Home  

What oversight did Camillus woman accused of abuse have after adopting her children?

A Camillus mother who is accused of abusing her 11-year-old child was a foster mom who adopted two children, CNY Central has learned.

44-year-old Susan Orendorf was arrested Tuesday morning and is accused of abusing her 11-year-old boy, possibly for years.

The Onondaga County Sheriff's Office said Orendorf handcuffed her adopted son to his bed, denied him food, forcibly touched him, and even strangled him.

Orendorf first fostered, then adopted the 11-year-old, as well as a 6-year-old girl, according to the Sheriff’s Office.

During the fostering process, a foster agency is involved in checking on the children.

Recommendations for* child welfare care reform in the global south: Perspectives of 542 adults who were separated from parental care during childhood in 12 nations

Abstract

A robust literature has outlined the risks to children separated from parental care. Recently, there has been an effort to reform services to this population. However, the research driving reform has often neglected the voices of adults with care experience, especially those from the Global South. The current research explored recommendations for care reform from 542 adults who had experienced alternative care during childhood in 12 nations in the Global South. Data revealed three themes to improve care: (1) child focus and participation, (2) the need for family placements, and (3) the importance of support services. Implications are discussed.

INTRODUCTION

Globally, millions of children and youth are separated from biological parental care during childhood for a variety of reasons, including poverty, parental death and maltreatment (Desmond et al., 2020; Wilke et al., 2022). During these separations, children often reside in alternative care settings, which may include residential care centres, kinship care or foster care (Martin & Zulaika, 2016). Long-term outcomes for children and youth separated from parental care are often poor (McGuire et al., 2021), particularly for children in residential care (van IJzendoorn et al., 2020). As such, researchers (Berens & Nelson, 2015; Dozier et al., 2014) and policy-makers (United Nations General Assembly, 2019) have called for care reform to improve services for this highly vulnerable population.

However, little of this work has considered the voices of adults who resided in alternative care settings during childhood in a systematic way (Dixon et al., 2019; Hartworth et al., 2021). Adults with alternative care experience can provide important and unique insight into the needs of children currently in care and how services could be improved (Dixon et al., 2019; Hartworth et al., 2021). Furthermore, it offers individuals with care experience the opportunity to influence research, practice and policy based on their knowledge and experience (Harder et al., 2020). The research that does exist has primarily been conducted in nations in the Global North (Roche & Flynn, 2020). Due to disparity in resources and differences in care systems, the results of these studies may not generalise to the Global South (van Breda et al., 2020). The current study surveyed adults who had experienced alternative care during childhood in nations in the Global South about their thoughts, beliefs and recommendations regarding care reform and services in alternative care settings.

Orphan. Mother's love under conditions

At the age of five, Myranda was adopted from South Korea and ended up in the Netherlands, in a dysfunctional family. With a mother who was regularly hospitalized and a father who was often absent, Myranda grew up in a tense home environment. She decided to write down her story and published her book on September 24, entitled: Wees. Motherly love subject to conditions. In the Night of EO she shares her story and experiences.

Cabinet Hahn (HR) to Dieu Merci Kitambo: Piria, private issue

---------- Forwarded message ---------

De : CAB HAHN CONTACT

Date: mer. 21 sept. 2022 à 08:51

Subject: RE: Préoccupations - Ares(2022)6511561

To: Dieu Merci Kitambo

Anxious parents seek clarity over status of adoption cases, govt says DM's will prioritise pending court cases on transfer

NEW DELH: Nandini (name changed) and her husband had registered with the Central Adoption Resource Authority in 2018. After a long wait to be matched with a child, the Pune based couple was finally able to bring their 6 - month old daughter home as foster parents in April 2021. The child turns 2 later this week but the parents are yet to get the adoption order with the court where her matter was listed on the 12th of this month for a hearing getting deferred to September 30 and parents concerned over what lies ahead as new rules notified by the central government on September 1 sought immediate transfer of all pending cases in courts to the district magistrate.

Incidentally, amid rising worries of parents, on September 12 the ministry of women and child development wrote to all states to direct the concerned authorities to transfer all cases from the courts to the DM to prevent any further delay in passing of adoption orders. This was in keeping with the notification of the Juvenile Justice Model (Amendment) Rules 2022 that came into effect on September 1. There are over 900 cases estimated to be pending in Courts at different stages of hearing across the country.

