Home  

Seoul found responsible for abuse of adoptions process

A South Korean official enquiry said on Wednesday the government was responsible for abuse in international adoptions of local children, including record fabrication and inadequate consent, and recommended an official state apology.

"It was determined that the state neglected its duty ... resulting in the violation of the human rights of adoptees protected by the constitution and international agreements during the process of sending a lot of children abroad," South Korea's Truth and Reconciliation Commission said.

The country remains one of the biggest ever exporters of babies in the world, having sent more than 140,000 children overseas between 1955 and 1999.

International adoptions began after the Korean War as a way to remove mixed-race children, born to local mothers and American GI fathers, from a country that emphasised ethnic homogeneity.

It became big business in the 1970s to 1980s, bringing international adoption agencies millions of dollars as the country overcame post-war poverty and faced rapid and aggressive economic development.

More recently, the main driver has been babies born to unmarried women, who still face ostracism in a patriarchal society, and according to academics, are often forced to give up their children.

In a landmark announcement, the country's truth commission concluded after a two-year and seven-month investigation that human rights violations occurred in international adoptions of South Korean children, including "fraudulent orphan registrations, identity tampering, and inadequate vetting of adoptive parents."

It also said "numerous cases were identified where proper legal consent procedures" for South Korean birth parents were "not followed."

The commission also said Seoul failed to regulate adoption fees, allowing agencies to set them through "internal agreements," effectively turning it into a profit-driven industry.

And despite regulations requiring verification of adoptive parents' eligibility, an overwhelming majority, 99 percent, of intercountry adoption approvals in 1984 alone were granted on the same day or the following day, the commission said, citing its investigation.

"These violations should never have occurred," the commission's chairperson Park Sun-young said.

"This is a shameful part of our history," she added.

For years, Korean adoptees have advocated for their rights, many reporting that their birth mothers were forced to give up their children, leading to the fabrication of records to make them legally adoptable.

Some South Korean birth parents and adoptees even claimed that their children were kidnapped – by agents who sought out unattended children in poor neighbourhoods – or that authorities directed lost children towards adoption without trying to reunite them with their families, in some cases intentionally changing the child's identity.

Some adoptees – such as Adam Crapser – were deported to South Korea as adults because their American parents never secured their US citizenship.

The commission confirmed human rights violations in only 56 out of 367 complaints, saying there was an overwhelming amount of data to try to verify, and said it would "make efforts" to review the remaining cases before its investigation expires on May 26.

Some adoptees were dissatisfied with this outcome, urging the commission to fully recognise violations in all 367 cases.

"Without the truth, our lives rests upon guesses, estimations and creative narratives," Boonyoung Han, a Danish Korean adoptee, said.

"We are victims to state violence but without a trace! Literally. Destruction and withholding of our documents must not leave us open to eternal uncertainty."

Hanna Johansson, a Korean adoptee in Sweden, said she considers the commission's announcement a "victory" for her adoptee community regardless.

"I also hope that more and more South Korean [birth] parents who lost their child without their consent will come forward and demand justice," she said. (AFP)

293 couples on waiting list for adopting children from Goa

Panaji: A couple from Goa who recently adopted a child told TOI that although the wait was three and a half years long, the patience was worth it.
 

Five children in Goa are waiting to be adopted.
 

As for the couple who waited for three-plus years, a child was made available to them for adoption after they registered online on the CARINGS portal of the Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA). “We did a lot of research and spoke to friends who had adopted earlier, so we were aware of the long waiting period,” the couple said. “Although we were mentally prepared, we got impatient after three years. Every day was very trying.”
 

The couple added that they had no issues as far as the process is concerned, as it’s a neat procedure. “The waiting period is the only concern, and we hope that it decreases in the future,” they said. However, the couple said they received a lot of negative reactions when they decided to adopt, spurred by the stigma that some attach to adoption.

“Many couples choose to remain childless, fearing what society will say. They have reservations about the background of the child and the genes, which is very strange,” the couple said.

