Home  

Adoption Suspension Leaves Children in Limbo

Adoption Suspension Leaves Children in Limbo By Bhuwan Sharma KATHMANDU, Sep 10, 2010 (IPS) - A big question marks looms over the future of many Nepali children in various child homes in the country in the wake of the suspension by 11 countries of their child adoption programmes for this Himalayan nation. "Children will now have to remain in grim orphanages or may risk a worse fate by staying with families that don’t want them," says Philip Holmes, the adoptive father of two Nepali children and country director of Esther Benjamins Trust-Nepal, a U.K.-registered charity engaged in childcare and child protection and fighting child trafficking in Nepal. Some 400 Nepali children are adopted by foster parents each year from 44 institutional homes accredited by the country’s Ministry for Women, Children and Social Welfare. There is no data available on the number of Nepali children given up for adoption yearly. Besides orphans, Nepali law permits inter-country adoption for voluntarily committed children, who have been surrendered to a child welfare home, orphanage or Bal Mandir, a national children’s organisation, by either their guardians or parents. Problems ranging from fake documents, lack of transparency in handling funds and corruption in the adoption process, which have been reported over the years, have led to the latest round of adoption suspensions. Following similar allegations by recipient countries, the Nepali government suspended inter-country adoptions in May 2007, before lifting the self- imposed ban in January 2009. Intra-country adoptions were allowed to continue although local response to calls for adoption had always been very poor. Even after the 2007 suspension and its eventual lifting, adoption problems continued to plague the tiny kingdom in the eastern Himalayas. In February, The Hague Conference on Private International Law, an inter-governmental organisation, released a report roundly criticising Nepal’s adoption system, citing gross irregularities. In 2008, Nepal came up with the "Terms and Conditions and Process for Granting Approval for Adoption of Nepali Child by an Alien." These, however, were "not adequate as a legal framework to conduct inter-country adoptions," said the Hague Report. It added that Nepal’s refurbished laws still "fall short of Hague Convention standards." The report recommended "better regulations of children’s homes" and elimination of "financial gain from inter-country adoption." On Aug. 6, the U.S. government slapped a ban on inter-country adoptions from Nepal, citing the need "to protect the rights and interests of certain Nepali children and their families, and of U.S. prospective adoptive parents." Ten other countries – Canada, Denmark, Germany, France, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, Spain, Italy and Britain – had previously taken similar actions following the release of The Hague report. "A few bad apples are besmirching the image of the entire sector," says Sher Jung Karki, undersecretary of the Ministry of Women, Children and Social Welfare. "There are mainly two problems plaguing the sector: The documentation process is shoddy, which weakens the cases even of children who genuinely qualify for adoption," says Upendra Keshari Neupane, a member of the government’s Investigation, Recommendation and Monitoring Committee on inter-country adoption. "The second is the practise by some child centres of resorting to fake documents in order to put up even unqualified children for adoption," Neupane adds. Data reveals that foster parents prefer to adopt children who are younger than three years. "The primary problem is with the huge amount of money involved," says Holmes. "When one has to pay 8,000 U.S. dollars to adopt a Nepali child, of which 5,000 dollars goes to the child care centre, there are bound to be irregularities. In Nepal, 5,000 dollars is quite a big amount." "The adoption fee has to be brought down to curb irregularities," Holmes says, adding, "a blanket suspension is not the answer to the problem." But Karki points out that Nepal’s adoption fee is quite low compared to many other countries. Institutional homes, he says, need money to take care of many other children who remain in their care. Holmes believes the Nepali government should be given the benefit of the doubt, noting that there has been some progress since authorities reopened the sector in 2009. "When I adopted my first child in 2006, I was liaising directly with the child care centre, which is wrong," Holmes says. "But I got my second child in 2009 through the central allocation system. I filed an application in May and until September, when we finally brought him home, we were not allowed to meet him." According to Article 29 of the 1993 Hague Inter-country Adoption Convention, which Nepal signed in April 2009 but has yet to ratify, direct contact between the prospective adoptive parents and the biological parents or guardians is not permitted before verification of the suitability of the child and the prospective adoptive parents. Ministry of Women, Children and Social Welfare spokesperson Ram Prasad Bhattarai says, "more needs to be done but things are changing." Karki echoes Bhattarai’s observation. "Things are moving forward," says Karki. "We are working to nip the problem in the bud by developing a system whereby a child can be taken in by the institutional homes only after doing a thorough check of his or her background." "We are also trying to lay down stringent punishment for those trying to turn the industry into a money-making business," Karki adds. "Right now, we can do nothing other than delisting the centre from our list of centres accredited by the ministry for inter-country adoption." Neupane believes widespread poverty is also fuelling the irregularities. Poor parents have been found colluding with institutional homes to make it appear their children are orphans, he says. "Sometimes they do it in the hope that their child will have a better future while at other times, acute poverty forces them to do this for some money," Neupane says.

