Home  

The Building of the Hatch Family

The Building of the Hatch Family


e-mail
print
bookmark

 

 

 

 

Currently 0/5 Stars.
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 You may use the stars on the left to rate and leave feedback for the
current article. No registration is required.Waiting for 5 votes

 


 Emerson DOB 03-15-00 Gotcha Day 3-5-02, birth country: India
Logan DOB 02-07-01 Gotcha Day 9-7-01, birth country: Guatemala
Audrey DOB 10-27-02, biological child

*I have included a glossary of some of the Indian terms at the end of our
story. I want to apologize for the length and detail. I have tried for over
a year to condense this story, and this is the best that I can do. There is
so much to tell, the story is truly amazing and at times unbelievable.
Please feel free to take notes and ask questions. We have video, photos and
all of the newspaper articles that are discussed throughout.

 

advertisement

 

 

Ours is not a "typical" family and our story is far from typical. We
experienced love, hope, frustration, loneliness, hopelessness, distress,
fear, perseverance and victory in building our home through adoption.
Logan's adoption was very easy and eleven weeks, and Emerson's was a
twenty-month nightmare. We prayed for babies and were blessed with three!

Dan and I got married in November of 1999 and had been friends since our
early teens. We were ready to start a family but I suffer from Crohn's
Disease and was in remission for a few months when we decided adoption would
be a better route at that time.

July 2000: We accepted the referral of our little angel, Zuleika, from
India. We were so excited! She was everything we ever imagined and MORE!

November 2000: late in the month we finish Emmy's nursery thinking she will
be home early 2001 only to have it sit empty for almost 18 months. There
were several months I did not even set foot in that room for fear of
breaking down. It was so hard to see her crib and toys and know that she was
thousands of miles away.

January 2001: Things were progressing nicely with our case in India when a
terrible earthquake shock Gujarat, India. Our daughter was in a private,
Christian Orphanage in Hyderabad, India, Andhra Pradesh which is very far
from Gujarat but things would slow down all over the country.

February 2001: Our case was postponed in Family Court twice awaiting
guardianship.

April 27, 2001: The Government of Andhra Pradesh (GOAP) raided several
Christian Orphanages and seized hundreds of innocent children. The children
were taken to the state run Shishu Vihar which was not capable of housing or
caring for them. At the time of the raid, Emmy was 13 months old and 18
pounds. She was able to pull herself to stand and was starting to try and
walk.

In the next few months there were daily newspaper articles written and the
Director of our Orphanage in India (Anita Sen of Precious Moments) was taken
to prison where she served 64 days. To date, she still has charges to be
filed against her (she is currently in the US visiting her daughter and
family). One day we would be told we were not getting the children and the
next we would be getting them. It was heartbreaking and depressing. We had
some friends that we caught in the adoption scandal that went to the state
run home to visit our daughter while visiting their child (who was not
seized) only to find out the kids names were changed and they brought out a
different child for her to see.) A month later our friend from our church
who happens to be from AP, India went over to do missionary work and he went
to see Zuleika (Emmy) and they showed him the wrong child also. We just
wanted our daughter and we were caught in the middle of a religious and
political battle in India. The GOAP and NGO's (Non Government Organizations)
screamed child trafficking. The newspapers sensationalized the facts to
support the current government with upcoming elections in the near future.

June 1, 2002: Dan and I decide to further build our family through another
adoption and continue trying to get Emerson (Zuleika) and keep fighting to
get her home. We accept the referral of our son Logan William Mauricio in
Guatemala. We hired a second agency that had Logan's referral. He was an
abandonment case and things were supposed to move quickly. We were terrified
to fall in love with another child and so scared that he too would never
come home. He was in a private foster home and was thriving

August 2001: I go to Guatemala with another friend who is adopting an older
child there to visit Logan and her daughter. The Director of Logan's agency
suggested that I go to visit him since I was so sad that both of my children
were so far away and I was having a very difficult time dealing with the
uncertainty. She made a GREAT suggestion! The moment I laid eyes on him, all
the months of waiting and loneliness were gone. It was one of the best
moments of my life to hold my little guy! He wasn't scared of the crying
blonde woman kissing and hugging him. His foster father had picked us up at
the airport and told me that I would be returning to Guatemala in 3 weeks to
bring Logan home. I was hesitant to believe this since I had a huge chip on
my shoulder with Emmy's adoption but Feliciano, his foster father, was
right.

