Home  

Cuts in foreign adoptions causing anxiety in USA

Cuts in foreign adoptions causing anxiety in USA
Updated 5h 52m ago | Comments9 | Recommend1 E-mail | Save | Print | Reprints & Permissions | Subscribe to stories like this
Kristina Frick of Tampa reacts emotionally while talking about the wait for a visa to bring home a Vietnamese baby. Vietnam approved the boy's adoption in November.
By Jim Stem for USA TODAY
Kristina Frick of Tampa reacts emotionally while talking about the wait for a visa to bring home a Vietnamese baby. Vietnam approved the boy's adoption in November.
 ADOPTION AND FOSTER CARE
More on adoptions 
Jodi Markoff vividly recalls the day she met 5-year-old Phan in a rural Vietnamese orphanage last April. The girl looked terrified.

Markoff gave her a book she had made about her family in Manhattan. After daily visits for a week, Phan was laughing.

"I promised her I would be back," Markoff says. Although she and her husband, Scott, got approval from the Vietnamese government to adopt Phan one month before her visit, the U.S. government hasn't issued the necessary visa to bring Phan to New York.

Phan is still waiting.

Not so long ago, the Markoffs' adoption of Phan might not have been as complicated. But today, international adoptions are increasingly complex for Americans, a trend that is reducing the number of foreign children entering the United States and leading more prospective parents to look into adopting from U.S. foster care.

The face of adoption is being changed by a combination of factors, including more aggressive efforts worldwide to stop illegal child trafficking. As part of those efforts, the U.S. government is more closely scrutinizing requests for U.S. visas for foreign children.

At the same time, several nations that have sent many orphans to the USA — namely China, Russia and South Korea — have begun encouraging more domestic adoptions, and limiting foreign ones, as their economies improve.

As a result, a historic shift in foreign adoptions is underway.

Last year, China, Russia, South Korea and Guatemala — the big four in providing candidates for adoption here — accounted for 70% of the 19,292 children who entered the USA for adoption. Three years ago, those nations accounted for 79% of the 22,728 kids who came here for adoption.

Meanwhile, two African nations, Ethiopia and Liberia, are emerging as popular countries to adopt from, although the number of children they send here remains relatively small.

"This is very much a time of transition," says Michele Bond, deputy assistant secretary for Overseas Citizen Services at the State Department, which issues visas for children entering the USA.

The Hague Adoption Convention, which the U.S. began implementing in April, requires the 75 participating countries to take specific steps to ensure that kids have not been sold or stolen, and that adoptive parents are suitable. It urges countries to try to find domestic homes for its children before looking abroad.

Most child-welfare advocates welcome the initiative.

"It adds a full layer of protection to children, adoptive parents and birth parents," says Tom DiFilipo, president of the Joint Council on International Children's Services, an adoption advocacy group.

However, Diane Kunz, executive director of the Center for Adoption Policy, a research group, says the State Department sometimes is too quick to reject adoptions from nations not meeting the Hague guidelines. She cites Guatemala and Vietnam, which have been among the top 10 foreign sources for international adoptions in the USA.

The State Department, noting rising concerns about baby trafficking, has warned Americans against adopting from those countries. In response, Vietnam and Guatemala have stopped taking applications from Americans.

Kunz says the Hague treaty's strict standards, along with other countries' promotion of domestic adoptions, will cause a continuing decline in international adoptions by Americans, which boomed in the 1990s.

For thousands of U.S. children in foster care, the shift away from foreign adoptions could be a positive development, says Kathy Ledesma, acting project director of AdoptUSKids, a federally funded program that promotes adoptions of foster children.

About 129,000 of the estimated 510,000 children in foster care across the USA were eligible for adoption in 2006, according to the most recent federal data. About 50,000 were adopted that year, compared with 20,679 foreigners adopted by Americans. Children are placed in foster care because of neglect or abuse. The average age is 8; one-third are 3 or younger.

"Increasing numbers (of people interested in adoption) will turn to foster care," Ledesma says. Her program is receiving more calls from people wanting to become foster parents, often the first step toward adopting children in foster care.

However, for the Markoffs and others who have focused on adopting a foreign child, the tightening rules on international adoptions are frustrating.

