Home  

JCICS Board Meeting

International Symposium Proposal:
Proposal #1: JCICS participation in the 2005 Conference on Children without Parental Care
Proposal #2: JCICS participation in the 2005 Conference on Children without Parental Care in the amount of $10,000.
Background: In 2004, International Advocates for Children (IAC) sponsored an international conference in Atlanta, Georgia. The event was fully funded in the amount of $60,000 by AMREX. Participants included 17 countries and NGO’s from Europe and the United States.
The second conference is planned for November 2005. Sponsors for this year’s event include: University of Mass, Focus on Adoption (FOA), IAC and Center for Adoption Research. Speakers will include Jakob Doek, Chairman of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, Sarah Dillon Phd., Elizabeth Bartholet Phd. among others including sending countries and sponsor representatives.
Rationale: Benefits to JCICS
Benefits to All
Considerations:
- Association with groups/individuals that do not have 100% agreement with JCICS positions as noted in the recently approved White Paper.
- Specific individuals and organizations upon whom JCICS is reliant, have expressed concern over JCICS involvement with certain co-sponsors.
Further Description:
T. DiFilipo
o
Demonstrates to decision makers JCICS’s leadership on child welfare issues.
o
Positions JCICS as a proactive advocacy group.
o
Provides opportunity to develop relationships with sending countries and others of influence with little human, man-hour or capital expenditures. [The cost of travel to all sending countries would run into the ten’s of thousands.]
o
Provides a world stage for JCICS advocacy on issues of concern.
o
Fulfills the JCICS goal of sponsoring an international symposium.
o
Provides a setting where peoples of divergent opinions, practices and process can openly share issues, concerns and solutions.
o
Provides the opportunity to create working relationships amongst the key layers in international child welfare.
o
Facilitates networking amongst child welfare professionals. [Prof. Elizabeth Bartholet, Harvard Law and Jakob Doek, UN Committee Chair held opposing positions until sitting on a panel at last year’s conference. Since then they have collaborated on two projects.]
o
Places children at the focus of key decision makers.
World Conference on Children without Parental Care
Understanding and Enforcing their Human Rights
Purpose: Facilitate an active, open and continuing exchange of ideas, concerns, issues, best practices, and solutions related to the best interest of children without parental care.
Method: 3-day conference in Boston, Massachusetts USA in November 2005 targeting participation of 200+ Government Representatives, Central Adoption Authorities, Social Service Providers, International NGO’s
Invite entities representing divergent cultures, practices and beliefs in an effort to dampen predetermined outcomes
Encourage ‘best evidence’ presentations from non-vested entities and academia
Planning:
1) Targeted Sponsors
a) Center for Adoption Policy
b) Center for Adoption Research (
c) Evan B. Donaldson Institute
d) Focus on Adoption (
e) Joint Council on International Children’s Services
f) International Advocates for Children (
g) National Council for Adoption
h) University of Massachusetts (
2) Targeted Speakers
a) UN Committee on the Rights of the Child – Jakob Doek
b) UNICEF
c) Hague Permanent Committee
d) Central Authorities
i. China
ii. Russia
e) CCAI
f) Academics
g) Sponsors
3) Workshop Topics
a) Structured Decision-making Principles to Serve the Best Interest of the Child
b) The Role of Agencies in Finding Permanent Placement Options for Children in Need
c) Reunification of Child to Biological Family
d) The Responsibility of Government to Children of Refugees and Street Children
e) Establishing a System of Checks and Balances in Child Policy
f) The Role of Receiving Countries in Intercountry Adoption
g) Psychological and Physical State of Institutionalized Children
4) Panel Discussions
Panel discussions and questions will be held between workshops with multiple experts from different fields in order to achieve a comprehensive perspective on issues. Attendees will be
invited to present on specific issues and questions relating to their individual governments and to share best practices.
Pros
Matches what JCICS wanted to do with own symposium
Furthers JCICS mission
Cost of $10,000
Puts us as co-sponsor with reputable organizations
Opportunity to speak, help set the agenda
Networking possibilities
Inroads with UNICEF
Possibly 19 countries represented
Cons
Cost of $10,000
Negative perception of some co-sponsors
Not a direct benefit to our members
Concerns: Negative reaction of JCICS members
Questions: Should JCICS still hold its own symposium, and if so, should JCICS network with other organizations?
Options
Do nothing
Raise $ on our own
Make our own alliance with other organizations
Join this one
Agreed to Sponsor) Agreed to Sponsor) Agreed to Sponsor) Agreed to Sponsor)
MOTION: For JCICS to co-sponsor the IAC Symposium.
K. Wallace MOVED/ L. Wetterberg SECONDED TIED 4-4, 2 abstentions
Further discussion was held regarding whether or not JCICS should co-sponsor the IAC symposium. Those in favor of the idea felt that it would give JCICS the opportunity to lead and to network with UNICEF and foreign officials in a cost effective way. Those concerned about participating felt that JCICS’ relationship with U.S. government officials and JCICS members might be compromised due to existing perceptions regarding some of the existing sponsors. It was generally agreed upon that there might be a more level playing field if other organizations with similar values and beliefs would also agree to be sponsors. Tom will do further investigation and report back to the board.

