Home  

More and more U.S. birth mothers choose to place their infants with Canadian families


  
 
While U.S. couples spend tens of thousands to adopt children from abroad, more and more U.S. birth mothers choose to place their infants with Canadian families. Issues of race, money and culture raise questions about
The Oregonian, U.S.A., GABRIELLE GLASER,  July 04, 2004
VANCOUVER, B.C. -- In every way, 11-year-old Gabriel Melcombe seems like a typical adolescent. He wears his hair in an impressive thatch and favors baggy jeans. He listens to hip-hop music. And, like others his age, he is struggling to carve out his identity.

But that search is made complicated by the fact that he is black, being raised by an adoptive white Canadian mother in this city founded by British fur traders.

Gabriel, with his soft brown eyes and ready smile, is the human face of international adoption -- and of a free market reality. At a time when the Western search for children stretches from China and Guatemala to Kazakhstan, Gabriel's birthplace may strike many as surprising: It is Philadelphia.

Americans pay as much as $35,000 to adopt white or Chinese infants. But many African American children like Gabriel have difficulty finding permanent U.S. families at any price. Since the early 1990s, several hundred have found homes -- with white parents -- in Canada.

The irony of one of the world's wealthiest nations exporting its own children has not gone unnoticed. For many, it raises questions about identity, race and the tangled legacy of American slavery.

Important Notice on the Hungarian Adoption Process

Monday, May 18, 2009

Important Notice on the Hunagrian Adoption Process

The following notice was recently published by the Hungarian Central Authority concerning adoptions from Hungary. The US DOS website does not currently contain information on adoption from Hungary . If you are a prospective adoptive family currently working with an agency and hoping to adopt a young child (under 8) from Hungary, please forward this notice to your agency.

Information for the prospective adoptive parents about the number of the applications the Hungarian Central Authority can accept in 2009
:

"The Hungarian Parliament ratified the Hague Convention of 29 May 1993 on Protection of Children and Co-operation in respect of Intercountry Adoption in 2005.

The Hungarian Central Authority has been dealing with intercountry adoptions since October 2005 and according to the three years long experience, the number of the children, their age and health status as well as the high number of the applicants being registered in the international registry the Central Authority determines how many applications they will accept in 2009.

The Central Authority is responsible for the applicants. We informed the accredited bodies several times the last months that there is almost no chance of adopting healthy children younger than 6 years old and in spite of this fact, we received applications wishing a healthy child under 6 even in the last days. There are more than 100 prospective adoptive parents in our registry who want to adopt a healthy child or a child with small, correctable problem under six. So far in 2008 we could only help three international adoptions of children with these characteristics. (There were some other young children, but they had older siblings.) There are plenty of applicants waiting in Hungary and the children under 6 can be adopted in Hungary as well.

According to the above mentioned facts, we do not accept applications in 2009 that are for the adoption of healthy children under 8 years old.

We accept 10 applications from every accredited body (competent authority) that are

* for the adoption of a child (or siblings) above 8.

We accept 5 applications from every accredited body(competent authority) that are

* for the adoption of a mentally disabled or ill child who is under 8.

We accept 5 applications from every accredited body (competent authority) that are

* for the adoption of minimum three siblings.

Regarding the fact that there are a lot of couples waiting in our registry, and according to the Hungarian rules the couples are privileged, therefore we do not accept applications from singles as we do not see any chance that they could adopt from Hungary.

Besides these we do not wish to start cooperation with any new country or accredited body in 2009 regarding the high number of the applications and the low number of the adoptable children in our registry.

We will look through our registry every year and we will inform You at the end of every year about the applications we can accept in the future."

Blog: Bulgaria? . . .

Monday, May 25, 2009

Bulgaria? . . .

On Friday, May 17th we called Hope for the World to see if anything further could be done in Albania. The director told us that, due to the fact that there would be no telling how long everything would take to get up and running, we should not wait for them.

We decided beforehand that whatever his recommendation was, that it would be our final answer. We would not be angry with God nor would we question Him. He is in control and He knows what He is doing. So now we would move on and pick another country.

We looked through all of Bethany's options yet nothing touched our hearts like Albania. Besides we found we were ineligible for many countries. We were not in a huge hurry because we were still waiting for Jen's CPS check from Mass to return. So we were just left with asking God where to go from here.

