Home  

Primul preşedinte al Fundaţiei Soros scuipă unde a lins. Alin Teodorescu şi “drogaţii” evrei, americani, unguri şi PSD-işti

Primul preşedinte al Fundaţiei Soros scuipă unde a lins. Alin Teodorescu şi “drogaţii” evrei, americani, unguri şi PSD-işti

Fb-Button

 

 

International Social Services, from India to Romania (Part 3)

By Roelie Post (guest blogger)

When in 2011/2012 the filming of Stolen Children – Intercountry Adoptions from India was ongoing in ACT’s office in Brussels, I got drawn into the details of the German/Indian trafficking case.

Arun was talking in German with the journalist, explaining to her the involvement of the German branch of International Social Services. Internationale Sozialdienst Deutscher Zweig, he called it.

Wait, where did I see that name before?

A quick look into my archives brought me to a Petition Kreuz 1999 handed in in 1999 at the European Parliament by a German citizen, a certain Gunther Kreutz.

One billion dollars from export of children

One billion dollars from export of children (Social)
         The old system of international adoption, practiced until 2004, has put more than one billion euros in the pockets of those who have left children intermediate Romanian foreign countries.

Nearly 30,000 Romanian children were adopted internationally from 1990 until the end of 2004, when he entered into force new legislation concerning the legal status of adoptions, which put a "exports" of children. The figure, reported by Theodora Bertzi, head of the Romanian Office for Adoptions (ORA), was first circulating in sociologist Alin Teodorescu, based on a study in 2003. "If from 1997 until 2002, after introducing moratorium, were acts of international adoption for 10,000 children, the figure of 30,000 does not seem exaggerated for the period 1990-2004," said Bertzi.

30,000 dollars for a child

In addition, says chief ORA NGOs were funded by Romanian families from outside in order to receive children for international adoption, money which should have been invested in programs in Romania. Besides these sums, families dadeau foreign NGOs, local partners of the amounts between 30,000 and 50,000 euros, to adopt a Romanian child, said Bertzi. A simple calculation shows that the Romanian children was paid in these years at least one billion euros.

Diana Nistorescu, executive director of the Federation of NGOs Active in Child Protection (FONPC), said that NGOs had this money from outside "is allowed to pay taxes from the Child Protection which had priority in obtaining permits, are favored .

She added that "the old system was corrupt, from the highest level until the last maternity leave, but nobody was punished." Bogdan Panait, president of the Authority for Child Protection (ANPDC) says that "most of the amounts taken to remain in Romanian children abroad, including where they were used in election campaigns of politicians who claimed international adoptions.

Take the signature

Secretary of State ORA explain the large number of children who went to a foreign family in very simple ways of making adoptions, but also by the existence of trafficking networks. "Before 1997, adoption is made in the village hall. Venea mother who sign that they put the baby up for adoption, then sign and making adoptatoare family in receipt. The transaction is easy, and had a child stuff," according Theodora Bertzi. The trafficking of children, both reported by the European Community, as well as representatives of NGOs, and those who deal with child protection, are now in a process of "sleepy", pending unlocking international adoptions, added the representative TIME.

Nepotism between NGOs and state

Before the moratorium established in 2001, which provisional closing valve adoptiior international law Roman "made clear the connection between children and money, which led to the corruption," said Bertzi. She claims that were several methods used for trafficking in children, a clear violation of international law and signed by Romania.

One of these was the creation of an internal network based on nepotism, between representatives of state institutions who were in care of children and NGOs allowed to do international adoptions. "I know chiefs who were at the Office of Adoptions, whose daughter was a lawyer and worked at a firm adoption. So here is how to circulate information. Or a head swing, or was swinging, whose daughter had a foundation in connection with another foundation outside, all the lawyer girl. She clearly knew where the children are families who came and I brought there. When you have families who wanted a child, this was done immediately adopted. These were not in law incompatibilities, but they exist. For that could never be punished, "tells Bertzi.

Mothers, and fooled by the state attorneys

Another method of obtaining a child has been systematic pacalirea mothers, especially after 1997. On the one hand, lawyers NGOs interested persuade mothers, usually poor, as the child is better to be raised several years of rich families from abroad. Finally, the mother signed a notarized document that was agreed to give her children from their families abroad, but without knowing the final despartirea was said Bertzi.

In parallel, the social workers tried to separate the child from the mother and the staff placed the cradle where the baby was not recorded in the register of visiting relatives or mother. So that, by law, if a child appeared in obvious that was not visited his family for more than six months, it became adopted. Before 1997, the network traffic was in the maternity and pediatric sections. "Who had the information? Medical personnel working there. Certainly there is a remuneration for the job. It's hard to prove, that any party would not have any interest to say that he / it or took money," says chief TIME.