Parents who register on the CARINGS portal can choose up to three states from which to adopt a child. It is a rarity for parents from Goa to get a child from the state — given its size, it has fewer children on the adoption list.
 

Swedish couple adopts orphan boy in Bihar's Begusarai

BEGUSARAI: Two-year-old Dharmraj, who was an inmate of a specialized adoption agency at Begusarai till Friday, would soon have a new address in Halmstad, a city in South Sweden. Swedish couple Sanjay Daniel and Chitra Sanjay Daniel adopted Dharmraj after completing all the formalities of adoption at DM's office here on Saturday.
 

Begusarai DM Roshan Kushwaha said Dharmraj's adoption has been channelled through the Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA), a statutory body of ministry of women and child development.
 

"His adoption by the Swedish couple was cleared after completion of all the due processes on Saturday. The adoption policy is now a bit flexible after certain amendments. The desiring couples or any individual may now go for the process online through CARA. I hope the child under his new parents would have a bright future," he said.

Sanjay, who is of Indian origin, told TOI that his parents had also adopted him. "My parents, who are Swedish, adopted me from an orphanage in Mumbai in 1984," he said. His wife Chitra however, is of Swedish origin. She seemed to be enjoying her visit at Begusarai as a large crowd gathered curiously outside the DM's office on Saturday afternoon to see them with the child.Sanjay works as a business developer while Chitra works as a librarian in a local school in Halmstad. The couple would stay here till Wednesday and then proceed to New Delhi for completing Dharmraj's immigration procedure.

Coordinator of the Begusarai-based specialised adoption agency, Ritu Singh said, "Dharmraj is enjoying shopping with his new parents. He was brought here from the child welfare centre at Lakhisarai," she said.
 

Jitender Girdhar and others share their thoughts on LinkedIn

View Jitender Girdhar’s  graphic link

Jitender GirdharJitender Girdhar • 3rd+Influencer • 3rd+Leadership & Influence Coach | 3 TEDx Talks | Bestselling Author | Entrepreneur | Columnist | Helping Companies Build High-Trust, People-First Workplaces| #1 Creator in Workplace Wellbeing |Leadership & Influence Coach | 3 TEDx Talks | Bestselling Author | Entrepreneur | Columnist | Helping Companies Build High-Trust, People-First Workplaces| #1 Creator in Workplace Wellbeing |1w • 1 week ago • Visible to anyone on or off LinkedIn

Follow

 

Micromanagement is the fastest way to lose good people.

If you don’t trust your team, why hire them at all?

Is your boss always watching?
Do they need updates every hour?
Are they more focused on control than results?

If yes, you might be dealing with a micromanager.

The bad news? 
It kills trust and motivation.

The good news? 
You can handle it. 

❌ 9 Signs of a Micromanager:
1. They Struggle With Trust
2. They Struggle to Delegate
3. They Hover Over Your Work
4. They Need Constant Updates
5. They React Poorly to Initiative
6. They Obsess Over Small Details
7. They Focus on Blame Over Solutions
8. They Give Overly Detailed Instructions
9. They Demand Approval for Everything

A great boss trusts and empowers. 
A micromanager controls and suffocates. 

If these sound familiar, you might be dealing with one.

📍How to Handle It: 
✔️ Deliver quality work to build trust.
✔️ Understand why they micromanage.
✔️ Keep them updated before they ask.
✔️ Show results instead of explaining every step.
✔️ Have open conversations about working styles.
✔️ Frame independence as a way to improve efficiency.
✔️ Suggest structured check-ins to reduce interruptions.
✔️ If nothing improves, consider escalating or moving on.

Break free from micromanagement,
Own your work, build trust, and set boundaries.

Ever dealt with a micromanager? Share your experience below.

♻️ Repost to help others deal with micromanagement
➕ Follow Jitender Girdhar for more

Adopted by Swedish couple 30 years ago, woman meets her biological mother for first time

From 1974 to May 2019, the Shreevatsa child care centre has sent as many as 3,209 children for adoption. Of them 2,478 were sent for adoption to Indian couples, while 731 were sent for adoption to couples abroad, Sayed said.