How Bartholet influenced Jaap Doek


IAC Conference 2004 - Jaap Doek & Bartholet together in panel:


FOCUS ON ADOPTION: Conference: “In the Best Interests of Children: A Permanent Family” Guatemala City, Guatemala – Jan 20-21, ’05
Elizabeth Bartholet:1 Keynote, Jan 20, ‘05: “Defining the Best Interests of the Child”: 


Here it’s important to note that Jakob Doek, Chair of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, took a major step forward in announcing at the end of a recent conference that: “The institution is the worst possible option for an orphaned or abandoned child, thus other options, such as foster care, domestic adoption and international adoption, must be considered simultaneously


  Quote from JCICS Board Meeting 16/06/2005 (attached), when discussing the benefits/need to participate at IAC Conference:

"Prof. Elizabeth Bartholet, Harvard Law and Jakob Doek, UN Committee Chair held opposing positions until sitting on a panel at last year’s conference. Since then they have collaborated on two projects."

BULLETIN 6 COMMITTEE INVESTIGATION IN DOMESTIC REMOVAL AND ADOPTION

BULLETIN 6 COMMITTEE INVESTIGATION IN DOMESTIC REMOVAL AND ADOPTION

Adoption agency turns the key after sanctions from supervision

Denmark's only mediator of international adoptions stops its work following sanctions from the Danish Appeals Board.

It has been decided at an extraordinary board meeting in DIA, after it has been hit by a number of sanctions from the Danish Appeals Agency and the Ministry of Social Affairs, Housing and the Elderly.

DIA states this in a press release on Tuesday.

The agency and the ministry supervise the adoption agency.

- It was a difficult decision for the board of DIA to make. But we see no other way out, says Anne Friis, who is deputy chairman of the bureau's board, in the announcement.

Crisis in the field of international adoption

The Minister of Social Affairs and Housing has agreed to suspend the adoption mediating organization DIA's work in mediating international adoptions with all countries.

In May, the Minister of Social Affairs and Housing revoked the adoption mediating organization Danish International Adoption's (DIA) permission to cooperate with Madagascar. In December 2023, the Danish Appeals Board suspended DIA's cooperation with South Africa. On 12 January 2024, the Danish Appeals Board notified DIA that it will recommend to the Minister of Social Affairs and Housing that the cooperation with South Africa be definitively stopped. On the basis of a briefing from the Danish Appeals Board, the ministry has recommended to the Minister of Social Affairs and Housing that mediation work with all countries be suspended, which the Minister has  accepted. The decision has been notified to DIA.

Against this background, DIA's board has initiated a controlled winding down of its work as a mediator of international adoptions.  

It is the most serious crisis in the area of ​​adoption in the past 10 years. It happens on the same day that Norway has decided to close international adoption. Although the background is different, the development bears witness to an area which over a number of years has proved difficult to handle with a view to the security of the background for the adoptions.

Minister of Social Affairs and Housing Pernille Rosenkrantz-Theil says:

How software can digitally transform child adoption

Non-profit Both Ends Believing uses low code technology to develop digital records and methods to help vulnerable children and families connect.

 


Each new iteration of technology development creates renewed hope to be a vehicle for good and empower those in need. But it’s not the technology type that enables such work but its application. Dallas-based charity Both Ends Believing (BEB) is just such an example. Through the right intentions and business technology leadership, BEB has placed 7,565 orphans with families since it began in 2010.

BEB’s aim is to transform care for vulnerable children in regions with high orphan populations such as Africa and Latin America. The charity was founded by Craig Juntunen, a former quarterback in the Canadian Football League who turned tech entrepreneur after personally experiencing the challenges of adoption. BEB isn’t a traditional charity; it’s also a digital organization using technology to deal with the complexities and inefficiencies of adoption.

Today, the charity works in nations such as Congo-Brazzaville, Ethiopia, Malawi, Nigeria, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia, as well as the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Paraguay. “We’re in 13 countries with 13 production environments,” says president Mark Schwartz. “Part of the problem is children in institutional care around the world have no records, or, if they do, they’re paper-based and located where the child is.” Research for a book and movie by Juntunen found that the average adoption time for children in these regions is 33 months, leading to costs of around $28,000. “We learned we had to digitize the records,” he adds. “Our partners in federal governments need to understand the educational and medical history before they can begin trying to get them to a family.”

Adoption made easy A Sound Mind

Last week, I shared about a childcare agency here in Negros Occidental who facilitated an adoption. A friend messaged me about the adoption process here in the Philippines and it made me realize that it will also be nice to write about this.

I had the chance the chance to interview Ms. Bahiyyih Ruth G. Robinson, also called Ms. Bai, the Social Welfare and Development (SWAD) Negros Occidental Team Leader, who has experience in adoption processes and other childcare protection programs in the Province of Negros Occidental.

She introduced me to the new adoption law, approved and signed by then President Rodrigo Duterte on January 6, 2022 and took effect on January 28, 2022.

Republic Act No. 11642, also known as the Domestic Administration Adoption and Alternative Child Act, authored by Senators Risa Hontiveros, Pia Cayetano and Grace Poe, will allow domestic adoption proceedings simpler and less costly. The law seeks to streamline alternative childcare services. This law continues to protect the best interests of the Filipino child and the process will be lessened from six years to approximately six months to three years.

The law declares that every child shall remain in the care and custody of his or her parents and should be provided with love, care, understanding and security towards the full and harmonious development of the child’s personality. When it is proven to be insufficient and no one can take the child from the extended family, adoption by unrelated person can be considered. (Complete information is available at Official Gazette of the Philippines website).