On Monday, May 20th Jen got a call from our case worker. We told her Hope For the World would not be an option. Jen asked questions about all the other countries Bethany offered. She told Jen what we already figured and what deterred us from the other countries they offered. She then told Jen that they were just informed a few days prior that Bulgaria was opening up and we could think about it. As soon as she mentioned Bulgaria Jen felt peace. When Jen called me at work with the news of Bulgaria, I felt at peace as well.

We weren't sure how we'd be able to give our hearts to another country after falling in love with Albania. But we feel that our willingness to trust God and not question him has released a genuine work of grace in us. Our love for Albania has been supernaturally transferred to Bulgaria.

Part of the peace I felt initially with the news that Bethany was closing the Albania program was that at every point before this when we didn't know what to do we prayed and God answered powerfully. So we were trusting that He would be the same yesterday, today and forever. At the beginning, we didn't know what country or agency and He brought Bethany and then Albania to us. This time we didn't know which country, and He brought Bulgaria to us.

According to one article we read, Bulgaria is the poorest country in Europe. It was finally freed from Communism in 1990. It appears that it would only require 2 separate trips, maybe 7 days each.

So for now we wait to hear back from the case worker as to how we are to proceed with Bulgaria. We pray that there will be no restrictions due to our family size or our income.

Dutch families will meet for their first-ever reunion.

This year on March 13, 2002, the Dutch families will meet for their first-ever reunion. It will be coordinated by Ed and Gerie Mantel, ARC's very first Dutch family. Presently, ARC has 15 Dutch families who have adopted children. This will be a great opportunity for folks to meet and mingle and share the experiences that they have had being first -time parents and/or being multiracial families. Thank you to Ed for facilitating this all-important event! I hope to get some great photos, and maybe even to come one year!
 

Über die Adoption ihres Sohnes Daniel aus den USA im Dezember 2008 berichtet Familie V. aus Niederösterreich.

Über die Adoption ihres Sohnes Daniel aus den USA im Dezember 2008 berichtet Familie V. aus Niederösterreich.
***

Bitte beachten Sie, dass alle „Länderberichte“ die Adoptionsmöglichkeiten zum Zeitpunkt des Interviews wiedergeben und sich die Gegebenheiten in den Herkunftsländern immer wieder verändern. Wir können daher nicht garantieren, ob Adoptionen unter den beschriebenen Bedingungen zurzeit möglich sind. (red.)

Wie kam es, dass Sie die USA als Adoptionsland in Erwägung gezogen haben und warum haben Sie sich letztlich dafür entschieden?

Im Rahmen der Suche nach einem möglichen Adoptionsland hatten wir unter anderem einen Termin mit der für Auslandsadoptionen zuständigen Dame im Verein „Eltern für Kinder Österreich“ (EFKÖ) in Wien. Dort wollten wir uns generell über das Procedere erkundigen. Während des Gespräches wurde eher beiläufig erwähnt, dass es bereits Adoptionen aus den USA nach Österreich gegeben hätte. Nachdem wir durch diverse Urlaubsreisen und einen Studienaufenthalt eine hohe emotionale Nähe zu den USA haben, war für uns klar, dass wir uns diese Adoptionsmöglichkeit näher ansehen wollen.

Dass wir uns schlussendlich für die USA entschieden haben, hängt natürlich auch mit der Tatsache zusammen, dass es im Moment nicht (mehr) viele Länder gibt, mit welchen eine Zusammenarbeit realistisch möglich ist. Auch unsere große Affinität zu den USA sprach dafür. Zusätzlich kam uns die Aussicht auf ein gut geregeltes und transparentes Verfahren sehr entgegen. Je länger man sich mit Adoptionen in den USA beschäftigt, umso mehr erfährt man, dass Internationale- ebenso wie Inlandsadoptionen dort sehr verbreitet und ein ganz normaler Teil des Lebens sind. Adoptionen haben in den USA etwas Alltägliches und auf ihre Art Selbstverständliches.

