Home  

Legea adoptiei ar putea fi schimbata in 2011

Legea adoptiei ar putea fi schimbata in 2011

Eveniment01 August 2010 - 14:32 - Vizualizari: 760

printe-mailmessengerfacebooktwitter

1

comentariu0

Initiative for Romanian children

Initiative for Romanian children

  Date: 18/10/2010
article "NGOs"

Hope & Homes for Children based in Baia Mare Romania, launches the first national communication campaign. This takes place under the patronage of Princess Marina Sturdza, HHC Romania's honorary president. The campaign aims to attract public attention in Romania on children separated from their families problems and solutions that he proposes as an alternative foundation to the closure of children and adolescents in care classical.

The communication campaign will be held between October 15 to November 30, 2010 on a large number of media channels. So far 47 have been closed classical institutions.

"Entitled" Initiative for Children of Romania ", the campaign is to start the clock signal for the eradication of institutionalization as a form of child protection in Romania. The deadline for this target is 2020. Until then we are enabled humans to state authorities, NGOs, international organizations, companies and individuals to join us this goal, "says Stefan Darabus, national director of HHC Romania.

Source: information-zilei.ro


http://www.stiriong.ro/pagini/initiativa-pentru-copiii-romaniei.php

Polish Adoptions Seen As Righting Romanian Wrongs

Polish Adoptions Seen As Righting Romanian Wrongs
November 15, 1992|By Andrew Gottesman.
In his battered brown attache case, Bill Pierce brought files on 51 Polish orphans with him to Chicago last week.
He used the word ``files`` in a loose sense: They were fact sheets, some connected by paper clip to the picture of a smiling child. Many of the dossiers hadn`t been translated into English yet.
Each told the tale of a Polish child with no home or family.
``The boy wants very much to have his own family home,`` said the file of Sylwester, a 10-year-old, ``to have somebody close forever.``
Pierce, president of the National Council for Adoption, is recently back from Poland and touring the United States, hoping to find a home for each of the children in his files. His first stop was Chicago.
In each city, Pierce will visit several adoption agencies, promoting an experimental method of international adoption developed by the council, an umbrella group for 120 private agencies across the United States.
Pierce said his plan is the first to use a list that contains a country`s complete roster of adoptable children. He hopes international adoptions will become easier as a result of the streamlined process.
He also hopes that his plan helps prevent the black-marketeering, fraud and adoption frenzy that occurred when Romanian orphanages were thrown open after that country`s 1989 revolution.
The debacle all but shut the lid on Eastern Europe`s orphanages, for neighboring countries feared the negative media coverage that Romania had received. Rumors circulated that Westerners were adopting children to train as servants.
Only now are the doors beginning to open again-and Chicago-area parents may be among the first to benefit.
Chicago, with the largest Polish population of any city outside Warsaw, is a natural destination for many of the Polish orphans-all of whom have been passed over by families in their homeland, Pierce said.
``The Polish government just doesn`t want a whole lot of people swarming over Poland like they did in Romania,`` he said. ``I know that spotted around (America) are a lot of Polish-American families who will adopt these kids or at least some of them. My hope is that after a while it is possible for organized, very carefully managed working relationships like this to be seen as a good model.``
He said the program could lead to stronger ties with other former East Bloc countries.

Despre nevoia de echilibru ?i justa m?sur?

Despre nevoia de echilibru ?i justa m?sur?0

Postat pe 16 noiembrie 2010 de ?tefan D?r?bu?

