Home  

A fake pregnancy, and the online sale of a baby: Shocking trafficking case in Chennai

The Chennai police busted a child trafficking racket that had spread its web from Uttar Pradesh to the city, on Monday. The criminal activity came to light and was investigated after Yogesh Kumar, a Madras High Court advocate trainee, filed a case at the Kilpauk police station over suspicions that his wife had illegally procured a newborn baby.

Yogesh and Padmini got married in February 2016 and just one month later his wife allegedly claimed to be pregnant. According to the police she had a condition which made it difficult for her to conceive a child and thus she faked a pregnancy.

"She seems to have had a problem conceiving and decided to adopt a child without the knowledge of her in-laws," says C Shyamala Devi, the DCP who led a special team to nab the child-trafficking group. "Once she was in her parents' home, she went online and posted that she was looking for a child on a website where people buy and sell other goods. That is how a broker found her and “sold” the baby girl," she explains.

On January 11, 2017, Padmini told her husband that she had given birth to a girl at the Government Hospital for Women and Children in Egmore. But before her husband could reach the hospital from the court, she came back to her parents' residence with the baby. Following this, Kumar filed a petition at the Madras High Court, which directed the child trafficking unit of the city police to probe the matter.

When investigations began, it soon came to light, that the child had been trafficked from a family in Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh. Jeya Sharma (39) and Amit Sharma (42) gave birth to a third child in January 2017 and wanted to sell the baby since they could not take care of the baby.

India to cancel OCI cards of Sherin Mathews' foster parents, relatives in US

Representational Image

India has decided to revoke the OCI cards of the Indian-American foster parents of Sherin Mathews, the three-year-old girl found dead in a culvert in Dallas, and some of their relatives and friends, in a case that attracted global attention and forced the government to tighten the adoption process.

Toddler Sherin's decomposed body was found in a culvert close to her home on October 22 last year, two weeks after her Indian-American foster parents reported her missing.

Counsel General of India in Houston, Anupam Ray said India is cancelling the Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI) cards of Wesley Mathews his wife Sini, who are in jail, and the couple's some relatives and close associates as public opinion in India on this issue is inflamed and travel of these people to India is not in public interest.

Manoj N Abraham and Nissy T Abraham, friends of the Mathews family, were among the first to receive a notice of cancellation of the Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI), which they have challenged in Delhi High Court.

Family portrait

Family portrait

Purnank has close to 300 members from Pune, Mumbai and across the globe, who stay connected on WhatsApp. The Pune members meet almost every month

A city-based support group for adoptive parents and their children is shaping a new narrative for Indian families

Prospective adoptive parents have all of 48 hours to make the decision to adopt a child who has been referred to them. Often, the medical reports of a referral, as a child who is up for adoption is addressed in legal terms, are not up to date. Taking the all-important decision of bringing a new member into a family without complete clarity on a fundamental issue such as physical or mental health then becomes a challenge. In 2015, the Union Ministry of Women and Child Development decided to change the adoption procedure by authorising the Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA) to monitor the system instead of letting local adoption agencies to continue controlling the process. While the move was an attempt to make the system more efficient, it meant that local NGOs and agencies were absolved of any role in supporting parents. “I realised then that support from adoptive parents would be helpful and more authentic for those waiting for their adoption to come through,” says Sangeeta Baginwar, a 46-year-old single adoptive mother, who founded Poornank, a forum of, and for, adoptive parents and children. There are close to 300 members in the group from Pune, Mumbai and across the globe, who stay connected on WhatsApp. There are six different groups on WhatsApp, tells us Baginwar, each dedicated to parents at various stages of adoption — from the pre-adoption stage, to a group focused on parents of young children between the ages of 1 and 6, 6–12, 12–18 and 18 onwards, to single parents, and one group of adopted children.

