Home  

China tries out changes to one-child rule

China tries out changes to one-child rule


EnlargeBy Calum MacLeod, USA TODAY

In Cloudy Ridge, China, census worker Wang Xiurong, left asks Cao Xiurong, center, to check her household documents for the national tally.


By Calum MacLeod, USA TODAY
BEIJING — With a wide smile and a newly issued census bag, Wang Xiurong walked the lanes of Cloudy Ridge, a village beside the Great Wall.
Wang and 100,000 others had fanned out across the Chinese capital to register residents for a once-a-decade census that begins nationwide Nov. 1. Wang, 45, said she's happy with one child, a daughter, 21, but it's a different story at the first household she registers.
PILOT PROJECTS: Feedback sought on one-child rule
"I wanted to have another child, preferably a girl, but the policy doesn't allow it, nor our own economic situation," said farmer Cao Xiurong, 39, whose son is 15. "I really hope my son will be allowed to choose how many children he has."
That choice may become reality for increasing numbers of parents, said Peng Xizhe, a professor at Shanghai's Fudan University, as the census data will prove crucial to planned reforms of China's "one-child policy."
"We do not have widely accepted population figures, especially fertility figures," Peng said. "If society and government get a better understanding of the situation, then it will be easier to make population policy."
Debates about policy change have gone on for years, but "hopefully we can see the policy changes happening early next year," he said.
Liang Zhongtang, a former senior adviser to China's family planning commission, said "officials are now working out plans for pilot projects in some provinces" that will relax birth restrictions.
Independent demographer He Yafu agrees that 2011 will see change.
"Using the new statistics, officials and experts will draft new laws on family planning," he said.
For 30 years, China has strictly limited family sizes. The policy was set to keep the population at a level that the Communists felt the country could handle. In 1980, the Communist Party stated that the policy would last for 30 years, said professor Siu Yat-ming, who researches Chinese family planning at Hong Kong Baptist University. "Now it's 30 years later, a lot of people are asking, 'Will they relax the policies?' " he said.
The first change will come in five areas, demographer He said. With a population of 230 million, the provinces of Heilongjiang, Jilin and Liaoning, in northeast China, and Zhejiang and Jiangsu, in eastern China, will allow couples with one spouse who is an only child to have a second child, he said.
This represents an easing of current rules that permit second births where both parents are single children. Rural families have long been allowed to have a second child if the first is a girl.
Small-scale experiments in a handful of cities have already shown that birth rates do not necessarily rise if the restrictions are eased, Siu said. The pilot areas also produced a more normal gender balance, he said, compared with the stark imbalance nationwide caused by the traditional preference for boys, and abetted by illegal use of ultrasound technology, followed by selective abortions.
But he said top officials are still reluctant to make big changes, even though China is facing a problem of not enough babies being born, especially girls.
The Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, a Beijing think tank, suggests that by 2020 there will be 24 million more men of marriageable age (roughly 19 to 45) than women.
"The sharp rise in the number of men of marriageable age who fail to find wives will become a big hazard," Tian Xueyuan, deputy director of the Population Association of China, told the China Daily newspaper.
"It will increase incidences of women being bought as wives, as well as abduction and trafficking, and prostitution and pornography," Xueyuan said.
All Chinese should enjoy the right to choose, said Steven Mosher of the Population Research Institute, an anti-abortion organization based in Virginia.
Mosher said the pilot program is a step in the right direction, "but it's not reproductive freedom."
"As long as the state declares it has the right to dictate the number of children, you will continue to have" abuses including forced abortions and sterilizations," which are widespread, he said.
"The whole exercise is one of government exercising control rather than any economic argument," Mosher said.
In response to an interview request, the Shanghai bureau of the National Population and Family Planning Commission issued a statement reiterating current policy: "encourage citizens to have late marriage and late childbirth, one child per couple. Those who meet the legal conditions can ask to arrange having another child."
Yet in Shanghai, family planning officials have for the past year been urging wider adoption of a "two child policy" for single children who marry, a loophole long permitted but only relevant in recent years as the first generation of single children reached marriage age.
Now the city aims to be part of reforms allowing a second birth if just one spouse is an only child, Xie Lingli, director of the city's Population and Family Planning Commission, told the Shanghai Daily in July.
"We know the one-child policy is unfair, but, to most Chinese people, it's not about fairness, but about money," said Shi Huili, a Beijing–based photographer who married this June. "If you have enough money, you can give birth to three, four or even more children, you only have to pay the fine."
As single children, Shi and wife Zhang Xue, both 26, can have two of their own, but the rising cost of kindergarten may restrict them to one, he said.
Back at Cloudy Ridge, farmer Cao Xiurong dreams of having a grandson and granddaughter. But she worries that even if it is allowed, the cost of raising children is soaring too high for her son, who will have to support his parents and grandparents.
"The pressure on him could be even greater," Cao said.
Contributing: Sunny Yang


