Home  

“Minister of Health, Daniela Bartos investigated for international adoptions”

Evenimentul Zilei, 28 June 2001

Evenementul Zilei

“Minister of Health, Daniela Bartos investigated for international adoptions”

According to the article “Evenimentul Zilei” newspaper is in the possession of documents stating that the former and present minister for health, Mrs. Daniela Bartos, has been enquired in 1997 in relation with the international adoptions.

According to the government organigrame, in 1996 the State Secretary within the Ministry of Health was the head of the Romanian Committee for Adoption. Between January and August 1996, the State Secretary Daniela Bartos was the head of CRA and then starting with August 1996 until December 1996 she was promoted as Minister within the same ministry. The penal dossier, in which Mrs. Bartos was investigated in 1997, was related to irregularities in CRA documents during 1996.

Directori de la Adoptii si maternitati implicati in vanzarea copiilor

Cotidianul, 2001
 
Directori de la Adoptii si maternitati implicati in vanzarea copiilor
Tehnica traficantilor spune totul despre intentiile lor „umanitare“: Guvernul Romaniei are grija de copiii institutionalizati prin Comitetul Roman pentru Adoptii (CRA). Conform unor prevederi din Regulamentul CRA, o fundatie pentru protectia copilului nu poate intermedia o adoptie, decat daca ea este acreditata de catre aceasta. Pentru a obtine fara probleme un copil, mafiotii ii aranjau un certificat medical care scotea copilul bolnav, pentru ca mai apoi sa il ceara de la CRA, ca „repartizat nominal“. Aceasta metoda a iscat in ianuarie 1999 un scandal in care au fost antrenate doua fundatii, „Irene“ si „Stuart“ fundatii patronate de avocata Elena Bustea. Ea a obtinut mai multi copii spre adoptie, pe baza unor astfel de certificate, insa ancheta demarata in cazul celor doua fundatii nu a demonstrat ca s-ar fi facut ilegalitati. Doar unii ofiteri care au cercetat cazul au facut marturisiri presei, cum ca cele doua organizatii ale lui Bustea ar fi implicate in adoptii ilegale, insa, ar beneficia de protectia unor importanti oameni politici si ofiteri superiori din cadrul Ministerului de Interne.
In august 1996, Elisabeta Amzar, in varsta de 60 de ani, sefa Sectiei Nou-Nascuti a spitalului „Caritas“ din Bucuresti, impreuna cu subalternele sale, Laura Gheorghe si Ecaterina Balaceanu, au fost acuzate de mijlocirea unei adoptii ilegale. Florin Burcea, un copil care s-a nascut pe data de 21 august 1996 la spitalul „Caritas“, a fost abandonat in spital de catre mama sa, Daniela Burcea deoarece nu beneficia de fonduri materiale pentru a-l intretine. Dupa ce copilul a fost abandonat, Elisabeta Amzar si Laura Gheorghe au eliberat un certificat constatator fals, dar cu acelasi numar de inregistrare cu al celui original, pe care l-au trimis la Autoritatea Tutelara. In falsul intocmit de cele doua nu au fost specificate datele personale ale mamei naturale, iar semnatura medicului de garda, peste care a fost aplicata si parafa, a fost si ea falsificata. Asistenta Ecaterina Balaceanu a incheiat foaia de observatie clinica a nou-nascutului, trecand eronat domiciliul mamei si „uitand“ mentionarea datelor din buletinul de identitate al acesteia. Pe baza acestor acte, Florin Burcea a fost infiat de o familie de italieni care locuieste in Elvetia, fara acordul mamei naturale.
Cele trei au intrat atunci in atentia Biroului Politiei Criminale din cadrul Sectiei 10, fiind cercetate in stare de libertate.
Un alt caz care a facut valva este cel al lui Sorin Astratini, care acum doi ani era director la Directia pentru Adoptii din Primaria Sectorului 3. Fostul director a fost prins in flagrant in seara de 14 ianuarie 1999, cand, intr-un restaurant McDonald’s din Bucuresti a primit suma de 3500 de dolari de la reprezentanta unei fundatii care intermedia adoptii, pentru a aviza favorabil infierea a trei copii de catre cetateni straini. Astratini a fost denuntat tocmai de clienta sa, care a pus la dispozitia politiei doua casete audio, pe care erau inregistrate intalnirile anterioare cu Astratini. Din ascultarea benzilor s-a constatat ca, timp de doi ani, fostul director a pretins si primit peste 7000 de dolari, bani pe care urma sa-i imparta cu alti doi inalti functionari din Primaria Sectorului 3 Bucuresti, implicati in afacere.
 

