Home  

Adoption Suspension Leaves Children in Limbo

NEPAL
Adoption Suspension Leaves Children in Limbo
By Bhuwan Sharma

KATHMANDU, Sep 10, 2010 (IPS) - A big question marks looms over the future of many Nepali children in various child homes in the country in the wake of the suspension by 11 countries of their child adoption programmes for this Himalayan nation.

"Children will now have to remain in grim orphanages or may risk a worse fate by staying with families that don’t want them," says Philip Holmes, the adoptive father of two Nepali children and country director of Esther Benjamins Trust-Nepal, a U.K.-registered charity engaged in childcare and child protection and fighting child trafficking in Nepal. 

Some 400 Nepali children are adopted by foster parents each year from 44 institutional homes accredited by the country’s Ministry for Women, Children and Social Welfare. There is no data available on the number of Nepali children given up for adoption yearly. 

Besides orphans, Nepali law permits inter-country adoption for voluntarily committed children, who have been surrendered to a child welfare home, orphanage or Bal Mandir, a national children’s organisation, by either their guardians or parents. 

Problems ranging from fake documents, lack of transparency in handling funds and corruption in the adoption process, which have been reported over the years, have led to the latest round of adoption suspensions. 

Following similar allegations by recipient countries, the Nepali government suspended inter-country adoptions in May 2007, before lifting the self- imposed ban in January 2009. Intra-country adoptions were allowed to continue although local response to calls for adoption had always been very poor. 

Even after the 2007 suspension and its eventual lifting, adoption problems continued to plague the tiny kingdom in the eastern Himalayas. In February, The Hague Conference on Private International Law, an inter-governmental organisation, released a report roundly criticising Nepal’s adoption system, citing gross irregularities. 

In 2008, Nepal came up with the "Terms and Conditions and Process for Granting Approval for Adoption of Nepali Child by an Alien." These, however, were "not adequate as a legal framework to conduct inter-country adoptions," said the Hague Report. It added that Nepal’s refurbished laws still "fall short of Hague Convention standards." 

The report recommended "better regulations of children’s homes" and elimination of "financial gain from inter-country adoption." 

On Aug. 6, the U.S. government slapped a ban on inter-country adoptions from Nepal, citing the need "to protect the rights and interests of certain Nepali children and their families, and of U.S. prospective adoptive parents." Ten other countries – Canada, Denmark, Germany, France, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, Spain, Italy and Britain – had previously taken similar actions following the release of The Hague report. 

"A few bad apples are besmirching the image of the entire sector," says Sher Jung Karki, undersecretary of the Ministry of Women, Children and Social Welfare. 

"There are mainly two problems plaguing the sector: The documentation process is shoddy, which weakens the cases even of children who genuinely qualify for adoption," says Upendra Keshari Neupane, a member of the government’s Investigation, Recommendation and Monitoring Committee on inter-country adoption. 

"The second is the practise by some child centres of resorting to fake documents in order to put up even unqualified children for adoption," Neupane adds. Data reveals that foster parents prefer to adopt children who are younger than three years. 

"The primary problem is with the huge amount of money involved," says Holmes. "When one has to pay 8,000 U.S. dollars to adopt a Nepali child, of which 5,000 dollars goes to the child care centre, there are bound to be irregularities. In Nepal, 5,000 dollars is quite a big amount." 

"The adoption fee has to be brought down to curb irregularities," Holmes says, adding, "a blanket suspension is not the answer to the problem." 

But Karki points out that Nepal’s adoption fee is quite low compared to many other countries. Institutional homes, he says, need money to take care of many other children who remain in their care. 

Holmes believes the Nepali government should be given the benefit of the doubt, noting that there has been some progress since authorities reopened the sector in 2009. 

"When I adopted my first child in 2006, I was liaising directly with the child care centre, which is wrong," Holmes says. "But I got my second child in 2009 through the central allocation system. I filed an application in May and until September, when we finally brought him home, we were not allowed to meet him." 

According to Article 29 of the 1993 Hague Inter-country Adoption Convention, which Nepal signed in April 2009 but has yet to ratify, direct contact between the prospective adoptive parents and the biological parents or guardians is not permitted before verification of the suitability of the child and the prospective adoptive parents. 

Ministry of Women, Children and Social Welfare spokesperson Ram Prasad Bhattarai says, "more needs to be done but things are changing." 

Karki echoes Bhattarai’s observation. "Things are moving forward," says Karki. "We are working to nip the problem in the bud by developing a system whereby a child can be taken in by the institutional homes only after doing a thorough check of his or her background." 

