuiesc pe straini cu poze si prezentari tip teleshopping

de Razvan POPA | 22 MARTIE 2006

 

 

Dupa ce au fost o simpla marfa de export pentru traficanti, unii copii din orfelinatele romanesti sunt folositi acum pe post de momeala pentru dat tepe la straini. Nou-nascutii au devenit tinte pentru traficantii de carne vie, iar cei de cativa ani sunt prezentati, in fotografii, ca un produs de taraba. Pozele sunt folosite pentru a-i pacali pe occidentalii disperati sa adopte un copil. De regula, sumele scoase dupa o "prezentare de piata" sunt de ordinul a cateva mii de dolari.

Dupa 2005 - cand autoritatile romane au impus o blocada totala in sistemul adoptiilor - traficantii au pretins ca au gasit "portite" prin care sa continue "exportul" copiilor romani. M. si D. Bosshart sunt cetateni elvetieni. Cei doi au trait, de curand, un cosmar romanesc. Povestea elvetienilor incepe prin 2002.

Atunci, in Romania, la Giurgiu, se nastea micuta Alexandra. Certificatul de nastere poarta data de 6 martie 2002.

In acea perioada in Romania era in vigoare moratoriul prin care adoptiile internationale erau blocate. Dupa doua luni de la nasterea micutei,la Autoritatea Nationala pentru Protectia Copilului si Adoptie a fost depus un dosar de catre un anumit Dan Aurel Vasile. Persoana figureaza ca presedinte al Asociatiei Romanian New Family - organizatie "de apartament" situata in Pantelimon, dar care apare intr-o hotarare de guvern ca fiind acreditata pe adoptii. Dan Vasile dorea atunci adoptarea unui copil, fara sa precizeze numele sau locul in care se afla acesta. In august 2002 - la trei luni de la depunerea dosarului - Dan Vasile fixeaza "tinta" si mentioneaza in dosar numele Alexandrei. In aceasta perioada - contrar legislatiei - o familie din Elvetia ajunge in Romania si ia contact cu micuta internata in institutia statului! O viziteaza la caminul din Giurgiu, desi Alexandra deja figura in grija unor asistenti maternali. Mai mult, desi nu exista consimtamantul mamei, desi copilul fusese considerat drept neadoptabil, iar in Romania era perioada de "embargo" in ceea ce priveste adoptiile internationale, dosarul "Romanian New Family" nu a fost nici clasat si nici respins! Asa s-a ajuns ca elvetienii sa creada ca vor deveni parintii adoptivi ai fetitei. Cei doi s-au indragostit la prima vedere de micuta aflata la centrul de plasament din Giurgiu. Au primit asigurari de la "Romanian New Family" ca problema va fi rezolvata. Ba chiar au primit si cateva fotografii. In cele trei imagini, fetita este prezentata ca la piata - o persoana imbracata intr-un halat (probabil o asistenta) arata copilul ca pe un trofeu. Il tine la departare ca la o prezentare de produs, gen teleshopping. Asistenta zambeste, fetita e speriata si pare ametita. Imaginile sunt facute profesionist, in sensul in care pe fundal nu exista vreun obiect care sa demaste locatia. Aceste imagini au ajuns la familia din Elvetia care a inceput sa amenajeze "camera fiicei". Au amenajat-o degeaba, deoarece fetita nu a mai ajuns in Elvetia. Un tribunal a admis cererea unei familii de romani care o doreau pe Alexandra.

Elvetienii sustin ca pentru adoptarea micutei din Giurgiu au platit 9.000 de euro! "Acest copil traieste in inimile noastre si camera ei a ramas pregatita in toti acesti patru ani", spun elvetienii. Sotii Bosshart se plang: "Nu intelegem situatia, atata timp cat am inregistrat cererea noastra la Guvernul Romaniei in 2002 si am platit deja 9.000 USD pentru a o adopta pe Alexandra". In urma cu cateva zile, elvetienii nu au mai suportat situatia. Asta, mai ales pentru ca "intermediarul" din Romania luase, din nou, legatura cu ei si le propusese o noua afacere. De aceasta data, intr-o scrisoare trimisa de curand, Dan Aurelian Vasile le propunea un alt copil. El sfatuia familia elvetiana sa isi stabileasca un domiciliu in Romania, sa infiinteze o firma aici, sa "treaca de 2-3 ori prin Romania" si "vom avea custodia copilului imediat ce vom obtine permisul de sedere permanenta". In fine, elvetienii erau avertizati ca pentru aceasta "adoptie" "costurile se ridica la aproximativ 9.000-12.000 de dolari". Elvetienii mai spun ca nu sunt singurii in acest stadiu - "mai multe familii din tara noastra au inceput astfel de demersuri in vederea adoptiei unui copil din Romania". Si toti au primit fotografii cu "marfurile".

