BUNDESTAG-UL GERMAN, ÎN "CONTROL" LA TIMI?OARA

BUNDESTAG-UL GERMAN, ÎN "CONTROL" LA TIMI?OARA Feti?a sechestrat? în Germania va fi readus? acas? Susanne Kastner, vicepre?edinte al Parlamentului federal german, a venit la Timi?oara pentru a se documenta despre soarta feti?ei românce, sechestrat? de trei ani la o familie german? din Bavaria. Ini?iativa Jurnalului Na?ional de a investiga acest caz de "adop?ie" a trezit interesul autorit??ilor federale germane. de Mircea Opris 6/06/2009 1037 vizite Într-o întâlnire privat? cu pre?edintele CJ Timi? ?i cu prefectul jude?ului, Susanne Kastner a declarat c? este ilegal faptul c? familia din Germania a ?inut-o pe minora Nicoleta Trif timp de trei ani acolo ?i c? autorit??ile române ?i germane vor declan?a o ac?iune comun? pentru readucerea în România a feti?ei. Între timp, presa din landul Bavaria a semnalat un al doilea caz în care o familie german? "între?ine" un copil român, în condi?ii similare, la limita legalit??ii. Identitatea celui de-al doilea copil ?i date despre caz nu au fost f?cute publice înc?, urmând ca autorit??ile germane s? declan?eze o anchet? privind acest al doilea caz ?i eventuale alte cazuri în care copii români au fost "adopta?i" de familii din Germania, lucru interzis prin lege. Cazul minorei Nicoleta Trif, ?inut? f?r? forme legale de o familie din Bavaria de mai bine de trei ani, a ajuns în aten?ia vicepre?edintelui Bundestag-ului, cel mai înalt for executiv din Germania. Susanne Kastner a f?cut o vizit? de trei zile la Timi?oara, Buzia? ?i Lipova unde a vizitat câteva centre pentru minori. La Timi?oara aceasta a avut o consultare privat? cu pre?edintele CJ Timi?, Constantin Ostaficiuc, prefectul de Timi?, Mircea B?cal? ?i cu directorul Direc?ie pentru Protec?ia Copilului Timi?, Rodica Negrea. Kastner a declarat c? este un act ilegal ac?iunea familiei Biemueller, cea care o ?ine practic sechestrat? pe micu?a din Giulv?z înc? din anul 2006. În toat? aceast? adop?ie mascat?, vinovate au c?zut Estera Schweitzer ?i Annelise Jugu, cet??ene româno-germane, care nu au f?cut altceva decât s? pun? în leg?tur? familia din Germania care de?ine feti?a cu familia natural? din România. IMPLICARE OFICIAL? Susanne Kastner a declarat în exclusivitate pentru Jurnalul Na?ional c? din punctul ei de vedere feti?a este ?inut? ilegal în Germania ?i c? în privin?a procesului în care sunt acuzate cele dou? cet??ene româno-germane pentru intermedierea copilului, Estera Schweitzer ?i Annelise Jugu, ea nu se poate pronun?a, deoarece în Germania puterile legislativ?, executiv? ?i judec?toreasc? sunt strict separate, iar politicienii nu au dreptul s? intervin? în actul de justi?ie. "Doamna Kastner a fost foarte ferm? ?i a spus c? trebuie aplicat? legea. Adop?iile interna?ionale din România sunt ilegale. Ea a condamnat atât familia german? care a acceptat s? pl?teasc? ni?te bani pentru a ?ine acest copil în Germania, cât ?i familia natural? a feti?ei care a acceptat s? î?i vând? copilul. Cât despre persoana care se presupune c? a f?cut tranzac?ia am în?eles c? va fi condamnat? în Germania. Noi am cerut s? ni se transmit? sentin?a ?i documenta?ia ?i nou? în România. Kastner a fost de acord cu propunerea noastr? de a trimite în Germania un psiholog vorbitor de limba german?, de la Direc?ia pentru Protec?ia Copilului Timi?, pentru a evalua situa?ia ?i pentru a plasa copilul într-o familie sigur?, undeva feti?a s? poat? vorbi în german?. Doamna Kastner nu a f?cut nici un fel de presiuni ?i a cerut s? se lucreze pe lege", ne-a declarat Constantin Ostaficiuc, pre?edintele CJ Timi?. ADOP?IE ILEGAL? Prefectul de Timi?, Mircea B?cal?, a avut ?i el o întrevedere cu vicepre?edintele Bundestag-ului, pe aceea?i tem?. "Doamna Kastner a spus ?i ea c? aceast? form? de adop?ie este ilegal?. A mai întrebat dac? plasamentul feti?ei se poate face la familia din Germania, îns? Rodica Negrea, directoarea Direc?iei de Protec?ie a Copilului, i-a explicat c? acest lucru este ilegal ?i c? plasamentul se poate face doar la o familie din România. Întâi copilul va fi luat la o familie de plasament din Germania, apoi va fi adus? la o familie de plasament din România, tot vorbitori de limba german?. Apoi, cu ajutorul unui psiholog, copilul va fi integrat încet, încet, în familia natural?", a declarat prefectul de Timi?, Mircea B?cal?.