Jodi and Scott Markoff have two biological sons, ages 7 and 10, but wanted a third child — a daughter. They send Phan packages of clothes and hair clips. They phone every week, often prompting Phan to ask through an interpreter: "Can you come as soon as possible?"

Jodi says Vietnamese families were given first priority to adopt Phan. Because none stepped forward, she doubts Phan would be adopted domestically. Jodi fears Phan is "losing her childhood" in the orphanage.

"This," Jodi says, "is an older child who understands time."

Boy 'does not deserve this'

Kristina Frick also is marking time. She and her husband, Maj. John Frick, a Special Forces officer who has served in Iraq, are waiting for a visa to adopt a Vietnamese baby they call Joshua.

"His room is done. We have everything — diapers, clothes," says Frick, a stay-at-home mom in Tampa. The Fricks have one child, a girl adopted three years ago from U.S. foster care.

Frick says Vietnam approved Joshua's adoption in November, when he was 2 months old, and as soon as she saw his photo, she fell in love with him.

"Children are born in your heart," she says. "It was as if I gave birth to him."

She worries about the crucial early months she's missing as he remains in an orphanage. "This little boy does not deserve this sentence," she says.

Rah Bickley says her 17-month-old son, Sam, who came to the USA in April, has developmental delays that she blames on the four extra months he spent in a Vietnamese facility while U.S. officials investigated.

She says she and her husband, John O'Brien, became dismayed by the U.S. inquiry.

"There was never proof" of irregularities, she says. "We felt betrayed by our own government."

In a stinging report in April, the State Department said Vietnam's adoption system was rife with corruption, baby-stealing and baby-buying.

The report "does not truly reflect the situation in Vietnam," says Cuong Nguyen, spokesman for Vietnam's embassy in Washington. He says Vietnam opposes baby-stealing and has taken steps to stop it, including the arrests of suspected traffickers.

Vietnam has made "significant progress," says DiFilipo, who has met with Vietnamese officials and toured the country to check on its work.

Vietnam has not agreed to the Hague treaty, so adoptions from there are governed by an agreement between it and the USA that expires Sept. 1. Vietnam stopped taking adoption applications from Americans on July 1.

The tougher rules surrounding international adoptions stem from "the world paying attention … in a way it hadn't before," says Adam Pertman, executive director of the Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute, a research group. Besides boosting adoptions from the U.S. foster care system, Pertman says the changes in international adoptions are likely to:

• Promote the adoptions of disabled children. Parents faced with long waits for healthy infants are more willing to consider older kids, such as Phan, or those with disabilities, Kunz says.

• Encourage adoptions from Africa. Adoption agencies report that U.S. families increasingly are asking about adopting children from Africa. Nancylyn Bigonesse, spokeswoman for the Gladney Center for Adoption in Texas, links that interest to changing racial attitudes in the USA and the celebrity effect of Angelina Jolie, who adopted a girl from Ethiopia, and Madonna, who adopted a boy from Malawi.

Bigonesse also notes that many churches are telling parishioners about the needs of orphans in Ethiopia and elsewhere in Africa.

David Pilgrim, vice president for adoption services at the Children's Home Society & Family Services, says families looking to adopt shouldn't lose hope, because millions of children worldwide need homes. "If you hang in there, you will be able to adopt," he says. "It may take longer, so give yourself more time."

'It was absolutely crushing'

Some families, fed up with waits and visa denials, are hiring attorneys. The Markoffs have turned to Lynda Zengerle, a partner at Steptoe & Johnson, a prominent law firm in Washington, D.C. She has helped several families get U.S. visas for Vietnamese children.

On June 16, the day the painters came to paint Phan's bedroom "misty lilac," the Markoffs got a letter from the U.S. government saying it intended to deny the adoption. It questioned whether Phan's father knew he was giving her up permanently.

"It was absolutely crushing," says Jodi Markoff, her voice cracking.

Zengerle arranged for a Vietnamese investigator to re-interview Phan's father. She says the interview makes clear the father understands his daughter could be adopted abroad. Zengerle says he left her at the orphanage in October after Phan's mother died and has not returned to visit.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, which works with the State Department investigating prospective adoptions, cannot comment on a specific case because of privacy concerns, spokesman Bill Wright says.