Dan Aurel Vasile, cel care reprezinta societatea de adoptii "Romanian New Family", este cunoscut "in bransa" ca avocat. Omul, insa, nu a fost de gasit in inregistrarile Baroului Bucuresti. Firma este "de apartament" in cartierul Pantelimon. Iar la telefonul asociatiei nu raspunde nimeni.

Despre noile atacuri ale traficantilor de copii romani, Oficiul Roman de Adoptii (ORA) spune ca "acestea nu mai au nicio sansa, mai ales ca legislatia s-a schimbat de curand, iar Oficiul supravegheaza atent situatia". Secretarul de stat Teodora Bertzi, seful ORA spune, mai mult, ca a trimis Parchetului si Ministerului Administratiei si Internelor mai multe cazuri in care exista suspiciuni de trafic de copii. "Colaboram cu Parchetul pe aceste spete, iar cazul Alexandrei mi se pare un caz tipic pentru ceea ce s-a intamplat, in trecut, in Romania", declara secretarul de stat - "Atunci au existat situatii in care familii straine erau induse in eroare ca ar fi putut sa adopte copii din Romania in orice conditii. Asta pentru ca intermediarii au speculat anumite carente din perioada moratoriului". Confrom Teodorei Bertzi, in acest moment familiile care insista sa adopte un copil din Romania sunt informate de ORA privind situatia juridica actuala in ceea ce priveste institutia adoptiei. "Ii sfatuim pe straini sa se intereseze la Oficiul Roman pentru Adoptii despre conditiile legale, decat sa mearga pe mana intermediarilor", a mai spus Teodora Bertzi.
razvan.popa@gandul.info
 

The Baby Houses and Orphanages of Kazakhstan

The Baby Houses and Orphanages of Kazakhstan

By Cindy Harding
Executive Director, World Partners Adoption, Inc.
www.worldpartnersadoption.org

Kazakhstan has an excellent reputation of caring for their children who live in their orphanage system. Often when the children leave the orphanage or baby house through adoption, there are many bittersweet tears from the staff and caregivers, since they love these children so dearly and will miss them- yet they only want them to have a happy life. When post placement reports are sent back and pictures of the children are given to the baby house, the caregivers remember each of the children by name and are delighted to see them thriving in their new homes. Many US doctors have commented on the good care of the children upon their arrival home, and one is even quoted as saying, "We aren't sure what Kazakhstan does right, or what other countries do wrong." They are amazed at how well the children look upon arrival home after being adopted, saying these children do not look like typical children who have lived in an orphanage setting.

There are multiple reasons that children are living in these institutionalized settings, called Baby houses in Kazakhstan, such as relinquishment or termination of parental rights, abandonment, death of birth parents, economic strife, unwed birth mothers, as well as a number of other reasons. When children are abandoned, either at birth or later, the custodianship and guardianship bodies of the local Departments of Education try to locate the child's birth parents, but often time the birth mother has left false information, making it impossible to locate her. In some regions, Hospital officials will go to the address that the birth mother gave at the time of admission, but often they are unsuccessful in finding the birth mother or any other family members. In the case of abandonment, the Akim, Hospital or Department of Health (Depending on the region) will write up an abandonment act which will allows the child to be placed into the Baby House. If a child is considered to be a "foundling" meaning literally "found" outside of the police station, hospital, park, etc. with no identifying information, the Ministry of Internal Affairs (the Militia) will try to find the birth parents or some family member who can be responsible for the child. If they are unsuccessful in their attempts to find a family member, the child is placed for adoption. The children must be on the local registry for 3 months and then on the national registry for 3 more months before they can be adopted internationally. The youngest child to be adopted from Kazakhstan will be at least 6 months old. Not all of the children living in the orphanages are cleared for adoption because parents have written a letter or family comes to visit them from time to time.

All orphans from birth up to 3-4 years old are placed into the Baby Houses regardless of whether they were born in a maternity hospital, the children's hospitals, sent from the hospital or Center for "foundlings" which is regulated by the Ministry of Internal affairs, or directly from their homes where the parental rights have been terminated or relinquished. Once the children are 4 years old, they are moved to a Preschool Orphanage for children age 4-7. The children age 7-16 live in an Orphanage, which is sometimes called a Children's Home. The Baby Houses typically house 60-130 children at a time depending on the budget provided by the Department of Health. Some orphanages in the larger cities can have as many as 400 children residing.

The Baby Houses are unique due to their staff and daily routines with the children. The baby houses are staffed with doctors and nurses and specialists such as speech therapists, physical therapists, neurologists, massage therapists, music teachers, and nannies. It is similar to a residential medical facility. The children have three full meals per day along with 3 snacks per day. Infants, of course, are on their own feeding schedule. The children are divided into groups according to their ages. There are typically 8-12 children per group depending on their age and there is one primary caregiver per group and 2 nannies to care for them at all time. Each child is assigned a primary caregiver so the child is able to establish a bond with someone in the important early stages of brain development and attachment. The daily routine of the children, while a very strict schedule, allows them to engage in playtime with their friends, attend music lessons twice per week, learn dances and poems, and work with a speech therapist every day for up to 30 minutes! Children under one year of age work with a massage therapist and physical therapist routinely to
aid them in developing gross motor skills and muscle development. This interaction with these specialists provides stimulation, which allows them to learn musical patterns, sing memorized songs, enhance gross and fine motor skills, improve receptive and expressive language, and have interaction that will help them with their cognitive and emotional development. Around the holidays or special occasions the children wear costumes and will put on performances to a variety of audiences!

