In May of this year, an additional hearing on intercountry adoption from Ethiopia was held in the Committee for Welfare, Public Health and Family of the Flemish Parliament. This hearing came after the testimony of Thereza De Wannemaeker who questioned her adoption from Ethiopia in 2009. Various testimonials from Ethiopian adopted children and their parents followed, after which Flemish Member of Parliament Lorin Parys (N-VA) asked for an additional hearing in the Flemish Parliament to hear those involved.
During the hearing, the then Flemish Minister of Welfare, Jo Vandeurzen (CD&V), promised to set up an expert panel to conduct in-depth research into past adoptions and formulate policy recommendations. The former Flemish Government compiled this panel in July. Recently, Christof Bex and Miranda N. Aerts, both adopted and well known with the theme, were also added to the panel. This happened after 23 adoptees in an open letter to the current Flemish Minister of Welfare, Wouter Beke (CD&V), criticized the fact that none of the adoptees co-led the investigation. The panel will meet for the first time shortly to define the content and determine a concrete work approach.
Unfortunately, malpractice within adoption remains a reality, despite efforts made worldwide to prevent them. In March 2016, ISS1 published "Responding to Illegal Adoptions: a professional handbook". This international publication was the first attempt to provide a comprehensive overview of possible recovery and prevention measures. Stakeholders and experts from various countries contributed to the handbook and highlighted action points from a legal, psychosocial, social and political context. In summary, David M Smolin² formulated four perspectives and four recommendations at the end of the handbook, which we present below.
Four perspectives for looking at adoption fraud
1. Adoption as controversial and paradoxical