.

PING-PONG CU VIA?A UNUI COPIL

Google translation: Ping-Pong with a child's life Girl held in Germany, nobody's child Nicoleta Trif, whose daughter is held in a German family since three years, will not be brought back soon to her natural family in the village Giulvaz, Timis county. German authorities threw the cat in the yard of the Romanians and the Romanian authorities claim they can not bring the child back, because the German family refuses to repatriate. However, although the natural mother of the girl, Gabriela, was in Germany and has asked the little girl back even from Korina Biemuller-Meyer, a German citizen who illegally took the child to a farm in Germany since the age of 4 months. German and Romanian authorities have already promised in June that the child will be repatriated, but everything appears to be just a hoax to officials responsible for child's life. Five days after Jurnalul National reported this serious case of seizure of a Romanian child in a family of Bavaria, Susanne Kastner, vice president of German Federal Parliament, came on a private visit to Timisoara to document the fate of the girl... ===================================== PING-PONG CU VIA?A UNUI COPIL Feti?a sechestrat? în Germania, copilul nim?nui Mama adoptiv?, Korina Biemuller-Meyer, ?i feti?a românc? sechestrat? de ea Nicoleta Trif, feti?a sechestrat? la o familie din Germania de trei ani, nu va fi adus? prea curând înapoi la familia ei natural? din satul Giulv?z, jude?ul Timi?. Autorit??ile germane arunc? pisica în curtea celor române, iar autorit??ile române sus?in c? nu pot aduce copilul înapoi, pe motiv c? familia german? refuz? s? o repatrieze. de Mircea Opris 28/08/2009R?sfoie?te: 1 23938 vizite Imprim? E-mail Toate acestea, de?i mama natural? a feti?ei, Gabriela Gu??, a fost în Germania ?i ?i-a cerut feti?a înapoi chiar de la Korina Biemuller-Meyer, o cet??ean? german? care ?ine ilegal acest copil la o ferm? din Germania înc? de la vârsta de 4 luni. Autorit??ile germane ?i cele române au promis înc? din luna iunie c? feti?a va fi repatriat?, îns? totul se dovede?te a fi doar o p?c?leal? a demnitarilor responsabili pentru via?a minorei. La cinci zile dup? ce Jurnalul Na?ional a semnalat acest caz grav de sechestrare a unui copil român la o familie din Bavaria, Susanne Kastner, vicepre?edinte al Parlamentului federal german, a venit într-o vizit? privat? la Timi?oara pentru a se documenta despre soarta feti?ei. Astfel, la 5 iunie, atât vicepre?edinta Bundestagului, cât ?i pre?edintele CJ Timi?, Constantin Ostaficiuc, prefectul Mircea B?cal?, dar ?i directorul Direc?iei pentru Protec?ia Copilului Timi?, Rodica Negrea, au promis c? în cel mai scurt timp românii vor trimite un psiholog vorbitor de limba german? pentru a evalua copilul ?i pentru a-l readuce în România. De?i mama natural? î?i a?tepta copilul în iunie, Susanne Kastner a declarat c? ea s-a implicat personal pentru ca acest copil s? mai r?mân? o perioad? în Germania ?i s? nu fie adus imediat înapoi acas?, pentru a nu suferi un ?oc la adaptarea la condi?iile de acas?. La mai bine de dou? luni de atunci, lucrurile s-au schimbat radical, iar acum nici autorit??ile române ?i nici cele germane nu vor s? se implice rapid în repatrierea copilului, aruncând vina unii în ograda celorlal?i ?i închizând ochii la gravele înc?lc?ri ale legilor interna?ionale de protec?ie ?i drepturile copilului ?i de repatriere la cererea p?rin?ilor în ceea ce prive?te sechestrarea minorei Nicoleta Trif. NEM?II SE JUR? C? NU AU NICI O RESPONSABILITATE Autorit??ile bavareze din Bad Kissingen au fost luate prin surprindere de faptul c? reporterii Jurnalului Na?ional au revenit în Germania pentru l?muriri în acest caz. Aceasta dup? ce mai multe ziare germane au încercat s? vad? feti?a ?i s? ia leg?tura cu cea care o ?ine, Korina Biemuller-Meyer. Femeia refuz? îns? constant orice întrevedere cu presa ?i ?ine feti?a doar pe teritoriul fermei, proprietate privat? a familiei. Dup? mai multe bâlbâieli ?i telefoane între reprezentan?i ai Consiliului regional din Bad Kissingen ?i de la Protec?ia Copilului din aceea?i regiune, r?spunsul a fost unul incredibil. "Despre acest caz trebuie s? întreba?i la Consulatul român din München, pentru c? noi nu avem dreptul s? intervenim în acest caz ?i nici nu suntem implica?i în acest caz. Nici Departamentul de Protec?ie a Copilului din Bad Kissingen nu este implicat în acest caz, pentru c? nu este permis. Noi nu avem dreptul s? hot?râm nici dac? s? ?inem copilul în Germania. Doar Consulatul român din München", ne-a declarat telefonic dintr-un alt birou dr Anna Barbara Keck, consilier principal, prin vocea Gerhard Kauf, func?ionar în cadrul Consiliului Regional Bad Kissingen. Declara?ia este surprinz?toare, dup? ce mai mul?i func?ionari de la Departamentul de Protec?ie a Copilului din Bad Kissingen, în frunte cu Siegbert Goll, directorul de la Protec?ia Copilului, au cerut rela?ii în România, au depus m?rturie ?i au fost parte în controversatul proces privind posibila traficare a feti?ei din România în Germania.