September 2-7, 2001: Dan and I go to Guatemala to bring our son home. Dan
was nervous up until he went back to the US Embassy to pick up Logan's visa
to get into the USA. Things went smoothly and we arrived home to a huge
greeting at the Minneapolis airport.

December 2001: We hear from our first adoption agency that we have been
granted guardianship of Emmy in the Family Court in Hyderabad, India. We
also get an update on her size, 13 pounds. She had lost 5 pounds in the care
of the GOAP. We arranged for another parent who was traveling with her
father to bring Emmy home. All the paperwork was set but we ran into, yet
another problem. When the faxed copy of our guardianship papers arrived
there was an error that needed to be corrected and the State would not
accept a fax. We live in Wisconsin and the state requires the original
papers to allow the US visa. By this time the other family had left and Emmy
would not arrive home on Christmas as promised. We had the processing agency
in India overnight the original guardianship papers after they were
corrected in the court and we drove them to Madison and the State signed off
on them.

January 2002: We now had arranged for our friend from church to escort Emmy
home since he was back in India. We ran into another problem; the processing
agency no longer wanted a man escorting a girl child. Our friend is a Non
Resident Indian man who has four children of his own and is married to one
of our good friends. He attends our church and does missionary work in India
with his family. This was not really the truth. A newspaper article came out
in one of the Indian papers that "exposed" confidential information from our
dossiers. Several families were attacked in this article written by a woman
who works for several NGO's (UNICEF being one of her large funding sources).
She deemed me an unfit parent since I suffered from Crohn's Disease. I was
horrified that this information was in the newspapers for public review. It
finally came out that the Director of the processing agency was doubting my
health and I was told if I wanted my child I would have to travel to India
and get her myself. I was terrified to travel to India and leave Logan. Dan
and I agreed that we could not both go and leave him and since I had to go
my father volunteered to go with me. We were going to fly over and get her
and return in 5 days. We arrived in India on a holiday and had a day to rest
until ANOTHER PROBLEM arose. John (our friend from church) was still in
India and met us at the processing agency where the Director had her staff
doctor examine me. The doctor expressed that I was in fine health and saw no
problem. We were then sent to Shishu Vihar to meet with the Director to get
Emmy. We waited for hours and finally got a meeting with Ms. Shalini Mishra.
She told me flat out that I would not get my baby and that there were "new
developments" in my case waving the newspaper article in my face. I
immediately asked for foster care of my daughter since all the reports of
her health were terrible and I thought I could nurse her back to health and
start bonding if she was with me. That also was denied.

We were told to stay in India for 10 days while the National Human Rights
Committee made its decision regarding my adoption. I broke down in tears. 10
days! 10 days in India, away from my baby and husband and no foster care for
my daughter. I asked to go and visit her and was told visitation was one
hour a day in the evening and to return. I was beside myself and we returned
later that day and were denied visitation. Thank goodness John was with and
had visited the prior summer and talked the Orphanage Director into us
seeing Emmy. When I asked to see Zuleika they told me there was no Zuleika.
My heart sank since I was staring at a black board that had all the numbers
of the children seized from each agency and how many children were ill in
the hospital and how many children had "EXPIRED". It was sick. I got out
some photos of Emmy and they told me she was now named "Jasmine" and went to
get her. It was horrific when they brought out my daughter, she was skin and
bones. Her head had been shaven, she was covered in scabies, her eyes were
sunken, and her skin was grey (we have photos from the parents in December).
She was the size of an infant not a 22 month old child. She could not put
any weight on her legs and could barely hold her head up. She was
dehydrated, weak, and starving.