Curriculum vitae Kees Waaldijk

Curriculum vitae Kees Waaldijk
Full name: Cornelis Waaldijk
Born: 25 November 1958
Nationality: Dutch
Senior Lecturer and Head of PhD Studies
E.M. Meijers Institute of Legal Studies, Faculty of Law, Universiteit Leiden,
PO Box 9520, 2300 RA LEIDEN, The Netherlands
E-mail c.waaldijk@law.leidenuniv.nl
Telephone +31 (0) 71 527 5206 / 5200
Fax +31 (0) 71 527 5221
Home page www.emmeijers.nl/waaldijk
Education
Ph.D., Rijksuniversiteit Limburg (now University of Maastricht), thesis defended on 10 November 1994 (Motiveringsplichten van de wetgever - The Legislature’s Duties to Give Reasons, published by Vermande in Lelystad; full text including Summary in English and Résumé en français available at http://oal.leidenuniv.nl/index.php3?m=16&c=86).
Master Degree in Dutch Law (cum laude), Faculty of Law, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 1977-1982.
Professional experience
From 2000, E.M. Meijers Institute of Legal Studies, Faculty of Law, Universiteit Leiden: senior lecturer and head of PhD studies. Tasks include: running the training programme for around 70 PhD candidates, coaching them and their supervisors, providing training in research methods, and developing Faculty policy with respect to PhD candidates; and - as research fellow in the Institute’s research programme Securing the rule of law in a world of multilevel jurisdiction (sub-programme Fundamental rights in an integrating Europe) - doing research on sexual orientation and the law.
From 2001, Centre for research and comparative legal studies on sexual orientation and gender identity (CERSGOSIG): member of the scientific committee (see www.cersgosig.informagay.it).
2006, member of the supervisory committee of the government-funded evaluation research of the Dutch legislation on the introduction of registered partnership and the opening up of marriage, carried out at the Universiteit Utrecht.
2002-2004, coordinator, and member for the Netherlands, of the European Group of Experts on Combating Sexual Orientation Discrimination, conducting a comparative study (at the request of and funded by the Commission of the European Communities) on the implementation of the Employment Equality Directive with respect to the ground of sexual orientation (see www.emmeijers.nl/experts).
1999-2007, co-editor of the annual collection and commentary of opinions of the Dutch Equal Treatment Commission.
1996-2000, Faculty of Law, Universiteit Leiden: lecturer of Jurisprudence (until 2000; courses taught: Introduction to Law, Legal Methods, Family Law; also setting up and managing the Faculty’s new Evening Programme in Law at the University’s Campus in The Hague).
2000, Hastings College of the Law, University of California, San Francisco: visiting professor, teaching ‘Human Rights Law in Europe - as applied to family, immigration and sexual orientation’ (Leiden-Hastings exchange programme).
1998-1999, consultant to the government-funded evaluation research of the Dutch equal treatment legislation carried out at the University of Nijmegen.
1994-1999, member of the Dutch Council for Family Affairs.
1994-1998, Netherlands Institute of Human Rights (SIM), University of Utrecht: part-time researcher (focussing on free movement of same-sex partners).
1996-1997, member of the Dutch Government’s Commission of legal experts advising on the opening up of civil marriage to same-sex couples.
1982-1995, Faculty of Law, University of Maastricht: lecturer of public law (courses taught, research done and publications made in the following fields: Constitutional Law, Legal Methods, Legislative Drafting, Homosexuality & Law).
1987-1994, Department of Gay and Lesbian Studies, University of Utrecht: part-time researcher and lecturer. Tasks included the management and supervision of several research projects on sexual orientation discrimination in the Netherlands and in Europe.
1989, Department of Law, University of Lancaster, England: visiting lecturer, teaching British Constitutional Law (ERASMUS staff exchange).
1989, Europa Institute, Faculty of Law, University of Edinburgh, Scotland: senior visiting research fellow (Leverhulme grant).
Selection of books published
(with Matteo Bonini-Baraldi) Sexual orientation discrimination in the European Union: national laws and the Employment Equality Directive, The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press 2006.
Motiveringsplichten van de wetgever [The Legislature’s duties to give reasons], PhD University of Maastricht, Lelystad: Vermande 1994.
(with Andrew Clapham, eds.) Homosexuality: a European Community Issue - Essays on Lesbian and Gay Rights in European Law and Policy, Dordrecht/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff 1993.
For a complete list of publications, see www.emmeijers.nl/waaldijk.
Languages
Dutch: mother tongue
English: excellent reading, writing and speaking skills
French: good reading skills, reasonable speaking skills, moderate writing skills
German: reasonable reading skills, moderate speaking skills
Miscellaneous
From 1999, maintaining own website with information about law & sexual orientation (www.emmeijers.nl/waaldijk).
From 1979, formal and informal ‘law & sexual orientation’ adviser to numerous individuals, organisations, lawyers and politicians, playing an active role in several test cases and legislative lobbies.
 

twist in Asia's grim baby trade



twist in Asia's grim baby trade
PHOTO
A law official beleives there are thousands of cases of pregnant Asian women
being used to carry babies across national boundaries. [ABC]

AUDIO from Connect Asia
Trafficking in pregnant women
Created: Mon, 25 May 08:18:39 UTC-0300 2009
Linda Mottram

Last Updated: 13 hours 23 minutes ago

Baby-smugglers have hit on a new angle in business - trading in pregnant women
and using them to carry the item for sale, says a senior Australian law
official.