Theodora Bertzi May shows that he began receiving complaints from mothers coming in the past, which now require to give kids back, but authorities can not do anything for them.

Valve was closed to traffic

Romanian authorities say that now, in Romania, there is the framework that allows such kind of trafficking in children. "There may be traffic now. There is a clear procedure is that the new law that binds the hands," said Theodora Bertzi. Opinion shared by Secretary of State Bogdan Panait: "The law had cut much of the impetus. We did not have signs that it would have such things happen, plus the corrupt foundations do not have authorization or have no activity object now. Diana Nistorescu from FONPC says: "It is very hard to believe that they steal children from maternity or that there is network traffic. Such information leak usually is about large sums of money."
==============================

Un miliard de dolari din exportul de copii (Social)
        Vechiul sistem de adoptie internationala, practicat pina in 2004, a bagat peste un miliard de euro in buzunarele celor care au intermediat plecarea copiilor romani in tari straine.

Aproape 30.000 de copii romani au fost adoptati international din 1990 pina la sfirsitul lui 2004, cind a intrat in vigoare noua legislatie privind regimul juridic al adoptiilor, care a pus punct "exporturilor" de copii. Cifra, semnalata de Theodora Bertzi, seful Oficiului Roman pentru Adoptii (ORA), a fost pentru prima data vehiculata de sociologul Alin Teodorescu, pe baza unui studiu din 2003. "Daca din 1997 pina in 2002, dupa instaurarea moratoriului, au fost facute acte de adoptie internationala pentru 10.000 de copii, cifra de 30.000 nu pare exagerata pentru perioada 1990-2004", a declarat Bertzi.

30.000 de dolari pentru un copil

In plus, spune seful ORA, ONG-urile romanesti erau finantate de familiile din afara ca sa poata primi copii spre adoptie internationala, bani care ar fi trebuit investiti in programe in Romania. Pe linga aceste sume, familiile dadeau ONG-urilor straine, partenere ale celor autohtone, sume cuprinse intre 30.000 si 50.000 de euro, pentru a adopta un copil roman, afirma Bertzi. Un simplu calcul arata ca pentru copiii romani s-a platit in acesti ani minimum un miliard de euro.

Diana Nistorescu, director executiv al Federatiei ONG-urilor Active in Protectia Copilului (FONPC), spune ca ONG-urile care aveau acesti bani din afara "isi permiteau sa plateasca taxe celor de la Protectia Copilului prin care aveau prioritate la obtinerea autorizatiilor, fiind favorizati".

Ea a adaugat ca "vechiul sistem a fost corupt, de la cel mai inalt nivel pina la ultima maternitate, insa nu a fost nimeni pedepsit". Bogdan Panait, presedintele Autoritatii pentru Protectia Copilului (ANPDC) spune ca "majoritatea sumelor luate pentru copiii romani ramineau in strainatate, unde erau folosite inclusiv in campaniile electorale ale politicienilor care sustineau adoptiile internationale".

Luati pe semnatura

Secretarul de stat ORA explica numarul mare de copii care au mers la o familie straina prin modalitatile foarte simple prin care se faceau adoptiile, dar si prin existenta retelelor de trafic. "Inainte de 1997, adoptia se facea la primaria de comuna. Venea mama copilului, care semna ca isi da copilul spre adoptie, apoi semna si familia adoptatoare de luare in primire. Tranzactia se facea usor, iar copilul ajunsese ca o marfa", potrivit Theodorei Bertzi. Sistemul de traficare a copiilor, semnalat atit de comunitatea europeana, cit si de reprezentantii ONG-urilor si ai celor care se ocupa de protectia copilului, se afla acum intr-un proces de "adormire", in asteptarea deblocarii adoptiilor internationale, a adaugat reprezentantul ORA.

Nepotism intre ONG-uri si stat

Inainte de moratoriul instaurat in 2001, prin care se inchidea provizoriu supapa adoptiior internationale, legislatia romana "facea clar legatura intre copii si bani, care au dus la coruperea sistemului", spune Bertzi. Ea sustine ca au fost mai multe metode folosite pentru traficul de copii, incalcari clare ale legislatiilor internationale semnate si de Romania.