From then on things grew considerably worse. I hired an Indian attorney and
sued the GOAP for immediate custody of Emmy. I was in the headlines the next
day and for the next two months after that. The papers followed my father
and me and we moved from one hotel to another. The NGO activists filed
counter suits against me in the Indian courts and tried to stop my every
move. Confidential information from our home study was published in the
papers; the list goes on and on. I was made a political pawn in the midst of
the local government elections. I appeared at the High Court of Andhra
Pradesh for my case against the GOAP to be heard, and it was postponed time
and time again. I was continually denied visitation to my child at the state
run orphanage. I was not allowed to take photos or video of my own child.
When I was allowed visitation, I was observed by several staff and limited
to one hour visits. My father and I would take turns holding Emmy and
singing to her and hugging her. We showed her photos of her home and family
that was waiting for her and we fed her. We had to physically pour Pedilyte
down her throat since she didn't know how to drink from a cup or bottle. She
was so weak and sad; it was heartbreaking to leave her there.

We met with several GOAP officials and were always told they were looking
into our case. No one would give us a straight answer. We tried several
times to meet with the Chief Minister who had the authority to enforce our
guardianship papers only to be denied appointments. We would sit in the GOAP
offices at the Secretariat for hours on end and sometimes split up to try
and catch an appointment with the Director of the WDCW, Shalini Mishra, only
to waste our time. The activists were always one step ahead of us; meeting
with all of the officials and telling them I was unfit to be a parent and
demanding that Zuleika remain in India.

Our case was postponed again in late January and my father and I returned
home to the US. My son, Logan, was turning one and I was not about to miss
his 1st birthday. We were home for two weeks and in that time found out that
we won our case against the GOAP in the High Court but were advised by our
attorneys to wait until they had a Government Order stating that Zuleika be
handed over to me to come back to India. My father and I left in mid
February 2002 to try and get custody of Zuleika.

Upon our return to India we were again denied appointments by all GOAP
officials and visitation of Zuleika. The Director of WDCW ignored the GO
from her higher ups and would not give me custody of my baby. Again, we were
in the papers on a daily basis and followed. I had written orders from high
ranking GOAP officials and could not get my child out of the care of the
GOAP. The NGO activists were relentless and were angry that the case had
been won in my favor. They were determined to stop Zuleika from leaving
India.

We were stuck in India for another 2 weeks trying to get custody. We finally
got a lead with a reporter who was willing to put my side of the story in
the news; he was going out on a limb. He fought for me and got me front page
news with all the court rulings and GO's in my favor in the paper and none
of the GOAP officials would comment. We also got news coverage from the
local Telegu newspaper who was horrified that the Director was deliberately
disobeying the Indian court rulings and GO's. It still did not get Zuleika
released into my custody. We ended up going to the Opposition Party to seek
intervention. The party leader was amazing; he got us an appointment with
the Chief Minister within minutes and was so helpful and interested in our
case. He found it very curious why we didn't have custody since we had all
the legal documents and court rulings in our favor.

We were still forced to wait for the legal department of the GOAP to review
all the documents for a final ruling. The next day after meeting with the CM
we were told we would get Zuleika and that they were drafting the orders. We
never saw the orders as promised at noon, 3pm, 6pm. My lawyer was at the
Secretariat waiting for the documents and my father and I were waiting at
the orphanage. The orphanage was mysteriously closing early for the day. The
Director got word that Zuleika was going to be released and closed up shop
for the day! I continually called my lawyer and her direct boss and he
finally came himself. He arranged for the Director's assistant to come and
the release finally happened. It was Saturday March 2nd 2002. We waited
hours while Dr. Chellapa, past Secretary of the WDCW Department, arrived at
Shishu Vihar unannounced and toured the facility. He was horrified at the
condition of the children and the lack of care. He released Zuleika into my
care.

We were told to leave immediately and that the Director was on her way to
try and stop us. We went to the processing agency to get Zuleika's passport.
She was terrified. I was terrified. When we got back to our hotel around
midnight the phone rang off the hook, the press was calling to confirm all
the details of the night.