Going by the rules the DM will have to dispose of an application for making an adoption order within a period of two months. However, the adoption regulations that will lay out the process are yet to be notified. According to the ministry of women and child development the notification will happen this week.

With September 30 as the next date of hearing listed in the court, an anxious Nandini for now is clueless about the fate of her case. She wrote to the concerned authorities dealing with adoptions on September 13. She is still awaiting a response to her mails. “I am emotionally drained.. I will be celebrating my daughter’s second birthday this week but her grandmother who lives in another city has yet to see her as rules do not allow me to take her out of the city I live in till the adoption is complete,” Nandini said.

Nandini's case reflects the dilemma of parents whose cases are at an advanced stage in court and who are seeking clarity on if and when the court will transfer their case to the district magistrate and how quickly will the latter take it up. The fear of further delay due to the administrative process of transfer of cases and then in passage of adoption orders is worrying parents like Nandini.

Woo request regarding reactions after publication of the Joustra Committee report on intercountry adoption

Woo request regarding reactions after publication of the Joustra Committee report on intercountry adoption

Raising the child in another family: foster care or adoption

After the birth, parents may decide not to take care of the child themselves, because they see no possibilities to do so. They are given time to consider whether or not to give up the child. The child is then first cared for in a temporary foster family.

Step-by-step

What happens after the intention not to take care of the child yourself?

Collapse overview

Steps

Parents Petri | Madras High Court upholds 224-year-old jurisdiction to hear guardianship, child custody cases

The Madras High Court upheld the 224-year-old jurisdiction; The five-judge bench, by a 3:2 majority, rules that the underlying jurisdiction cannot be superseded by the Family Courts Act 1984.

The Madras High Court upheld the 224-year-old jurisdiction; The five-judge bench, by a 3:2 majority, rules that the underlying jurisdiction cannot be superseded by the Family Courts Act 1984.

It is not often that the Madras High Court constitutes a five-judge bench. One such bench was set up this year to answer an important question of law – whether guardianship and child custody petitions should be filed only before family courts or even in the Madras High Court, with respect to its underlying parents. Can be filed by applying jurisdiction. Minor?

Justice PN Prakash, R. Mahadevan, M. Sundar, N. Anand Venkatesh and A.A. Nakkiran heard marathon arguments for months by a battery of lawyers, with a section arguing in favor of concurrent jurisdiction by the High Court as well as the Family Courts. and the other argued that after the enactment of the Family Courts Act, 1984 the jurisdiction of the High Court has ceased to exist.

Given the complex nature of the dispute due to parental jurisdiction that has been going on for more than 224 years, the five-judge bench’s ruling was not unanimous. Instead, it upheld the argument in favor of concurrent jurisdiction by a 3:2 majority and ruled that the High Court can exercise jurisdiction not only with respect to children residing within the city of Chennai but across the state.

AMAR ICF HELD A FIVE-DAY SUMMER SCHOOL FOR ROMANIAN AND UKRAINIAN CHILDREN.

AMAR ICF held a five-day summer school for Romanian special needs children and Ukrainian refugee

children. A significant goal of the camp was to help these children make friends as they enjoyed

learning new things together. “We mixed the children together so the newcomers [the refugees] could

make new friends as we feel they will be away from home for quite a while,” said AMAR ICF president

Baroness Nicholson.

'100 years of injustice': Survivors call for mother and baby home redress scheme to be extended

SURVIVORS OF MOTHER and baby homes and other institutions have called for the Government’s redress scheme to be extended to include all people who spent time in the system.

Several survivors and campaigners held a protest outside Leinster House in Dublin this afternoon.

In recent months there has been much criticism of the fact the planned scheme excludes people who were boarded out, a precursor to fostering, and those who spent less than six months in an institution as a child.

The United Nations Human Rights Committee and the Oireachtas Children’s Committee are among the high-profile groups calling for the scheme to be extended.

People who receive redress under the scheme will also have to sign a waiver saying they will not take future legal action against the State.