Home  

FEATURE: New families sought for children with disabilities via adoption

NARA - Each year in Japan there are over 200,000 abortions. Every two weeks, a newborn infant dies of abandonment. And each year, more than 50 children lose their lives to physical abuse at the hands of their parents.

This is according to the nonprofit Migiwa, based in Nara Prefecture, western Japan.

Migiwa's mission is to protect unwanted babies, acting as a mediator to help place them with new families through plenary adoption. Such cases often involve birth mothers choosing to give up their right to raise their child with a disability such as Down syndrome.

Although the health ministry has offered a lower estimate of roughly 122,000 abortions occurring in fiscal 2022, organizations such as NPO Florence say that one newborn baby dies every two weeks in Japan due to abuse and neglect or from being abandoned in parks and other public spaces.

The Japan Network for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect also reports more than 50 deaths due to abuse occurring each year, meaning one child loses his or her life every week.

FEATURE: New families sought for children with disabilities via adoption

NARA - Each year in Japan there are over 200,000 abortions. Every two weeks, a newborn infant dies of abandonment. And each year, more than 50 children lose their lives to physical abuse at the hands of their parents.

This is according to the nonprofit Migiwa, based in Nara Prefecture, western Japan.

Migiwa's mission is to protect unwanted babies, acting as a mediator to help place them with new families through plenary adoption. Such cases often involve birth mothers choosing to give up their right to raise their child with a disability such as Down syndrome.

Although the health ministry has offered a lower estimate of roughly 122,000 abortions occurring in fiscal 2022, organizations such as NPO Florence say that one newborn baby dies every two weeks in Japan due to abuse and neglect or from being abandoned in parks and other public spaces.

The Japan Network for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect also reports more than 50 deaths due to abuse occurring each year, meaning one child loses his or her life every week.

Reply from ambassador EU to Dieu Merci - Complaint European Ombudsman

---------- Forwarded message ---------

From: ACT

Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 at 13:30

Subject: Fwd: reply from ambassador

To:

Mail Jaap Doek - R. Post - UN Committee asking Romania to lift moratorium

jaapedoek@

 to me

show details 04/07/2009 

Beste Roelie, met mij alles goed. Zit nu even in Cairo (dus let niet op
merkwaardige email address je ziet; komt van gebruik internet)
Het zou mij hogelijk verbazen als dat bericht juist is, maar ik zit niet
meer in het comite in Geneva. Als Roemenie net (in de mei sessie ) bij het
comite is geweest dan kun je het op de website van het comite checken
(www.ohchr.or en click op human rights bodies en je krijgt toegang tot de
website van het comite)

Original Message:
-----------------
From: Roelie Post roelie.post@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 22:16:35 +0200
To: JaapEDoek@cs.com
Subject: is dit waar?


Dag Jaap, alweer een tijdje geleden dat we contact hadden.

Ben benieuwd of onderstaand bericht op juistheid berust.

Beste groeten,

Roelie



*July 2, 2009. Romanian Newspaper Reporting that the UN Commission
Recommends that Romania Reopen International Adoption. *We are delighted, if
surprised, to read in Ultima Ora that the United Nations Commission for
Children's Rights has recommended to Romania's National Authority for the
Protection of the Rights of the Child that Romania end its moratorium on
international adoption as well as "accelerate the procedures for national
adoptions." International pressure from the European Union as well as some
UNICEF sources had led Romania to close its international adoption programs
in 2004. The glaring failure of foster care programs to provide permanency
for unparented children in Romania has been a tragedy for the most
vulnerable in society, as it always is. We hope these recommendations will
soon become reality.


--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web.com â€“ Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft®
Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail


 