Una dintre acestea a fost crearea unei retele interne, bazate pe nepotism, intre reprezentantii institutiilor statului care aveau in grija copiii si ONG-urile autorizate sa faca adoptii internationale. "Am aflat de sefi, care erau la Biroul de Adoptii, a caror fiica era avocat si lucra la o firma de adoptii. Deci iata cum circula informatia. Sau o directoare de leagan, sau fost leagan, a carei fata avea o fundatie, in legatura cu alta fundatie din afara, tot avocata fata. Ea stia clar unde, care sint copiii, familiile care veneau si ii aduceau acolo. In momentul in care aveau familii care doreau un copil, imediat acesta era facut adoptabil. Astea nu erau in lege incompatibilitati, dar ele existau. De asta nici nu puteau fi pedepsite", povesteste Bertzi.

Mamele, pacalite de stat si de avocati

O alta metoda de obtinere a unui copil roman a fost pacalirea sistematica a mamelor, in special dupa 1997. Pe de o parte, avocatii ONG-urilor interesate le convingeau pe mame, de obicei sarace, ca le e mai bine copiilor sa fie crescuti citiva ani de familii bogate din strainatate. In final, mamele semnau un act notarial prin care erau de acord sa-si dea copiii familiilor din strainatate, fara sa stie insa ca despartirea era definitiva, spune Bertzi.

Paralel, asistentii sociali incercau sa desparta copilul de mama, iar personalul leaganului unde era plasat copilul nu trecea in registru vizitele rudelor sau ale mamei. Astfel ca, potrivit legii, daca un copil aparea in evidente ca nu a fost vizitat de familia sa timp de mai mult de sase luni, el devenea adoptabil. Inainte de 1997, reteaua de trafic era in maternitati sau sectiile de pediatrie. "Cine avea informatiile? Personalul medical care lucra acolo. Categoric exista o remuneratie pentru treaba asta. E greu de dovedit, pentru ca nici una dintre parti nu ar avea vreun interes sa spuna ca a dat/da sau a luat bani", spune seful ORA.

Theodora Bertzi mai arata ca a inceput sa primeasca plingeri de la mamele pacalite in trecut, care cer acum sa li se dea copiii inapoi, dar autoritatile nu mai pot face nimic pentru acestea.

Supapa traficului a fost inchisa

Autoritatile romane sustin ca acum, in Romania, nu mai exista cadrul care sa permita un asemenea tip de trafic de copii. "Nu se mai poate face trafic acum. Exista o procedura clara, este legea asta noua care ii leaga de miini", spune Theodora Bertzi. Parere impartasita si de secretarul de stat Bogdan Panait: "Legea le-a taiat mult din elan. Noi nu am avut semne ca s-ar mai intimpla astfel de lucruri, plus ca fundatiile corupte nu mai au autorizatie sau nu mai au obiect de activitate acum". Diana Nistorescu de la FONPC spune: "Imi e foarte greu sa cred ca se fura copii din maternitati sau ca exista retele de trafic. Astfel de informatii transpira de obicei, fiind vorba despre sume mari de bani".


Sursa: Cotidianul

 

 

 

Orphans caught in the middle

Orphans caught in the middle 
By Noelle Knox, USA TODAY
BUCHAREST, Romania — Vasile doesn't know it, but he and the other 84,381 orphaned children in Romania are at the heart of a high-powered dispute that will decide where they can grow up. (Related photo gallery: The Romanian adoption ban)

Linda Robak takes her adopted daughter Laura, 5, to meet her biological family in Romania.
By Dinu Lazar, Getty Images for USA TODAY

David Clark blinks back tears as he talks about how his family in Leawood, Kan., wants to adopt 6-year-old Vasile but is afraid the documents won't be signed before a Romanian law, expected to be passed by the end of the month barring any last-minute compromise, ends international adoptions in this country forever.
Romanians know that's a drastic measure, but they argue it is the only way to stop the widespread corruption that has blurred the lines between adoption and child trafficking in too many cases.
International pressure has been building since the country put a temporary moratorium on inter-country adoptions in 2001. About 1,000 children have been allowed to leave through exemptions for children who are handicapped or older than 3, because their chances of finding families in Romania are so small. Those exemptions would essentially end under the proposed law.
Vasile has spent almost all of his life in orphanages.


"I think we could give him a good home," Clark says. He and his wife have a daughter adopted from Romania and another from China, plus a biological daughter and son.
Americans have adopted almost 8,300 children from Romania since the overthrow of Nicolae Ceausescu in 1989. Pictures of thousands of underfed and abused children in the country's prison-style orphanages sparked worldwide outrage and a huge demand for international adoption.And while the work of many adoption agencies is noble, stories of corruption dog the industry.
 

Pressure to allow adoptions 

Ok..i am not really good at linking stuff, so I have just lifted the whole story from guardian…nice!

Ok..i am not really good at linking stuff, so I have just lifted the whole story from guardian…nice!