We left the next day to get her visa and were advised to take an alternate
flight to Chennai since the press was expecting us on the morning flight.
While waiting for our flight several people were reading the newspapers,
Zuleika's photo was everywhere and every paper covered the story. It was
horrible and everyone knew who we were. We arrived in Chennai in the evening
and were recognized upon arrival, we had the hotel hold all calls. We were
informed that we had several people trying to get through. My husband didn't
know where I was since we were advised not to call anyone.

We got Zuleika's visa the next day and stayed at the US Embassy all day
while they helped us change our flights. We heard that the NGO activists had
filed a lawsuit against us in the Supreme Court in Delhi to stop us from
leaving the country. We had to get out of India on the soonest possible
flight. The nightmare was still not over. We finally got out of the country
and arrived in London and were able to call home! We were SAFE!

 

advertisement

 

 

Want to adopt?Pregnant?click here


We arrived in Minneapolis on March 5, 2002 to an amazing homecoming all
caught on tape. It was surreal. 10 days later Emmy turned 2 and we found out
that I was pregnant. Another twist! We had never tried to conceive since I
had been on medication off and on for my Crohn's and now was expecting
another child. I had a healthy pregnancy and Audrey Ann arrived 2 weeks
early on October 27, 2002.

We built our family in 13 months, 3 children in 13 months. We prayed for
babies and God gave us 3! We feel truly blessed by our children and our
adoption experiences. As horrible as it was in India fighting for the
release of our child, it was such a wonderful experience for all of us. I
saw things that I was meant to see; I am still trying to help the other
waiting parents and am still trying to expose the corruption with the NGO's.


Glossary:

CM Chief Minister
GOAP Government of Andhra Pradesh
GO Government Order
Gotcha Day The day we got our children home to the US
NGO Non Government Organization
Telegu One of the local languages of Andhra Pradesh
WDCW Women Development & Child Welfare

Angelique Hatch - Her passion led to her appointment to International Children’s Services board

Published October 16, 2011, 10:16 AM
Her passion led to her appointment to International Children’s Services board
Angelique Hatch has been selected to join the board of directors for the Joint Council on International Children’s Services. Nothing could be more appropriate for the busy mother of four children, three of them adopted.
By: Margaret Ontl, Hudson Star-Observer

 .
Angelique Hatch, center, is surrounded by her children. In the front from the left are Audrey, 8, and Liam, 4. In the second row are Emerson, 11, Hatch and Logan, 10. Emerson was born in India. Logan and Liam were born in Guatemala. Submitted photo
 Talk about it Angelique Hatch has been selected to join the board of directors for the Joint Council on International Children’s Services. Nothing could be more appropriate for the busy mother of four children, three of them adopted.

“I don’t sit still well,” said Hatch. “This seems like a natural fit.” Even though the Angelique and Dan Hatch did not know it at the time, the work of the Joint Council is what allowed them to be grandfathered in for their the adoption of Liam from Guatemala. “They believe every child should have the opportunity to have a safe environment.”

The seeds of the present Joint Council were sown in 1975. However, in 2006, a transition began. Joint Council would transform itself from a trade association that served its members into a coalition of leading social service organizations that serve children and families. Their mission changed, programs expanded and they increased their impact, while continuing their focus, expertise and passion for ethical inter-country adoption.

Today the organization has a membership of over 250 organizations, $760 million in collective services and reaches into 52 countries with a base of over 60,000 supporters. Joint Council is aggressively moving forward to serve more children, strengthen more families and protect the right of every child to have a permanent, safe and loving family.

A Consultation on Definitions of Formal Care for Children: An Invitation to Participate

A Consultation on Definitions of Formal Care for Children: An Invitation to Participate

http://www.crin.org/docs/Definitions for Formal Care.doc

 Author: BCN, Save the Children, EveryChild, ISS Geneva, and SOS Kinderdorf International

Date: Wednesday, April 13, 2011

 

Chinese orphanages buying babies for foreign adoption, investigation finds

Chinese orphanages buying babies for foreign adoption, investigation finds    
From:         NewsCore       
October 14, 20114:30PM

 CHINESE orphanages may still be buying babies and offering them for foreign adoption, Sky News discovered in an investigation.    

It follows a series of scandals linking China's foreign adoption program to baby trafficking and the illegal confiscation of children.

