Home  

Pétition en faveur des familles victimes du moratoire roumain sur les adoptions

Pétition en faveur des familles victimes du moratoire roumain sur les adoptions

Plusieurs eurodéputés, emmenés par les Français Claire Gibault et Jean-Marie Cavada (démocrates libéraux), ont lancé une pétition dans laquelle ils demandent que les autorités roumaines reviennent sur les refus qu'elles ont opposés à quelque 1 000 familles.

Par Rafaële Rivais

Publié le 04 juillet 2006 à 13h57, mis à jour le 04 juillet 2006 à 13h57

Temps deLecture 3 min.

Petition in favor of families victims of the Romanian moratorium on adoptions

Several MEPs, led by the French Claire Gibault and Jean-Marie Cavada (liberal democrats), have launched a petition in which they demand that the Romanian authorities reconsider the refusals they have opposed to some 1,000 families.

 

The question of international adoption in Romania gives rise to a painful battle in the European Parliament. Several MEPs, led by the French Claire Gibault and Jean-Marie Cavada (liberal democrats), have launched a petition in which they demand that the Romanian authorities reconsider the refusals they have opposed to some 1,000 families who would have been, say they, surprised by the moratorium on adoptions, which entered into force in October 2001. They hope to collect before July 6 the 367 signatures necessary for this petition to bind Parliament.

Mrs. Gibault , who specifies that she is "adoptive mother of two Togolese children" , is sorry for the fate of Romanian children who are victims of the moratorium on adoptions, when they have "established emotional relationships" with their future parents: "They must feel abandoned a second time!" , exclaims the conductor. "How are they going to rebuild themselves after such a trauma?" The Romanian authorities claim to have accepted all adoption applications (1,003) submitted before the entry into force of the moratorium and then rejected those made after. These requests concern, according to them, 1,092 children, with whom certain families have come into contact,

Christine and Alain Roques are among the couples who have been refused and do not understand why. "We applied in February 2001, but we weren't offered to meet two children until November 2003!" , says Mr. Roques. They were two brothers, Marin and Catalin, then aged 7 and 5, who lived in an orphanage. The Romanian Office for adoptions assures that it was not the authorities, but a private association which presented these two little boys to them, when it had no right to do so, since the moratorium was running. The Office is unable to say how this association was able to open the doors of the orphanage, where the couple from Aveyron went"every two months, for four days each time, with a translator" . Mrs. Roques regrets that the two children "with whom emotional ties have been established" , are now placed in a foster family.

Offener Brief an den 1.Bürgermeister von Hamburg Ole von Beust

Offener Brief an den 1.Bürgermeister von Hamburg Ole von Beust
Offener Brief an den 1. Bürgermeister von Hamburg Ole von Beust


Sehr geehrter Herr von Beust

Deckt der Hamburger Senat den Handel mit Babys?
Deckt der Hamburger Senat Beamtenwillkür?
Gibt es einen ausländerfeindlichen Sumpf im Hamburger Senat?


Das kann nicht sein ! Wir glauben an Sie!!!!!

Ethiopia: U.S. Families Adoption of Children, for Trade or Charity?

Ethiopia: U.S. Families Adoption of Children, for Trade or Charity?

 

Daily Independent (Lagos)
by Henry Ugboaja

“ADOPTION is becoming the new export industry for our country. Experts I have spoken with are of the opinion that it might overtake coffee as major export industry…”

Those were the words of Ellene Moria, who runs a women’s programme on a local radio station in Ethiopia. They were laden with acrimonious emotion which many historians and social commentators never captured the historic trade in human beings during slave trade with.

Hence, how can one phantom the idea behind some of the adverts put up by the various adoption agencies in Ethiopia on their web sites? Without meaning to say it, this calls back memories of slave trade. Take for instance one of the adverts I saw on one of the sites read thus:

“Agernesh, a lively girl with a slender build and a ready smile, spent her first eight years in a small rural village in the south of Ethiopia…There are sibling groups as well as single children. The majority of the youngsters are between five and seven years of age. All are basically healthy; both physically and emotionally…They learn Western table manners and how to eat with a knife and fork… The children have chores and learn that in American families they will be expected to help in the kitchen, with cleaning and laundry.”

However the manner which children are adopted in Ethiopia goes beyond trade in human being or human trafficking. It all depends on how close or far you hold the mirror to the society. You either check out the socio-economic, psychological and political implications of this to both the individuals and government or you simply hang on to the trade issue.

It is very rare to see a mother in African society give up her child for adoption even in the face of famine. This can’t be said for Ethiopia today. It is still not clear if the mothers of the children given up for adoptions ever get paid. Considering the way Ethiopian government and its various adoption agencies handle the deal, and the fact that some child welfare groups in the country claim that out of a population of about 70 million people, there are more than five million orphans who have lost their parents to famine, war and HIV/AIDS.

In consistence with this, a recent UNICEF report state that more than 4.5 million of Ethiopia’s children are orphaned due to poverty and illness. This means that more than one child in 10 is an orphan. Additionally, the maternal mortality rate for pregnant women is very high — one in 14 women will die in childbirth.

More so, there are cases of women who give up their children for adoption due to their inability to cater for them in the face of parlous economic hardship in the country. Thus, necessitating the creation of adoption programmes by the government in conjunction with the various motherless homes in the country, since government alone cannot cater for the orphans. In a country that has an annual health budget of 140 million U.S. dollars; a small amount of money when compared to a staggering 115 million US dollars estimated for the up-keep of the orphans in a MONTH.

Perhaps, as a palliative measure to cushion the socio-economic effect of this malaise in the country, government streamlined the process to make foreign adoption of Ethiopian children to Western families easier. Thereby, resulting to the sharp increase in the number of foreign adoption recorded in 2003. The 1400 children taken on adoption by U.S. families doubled the 2002 figure.

With some U.S. families willing to pay upwards of 25,000 US dollars to adopt an Ethiopian child, the trade in children is certainly more lucrative than coffee farming. The money realised from this trade hardly gets out of the coffers of both the government and various adoption agencies/motherless homes- since most of the kids are said to be orphans. This business intrigues undoubtedly could be said to have accounted for the tears in Ellene Moria’s voice when she uttered those words quoted above.

There is no doubt that famine and the desire to eke out a living and the sustenance of government activities in Ethiopia have endangered the lives of most Ethiopian children. This has also lead to the traumatization of women and mothers who are more often than not as young as the babies they make.

A recent Oprah Winfrey show which centered on the plight of Ethiopian women captured the predicaments of young girls or should I rather say children of age nine to 14 subjected to early pregnancy. The show revealed some of the health implications of this on the young mothers or better still child mothers. Many of whom had contracted VVF.

In a country that a hundred dollars could do or buy so much for both an individual and family, how many poor families wouldn’t give up their babies for adoption in the hope of getting 25,000 U.S. dollars that some of these babies are being offered up for by adoption agencies to foreigners?

And when this happens, these child mothers are not only ostracized and put away in shackles sometimes, in rooms but are sometimes thrown into the forest at the mercy of hyenas. In order to avoid the terrible stench that oozes out of them. More so, some of these child mothers are said to not only end up with still births, but also with dislocated hips. As a result of the often prolonged period of labour which according to the show, sometimes stretch from nine to 12 days.

With this horrific pictures and stories, I wondered what the Ethiopian government and its various adoption agencies are doing about it. Could it be that they are unaware of the large number of cases of teenage pregnancy and death recorded every day? Why should a government or parent look on while their children are turned into mothers at the tender age of nine? Does this account for the colossal figure of over five million orphans in Ethiopia? Just like the tilling of land with all mechanical means available for a bumper harvest of coffee for foreign exchange, young girls or better still, children seem to have been subjected to the ordeal of producing more babies for agencies who choose to ignore this inhuman activities against Ethiopian children because of the lucrative nature of foreign adoption of babies by some U.S. families who patronize the adoption deal.

Is it even plausible to say that the enormous proceeds from adoption could be responsible for the plight of women and children in Ethiopia? In a country that a hundred dollars could do or buy so much for both an individual and family, how many poor families wouldn’t give up their babies for adoption in the hope of getting 25,000 U.S. dollars that some of these babies are being offered up for by adoption agencies to foreigners? Do these motherless home/ adoption agencies just in the veneer of love and charity revive these young girls infested with VVF for further exploitation? There is just so much going on there with little or no answers coming forth.

However despicable this transaction might be, and in my effort to be objective as I can be in my anger and tears; check out the other side of the bargain before criticizing the individuals or government agencies involved in the deal. How can you describe an issue so nebulous in the minds of the persons who initiated it in the first place? Though the perpetrators of this trade are not faceless, yet criticism against them is hard to come by. Could there be some form of justification for their action, considering the fact that those children may not have had any good life to look forward to in Ethiopia compared to what awaits them in U.S.?

Apart from this, how can the government cater for such great number of children with the little resources at its disposal? How can young mothers cope with the temptation of giving away their children in the face of the untold hardship in the land?

What can one say about this intriguing situation of an encounter between Fari, an Ethiopian lady and a tourist captured on page 20 of April 8- 14, 2006 edition of The ‘Weekly Trust Newspaper’? Fari says her husband died two years ago, leaving her small family to eke out an existence on the street. She further lamented lugubriously, “My child needs something better in life. Something I cannot give him.” When she noticed the joy and gratitude in her son’s eyes when he received a red plastic toy a tourist gave him. Fari’s lamentation should not totally be seen as a mother’s failure. Perhaps, a mother trapped, hard up in a difficult circumstance which numerous Ethiopian civil wars and maladministration have caused over time.

Another delicate issue is how to place the action of some American families who patronize this venture. Especially when some of them claimed to have done it out of sympathy and charity for the helpless and hopeless children, whose plights they learnt about through adverts that project the children as being in dire need of parental care and up keep?

Ugboaja is an admissions counselor in American University of Nigeria – AUN, Yola.

USAID AND CHILD WELFARE REFORM IN ROMANIA

This report was produced for the Social Transition Team, Office of Democracy, Governance and Social Transition of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID/DGST/E&E) by Aguirre International, a division of JBS International, Inc. It was prepared under Task Order 12 of the Global Evaluation and Monitoring (GEM) IQC, Contract No. FAO-I-00-99-00010-00. The authors are Lucia Correll, Tim Correll, and Marius Predescu.