Preet Mandir: Bombay HC allows adoption of 17 children

Preet Mandir: Bombay HC allows adoption of 17 children

Express News Service Tags : court, temple, preet mandir Posted: Fri Sep 10 2010, 06:14 hrs Pune:  

 

 

The Bombay High Court recently allowed Preet Mandir to continue the adoption process of 17 children that had begun before the adoption home’s licences were revoked. “All these 17 cases are of foreign adoption and Central Adoption Resources Agency (CARA) has undertaken to give a no-objection certificate in these 17 inter-country adoptions,” said advocate Ajit Kulkarni, who represented Preet Mandir in the Bombay High Court.

 

 

The two-member bench of Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justice R P Sondur-Baldota on Wednesday set aside the cancellation of adoption license of Preet Mandir stating it is against natural justice, but said the licences remain to be suspended till the the case continues in the court. Though the move has come as a major relief for the 17 adoptions, the court is yet to decide on whether the remaining children in Preet Mandir can be transferred to another adoption house. The matter is expected to be heard on September 16.

Minister requests investigation into foreign adoption case

Minister requests investigation into foreign adoption case

Family and Population Minister Moushira Khattab has submitted a formal request to the attorney-general for investigations into a case in Qalyubiya in which parents are alleged to have put their children up for adoption by Egyptian expatriates living in Europe.
“Such practices violate human and child rights and represent a form of child trafficking,” Khattab said, adding that the law granted the state the authority to bring the parents in question to trial.
Al-Masry Al-Youm has obtained documents proving the existence of "agents" tasked with mediating adoption deals between Egyptian families and expatriate Egyptians in European countries, particularly Italy, the Netherlands and Sweden.
More than 25 documents reveal that adopted children--all under the age of 15--come mostly from the villages of Aghour al-Soghra and Aghour al-Kobra in the Qalyubiya Governorate, located some 30 km north of Cairo.
According to a judicial source speaking on condition of anonymity, more than 500 children this year alone have been sent to Europe for this reason--without any social or legal repercussions--even though the practice is in complete violation of both Egyptian and Islamic law.
It is notable that, in compliance with Islamic Sharia, Egypt's Child Law explicitly prohibits adoption.
Egyptian laws against human trafficking consider guilty anyone involved in the practice, whether by selling, offering to sell, purchasing, transporting or delivering children--either domestically or across national borders--through the use of force, threat, fraud, deception or abduction.
Translated from the Arabic Edition.