Australia's chief federal magistrate, John Pascoe, says demand from the
industrialised world to adopt very young babies is driving the new twist in
people smuggling, particularly in Asia.

Mr Pascoe has just presented a paper on the issue to a LawAsia conference in
Singapore, which was looking at children and the law.

He told Radio Australia's Connect Asia program that among the measures needed to
fight the insidious trade should be a new system of children's rights.



Packed in foam

Until recently, says the magistrate, babies have been smuggled in more dangerous
ways, such as in 2003 case when eight infants were found in a boat off
Indonesia, packed in styrofoam fish boxes.

The boxes had been punctured to enable them to breathe, he says, "and put very
crudely, this is seen by traffickers as not a particularly good way of moving
children because there are health consequences.

"It is seen as both safer for the child and safer in terms of detection for them
to move the pregnant mother across the national boundary."

Mr Pascoe notes that trafficking generally is very much a hidden crime, "but . .
. there are fortunately an increasing number of arrests in this area, so we
believe that (the incidence of this method) is increasing and that the numbers
are probably in the thousands rather than in tens or hundreds".


Adoption process

The law officer says there is significant demand from the west for children for
adoption and most of the newborns involved "end up in some sort of illegal
adoption process.

"There's huge demand from first world countries for very young children for
adoption purposes."

Asia Pacific countries should be urged to become signatories "to the various
conventions" that protect the rights of the child. "That is not universal across
the region," he says.

At the Singapore conference, Mr Pascoe urged a system that gives a child rights
which crystallise the moment it is born, and including a right "to know its
nationality, to know who its parents are and generally to be properly cared
for".

He says the region also needs to increase border protection, "so that when
somebody moves across a national boundary with a child that was not on their
passport, for example . . . that questions are asked and that officials don't
turn a blind eye".

He believes many western parents paying for adoption "would be horrified if they
knew . . . that the child had been stolen, as (has) sometimes occurred, or that
the mother actually had no idea what was really happening to her child".
--------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/connectasia/stories/200905/s2579872.htm

Pregnant women being trafficked for their babies
Print Email
Updated May 25, 2009 12:48:54

First world demand to adopt very young babies is driving a new twist in people
smuggling, particularly in Asia.

One of Australia's senior law officers says more and more, smugglers are trading
in pregnant women - the perfect incubators - for access to their newborns.
Australia's Chief Federal Magistrate John Pascoe is presenting a paper on the
issue to the LawAsia conference in Singapore, which is looking at children and
the law.

He says that among the measures needed to fight the insidious trade should be a
new system of children's rights. To illustrate the shift in focus for the
smugglers, Mr Pascoe describes a 2003 case that happened off Indonesia.

Presenter: Linda Mottram
Speaker: Australia's Chief Federal Magistrate John Pascoe.

Listen: Windows Media
JOHN PASCOE: There were eight babies in the boat. They were packed in styrofoam
fish boxes, that were punctured in order to enable them to breathe and put very
crudely, this is seen by traffickers as not a particularly good way of moving
children because there are health consequences and it is seen as both safer for
the child and safer in terms of detection for them to move the pregnant mother
across the national boundary.

LINDA MOTTRAM: Do you have any idea about the extent of the problem, what sort
of numbers we're talking about?

JOHN PASCOE: Sadly this is a crime which is very hidden, trafficking generally
is very much a hidden crime, but there are increasing numbers of reports, there
are fortunately an increasing number of arrests in this area, so we believe that
it's increasing and that the numbers are probably in the thousands rather than
in tens or hundreds.

LINDA MOTTRAM: So why is this growing? Is it just because the trafficking
progress is evolving? The traffickers are finding new and better ways, if you
like, to move the people they want to move or are there other factors there?

JOHN PASCOE: We believe that trafficking is always motivated by economics, but
also there is significant demand for children for adoption apart from anything
else. I believe that most newly born children end up in some sort of illegal
adoption process. There's huge demand from first world countries for very young
children for adoption purposes.

LINDA MOTTRAM: Well, what can be done about this? There are international
conventions on the rights and protection of children but clearly that's
inadequate?