Since international adoptions began in China in the early 1990s, more than 100,000 children have been adopted by foreign nationals. Adoptive couples are told by the Chinese authorities that the babies they adopt are either orphaned or abandoned.

But an undercover investigation by Sky found more than one government orphanage that would happily buy a baby that could have been kidnapped.

Lakshmi Krishnan - Udayan - SOS


Mrs Lakshmi Krishnan,

President

 

Mrs Lakshmi Krishnan, a qualified Social Worker, holds a Masters Degree in Social Work from the Delhi School of Social Work, University of Delhi. She also holds a degree in Home Science from University of Delhi. She has been in the field of Women and Child development for more than twenty seven years.

 

In the early part of her career, she was employed with CCF (Christian Children’s Fund) as a Social Worker and was engaged in Khrist Raja Family Helper Project of the Convent of Jesus and Mary School. Her job responsibilities included providing welfare and development programmes for the weaker section of the society. The girls belonging to this section were identified in school and the project involved   a close interaction with the parents and other members of the family and providing suitable help for their upliftment. The job profile also included providing help to the community in general.

 

The major portion of her employment was with “Udayan”, a project of SOS Childrens Villages of India. She was independent In-Charge of the project which provided shelter to abandoned and destitute babies/infants. She was independently running this home situated at Doctors Lane in Gole Market. During this period, she would have rehabilitated more than Two Thousand babies/infants by way of Adoption to needy couple or repatriation to the family. She had during this period handled babies / infants with serious medical problems and every day was a challenge because at any given point of time, there were more than twenty children at the home. She has effectively handled the needs of pre-term, high risk babies with complicated medical problems. This experience of more than twenty years has given her a rich exposure to handling a shelter home and understanding the needs of such homes from grass root level.

 

She has presented several papers and has been a resource person for several seminars in the field of adoptions. She has delivered several lecturers on family and child welfare issues in educational institutions (school, college and medical) as a part of their curricular and co-curricular activity. She has also been invited by several Television Networks as a Resource Person on Child Adoption issues. She has also given several interviews on Print Media. She has independently conceived and produced a documentary for Delhi Doordarshan titled “Blissful Parenting” which dealt with socio- psychological issues of Adoption.

 

She is at present actively involved with SPOWAC on a day to day basis and monitors all the programmes of this society. She maintains a close link with all Government Departments and handles all the reports and returns.

Indian Adoption Agency


SOS  Children's Villages of India
A-7,
Nizzamuddin (West)
New Delhi -110 013. 14/10/2008 
to
13/10/2009 91-011-23743739 91-011-24357298 
sos-udayan@rediffmail.com

Registered from 18/01/2010
to
17/01/2013
 

 

 

Malawi: Homosexuals barred from adopting children (and stronger laws)

Malawi: Homosexuals barred from adopting children

  1.
     Posted on Wednesday 12 October 2011 - 10:18
     Chancy
         * Profile
         * 1 messages
     Chancy Namadzunda, AfricaNews reporter in Lilongwe, Malawi
     The Malawi's Special Law Commission has barred homosexuals from adopting children, according to recommendations in the report released by the special commission which was entitled to review the Adoption of Children Act.
     homosexuals
     The report has put homosexuals among persons of unsound mind within the meaning of Mental Health Act, persons convicted of any offense set out in the schedule and a person who has been declared unsuitable or prohibited by a court of competent jurisdiction from working with children, as those prohibited to adopt.

     Commissioner Aubrey Mvula justified the barring of homosexuals saying the body recognizes that he relationship of man and woman constitutes a marriage.

     "We recognize the need to provide stable upbringing of the child and homosexuals are not proffered direction in adoption. We will not allow our children to be adopted by those practicing criminal acts in nature.

     "A normal life is seen in a family that is stable, that is a union between a man and a woman as provided by the constitution," said Mvula.

     Adoption laws in Malawi were widely questioned by human rights activist when the Pop Star Madonna adopted David Banda and later Mercy James, in a battle which was determined by the country's courts.

     The Adoption of Children Act was enacted by the colonial masters in
     1949 and had a lot of loopholes in it.