.

The Deadly Trade of Child Organ Trafficking

The Deadly Trade of Child Organ Trafficking20/01/2007


 

Srinagar, Asharq Al-Awsat- The horrific killings of 19 children and women in the Indian slum of Nithari, close to the affluent area of Noida on the outskirts of India’s capital, Delhi, has brought into focus the horrific trade of human organ trafficking that is claiming the lives of thousands of children worldwide.

There is huge demand and a market for body parts especially eyes, hearts and kidneys belonging to children. Estimates indicate that at least one million children have been kidnapped and killed in the past 20 years for organs. A kidney or eyes can fetch up to US $10,000 and a heart could cost US $50,000 or more. Estimates further indicate that money laundering in this deadly trade accounts for up to 10% of the world's GDP, or as much US $5 trillion. As a result, the black market for children's organs is expanding and more and more children are kidnapped and killed.

While victims are primarily from Asia, Eastern Europe, the former Soviet Union, Latin America and Africa, trafficking also takes place in developed countries.

Those who take part in this trade make false promises about employment opportunities for the children and give money to the parents. Children are also stolen from orphanages, or handed over through a fake adoption process and killed for their organs. The intermediary may earn between US $50 and US $20, 000 per child according to the source countries. In many cases, impoverished parents are sometimes persuaded to sell their children's organs for as little as US $500.

According to Dr Sam Vaknin, the Senior Business Correspondent for United Press International (UPI), a kidney fetches US $5000 in Turkey. A kidney from an Indian or Iraqi child, however, would cost a mere US $2000. Such amounts are pitiful in comparison to the thousands of dollars that wealthy individuals would pay for an organ.

A recent report of a retired Italian couple, who had been arrested for buying a five-year-old Albanian boy to provide organs for a transplant for their grandson and who paid US $6000 to the trafficking gang, is a clear indicator to this trade.

In Russia in late 2000, a grandmother was arrested for trying to sell her five-year-old grandson Andrei. With the help of the boy's uncle, the child was handed over to a man in exchange for US $90,000 who would then take him to "the West," where his kidneys and other organs would be removed and sold.

In 2001, Britain was also pressed by allegations of storing hearts, lungs, brains and other organs from children in hospitals. A Dutch pathologist Dick Van Velzen at the Alder Hey Children's Hospital in Liverpool had confessed to removing hundreds of thousands of organs from children’s bodies and storing them in hospitals all over the country. The doctor told the BBC program ‘Panorama’ that body parts from living children were given to a pharmaceutical company for research in return for financial donations following management's instructions.

An inquiry by a British Medical Officer reported that in addition to over 2,000 hearts, there were a large number of brain parts, eyes taken from over 15,000 stillborn foetuses and perhaps most disturbingly of all, a number of children's heads and bodies. Professor Van Velzen, who was sacked from a hospital in Canada where he faced similar charges also worked at a hospital in Holland.

In 2004, Israeli doctors were charged of harvesting organs from Palestinian children.

In a culture where everything can be bought for a price, it seems as if the children are the ones paying the ultimate price.

Human organ trafficking has become a particularly profitable international trade. International criminal organisations have identified the opportunity created by the large gap between organ supply and demand.

There are millions of affluent individuals who await organs such as the heart, lung, liver, pancreas, kidney and intestines for transplants.

An escalating global demand for transplantable organs has been exacerbated by advances in pharmacology, better immunosuppressant drugs, and by improved medical transplant procedures. Thanks to the progress of science, the human body has become a valuable source of raw materials. Blood, organs, tissue, bone, sperm, ova, corneas, skin, embryos and placenta now all have commercial value.

A research team led by Nancy Scheper-Hughes, Professor of Anthropology at Berkeley and one of the founding members of Organ Watch, has conducted comprehensive field research into the global trafficking of human organs and documented the practices of organ harvesting in many parts of the world, notably Argentina, Brazil, Cuba, Israel, Turkey, South Africa, the United States, the United Kingdom and Asia. This research shows that abuses range from the harvesting of organs from executed prisoners in China to the removal of organs from live and dead bodies in Argentina and South Africa without the permission and knowledge of the families of the deceased.

Organ Watch has reported cases such as the charging of four American men in 1996 who illegally took bones and organs from over 1000 corpses. The men are said to have paid up to US $1000 per body to funeral home directors, with the bodies yielding up to US $250,000 dollars.

Dr. Crockett, an English kidney specialist, lost his license to practice medicine for life in 1989 because he had organized a network to sell children in Turkey to India for kidney transplants.

An American lawyer was arrested in Peru in 2004, after having exported a total of three thousand children in thirty months to the United States and Italy for organ transplants.

Latin America, Mexico and Brazil where human organ trafficking has been practiced for decades have the worst proven record of abuses against children for organ transplants.

The first official exposure was in 1986 in the Altiplano and Tamaulipas areas and the suburbs of San Luis in Latin America when children began disappearing rapidly and then returned to their families several weeks later with one kidney missing. The probe disclosed that the children had been taken to clinics near the U.S border.

A few years later, the police discovered several clandestine "nurseries" known as "casas de engorde" in Honduras. The children from here were illegally exported out of the country "for adoption." Investigations made a dramatic disclosure that the children were bought or stolen from poor families, and were sold for a minimum of US $10,000 each to organizations in the United States to be used as organ donors.

In August 1988 the revelations of Judge Angel Campos in Asuncion, Paraguay in Brazil also attracted a lot of attention. The police broke up an organization that was exporting children from Brazil in lieu of adoption.

The judge became wary about the fact that the children were being adopted by people "who did not seem to care whether the child walked with a limp, or had a harelip, or was born with an arm missing."

An adoption scandal also broke out in Italy in 1999 when 4000 Brazilian children arrived in Italy for adoption in four years. One thousand of them were located, however the other three thousand had disappeared without a trace. Two Italian judges, Angelo Gargani and Cesar Martinello went to Salvador de Bahia in Brazil. Upon their return, they warned the government that the Mafia was taking part in "human organ trafficking." These children were sent to clandestine clinics in Mexico and Thailand, as well as in Europe where they were dissected for their organs.

The trade continues to flourish even today. During the Dirty War in Argentina in the late 1970s and early 1980s, children were stolen and killed as physicians often collaborated with the military state. Anthropologist Marcelo Suarez Orozco (1987) described in lurid detail the abuse of children during the Dirty War. Babies and small children were kidnapped and then returned to their families with organs missing. In another case, in Ukraine, babies were stolen at birth and used for stem cell research. In 2005, media reports said that babies were taken from the mothers after delivery and parents were told that the babies had died after birth.

The trade, outlawed in all but a handful of countries, is legal and booming in Pakistan. According to a recent Pakistan Tribune report, frustrated by lengthy waiting lists at home and fearful of premature death, "transplant tourists," from Europe, the US and the Middle East are flocking to private Pakistani hospitals for operations which can be arranged in a matter days at a fraction of the cost in their native countries.

In 2004, similar instances of kidnapping in Afghanistan also made headlines. Ali Ahmad Jalali, the Interior Minister had also said that hundreds of children had been taken out of the country illegally in recent years, and some had been kidnapped for their organs.

petition Macaluso

ostato: 09 Marzo 2008 alle 14:28

PETITION

IN SUPPORT OF THE ROMANIAN CHILDREN WHO CANNOT LIVE WITH THEIR ADOPTING FAMILIES WHO FOR YEARS THEY HAVE BEEN HAVING AFFECTIVE AND LASTING RELATIONS WITH

Since Article 194 of the Treaty of the European Commission;

Given the Articles 191, 192 and 193 of Regulation of the European Parliament;

Adoption for Italian couple?!

Durante il soggiorno a Ulaan Baatar, si è instaurata una collaborazione temporanea con l’ONG italiana Amici dei Bambini, che si occupa di adozioni internazionali e opera in una ventina di paesi, tra cui la Mongolia. La coordinatrice Nadia Nisi ha chiesto un parere medico su un bambino locale di 2 anni, con probabile ritardo mentale, e che è in attesa di essere adottato da una coppia italiana. Dopo la visita della pediatra Roberta e della fisioterapista Franca (che purtroppo ha confermato tale sospetto), Nadia ha invitato Franca presso un istituto per bambini con handicap, le cui suore e insegnanti hanno chiesto di potere apprendere le nozioni basilari sul massaggio terapeutico. Così Franca ha tenuto un corso intensivo di tre giorni sulle tecniche del massaggio, rendendo così più intensa e utile la sua collaborazione con Amici dei Bambini.

Anatomy of an Adoption Crisis | Foreign Policy

Anatomy of an Adoption Crisis

An exclusive investigation uncovers how State Department officials uncovered systemic corruption in the Vietnamese adoption system -- and how they struggled to do something about it.

BY E.J. GRAFF | SEPTEMBER 12, 2010

 

It seemed like a nightmare right out of Kafka. In late 2007 and early 2008, Americans with their adopted babies in arms, or pictures of babies to come, were being stonewalled by faceless U.S. bureaucrats. The U.S. government refused to issue visas that would allow those babies to come home from Vietnam -- and wouldn't explain why.

LA DEPRESSIONE POST-ADOZIONE

LA DEPRESSIONE POST-ADOZIONE

01/01/2006

E’ ormai riconosciuto che la depressione post-partum sia un problema reale,e sempre più spesso si sente parlare di prevenire questa vera e propria patologia che colpisce le mamme e quindi la famiglia.

Nelle forme più blande si tratta di cambiamenti ormonali che non strutturano certamente una psicosi ma che colpiscono almeno il 50% delle donne che partoriscono.

La depressione post-adozione di contro non viene riconosciuta e spesso passa sotto silenzio, anche perché non ha un’origine così certa ed è quindi molto meno comprensibile. Trae origine dal lungo processo preadottivo, l’attesa e l’arrivo del bimbo sognato.

L'albo degli enti autorizzati appena pubblicato subirà modifiche?

L'albo degli enti autorizzati appena pubblicato subirà modifiche?

L'albo è controllato ed aggiornato dalla Commissione che può, conseguentemente ad altre domande che le dovessero pervenire, aggiungere altre associazioni che siano in possesso dei requisiti per operare come ente autorizzato. Inoltre anche gli enti che sono ora nell'albo possono chiedere autorizzazioni per altri paesi. È infine possibile che gli enti iscritti all’albo vengano cancellati per sospensione o per revoca dell’autorizzazione, il che può accadere quando vengano meno i requisiti o quando abbiano commesso delle irregolarità. Tutti gli aggiornamenti vengono effettuati sul sito internet della Commissione, mentre alla fine di ogni anno solare sarà pubblicata sulla G.U. la nuova edizione dell'albo.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Una coppia in possesso del decreto di idoneità può rivolgersi ad un ente autorizzato che non opera nella propria Regione di residenza?

No, deve rivolgersi ad un ente autorizzato ad operare nella propria regione di residenza o ad ente autorizzato ad operare per l'intero territorio nazionale.

dominio balkansnetwork.net.

E-Learning

Activity

Forum

Links

Login

Sono disponibili le caselle di posta elettronica per il dominio balkansnetwork.net.

Ragazzi... basta iscriversi al nostro forum!

Il Network intende promuovere il dialogo giovanile multiculturale a livello europeo e il processo di pacificazione nella regione balcanica con la creazione e consolidamento di una rete di relazioni locali e internazionali, anche attraverso l’utilizzo delle nuove tecnologie.
Si intende inoltre sviluppare nei giovani dei vari Paesi la convinzione e le capacità per rivendicare il loro ruolo nella ricostruzione del tessuto sociale e del futuro di pace dei loro Paesi partendo dal nucleo familiare. Solo attraverso di loro è possibile sperare di contrastare e sradicare il focolaio di odio e razzismo che ancora serpeggia.