JOHN PASCOE: Yes, I think we need to encourage countries throughout the Asia
Pacific region to become signatories to the various conventions that protect the
rights of the child. and that is not universal across the region. And I am also
putting forward that I think we need to move to a system that actually gives a
child rights which crystallise the moment it is born and those rights should
include a right to know its nationality, to know who its parents are and
generally to be properly cared for.

MOTTRAM: But, is that sort of thing going to really do anything to stop
traffickers who clearly are willing to go to any lengths to make money out of
humans?

PASCOE: I think where there is money, human ingenuity will often find a way to
get it. But I think this is really all about making it as difficult as possible.
We also need to increase border protection, so that when somebody moves across a
national boundary with a child that was not on their passport, for example, when
they entered the country, that questions are asked and that officials don't turn
a blind eye for whatever reason that they may choose to do that.

MOTTRAM: Do you think or have any sense of whether those adopting parents in the
first world with sufficient money have any idea of where these babies are coming
from?

PASCOE: Broadly speaking, I think no. I think many of them are genuinely
motivated by the desire to give a child a better life and I think they would be
horrified if they knew, for example, that the child had been stolen as sometimes
occurred or that the mother actually had no idea what was really happening to
her child.

Burma: the children of Cyclone Nargis

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: AsianAdopteeArchive@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:AsianAdopteeArchive@yahoogroups.com] Im Auftrag von Sunny Jo
Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. Mai 2009 20:55
An: AsianAdopteeArchive
Betreff: [AsianAdopteeArchive] Burma: the children of Cyclone Nargis

Burma: the children of Cyclone Nargis
A year after Cyclone Nargis devastated Burma, many orphans are still
fending for themselves. Their story is only now being told after
documentary filmmakers risked 30 years in jail to defy the junta's
blackout.


By Ajesh Patalay
Last Updated: 5:20PM BST 21 May 2009
Burma: the children of cyclone Nargis
Ye Pyint, 10, has become s surrogate father to his brother, Nge Lye,
three, and sister, May Hnin, six

On May 2 2008, at about 6pm local time, Burma was struck by the worst
natural disaster in its history. Unleashing winds of up to 135mph and
triggering flood waters that surged to 16ft, Cyclone Nargis tore
across the Irrawaddy Delta in southern Burma and swept up through
Rangoon, leaving roughly 140,000 dead and 2.4 million displaced or
severely affected.

Among the survivors were tens of thousands of children, orphaned or
separated from their parents, who in the immediate aftermath were left
to fend for themselves.

Related Articles

   *
     VIDEO: Burma - one year after cyclone Nargis
   *
     Burmese junta says cyclone damage exaggerated
   *
     Myanmar cyclone: Gordon Brown says Burma is guilty of inhuman action
   *
     Myanmar cyclone: Burma junta stage manages Irrawaddy Delta tour
   *
     'Prisons are not meant to be where we mop up all social ills'
   *
     Myanmar cyclone: US Defence Secretary Robert Gates blames Burma
junta for deaths

A year later, some have been reunited with family members, some have
been taken into orphanages and monasteries, and some have ended up in
refugee camps on the Thai-Burma border. But many children are still
eking out an existence on their own, faced with the daily ordeal of
accessing food and drinking water, while living in makeshift huts
constructed out of bamboo and tarpaulin that offer scant protection
from the impending monsoons.

Orphans of the Storm, a remarkable documentary that uses footage shot
undercover by Burmese cameramen across the restricted delta region,
tells the harrowing stories of these orphaned children and honours
their extraordinary resilience in the long year since Nargis.

The idea for the documentary originated with Evan Williams, a former
south-east Asia correspondent for ABC (Australian Broadcasting
Corporation), who approached Ed Braman, the commissioning editor of
news and current affairs at Channel 4, shortly after the cyclone hit.
In collaboration with Quicksilver Media, the production company behind
the acclaimed Unreported World series, Williams, 45, was determined to
document on film the unfolding situation in Burma.

It quickly became apparent how urgent that situation was. In the tense
few weeks after Nargis, the ruling military junta in Burma, the State
Peace and Development Council (SPDC), severely restricted access to
international agencies and aid workers. French and American naval
ships bearing supplies waited offshore for two weeks until, lacking
official permission, they were forced to withdraw. (The SPDC's
hindrance of international relief efforts during that time was
impugned by the US Secretary of State for having caused tens of
thousands of deaths.)

