Home  

Fear, frustration as a Minnesotan adoptee tries to prove her citizenship

As deportations are happening across the country, one local woman has her own worries. She was adopted as a baby and wanted to make sure she had citizenship papers. That started a domino effect, leading to fear and frustration. Now, Astrid-Ira McCarthy says she hopes her case serves as a warning for others to get their paperwork together. 

According to what she has of her original adoption records, McCarthy's parents adopted her from India as a baby in 1989. She grew up in Minnesota. She said she grew up having no reason to believe she was not always a U.S. citizen, and that hasn't changed in light of her new discovery. 

"I'm no less American than I was when I showed up here at 6 months," McCarthy said. 

She always assumed her citizenship documents were in order. But when she went to apply for a passport, she realized she didn't have everything she needed. 

"I didn't even know I needed this naturalization document to get the passport. Because we went to go get my birth certificate, but it says right on it that this isn't proof of citizenship. That's how we went through, got through everything, and figured out I needed this document," McCarthy said. 

Let’s shape the Switzerland of tomorrow

We are no longer accepting applications for the following position: “Legal Intern in Private International Law”.

ADOPTED FROM ANOTHER COUNTRY ON COOPERATION WITH THE CHILDREN'S

ADOPTEDFROM ANOTHER COUNTRYON COOPERATION WITH THE CHILDREN'S

COUNTRIES OF ORIGIN

 

Elisabeth wanted to know the truth about her own adoption. After two years of searching, she was not only reunited with her mother, but she also found an unknown adoption archive.

Illegal adoptions


 

In January 2022, Elisabeth Fjalsett (49) and her husband Henrik Fjalsett are at home in Arendal when they watch the documentary series "Norway Behind the Facade" about Norwegian foreign adoptions.  


 

The program uncovers several objectionable aspects of adoptions from abroad. Both unethical and criminal methods have been used to find children who are later adopted to Norway. 

My Adoption Story

It's important to me that I share my adoption story with you. If I can help even just one person feel a little less alone by sharing my story, it's worth it. My story is ever evolving and I invite you to follow my journey by subscribing to my mailing list.


My Story

My story started in India, on February 12, 1992. It was the day I was born, and the day my birth mother placed me for adoption.

 

The story I grew up with went something like this: My birth mother wasn’t married so she had to leave her village, give birth to me, and place me for adoption all in secret. The only other person who knew of her pregnancy was her mother, my birth grandmother. I had to be a secret to those in her village because if anyone found out she would have been kicked out, or worse, killed.

Breaking barriers: Encouraging older child adoption in Bengal - The Times of India

KOLKATA: Bengal has one of the highest rates of child adoption in the country but couples continue to be reluctant to adopt children who are six years or older.

 

Functionaries of Atmaja, an association for adoptive parents that was formed 25 years ago to share their experiences with couples seeking to adopt and answer their queries on procedures before the adoption and challenges thereafter, said most couples were willing to wait up to four years after submitting their application for adoption when they can become a parent in a matter of weeks if they agree to adopting an older child.

"Couples usually go for adoption when they have spent 10 years to have a child. That means they are already in their late 30s or early 40s. If they were to adopt a six-seven year-old child, it could happen in a matter of days as there are many children of that age waiting for adoption. Also, the age gap between the parents and the child would be less. Unfortunately, most couples prefer to wait for years to adopt a child who is younger. We are trying to counsel parents to adopt older children because they too deserve a home," said former Jadavpur University prof and adoptive parent Nilanjana Gupta who was the founder chairperson of Atmaja.
 

For many, the wait can make them ineligible as the combined age of the husband and wife adopting a child of under 2 years cannot exceed 85 years. For a child of 2-4 years, the maximum combined age of adopting parents is 90 years. Also, the keenness to adopt only children below four years leaves many older kids without a home.

 

"We also tell couples seeking to adopt that one of the major dilemmas that parents face over when and how to disclose to the children that they are adopted is not there in the case of older children as they already know they are being adopted," said Anup Dewanji, a retired prof at ISI and an adoptive parent who is now chairman of Atmaja.

Saumeta Medhor of adoption agency The Indian Society for Sponsorship & Adoption, says the biggest challenge is couples want to adopt a child who is a clean slate with no memories. "A child of six-seven years will have memories of the biological family or past experiences. Only 1% of couples look for an older child and they do so because they are ineligible for someone younger," she said.

