In a growing number of countries, inquiries into past intercountry adoptions take place that identify systemic abuses and irregularities and conclude that adoption stakeholders encouraged or facilitated illegal intercountry adoptions. However, so far, the response from these stakeholders has been inadequate in addressing the profound human rights violations endured by those affected by illegal adoptions. Despite the growing movement of adoptees advocating for justice on behalf of themselves and their birth families and communities, adoption stakeholders in both sending and receiving countries have remained largely passive, lacking a coherent strategy to confront and rectify illegal intercountry adoptions. This inertia is exacerbated by the wide gap in adequate regulations regarding remedies and reparations for illegal intercountry adoptions

Facing the Past: Policies and Good Practices for Responses to Illegal Intercountry Adoptions aims to fill this critical gap by offering insights and recommendations to guide the process of reconciliation. Bringing together the contributions from scholars from various disciplines and adoptees themselves, this volume presents and discusses actionable measures that adoption stakeholders in both sending and receiving countries can employ to address the injustices inflicted upon victims of illegal intercountry adoptions. Targeting a diverse audience, including academics, policymakers, and adoption stakeholders, the book seeks to foster a path toward healing and accountability within the complex terrain of intercountry adoption.

Duration: August 2021 - February 2023 

Commissioned by: PNR 76, national research programme welfare and coercion | website
 

In partnership with Child Identity Protection | website  (for more information including results and presentations)

CONTEXT

Mia Dambach, Co-Founder and Executive Director for Child Identity Protection, on her work as a children’s solicitor in Australia, why ensuring children’s identity protection worldwide is important and the role of her many backgrounds in her daily life.

Dear Mia, you have studied at University of Sydney were you did a Bachelor in Law and a Bachelor in Commerce with a triple major in accounting, marketing and economics before doing your Master of Laws (LL.M.). How did you end up volunteering at a local children’s court during your studies?

​

While I was studying law at the University of Sydney, I wanted to gain some work experience to confirm my desire to work with children. I contacted the local children's court closest to the University to see if they needed any administrative help, which would give me the opportunity to watch the closed proceedings. They offered me work, archiving and writing letters to the children following a decision by the children's court magistrate. This allowed me to get a first-hand look at the cases and types of sentences children were given for different offences. Eventually, they allowed me to be a children's court monitor/officer, which is the person who runs the court in terms of saying "silence, please, all stand" when the children's magistrate enters and leaves the court and also records the different proceedings. After a few months, one of the paid staff went on maternity leave and the Children's Court offered me a part time paid position that I could carry out whilst finishing my law degree. This experience confirmed my desire to work as a children's lawyer as well as to learn the different ways that children could be defended well in court.

DCOF-UNICEF ASSESSMENT OF “STRENGTHENING SYSTEMS TO PROTECT VULNERABLE CHILDREN AND FAMILIES IN CAMBODIA”

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report describes the outcomes of the joint DCOF/UNICEF visit to Cambodia to assess the three-year, DCOF-funded project on Strengthening Systems to Protect Vulnerable Children and Families in Cambodia. The assessment visit was carried out in May 2012, toward the end of the project (September 2012). 

Overall, the team found that much progress had been made in terms of legislative developments, such as the Prakas on Alternative Care; the development of minimum standards for residential care, now being used in regular inspections; and the development of a database for residential care facilities and the children resident within them. Other activities benefiting children directly have also taken place, such as working with the Buddhist Leadership Initiative on supporting vulnerable children and families, and the Partnership Program for the Protection of Children (3PC) that UNICEF has initiated with Friends International, which involves a collaboration of nine nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) providing services for children in a number of provinces in Cambodia. 

The work in Cambodia seems to have proven somewhat challenging, but government capacity is now developing and attitudes toward alternative care are showing greater understanding of those issues. However, the systems put into place still appear to require external support (much like the health and education system) in order to embed themselves firmly in governmental practice at all levels and to be useful in the development of a wider child protection system. 

BRUSSELS, Belgium -- Sixteen people, including a former UNICEF official, were convicted Monday of participating in a child sex ring that used a lab in the cellar of a UNICEF office to develop pictures of children in obscene acts.

Jozef Verbeeck, 63, former director of the Brussels office of the U.N. Children's Fund, was sentenced by a Belgian district court to two years in prison for his part in the scandal.

