Home  

ICAV Speech to the UN on 20 September 2023

Hi everyone my name is Lynelle Long and I’m a Vietnamese adoptee raised in Australia. I’m also the founder of InterCountry Adoptee Voices (ICAV) and I’m presenting to you from Sydney. Firstly, I wish to thank the UN Committees and Special Rapporteurs for inviting ICAV here today and for their hard work and commitment to supporting us. Special thanks to the Committee on Enforced Disappearances for making this possible and coordinating us all! I am honoured to be here with my fellow colleagues! Having published the UN Joint Statement a year ago, it was and remains a beacon of light after so many years of our voices crying out in what often felt like the darkness. Perhaps because of our great resilience and courage from being sent abroad completely alone as adoptees into a foreign country as infants and young children, we have developed the tenacity and will power to be able to stand here today to fight for our rights and call out the wrongs done to so many of us. Our global community is large and ICAV is here to represent a portion of that. I would love for all of them to present to you themselves, but for the purposes of today’s meeting and due to the time constraints, ICAV has compiled a collaborative paper that gives you their input and perspectives, other than from only the speakers today. I know from providing peer support to this community for 25 years, that our experiences vary and it’s important to understand the nuances when trying to achieve real and impactful change. We come to you presenting our ICAV paper, representing 9 adoptive countries and 19 birth countries. Our paper has been provided as a link to the CED Secretariat but is also hosted at ICAVs website https://intercountryadopteevoices.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Victims-of-IllegalIntercountry-Adoption-Speak-Out-to-the-UN.pdf I’m going to speak about what we see as the top 4 priorities as shown in our global collaborative, and I provide my suggestion as to WHO should be involved and responsible to address each priority: Priority 1 We need legislative frameworks to define illegal intercountry adoptions and allow the prosecution of those who do wrong. We need to criminalise the behaviours and we need to remove barriers such as the statutes of limitations and ensure compensation to victims aligned to the lifelong impacts. Who responsible: Legislative frameworks need to be tackled by politicians and lawyers around the world and ultimately it is the public - the people - who push legislators and governments to do the will of the people. The UN could also further assist by developing an in-depth legal definition for what an illegal and illicit intercountry adoption is, providing examples. The UN is already addressing the huge need to educate people by holding this forum today. Papers like ICAVs and the many other adoptee led papers and resources that contribute significantly to this topic are important. We all do what we can to educate the world. Priority 2 Truth investigations that lead to public acknowledgement, an accounting for what has gone wrong, and having full, un-redacted access to our history and origins artefacts. Who responsible: States / governments around the world need to fund an independent body to conduct Truth Investigations so that the evidence is brought to light and then the States need to www.intercountryadopteevoices.com Page 1 of 2 give public acknowledgements and funding to remedy the wrongs of the past. Priority 3 The need for legislated and free post adoption supports that include illegal and illicit intercountry adoption specialist supports, esp DNA testing, genealogy, and search/reunification services. Not all countries currently offer post adoption supports. This needs to change. Who responsible: legislators to bring about the legislation part, but then States need to fund and ensure provision of trauma informed and professional services. Priority 4 Stop and end all intercountry adoptions as they are conducted today (Hague and non Hague) and until priority 1, 2 and 3 are addressed. We should not be continuing what has become the commodification and trade of children. Who responsible: States / governments, The Hague, need to step up and end this ongoing trade of children, take responsibility for their own and turn to local solutions in-country. Intercountry adoption in this manner and via the current processes since the past 70 years are not in the best interests of the child. To end, I want to bring attention to the voices of biological families who you have started to hear from today. I am thankful and honoured to have worked with the CED to enable this as our first event where adoptees and biological families can present our experiences and views, side by side. Illegal and illicit intercountry adoptions have lifelong and multi generational impacts and as adoptees being raised in mostly white western countries we have so much privilege, so much access to basic resources like internet and DNA technology. I am strongly of the view, and I lead from example, that we must do more to help bring our biological families with us so their voices can also be heard. Thank you and I look forward to listening to the rest of our presenters and working with the UN Committees into the future.

Sweden stops adoptions from Madagascar and Panama

The adoption center is Sweden's largest mediator of international adoptions. Now the association has been denied continued adoption mediation from Madagascar and Panama. 

 

Adoption centers are no longer allowed to mediate adoptions from Madagascar and Panama.