LENE Kamm came to Lagos from Denmark last week to attend a conference. But she used the opportunity to search for her father, Emmanuel Owhin whom her Danish mother, Else Gyring Nielsen said is a Nigerian. Born in Denmark in 1957, Lene’s story was published last Saturday in The Guardian. But as it turned out, her father died in 1982.
However, she didn’t come in vain for she was able to unite with her half brothers and sister as well as other members of the family who read her story in The Guardian. The reunion was made possible through the effort of her half sister, Sarah Owhin who returned from London a day after the publication oblivious of it all.
Sarah, 35, recalled that her phone kept ringing around 8 pm last Saturday but she initially ignored it because she didn’t want to be disturbed at that hour of the day. Besides she had just returned from London.
Unknown to her, it was one of her friends, Austin Eni Okojie calling all the way from Abuja. Her mother, Josephine Owhin, urged her on to pick her phone and answer her caller. She eventually did so in disguise. The dialogue, according to Sarah, went thus:
“Can I speak to Sarah?”, asked Okojie.
“No, Sarah is not around; she’s in London. It is Esther her daughter,” she replied.
“Please call Sarah in London and tell her that one of her sisters from Denmark is looking for her father Emmanuel Owhin and wants to meet with his children or relatives.”
“How did you get to know about it,?”
“The story is in The Guardian of today”
She thanked him and pondered in her mind who this person could be. For Sarah, a graduate of Ondo State University who is now based in London, the next step was how to locate Lene in Lagos. She contacted The Guardian to make enquiries.
She was eventually taken to meet Lene with her mother Josephine at the head office of Support A Child, organisers of the workshop that brought Lene to Nigeria, at Victoria Island. There, she was interrogated by Mrs. Abisola Williams, mother of Olatoun Williams, organizer of the workshop.
Sarah’s mother explained that Emmanuel Owhin was her husband and that they met while she was working with the Pilgrimage Board in Lagos and he Owhin was managing director of his company, Fountain Services, an advertising and publishing company based in Ebute-Metta, Lagos in 1968. She explained that her husband was a freelance advertiser with Daily Times at that time. She later tied the nuptial knots with him and the union is blessed with three children: Sarah, Emmanuel (Jnr) and Samson.
Mrs. Williams called people such as Prince Tony Momoh, former minister of information and one time editor of Daily Times to confirm the authenticity of the story. She also called Jane Ejueyitchie-Oroye, a former principal of Oueen’s College Lagos and an Itsekiri woman to ascertain whether she knew anyone called Emmanuel Owhin. She discovered that Emmanuel Owhin’s grandmother was an Itsekiri woman and she lived and died in Lagos.
Linkage confirmed, Olatoun Williams came to take Sarah and her mother to meet Lene who was staying at an hotel in Ikoyi. On sighting her sister, Lene broke into tears. She was consoled by Sarah who said: “God just decided to unite you with your family, since you have been nice to many people helping them to reunite with their families. You don’t need to cry.”
From there, Lene was taken to the family house in Mushin. There, she took so many pictures and met some other of her relatives. Later in the day, her brother, Mark Owhin who had just come from the United Kingdom was hinted about the story and initially he could not believe it. Mark, who was born in 1962, is an engineer based in the UK. He also came to the hotel to be united with Lene. But he forgot his glasses in his car parked outside the hotel. So his sister, Lene, who also equally uses glasses, gave him her glasses for him to read her story in The Guardian.
“I am happy to meet my sister. We are going to keep in touch. We are going to be exchanging letters and we look forward to more good things to come,” he enthused.
Lene is happy that her colleagues from Denmark have already found some resemblance in her and her Sarah. Lene reached her children in Demark and they had a live communication with her brother. Her son, Jens, a lawyer, was very happy that at last, his mother has discovered her roots.

Posted in RELATIONSHIPS

Post navigation

< PreviousFound my school mother after 19yrs!

Irina was told her twins died after birth. Decades later, she discovered it was part of a scheme

Thousands of Georgians are coming to terms with a black-market adoption scandal in which children were stolen from maternity hospitals from the 1970s to the mid-2000s.