Reply  Forward    

Reply

JCICS Board Meeting

International Symposium Proposal:
Proposal #1: JCICS participation in the 2005 Conference on Children without Parental Care
Proposal #2: JCICS participation in the 2005 Conference on Children without Parental Care in the amount of $10,000.
Background: In 2004, International Advocates for Children (IAC) sponsored an international conference in Atlanta, Georgia. The event was fully funded in the amount of $60,000 by AMREX. Participants included 17 countries and NGO’s from Europe and the United States.
The second conference is planned for November 2005. Sponsors for this year’s event include: University of Mass, Focus on Adoption (FOA), IAC and Center for Adoption Research. Speakers will include Jakob Doek, Chairman of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, Sarah Dillon Phd., Elizabeth Bartholet Phd. among others including sending countries and sponsor representatives.
Rationale: Benefits to JCICS
Benefits to All
Considerations:
- Association with groups/individuals that do not have 100% agreement with JCICS positions as noted in the recently approved White Paper.
- Specific individuals and organizations upon whom JCICS is reliant, have expressed concern over JCICS involvement with certain co-sponsors.
Further Description:
T. DiFilipo
o
Demonstrates to decision makers JCICS’s leadership on child welfare issues.
o
Positions JCICS as a proactive advocacy group.
o
Provides opportunity to develop relationships with sending countries and others of influence with little human, man-hour or capital expenditures. [The cost of travel to all sending countries would run into the ten’s of thousands.]
o
Provides a world stage for JCICS advocacy on issues of concern.
o
Fulfills the JCICS goal of sponsoring an international symposium.
o
Provides a setting where peoples of divergent opinions, practices and process can openly share issues, concerns and solutions.
o
Provides the opportunity to create working relationships amongst the key layers in international child welfare.
o
Facilitates networking amongst child welfare professionals. [Prof. Elizabeth Bartholet, Harvard Law and Jakob Doek, UN Committee Chair held opposing positions until sitting on a panel at last year’s conference. Since then they have collaborated on two projects.]
o
Places children at the focus of key decision makers.
World Conference on Children without Parental Care
Understanding and Enforcing their Human Rights
Purpose: Facilitate an active, open and continuing exchange of ideas, concerns, issues, best practices, and solutions related to the best interest of children without parental care.
Method: 3-day conference in Boston, Massachusetts USA in November 2005 targeting participation of 200+ Government Representatives, Central Adoption Authorities, Social Service Providers, International NGO’s
Invite entities representing divergent cultures, practices and beliefs in an effort to dampen predetermined outcomes
Encourage ‘best evidence’ presentations from non-vested entities and academia
Planning:
1) Targeted Sponsors
a) Center for Adoption Policy
b) Center for Adoption Research (
c) Evan B. Donaldson Institute
d) Focus on Adoption (
e) Joint Council on International Children’s Services
f) International Advocates for Children (
g) National Council for Adoption
h) University of Massachusetts (
2) Targeted Speakers
a) UN Committee on the Rights of the Child – Jakob Doek
b) UNICEF
c) Hague Permanent Committee
d) Central Authorities
i. China
ii. Russia
e) CCAI
f) Academics
g) Sponsors
3) Workshop Topics
a) Structured Decision-making Principles to Serve the Best Interest of the Child
b) The Role of Agencies in Finding Permanent Placement Options for Children in Need
c) Reunification of Child to Biological Family
d) The Responsibility of Government to Children of Refugees and Street Children
e) Establishing a System of Checks and Balances in Child Policy
f) The Role of Receiving Countries in Intercountry Adoption
g) Psychological and Physical State of Institutionalized Children
4) Panel Discussions
Panel discussions and questions will be held between workshops with multiple experts from different fields in order to achieve a comprehensive perspective on issues. Attendees will be
invited to present on specific issues and questions relating to their individual governments and to share best practices.
Pros
Matches what JCICS wanted to do with own symposium
Furthers JCICS mission
Cost of $10,000
Puts us as co-sponsor with reputable organizations
Opportunity to speak, help set the agenda
Networking possibilities
Inroads with UNICEF
Possibly 19 countries represented
Cons
Cost of $10,000
Negative perception of some co-sponsors
Not a direct benefit to our members
Concerns: Negative reaction of JCICS members
Questions: Should JCICS still hold its own symposium, and if so, should JCICS network with other organizations?
Options
Do nothing
Raise $ on our own
Make our own alliance with other organizations
Join this one
Agreed to Sponsor) Agreed to Sponsor) Agreed to Sponsor) Agreed to Sponsor)
MOTION: For JCICS to co-sponsor the IAC Symposium.
K. Wallace MOVED/ L. Wetterberg SECONDED TIED 4-4, 2 abstentions
Further discussion was held regarding whether or not JCICS should co-sponsor the IAC symposium. Those in favor of the idea felt that it would give JCICS the opportunity to lead and to network with UNICEF and foreign officials in a cost effective way. Those concerned about participating felt that JCICS’ relationship with U.S. government officials and JCICS members might be compromised due to existing perceptions regarding some of the existing sponsors. It was generally agreed upon that there might be a more level playing field if other organizations with similar values and beliefs would also agree to be sponsors. Tom will do further investigation and report back to the board.

How Bartholet influenced Jaap Doek


IAC Conference 2004 - Jaap Doek & Bartholet together in panel:


FOCUS ON ADOPTION: Conference: “In the Best Interests of Children: A Permanent Family” Guatemala City, Guatemala – Jan 20-21, ’05
Elizabeth Bartholet:1 Keynote, Jan 20, ‘05: “Defining the Best Interests of the Child”: 


Here it’s important to note that Jakob Doek, Chair of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, took a major step forward in announcing at the end of a recent conference that: “The institution is the worst possible option for an orphaned or abandoned child, thus other options, such as foster care, domestic adoption and international adoption, must be considered simultaneously


  Quote from JCICS Board Meeting 16/06/2005 (attached), when discussing the benefits/need to participate at IAC Conference:

"Prof. Elizabeth Bartholet, Harvard Law and Jakob Doek, UN Committee Chair held opposing positions until sitting on a panel at last year’s conference. Since then they have collaborated on two projects."

BULLETIN 6 COMMITTEE INVESTIGATION IN DOMESTIC REMOVAL AND ADOPTION

BULLETIN 6 COMMITTEE INVESTIGATION IN DOMESTIC REMOVAL AND ADOPTION