.

Jurnal National: Romanian Orphans, ready for export to the EU - ADOPTION MAFIA WORKS THROUGH THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION

File attached

Romanian Orphans, ready for export to the EU European Commission and Romanian Office for Adoptions quietly force to reopen international adoptions - REPORTING FROM BRUSSELS - Romanian Office for Adoptions prepares since almost 3 months to modify law 273 of 2004, the law that stopped the trafficking of children from Romania to other countries, under the guise of international adoptions. ORA officials have not acted on their own, but with the support of interest groups in the U.S., Italy, France and other countries. By Mircea Opris 20/10/2009 These groups were used by a Directorate of the European Commission, which will hold a conference for the reopening of international adoptions from Romania, on 31 November and 1 December in Strasbourg. The European Commission requires changing of the law, imposed by itself as a condition of our entry in the EU. Jurnalul National was able to look into the corridors of these international operations, with the help of a source inside the European Commission, whose identity we will protect for understandable reasons. ROMANIANS WAITED FOR THE RESIGNATION OF THE GOVERNMENT The Romanian Office for Adoptions paved the way for amendments to the law prohibiting international adoptions since the summer, when they organised two conferences, both held in Timisoara. The first took place in early September and referred to the rights of the adopted child. Here were assembled all the directors of the child protection directorates in the country for a central database for the adoption process, data about the number of adoptable children and of adoptions in process. A second conference was also held in Timisoara, away from the eyes of the EU mission in Bucharest. In the period 27-30 September 2009, UNICEF Romania and the National Authority for Child Protection (ANPDC) organised the National Conference which opens the series of events dedicated to celebrating the 20th anniversary of the adoption of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Attending were representatives ANPDC, DGASPC sites, UN agencies in Romania and other government institutions and NGOs. Here, Romanian and international institutions, together with NGOs involved in adoptions have finalized, in order to promote later, by legislation the Integrated National Action Plan on Preventing and Combating Violence against children. Coordinators were Ileana Savu, Secretary of State at the ANPDC, and Edmond McLoughney, UNICEF Representative in Romania. With only one day before the predictable failure of the Boc 2 Government, ORA proposes, through a Memorandum sent to the Government, to reopen international adoptions. The document prepared by ORA shows that during the four years of implementation of Law 273/2004, concerning the legal status of adoption, it was found that there are some categories of children who are "hard to adopt" because the regulatory framework in force does not identify appropriate solutions with a permanent character. The initiators of the document state that such a measure should be taken, having regard to provide equal opportunities for all children separated from their natural families, who can not be reintegrated and can not be adopted in Romania. The role of "soldier of sacrifice" was for Secretary of State of the Romanian Office for Adoptions, Bogdan Panait, who said the reopening of international adoption will be done only in cooperation with accredited authorities of the respective States, in order to avoid corruption. He fails to convince why this memorandum was submitted to the government at a time when Romania has no government. "I submitted the memorandum Monday morning before the vote of the motion (the fall of the government - sic). I do not know what will happen to it. I am in a hurry, it's one thing we wanted to submit for political debate and decision, and I think that this Government could discuss this Memorandum, "said Bogdan Panait. Clearly, ORA took advantage of political turmoil in Bucharest to demand a change of the law, to negotiate it with the next government to be appointed. Approval of this Memorandum means practically the amendment of Law 273 on the rules of adoption. Some of negotiations with representatives of U.S. and EU countries, interested in adoptions from Romania could be possible to adopt the memorandum and adoption