The Telegraph a publicat ieri un reportaj despre sistemul de protec?ie a copilului din România. Eu am fost cu autoarea reportajului ?i am vizitat servicii sociale din dou? jude?e. Autoarea a mai fost în ?ar? în urm? cu zece ani, când a realizat un reportaj similar. Atunci, descrierea ei a fost echilibrat?. Pe premisa c? va face un reportaj similar, echilibrat, am acceptat s?-i fiu al?turi în vizita sa de informare. Din p?cate, articolul publicat ieri demonstreaz? lips? de m?sur? ?i o abordare dezechilibrat? a sistemului de protec?ia copilului în România. Nu pot subscrie la aprecierile extreme despre sistem, cum nu pot fi de acord nici cu etichet?rile negative la adresa autorit??ilor statului. Dup? zece ani de eforturi, dup? realizarea unei bune p?r?i din reforma necesar? în sistem, dup? ce au fost introduse noi legi care îmbun?t??esc în mod evident protec?ia copilului, nu pot sus?ine afirma?ii senza?ionaliste, care ignor? p?r?ile bune introduse cu mult? trud? ?i, totu?i, cu deschidere din partea autorit??ilor române.

HHC România lucreaz? al?turi de stat pentru eradicarea institu?iilor ca form? de protec?ie a copiilor. Evident, institu?iile nu sunt un mediu benefic pentru copii. În urm?torii ani, împreun?, vom dezvolta servicii de tip familial, ca alternativ? la institu?ionalizare. Dar asta cere timp, munc? ?i eforturi. Nimeni nu spune c? nu mai sunt probleme, sau obstacole de dep??it. Vrem, îns?, s? fim parteneri cu statul pentru o reform? s?n?toas? în protec?ia copilului. Nu suntem într-o alt? tab?r?. Nici nu suntem în afara jocului. Suntem ?i noi în teren, al?turi de colegii no?tri din sistemul de stat. Separat, nu vom reu?i mare lucru. Împreun?, avem o ?ans?.

În concluzie, ne distan??m de enun?urile extreme, expuse în prima parte a articolului ”My glimpse of hell and the pitiful children who have been betrayed”, din edi?ia de ieri, 15 noiembrie 2010, a ziarului britanic The Telegraph. Vom continua s? lucr?m, împreun? cu alte organiza?ii ?i cu Guvernul României, pân? când to?i copiii vor fi îngriji?i într-un mediu familial.


Cops nab Congolese for child trafficking

Cops nab Congolese for child trafficking
By Mwila Chansa in Kitwe
Thu 18 Nov. 2010, 03:59 CAT [368 Reads, 0 Comment(s)] Text size Print


POLICE in Chililabombwe are holding a Congolese national for attempting to traffick 11 children between the ages of two and 11 out of Zambia.

Both Chililabombwe district commissioner Timothy Musonda and Copperbelt police commanding officer Dr Martin Malama confirmed the incident in separate interviews on Tuesday.

Musonda said the suspect, Lolo Mashini Lombe, was intercepted together with the children at Kasumbalesa Border Post on Monday.

“Yesterday Monday, 11 children were intercepted at Kasumbalesa . There were six boys and five girls,” Musonda narrated.

He said authorities suspected that Lombe wanted to take the children to South Africa.
Musonda further explained that upon being intercepted by police and immigration officers, Lombe claimed that the children’s parents were in Chiwempala township in Chingola but that after going there to verify his claim, the officers did not find the parents in question.

“So they arrested him for human trafficking and he is currently in police custody,” said Musonda.
And Dr Malama explained that the suspect was found with children of between two and 11 years old.

He said the suspect is believed to have been working with three other people.
Dr Malama said police were investigating the matter and hoped to nab the other suspects.
But police sources indicated that Lombe intended to traffick the children to Canada.

The sources said Lombe had planned to use the Solwezi route through to Angola but was cornered in Chililabombwe.

Hewer on the highway: Mongol Rally, day 21

Hewer on the highway: Mongol Rally, day 21
On the latest leg of the Mongol Rally, Nick Hewer, Sir Alan Sugar's sidekick on The Apprentice, visits the Romanian children's charity for which he is raising funds and learns about the country's harrowing history.

Link to this video
By Nick Hewer 4:15PM BST 23 Jul 2008 Comments


Nick Hewer is raising money for the charity Hopes and Homes for Children - see www.justgiving.com/nickhewer
Having arranged to meet Stefan Darabus, the country director of Hope and Homes for Children at the Baia Mare branch of McDonalds the following day, I cross into Romania and stay overnight in Satu Mare.