"We're not insensitive to children and don't want to condemn them to orphanages," says the State Department's Bond.

At the same time, she says her office also doesn't want kids bought or stolen from their parents.

The Markoffs never expected their adoption to be denied, partly because Phan is older than most adoption candidates. The Markoffs have ordered furniture, bought clothes and checked out summer camps and kindergartens for Phan.

"She's part of our family," says Scott Markoff. He says their sons were nervous at first about Phan's adoption, then got excited — and now are confused.

He says Tyler, 10, told them: "I don't understand why it has to be so complicated. All we want to do is give someone a home."

Share this story:

2009 Adoption Policy Conference

2009 Adoption Policy Conference

International Adoption, the United States and the Reality of the Hague System

presented by The Center for Adoption Policy,
The Child Advocacy Program of Harvard Law School, and
The Justice Action Center at New York Law School

Friday, March 6, 2009
New York Law School
Wellington Conference Center

This conference will address all aspects of international adoption to and from the United States, one year after the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption became effective in the United States.

SCHEDULE OF EVENTS

9:30 a.m. - 9:40 a.m.
Welcome
Diane B. Kunz, Executive Director, Center for Adoption Policy
Elizabeth Bartholet, Professor, Harvard Law School;  Director, Child Advocacy Program, Harvard Law School

Subject: International Adoption Under Attack

From: ACT for Adoption <act@adoptionpolicy.org>
Date: October 27, 2010 1:38:02 PM EDT
Subject: International Adoption Under Attack

Having trouble viewing this email? Click here

ACT for Adoption logo

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  International Adoption Under Attack
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

International Adoption continues to be under attack, with disastrous results for children.  The numbers of such adoptions are dramatically down in recent years, dropping by more than half since the peak in 2004.The following chart illustrates:

 

ICA chart

  

In addition children lucky enough to be adopted are being held in institutions for longer periods prior to adoption, putting them at higher risk for lifelong damage.

 

We urge all ACT for Adoption members to consider taking action as indicated below:

 

(1) Sign the online Petition circulated by the new Both Ends Burning Campaign. This is a grassroots, multimedia campaign to promote reformed methods of regulating international adoption that would enable it to better serve the needs of unparented children. It is producing a film, Wrongfully Detained, which will demonstrate the depth of the damage done by the current international adoption crisis. It has also launched a petition campaign on its web site, with the goal of taking a million-and-one signatures to the UN to demand change. They need your help! To check out this organization, view their Petition, and sign on, go to their web site Both Ends Burning .If you agree with the goals of this Campaign, you can both sign the petition and urge others to do the same by forwarding this email.

 

(2) The United States recently announced that the U.S. will not participate in the new Guatemalan Adoption Pilot Program. Previously the U.S. had participated, along with UNICEF and others, in closing down Guatemala's adoption program, so that new adoptions from Guatemala stopped on Dec. 31, 2007.  Thousands of adoptions in process at the time have been delayed over the last 3 years, and still hundreds are being obstructed. Little has been done to provide decent alternative care for those children who are not being adopted.  Nothing that either the Department of State or USCIS has done so far has been effective in moving this logjam. Governments like the U.S., which insisted that Guatemala endorse the Hague Treaty, have an obligation to do the maximum possible to help develop acceptable and child centric international adoption systems.  You can help by  emailing your concern, and your demand for action to help children in need of adoptive homes, to:

 

- Department of State : ASKCI@state.gov

 - UNICEF Director Tony Lake:  alake@unicef.org

 

For questions about the Guatemala situation, contact: 

Hannah Wallace, Focus on Adoption, which has been active in trying to keep international adoption open in Guatemala: hwall334@aol.com

Please also forward this email to anyone who you think will be interested - Subscription link.

 You are receiving this mailing because of your existing relationship with the Center for Adoption Policy or the Child Advocacy Program at Harvard Law School. To unsubscribe at anytime, please click on the link at the bottom of the e-mail.