     "Technologies of globalization such as internet and easier and faster movement of people across borders have fuelled the cross-transferring of ideas, cultures and social behaviours which have in turn have a great effect on traditional and conventional conceptualizations of the good and bad.

     "As regards the bad, we as a country suddenly find ourselves faced with rising cases of child trafficking, child slavery and shopping from within and beyond Malawi,” he said.

     The legislation has also bars a sole male applicant to adopt a female child likewise a sole female applicant to adopt a male child.

     The legislation has also stiff penalties for flouting adoption regulations including a seven year jail sentence and K1 million fines for profiting from adoption.

     One could be sentences three years in jail for holding back information from authorities and could also be ordered to a pay a fine of K500, 000.00.

     The law also punishes advertisement of children for adoption by a prison sentence of seven years.

     “Interfering with the child’s upbringing is punishable by a fine of K200, 000.00. Tampering of documents will attract a seven-year sentence,” Malawi’s special Law Commission chairperson Judge Esmie Chombo said of the punishments.

     The Judge also disclosed that processing of inter-country adoption by any unauthorized agencies will attract a fine that will range from K500, 000 and K2 million.

     The proposed law will go for a legal scrutiny at the ministry of justice before being presented to cabinet and then to parliament for approval.

Court orders El Salvador to investigate children's disappearances

Court orders El Salvador to investigate children's disappearances

 
REPORTING FROM MEXICO CITY -- Human rights advocates are hailing an international court decision ordering the government of El Salvador to fully investigate the cases of hundreds of children who disappeared during the nation’s civil war three decades ago.

The Inter-American Court of Human Rights, based in San Jose, Costa Rica, found rights violations in the cases of six youngsters who vanished after being taken away by soldiers in 1981 and 1982.

One of the six children, Gregoria Contreras, 4 years old when she disappeared, was reunited with her family many years later after being tracked down by a Salvadoran group, the Assn. for the Search for Missing Children, also known as Pro-Busqueda. The group’s enduring search for children who went missing during the conflict was chronicled earlier this year by The Times here.

In its ruling, issued to the parties late last week, the court found what it called a “systematic pattern of forced disappearances of children” by army personnel battling leftist rebels. Many of the children, seized during raids, were placed into the lucrative international adoption market and raised abroad. Since 1994, Pro Busqueda has received reports of more than 800 children who vanished during the war. The group has located nearly half of them.

“The court recognizes the truth that was for years denied to relatives of the hundreds of [missing] children,” Pro-Busqueda’s director, Ester Alvarenga, said in a statement.

Salvadoran military authorities impeded investigations into the cases for many years. The leftist government of President Mauricio Funes, elected in 2009, has promised to investigate cases, but rights advocates say it has done little because of a lack of funds. Moreover, they say, few cases are likely to be solved unless the military is ordered to open files from the wartime period.

“One of the main difficulties in determining what happened to the disappeared children is obstruction by military forces when authorities charged with the investigation try to get information,” said Gisela De Leon, a lawyer for the Center for Justice and International Law who argued the case on behalf of the children. “The state will have to adopt measures to make sure that this doesn’t happen again.”

The case before the inter-American tribunal involved three sets of children who disappeared separately during the early 1980s.

China's Missing Children

China's Missing Children

As many as 70,000 Chinese kids may get kidnapped each year. Parents, who often have nowhere to turn to for help, are taking matters into their own hands.

BY CHARLES CUSTER | OCTOBER 10, 2011

BEIJING—On April 10, 2010, the Liu family was living the Chinese dream. The couple had moved to the city, rented an apartment, and were blessed with two beautiful children. They weren't rich, but they were getting by. Like many Chinese people, they felt their lives were getting better.

The next morning, strange men came to their house, grabbed their son Liu Jingjun, dragged him into a white van, and drove off. Since then, the Lius have been looking for him. They haven't found him, but they have discovered that there are an awful lot of people just like themselves.