Balkansnetwork aims to promote, at a European level, multicultural dialogue among young people from different countries, and also the peacekeeping in the Balkan area through a net of local and international relationships, thanks to the help of New Technologies too.
Furthermore, it aims to develop in the involved young people the firm belief and the skills to claim their role in the reconstruction of the social tissue for a future of peace in their countries, starting from the revaluation of the family unit. Only through them it’ll be possible to have results in opposing and rooting out the source of hate and racism that unfortunately is still diffused.

Associazione Amici dei Bambini

:: Per qualsiasi informazione sul network: coordinamento@balkansnetwork.net (For whichever information on the network) ::
:: Per informazioni tecniche: webmaster@balkansnetwork.net (For technical information) ::
:: © 2003 Amici dei Bambini - oggi è il 10.6.2004 ::

http://web.archive.org/web/20040610005319/www.balkansnetwork.net/

 

PROGETTO: " COSTRUIAMO UN PONTE" IN ETIOPIA

 08/10/2006

PROGETTO: " COSTRUIAMO UN PONTE" IN ETIOPIA

Leggi articolo

» 29/09/2006 - NOTIZIE DALLA “MISSIONE SHAMBU” DI ETIOPIA

Leggi articolo

Legge sulla "Privacy"

Legge sulla "Privacy"

 

Informativa art. 13 D.Lgs. 196/2003

Si informa il sottoscrittore della presente che il decreto legislativo n. 196/2003 prevede la tutela delle persone e di altri soggetti rispetto al trattamento dei dati personali.
Secondo le leggi indicate, tale trattamento sarà improntato ai principi di correttezza, liceità e trasparenza tutelando la riservatezza e i diritti del sottoscrittore.
Le seguenti informazioni vengono fornite ai sensi dell'articolo 13 del decreto legislativo n. 196/2003.

Art. 7
Diritto di accesso ai dati personali ed altri diritti

1. L'interessato ha diritto di ottenere la conferma dell'esistenza o meno di dati personali che lo riguardano, anche se non ancora registrati, e la loro comunicazione in forma intelligibile.

2. L'interessato ha diritto di ottenere l'indicazione:
a) dell'origine dei dati personali;
b) delle finalità e modalità del trattamento;
c) della logica applicata in caso di trattamento effettuato con l'ausilio di strumenti elettronici;
d) degli estremi identificativi del titolare, dei responsabili e del rappresentante designato ai sensi dell'articolo 5, comma 2;
e) dei soggetti o delle categorie di soggetti ai quali i dati personali possono essere comunicati o che possono venirne a conoscenza in qualità di rappresentante designato nel territorio dello Stato, di responsabili o incaricati.

3. L'interessato ha diritto di ottenere:
a) l'aggiornamento, la rettificazione ovvero, quando vi ha interesse, l'integrazione dei dati;
b) la cancellazione, la trasformazione in forma anonima o il blocco dei dati trattati in violazione di legge, compresi quelli di cui non è necessaria la conservazione in relazione agli scopi per i quali i dati sono stati raccolti o successivamente trattati;
c) l'attestazione che le operazioni di cui alle lettere a) e b) sono state portate a conoscenza, anche per quanto riguarda il loro contenuto, di coloro ai quali i dati sono stati comunicati o diffusi, eccettuato il caso in cui tale adempimento si rivela impossibile o comporta un impiego di mezzi manifestamente sproporzionato rispetto al diritto tutelato.

4. L'interessato ha diritto di opporsi, in tutto o in parte:
a) per motivi legittimi al trattamento dei dati personali che lo riguardano, ancorché pertinenti allo scopo della raccolta;

Formula di consenso

Acquisite le informazioni che precedono, rese ai sensi dell'art. 13 del D.Lgs. 196/2003, consento al trattamento dei miei dati come sopra descritto.

 

http://web.archive.org/web/20070622162640/www.amonlus.org/privacy.php