Earlier this month, some members of Poornank and their children met over lunch. “Members from Pune have been meeting almost every month,” says Baginwar, “At the last meeting, one of the concerns that came up was single mothers discussing how to tackle the question, ‘Where’s our father?, from their children.” Baginwar, an education expert, who organises science exhibitions that include robotics and experiential mathematics, says that children are more accepting of other adopted children. “If you tell them that another child doesn’t have a father just as some children don’t have a brother or a sister, they just accept the idea and move on,” says Amita Marathe, another single mother, who adopted a girl with a congenital heart defect who is now completely cured. Baginwar, who is homeschooling her seven-year-old daughter, Nimisha, speaks from experience. “There are some schools that discriminate against adopted children. I used to know a girl who excelled at Bharatanatyam but was not allowed to perform because she was adopted and not doing well academically,” she says. Nimisha was once told at school that she had two mothers. “I believe that nobody except the parents have a right to discuss this aspect of their life with their adopted children, but having said that, if the school wants to raise the subject, then they should be ready to deal with answering any question that the parent or child has for them,” she says, her eyes flashing with anger at the memory.

Family portrait

Family portrait

Purnank has close to 300 members from Pune, Mumbai and across the globe, who stay connected on WhatsApp. The Pune members meet almost every month

A city-based support group for adoptive parents and their children is shaping a new narrative for Indian families

Prospective adoptive parents have all of 48 hours to make the decision to adopt a child who has been referred to them. Often, the medical reports of a referral, as a child who is up for adoption is addressed in legal terms, are not up to date. Taking the all-important decision of bringing a new member into a family without complete clarity on a fundamental issue such as physical or mental health then becomes a challenge. In 2015, the Union Ministry of Women and Child Development decided to change the adoption procedure by authorising the Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA) to monitor the system instead of letting local adoption agencies to continue controlling the process. While the move was an attempt to make the system more efficient, it meant that local NGOs and agencies were absolved of any role in supporting parents. “I realised then that support from adoptive parents would be helpful and more authentic for those waiting for their adoption to come through,” says Sangeeta Baginwar, a 46-year-old single adoptive mother, who founded Poornank, a forum of, and for, adoptive parents and children. There are close to 300 members in the group from Pune, Mumbai and across the globe, who stay connected on WhatsApp. There are six different groups on WhatsApp, tells us Baginwar, each dedicated to parents at various stages of adoption — from the pre-adoption stage, to a group focused on parents of young children between the ages of 1 and 6, 6–12, 12–18 and 18 onwards, to single parents, and one group of adopted children.

Earlier this month, some members of Poornank and their children met over lunch. “Members from Pune have been meeting almost every month,” says Baginwar, “At the last meeting, one of the concerns that came up was single mothers discussing how to tackle the question, ‘Where’s our father?, from their children.” Baginwar, an education expert, who organises science exhibitions that include robotics and experiential mathematics, says that children are more accepting of other adopted children. “If you tell them that another child doesn’t have a father just as some children don’t have a brother or a sister, they just accept the idea and move on,” says Amita Marathe, another single mother, who adopted a girl with a congenital heart defect who is now completely cured. Baginwar, who is homeschooling her seven-year-old daughter, Nimisha, speaks from experience. “There are some schools that discriminate against adopted children. I used to know a girl who excelled at Bharatanatyam but was not allowed to perform because she was adopted and not doing well academically,” she says. Nimisha was once told at school that she had two mothers. “I believe that nobody except the parents have a right to discuss this aspect of their life with their adopted children, but having said that, if the school wants to raise the subject, then they should be ready to deal with answering any question that the parent or child has for them,” she says, her eyes flashing with anger at the memory.

Woman claiming to be Jayalalithaa’s daughter asks for DNA test; SC rejects plea

A view of the Supreme Court of India.

A view of the Supreme Court of India. | Photo Credit: R.V. Moorthy

A Bench of Justices Madan B. Lokur and Deepak Gupta, however, allowed the woman the liberty to pursue other remedies in law.

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to entertain the writ petition of a woman, claiming to be the biological daughter of former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa, for a DNA test to ascertain her parentage.