Irina always thought that the suitcase buried underneath a tree in her backyard contained the remains of her twin sons who had died shortly after birth, in 1978.
"When I gave birth, the doctor said to me: 'Do you have the means to raise these children?" she recalled decades later.
Three days after they were born, Irina was told the babies didn't survive. As instructed by the doctors, her husband brought a cloth and a suitcase to bury them in.
Since they couldn't find a cemetery plot, they buried the suitcase in their garden, unopened.
For more than 40 years, the suitcase and its contents laid untouched, until Irina's daughter Nino came across a Facebook group filled with stories of children searching for parents and parents searching for children.
Black-market adoptions and child trafficking had thrived in Georgia for decades from the Soviet era in the 1970s until the mid-2000s, when tougher laws were introduced.
Experts who have spoken to those affected by the scandal said a culture of shame surrounding adoption was one of the reasons the practice lasted so long underground.
Others believed high-level government officials were complicit and some of those involved might still be working in Georgian hospitals today.
"I read a few [Facebook] posts and then I couldn't read any more," Nino said.
Parents said in the posts they had been told their children had died but never saw the bodies — something that sounded familiar to Nino.
She asked her sister Nana: "Did our brothers really die?"
The family grew suspicious of the twins' fate and decided to dig up the suitcase in the backyard.
For more than 40 years, a suitcase was buried in Irina's garden believed to contain her twin sons' remains. Source: BBC

Inside, they found a couple of twigs, which the police later said were from a grape vine.
"We were completely shocked," Nino said. "There’s nothing inside. They’re probably alive."
 

Searching for answers

In 2016, Georgian journalist Tamuna Museridze was cleaning out her mother's house after she unexpectedly died. She found a birth certificate with her name but with a different birthdate.
In Georgia, every woman receives an official document after giving birth. But when Museridze went to the archives, she found no such document existed for her mother.
She concluded that her mother didn't give birth to her, so she must have been adopted. When her family refused to talk about it, Museridze set out to find answers.
She and her friend set up a Facebook group called "I'm searching". It quickly exploded. In post after post, people shared how they too, were looking for their biological parents and siblings.
Museridze's research found that the trafficking of babies was happening in at least 20 hospitals across Georgia. Many were in rural areas, like Kvareli, a small town in east Georgia, where Irina and her family lived.
Georgian journalist Tamuna Museridze accidentally found out she wasn't her mother's biological child. When she set out to find answers, she uncovered an old illegal adoption scheme that had thrived across Georgia. Source: BBC

Fundraiser by Penny Keesee : Aid Pamela Keesee's Medical Journey

Aid Pamela Keesee's Medical Journey

My mom, Pamela Keesee, age 69, had a major stroke on January 14, 2025. She was rushed to the ER in Brenham, TX, and later moved to Memorial Hermann Hospital for treatment and physical therapy. She was then moved to Katy Encompass Rehab facility where they would evaluate and help her recover. Finally, she was moved to Katy Silvercrest Memory and Assisted Living until she heals.

This would be her 6th stroke with 2 major and 4 minor. This would be the first time she has experienced cognition problems leading to longer stays. However, all the medical bills came at once and are too much for me and my mom to pay, and would love help in our times of need.

Statement in response to Inea's Linkedin post about Adoption Breakfast.


LAVA and AVGG have applied for and received a subsidy from Inea for organizing the adoption breakfast . In accordance with the subsidy conditions, we have
listed Inea's contribution on the website.

We were surprised to learn that Inea
distanced itself so openly from the meeting on Linkedin on 12 March 2025. In the relevant Linkedin post, Inea states that the
final implementation of the meeting does not fit within Inea's mission and vision.

First of all, we are curious about what Inea based this judgment on. LAVA and AVGG
organized this meeting to update members of parliament and their employees on the
(im)possibilities of the phase-out plan, both legally and socially, emotionally and socially.
In our opinion, the meeting worked out exactly as indicated in the request for proposals.
In addition, permit holders, parents and adoptees were involved in the organization and the
organization was organized by two associations together. It is precisely on this subject that it is good to
seek connection and in our opinion this fits within Inea's mission and strategy.

In addition, Inea's attitude surprises us even more, because the approval for the subsidy
was only given on March 6 (one day after the meeting). Due to malfunctions in the system, Inea was behind in
processing applications. In our opinion, Inea was therefore able to
inquire in advance about the elaboration of the meeting at all times.

We deeply regret that Inea, after the commotion caused by a small but very verbal group of
radically critical people, feels compelled to self-censor its own decisions
. In our opinion, this shows that Inea is mainly there for those who
are critical of adoption. Inea should be objective and independent and for all adoptees. However, because
this post also suggests that LAVA and AVGG have done something that would not be in line with
the application, we feel compelled to publicly distance ourselves from these claims. In addition,
we will file a formal complaint about this course of events.

Adoption: Superheroes in Motion

About this group

De virtuele ontmoetingsplaats voor geadopteerde en opgezet door geadopteerden.

Deel je verhaal, je vreugde, je verdriet en alles wat met jouw adoptie te maken heeft. Zoek de empowerment in jezelf en bij anderen.

Dit is een online initiatief van stichting YAYA,

voor meer informatie neem contact op met: