Home  

Adoption defects

Description

Our project

200,000 is the number of Korean children who have been adopted since the end of the Korean War in 1953. For several years now, the voices of Korean adoptees around the world have been heard and their testimonies agree to paint a picture of a flawed international adoption system . Between demands and recognition of illegal procedures, Korean adoptees are now demanding compensation from the responsible states.    

 

Among these states, Belgium. Despite its small size, our country has welcomed nearly 3,700 Korean adoptees , which ranks it 7th in the world in terms of the number of Korean children welcomed. This relatively high number of adoptions obviously raises questions: in what circumstances did they take place? To what extent was the Belgian government aware of what was happening on its soil, and what is its responsibility for the scale of the phenomenon? 

Adopted Chinese children return to trace their origins

Over 82,000 children born in China have been adopted by American families since 1999, according to State Department figures — mostly girls, owing to a Chinese cultural preference for boys

AFP

People read a flyer bearing Loulee Wilson’s photographs distributed in the hope of finding her biological parents in Dianjiang, China. | Photo Credit: AFP

At an empty concrete lot in southwest China, Loulee Wilson scoops a handful of stones into a bag — a memento from the site where she believes she was abandoned as a baby.

2009 Adoption Policy Conference

2009 Adoption Policy Conference

International Adoption, the United States and the Reality of the Hague System

presented by The Center for Adoption Policy,
The Child Advocacy Program of Harvard Law School, and
The Justice Action Center at New York Law School

Friday, March 6, 2009
New York Law School
Wellington Conference Center

This conference will address all aspects of international adoption to and from the United States, one year after the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption became effective in the United States.

SCHEDULE OF EVENTS

9:30 a.m. - 9:40 a.m.
Welcome
Diane B. Kunz, Executive Director, Center for Adoption Policy
Elizabeth Bartholet, Professor, Harvard Law School;  Director, Child Advocacy Program, Harvard Law School

FT investigation finds Ukrainian children on Russian adoption sites

Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found here
https://www.ft.com/content/2d0013d2-a407-449f-b1e2-3d14fe65188f