We are beginning to travel into a different, more exotic part of the world, but there is always a McDonalds nowadays, and increasingly it is the top place to rendezvous; I met Daniel at the Gorlitz McDonalds all that time ago. It always used to be the railway station. Why, with all the wonderful fresh food that Europe has to offer, we pour into these burger joints beats me. Kids like sweet meat, I’m told.

RELATED ARTICLES

Nick Hewer's video diary 22 Jul 2008
Google Map: Hewer on the highway 06 Aug 2008
Hewer on the highway: Mongol Rally, day 2 03 Jul 2008
Hewer on the highway: Mongol Rally, day 12 15 Jul 2008
Hewer on the highway: Mongol Rally, day 7 10 Jul 2008
Hewer on the highway: Mongol Rally, day 5 09 Jul 2008

Baia Mare means Big Mine in Romanian, and it was a European centre for lead, copper and gold mining, some say from Roman times. Mining has more or less disappeared now, but the city skyline is still dominated by a towering chimney, as high as the Eiffel Tower, they boast. When it was belching at full bore, at the time when Baia Mare was the third most polluted city in Europe, a dark cloud engulfed the area. There was a terrible price to pay in health terms; the pollution was so toxic, I was told, that women’s tights would simply melt away.

When the mines closed, unemployment soared and real poverty followed fast behind. This poverty, and Romania’s childcare policies, developed to a terrifying degree under the communist regime of Nicolae Ceausescu, prompted Hope and Homes for Children (HHC), a British charity dedicated to building a world where every child is loved in a family environment, to start operations.

Adi, the HHC secretary and IT manager meets me and we set off to the HHC office. Housed in a back street of this city, the Romanian headquarters of this British charity, started just 10 years ago, now employs thirty young and enthusiastic Romanians.

When Stefan Darabus, the energetic and clearly impassioned country director, joined HHC as a 23 year-old, there were 480 institutions in Romania, housing 80,000 children.

Explaining the background to Romania’s childcare policies, Stefan says:

“Under the communists, the child became the property of the state, and it became quite normal for families, struggling to survive economically, and with abortion outlawed, to pass their children over to the local government, which would promptly put them into an institution.

“So poverty, lack of local educational facilities, overcrowded housing and child disabilities became the main drivers to creating a massive problem in childcare. It was a problem that was hidden away and our prime objective at that time was to close down these terrible places in our province of Maramures”.

On the face of it, surely every government should care for its country’s needy children, but in Romania, that concept was terribly abused, the result being that perfectly normal children, often just babies, were tossed into these huge “child warehouses” and became hopelessly institutionalised in a very short time.

It should come as no surprise that a childcare system with no money to support it, no training to speak of and a staff ratio of one to 30 children, overlaid with a brutish government and an uncaring community, should be such a massive failure.

Stefan continues: “We wanted to shut down one particular institution and reunite the children with their biological or extended families – remember, these are not orphans, most of them have parents, brothers and sisters, uncles and aunts and so on.

“Other options included national adoption, foster care or placing them with couples or building our own small family-like units with maybe ten or twelve children living together in a small community supervised by motivated and trained staff with a ratio of no more than one to four. Our over-riding concern was to do what is best for the child with the belief that every child has the right to grow up in a family or in an environment as close as possible to the family environment.

“Our absolute determination to change our country’s childcare system was renewed and strengthened every time we saw a young child, institutionalised almost from birth, come into the outside world for the first time.

“I remember seeing a young girl cry with pleasure as she washed her hands in warm water for the first time or the young boy cry with fear as he felt the wind on his face for the first time. It was all ‘first times’ – the first time to see grass, to see an animal, to see the sun go down.

“But don’t think that when an institution is closed down, the children come running into the sunshine as normal children. The terrible damage is done, for example with the self harming little girl who had her ankles and hands tied together behind her head in her cot for year after year so that when they cut the rope, she was U-shaped and could not walk or sit, just rock on her back.