The ring used an organization called CRIES, a French acronym for 'Study and Research Center on Children and Sexuality,' as a cover for its operations.

Verbeeck was charged with knowledge of the group's activities, coordinated by Michel Felu, a UNICEF employee who installed a photo lab in the cellar of the UNICEF office to develop pictures of children engaged in obscene acts.

Felu was sentenced to eight years in prison. Other ring members, ranging in age between 30 and 64, received prison sentences of four to 10 years.

A mother is speaking out after she says her 12-year-old daughter was denied a place on the heart transplant list at Cincinnati Children's Hospital because of her vaccination status.

Brayton and Jeneen Deal, who adopted Adaline from China, said she was born with two heart conditions that will now require a transplant.

When the Deals were in the process of adopting Adaline, the adoption agency told them to pick another child because "her heart was so bad, she wasn't going to make it," they wrote in a GoFundMe campaign.

"We continued to support Adaline so she could stay in a foster home, but shortly after we arrived home with our other adopted child, the agency stopped taking the funds out of our account," they wrote.

"So, we thought she had passed away."

Broadcaster KRO-NCRV is 'happy to talk' to a woman who was linked to the wrong family in the program Spoorloos . The broadcaster announced this in response to an article in the Volkskrant , in which the woman told her story on Wednesday. Her real family has already passed away.

The woman, Marthainès de Vries, was linked by Spoorloos to a family that turned out not to be her real family more than twenty years later. De Vries later found her real family herself, but her father and mother had already passed away. "I am so sad, and so angry with Spoorloos . If the editors had done their job properly, I could have spent another nine years with my real mother and eleven years with my father. Now they are dead. I will never get that time back," De Vries told the newspaper . De Volkskrant also writes that De Vries has started a crowdfunding campaign to finance a possible lawsuit.

KRO-NCRV states in a written response that it finds it 'very sad and regrettable' that an incorrect match has been established. "We have been in discussions with Mrs. De Vries for months about her doubts and have immediately offered her to conduct further DNA research, which she has not wanted to use." KRO-NCRV writes that it is happy for her that she has found her own biological family in Colombia.

"We realise that she still has many questions and so do we. Mrs De Vries has informed us that she will contact us further. We would like to talk to her personally. We believe that this constructive approach does more justice to the situation, in which there is a lot of personal suffering." The broadcaster believes that it is 'not the right route' to discuss it via the media.

The Kerala High Court ruled that prospective adoptive parents must be given child study report and medical examination report to review when they are referred the profiles of children for possible adoption.Justice C.S. Dias referred to Section 59 (6) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act of 2015 and Adoption Regulations of 2022 to state that child study report and...

Kochi: The procedure for adopting a child must be approached with empathy, humane consideration and a holistic perspective that resonates with the anxiety of an adoptive couple, rather than adhering strictly to procedural rigidity and pedantic interpretations, the HC has stated.

"Matters involving children cannot be confined to the four corners of legal technicalities; they demand a compassionate and progressive approach that prioritizes the child's best interest," added the bench led by Justice C S Dias. The bench made these remarks in response to a petition filed by a couple challenging the decision of the Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA) to bar them from adopting a child for one year. The bench set aside this decision and directed the Authority to give the petitioners another opportunity to adopt a child as per the law, within a month.

The petitioners, who had previously adopted a five-year-old boy, approached CARA in 2021 to adopt a girl child. They registered on the designated portal, ‘Child Adoption Resource Information and Guidance System' (CARINGS), and after a four-year wait, were provided the details of a girl child for adoption on Nov 11, 2024. They were required to reserve the child within 48 hours. However, the necessary study and medical reports, which are mandated by law, were not attached to the child's details. The petitioners contacted the authorities, and the reports were provided a day later. By the time they attempted to reserve the child, the details had been removed from their dashboard due to the lapse of the 48-hour window. As a result, they were debarred for a year, which led them to approach the high court.

The court noted that the decision to debar the couple, due to the absence of the mandated reports, was arbitrary. It emphasized that the case was not a commercial dispute requiring strict adherence to timelines but rather involved an adoptive couple's deep and enduring desire for a child, which had caused them significant anguish for the past four years.

Maxance was placed at birth to escape abusive parents. He is now 18 years old, is a brilliant student and today tells us about his extraordinary journey.