BBC - Blue Peter Scandal and Shopping for Babies

iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/i84OnO4wkJ4" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen>

Dozens of Spanish couples 'bought' children in illegal adoption in Romania

GOOGLE TRANSLATION:

Dozens of Spaniards had 'bought' children in a network of illegal adoption in Romania
The organization operates three months ago and receives about three million by Adopted
JAVIER Sampedro - Madrid - 01/11/1996

 
10 votes Vote Result
A telephone number circulating in Bucharest mouth to ear among Spanish couples wishing to adopt a child. If stakeholders demonstrate their creditworthiness, a couple of trips to the Romanian capital are sufficient to return home in three months with a child in the arms, including Romanian passport. The adoptive parents can choose from a wide range whose prices, according to age and aesthetic preferences, ranging from two to four million pesetas. The Spanish ambassador in Bucharest said: "There are adoptions, this is clearly an illegal trafficking of children."

The case has been reported to this newspaper by J. G. P. and F. R. S., 37 and 36 years, one of the couples from Madrid who started preparations but decided not used after his apparent understanding of illegality. The complainants claim that at least 50 couples have already acquired Spanish Romanian children in this way, and that dozens more are in full trámite. The ambassador in Bucharest, Antonio Ortiz, confirmed yesterday the existence of child trafficking and stressed its illegality, and Spain and Romania have signed the Hague Convention for the Protection of Children, which sets strict criteria for international adoptions. "But unfortunately, children are being sold in Bucharest" Ortiz says, "is enormously worrying."

A few months ago, J,. G. P. and F. R. S. decided to adopt a child outside of Spain, a growing practice due to demographic imbalances, and were prepared to deal with the paperwork, which typically last several years. But another couple in a similar situation persuaded them to follow a shortcut: "In Romania can be achieved in three or four months," they claimed. "We give you the phone."

As he was told, J. G. P. marked the number of Bucharest and asked for a lawyer named Eliana. The Romanian, who spoke Spanish, asked him first of all who had given him the phone. J. G. P. he said. Once verified that that name was on their list of past clients, Eliana proceeded to the next step in the protocol: "You must send its payroll, a certificate of assets and writing of their properties." So did the hombre.Unas weeks later, they called for them to travel to Bucharest. The Romanian them housed in a small urban apartment, to 16,000 pesetas each night, in which there were at least three other couples in Spain. Gave them a form to fill out: boy or girl, what age and other preferences. During the three-day stay, a guide who spoke Castilian taught the city in charge of the organization.

"The next day," says J. G. P., "led us to a kind of orphanage. We agree there with two other couples. As we had asked for girls, four girls taught us to choose from, some blonde, some brunette, some months, another one and a half years." According to the election, those responsible are identified prices, which ranged between two and four million pesetas.

At that time the adoptive returning to Spain while the organization manages the roles of the child, according to J. G. P. always in the same court in Bucharest. A couple of weeks later, the couple returns to the Romanian capital with the money, necessarily in cash and in dólares.Pasaporte rule


Once the payment, the organization delivers the child to the couple, along with a certificate of adoption issued by the said court, a birth certificate and a Romanian passport in order. Those responsible to advise couples who do not go in no time at the Spanish Embassy in Bucharest.

"In recent years," says a document from the Directorate General for Children and the Family, "have increased adoption practices contrary to the fundamental rights of children: pressures on parents for abandoning her children, sale of children, Missing Children ... It was subsequently adopted child trafficking. "Avoiding these practices is the aim of the Hague Convention for the Protection of Children recently signed by 63 countries, including Spain and Romania. The agreement governs a demanding process for international adoptions, which should always start by counseling for Social Affairs of each Autonomous Community. After their adventure Romanian, J. G. P. and F. R. S. ended up choosing this path, slowly but legal.

 

 

Decenas de españoles han 'comprado' niños en una red de adopción ilegal en Rumania

“Kroongetuige in zaak van adoptiefraude wordt met de dood bedreigd”

"Crown witness in adoption fraud case is threatened with death"

Today at 03:00byDirk Coosemans

Crown witness Dieumerci K. was in a Congolese cell for a long time, but the investigation would have shown that he and his entire family were misled. PHOTO: AFP

The witness in the case of the adoption fraud involving Congolese children would have been threatened with death, according to a complaint to the Brussels police. Dieumerci K. currently resides in Congo and has already received people from the entourage of the suspects there several times. The federal prosecutor's office will investigate the complaint.

The adoption fraud case came to light four years ago. The court found that the Belgian-Congolese Julienne M., and her seven officials from the French-speaking Community in our country, would have taken at least five children from parents in Congo to be put up for adoption in Belgium. The court wants to prosecute the eight suspects for human trafficking.