“The children that cannot talk, cannot walk, cannot relate, often cannot eat – for their whole universe in the institution was their cot and their bottle, and the bottle went on for years, maybe until they were nine years old.

Today, ten years after Stefan and his staff started work, the 450 institutions with 80,000 “inmates” has been reduced to 184, housing 17,000 children, mainly with disabilities or special needs. Hope and Homes for Children directly closed 14 institutions in Transylvania, but has been instrumental in the closure of all the others, through lobbying the Romanian government, helping to change radically entrenched attitudes in the old childcare regime.

As Stefan says, “The old guard knew nothing and cared less about the psychological needs of a child; they just cared about putting a roof over their head, feeding them after a fashion, and keeping them quiet. They treated the children like merchandise, to be stored.

“It’s not easy to tell the staff of a large institution that you are going to close them down; that they’ll be out of a job.

"Diplomacy and persuasion are key weapons in our armoury.”

Nowadays, while bureaucracy and time-serving management still are a big problem, HHC is working hand in hand with the government and Stefan plans to halve the number of institutions still operating by 2013.

I spend the rest of the day with Otto Sestak, HHC’s training manager and Gabriela Rosus, a leader/translator, visiting some local projects. In Signet we enter what used to be a baby institution, housing 120 children, since reunited with families or fostered.

Now it has three new functions: a mother and baby unit designed to help mothers with children who are abused at home, or do not have a home or have been thrown out of their home; an emergency reception area where young children in danger can be taken; and a day care centre.

The irony is that in the past, when both parents worked to support the family, there would be nobody to look after the children, so they would be packed away in an institution. Now, this “crèche” exists for 24 young local children and their parents.

Otto takes me next to a HHC “family home”, a house bought with money donated by an English family, where 13 children are supervised by a staff of three motherly women. It is wonderful to hear that three sets of siblings have been reunited here. The remarkable thing to learn is that they did not know they had brothers and sisters beforehand.

But the damage that has been done to these children is clear to see. One little boy aged around nine (they are all so small as a result of poor diet and no exercise) has never spoken. Generally speaking, they are all quiet, but they are smiling now and when I show them how to make a perfect circle with a forefinger and pencil, they set to it with a will. Otto tells me they are making progress but there is no permanent solution and they will stay here until they have finished school.

We now go to an HHC home for moderately to severely disabled children, 12 in all, located in a house in a smart residential street. These children, from maybe five to fifteen, have really no discernable abilities; they were always disabled, but being institutionalised has exacerbated their condition. Now they are part of a small and homely community and the strides made by some are remarkable.

One little nine-year-old boy, who could not walk at all two years ago, is able to do so today with a little walking frame. They had to teach him to eat for he had never chewed food until he came to this HHC home. It was always just mush in a bucket. He still relentlessly chews his hand, for stimulation I am told.

Our final destination is an institution, still run by the government, for typical school-aged children. The 84 boys and girls are here through poverty and differing family circumstances. Otto wants it closed in 12 to 24 months and to have the children reunited with their families, or rehoused in one of HHC’s small family units. It’s easy to see why.

Without a vestige of warmth or sense of community, the mainly teenage children hang around on the bare stairs, or lounge on their beds. There is a yard of broken concrete and the sense of fear among the neighbours is understandable. Pimps still gather in groups at the corner of the street, hoping to lure another girl away to the bright lights and locked doors of Berlin, the Costa del Sol or maybe Cardiff.

I thank Otto and return to bid farewell to Stefan.

He shows me to Hortense, I start the engine. It’s been an intense two days.

Thanks for coming, he says. “The children around us need us to believe in them and to be there for them. Because we believe in miracles and transformations, we will continue to offer them the attention and affection they need, with the help of those who support our charity in England.”

You can find Nick Hewer's donation page for Hopes and Homes for Children at www.justgiving.com/nickhewer

They Stole My Baby

They Stole My Baby

by Constantino Diaz-Duran 
16 November 2010

Jailed for using fake documents in Missouri, a Guatemalan mother entrusted her son to her sister—and he was taken away and adopted by strangers. Encarnación Romero tells her harrowing story to Constantino Diaz-Duran.

