Register Log in

Ruling that illegal adoption cannot be validated under any circumstances, the Telangana High Court has dismissed a writ petition seeking the return of a two-year-old girl to a couple who had adopted the child without following due legal adoption procedures.

Justice T Madhavi Devi’s judgment of January 28, while acknowledging the couple’s claim that the child was being well taken care of and has already developed a bond with them in the last two years, held that bypassing official procedures to allow an “out-of-turn” adoption of the child as pleaded would “amount to and lead to a prescription for illegal adoptions…and encourage child trafficking in the country.”

The petitioner, Muthineni Venakanna, and wife, unable to have biological children, tried for legal adoption, but their application has been pending for several years. Meanwhile, in May 2023, they came to know of a one-month-old girl available for adoption through an intermediary named Nakka Yadagiri. The couple adopted the girl as their own, although illegally, and had been taking good care of her since then.

The petitioner contended that Nakka Yadagiri was booked on charges of child trafficking, and the child in the petitioner’s custody was detained in June 2025 and forcibly taken away by authorities without any notice and lodged in a children’s home in Nalgonda town. The names of the petitioner and his wife have also been added as accused in the FIR. They argued that the child was suffering severe mental agony after being separated from them, and pleaded with the court to return the child to them for adoption legally.

The Government Pleader for Women Development and Child Welfare submitted that Yadagiri was involved in child trafficking and was involved in the sale of several children. She further submitted that there were established procedures through the Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA) for legal adoption and that the petitioner, having applied, should wait for their turn.

Washington — Hundreds of American families and the children they're in the process of adopting from abroad are in a wait-and-see mode after President Trump's latest travel ban and visa freeze covering dozens of countries — unlike past travel bans — made no blanket exceptions for international adoption visas, advocacy groups and bipartisan lawmakers say.

The State Department circulated new guidance Wednesday saying children being adopted by U.S. citizens may qualify for an exception under the National Interest Exception on a "case-by-case" basis. The department "will consider such requests on a priority basis," according to guidance obtained by CBS News.

The new guidance, adoption groups and families say, is a step in the right direction, but they're also asking for adoptions to be exempt automatically. 

"Intercountry adoption remains a high priority for the administration, and adoption-related visas will continue to be processed as expeditiously as possible," the not-yet-released State Department guidance reads. "Additionally, because overall visa volumes have decreased following the [visa freeze], many consular offices now have increased capacity to assist with adoption cases."

Still, members of Congress from both parties who sit on the Congressional Coalition on Adoption Caucus and adoption nonprofit groups are urging the administration to make categorical exemptions for adoptions, rather than case-by-case allowances. 

Anantapur: An embarrassing situation arose at the Government General Hospital (GGH) and the Two Town police in Anantapur on Wednesday after rumours spread about a newborn baby going missing, only for police to later find that the infant had been unofficially given away by the family.

According to sources, Shiva Lakshmi and her husband Sunil of Kakkalapalli in Anantapur rural mandal already have three children. Lakshmi delivered her fourth child, a baby girl, at GGH on January 24, and both mother and child were admitted to the general labour ward.

On Wednesday, reports circulated that the four-day-old baby had gone missing from the ward, prompting hospital authorities to alert the Two Town police. Police launched a search, alerting Anantapur headquarters and nearby police stations.

During the investigation, police noticed inconsistencies in the statements of the parents. There were also rumours that the baby had been taken away by relatives, including the grandmother, due to family differences.

 

Origional Text[ Sinds 2023 maakten 241 mensen melding van mogelijke onregelmatigheden bij het Vlaams centrum voor adoptie. Na twee jaar gaan in 2026 de onderzoeken daarnaar van start. Betrokkenen zijn kritisch voor de werkwijze van de overheid: ‘Wij worden nauwelijks op de hoogte gehouden.’

Dit artikel is geschreven doorSimon Tibo

is journalist bij De Morgen

Gepubliceerd op 7 januari 2026, 03:00

Bewaren

Singapore is aware of the allegations concerning babies being trafficked from Indonesia into the country for adoption and the government is working closely with Indonesian authorities to review the matter.

 

The Singapore government is working closely with Indonesian authorities to review allegations concerning babies being trafficked from Indonesia for adoption. (File photo: iStock)

 

Darcel Al Anthony

Backed by 120 co-signatories from MPs and uninterrupted lobbying of the government, the bill introduced by MP Karine Lebon was adopted this Tuesday afternoon, January 20, 2026, in the Social Affairs Committee (Photo: sly/www.imazpress.com)

"This is a major first step towards the recognition and financial compensation of survivors and their families. The adoption of the text will have to be confirmed next week in the National Assembly chamber," the MP emphasizes. 

Following numerous hearings involving former miners who were relocated, historians, experts, institutions and political figures, the initial text was able to evolve favorably towards a draft of "compromise, without giving up the essentials: truth, dignity, rights".

"The hard work of the survivors and associations has finally paid off. An immense joy, commensurate with the decades of silence. Because these children, torn from Reunion Island and then sent to mainland France, suffered uprooting, the breaking of family ties, brutal placements, sometimes mistreatment, exploitation, humiliation and stigmatization. Many grew up far from their bearings and still bear the social, psychological and family consequences of this policy today," the elected official recalls.

"This adoption in committee is proof that perseverance can move the Republic forward. We are not erasing the wounds, but we are finally opening a path to justice and reparation," says Karine Lebon.

 

Criticizing Bufdir for stopping adoptions – important not to overreact

Of

Victoria Asne Kinsella

-

At a rally for the victims of forced adoptions in East Germany, a man holds up a poster with the inscription "Where are our children?" in front of the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin on April 18, 2014.

 

According to a new study, many child removals in East Germany were carried out with disproportionate harshness and were part of the systemic injustice. However, a systematically politically controlled approach or targeted involvement of the Stasi could not be proven. Ideology strongly influenced the actions of the youth welfare services. Those affected continue to suffer the consequences to this day.

from MDR AKTUELL

A new study by the German Institute for Residential Care Research shows that many adoptions in East Germany were carried out with "excessive and disproportionate harshness." Of approximately 95,000 adoptions between 1945 and 1990, about eleven percent were attributed to particularly harsh interventions by youth welfare services. Around 10,450 cases, according to the study, arose from "everyday crises."

The Latest

  • Proceedings in the trial for an Ontario couple accused of killing a 12-year-old boy and torturing his younger brother in their Burlington home are set to wrap up tomorrow.
  • Becky Hamber, 46, was in the witness box for a fifth day today. Hamber and her wife Brandy Cooney, 44, have pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder and other charges. The couple had been trying to adopt the boys.
  • The Crown questioned Hamber on how long the boys would be locked in their rooms, and how often they had access to the bathroom and were given food.
  • Text exchanges between the couple were presented in Milton court. They led the Crown to suggest the boys had been physically abused but Hamber denied that contention.
  • Hamber also testified that zip-tying J.L.’s blistered feet was a "dumb dumb" parenting moment but he was a "willing" participant.
  • Warning: Court proceedings detail alleged child and sexual abuse.

Collaboration between INEA and Stichting Adoptiepedia

Editors

December 5, 2025