Meeting Katja with Paquet - and Axel (husband Katja) - comment Social Media

HR was there with him although he didn't seemingly know her either and she was not introduced although we all needed to wait in the Secretariat for 5 minutes or so.

JEP handled the situation well although Axel says that Il avait l'air embêté. He summarized my situation from his point of view and asked then me to complete. I mentioned also you. He said indeed the situation was not satisfactory neither for the DG nor for me especially since he had heard I was someone with an excellent reputation. He said he had counted on my transfer to DG EMPL and therefore had not reacted earlier. According to him my medical part-time plays against my transfer to another DG and therefore the solution needs to come from inside (his Directorate). (Do not know why only his Directorate.) He also said medical part-time does not allow checks by the Medical service (this is not true); I said I didn't have any checks during the first two months of sick leave either.

He said in his Directorate what was left apart from geo units were D5 and D6. The latter (your unit) he didn't even suggest. D5, Morten's unit on Regional programmes, could be an option, especially civil society. I said in that case I would prefer the regional cooperation part, because I would detect too many problems for example with the contract with UNICEF they are about to sign. I flagged my preferred option, Marta. Not sure he entirely liked that, it came as a sort of surprise. He even asked how I had thought about that and expressed somewhat a concern that this would also be linked to DI. He was a priori fine with that but said would need to check with Danielsson.

He said they would decide next week and my transfer would be effective from 1 June.

I also referred to the issue. He said he had read the note on Lessons learnt from RO. I gave it to him, too, along with my CV and CDR. On the other hand he interestingly said that he saw some opening for ICA, although he remembered very well Verheugen's decision to put on hold accession negotiations until these issues were solved. He also had this myth of orphans. (I think in your note one sub-title should be about the myth of orphans, because people don't understand.) At the same time he was less amused (he said he was not aware) when I said we were financing IPA projects in ME which contributed to children leaving the country through ICA. In the end he asked me about UNCRC and why JUST thinks the situation has evolved.

AD/ACT reply on behalf of Reynders: citizensletter - UNCRC not acquis

---------- Forwarded message ---------

From: JUST-C2-CHARTE@ec.europa.eu

Date: Fri 25. Nov 2022 at 22:19

Subject: Reply to Citizen's Letter - Ares(2022)8175473

To: info@againstchildtrafficking.org

"Belgium has long been aware of suspicious adoptions from Congo"

"Belgium has long been aware of suspicious adoptions from Congo"

(Google Translation)

Edited by: FT

5/16/17 - 18u06 Source: Belga

Our reporter and photographer Kurt Wertelaers Benoit Freine went to Congo in late April and spoke among others with Suriya and Usman, the biological parents of Zakiatyu in our country in an adoptive family lives. © Benoit Freine.

Reynders bespreekt adopties met Oegandese president

Reynders bespreekt adopties met Oegandese president

BEWAAR ARTIKEL

Tweet REACTIES 0

Door: redactie

23/09/16 - 06u47 Bron: Belga

"Reynders weakened the rule of law"

Alexis Deswaef is the lawyer for Nicolas Ullens de Schooten, a former State Security agent. The latter accused Minister Didier Reynders, the new European commissioner, and Jean-Claude Fontinoy, his right-hand man, of corruption. He claims that he was muzzled from 2015. The lawyer explains why, in his eyes, the Ullens "case" is a state scandal.

Lawyer Alexis Deswaef surprised some of his colleagues, including in his very "human rights" Brussels firm, when he agreed to defend the man who accuses Didier Reynders and Jean-Claude Fontinoy: Nicolas Ullens de Schooten , a former State Security agent. Deswaef, “the lawyer for undocumented migrants”, has just been elected vice-president of the FIDH (International Federation of Human Rights Leagues), after having presided over the Belgian league. Why is he embarking on such an adventure? How to prove such allegations?

Quick reminder of the sequence: in April 2019, Nicolas Ullens balance what he has to the police. Indications, names – that of Reynders and Fontinoy – which recur in the files he follows from his position as an agent of the intelligence services. He then evokes the Kazakhgate, the affair of the “Libyan funds”, the move of the federal police to a building sold by the State to a private firm or even the construction of the Belgian embassy in Kinshasa. Faced with the police, agent Ullens claims to have been sidelined in August 2015, right when a member of the Reynders cabinet was appointed No. 3 of the Sûreté. Serious charges.

Reynders is a political heavyweight. The Belgian government chose him to represent our country at the European Commission. Is it for (all) that that the Brussels public prosecutor closes the file without duty of investigation, last September?

A "machination"