The Preschool Orphanages are much like the baby house in terms of staff, but there are more teachers because the children have a school like setting where they learn academic skills. There are many different activities that include things like arts and crafts, physical play, dance lessons, music lessons, and many other activities to keep the children engaged and well rounded. The children age 7-16 live in orphanages, or Children's Home. The children attend school starting at the age of 7. Up to Middle School, they have their own special school within their setting and do not attend regular school. For the few children who attend High School, they attend the local High School in the city where they live. In the orphanages, in addition to their school, the children also attend music lessons and dance, participate in competitions, participate in sports, and go on field trips.

The Baby Houses and Orphanages are often very stark in the outside appearance, however the inside walls are typically covered with colorful murals of animals and characters which creates a child friendly environment. The baby houses and orphanages are very clean and free of debris, and toys are neatly stored on shelves. The building is usually a two-story facility that has a full kitchen, laundry room, play rooms, therapy rooms, and bedrooms where the children are grouped by age. Several children sleep in the same room in separate beds, which are lined up in rows. The outside often has a playground and a covered area that seats many children for outside play. Often times the playground and outside equipment is in need of updating and repair, however, the orphanage budget does not have the money to replace or repair the equipment, so they do the best with what they have.

The workers are very protective of the children's health, as an illness can quickly spread creating an epidemic throughout the entire house. The children are sent to the hospital for fevers and other illness we might consider to be minor because the caregivers are trying to keep all of the children free from getting sick. The workers are also very careful with the people that come into contact with the children and enter the baby house so they can limit the exposure to germs to the children.

Kazakhstan's first lady Sara Alpysovna Nazarbaeva is the President of "Bobek" Children's Foundation, established in 1992, and is the winner of The International I. Dogramachi World Health Organization Prize and The International Unity Prize. She has dedicated her life to underprivileged children, and has taken upon herself the responsibility for thousands of orphaned and handicapped children. She has created this foundation to help mother and child care, provide supervision of foundling homes and orphanages, provide equipment and supplies to schools, aid gifted children from low-income families, and assist to the child health care system. In 1997 she launched the first National Children's Rehabilitation Center and the "SOS Children's Villages of Kazakhstan" which are the family villages for orphans. Mrs. Nazarbaeva plans on building these children's villages so the orphaned children can live in a family setting. These children's villages consist of several houses build together in a group where many children live in one house with several caretakers. Mrs. Nazarbaeva understands the need for the family, and her plans for the children's villages will enable the orphaned children to grow up in a family atmosphere.

With this type of dedication to the children, stemming all the way from the top of the political structure, it is no doubt the children are so well cared for in Kazakhstan. This is a country that deeply loves it's children and wants what is best for them. It is with great honor that adoption agencies are able to work in this beautiful, kind, and compassionate country. We support them by assisting in providing loving homes and care for these precious orphaned children of Kazakhstan who are so loved by their country.
 

 

`Mistaken orphan' to meet lost father after 34 years

`Mistaken orphan' to meet lost father after 34 years
 
 
By Bruce Ward, Canwest News ServiceMay 30, 2009
 
 
OTTAWA - Thirty-four years after he was mistakenly whisked away from a Saigon orphanage, Thanh Campbell - Orphan 32 - is returning to his homeland.
Campbell, one of 57 children spirited from a Saigon orphanage to Canada in April 1975, is returning Saturday to be reunited with his biological father and the brothers who never stopped searching for him after losing him in the chaotic fall of Saigon.
``The anticipation is from something you never think could possibly happen and is actually happening. I just think of my father and how long it has been for him, searching,'' said Thanh, who is travelling with his wife, Karina, their four children, and his adoptive father William Campbell.
The flight arrives Sunday evening, and Thanh expects to meet his father and brothers Monday morning.
``I think, first of all, what's the reaction going to be from family members over there? What's their first impression going to be like? I don't speak the language. How can you express yourself through an interpreter and get them (his biological family) to know you?''
Thanh knows the broad strokes of his early life, told to him by his birth father after discovering him two years ago thanks to an astonishing chain of events.
As Nguyen Ngoc Minh Thanh, he was airlifted to Canada in April 1975, with a copy of his birth certificate tied to his wrist. It showed Thanh's second birthday was still months away.
The child listed as Orphan 32 had been taken to a Saigon orphanage with two of his older brothers because their parents thought it was a safe haven during the fall of the city.
But when they went to reclaim their children, Thanh was gone - mistakenly placed among a group of orphans sent abroad for adoption, likely to the United States.
Thanh was adopted by Rev. William Campbell, a Presbyterian minister, and his wife, Maureen, and grew up in Cambridge, Ont.
But in 2003 he connected with Trent Kilner, who had been on that fateful flight out of Saigon.
The two tracked down 44 of the 57 people on that plane, and after the photos and story of the orphans' 2006 reunion was covered by a Vietnamese magazine, Thanh got an e-mail from someone saying he could be Thanh's brother.
``Everyone see you very very like my brother . . . My father still keep Thanh's birth certificate. If you have some information like that, please contact with us.''
The original and the copy of the birth certificate matched. DNA testing carried out by a Toronto company proved the genetic link. Thanh had found his biological father and family.
Thanh uses the word ``providence'' to describe his astounding journey.
``It's more than just a father reuniting with a son. It goes beyond that. We want to see the country, we want to meet the people. We also want to be able to share who we are.''
Ottawa Citizen