Before Encarnación Romero left for work on May 22, 2007, she kissed her 6-month-old son goodbye. It was a day like any other, and she thought she would see him again after her long shift at a poultry processing plant in Barry County, Missouri. Instead, she found herself in jail that night, and she has not seen her boy since.

“I haven’t been able to see Carlitos at all,” says Encarnación. “I haven’t seen him, and I so wish they would let me see my boy, because, imagine, it’s been so long. For a long time I knew nothing about him, when I was in jail, and now I still haven’t seen the boy. And all I can do is pray and ask God to please let Carlitos be with me soon. I ask God to please let me see him soon.”

A citizen of Guatemala, Encarnación entered the U.S. illegally and used fake documents to secure her job at the poultry processing plant. She was arrested during a raid by Immigration and Customs Enforcement and was sentenced to two years in jail followed by deportation. The jail time was for federal identity theft; she used a false Social Security number when she applied for employment, a charge that would no longer be applicable today because the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously rejected its use in immigration cases in May 2009.

Encarnación, who like many legal and illegal immigrants lived with her extended family, asked her siblings to take care of her son. Eventually, one of Encarnación’s sisters became his primary caretaker, but she had three children of her own, including a baby Carlitos’ age, and a full-time job. Overwhelmed, the sister looked for someone to help her care for the baby. As a result of that decision, however, Encarnación’s parental rights were terminated and the baby was adopted by a couple the family had never met.

An acquaintance of Encarnación’s sister had taken Carlitos to the home of the minister of a local Hispanic church. The minister and his wife then got in touch with Seth and Melinda Moser, a young couple who wanted to adopt a baby. By this time, says Encarnación, she lost track of who had her baby, and she began to worry about how she would get him back. “As Carlitos’ mother,” she says, “I just felt so sad. I have to repeat it, because as a mother, you need your children to be near you, so you can look after them.”

Unable to speak English and without access to proper representation, Encarnación agonized during her two-year sentence, wondering who had her child and if she would ever be able to see him again. She has now been out of jail for nearly two more years, and while she at least knows where Carlitos is, she still has not been able to see him or hold him in her arms. “I spent two years in jail, in anguish because I couldn’t reach out to him,” she says. “And now, well, it’s the same, I still can’t see him. But God willing—this is my hope—God willing, Carlitos will soon be with me again.”

“All I can say is that the adoptive parents are not the true parents of my boy. I am his true mother and I, as his mother, have the right to raise my child, and have him with me.”

Encarnación’s parental rights were terminated by a Missouri court, on the grounds that she abandoned the child. This, according to her, is false, because she didn’t choose to leave the child, and she didn’t leave him with strangers. She was arrested, and she left the child with her siblings. “I always communicated with my sister,” she says. “I always asked her how my baby was doing.” She becomes excited when she talks about hearing his voice on the phone once. “I heard him say ‘Mama,’ and I asked my sister who was talking, and she told me it was Carlitos, it was my boy!” After a pause she adds, “But that was the only time I heard his voice.”

After her release from prison, Encarnación sought the help of the Guatemalan Embassy. They got her in touch with attorneys Christopher Huck and Omar Riojas, who agreed to take her case pro bono. Through them, Encarnación was able to track down Carlitos. Her attorneys are now seeking to have the adoption reversed and her parental rights reinstated. They won a major battle in July, when the adoption was overturned by the Missouri Court of Appeals in Springfield. Last week, the case was argued in front of the Missouri Supreme Court.

The Mosers, Carlitos’ adoptive parents, argue that they did everything according to the law and that Encarnación did abandon her child. “She did the opposite of what you might expect someone to do who’s trying to stay in touch with her child,” says attorney Joseph Henley, who represents the Mosers. “She went by different aliases, and therefore all the correspondence that the court sent her, and that I sent her, even that her attorney sent her, all came back refused.”