law. "When I came here, I had a discussion with the Prime Minister (Emil Boc - Sic). Of course, there were many complaints from families and international fury, but the discussion was to value and change the law. Sure, he was not clear if it was about international adoption. I have taken up this mission. The modification was made. The law is ready for 99 percent, in the coming weeks it will be subjected to public debate and will be posted on the website. But from the context in which we made the changes to the law, I have concluded - and because of international protocols - that we can go ahead with the idea and start procedures for international adoption. Sure, this is not a decision which I can make. And that’s why I made this Memorandum, a memorandum which is very neutral. It is up to the Government to decide to what extent it is the political moment, we have statistics, I mentioned the commitment of Romania in the field and the decision will be entirely to the government," said Bogdan Panait a few days ago. Interestingly, in early September, in an exclusive interview to Jurnalul National, the same Secretary of State said that "As long as I am the director of ORA, if the government will ask me to find a solution to the international adoptions, for the moment at least, such thing is excluded". Once more it will create the image that again we will trade, traffic and other dealings with children. In three or four years perhaps, but it is the responsibility the Romanian State must bear." Powered by internal and external pressure or not, Bogdan Panait had no patience for three or four years and urged the reopening of international adoptions as soon as possible. SLAP FROM THE GOVERNMENT Subtle movement to amend the Law 273, which became a mandatory condition of Romania’s accession to the EU, was dismantled by the Government that gave its last breath. On October 16, the Romanian Executive announced officially that it does not support the memorandum initiated by the Romanian Office for Adoptions, which proposes reopening the international adoptions. The Memorandum represents the point of view of the institution and is not endorsed by the Emil Boc Cabinet Emil, still in office. The Government had no discussion about this Memorandum and therefore has not taken any decision on this document. Prime Minister still in office, Emil Boc, believes that current legislation in the field of international adoptions is in accordance with international law and European standards. The same view was exposed by former PSD Foreign Minister, Cristian Diaconescu. ADOPTION MAFIA WORKS THROUGH THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION The European Commission and the Council of Europe have prepared the international conference "Challenges of the procedures for adoption in Europe", which originally was to be held on 26 and 27 November in Strasbourg. Beyond discussions of principle, the ultimate aim of the conference is to develop a joint recommendation that Romania should follow the Bulgarian model, which is to reopen international adoptions. Those of the European Commission and NGOs who oppose this idea immediately came into conflict with the organizers. The website announcing the conference and where one could register was suspended and amended several times, and those interested to participate could not register. Subsequently, only NGOs approved by the organizers were informed by e-mail, and not at the official site of the conference, that the dates had changed and the conference would be held between November 30 and December 1. The worst thing is that the team of the European Commission in charge of organising the conference is not legally allowed to do so. Specifically, the Directorate General for Justice, Freedom and Security of the European Commission, the unit E2 - Civil Justice, headed by the Finnish Salla Saastamoinen organises the conference. The coordinator of the organisational team is the Italian Patrizia De Luca, working in that directorate. According to the organigram of the European Commission, the Rights of the Child are part of the D1 of Directorate D of the European Commission, led by the Romanian Aurel Ciobanu-Dordea. Sources in the EC Directorate D told National Journal that this structure has no involvement in organising the conference in Strasbourg, although it is the only unit that has competence in children's rights in the European Commission. The same source says that Directorate E2 violates the official