Paris implicated in Zoe's Ark orphan fraud?

Paris implicated in Zoe's Ark orphan fraud?
Sat, 30 May 2009 02:07:25 GMT
Font size :
The Zoe's Ark head Eric Breteau

(Dis) Appearing Women in Nationalist Narratives (Part 1): Interview with Respondent

 
(Dis) Appearing Women in Nationalist Narratives (Part 1): Interview with Respondent A 
Conducted by Bina D’Costa[1], the Australian National University
January, 2000
 I (Bina)  gratefully acknowledge Ms Shahin Akhter’s insights and comments during and after the interview.
 
Opening Note: The following interview was conducted in India.  The respondent was not keen to disclose her identity.  For the sake of ethical research practice, I kept the interview unedited.
RA: It was a big drama.  There were two hundred women waiting for us.  Mother Teresa went there at the beginning of January or December.  It was the new Bangladesh government who invited us there.  She didn’t find any girls there.  She had seen only their hair, petticoat and some other things.  Their hair was cut because they were afraid that they’d commit suicide.  They did brutal things and kept the girls naked.  Many were half naked.  We haven’t seen them in this state.  Therefore, we can’t make any comments.  When I went there on January 21, 1972, I started this temporary house.[1] 
BD: Why were you chosen? Did it have to do anything with your Bengali ethnicity?
RA: I mean, we were not chosen as such.  But we were sent because of our experience.  Hossain Ali, the Pakistani High Commissioner in Calcutta — when Bangladesh came to be on December 16, 1971, it was him who declared that he accepted Bangladesh.  After this, Hossain Ali came and visited Mother.  Then went to Shishu Bhaban.  And then I was in charge of Shishu Bhaban.  He asked Mother, “May I take this sister with me? … To tell you the truth I’ve not been to Bangladesh from 1950 till 1972.  That means for 22 years!  And I have not spoken any Bengali till then.  I did not complete my study in Bengali as well.  I lost complete contact with Bengali! 
BD: Was it difficult for you to communicate in Bengali?
BD: Only to collect the war babies? 
RA: Also to do the relief work.  And he is the one who introduced me to the ministers there.  My Bengali was so bad that I always used half Bengali and half English.  Mujib used to say, “Bangladesher meye, Bangla kotha bolo.” (Bengali girl, speak in Bengali)… But Mujib was a great friend.  I could go to any Ministry without pass and ask for help, whatever I needed.  Most of the things were sent from here.  Only thing was that I needed protection for the sisters.  We were foreigners but we did not look foreigners over there.[3] 
BD: Had it been unsafe for the sisters otherwise? 
RA: Yes.  And also when I went there, no other nuns were working outside, in slums and villages.  They were all working in schools and hospitals.  And they worked in their own convents.  When I went there, I started to work everywhere with the sisters.  We never went less than three to do relief work.  And Mizanur Rahman[4] used to say, “You young girls are going out in the world.  Who’d take care of you if anything happens to you?”  So, I told him, “That’s the only thing I ask you.  To give us protection.”  As a foreigner and a visitor we needed protection from any hooligans or people who wanted to cause problems.  It was our work and I had no fear.  I had very young sisters with me.  One was a Bengali and the others were from Kerala.  So they had to learn Bengali and do the work.  We had so much cooperation from the government!  So there was no objection.  So also, when we took the children in, the government didn’t give us any trouble.  When we started sending the children abroad, they gave us passports for the children.  But they did not know even how the adoption was supposed to be going.  I was doing adoption all the time in India.  So, I had a lot of idea how to do the adoption work.  When I went there in the offices to arrange for the children, I had to help them to prepare certificates so they could leave the country.  And based on that they got the passport to go, as not in adoptions.  For Muslims and Christians, they do not go for adoption, but for foster care.  In India, however, Hindus can adopt Hindu babies.  At that time, in Bangladesh, there were no laws for adoption for the Muslims.  At least I don’t thing so… we were the first one to do the adoption, and the children had no religion so to speak.  And in Bangladesh no one was going to adopt them.  Therefore, the government gave us the permission and they gave us the passports.  Even ten days old babies went to Canada.  The only thing is that I had to get a photo, a passport, and book their flight.  They needed to reach the country of destination and from there straight to the hospital.  Many were put in the incubators.  I was there in Bangladesh for two years and eight months and worked in the adoption project… 