US couple in court in Russian adoption abuse case

US couple in court in Russian adoption abuse case


* Lawyer says final settlement expected
* Case has garnered media attention in Russia
By Keith Coffman
FORT COLLINS, Colo., Sept 7 (Reuters) - Court proceedings
for a Colorado couple accused of abusing three girls adopted
from Russia were postponed on Tuesday after a defense lawyer
told a judge that plea negotiations were under way.
Edelwina Leschinsky, 44, and her husband Steven Leschinsky,
43, were arrested in March after an investigation by child
welfare authorities in which the girls -- aged 12, 13 and 14 --
described being physically abused by their adoptive parents.
"We do anticipate a disposition (final settlement) in this
matter," Edelwina Leschinsky's lawyer Alex Garlin told Larimer
County District Court Judge Terence Gilmore during a brief
hearing.
The couple are charged with child abuse and contributing to
the delinquency of a minor. The girls have been removed from
the home.
The case has drawn media attention in Russia after a woman
in Tennessee put a 7-year-old boy she had adopted from Russia
on a plane back there, saying he had violent tendencies and
psychological problems.
According to a police affidavit, the girls, who were being
interviewed after the 12-year-old came to school with a black
eye, said the Leschinskys forced them to perform hundreds of
push-ups and sit-ups a day and to hold themselves over a board
with nails protruding from it.
The girls also told authorities their adoptive parents
spanked them with belts and pieces of wood and made them slap
each other in the face for punishment.
Prosecutors declined to discuss the case with reporters at
Tuesday's hearing.
"These are good, hard-working people who, with the purest
of intentions, adopted three Russian sisters," Garlin said in a
statement.
"Some extremely difficult adjustments for the children
caused great stress within the family, (and) parental
discipline occurred, but we disagree with various things
written in the police affidavit."
The next hearing in the case has been set for Oct. 7.
(Writing by Dan Whitcomb; Editing by Steve Gorman and John
O'Callaghan)


American couple allowed to adopt slow-learner Indian kid

American couple allowed to adopt slow-learner Indian kid


Mittwoch, 8. September 2010 11:10:55


by IANS ( Leave a comment )
New Delhi, Sep 8 (IANS) The Supreme Court Wednesday allowed an American couple to adopt a slow-learner child Anil after an expert committee of doctors told it that the prospective parents were eminently suitable for adoption.
The committee told the court that the adopting parents - Craig Lallen Coates and Cynthia Ann Coates - were financially and economically sound and the child would be extremely comfortable with them.
The committee was appointed following a suggestion by solicitor general and amicus curae Gopal Subramanium to the court in the course of the last hearing Aug 30.
It told the apex court bench of Justice Markandey Katju and Justice T.S. Thakur that the couple was fully aware of what the family was required to do for the upbringing of Anil.
It noted that Cynthia was suited for Anil’s upbringing as her husband Craig is also a slow-learner by birth. Cynthia, who knew about Craig’s slow-learning before marriage, took good care of him, the committee said.


More at : American couple allowed to adopt slow-learner Indian kid 
 
 

Pilot Project Helps Ethiopian Orphans Avoid Overseas Adoption

Pilot Project Helps Ethiopian Orphans Avoid Overseas Adoption


Peter Heinlein | Bantu, Ethiopia 07 September 2010


The Ethiopian government and a faith-based U.S. charity are teaming up on an experimental project to help orphans thrive in their home countries rather than be put up for adoption overseas. From the town of Bantu, our correspondent reports that the U.S. government is studying the project as Ethiopia becomes the nation of choice for American families seeking international adoptions.

Hundreds of Bantu's tiniest children stand in a muddy field at the Bright Hope Education Center, singing a welcome song to a team of foreign visitors led by U.S. Senator Mary Landrieu of Louisiana.

Three years ago, Bantu was little more than a collection of huts connected to the outside world by a footpath. Its population was decimated by drought and disease. Countless orphans were left to fend for themselves.

Today, many of these orphans attend classes and receive two meals a day at the newly built Bright Hope Education Center. The center is a joint project of the Ethiopian government and the Buckner Foundation, a Texas-based charity dedicated to helping children, and Ethiopia's Bright Hope Church.

Senator Landrieu has come to Bantu to look at how the project can be used as a model for reaching orphans and impoverished children worldwide.

"This is an example of an exciting partnership that is absolutely scalable," said Senator Mary Landrieu. "This road, electricity and compound was built within three years - extraordinary when you think about it. Over 600 children receiving education here, some of the poorest of the poor because this partnership between Ethiopia's government and a foundation, we would call it a charity, has brought private money from the U.S., matching the money from the government of Ethiopia creates an exciting opportunity."

Forty million Ethiopians, half the country's population, are less than 18 years of age. The United Nations Children's Fund estimates that 5.5 million of them are orphans, meaning that each has lost at least one parent.