Huck, however, says Henley’s assertion is a misrepresentation. He explains that while Encarnación did seek employment under an assumed name, the record shows that she told immigration officials her real name during her first interrogation, within two hours of being arrested. She was apparently booked under the false name, but Huck contends that it was neither Encarnación’s choice nor her fault.

Huck also points out that the lawyer mentioned by Hensley was hired by the Mosers themselves. This lawyer represented Encarnación at the adoption proceedings while she sat in jail, and according to Huck, presented a possible conflict of interest.

While Hensley says Encarnación’s immigration status didn’t play a role in the termination of her parental rights, he places much emphasis on the fact that she was in the United States illegally and that she was convicted of a felony that directly related to her immigration status. He also alleges that she had already been deported once before, in 2005.

The Mosers’ court briefs also note that Encarnación has two older children living in Guatemala, a 14-year-old boy and an 8-year-old girl. She says she left them in the care of another sister in order to come to the United States to seek work and a means to support them.

Huck and Riojas are fully invested in representing Encarnación and defending her parental rights. They have spent thousands of hours working on the case. “We calculated,” says Riojas, “and we’ve spent, at least in attorney time, upward of $500,000 to litigate her case.” It is perhaps no surprise, then, that Huck sounds almost personally offended when he hears accusations of Encarnación being a bad mother, or a criminal.

“This family should never have been separated,” says Huck, and he is adamant that crossing the border illegally should not be grounds for a parent to lose the right to raise his or her children. “There’s lots of case law that says that parental rights are some of the oldest fundamental rights that exist under the U.S. Constitution. And you don’t have to be a U.S. citizen for those rights to apply to you.”

Huck says the Mosers and their attorneys have made much of Encarnación’s criminal conviction for identity theft while simultaneously downplaying Seth Moser’s own criminal record. The brief filed by Encarnación and her attorneys at the Missouri Supreme Court includes a long list of Seth Moser’s run-ins with the law. Among other items, the brief points out that “he was incarcerated for ‘almost a year’ for a felony criminal conviction related to possession of stolen property worth over $15,000.” Moser was also arrested for grand theft auto after “a high speed, multi-state police pursuit through Missouri, Kansas, and Oklahoma,” according to the brief. This chase “resulted in a car accident, from which [Moser] fled from the scene” before being apprehended and charged in all three states.

Since her release from prison, Encarnación has been allowed to remain in the U.S. under a special humanitarian visa, which will be valid until her case is settled. She says she realizes that she’ll probably have to go back to Guatemala at some point, but she cannot bear the thought of leaving without her son.

“It’s so hard,” she says, her voice breaking. “This is so hard, what has happened to me. So much time, not being able to see Carlitos. I still feel so sad, but I feel hope. I don’t lose faith. I have faith in my God, and I trust that He will help me and very soon Carlitos will be with me. And all I can say is that the adoptive parents are not the true parents of my boy. I am his true mother and I, as his mother, have the right to raise my child, and have him with me.”

Constantino Diaz-Duran has written for the New York Post, the Washington Blade, and the Orange County Register. He lives in Manhattan and is an avid Yankees fan. You'll find him on Twitter as @cddNY.

Senate calls inquiry into forced adoptions

Senate calls inquiry into forced adoptions

Posted Mon Nov 15, 2010 9:30pm AEDT

The Senate is to inquire into the Commonwealth's role in the forced adoption policies from the 1940s to the 1980s.

Greens Senator Rachel Siewert has won support of the Senate for the issue to be considered by the Community Affairs References Committee.

There have been calls for a national inquiry into the practice of forcing unwed mothers to give up their babies.

Western Australia's Parliament has already issued a formal apology to women affected by the practice.

Tags: community-and-society, family-and-children, adoption, history, government-and-politics, federal-government,20th-century, australia

Cambodia Eyes March 2011 ReOpening

Cambodia Eyes March 2011 ReOpening

posted Apr 6, 2010 11:34 AM by Christina C.
The Phnom Penh Post reported March 30th Cambodian Social Affairs Minister Ith Sam Heng told members of a workshop earlier in the week authorities hope to have new regulations in place for Hague-compliant inter-country adoptions by the end of March 2011.
 