Romanian orphanages are no longer icy gribuses

The images of severely neglected Romanian orphans in bare children's homes are still etched on the retina. But the images need adjustment. "The Romanians really tackled the problems."

by Runa Hellinga June 29, 2006 , 11:03 am

BUCHAREST - From January 1, Romania will definitively ban international adoptions under pressure from the EU. Brussels has demanded such a ban to end suspicions of child trafficking around adopted babies. For example, a year ago there was a scandal surrounding a hospital where mothers were told that their babies had died, when in reality the children had been sold abroad.

To put an end to this kind of abuse, Romania has had a moratorium on international adoptions for two years now. Not everyone is happy about that. The US, Spain and Italy, countries where Romanian adopted children are very popular, argue in favor of keeping adoption options open. They do not deny the problem of child trafficking, but believe that the rules should be tightened up. According to the three countries, children are ultimately better off in a foreign adoptive family than in a Romanian home.

Anyone who remembers the horrific TV images of the early 1990s can only sympathize with that point of view. But those images need to be adjusted. “The problems in the children's homes have really tackled the Romanians. The situation there has improved a lot in recent years," said a Western diplomat in Bucharest.

9th Meeting Group of Commissioners (child rights coordinator etc)

Communication on the rights of the child

(Item for adoption)

- President Barroso welcomed the fact that this important initiative had returned to the

Group’s agenda for a final political steer, before being addressed as a common initiative

to the Commission for adoption on 4 July. He thanked VP Frattini, all the Members of

It may soon be curtains for babies’ day out at Preet Mandir


 Pune  Page One Tuesday , June 27, 2006 


It may soon be curtains for babies’ day out at Preet Mandir

Child & Welfare Dept seeks Centre’s nod to clip agency’s global wings

Sunanda Mehta

Pune, June 26 FOLLOWING the recent controversy over alleged malpractices by the city-based adoption agency, Preet Mandir, the State government has sought the Centre’s permission to cancel the inter-country adoption licence. For Preet Mandir’s head J S Bhasin, who not too long ago attributed Pune’s emergence as an important centre for adoption in the country — ‘‘...this is the mandi, the market for babies’’ — this has come as a rude shock.

Now, The Commissioner of Women and Child Welfare Department has initiated a detailed inquiry into the working of Preet Mandir and has recommended the State government to cancel Preet Mandir’s inter-country adoption licence. This licence allows the agency to put children up for adoption to foreign nationals — a route that is allegedly used by adoption agencies to make easy money.



‘‘The State government has forwarded the request (of cancelling the inter-country licence) to the Central government and we are waiting for orders from them,’’ Women and Child Welfare commissioner Ashwini Kumar told Pune Newsline.

In fact, the Adoptive Coordinating Agency (ACA) has brought to the notice of the commissioner as well as the New Delhi-based Central Adoption Resource Agency (CARA) allegations about Preet Mandir’s unfair adoption practices. One of the complaints against Preet Mandir is that it discourages Indian parents from adoptions so that they can go in more for foreign adoptions, Nishita Shah, chairperson of ACA that clears all adoptions in the city, said.

As per the government rules, a child can be put up for adoption to foreign parents only if at least three Indian parents refuse that child. The rules also state that Indian parents should account for at least 50 per cent of all adoptions from a centre. As per the statistics with ACA, for the financial year 2005-06, Preet Mandir put up 100 children for foreign adoptions as against 62 for Indians.

However, Bhasin dismisses these statistics as misleading. ‘‘Sixty-six per cent of children were put up for Indian parents (including NRIs in 2005-06) and only 33 per cent for foreigners,’’ he said.

Shah said Preet Mandir came in for discussion at almost every meeting of ACA. ‘‘There have been many complaints about the agency charging exorbitant amounts from foreigners and we have brought it to the notice of the commissioner and CARA,’’ she said.

Commissioner Kumar admitted that they have received complaints of Preet Mandir’s alleged malpractices and said they were also inquiring into the allegation of child trafficking. ‘‘Though nothing has come to light as yet to support the allegation, if child trafficking is on then it is a very serious issue,’’ he said.

Preet Mandir has three adoption centres — two in Pune and one in Aurangabad — and is one of the largest adoption agencies in the State where people from all parts of the country and world come for adoption. Bhasin has an explanation for that too. ‘‘We do not refuse a child to anybody. We understand everyone’s requirements and make sure they get the child they want,’’ he had told this paper a few weeks ago.

On Monday, Bhasin again reiterated that the charges were all baseless and misleading and said they would respond to CARA that has issued a show-cause notice to it.





Viewing cable 06BUCHAREST1035, ROMANIA: AMBASSADOR AND PM DISCUSS ENERGY, ECONOMY AND ADOPTIONS

Viewing cable 06BUCHAREST1035, ROMANIA: AMBASSADOR AND PM DISCUSS ENERGY, ECONOMY AND ADOPTIONS

Reference ID

Created

Released

Classification