regulations of the EU, more precisely the European Union anti-corruption policy, which states that a Directorate can not organise actions on issues that do not fall within their powers, conform the Communication on Anti-Corruption Policy, number 317 of 2003, addressed to the European Council and the European Parliament. HOW TO SUBSTITUTE THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION The organisational team E2 of the Directorate of Justice has hired a private firm that bought an Internet domain, www.adoptionprocedure.net, announcing the upcoming conference. Normally, the conference should have been officially announced on the Internet pages of the European Commission and the Council of Europe. Subsequently, the team only had contact with organisations and NGOs who are in favour of reopening international adoptions and ignore all others and international media interested in this subject. Many last-minute changes were only announced on the website of the conference at the last minute, or not announced at all. Jurnalul National managed exclusively to unveil the secrecy around this so important conference, even at the European Commission in Brussels, from a source working in the Directorate of Justice caught offside, ie unit E2. This source claims that postponing the conference has nothing to do with the submission of the Government memorandum of ORA in Bucharest, but that the new government which will be installed until the conference, November 30, could give a favourable opinion of the proposed change of Romanian Office for Adoptions. To the conference no nongovernmental organization from Romania or from another country that is hostile to reopen international adoptions was invited, the ultimate goal of the meeting in Strasbourg. "We invited to the conference those organizations that have a closer connection (they coincide with those that oversaw international adoptions in Romania until 2004 and continued lobbying for the reopening them – Sic.) and we can not invite everyone who registered or the press because the conference hall has only 150 seats. The website does not work all the time, because it is under construction, because the conference agenda and guest list is not yet complete. From Romania only three guests will participate from State institutions. One of them, Bogdan Panait, director of ORA. I do not remember the name of the other two. We pay to participate, just travel and accommodation, for participants approved by us, with whom we worked, a total of 10 NGOs. Among them the Nordic Adoption, an umbrella association of 15 adoption agencies, very important in northern Europe and other organizations from France, and SERA, SERA whose leadership has moved to Geneva, International Social Service, and Amici dei Bambini in Italy. So, from Romania will come only three guests from the State and Edmond McLoughney, UNICEF representative in Romania, who will speak on behalf of Romania, told us the source of the European Commission. Interestingly, the last topic of the conference will be "Towards a European policy on adoption ", where the case and experiences of Romania and Bulgaria will be analysed, and Frenchman Jean-Marie Cavada, Member of the European Parliament and a close associate of French pro-adoption lobby in Romania, will talk about a common adoption policy, because other countries have opened adoptions, only Romania has not done this, though is part of the European Union. We will have a Hungarian adoptive parent who lives in Britain, who will speak about the problems he had when he adopted a child in Hungary. This conference is a sequel, a follow-up to the conference in 2006, when it was tried also to make Romania to understand how necessary it is to reopen international adoptions, as well as other EU countries. We will not solve the problem immediately, but the conference has to convince Romania that international adoption can be resumed, like in other EU countries, such as for example Bulgaria, which has responded positively to this request for international adoptions. The fact that Romania has a law against international adoption is the fault of former European rapporteur for Romania, Baroness Emma Nicholson, who said that international adoption means trafficking in children. She used his influence to halt all adoptions and make the entry of Romania into the EU to stop adoptions. Now we try to convince Romania to re-open adoptions, like other countries in Europe,” our source in Brussels told us.