Test2

Testing number two

Test 7th April

Test

Advocates for Children in Therapy

Ronald Federici


 



Ronald Steven Federici makes the claim that he is “regarded as the country’s expert in the neuropsychological evaluation and treatment of children having multi-sensory neurodevelopmental impairments.”

Federici has denied that he is an Attachment Therapist and sometimes avoids the term “Attachment Disorder” (AD) that is widely used by other Attachment Therapists. He instead claims to be a “developmental neuropsychologist,” specializing in the treatment of “institutional autism” (which he also calls “post-traumatic autism,” or “post-institutional autistic syndrome”). His broad range of signs for the alleged disturbances, and the treatment he recommends for them, nevertheless resemble those routinely proferred by Attachment Therapists to diagnose and treat AD. (The diagnoses he uses, as well as AD, are not recognized by conventional psychology or psychiatry.) All that notwithstanding, ACT believes him to be an Attachment Therapist (see our definition).

This BBC Horizon documentary (see below) illustrates Federici’s highly controlling methods for creating “attachment” between parent and child, with attachment considered demonstrable only by a child’s unquestioning obedience. Also note that another therapeutic goal is to remake a child’s personality mirror that of his parents.

BBC Horizon “Taming the Problem Child” (2001) featuring Ronald Federici
(Transcript, with critical commentary by Peter Fonagy)

Pasted Graphic 3

For years — and as recently as 2008 — Federici has claimed to be licensed by the Virginia Medical Board, when in fact he is licensed by the Virginia Board of Psychologists (both as a clinical and a school psychologist). Moreover, he has laid claim to several “diplomate” or “fellow” credentials which appear to have little or no general acceptance by, or recognition within, the psychology profession (possible “vanity boards”):

 

  • American Board of Professional Neuropsychology (ABPN)
  • American College of Professional Neuropsychology [same as above, but he lists it separately]
  • American Board of Medical Psychotherapists (ABMP)
  • Fellow (in Advanced Psychopharmacology), International College of Prescribing Psychologists (ICPP)
  • Fellow (in Advanced Clinical Psychopharmacology), ACAAP [not clarified, but neither American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry nor Air Cargo Agents Association of Pakistan]
  • American Board of Disability Analysts (ABDA)
  • American Board of Medical Consultants
  • American Academy of Behavioral Medicine
  • National Academy of Neuropsychology
  • American Board of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy [sometimes he lists it as Therapists]


There is no evidence that Ronald Federici possesses a medical degree.

While one must have either a PsyD degree or a PhD from an accredited school to be licensed as a clinical psychologist in Virginia, Federici’s publicly available biographies shed no light on where and when his qualifying degree was obtained. He does not appear, as asserted in his Curriculum Vitae, to have a most unusual “dual doctorate” — or indeed any doctorate — from the University of Illinois or the University of Chicago. In times past, he has claimed an EdD and an MBA from Shaftesbury University, a diploma mill in England. There is evidence of a dissertation for work toward a PsyD from the Illinois School of Professional Psychology in the 1980s, but curiously he has not listed this school in his CV.

Federici has touted affiliations with Dr Charles H. Zeanah and Sir Michael Rutter, prominent attachment theorists and researchers, and particularly with their respectable studies of children adopted from Romanian orphanages (before Romania stopped foreign adoptions in 2004). However, neither of these individuals have publicly commented on Federici’s recommended interventions for children, nor accepted that their research data validate either his theories or his proposals for identifying disorders.

Neuropsychological and Family Practice Associates (in McLean, Virginia; recently restaffed and relocated from Alexandria, Virginia) is wholly owned by Federici, and he is CEO of Care for Children International. In 2007, he filed for bankruptcy to discharge his personal guarantees of business debts for his practice. The bankruptcy filing came shortly after he tried, and failed, to gain legal guardianship over one of his adopted children, who was an adult at the time, and fees were awarded to the child’s attorney.

For three years, 2008-2011, Federici has made many legal, and extra-legal, attempts to silence ACT’s revelations of his methods and philosophy, and to shut down this webpage in particular. For a report on these, see News and also the Child Myths blog.