Since at least the 1980s, kidnapping and human trafficking have become a problem in China, and most often, the victims are children. Estimates vary on just how bad things have gotten. The Chinese government reports that fewer than 10,000 children are kidnapped each year, but the U.S. State Department says it's closer to 20,000. Some independent estimates put the number as high as 70,000 (compared with 100 to 200 children kidnapped per year in the United States, for example).

The vast majority of kidnapped children will never see their families again. In China, kids are abducted not for ransom but for sale. Often, they come from poor and rural families -- the families least likely to be capable of tracking their kids down or fighting back. Some children are then sold to new "adoptive" families looking for children. Others are sold into slave labor, prostitution, or a life on the streets. In some cases, healthy children are brutally crippled by handlers on the theory that a child with broken legs or horrific boils looks sadder and can earn more money begging on the street.

Some children are even sold into adoption overseas. Chinese adoption agencies seeking the substantial donations foreign parents make when they adopt -- in some cases, as much as $5,000 -- have been known to purchase children from human traffickers, though these cases appear to be relatively rare.

Most instances of kidnapping are perpetrated by gangs that are large, national, and highly organized. Based on cases solved by Chinese police, it's not uncommon for some kidnapping rings to have dozens or even hundreds of members, and to be responsible for the kidnappings of hundreds of children.

The estimates vary so widely because official numbers are hard to come by and harder to trust. Pi Yijun, a professor at the Institute for Criminal Justice and an expert on crimes involving children, says, "Data about the dark side of society is extremely difficult to obtain, and even when it is made public, the Public Security Bureau [i.e., the police] only reports based on the number of cases they've uncovered." That means that China's official statistics on kidnapping are based only on cases that are proved to be crimes. Because most parents have no proof that their child was kidnapped (rather than running away on his or her own), many cases are filed as missing-person reports and thus go uncounted in official statistics.

On the morning of April 11, 2010, Mrs. Liu was in the apartment, but she and her husband's son -- just 2 at the time -- had wandered out the door and was playing with some other kids from the neighborhood. When she looked out the door and saw he was missing, she called her husband, and when the two of them still couldn't find the boy, they called the cops.

The police came. "They said nothing," said Mr. Liu. "They said, 'It's not urgent; just relax. Maybe he ran away by himself or he's at a neighbor's house. Just look around yourselves.'"

Other parents of kidnapped children say this is common; unless there's concrete, immediate proof of a kidnapping, police won't even accept a missing-person report until the subject has been missing for at least 24 hours.

Mrs. Zhu, the mother of kidnapped 12-year-old Lei Xiaoxia, who went missing on May 24 in Shanxi province, reported her daughter's case to anyone who would listen -- three different police authorities, her daughter's school, and even their city's education bureau -- but always got the same answer. "They said, 'All we can do is investigate for you; there's nothing we can really do [otherwise]."

These investigations leave much to be desired. Mrs. Zhu told me, "After we reported [the disappearance], they went out and patrolled for a bit, but after that we never saw them looking again." They also never went to the train station or the bus station to check the surveillance tapes, she said. Later, a reporter discovered that Zhu's daughter had been seen at school that day, but the police had also forgotten to check the school's security tapes, which had since been automatically deleted by the surveillance system. Lei Xiaoxia is still missing.

Even when police do investigate seriously, happy endings are rare. Trafficking gangs are highly organized. Children are moved over great distances and shuffled between handlers after they're kidnapped to ensure they are impossible to trace.

Li Yong, an adult who was kidnapped around 1988 and sold to another family when he was about 5 (he's not sure of his real age or birthday), remembers he was moved around quite a bit. "After I was kidnapped, I was taken into cars, a long-distance bus, and a train," he says. Years after his kidnapping, police finally tracked down one man involved with Li's kidnapping, but the trail ended there. The seller, the kidnapper, and the handlers who watched Li during various stages of his journey have yet to be found.

Investigating kidnapping cases effectively requires sustained effort, ongoing cooperation between numerous local precincts, and high-tech methods of tracking and identifying both kidnappers and children. When a particular gang gets onto the police's radar, higher authorities may help organize this sort of sustained effort, and when caught, human traffickers face stiff sentences and even the death penalty. But many kidnapping cases never make it past the local precinct, where they're filed as missing-person cases and, generally, forgotten.