The sheer number of orphans and Ethiopia's relatively lenient adoption standards help explain the rapid rise in the number of Ethiopian children being adopted in the West.

Five years ago, Ethiopia provided only two percent of foreign children adopted in the United States. By last year, that figure had jumped to 18 percent. Analysts say trends indicate that Ethiopia will surpass China this year as the number one country of origin for foreign adoptions by U.S. parents.

But the 5,000 Ethiopian children adopted worldwide last year is a tiny fraction of the country's 5.5 million orphans.

Senator Landrieu says the overwhelming numbers dictate caring for orphans near their birthplace, while international adoption should be a last resort.

"Not just Americans, but many countries around the world desire to follow this international treaty which says children should stay with their birth families," she said. "But if something happens and that child is separated from the mother or father - death or famine or disease - then the treaty says the children should be placed with the nearest kin or relative who is willing or responsible to raise them, and then as sort of the last step, rather than putting the child out on the street or putting the child in an institution where they're not loved and nurtured, to find a family somewhere in the world."

U.S. Ambassador Susan Jacobs, the State Department's adviser for children's issues, accompanied Landrieu to Bantu. At a time when many countries are tightening rules governing adoption, Jacobs says the Bantu model deserves a closer look because it helps Ethiopian orphans to better their lives at home, while identifying the neediest children for placement abroad.

"There are a lot of American families that want to adopt, that feel the need," said Susan Jacobs. "They want a family [or] to complete their family, so we hope adoptions will remain open all over the world and in Ethiopia."

Buckner Foundation President Kenneth Hall acknowledges the Bantu project reaches only a small percentage of Ethiopia's orphans, much less the estimated 140 million orphans worldwide. But he says he is excited about the possibilities of replicating the public-private partnership model internationally.

"When you look at it from the macro, or broad scale, it can be defeating," said Kenneth Hall. "But in the work I'm in, you've got to address the issue. We want to replicate models that work. The resources are available financially from the private sector in partnership with the public sector. That's how you get there. This is not that expensive to do when you partner with a lot of people and you let the national leadership, not only of the government, but [also] the private leaders here. So this is an Ethiopian project with just a little bit of assistance from America."

Pastor Getahun Nesibu Tesema, director of the Bright Hope Education Center says three orphans from Bantu have been adopted by U.S. families during the past three years. Almost all of the rest will remain with relatives in Ethiopia, with nutrition and education assistance from the Buckner Foundation and Bright Hope.

Orphanage: Succour to barren parents

Orphanage: Succour to barren parents

Written by Kunle Awosiyan Thursday, 09 September 2010

In this report by Kunle Awosiyan, infertile couples are no longer crying as adoption of children in orphanages becomes more attractive.

THE joy of every couple is to have a child at least. In this part of the world, it is mandatory for a wife to produce a baby for her husband even if he is not fertile. Many people, including some elite, still see a barren woman as victim of a particular curse or spell, irrespective of her medical fitness.While procreation is the key factor for marriage in this part of the world, it is not so in the Western world where couples may decide to adopt a child even when they are medically fit to produce their own.

To those who believe that couples must have children of their own, barrenness goes beyond biological calculations; it could be inflicted on any of the spouses for reasons best known to the evil doer. However, there had been cases where the barren had been made to give birth through orthodox or traditional medicine.

Boy caught up in clash of cultures over adoption

Boy caught up in clash of cultures over adoption

By MICHAEL FIELD - Stuff

Last updated 05:00 10/09/2010

Iqbal Sharif

IQBAL SHARIF: Wants the Pakistan-born child to live in New Zealand.

Relevant offers

An Auckland judge will decide the fate of a 16-month-old boy in a clash of cultures over international adoption.

Mohammad Huzaifa was born in Karachi in May last year. Two days later his birth parents gave him to their close friends, Pakistan-born New Zealand citizens Iqbal Sharif and Sara Sami, under an arrangement made before the birth.

The Pakistan Family Court has issued a Certificate of Guardianship, formally recognising the donation. But Immigration New Zealand will not give the child a visa.