"We are also trying to lay down stringent punishment for those trying to turn the industry into a money-making business," Karki adds. "Right now, we can do nothing other than delisting the centre from our list of centres accredited by the ministry for inter-country adoption." 

Neupane believes widespread poverty is also fuelling the irregularities. Poor parents have been found colluding with institutional homes to make it appear their children are orphans, he says. 

"Sometimes they do it in the hope that their child will have a better future while at other times, acute poverty forces them to do this for some money," Neupane says.
 
 

Boy caught up in clash of cultures over adoption

Boy caught up in clash of cultures over adoption

By MICHAEL FIELD - Stuff

Last updated 05:00 10/09/2010

Iqbal Sharif

IQBAL SHARIF: Wants the Pakistan-born child to live in New Zealand.

Relevant offers

An Auckland judge will decide the fate of a 16-month-old boy in a clash of cultures over international adoption.

Mohammad Huzaifa was born in Karachi in May last year. Two days later his birth parents gave him to their close friends, Pakistan-born New Zealand citizens Iqbal Sharif and Sara Sami, under an arrangement made before the birth.

The Pakistan Family Court has issued a Certificate of Guardianship, formally recognising the donation. But Immigration New Zealand will not give the child a visa.

Pakistan is governed by Islamic Sharia law, which does not recognise the concept of legal adoption – Mohammad has kept his birth father's name despite being given to the New Zealand couple.

The case's outcome hangs on a couple of words – guardianship versus adoption – and highlights the contrast between the laws of Islamic and secular states.

If the boy's adoptive parents are successful, it will be the first adoption between Pakistan and New Zealand.

Justice Christopher Allan heard the case in the High Court at Auckland yesterday and will give his judgment later.

Mr Sharif, through lawyer Evgeny Orlov, claims his Bill of Rights Act rights have been breached and asked Justice Allan for a declaration against the attorney-general.

In his affidavit, Mr Sharif said he and his wife had been married since 1994. Since then she had suffered several miscarriages and failed IVF treatment.

As their hopes of a child faded, a close friend promised them a child. Two days after he was born, the child was given to the couple and Mrs Sami has since been in Karachi with him, unable to come home. "Our family has been separated since this time and this has caused us an enormous amount of stress."

Mr Orlov told the court that the couple had wanted to "adopt a child from their own Muslim culture so they could bring up the child with its own belief systems and cultural values".

The couple's friends had "performed an act of great grace with considerable beneficial religious significance for them in giving up their child as a gift to their childless friends".

Both sides in the court accept the guardianship was honest and open, did not involve child trafficking, and did not come under the Hague Convention. "The real issue is over a word, and the word is adoption," Mr Orlov said.

Immigration NZ had failed to consider the rights and best interests of the child. New Zealand had "a case of tunnel vision" by not recognising Sharia law's view of a child's identity and guardianship, Mr Orlov said.

Ad Feedback <SCRIPT SRC="http://inl.adbureau.net/jnserver/acc_random=9033899666/site=s/area=s.stuff.national/aamsz=300x250/POS=STORYBODY/SOURCEDOMAIN=www.stuff.co.nz/KEYWORD=AUCKLAND+Affair+BIRTH+COURT+CULTURE+Citizenship+DEVELOPMENT+DONATION+FAMILYCOURT+GIFT+HIGHCOURT+HOME+INTERNATIONAL+IVF+ADOPTION/pageid=2466395795"></SCRIPT>

If Justice Allan rules that Sharia law on guardianship equates with New Zealand law on adoption, Immigration NZ will need to reconsider its refusal to grant a visa.

A Social Development Ministry spokesman said New Zealand did not have an adoption programme with Pakistan and, "as far as we know, Pakistan does not have adoption legislation".

An overseas guardianship order was not enough to allow Internal Affairs to grant a child New Zealand citizenship.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/4114463/Boy-caught-up-in-clash-of-cultures-over-adoption