Ukrainian children who were abducted and taken to Russia in the early months of the Kremlin’s 2022 invasion have been put up for adoption by authorities, in one case under a false Russian identity, a Financial Times investigation has found. Using image recognition tools and public records, as well as interviews with Ukrainian officials and the children’s relatives, the FT identified and located four Ukrainian children on the Russian government-linked adoption website usynovite.ru. One Must-Read This article was featured in the One Must-Read newsletter, where we recommend one remarkable story each weekday. Sign up for the newsletter here The findings add to the mounting body of evidence that the International Criminal Court, Ukrainian government officials and legal experts say point to alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by Russia. One of the children is shown with a new Russian name and age that differs from their Ukrainian government-issued documents. Another child is shown using a Russian version of their Ukrainian name. There is no mention of the Ukrainian background of any of the children. The children were abducted from state care homes and separated from their guardians and relatives in towns across the southern and eastern regions of Ukraine that fell under the control of Russia’s invading army in 2022. They range in age from eight to 15-years-old. The children traced by the FT and whose identities were confirmed with their families by the Ukrainian authorities have ended up in the Tula region near Moscow and in the Orenburg region close to the Kazakh border. One of the children was taken to occupied Crimea. Seventeen additional matches identified by the FT on the adoption website were confirmed as Ukrainian children in a recent New York Times investigation, all of them from a children’s home in Kherson. The ICC has issued arrest warrants for Russia’s President Vladimir Putin and Commissioner for Children’s Rights Maria Lvova-Belova, saying they bear criminal responsibility for the war crime of unlawful deportation of the children. The Kremlin did not respond to requests for comment about the FT’s findings. It has objected to the warrants, denied abducting children and tried to justify its actions by claiming it was done for their protection despite an abundance of evidence to the contrary. A defiant Putin has signed decrees making it possible to fast-track Russian citizenship for Ukrainian children taken to Russia. RESUME Show video description A video posted by Maria Lvova-Belova's Telegram account in July 2022 shows her with Ukrainian children from the Donbas, Ukraine. The post says they are to be adopted in the Russian region of Tula. These are not missing children identified by the FT. © @malvovabelova/Telegram Ukrainian authorities estimate nearly 20,000 children have been forcibly taken from occupied territories to Russia since its full-scale invasion began in February 2022; many thousands are still missing. The parents and relatives of the four children located by the FT declined to speak about their situation in detail, citing concerns that Moscow would thwart their return home. But other families whose children have been forcibly taken to Russia and returned to Ukraine recounted harrowing experiences during their time in the country. Moscow has allowed some children to return to Ukraine if their relatives or guardians come to Russia to collect them. They described the children being coerced to watch and recite Kremlin propaganda; being held against their will; not being allowed to contact relatives; and being forced to take Russian identities. Many described verbal and physical abuse by Russian children and some caregivers. “I was heartbroken,” said Svitlana Popova, mother of 15-year-old Alina Kovaleva, who was abducted by a group of Russian soldiers in the occupied Kherson region. Her daughter’s captors “had a new birth certificate forged to say that Alina was born in Russia”, she said in Kyiv after returning with her daughter. “And adoption papers. [They] were going to make my daughter their own.” Wayne Jordash, president of Global Rights Compliance, an international humanitarian law firm, said forcibly transferring or deporting children are war crimes. “However, when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack on a civilian population as Russia’s attack on Ukraine undoubtedly is, they are also crimes against humanity,” he said. “Changing [children’s] identity and putting them up for adoption only confirms the necessary criminal intent.” The FT confirmed the children’s identities with the help of the Ukrainian Child Rights Protection Centre (CRPC), a state body. The centre is awaiting further confirmation on two more children located by the FT who they strongly believe are Ukrainian. The children’s guardians and Ukraine’s authorities had previously been unaware of the children’s whereabouts. The FT identified the kidnapped children by comparing photographs from an official database of missing Ukrainian children with public profiles of children up for adoption in Russia using an image recognition tool. Reporters reviewed potential matches manually to select those likely to be a true match. The false names and ages the children had been given meant it would have been challenging to find them in other ways. High probability matches were shared with the CRPC, which contacted the children’s relatives and guardians to confirm each missing Ukrainian child. Dmytro Lubinets, the Ukrainian parliament commissioner for human rights whose office oversees the CRPC and helped the FT with the identifications, called Russia’s removal of Ukrainian children “premeditated”. Ukrainian officials shared with the FT Russian government documents that show the Kremlin had devised plans ahead of its invasion to forcibly deport Ukrainian children to Russia as part of a so-called “filtration” process. “They had a well-planned genocide policy towards us,” said Daria Herasymchuk, an adviser and commissioner of the president of Ukraine for children’s rights. “They committed a crime, they kidnapped children in large quantities.” It is a struggle for Ukraine’s government, the country’s charities and the children’s relatives and guardians to return the children. It often takes many months to track them down and several weeks or more to plan how to reach them. The journey is roughly 4,000 miles round-trip, winding from Ukraine through the EU and then into Russia, where relatives and guardians face hours-long interrogations by the FSB, and then back. As of June 11, Ukraine has managed to return at least 389 children from Russia, according to the president’s office. The office of Ukraine’s human rights commissioner and the CRPC are attempting to confirm the identities of dozens more Ukrainian children taken to Russia who were flagged to them by the FT. The CRPC is working with a relative of one of the children identified and located by the FT to return them home to Ukraine. Visual investigations team: Peter Andringa, Chris Campbell, Sam Learner and Sam Joiner. Additional reporting by Anastasia Stognei in Tbilisi.

The Netherlands will no longer allow international adoptions

https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/seneste/holland-vil-ikke-laengere-tillade-internationale-adoptioner?fbclid=IwY2xjawC6gORleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHWdQ7dxpwgAQl8VD9b2uxqH30QGeOoMyKrDi7VoqKS6cP-67NMa2JY1sAA_aem_AUqrR_Z1_o_gU5mu5uhoc6u3ml5DfjCLZKhdxRk5eWqZ_jz-F3Fr4A3xyddcRPr7BTfrb4GDCMGEChz62VXge0Xx

It must not be possible for Dutch citizens to adopt children from abroad. This is announced by a Dutch minister, writes Reuters.