BD: What happened to the women who gave away their babies? Do you remember them?
RA: Most of the babies came from the nursing homes.  Midwives, ayas (child-carers) brought the babies.   
BD: Do you remember any of the nursing homes? 
         I know one case, whose father was an engineer.  The whole family was killed.  They were half buried in the sand.  After the Pakistani army moved away, she gained consciousness.  Her story has been written in the Bangladeshi newspapers but of course under a different name.  She didn’t want to have an abortion.  But later on had to give away her baby.  But otherwise, I think everyone went for abortion.  Nobody wanted Pakistani babies.  Nobody!  Neither the parents, nor the government and nor the women…In the course of time, we were getting pregnant women, but we didn’t know who they were violated by: the Pakistani army or by local men.  We always had pregnant girls there. 
         Babies, who the Pakistani army fathered, were all aborted in different clinics.  Otherwise parents couldn’t take the women home.  And they wouldn’t tell anyone if their daughters were raped.  When they realized that their daughters were pregnant they quickly got the babies aborted.  It was all done in secrecy. 
BD: You mentioned that many of the children went to Canada…
RA: Most were sent to Canada.  Some of the babies were sent to France and Sweden as well. 
BD: Have you met any of the Canadian sisters who were working here? 
RA: No.  There were many others who started working in Bangladesh.  But actually we were the first ones to begin work over there. 
BD: During our conversation yesterday you vaguely mentioned a prison where women were kept. Can you tell me more about that? 
RA: No, no! 
BD: Was that in Dhaka? 
RA: Yes, in Dhaka Cantonment.  They were locked up in the Cantonment.  Mother went to see the place.  They took her to see the place.  But not even one girl was there to be seen at that time.  We went with lots of publicity that we were going to work with the girls who had been violated by the Pakistani army.  But when we arrived we found almost no one.  They were all gone.  But we did find lots of babies.  Many of the children were given up for adoption.  We also did a lot of relief work. 
BD: Those were related to women? 
RA: No, in general for everyone.  We also did some rehabilitation work for women on the other side of the Buriganga.[7]  All were Hindu women.  No men, no grown-up boys.  The army killed all the men.  They dug up a big hole where they buried all the men.  And also the grown-up boys.  Women were left alone.  We started a program for helping the women.  I gave each women 5 rupee[8]  to do some small business.  They made a little extra.  Afterwards they continued to work with that small saving.  Then we gave them goose, ducklings, chicks and goats.  For the next three years we helped them to stand on their own feet.  That is how Jagoroni[9] came into being.  It was the “Widows’ Program”.
         For Muslims it was difficult to understand us.  They asked, ‘How can you not get married?  You are violating God’s command.’  Slowly, they also started to understand us through our work.   People were a bit fearful at the beginning.  The Corr[10], Fr. Timm[11]  and Fr. Labe[12] had helped us.
BD: Have you ever worked in any other war-torn country? 
RA: I myself did not.  But others did. 
BD: Was the experience any different from Bangladesh? 
RA: No.  For us, it was nothing new. 
BD: How many of you were there in Bangladesh? 
RA: Six of us were working in Bangladesh.  Rob Chowdhury, the coordinator for rehabilitation work had assisted us.   
BD: Was the number of war babies more in Dhaka? And also the number of abortions? 
RA: Yes.  It still remains as a scar in my heart.  The government allowed abortion on a mass scale.  They didn’t want any Pak child.  Either they were to be aborted or to get out of the country as soon as possible.  We had incubators and we were prepared to take the premature babies. 
BD: Have you requested the women not to abort the children? 
RA: Yes.  We also asked the nursing homes, ‘When the babies are born, please do not throw them to the dustbin.  Bring them to us if they are alive.’  But they didn’t care.  They were interested in the mothers only.  Babies were thrown into the dustbins…you see for any war when they lose the land they want to leave the issue behind.  That is why the Bangladesh government wanted to get rid of the children fathered by the Pakistani army. 
BD: Did the women speak about the actual rape? 
RA: No.  And we also didn’t ask them.  There was a wound.  We tried to rehabilitate them, tried to accept the situation they were in.  And we never asked them to write their names, neither their addresses. Stigma would remain if people knew. 
         Ok.  I am tired.  God bless you. 
BD: Thank you very much for your time.