Even when foreign aid got through – Save the Children reports having
reached more than 160,000 people with food, water, plastic sheeting
and basic provisions within two weeks – it proved inadequate to meet
the need. Human Rights Watch later noted that only just over half of
those affected by the cyclone had received any form of international
assistance after two months. Instead of deploying its 500,000-strong
army on emergency relief, the Burmese government was seen to focus its
resources on mounting a national referendum.

For Williams and the team at Channel 4 it was essential to be able to
tell this story through the eyes of Burma's orphans. But how? Foreign
journalists were banned in Burma. Access to the delta for local camera
crews was prohibited. The only option was to film covertly. Williams
knew exactly whom to approach. The Democratic Voice of Burma (DVB), an
organisation that runs a radio and television news service from exile
in Oslo, feeding its material back to Burma via satellite, had through
its network of underground cameramen (or VJs) already provided much of
the early footage of Cyclone Nargis that was shown around the world.
(Their footage of the 'saffron revolution' protests held by Buddhist
monks in September 2007 was used extensively in this year's Sundance
Award-winning documentary, Burma VJ.)

'It is a remarkable organisation,' Williams says of DVB, whose
operatives he got to know during his time at ABC. 'Their cameramen and
reporters risk very long jail terms – anywhere between 18 and 30 years
– if they are caught. But there's this Burmese thing: they won't let
it stop. Every time I go back there's a new generation of kids who are
saying, "This is wrong, we want democracy, we're going to do something
about it." It's incredibly humbling and inspiring.'

>From the outset DVB was keen to be involved, partly to get the story
out but also for the chance to work with an experienced Western
documentary crew ('to increase their own skill set,' Williams says,
'which helps DVB and media in Burma long term').

None the less, the project posed considerable risks to DVB's
cameramen. 'A lot of these guys were used to grabbing quick bits of
information, sticking it in their bag and disappearing,' Williams
says. 'This was a whole different ball game.' For the purposes of a
documentary, Williams required the VJs not only to travel extensively
through the delta in search of stories, but also to return to the same
spots again and again as they followed particular survivors.

Given the proliferation in the area of intelligence officers and
informers, any of whom could shop them to the authorities, Williams
says, 'It upped the danger considerably.'

Williams recruited three teams of two, each comprising one DVB
cameraman and a colleague to 'keep an eye out' while filming. In early
June 2008 the cameramen – codenamed Zor, Sam and Tom – broke protocol
to meet each other (for security reasons the VJs prefer not to be
acquainted) and Williams near the Thai border.

Over the next two days Williams played them various documentaries –
none of them was very familiar with the format – as well as detailing
what kinds of footage he was after. Then, equipped with special HD
video cameras ('slightly bigger than they were comfortable with,'
Williams says), the cameramen crossed back into Burma and journeyed
separately down into the Irrawaddy Delta. Now it was up to them.

Of their first impressions of the delta post-Nargis, one account comes
from a diary kept by Zor, 27. 'When I arrived in Labutta [in the
central delta] I couldn't believe my eyes. I asked myself, "Is this
Burma or what?" The whole town was full of debris and I couldn't
forget the image of people who were chasing after the cars to get any
kind of aid, like food. After that, I went out in a boat and it was
worse. Dead bodies, starving children…'

Approaching each village, the cameramen had first to earn the trust of
the villagers and orphans before getting permission to film, mindful
that at any point they could be informed on to the authorities.

Zor says, 'I had to build a relationship with the villagers. Villagers
know who is who, and if you are in danger the villagers will help you
out. That's how I protected myself.'

Relating the experiences of another DVB team, Zor says, 'A woman
phoned the local government authorities and informed on our cameramen.
Our group had to leave the area by boat, but they were chased by
government intelligence agents all the way back to Rangoon and were
lucky to escape without being arrested.'

Then, in September, fearful of renewed protests a year after the 2007
monk uprising, the government clamped down across the region, making a
number of arrests. For a couple of weeks the DVB cameramen were forced
to stop filming.

The early footage Williams received, smuggled across the Thai border
then sent on to Quicksilver Media's offices in Oxford, was patchy.
'They were still trying to work out what we wanted because they had
never done anything like this before,' Williams says. But the
cameramen were quick learners and by communicating regularly with
Williams, either on satellite phones or via secure online instant
messaging services, the quality of footage improved rapidly.