Links...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
 
 
Safe Unsubscribe
ACT for Adoption | 168A Kirby Lane | Rye | NY | 10580

Senators Blunt, Klobuchar & Representatives Granger, Lawrence Introduce Vulnerable Children and Families Act

May 19 2017

Senators Blunt, Klobuchar & Representatives Granger, Lawrence Introduce Vulnerable Children and Families Act

Bill Will Help More Children Find Homes Through International Adoption & Child Welfare Efforts

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senators Roy Blunt (Mo.) and Amy Klobuchar (Minn.), along with U.S. Representatives Kay Granger (Texas) and Brenda Lawrence (Mich.), yesterday introduced the Vulnerable Children and Families Act. The measure would help more children living without families or in institutional care find permanent homes by enhancing U.S. diplomatic efforts around international child welfare and ensuring that intercountry adoption to the United States becomes a more viable and fully-developed option.

“Every child deserves a permanent, safe, loving home no matter where they are born,” Blunt said. “Unfortunately, there are millions of children across the world who are growing up without the security and stability that comes with family-based care. This bill will help connect more children in need of permanent homes with families in the United States and around the world that are eager to adopt.”

SAVE the CHILDREN from SAVE the CHILDREN

Forwarded Message ----
From: ACT for Adoption <act@adoptionpolicy.org>
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2009 7:30:40 PM
Subject: Save the Children from Save the Children
Having trouble viewing this email? Click here
A

CT for Adoption
SAVE the CHILDREN from SAVE the CHILDREN
April 2009
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This week a Malawi court will make a life-changing decision about Mercy James. Will Mercy be allowed to grow up in a permanent family with Madonna as her adoptive mother?
 
 
Spokesman for Save the Children, UK, Dominic Nutt, says that Mercy and other children in her position should remain in a Malawi orphanage. For no better reason than that these children may have living relatives, he believes that they should always remain in their original communities. Unfortunately, Nutt ignores the fact that these children's presence in an orphanage is the surest indication that their relatives are deceased or, if alive, unable to care for them.
 
The usual justification for Save the Children's approach is that children who remain in their country of origin can enjoy their racial, ethnic and national heritage. But children doomed to grow up in orphanages or on the streets cannot expect to enjoy their cultural heritage in any meaningful way. And the real choice today for most existing homeless children in most of the countries of the world is between life - and often death - in orphanages or on the streets in their home country and, for a lucky few, life in an adoptive home abroad. Research on children who started their early life in orphanages demonstrates vividly the damage such institutions do.
 
International Adoption has come under fire recently from UNICEF and others who share Save the Children's views. But International Adoption provides children the possibility of finding the permanent nurturing homes they need to thrive, homes that are typically simply not available in their countries of origin. And International Adoption is completely consistent with other positive social responses to the problems of unparented children, bringing new resources into poor countries to support such efforts, and developing new awareness of and concern for the plight of poor children and poor communities worldwide.
 
 
We are not in possession of all the facts relevant to appropriate resolution of Mercy's particular case. But we urge policy-makers, including judges making decisions in such cases, to review and consider the International Adoption Policy Statement and Supporting Report, endorsed by the American Academy of Adoption Attorneys, the Center for Adoption Policy, the Harvard Law School Child Advocacy Program, and the National Council For Adoption - click here.
 

 
Links...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Center for Adoption Policy
Child Advocacy Program at Harvard Law School