~
[1] The first orphanage for war babies.
[2] Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the first Prime Minister of the Peoples’ Republic of Bangladesh, who also was called at the time, the father of the nation.
[3] Immediately after the war, there was total chaos in the country.  Law and Order situation was very bad. 
[4] The Relief and Rehabilitation Minister, 1972.
[5] It was clear to me that she didn’t want to reveal any names.
[6] Off the record information about rape by Bengalis.
[7] The major river next to Dhaka city.
[8] Indian currency.
[9] A local handicraft and community shop run by the Missionaries of Charity sisters.
[10] A relief and rehabilitation NGO of East Pakistan.  Now the name has changed to Caritas.
[11] Controversial Human Rights Activist/Priest in Bangladesh. 
[12] One Italian Priest.

Bling Bling Girls scoren voor Unicef

 Bling Bling Girls scoren voor Unicef
Laura, Anouk, Julia en Lisanne, leerlingen van basisschool de Ieme in Veghel hebben met hun actie voor Unicef maar liefst 3778,30 euro opgehaald.

Het viertal, dat zich de Bling Bling Girls noemt, hielden op 30 mei een speciale actiedag waarin workshops, een sponsorloop, een ballonnenwedstrijd en diverse spelletjes geld in het laatje moesten brengen. En dat is dus gebeurd.

Esther Ekkel-Vorstenbosch nam, namens Unicef, woensdag de cheque met het grote geldbedrag in ontvangst. Het geld gaat rechtstreeks naar Joaninha en haar zusje Chica, twee aidswezen uit Mozambique.

Babies for sale

Babies for sale

When Slumdog Millionaire star Rubina Ali was offered for sale with a £200,000 price tag there was worldwide outrage. But it wasn’t a one-off.

A woman offers her daughter for sale, along with a young orphaned boy (below)


This child is special, an Oscar child. So now we want £200k
Dad offers Oscar girl to our Fake Sheik for £200k.
Read
Rubina's dad is an evil liar. I'll do whatever it takes to get her back
By Mazher Mahmood, News of the World investigations editor & Claie Wilson, 23/05/2009
There's a shocking new trend emerging - baby trading. Desperate mothers are selling their kids to the highest bidder. While others get pregnant to order...
The little girl stands out from the other children who are scrabbling about. She's barely two years old, with wide chocolate-brown eyes and a shock of black curls. Her mother looks tired and her young face is prematurely wrinkled. She jiggles her daughter from hip to hip, and the toddler giggles in delight. She's too young to be bothered by the dirty blankets heaped on the ground around her or the tatty old mattress on the floor. And she's too young to understand the business transaction being discussed between her mother, grandmother and the two men who have just arrived. Which is just as well, as the two women want to sell her - for the grand price of £8,000.
This is the reality of the growing European baby trade, and when Fabulous decided to investigate, we were horrified at how easy it was to buy a child.
Within a couple of hours of making enquiries, our investigators had been taken to a tiny village in a remote area of Bulgaria. Here, working adults earn less than one euro a day (around 90p), so parents are trading the only thing they have of any value - their children.
Buyers range from childless couples desperate for a baby to love, to paedophile rings. Children can be sold from anything upwards of £1,200. For families too poor to feed or clothe themselves, finding a buyer willing to fork out thousands for a child that they can't afford to raise, is like winning the lottery. Sadly, this often means they don't question their child's prospective new 'family' too closely.

Recently, baby trading hit the headlines when the News of the World revealed the father and uncle of Slumdog Millionaire star Rubina Ali tried to sell her to reporters. Her family valued her at £200,000 - because she wasn't just a child - but an 'Oscar child'. The sale was stopped and her father was arrested and questioned by police in Mumbai. He has since been released, but the investigation is ongoing and Rubina's fate remains undecided.
In countries such as Bulgaria, China and India, poverty is rife. Increasingly, children are being seen as a commodity to be sold to the highest bidder. As demand now outstrips supply, in some countries women are getting pregnant to order and selling their unborn babies to any willing purchaser.
Kate Allen, director of Amnesty International UK says: "Poverty is the main cause. We need to restore people's basic human dignity to have any chance of preventing this practice."
Back in the remote Bulgarian village, the mother is agitated and keen for our investigators to agree the price for her daughter, who we have been told is called Desislava.
"I want to give you this child," the girl's young mother says. "It's hungry all day, it's miserable. What can I do?"
There are a handful of other children - many of them partially clothed, all of them filthy - wandering around outside the ramshackle house that is home to an entire family and their livestock. It's not clear if the children are brothers and sisters or unfortunates with nowhere else to go.
"We are so poor," adds the baby's grandmother, a 70-year-old woman who is standing barefoot next to us. "The children are hungry. We have no bread, we have nothing."
It's a shocking scene - and almost unbelievable to think that in 2009, families are so destitute they would sell their own flesh and blood.