Over 10 months of filming, some powerful stories emerged. Ten-year-old
Ye Pyint, his sister, May Hnin, six, and brother, Nge Lye, three, lost
both parents to the cyclone and were living together in the east
delta. 'We never found my mother,' Ye Pyint says. 'Someone told me
they saw my father's body with some rubbish on a beach.'

Ye Pyint had become a surrogate father to his younger siblings. 'The
baby is always asking other people for food and if he doesn't get it
he cries,' he says. 'If I cannot get fish or crabs, then we have to
buy food from the shop without paying and then we owe them money that
we have to pay back later.'

The children's 19-year-old former neighbour, Wai, who was herself
orphaned by the tragedy, articulates a dilemma common to the delta.
After the cyclone killed three quarters of livestock, sank half of the
fishing fleet and drove saltwater inland, which ruined millions of
acres of rice paddies, thousands of people have been left without a
job or food. (More than a third of the 480,000 people living in the
Labutta district still rely on handouts from the UN World Food
Programme.)

'If there is a rice crop, I can earn some money harvesting rice but
there is no work,' Wai says. 'I pawned my only earrings and my other
set of clothes to buy some food for the children.' Forced to buy food
on credit (debt is an ever-increasing problem in the region), she
says, 'We try to find some money to pay the shopkeepers back, but we
don't have any. We spent what little money we had on the children when
they were sick and now we have no money.'

In the south-west delta, Khine, a 16-year-old orphan who lives with
her 14-year-old sister, Hlaing, is one of thousands forced to scavenge
for food such as mud fish, river prawns and crabs. 'When our mother
was alive, we would catch most of our food like this and make some
money by selling what we didn't eat,' she explains. 'Now there's only
me and my sister but we don't dare go to catch crabs because too many
people are doing it.'

Khine and Hlaing decided to take the only work they can – a 10-hour
shift pushing a heavy roller in sweltering heat on a military-owned
salt field, which is a three-hour round trip from their hut. It earns
them just enough to buy rice and vegetables, which they supplement
with offcuts given to them for helping the local fish seller.

'I don't know why our lives are so full of misery,' Khine sobs. 'When
it's windy and the tide is coming in I'm scared the house will
collapse and I will die, and then how is my sister going to live? My
sister and I want to stay together until we die.'

Thirteen-year-old Silver Moo, a member of Burma's Christian Karen
ethnic minority, is one of 140,000 children now living in refugee
camps along the Thai-Burma border. Her mother, father, two sisters and
younger brother were swept to their deaths after their house collapsed
in the flood.

Her memory of that night is still vivid: 'The water was rising more
and more, and when the house leant over my mother stood up. She said,
"Pray to God because he listens to the prayers of children." Soon, the
house couldn't stand any more and collapsed, and we all had to swim.
At that moment I couldn't see my mother and brother and sisters. Then
I swam and tried to grab whatever I could reach. I kept calling out
but nobody could hear me. I kept shouting and shouting but nobody
came. I closed my eyes and floated away.' After the storm, Silver Moo
sought refuge at a Buddhist monastery, where several days later she
was reunited with her uncle, with whose extended family she later fled
to Thailand.

For 29-year-old cameraman Sam, bearing witness to such stories as
Silver Moo's and seeing first hand the carnage in the delta left him
deeply shaken. 'I can't imagine how they could escape from that
night,' he says. 'They told me their families disappeared in the flood
in a minute. Some people were hanging at the top of the trees, some
were struck by the arrow-like rain and at last gave up and died in the
water. Some died waiting for rescue. After hearing such stories, I was
shocked and traumatised by their words. I still remember the dead
bodies and the bodies of animals along the river.'

A year since Nargis, most relief workers in Burma stress that progress
has been made in delivering aid to millions of cyclone survivors,
despite early claims of government confiscation. The Red Cross has
sent 130 tons of aid; the World Health Organisation has distributed
350 tons of medical supplies. At the same time everyone acknowledges
the desperate need for more.

Of the £320 million target set by the UN's emergency appeal for Burma,
only £211 million has so far been raised. Unicef has reported modest
progress in providing aid in the form of vaccinations, food for
acutely malnourished children, the rebuilding of schools, and the
registering of 'unaccompanied children'. Humanitarian groups still
warn of the risks to (especially orphaned) children from traffickers
(into prostitution and bonded labour), and of forced recruitment for
children as young as 13 into the army.