Bartholet speaks out on international adoption

April 03, 2009
Harvard Law School Professor Elizabeth Bartholet ’65 has issued a public letter in support of international adoption as news that a court in Malawi denied a petition for adoption by the entertainer Madonna. Bartholet was joined in the statement by a  group of experts in child welfare. The text of the letter is below.
Save the Children from Save the Children
An appeals court in Malawi will now make a life-changing decision about Mercy James. Will Mercy be allowed to grow up in a permanent family with Madonna as her adoptive mother?
Spokesman for Save the Children, UK, Dominic Nutt, says that Mercy and other children in her position should remain in a Malawi orphanage. For no better reason than that these children may have living relatives, he believes that they should always remain in their original communities. Unfortunately, Nutt ignores the fact that these children's presence in an orphanage is the surest indication that their relatives are deceased or, if alive, unable to care for them.
The usual justification for Save the Children's approach is that children who remain in their country of origin can enjoy their racial, ethnic and national heritage. But children doomed to grow up in orphanages or on the streets cannot expect to enjoy their cultural heritage in any meaningful way. And the real choice today for most existing homeless children in most of the countries of the world is between life - and often death - in orphanages or on the streets in their home country and, for a lucky few, life in an adoptive home abroad. Research on children who started their early life in orphanages demonstrates vividly the damage such institutions do.
International Adoption has come under fire recently from UNICEF and others who share Save the Children's views. But International Adoption provides children the possibility of finding the permanent nurturing homes they need to thrive, homes that are typically simply not available in their countries of origin. And International Adoption is completely consistent with other positive social responses to the problems of unparented children, bringing new resources into poor countries to support such efforts, and developing new awareness of and concern for the plight of poor children and poor communities worldwide.
We are not in possession of all the facts relevant to appropriate resolution of Mercy's particular case. But we urge policy-makers, including judges making decisions in such cases, to review and consider the International Adoption Policy Statement and Supporting Report, endorsed by the American Academy of Adoption Attorneys, the Center for Adoption Policy, the Harvard Law School Child Advocacy Program, and the National Council For Adoption -click here.

 

Bartholet speaks out on international adoption
 

Forum: Subject: ACT for Adoption

Message: 67772From: slm2306Received: Mo Jan 12, 2009 11:20
Subject: ACT for Adoption

I received the following email today and wanted to share the information with those interested in joining ACT for Adoption.

Harvard Law Professor Elizabeth Bartholet is Director of the Child Advocacy Program at Harvard Law School (one of the sponsors of ACT for Adoption) and is a nationally renown child welfare and adoption advocate. Some of you may remember that she wrote an editorial in favor of international adoption in the Washington Post (Nov. 4, 2007)"Slamming the Door on Adoption - Depriving Children Abroad of Loving Homes."


ACT for Adoption
Introduction
December 2008
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We have an opportunity to restore adoption to its rightful priority as a legitimate, welcome solution to the needs of children living outside of family care.

ACT for ADOPTION is a coalition of supporters of adoption who can be mobilized to communicate with the White House, Members of Congress,government agencies and the press to educate and advocate for legislation, policies and administrative procedures supportive of adoption. Children without parents have no seat at the policy table,and no voice to refute sensationalistic articles that would deny a loving family to a child rather than face the hard work of effective regulation. We must be prepared to speak for them.

President-elect Barack Obama made his support for adoption clear during his campaign. Hillary Clinton, his nominee for Secretary of State, has been a member of the Congressional Coalition for Adoption (CCA). CCA is a bicameral, bipartisan caucus dedicated to improving adoption policy and practice, and to focusing public attention on the advantages of adoption. Confirmation hearings and legislative initiatives will begin early in 2009, and we have the chance to roll back the anti-adoption bias that has crept into both domestic and international child welfare agendas.

ACT for ADOPTION is sponsored by the Center for Adoption Policy, and the Child Advocacy Program at Harvard Law School. You are receiving this mailing because of your existing relationship with the Center for Adoption Policy or the Child Advocacy Program at Harvard Law School. To unsubscribe at anytime, please click on the link below.

Please also forward this email to anyone who you think will be interested - Subscription link. ACT for Adoption : Mailing List Signup
Links...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Center for Adoption Policy Center for Adoption Policy
Child Advocacy Program at Harvard Law School
HLS : Child Advocacy Program

A Crisis

September 4, 2008. I-600/A and I-800/A Crisis. The Intercountry Adoption Act of 2000 clearly mandated that potential adoptive parents who had previously filed an I-600A in connection with an adoption from a Hague country prior to April 1, 2008 would be allowed to continue to follow the I-600/A procedures and use the I-600/A forms. The 2007 State Department Frequently Asked Questions document reiterated this commitment. However, Citizenship and Immigration Services and the State Department have now changed their minds. Officials have instead declared that PAPs may have one free renewal of the I-600A and then must switch to an I-800/A process. Such a postion is contrary to the letter and spirit of the IAA. Moreover, it puts in jeopardy thousands of in-process adoptions, particularly from China. We are doing everything we can to reverse this decision. Grandfathered must mean grandfathered.