A Bench of Justices Madan B. Lokur and Deepak Gupta, however, allowed the woman, identified as Amrutha and represented by Indira Jaising, the liberty to pursue other remedies in law.

Delhi High Court Rohit Shekhar vs Narayan Dutt Tiwari & Anr on 27 April, 2012

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.

1. The challenge in this appeal is to the judgment dated 23 rd September, 2011 of the learned Single Judge allowing I.A. No. 10394/2011 of the respondent no.1 (defendant no.1 in the Suit) in CS(OS) No. 700/2008 filed by the appellant. Notice of the appeal was issued and the counsels have been heard.

2. CS(OS) No. 700/2008 is filed by the appellant for declaration, that he is the natural born son of the respondent no.1 and the respondent no.2 Dr. Ujjwala Sharma, and that the respondent no.1 is the father of the appellant and for perpetual injunction restraining respondent no.1 from denying in public or otherwise the fact that he is the father of the appellant. The said suit is pending consideration.

3. During the pendency of the suit, the appellant filed I.A. No. 4720/2008 under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) for direction to the respondent no.1 to submit himself for a DNA test and/or any other test required to determine the parentage of the appellant. The said application was contested by the respondent no.1. The learned Single Judge before whom the suit was then pending, vide order/judgment dated 23rd December, 2010 allowed the said application and directed the parties to appear before the Joint Registrar on 8 th February, 2011; the Joint Registrar was directed to arrange for the DNA testing of the respondent no.1 by the Centre for Cellular & Molecular Biology (Constituent Laboratory of the Council of Scientific Industrial Research, Government of India); the respondent no.1 was directed to, on the date and time to be designated by the Joint Registrar, furnish the samples for such testing; the said Institute was directed to furnish the report to the Court within six weeks of receiving the samples.

4. The respondent no.1 preferred an appeal being FAO(OS) No. 44/2011 against the aforesaid order/judgment dated 23rd December, 2010. The said FAO(OS) was dismissed by the Division Bench of this Court on 7th February, 2011.

I wish to adopt a child: Bengal’s transgender judge

I wish to adopt a child: Bengal's transgender judge

X

The bench that ruled against Section 377 had said it would only deal with the question of the validity of Section 377 and would not venture into the issue of marriage relating to the LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer) community or inheritance in live-in relationships.

When the Supreme Court Thursday decriminalised homosexuality in a historic verdict, Joyita Mondal, a transgender judge, was joyous but also looking beyond Section 377 and the broader issues of adoption, employment and elections concerning the LGBTQ community.

“Though India received independence long back, we got ours today,” said Mondal, a Lok Adalat judge in North Dinajpur district’s Islampur in North Bengal. Follow Section 377 verdict reactions LIVE updates

Same sex marriage, adoption next?

Same sex marriage, adoption next?

“Till now, as homosexuality was criminalised, any course you wished to pursue like marriage or adoption becomes illegal and criminalised." said lawyer Vijayalakshmi Khopade.

PUNE: While the Supreme Court has legalised the homosexuality, same sex marriages are yet to be legalised. Moreover, adoption too remains a non-permissible account for same sex couples in India. Sakal Times spoke to legal experts about what will be other issues that need to be tackled after this historic verdict.

“Till now, as homosexuality was criminalised, any course you wished to pursue like marriage or adoption becomes illegal and criminalised. But now when consensual sex between LGBTQI community and homosexuality has been given legal status, they should get social acceptance in way of marriage and followed by permitting adoption for such couples,” said lawyer Vijayalakshmi Khopade.

“There are very rare cases of same sex couples adopting children, therefore, stating that it will prove to be negative is wrong. Definitely, a study should be carried out regarding sociology, psychology and legal aspects of adoption in these cases. There are many single parents whose children have grown up to be fine citizens. Apart from this, there should be statutory provisions to define adoption for the child who is being adopted by such couples in terms of succession, property etc,” said Khopade.