GOOGLE TRANSLATION
It also has the BBC's brushwood: Sue Lloyd R.
Disinformation: A malicious script on adoptions and institutionalized children in Romania. For over ten years, several foreign journalists, more or less known or appreciated in their own countries, looking for things in Romania sensation, shocking revelations, cannons Press. From this point of view, meeting almost all conditions, even as we might say that the providential that can acquire, overnight and false glory illicit business. Our external image, constantly running in the West, seems cut from a film by Emir Kusturica. We appeared, usually in terms of poor countries, with rude people, willing to do anything for money. Political class that is in a constant battle intestine, is ready to pour the accused, but especially to recognize, officially, the sins of others. We are representatives of institutions willing to acknowledge and even support the most terrible and shameless scenarios for Romania, run by Western media. We also have some local journalists, providing false information colleagues from the West or of revenge or the desire to get out of anonymity as they are kept by their own incompetence and reality. We do not have, in turn science to protect us, ability to denounce tendentious false disclosures that occur periodically in the foreign press. We do not have the courage to denounce the lack of professionalism and professional failure deontologiei who are guilty some foreign journalists when writing or doing stories about Romania. For these reasons we lost and we will lose enormous Chapter image, perverse effects of this statement can be easily made by Friday night I looked on TVR 2, an issue that was debated story run by BBC television, which was mixed by hurry-scurry question of institutionalized children, to international adoptions and the so-called sale of children. A report thundering senses and feelings for the English, producing effects of the most unpleasant for Romania. I found with stupefaction, that the media does not know the laws governing the protection of children and adoptions, she was completely unprepared for such a debate, which invited and Mr. Fokion Fotiadis. Basically, Mr. St?n?sil?, former professor of mathematics became the scorer of the talk show, tried to bear and the goat and cabbage, that is justified objections of Mr. Vlad Romano, chief of the National Agency for Child Protection, with allegations launched by Traian Ungureanu, editor of BBC radio. Worse never could. First, note that because the story was denied by the English press, a fact ignored throughout the show. Secondly, the author, Ms. Sue R. Lloyd, has demonstrated a lack of professionalism in the same position in which strayed from the professional ethics of the profession of journalism. Being probably running out of time, Mrs. Loyd and made the whole documentary being talking to a Romanian journalist, Stefan Cândea from? Day event. "He had an obsession, named Elena Busta, which he believes, without evidence ,? Head mafia international adoptions. " Contacted by Mr Lloyd, Stefan When he found a good opportunity to utter statements November denigratoare to Elena Busta, statements taken without any verification by the British journalist. How can you accuse someone in a simple discussion with someone else? What has prevented it jrunalista English to verify statements of Stefan When Police, Prosecutor, the Romanian Committee for Adoptions, etc.? Further, the BBC journalist (television) filmed on the sly, identity without some men, willing to sell their children. Not mentioned, however, that the sale, legally impossible. He had, however, everything on out ... adoption! Three pipe, three kindling, distinguished English journalist concluded that Romania is a? Uterus national good breeding, "which put children on the tape to be sold. Shocking, to me, not conclusions journalist, otherwise predictable but its lack of professionalism and honesty. In addition, Mrs. Sue R. Lloyd is used to lie even to answer. Since Elena Busta refused the proposal that was made, to support an illegal adoption, Ms Sue R . Lloyd and the cosmetizat comment, claiming that previously, on the phone, and Elena Busta would support proposed, but see God, to r?zgândit. Another fallacy: the allegations that institutionalized children are sold by staff placement centers. But how can make a child away from a center for investment, without anyone to stick out. And here was practiced a premeditated confusion. That the money demanded by some employees to be? reserve "child, or to expedite adoption His? illegal aspects, which must be sanctioned without discussion and selling of children from placement centers, a total lack of a false coarsely. Once, years ago, some foreign journalists were free? Mystery of the revolution "and others were presented as presented Targu Mures conflict, there now? Another scenario questionable, ill-intended, the adoptions and the situation of children institutionalized. He and his BBC brushwood. Ralu Filip