Unicef's 135 newly built community-run 'child-friendly spaces' in
Burma, staffed by NGOs trained to provide psychosocial care and
support for roughly 30,000 children, may go some way towards easing
the trauma felt by many post-Nargis. But what Orphans of the Storm
impresses on us most powerfully is how deeply those scars run.
Particularly moving is the story of Min, a 16-year-old orphaned boy
from the central east delta who finds solace after the death of his
mother by becoming a novice monk, only to find himself suddenly
compelled to leave the monastery that has been his home for six months
and journey 100 miles back to his old village where he has no secure
means of support. 'I am not happy [here at the monastery],' he offers
by way of explanation. 'It's not that I don't like the people. I like
them. But in the evening I can't cope with what happened to me.'

For the DVB cameramen, the whole process has instilled in them a sense
of achievement, even hope. In January, halfway through filming, when
they were shown a 10-minute cut of early footage 'a couple of them
cried,' Williams says. 'They were amazed because they could see how
putting together their footage could tell a story and capture the
emotion and reality of what was going on.'

There are plans to air the documentary in Burma via satellite. 'The
most important thing is that we could highlight the forgotten future
of these poor kids, and we hope the world will pay more attention on
that issue,' Sam says. 'If they do, that will keep encouraging us to
work on.'

Tentatively looking forward to a democratic Burma with a thriving free
media at its heart, Zor says, 'I'm afraid of there being a lack of
skilful young journalists in our country. Some have been put in jail.
Some have fled abroad. At this time, the role of journalism is
restricted, but hopefully our role will be in the front line of a
coming democracy. Our country needs a skilful and informed generation
for the future and for democracy to be progressed. I'm dreaming of the
reputable role of journalism in Burma soon.'

The orphans' names have been changed.

'Dispatches: Orphans of the Storm', will be shown at 8pm on June 1, on
Channel 4


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/burmamyanmar/5350077/Burma-th
e-children-of-Cyclone-Nargis---myanmar.html


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsianAdopteeArchive/

<*> Your email settings:
   Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsianAdopteeArchive/join
   (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
   mailto:AsianAdopteeArchive-digest@yahoogroups.com
   mailto:AsianAdopteeArchive-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
   AsianAdopteeArchive-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
   http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Two Men and Two Babies


Story transcripts
You are here: ninemsn > 60 Minutes > Story transcripts > Story transcripts

[x]
Sorry, your configuration doesn't support this feature.
The minimum requirements are MSN Messenger 6.0 or higher and Internet Explorer 5.5 or higher.
Download Windows Live Messenger now.

Two Men and Two Babies
Friday, May 22, 2009
Reporter: Liz Hayes
Producers: Hugh Nailon, Kirsty Thomson
They are not your average suburban couple, but they do have the great Australian dream. A nice house, a big backyard and the kids to play in it. And, a few days ago, their dream really did come true.
Pete and Trev are now proud fathers. They've just had twins, little girls called Gaia and Evelyn.
These days, gay dads aren't exactly news, but, in their own quiet way, Peter and Trevor are pioneers. They bought their family from a kind of one-stop baby factory in India.
Now for a price, virtually anyone, single, married, gay, straight can have children, tailor-made. And what's more, you can do most of it from the comfort of your own home.
Story contacts:
For more information:
www.iwannagetpregnant.com
Medical Director, Rotunda - CHR, 672, Kalpak Gulistan Perry Cross Road Near Otter's Club Bandra (W) 400 050 India
Tel: + 91 22 26552000/ 26405000
Fax: + 91 22 26553000
Email: drallah@gmail.com
Blogs:
·  therotundaramblings.wordpress.com
·  therotundaramblings.blogspot.com
Also try:
·  www.australiaindiasurrogacyadvocates.org
·  www.indiasurrogacy.org
·  http://surrogacyindia.forum5.com
Full transcript arrives Monday.

DSWD to speed up adoption procedures


DSWD to speed up adoption procedures
Cebu Daily News
Posted date: May 25, 2009

MORE than 50 social workers from the courts, local government units, hospitals, nongovernment organizations, child welfare institutions, child caring agencies and local civil registrars were invited by the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) recently for a consultation workshop on the drafting of the implementing rules and regulations (IRR) of Republic Act 9523.

The RA 9523 mandates that as a prerequisite before adopting a child, the DSWD should issue a certification declaring the child as legally available for adoption.

It was signed into law by President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo last March 12 to address the pressing issue to immediately facilitate the declaration of abandonment without undergoing the judicial process.

The law allows the DSWD to implement provisions of the act and issue the certification declaring the child legally available for adoption.