.

Rumänisches Pflegekind: Kastner sieht keine Chance, die Rückführung zu verhindern

LKR. BAD KISSINGEN

Rumänisches Pflegekind: Kastner sieht keine Chance, die Rückführung zu verhindern

Fall spitzt sich zu
„Ich halte die ganze Geschichte für sehr schlimm.“ Susanne Kastner, Vizepräsidentin des Deutschen Bundestages, sieht keine Möglichkeit, die Rückführung eines im Landkreis Bad Kissingen lebenden rumänischen Pflegekindes in sein Geburtsland zu verhindern. Wie Kastner auf Anfrage der Main-Post bestätigte, habe sie sich Anfang Juni persönlich und vor Ort bei der Kinderschutzkommission in Temesvar für das Verbleiben des Mädchens in Deutschland eingesetzt.

Das Schicksal des knapp dreijährigen Mädchens beschäftigt seit Monaten deutsche und rumänische Behörden. Im Dezember 2006 war das Kind durch die Vermittlung einer Deutsch-Rumänin auf rechtlich höchst umstrittenem Weg zu einer Pflegefamilie in den Landkreis Bad Kissingen gekommen. Diese wollte das Kind nach einer Pflegefrist adoptieren, was aber nach rumänischer Gesetzeslage nicht möglich ist. „Nach Auskunft der rumänischen Behörden will die leibliche Mutter jetzt, dass das Kind zurückkommt“, so Kastner.



Bereits am 2. Juni hätte das Kind nach Rumänien zurückgeführt werden sollen, sagte Kastner. „Bei unseren Gesprächen wurde mir dann aber noch einmal ein Aufschub zugesagt.“ Einen dauerhaften Pflegestatus des Kindes in Deutschland lehnten die rumänischen Behörden aber kategorisch ab, so Kastner. Dies werde neben dem Wunsch der leiblichen Mutter auch mit der eindeutigen rechtlichen Lage in dem EU–Land begründet.

 

Kastners Informationen nach gibt es Pläne, „das Kind mit einem Konsulatsmitarbeiter und einer Deutsch sprechenden Psychologin abzuholen und einer Deutsch sprechenden Pflegefamilie in Rumänien zuzuführen“. Sollte es dazu kommen, „werde ich persönlich immer wieder die Lebensumstände des Mädchens erfragen“, versicherte Kastner im Telefonat mit dieser Zeitung.

Wie berichtet, kam das Kind als Baby nach Deutschland. An seine leiblichen Eltern erinnert es sich nicht und es spricht auch kein Wort Rumänisch. Das Mädchen stammt aus ärmlichen Verhältnissen und war zum Zeitpunkt der Vermittlung das jüngste von neun Kindern.

Es ist nach Auffassung der deutschen Behörden vorbildlich in seine Pflegefamilie integriert. Eine Rechtsanwältin aus Fulda, die die Pflegefamilie juristisch vertritt, ist vor diesem Hintergrund überzeugt, „dass das Kind schwere psychische Schäden erleiden wird, wenn es aus dieser Familie herausgeholt wird“.

 

„Der leibliche Vater hat das Baby damals ja mit nach Deutschland begleitet und war sogar noch einige Tage bei uns zu Gast.“

Die deutsche Pflegemutter des Mädchens

Eine Rückführungsmaßnahme könne nach Ansicht der Juristin „wenn überhaupt, nur dann erfolgreich sein, wenn die Pflegefamilie intensiv involviert wird“. Die Pflegemutter hatte sich wiederholt auch gegenüber dieser Zeitung beklagt, dass die rumänischen Behörden keinerlei persönlichen Kontakt mit ihr aufnähmen.