“The government will start to receive adoption proposals from ... other countries who want to adopt Cambodian children,” Ith Sam Heng said.  “We have one year – 12 months – to implement and enforce the inter-country adoption law.”

Despite the proposed timeline, it remains to be seen whether the law will be stringent enough to ensure compliance with the 1993 Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Cooperation in Respect of Inter-country Adoption, which sets strict terms on who should be eligible for international adoptions and how those adoptions should be regulated.

Though Cambodia has ratified the convention, countries including the US, Australia, France and Canada have effectively placed moratoriums on adopting children from Cambodia, citing concerns about the Kingdom’s ability to comply with the guidelines.

Rights groups have long raised allegations that adoptions in Cambodia have fuelled child trafficking.

Call for inquiry into Magdalene laundries

The Irish Times - Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Call for inquiry into Magdalene laundries

PATSY McGARRY, Religious Affairs Correspondent

THE IRISH Human Rights Commission (IHRC) has called on the Government to set up a statutory inquiry into treatment of women and girls in Magdalene laundries. It also said financial redress should be available to survivors.

The Government said it had “asked the Attorney General in consultation with relevant departments to consider the IHRC’s report”, but expressed regret “that relevant departments were not offered an opportunity by the IHRC to contribute to the commission’s considerations of this matter to facilitate a fully balanced evaluation of all the facts”.

The Government was “conscious that the Magdalene laundries were run by a number of religious congregations” and noted the IHRC would not conduct an inquiry itself.

Possibly anticipating this question, commission chief executive Éamonn Mac Aodha said at the press conference that an inquiry by it could not deliver the apology and redress sought from the State for the women and girls involved. “We do not have those type of powers,” he said.

As to the costs of such an inquiry, commission president Dr Maurice Manning said issues at stake were so fundamental that an inquiry should go ahead. “There is no reason why it should be lengthy, as a great deal of the evidence has been gathered,” he said.

Fianna Fáil TDs Tom Kitt and Michael Kennedy, Labour TD Kathleen Lynch and Independent TD Maureen O’Sullivan attended the IHRC event.

Speaking during the adjournment debate in the Dáil last night, Mr Kitt said he strongly supported the commission’s stance. Survivors “should receive an apology from the State” and a distinct redress scheme for them “should be established”, he said. “The survivors of the Bethany Home should be treated in the same way.” He asked the Conference of the Religious in Ireland (Cori) and the four religious congregations that operated the laundries to meet the Justice For Magdalenes group “to deal with the issues of records, compensation and other related matters”.

Last June, the Justice for Magdalenes group asked the commission to inquire into treatment of women and girls in Magdalene laundries. The commission agreed to do so, and to examine the human rights issues arising.

The principal findings by the commission’s inquiry, on which it based its recommendations yesterday, were that “for those girls and women who entered Magdalene laundries following a court process, there was clear State involvement in their entry to the laundries”.

It found questions arose “as to whether the State’s obligations to guard against arbitrary detention were met in the absence of information on whether and how girls and women under court processes resided in and left the laundries”. It found the State may have breached the 1930 Forced Labour Convention and Article 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Of the Magdalene laundry in Drumcondra, Dublin, it said: “The burial, exhumation and cremation of known and unknown women from a Magdalene laundry in 1993 at High Park raises serious questions for the State in the absence of detailed legislation governing the area.”

Olive Braiden, of the commission, said: “We are dealing with a small and vulnerable group of women who the Government admitted as far back as 2001 were victims of abuse.” Dr Manning said: “The State cannot abdicate from its responsibilities in relation to the treatment of women and girls in the Magdalene laundries.”

Prof James Smith of the Justice for Magdalenes group said “the Government must move beyond its ‘deny ’til they die’ policy.”

Maeve O’Rourke, co-author of the group’s submission to the commission, said the State “must convince the church to acknowledge its part in this scandal, and to open up its records”. It should also call on the church “to pay its share of compensation to survivors”.