Some parents accept their fates and wait quietly for a phone call from the police that will probably never come. But more and more parents are taking to the Internet and to the streets to search for their children.

"We look every day," Mr. Liu, a contract laborer, said. "Before my son was taken, I didn't know how to use the Internet, but now I go to an Internet cafe every day. I can't afford my own computer, so I go there to look for my son, making posts about him and searching through the Net."

An entire ecosystem of Internet services has sprung up for Chinese parents like Liu. Sites like "Baby Come Home" collect information, photos, and other data from tens of thousands of parents and help them publicize it all. They also collect photos and reports of street children for parents of kidnapped kids to browse, looking for their children.

Many parents also take to the street. Mr. Liu connected online with other parents of kidnapped children in his area, and now they organize events together. One of the parents, whose son was also kidnapped, has decorated his truck with photos of his son and dozens of other missing children. The parents pick a busy street corner, park the truck there, surround it with large posters about their children, and hand out fliers and cards to passers-by.

When he can, Liu brings his young daughter along to these events, where she helps her parents pass out flyers. She's too young to understand what happened to her little brother, but she hasn't forgotten him. She dreams about him, her father says. "When we hear her talk about him, it's devastating."

Some have placed the blame for China's child-trafficking problem squarely at the feet of the one-child policy, but that's an oversimplification according to Pi Yijun, of the Institute for Criminal Justice. Part of the problem is that compared with other things one might steal, such as cars or computers, children are easy to get ahold of and difficult to track, he says. "Additionally, if [the kidnapper] has got a buyer already, they can reap the rewards quickly, and I think that's an important reason" that kidnapping is so common in China.

Of course, without buyers there would be no sellers, and there are still buyers aplenty in China. True, the one-child policy has made children scarcer, but because families with more than one child -- regardless of whether the children are adopted or birthed -- must pay fines, there's no real reason for healthy parents to choose to purchase a kidnapped child rather than just having another one of their own. Often, the buyers of kidnapped kids are married couples who can't conceive or who have given birth to only daughters and want to be sure their next child is a son. Some families also buy older girls as brides for their sons if the son can't attract a wife through traditional means (often because of some mental or physical disability).

China's culture of silence also plays a role. "My son will never know he was kidnapped and purchased," Mr. Liu says. "In our hometown, when people buy wives, no one says anything. No one talks. Our child was too young to understand what happened to him; when he grows up he won't understand that it's all fake."

This is not an uncommon phenomenon. After Li Yong was kidnapped and sold to his new family in Jiangsu, he walked around telling neighbors his original name and asking to go home, speaking in a dialect foreign to that province. But no one reported anything to the authorities until more than a decade later, and by then, it was way too late. Many Chinese believe that getting involved in someone else's business is asking for trouble, and in some rural areas where education levels remain low, purchasing children is still considered an acceptable alternative for couples who are infertile or too old to conceive safely.

For his part, Mr. Liu doesn't blame the men who kidnapped his son. "We parents, the parents of lost children, hate these people, and society hates them too, but sometimes you can't blame human traffickers. Sometimes you have to blame our society. What I mean is, [in China] we still don't have a strong rule of law. If it were stronger, could this kind of thing happen?"

Mr. Liu and his wife are still searching for their son. Mrs. Zhu and her husband are still searching for their daughter. They work when they need to, but their lives are on hold until they get some news, just like the tens of thousands of other parents nationwide who are searching. "It's like we're living with dead hearts," Mrs. Zhu told me between sobs. "If we can't find our child, life is meaningless."

Authority to travel for talks on adoption agreements

The Irish Times - Monday, October 10, 2011

Authority to travel for talks on adoption agreements

CAROL COULTER

DELEGATIONS FROM the Adoption Authority of Ireland will travel to Mexico, the Philippines and the United States to discuss adoption agreements, the International Adoption Association was told at the weekend.

Geoffrey Shannon, chairman of the authority, told its annual conference it was in advanced discussions with a number of countries party to the Hague Convention on Inter-country Adoption after the incorporation of the convention into Irish law last year.