Kastner äußerte die Befürchtung, dass ein Artikel des rumänischen Journalisten Mircea Opris, der für die in Bukarest erscheinende große Tageszeitung Jurnalul National im Landkreis Bad Kissingen und in der Pflegefamilie recherchierte, die Situation zugespitzt haben könnte. „Die Behörden sind jetzt hellwach in dieser Sache.“

Bei der Pflegemutter wachsen Verzweiflung und Fassungslosigkeit. „Der Journalist hat doch persönlich gesehen, wie gut es dem Mädchen hier geht.“ Sie habe auch die leiblichen Eltern durch Fotos und Briefe immer wieder über das Mädchen informiert. „Der leibliche Vater hat das Baby damals ja mit nach Deutschland begleitet und war sogar noch einige Tage bei uns zu Gast“, berichtet die Pflegemutter.

„Der Staat Rumänien hat vor der Verschärfung seines Adoptionsgesetzes enorm schlechte Erfahrung mit Kinderhandel gemacht“, gibt Bundestagsvizepräsidentin Susanne Kastner zu bedenken. Dies sei sicher ein Grund für die strikt harte Haltung der Behörden in diesem Fall, vermutet die Politikerin, die sich regelmäßig humanitär in dem EU–Land engagier

EC false report first international reactions

EC false report first international reactions

Dutch politicians ask for investigation on European Commission’s abuse of power

Autor: MIRCEA OPRIS 6 decembrie 2010

Twitter Facebook Email Imprim?

A member from the Socialist Party of the Dutch Parliament and a member of the European Parliament want an investigation, after Jurnalul National revealed a fake report issued by the European Commission on adoption and children’s rights. The Dutch Member of Parliament also send in Questions to the Dutch Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs & Justice in Holland.

Jurnalul National: Battle of international adoptions reaches peak

3 decembrie 2010

Battle of international adoptions reaches peak

Autor: MIRCEA OPRIS

 

The European Commission has falsified an official report, released only partially exactly one year ago, during the Conference on Challenges in Adoption Procedures in Europe, in Strasbourg from 30 November to 1 December 2009.  Exclusively for Jurnalul National several experts testified about the pressure put on their work by high-rank European Commission officials, in order to get to the conclusion that there is a need for the establishment of a European Adoption Agency. The stake of the new agency: creating a "market" for European adoptions in which Romania would be forced to reopen international adoptions. Behind this decision are pro-adoption lobbies from France, Italy, Spain and the United States.

On December 1, in Strasbourg - France, the European Commission and the Council of Europe organized a conference on adoptions. Originally it was to take place behind closed doors, but it became public after Jurnalul National revealed the backstage games behind it and the attempt to invite only the adoption lobby, through the mediation of the Italian EC official Patrizia De Luca. Surprisingly, at the end of the conference the conclusion of a report were presented, which recommended the need for establishing a European Adoption Agency. The long awaited report did not become public and was kept secret at the conference in Strasbourg. It was not made public until spring 2010, after pressure from several non-governmental organizations. Even so, the details of the report were never made public. One of the aims of the report, which needed the consent and approval of all Member States of the EU, was to reopen international adoptions at European level and thus forcing Romania to repeal the law 274, which forbids the adoption of Romanian children by foreigners.

One year after the scandal of this conference, Jurnalul National has been able to reveal what is hidden behind the report but, much worse, to also reveal pressure from the European Commission on the Belgian law firm, which drafted the report, in order to falsify data. The study has cost 250,000 euros, European public money, and consisted of interviews with more than 500 experts, lawyers, social workers, adoptive parents and adopted children. The study focused on the state of play of adoptions in the 27 EU member states. The final conclusion of the report was that clearly there was an urgent need to establish the European Agency for Adoption.

In reality, however, this conclusion proved to be a factual lie, for which officials of the European Commission signed, under the pressure of lobby groups in several Western countries with direct interest in the reopening of international adoptions from Romania. The study and the report were prepared by the law firm DBB - Demolin - Brulard – Barthelemy in Brussels, an associate of the French law firm PDGB.