 


 

UAI: Parliament is facing a historical error

delvaux@senators.senate.be, schelfhout@senators.senate.be , info@kindengezin.be , Vera.Jans@vlaamsparlement.be


 
Belgium Parliament is facing a historical error
As everybody should know by now, secrecy, hidden facts and sealed records is against the interests of adoptees and most of the cases against the long term interests of mothers also. But without examining and doing research about the effects of secrecy regarding adoption, the Belgium Parliament is heading towards a situation of going back to earlier times to make an historical error.
Without understanding why, the Belgium Parliament is willing to accept a new bill to put a new regime on delivering babies for the adoption industry in secrecy. As all know, involved in the adoption world, sealed records and secrecy regarding relinquishment does not deal with the fact of the long term consequence of adoptees wanting to find their parents.
Historical research shows even, that in many cases, the woman whom relinquished the children for adoption wants to children to know where and who they are. This fact seems not to be taken into account. Again it seems that the adoption community of adopters see their interests protected but for which price ?
 
We cannot remember that so called birth mothers relinquished their babies to give these children as a secret gift to others nor to these children to be delivered in secrecy.
 
Why the Belgium government still wants to pull off this new bill is for many people, at least for (domestic) adoptees and many (former) birth mothers a question. But with all the adoption scandals where Belgium lately is involved, this question is not longer a strange one but answers again, that the interest of (prospective) adoption parents is more important as the ones where we should listen to. Adoptees and their (birth)parents.
 
As a member of the International Hague Convention regarding adoption, Belgium is not alone neglecting the guidelines of this convention but also pleads with a decision to enforce the new bill, not to respect article 21 b and c of the Child Rights Convention. It is strange that the international community, at least the European Union, is not criticising Belgium Policy regarding adoption. Probably awaiting the implementation so they can do the same.
 
At the end, one has to understand that the demand for children is unequally high and the supply of these wanted children every year less and less. To fulfill the wishes of the electorate, politics have to be involved to please and to protect the interest of the (prospective) adoption parents. Many of them are members of parliament themselves. It is not e very difficult answer to find why secrecy and sealed records should be introduced again. The question still remains, in whose interest this decision will be made.
 
United Adoptees International

Rechter buigt zich over mislukte adoptie - Congo

Rechter buigt zich over mislukte adoptie

OUDENAARDE/ GERAARDSBERGEN - Het parket van Oudenaarde heeft een 48-jarige man van Congolese afkomst voor de correctionele rechtbank gedaagd omdat hij zonder de nodige erkenning zou bemiddeld hebben bij een adoptie. De man, die in Geraardsbergen woont, ontkent de beschuldiging met klem. Een gezin uit Geraardsbergen, dat zich na het mislukken van de adoptie burgerlijke partij stelde, eist een schadevergoeding van 16.500 euro.

Nadat een adoptiepoging via Kind & Gezin geen soelaas bracht, kwam een koppel uit Geraardsbergen op café toevallig in contact met de beklaagde. ,,Hij stelde zich voor als voorzitter van een adoptievereniging in

Congo

en hij verzekerde mijn cliënten dat hij hen kon helpen'', lichtte de verdediging toe.

Belgische Senaat - Handelingen

2-165

2-165

Belgische Senaat

Handelingen

WOENSDAG 19 DECEMBER 2001 - OCHTENDVERGADERING

(Vervolg)

Mails to Central Authority - Dorine Chamon - about minutes meeting

Beste Dorine,

Hierbij herhaal ik ons verzoek. Indien wederom geen antwoord zullen wij ten zeerste overwegen juridische stappen te ondernemen.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Roelie Post

http://againstchildtrafficking.org
http://www.romania-forexportonly.eu

ACT fully depends on private funding.
We are entirely grateful for donations so that we can continue and expand
our work

Please follow us on Twitter@ACT_ACT

Der bayerische Papst, die römischen Kardinäle und die siebenbürgische Lustknabenschule des Pater Don Demidoff | (The Bavarian Pope, the Roman cardinals and the Transylvanian pleasure boys' school of Father Don Demidoff |)


The Internet is full of the most interesting finds and other flea market items, but the spoiled information collector rarely finds something as tasty as what he recently found on the 'cultural heritage group'. First of all, I'll just repeat what Armin Maurer said there based on information he received. In between and afterwards, supplement it with a few explanations and other comments. 😉

…………………………………………………………………………

“The statements of an informant from the NGO ResRo [Restitution in Romania - HH], who told me yesterday that after the revelation of these connections he had to go into hiding because his life was at risk:

'Romania has been supplying Catholic-educated boys to the Roman cardinals since 2005. After the death of the middleman [Father “Don Demidoff” – HH], whose “training center” was a renovated fortified church [Gross-Schenk/Cincu and/or Jakobsdorf/Iacobeni – HH], there were unintentional revelations by the Pope’s valet.

The infiltration was led by the Romanian secret service, which successfully blackmailed the Vatican in order not to have to return the properties in Romania confiscated from the Catholic Church during communism and in order to force the Vatican to support the ECHR pilot ruling, which provides for that the state is allowed to expropriate anything for the benefit of the general public and must compensate the owners - also for the benefit of the general public - very little or not at all.