Pakistan is governed by Islamic Sharia law, which does not recognise the concept of legal adoption – Mohammad has kept his birth father's name despite being given to the New Zealand couple.

The case's outcome hangs on a couple of words – guardianship versus adoption – and highlights the contrast between the laws of Islamic and secular states.

If the boy's adoptive parents are successful, it will be the first adoption between Pakistan and New Zealand.

Justice Christopher Allan heard the case in the High Court at Auckland yesterday and will give his judgment later.

Mr Sharif, through lawyer Evgeny Orlov, claims his Bill of Rights Act rights have been breached and asked Justice Allan for a declaration against the attorney-general.

In his affidavit, Mr Sharif said he and his wife had been married since 1994. Since then she had suffered several miscarriages and failed IVF treatment.

As their hopes of a child faded, a close friend promised them a child. Two days after he was born, the child was given to the couple and Mrs Sami has since been in Karachi with him, unable to come home. "Our family has been separated since this time and this has caused us an enormous amount of stress."

Mr Orlov told the court that the couple had wanted to "adopt a child from their own Muslim culture so they could bring up the child with its own belief systems and cultural values".

The couple's friends had "performed an act of great grace with considerable beneficial religious significance for them in giving up their child as a gift to their childless friends".

Both sides in the court accept the guardianship was honest and open, did not involve child trafficking, and did not come under the Hague Convention. "The real issue is over a word, and the word is adoption," Mr Orlov said.

Immigration NZ had failed to consider the rights and best interests of the child. New Zealand had "a case of tunnel vision" by not recognising Sharia law's view of a child's identity and guardianship, Mr Orlov said.

Ad Feedback <SCRIPT SRC="http://inl.adbureau.net/jnserver/acc_random=9033899666/site=s/area=s.stuff.national/aamsz=300x250/POS=STORYBODY/SOURCEDOMAIN=www.stuff.co.nz/KEYWORD=AUCKLAND+Affair+BIRTH+COURT+CULTURE+Citizenship+DEVELOPMENT+DONATION+FAMILYCOURT+GIFT+HIGHCOURT+HOME+INTERNATIONAL+IVF+ADOPTION/pageid=2466395795"></SCRIPT>

If Justice Allan rules that Sharia law on guardianship equates with New Zealand law on adoption, Immigration NZ will need to reconsider its refusal to grant a visa.

A Social Development Ministry spokesman said New Zealand did not have an adoption programme with Pakistan and, "as far as we know, Pakistan does not have adoption legislation".

An overseas guardianship order was not enough to allow Internal Affairs to grant a child New Zealand citizenship.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/4114463/Boy-caught-up-in-clash-of-cultures-over-adoption

By MICHAEL FIELD - Stuff

Last updated 05:00 10/09/2010

Share

Print

Adoption Suspension Leaves Children in Limbo

NEPAL
Adoption Suspension Leaves Children in Limbo
By Bhuwan Sharma

KATHMANDU, Sep 10, 2010 (IPS) - A big question marks looms over the future of many Nepali children in various child homes in the country in the wake of the suspension by 11 countries of their child adoption programmes for this Himalayan nation.

"Children will now have to remain in grim orphanages or may risk a worse fate by staying with families that don’t want them," says Philip Holmes, the adoptive father of two Nepali children and country director of Esther Benjamins Trust-Nepal, a U.K.-registered charity engaged in childcare and child protection and fighting child trafficking in Nepal. 

Some 400 Nepali children are adopted by foster parents each year from 44 institutional homes accredited by the country’s Ministry for Women, Children and Social Welfare. There is no data available on the number of Nepali children given up for adoption yearly. 

Besides orphans, Nepali law permits inter-country adoption for voluntarily committed children, who have been surrendered to a child welfare home, orphanage or Bal Mandir, a national children’s organisation, by either their guardians or parents. 

Problems ranging from fake documents, lack of transparency in handling funds and corruption in the adoption process, which have been reported over the years, have led to the latest round of adoption suspensions. 

Following similar allegations by recipient countries, the Nepali government suspended inter-country adoptions in May 2007, before lifting the self- imposed ban in January 2009. Intra-country adoptions were allowed to continue although local response to calls for adoption had always been very poor. 