Here is the stupefying testimony of one of the experts who prepared the country studies and the European Commission's report. "We were asked to conduct a study and a report identifying the needs of children, social services, the needs of the adopters and solutions for each country in order to improve the adoption and care system. We developed a questionnaire for each EU country. Then we interviewed over 500 subjects. Most of them answered they want better social protection, support for adopted children, post adoption assistance for adoptive parents after adoption, and some country-specific problems. There was only one question on whether it is necessary to establish a European Agency for adoptions. Only a few lawyers, out of the 500 subjects considered the new agency as necessary. Finally, we presented the conclusions and the report to the European Commission. When they saw the results they went mad at us and refused to acknowledge the study and its recommendations. They said the study would only be accepted if we would follow their main recommendation of setting up a European Agency for Adoption. Or, in reality, only a few had said such an agency would be good. Our firm’s prestige was at stake. We have been forced in the end to accept this conclusion, although it is not the reality. However they added whatever they wanted. We have been put in a situation with no alternative, because our company has several contracts with the European Commission and other European institutions. We could also risk losing these as customers. If we did not do it, they would have gone to another company and get the result they were looking for. "If you don’t make the recommendation about the new agency, you do not get your money” - this was the message of the European Commission ", Jurnalul National was told, on condition of anonymity, by one of the experts directly involved in the realization of the research and the report.

Lying was necessary for the lobby groups and adoption agencies in order to establish the "adoption market." "European States would have a limit, for example of two years, in which the children can stay in care, after which they would become adoptable. First in their country, and after a period of time they get on the European list. If not adopted this second time, then the children are put on the international adoption list. Such a system would take away the responsibility of the Member States to provide care for children temporarily or permanently deprived of parental care (UN Convention Rights of the Child). A European Adoption Agency – as EU institution staffed by EU civil servants – would take all responsibility away from national Member states and would create a full fledged free market. Adoption agencies from all over the world would be competing to get the children. Member States will have less incentives to create appropriate care for children, or to place children back into their own families, invoking that having the children adopted will save a lot of money on child protection and social protection costs. It is important to realize that children in care, foster and residential, have families and mostly are in contact with them. Adoption changes identity and cuts permanently all family ties”, said European official Roelie Post, seconded to the NGO Against Child Trafficking. She says the number of children legally adopted internationally has declined. Since Romania's accession to EU, the number of children available for adoption decreased worldwide from 40,000 to 20,000 per year. A future European Adoptions Agency will also have the problem of legality, because the EU has no legal powers on the issue of international adoptions, which are directly regulated by protocols between the Member States, and work under national competence.

Roelie Post followed this phenomenon and she believes that the report was meant to be used in the EU Strategy on the Rights of the Child. Without success so far, the EU strategy on children's rights, announced since 2006, but not yet finalized. The initiative was called "the Frattini strategy”, then Vice President of the European Commission, and who concretized the fake report of the EC in 2010. Roelie Post wrote a book about the export of Romanian ‘orphans’ until the introduction of Law 273 and 274 of 2004 that stopped the business with adoptions from Romania. The book and more information can be found at:
http://www.roeliepost.eu/buy-the-book/ 


 

"Leaganul" pus sa creasca spioni

"Leaganul" pus sa creasca spioni

email print

0

Autor: prof. dr. Liviu Turcu 15 Mai 2004 - 00:00

De mai bine de 25 de ani, da, repet, de peste 25 de ani guvernantii Romaniei, fie ei din era Ceausescu fie post-Ceausescu, se confrunta in relatiile internationale cu o problema care afecteaza direct interesele si imaginea publica a statului roman: problema copiilor institutionalizati.

APOM investigation into human trafficking network, confirmed

APOM investigation into human trafficking network, confirmed

August 1, 2019- by admin - Leave a Comment

Deva, Thursday, August 1, 2019

Author: Mircea Dan Opri?

On the night of July 27/28, 2019, that is Saturday on Sunday, while all the attention was directed to the event in Caracal, the Association for the Protection of the Human and the Environment, signalled a descent of a mixed team from three special structures in Bucharest, who, without the news of the press and without the knowledge of the policemen from Arad county, started investigations at a farm in the town of Chilindia, Arad county. Here, complex researches were conducted, as well as searches / searches, sample collections and security interviews with several persons. Chilindia is 50 kilometres from the border town Curtici, 80 kilometres’ from Turnu and 75 kilometres from V?r?and, all three being border crossing points between Romania and Hungary.