It was a medley of nervousness and excitement at Pune’s Shreevatsa Child Care Centre on Monday as Vibha Sofie Medin met her biological mother for the first time. Raised by a Swedish couple after she was adopted 30 years ago, Vibha had never expected to meet her biological mother until she started facing medical complications while she was expecting her fourth child.

For the first few moments, Vibha stood in silence, allowing the reality of meeting her biological mother (who preferred anonymity) to sink in. Pointing out the similarities in their appearances, it was her biological mother who spoke first: “Can I touch her? Can I give her a hug?”

While neither of them speaks a common language, the feeling of not being able to express themselves slowly faded away. Her biological mother watched in awe, as Jonas Olsson, Vibha’s husband, showed her pictures of their house back in Sweden.

Vibha works as a nurse at an old-age home and Jonas works as a business manager. They have been living together for 10 years and have been married for five. The couple has four children – Liam (9), Leo (7), Hedwig (3) and seven-month-old Helge.

Abandoned baby adopted by Swedish nurse

JAIPUR: Kajri, an eight-month-old baby girl, who was abandoned and left to die on a railway track, has finally found a mother, who has travelled all the way from Sweden to adopt her.
 

The cheerful girl today is a very different picture from the infant that was found by a lineman on the railway tracks near Barmer in a carton last year. The railway police got the infant admitted to a hospital, where it was confirmed that the baby was hardly a day-old and was premature. The girl child was sent to Nav Jeevan Sansthan in Jodhpur

where she was named Kajri and has now been adopted by a Swedish nurse

Elin Kristin Eriksson, who saw the girl on the Sansthan’s portal for adoption.

After waiting and completing the adoption formalities the single mother is ready to take her daughter back home. This is the first time that a special child has been adopted by a foreign national from Nav Jeevan Sansthan which is home for 50 children.

Rajendra Parihaar who is heading Nav Jeevan Sansthan told TOI, “Ministry of Women and Child Development has a statutory body Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA), which looks into the adoption procedure and policy and Ericksson had applied for adoption in Sweden following which her request was sent to CARA. From application to now the process takes more than 6 months and she will be taking Kajri with her on July 27.”

The Paradoxical Development of Liberal Governance: International Adoption Policy and Professional Social Work in Authoritarian South Korea, 1953–1976

Abstract

This article explores the development of international adoption policy in post-liberation South Korea, emphasizing the roles of American and Korean professional social workers. By analyzing the orphan registry and a pivotal international adoption law, it reveals how international adoption in South Korea presents a unique opportunity to observe the formation of modern social policy in a newly liberated nation during the Cold War. The study argues that adoption policy served as a crucial locus of transnational governance, where American and Korean social workers pursued their liberal ideals of professional social work within the context of the authoritarian policies of the South Korean state. However, their quest for scientific professionalism, standardized procedures, and public oversight led to a paradoxical evolution of adoption policy, diverging sharply from the trajectory seen in Western liberal democracies where social work significantly contributed to the consolidation and expansion of the welfare state. In South Korea, embedded transnationality and ideological mismatch resulted in the state’s further withdrawal and the creation of policy workarounds that undermined the core social work principle of the child’s best interests. This case highlights the complexities and blurred moral boundaries in the shaping of modern governance and the broader journey toward modernity under postcolonial, Cold War conditions.

Issue Section:Article

“Everything began with the registry when a child was taken in for international adoption,” recounted Kim Kwang-su, a retired social worker in his eighties, as we sat in a café in central Seoul in 2017.1 He shared his experiences of handling adoption paperwork in 1970s South Korea, after I inquired about the typical adoption procedures of that time.2 In South Korea, the family registry (hojŏk) served as the foundational document for identification and citizenship until its abolition in 2008.3 This system, however, was not originally developed by Koreans. At the turn of the twentieth century, amidst imperial competition and expansion, the Korean peninsula fell under Japanese colonial rule, and the Japanese introduced the family registry system in 1909 in an early effort to make the Korean population legible to the colonial state. Unlike birth certificates or other typical forms of identity in Western societies that assign legal status to individuals, the family registry system conferred this status on the family as a unit. In particular, emphasizing the patrilineal principle, it required all individuals to be registered under the name of the family’s male head either as his spouse or child. Through their inclusion in this patrilineal system, individuals obtained official identification. When Korea was liberated in 1945 and two separate governments were subsequently established in the North and South during the intensifying Cold War divide, the South Korean government chose to retain the official role of the family registry.4