Even after the 2007 suspension and its eventual lifting, adoption problems continued to plague the tiny kingdom in the eastern Himalayas. In February, The Hague Conference on Private International Law, an inter-governmental organisation, released a report roundly criticising Nepal’s adoption system, citing gross irregularities. 

In 2008, Nepal came up with the "Terms and Conditions and Process for Granting Approval for Adoption of Nepali Child by an Alien." These, however, were "not adequate as a legal framework to conduct inter-country adoptions," said the Hague Report. It added that Nepal’s refurbished laws still "fall short of Hague Convention standards." 

The report recommended "better regulations of children’s homes" and elimination of "financial gain from inter-country adoption." 

On Aug. 6, the U.S. government slapped a ban on inter-country adoptions from Nepal, citing the need "to protect the rights and interests of certain Nepali children and their families, and of U.S. prospective adoptive parents." Ten other countries – Canada, Denmark, Germany, France, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, Spain, Italy and Britain – had previously taken similar actions following the release of The Hague report. 

"A few bad apples are besmirching the image of the entire sector," says Sher Jung Karki, undersecretary of the Ministry of Women, Children and Social Welfare. 

"There are mainly two problems plaguing the sector: The documentation process is shoddy, which weakens the cases even of children who genuinely qualify for adoption," says Upendra Keshari Neupane, a member of the government’s Investigation, Recommendation and Monitoring Committee on inter-country adoption. 

"The second is the practise by some child centres of resorting to fake documents in order to put up even unqualified children for adoption," Neupane adds. Data reveals that foster parents prefer to adopt children who are younger than three years. 

"The primary problem is with the huge amount of money involved," says Holmes. "When one has to pay 8,000 U.S. dollars to adopt a Nepali child, of which 5,000 dollars goes to the child care centre, there are bound to be irregularities. In Nepal, 5,000 dollars is quite a big amount." 

"The adoption fee has to be brought down to curb irregularities," Holmes says, adding, "a blanket suspension is not the answer to the problem." 

But Karki points out that Nepal’s adoption fee is quite low compared to many other countries. Institutional homes, he says, need money to take care of many other children who remain in their care. 

Holmes believes the Nepali government should be given the benefit of the doubt, noting that there has been some progress since authorities reopened the sector in 2009. 

"When I adopted my first child in 2006, I was liaising directly with the child care centre, which is wrong," Holmes says. "But I got my second child in 2009 through the central allocation system. I filed an application in May and until September, when we finally brought him home, we were not allowed to meet him." 

According to Article 29 of the 1993 Hague Inter-country Adoption Convention, which Nepal signed in April 2009 but has yet to ratify, direct contact between the prospective adoptive parents and the biological parents or guardians is not permitted before verification of the suitability of the child and the prospective adoptive parents. 

Ministry of Women, Children and Social Welfare spokesperson Ram Prasad Bhattarai says, "more needs to be done but things are changing." 

Karki echoes Bhattarai’s observation. "Things are moving forward," says Karki. "We are working to nip the problem in the bud by developing a system whereby a child can be taken in by the institutional homes only after doing a thorough check of his or her background." 

"We are also trying to lay down stringent punishment for those trying to turn the industry into a money-making business," Karki adds. "Right now, we can do nothing other than delisting the centre from our list of centres accredited by the ministry for inter-country adoption." 

Neupane believes widespread poverty is also fuelling the irregularities. Poor parents have been found colluding with institutional homes to make it appear their children are orphans, he says. 

"Sometimes they do it in the hope that their child will have a better future while at other times, acute poverty forces them to do this for some money," Neupane says.
 
 

Kari Haege of Hastings assists residents of Liberia

Kari Haege of Hastings assists residents of Liberia

When Kari Haege of Hastings went to Liberia in April as part of the adoption process for two children, she did not expect to be impacted as much as she was. The trip has changed her life.

By: Jane Lightbourn, The Hastings Star-Gazette

Previous Next

view all offers | sign up for email offers | add your business