Dutch adoption procedures have come under scrutiny after a growing number of adult adoptees began investigating their roots. Here, several people discovered that their birth documents had been falsified or that their adoption had been illegal.

Dutch parents have adopted around 40,000 children from many different countries in the past 50 years.

In Denmark, it is currently not possible to adopt foreign children, after Danish International Adoption (DIA), which as the only organization in Denmark mediates international adoptions, stopped that work in January .

NAAM Day 9: A Brief Memoir: Bill Pierce, Me, and AdoptaTalk with God

Some of you might remember Bill Pierce, the first president of the National Council for Adoption. Bill did not invent sealed records and other wild and weird adoption ideologies, but he facilitated and cemented them into the minds of politicians and the public starting in 1980 when he signed on to NCFA. (Although he was a former vice president of CWLA, he told me that until NCFA he didn’t know squat about adoption. He just needed a job.) This particular job was financed by the Gladney Center for Adoption with the help of a Texas Oil Depletion windfall. Its specific goals were  to(1) keep OBC and records sealed and (2) promote adoption.  He became such a hardcore beltway SOB that John McCain once personally physically booted him out of his Senate office. The naive believed that once Bill retired or died our problems would be over, which, of course, was not true. Sealed records had become the default rule of both adoption law and adoptee lived experience in the US and still is, despite our inroads.

When pariahs meet. Capital University Law School, November 2, 2002. Between us we annoyed liberal do-gooders and social workers in spandex and were banished from their island.

Some may also remember that I had what was considered by many as a bonkers relationship with Bill.

A few months before he retired from NCFA I began to receive emails from someone claiming to be a priest in Latrobe, Pennsylvania, who wanted to talk about adoption. It was Bill, of course. (In case you didn’t know, Bill, this is SO Bill!) Shortly after that, someone claiming to be an adoption professional or something in England joined alt adoption, “the meanest newsgroup on the web,” the site of Bastard Nation’s birth, and where all the bad adoptees hung out online.  “She” lasted several weeks until during some batty discussion about clotted cream  (seriously!) accidentally outed “herself” as Bill. With Bill out of the bag, the game was afoot.  We welcomed him with suspicious but open arms. Maybe he was lonely.  He loved being part of our show. He was fun. Actually fun!  And he was a good debater, with a good vocabulary, unlike some of our “members” who liked to say dumb things like claiming that BN was a pagan cult that burned stick figures on the beach.  He didn’t suffer fools, and often the fools that landed on alt adoption got it from both him and us.

Australian Securities and Investments Commission's

Australian Securities and Investments Commission's

'The state was more active than we knew': The Foreign Service pushed to have children adopted to Denmark

In Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, South Korea and Lebanon, Danish embassies were involved in adoption cases, DR reveals in a new podcast.

 


In the 1970s and 1980s, Danish embassies and consulates around the world controversially helped adoption agencies complete adoptions of foreign children to Denmark.

Earlier today, DR reported how the Danish Foreign Service in the 1980s was involved in adoptions from Lebanon, which, according to experts, were completed through bribery and child trafficking.

But it's not just Lebanon that the state has been involved. The new podcast series 'Falske Minder' reveals that, according to experts, the Danish Foreign Service assisted the agencies with adoptions from Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and South Korea.

Inquiry Committee: Strong criticism of Norwegian adoptions

The Adoption Committee criticizes both the Norwegian authorities and the Adoption Forum association for adoptions from Ecuador and Colombia.

 

For one year, the adoption committee has been investigating foreign adoptions to Norway.

The committee's task is to determine whether Norwegian authorities have had sufficient control over international adoptions and to uncover whether illegal adoptions to Norway have occurred.

– We take what we have found seriously, said committee leader Camilla Bernt when she handed over the report to Minister of Children and Family Affairs Kjersti Toppe (Sp).