For children placed in overseas adoptions, however, a special variant known as the “orphan registry (koa hojŏk)” was used.5 Unlike the family registry where a child is listed under the father’s household, the orphan registry designated the child as the head of a single-person household, leaving blank all familial information such as details about the parents (see Figure 1). Social worker Kim elaborated that this registry was one of the first documents used to facilitate international adoption. Containing minimal information about the child, usually just an assumed date of birth and a name assigned by social workers, and seen as inconsequential, necessary paperwork, this document has long been overlooked outside the adoption profession.

New agreement on a joint effort in the area of ​​adoption

A number of initiatives in the field of adoption aim to strengthen our knowledge of the past, provide increased support for adult adoptees, and analyze the possibilities for international adoption in the future.

Since the 1960s, children have come to Denmark through international adoption mediation. A number of reports and stories in the media have cast doubt on the basis for international adoption mediation back in time. Since then, much has changed in both Denmark and in many of the countries that have given up children. In 1997, the Hague Adoption Convention came into force in Denmark, and most recently in 2016, the Danish system for international adoption was fundamentally changed with stricter supervision. In recent years, however, it has proven difficult to implement adoption mediation under the current requirements, and there is currently no permanent solution for international adoption mediation to Denmark.

Therefore, the government, the Socialist People's Party and the Conservative People's Party have agreed on a number of important initiatives in the area of ​​adoption, which together will contribute to more knowledge about the past, provide increased support for adult adoptees and also shed light on future options for adoption. The starting point for the agreement is consideration for the best interests of the child, regardless of age.

There is agreement on the following: 

1: An impartial study of adoption mediation to Denmark from all partner countries

Minister Alejandro Aguilar issues first indictment for child abduction case and requests extradition of defendant from Israel

Justice Aguilar Brevis indicted Ivonne Gutiérrez Pávez, Ismael Moisés Espinoza León, Carlos Sigisfredo Vega Segura, Laura Rosa Silva Sánchez, and Sylvia Clara Vilches Rojas for the crimes of criminal association, child abduction, and willful misconduct. A request was made for the first defendant's extradition to Israel.


The visiting judge of the Santiago Court of Appeals, Alejandro Aguilar Brevis, issued the first indictment for child abductions between the 1970s and 1990s, and the Supreme Court sent an extradition request from Israel for one of the defendants.

The judge prosecuted and ordered the pretrial detention of five people for criminal association, child abduction, and willful misconduct in the illegal adoption of two minors from the commune of San Fernando, who were given to foreign couples.

Minister Aguilar Brevis indicted Ivonne Gutiérrez Pávez, Ismael Moisés Espinoza León, Carlos Sigisfredo Vega Segura, Laura Rosa Silva Sánchez, and Sylvia Clara Vilches Rojas for the crime of criminal association.

In addition, Ivonne Gutiérrez Pávez was charged with two counts of child abduction. Ismael Espinoza León, Carlos Vega Segura, and Laura Silva Sánchez were also charged with child abduction.

Adoption to Denmark must be investigated

The government, the Socialist Party and the Conservatives have agreed that both a historical review and an analysis of the future of adoption should be carried out.

 


The framework for a long-awaited impartial investigation of international adoptions to Denmark has now been put in place.

It will be a historical investigation of adoptions to Denmark from 70 countries in the period 1964-2016, where, among other things, the practices of the authorities will be examined.

This is stated in a political agreement reached on Wednesday between the government and the SF and the Conservatives.