As our investigator talks to his interpreter, the desperate grandmother offers a 'cut-price deal' for another child.
"This is Dimitar," she says, pointing to a scruffy barefoot toddler. "He's an orphan and we can't afford to raise him." Then she demands 10,000 lev (£4,000).
Not once do either women ask - or seem to care - what would happen to the children if these men bought them. As our investigators make their excuses and leave, the grandmother, sensing the deal is off, offers them a bargain.
"You can have the boy for just 6,000 lev [£2,400]. You can take him with you now." It seems no price is too low.
Baby trafficking was only made a crime in Bulgaria in 2004 and the maximum punishment is just two years in prison. No surprise then, that when a child can be sold for thousands of pounds, the country has become infamous as a human supermarket.
Some poverty-stricken families hand over babies to local loan sharks to pay off their debts, who in turn sell them to the highest bidder. Other women get pregnant deliberately to sell to childless couples around the world. Like the woman our investigators found in a town two hours from Bulgaria's capital, Sofia. She claims to have sold one child, and now six months pregnant, she wants to sell her unborn baby too.

This pregnant mother of five wants to sell her baby as soon as it's born
"I have five kids," she told our reporters. "But they have no shoes, no clothes and no beds. I'm sick and my husband has asthma. Our money goes to pay debts at shops as we buy food on credit and we're left with nothing. In winter there isn't even wood to burn. We live in poverty, like dogs."
For this mother, it seems getting pregnant and selling her babies is the only way she can survive. Our reporter informed local authorities of both the cases we discovered in Bulgaria and they assured us they would investigate further.
Children's charity UNICEF says Eastern Europe has one of the biggest markets for child sex and domestic slaves. In 2006, 10 Bulgarians were sentenced to up to six years imprisonment for selling 23 babies to French families for around £4,500 each. One 16-year-old Romanian girl was arrested after she complained a British woman who offered to pay her £9,000 for her baby, only paid £7,000.
Police have also investigated hundreds of similar cases involving Bulgarian and Romanian babies being sold in neighbouring Greece and Italy.
Tragically, most cases go unreported. No one knows exactly how many children are bought and sold every year. Save The Children estimates it's close to 1.2 million - with the gangs involved making up to £16billion profit a year.
"There are still millions of children in both rich and poor countries who are living in horrific conditions of humiliation and abuse," says Bill Bell, Save The Children's head of protection. "Across the world there are currently 1.8 million children trapped in the sex trade, over a million children risking their lives working in mines, and millions more, some as young as six, forced to work up to 15-hour days as domestic workers. These children are treated as commodities, and can be lent or sold to other owners without warning."
For the criminal gangs it's easy money and, as our investigation shows, it can take as little as two hours to find a baby for sale.
"Despite police activity, as long as you have the money, you can buy a baby or young child in Bulgaria," says one Bulgarian informant. "No one asks whether you're a child abuser. It's like buying something from a market stall."
Bulgaria is not the only country where child trafficking is rife. Romania, Guatemala and India also have a thriving trade. Some of these children may end up as part of a loving family - so desperate for a baby, that they resorted to this horrific underworld - but most will be used and abused, bought and sold time and time again until ill-health or death gets to them.
And it seems although the authorities know this is a growing problem, there is very little they can do to stop it.
Adrian Lovett, director of campaigns at Save The Children says: "Children in Eastern Europe and across the world are bought and sold as if they are commodities to be used as slave labour or for sexual gratification. Fabulous' investigation shows how easy it is to traffic children - and that it can be cheaper to buy a child than a second-hand car. How can that be right? Those who trade in children must be made accountable."
Save the Children can be contacted at Savethechildren.org.uk or on 020 7012 6400 (or 00 44 20 7012 6400 outside the UK). UNICEF can be contacted at Unicef.org.uk. For Amnesty International, visit Amnesty.org.uk.
'I want to give my baby away'

Across the border in Romania, another mother has advertised her unborn baby in the small ads of a local newspaper.
Marusia Moraru, 39, placed an ad which read: "Family with three beautiful and smart children, wife five months pregnant. We are looking for a Christian family with no children to take the baby for adoption. We want a serious and responsible family."
Marusia claims she doesn't want money for the unborn baby, believed to be a boy, but her advertisement has caused an international outcry. In an exclusive interview with Fabulous, she insists: "I don't want him. I don't feel anything for him. I want whoever we choose to be at the birth and to take the baby straight from the hospital bed. This baby inside me is not a person yet, so I don't have any responsibility other than to find it a good home."
Even more bizarre is the reason behind Marusia's baby giveaway - her husband, Marian, 40, has decided to become a monk."It wasn't until I was five months pregnant that Marian made his decision. I support him in it, but I can't take care of another baby alone.
"There has been a strong reaction to our advertisement, but we only want what is best for our child."
Marusia has three other children: daughters, Regina, 15, and Malika, 17, and a son Kelemen, 10. She claims that her fourth pregnancy was unplanned and unwanted. "I discovered the pregnancy at eight weeks, but I'm Catholic and my religion views abortion as a crime."
It is also a crime to try to arrange a private adoption in Romania, and the couple are soon to be interviewed by social service inspectors. Child protection agency manager Florin Ion says: "It's illegal and practically impossible for a family to propose to whom their child should be given for adoption."
But Marusia insists that she is doing nothing wrong. "I know that a lot of mothers will find it hard to understand," she says. "But the baby will have a better life. There are so many kind, loving families out there." There's been huge interest in Marusia's unborn child, and she admits that she and her husband has been secretly conducting interviews for prospective 'parents.'
"We've been speaking to different couples," she says. "We'll have to meet the parents of the couple that take our baby because it's important it is loved by a whole family," she pauses, then adds defiantly: "We won't be rushing into any decision. It is our baby's future, after all."
Additional reporting: Amanda Cable Photography: Getty Images, Europics at [cen]


