Home  

E-Mail Exchange with Mia Fwd: Searches

---------- Forwarded message ---------

From: Mia Dambach

Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 at 6:03 PM

Subject: RE: Searches

To: Arun Dohle

Aangekondigd onderzoek naar illegale adoptie maakt veel los

Aangekondigd onderzoek naar illegale adoptie maakt veel los

16 december 2018

Op Schiphol komen drie stewardessen aan met weeskinderen (1972) HH/SPAARNESTAD PHOTO

GESCHREVEN DOOR

Helma Coolman en Ben Meindertsma

For many, international adoption isn't just a new family. It's the loss of another life.

In 1978 I was adopted from South Korea by a white, Christian couple in the United States. Like me, thousands of Korean children have been sent to homes all over the world since the end of the Korean War. In 2010, when I traveled back to South Korea for the first time since my adoption, I realized that the "motherland" I know in the United States — the one that "rescued" me 40 years ago — has actually stripped me of my own heritage.

Related: 30 years later, this Korean adoptee finds ‘home’ again

This isn't unique to me. The US has used children to advance dominant racial, religious and political ideals at the expense of the oppressed and the poor for a long time. And it continues today. The heartwrenching family separation policy at the border that made headlines last year is just one example that has put children at risk for ending up in foster care or adoption, rather than reunification with their families.

Here is what I know: I am culturally American. I am racially Asian. I identify as a Korean adoptee. And while my ethnicity is Korean, I grapple with how Korean I actually feel. I came to the US when I was just over six months old, and a couple years later I was naturalized as an American citizen. I have no physical memory of this, only a faded and tattered photograph of me waving the American flag outside my house on the day of my naturalization ceremony.

While my identity has always been a complex personal journey, I became interested in the history of Korean adoption as a doctoral student. I fell in love with archival research and being transported back in time through historical documents. My personal and professional identities came together, and I wanted to know more about my own history as a Korean adoptee.

Beleidigung oder Meinungsfreiheit? (Romania for Export Only)

PFORZHEIM

Beleidigung oder Meinungsfreiheit?

Angeklagte bezeichnet Rechtsanwältin als „Kindertrafikantin“ – Verhandlung wird fortgesetzt

Von Christiane Viehweg Erstellt: 28. Februar 2019, 00:00 Uhr

Pforzheim. Ist es eine Beleidigung und üble Nachrede, eine Rechtsanwältin – Dr. Oana Krichbaum, Ehefrau des Bundestagsabgeordneten Gunther Krichbaum – als „Kinderfabrikantin“ und „Kindertrafikantin“ zu bezeichnen, die Kinderhandel betrieben habe, und dem Ehemann Kenntnis zu unterstellen? Sie mit Pädophilen und Kinderhändlern zu vergleichen? Oder gehört das zur freien Meinungsäußerung? Mit dieser Frage beschäftigte sich am Mittwoch das Pforzheimer Amtsgericht.

Hill Briefing Highlights Unregulated Transfers Or “Re-Homing”

On Thursday, February 28, 2019, Congressman Langevin (D-R) and the Congressional Caucus for Foster Youth held a briefing on “Unregulated Custody Transfers of Adopted Youth: Understanding and Preventing “Rehoming.” Panelists included Maureen Flatley, Former Ambassador Susan S. Jacobs, Department of State, Nhi Nguyen, Government Accountability Office (GAO), Trish Maskew, Department of State, Julie Rosicky, International Social Services, and Joy Alessi, Adoptee.

Flatley, who moderated the briefing, stated that adoption is seen as a state issue when it should be an intrastate issue. She said that there must be a federal response to the issue. Jacobs said the “rehoming” of children needs to stop. She discussed the importance of protecting children, strengthening home studies, and studying the families who are adopting. She also said that there are more protocols when adopting a dog from a shelter then there are on adopting a child.

The topic received some national recognition after a 2013 Reuters report that analyzed posts over the internet over a five-year period. The posts involved making children available online from one family to another. The vast majority of children subjected to such postings were adopted from overseas. The State Department oversees accreditation requirements for agencies and other parties that facilitate international adoptions. Child welfare agencies focus on the adoption of children from foster care. The adoption requirements are more rigorous regarding these child welfare adoptions including minimum training and home studies of perspective parents.

According to the GAO report,

“Many stakeholders we interviewed—including officials from selected states, child welfare and adoption organizations, and adoption agencies— expressed concern with the adequacy of the information provided to prospective parents on the behavioral and mental health conditions of a child adopted internationally. Access to accurate information is critical to ensuring that a family is aware of the type of ongoing support they may need for the child. However, officials from 11 of 19 child welfare and adoption organizations and 5 of 15 adoption agencies said families who adopt internationally often do not receive complete information on a child’s medical and behavioral needs before adopting. State Department officials explained that some low-income countries lack sufficient mental health care providers, making it difficult for international adoption agencies to ensure that children are accurately evaluated prior to adoption.”

Adoptionsdialogens Dag den 23. maj 2019

Adoption Dialogue Day, May 23, 2019

The Day of Adoption Dialogue will be held on Thursday, May 23, 2019 from at. 13: 00-17: 30, we hold the Adoptiondialogens Day at Hotel Scandic, Østergade 10, 8000 Aarhus.

This year's theme is Rights

Preliminary program

Kl. 13:00 Welcome and presentation by Michael Paaske, Chairman of Adoption & Society

War Babies Bangladesh

War-babies

?????

War-babies are referred to here as babies born to Bangali women consequent of their being raped by Pakistani soldiers and other criminals who took advantage of the situation of the war of liberation (March to December 1971). While they are referred to as the 'unwanted children', the 'enemy children', the 'illegitimate children', and more contemptuously, the 'bastards', their birth-mothers are also variously referred to as the 'violated women', the women', the 'distressed women', the 'rape victims', the 'victims of military repression', the 'affected women' and the 'unfortunate' women. Many birth-mothers committed suicide in order to avoid social stigma. Many pregnant women went to India and other places either to terminate pregnancies or arrange deliveries. Many babies were born at home. But unfortunately, accurate or fairly reliable statistics are not available for any of these categories of victims. The situation has led us to make guesswork and presumptions about the number and fate of war-babies. Some limited evidences are to be found in government and non-government organisations records, and in records of foreign missions and missionary organisations.

An Italian medical survey, for example, put the number of victims at 40,000, the London-based International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) estimated it at 200,000. Dr. Geoffrey Davis, a social worker dealing with the management of war-babies at the time argued that the number could go higher. How many victims got pregnant and delivered babies is absolutely uncertain. A government estimate put it at 300,000. But the methodology adopted for reaching this figure was not sound. According to Dr. Davis, about 200,000 women became pregnant. But it was only his guess, not a study.

Newspaper reports of the time, which included interviews of Justice KM Sobhan, Chairperson, BWRP, Sister Margaret Mary of Missionaries of Charity, Dr. Geoffrey Davis, the IPPF personnel such as Odert von Shoultz, reveal that 23,000 abortions were performed at various Dhaka clinics by a team of British, American and Australian doctors, with assistance from some Bangali counterparts. In a sense, it makes the most comprehensive information on abortion in early 1972, following the arrival of the foreign doctors in Dhaka who set up several abortion/delivery clinics referred to as Seba Sadan in Dhaka.

Vacature specialist beleid verwantschapsvragen

Vacancy specialist policy kinship questions

Introduce…

Fiom is the specialist for unwanted pregnancy and descent questions. We offer information and help with issues related to unwanted pregnancy, such as choice questions, renouncing your child and processing an abortion. In addition, we help people in their search for biological family at home and abroad and we manage the KID-DNA Database that makes a match possible with anonymous donorship. We share our knowledge with professionals through our knowledge collection, training and advice. The starting point in Fiom's work is the freedom of choice of unwanted pregnant women and the right to pedigree data.

We are looking for a:

SENIOR SPECIALIST POLICY