Your comments
This article has 12 comments
These so called baby traders, are nothing more than than the slave traders of old. A child is not a commodity to be brought and sold to the highest bidder, it's a wonderful and unique gift to be loved and cherished. There are many people in this world who are unable to have children, who would give an unloved and unwanted child a home without having to pay for it. I agree with Elaine on this one.
These so called celebritities who adopt these children are not really intrerested in the child they've adopted, to them it's like shopping for things that they will never really use, but must have them anyway. They have a nanny to look after them. These adopted children are really just status symbols.
Lucy may your dream come true.
By Lorna Wanstall. Posted May 29 2009 at 6:51 AM.
Brenda is right. This ethnic group, familiar all over East Europe, has long standing traditions in selling people for money. This is for them the ‘normal’ way for obtaining a bride or (as mentioned above) adopts a baby. There is no law which can eradicate this tradition, no matter how inhumane it may seem. Roma are outside the law anyway, having a semi nomadic existence with main profits in burglary and prostitution.
By whasaap. Posted May 27 2009 at 8:14 AM.
its a great pity adoption is not ratified in these countrys - as mum to a adopted daughter i can put hand on heart and say our adoption is 100% legal and my dd is very loved by both her birth mum and I

this is such a scary article to see and i hope that the future will bring an end to child trafficing
By CAROL. Posted May 26 2009 at 11:36 AM.
This is one of the saddest things I think I have ever read. I can't help but feel sorry for both parties involved – the women so destitute that they consider selling their own flesh and blood and the childless couples so desperate for a baby that they'll resort to the dark world of child trafficking. But most tragic of all is that, more often than not, these poor babies will be sold into a world of abuse or slavery. Thank goodness for reports like this, which highlight such horrors and hopefully help bring them to an end.
By Katherine. Posted May 26 2009 at 11:24 AM.
well, brenda, that is precisely why babies are being sold, because some people cant have any of their own.
By nevermind. Posted May 25 2009 at 2:02 PM.
What has happened to our world these days? Buying and selling babies... this makes me sick!!! We are human being for God sake!!
By Allen. Posted May 25 2009 at 8:04 AM.
To Mr.Georgiev,please,don't be Bulgarian,dear!Bulgaria doesn't need people like you!
By Bulgarian1. Posted May 24 2009 at 10:02 PM.
I am so ashamed to be called contemporary Bulgarian :(
By Georgiev. Posted May 24 2009 at 5:04 PM.
Well can i say

I think this is evil, no child should be sold at all
their are couples who want children and can't

they are the most evil the will pay when the lord ask them why
By brenda. Posted May 24 2009 at 4:35 PM.
I am not familiar with the situation in Romania or India, but don't you think that in Bulgaria at every corner you can buy a baby! The pictured people are not even Bulgarian ethnicity. They are known in the country as a winner of the problems. All efforts of the state to educate and integrate failed, due to simple reason that they are undemanding to stay in school, they do not want to work ... The state organized many sex education programs for the use of contraceptives and the like, in order to reach the many families who can not feed their children. I remember state projects, which literally gave state houses of representatives of this minority, but a year later these houses were like sheds!
One should not think, the money from the report will feed the other children! No! Most likely it will be spend for buying alcohol, gold jewelry or a car! In their ethnicity it is normal to buy brides, and their weddings continue few days with around 200 - 300 guests! They give 10 000 - 20 000 euros for a beautiful bride (of course uneducated - it is important to be able to steal, for example) and another 5 000 - 10 000 euros for a wedding, and then complain that they can not feed children who continually born!
I just want to say - do not evaluate their ways, breaking them trough the prism of your values! These people are not like you and us and never wanted to be!
By a Bulgarian. Posted May 24 2009 at 3:26 PM.
What about all the poor kids who live in the UK who lived in poverty and have ended up in care? Yes, the mothers who sell their babies are sick, but the mothers who buy these babies instead of fostering or adopting one/some of the thousands of kids in care in the UK are just as bad. Angelina and Madonna are making it too stylish to have a handbag baby from overseas.
By Elaine. Posted May 24 2009 at 12:57 PM.
for 17 years now my husband and i have tried for a child,reading this makes me feel sooo frustrated :o(
By lucy. Posted May 24 2009 at 7:20 AM.