By MICHAEL FIELD - Stuff

Last updated 05:00 10/09/2010

Share

Print

Minister requests investigation into foreign adoption case

Minister requests investigation into foreign adoption case

Family and Population Minister Moushira Khattab has submitted a formal request to the attorney-general for investigations into a case in Qalyubiya in which parents are alleged to have put their children up for adoption by Egyptian expatriates living in Europe.
“Such practices violate human and child rights and represent a form of child trafficking,” Khattab said, adding that the law granted the state the authority to bring the parents in question to trial.
Al-Masry Al-Youm has obtained documents proving the existence of "agents" tasked with mediating adoption deals between Egyptian families and expatriate Egyptians in European countries, particularly Italy, the Netherlands and Sweden.
More than 25 documents reveal that adopted children--all under the age of 15--come mostly from the villages of Aghour al-Soghra and Aghour al-Kobra in the Qalyubiya Governorate, located some 30 km north of Cairo.
According to a judicial source speaking on condition of anonymity, more than 500 children this year alone have been sent to Europe for this reason--without any social or legal repercussions--even though the practice is in complete violation of both Egyptian and Islamic law.
It is notable that, in compliance with Islamic Sharia, Egypt's Child Law explicitly prohibits adoption.
Egyptian laws against human trafficking consider guilty anyone involved in the practice, whether by selling, offering to sell, purchasing, transporting or delivering children--either domestically or across national borders--through the use of force, threat, fraud, deception or abduction.
Translated from the Arabic Edition.

Preet Mandir: Bombay HC allows adoption of 17 children

Preet Mandir: Bombay HC allows adoption of 17 children

Express News Service Tags : court, temple, preet mandir Posted: Fri Sep 10 2010, 06:14 hrs Pune:  

 

 

The Bombay High Court recently allowed Preet Mandir to continue the adoption process of 17 children that had begun before the adoption home’s licences were revoked. “All these 17 cases are of foreign adoption and Central Adoption Resources Agency (CARA) has undertaken to give a no-objection certificate in these 17 inter-country adoptions,” said advocate Ajit Kulkarni, who represented Preet Mandir in the Bombay High Court.

 

 

The two-member bench of Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justice R P Sondur-Baldota on Wednesday set aside the cancellation of adoption license of Preet Mandir stating it is against natural justice, but said the licences remain to be suspended till the the case continues in the court. Though the move has come as a major relief for the 17 adoptions, the court is yet to decide on whether the remaining children in Preet Mandir can be transferred to another adoption house. The matter is expected to be heard on September 16.

Adoption Suspension Leaves Children in Limbo

Adoption Suspension Leaves Children in Limbo By Bhuwan Sharma KATHMANDU, Sep 10, 2010 (IPS) - A big question marks looms over the future of many Nepali children in various child homes in the country in the wake of the suspension by 11 countries of their child adoption programmes for this Himalayan nation. "Children will now have to remain in grim orphanages or may risk a worse fate by staying with families that don’t want them," says Philip Holmes, the adoptive father of two Nepali children and country director of Esther Benjamins Trust-Nepal, a U.K.-registered charity engaged in childcare and child protection and fighting child trafficking in Nepal. Some 400 Nepali children are adopted by foster parents each year from 44 institutional homes accredited by the country’s Ministry for Women, Children and Social Welfare. There is no data available on the number of Nepali children given up for adoption yearly. Besides orphans, Nepali law permits inter-country adoption for voluntarily committed children, who have been surrendered to a child welfare home, orphanage or Bal Mandir, a national children’s organisation, by either their guardians or parents. Problems ranging from fake documents, lack of transparency in handling funds and corruption in the adoption process, which have been reported over the years, have led to the latest round of adoption suspensions. Following similar allegations by recipient countries, the Nepali government suspended inter-country adoptions in May 2007, before lifting the self- imposed ban in January 2009. Intra-country adoptions were allowed to continue although local response to calls for adoption had always been very poor. Even after the 2007 suspension and its eventual lifting, adoption problems continued to plague the tiny kingdom in the eastern Himalayas. In February, The Hague Conference on Private International Law, an inter-governmental organisation, released a report roundly criticising Nepal’s adoption system, citing gross irregularities. In 2008, Nepal came up with the "Terms and Conditions and Process for Granting Approval for Adoption of Nepali Child by an Alien." These, however, were "not adequate as a legal framework to conduct inter-country adoptions," said the Hague Report. It added that Nepal’s refurbished laws still "fall short of Hague Convention standards." The report recommended "better regulations of children’s homes" and elimination of "financial gain from inter-country adoption." On Aug. 6, the U.S. government slapped a ban on inter-country adoptions from Nepal, citing the need "to protect the rights and interests of certain Nepali children and their families, and of U.S. prospective adoptive parents." Ten other countries – Canada, Denmark, Germany, France, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, Spain, Italy and Britain – had previously taken similar actions following the release of The Hague report. "A few bad apples are besmirching the image of the entire sector," says Sher Jung Karki, undersecretary of the Ministry of Women, Children and Social Welfare. "There are mainly two problems plaguing the sector: The documentation process is shoddy, which weakens the cases even of children who genuinely qualify for adoption," says Upendra Keshari Neupane, a member of the government’s Investigation, Recommendation and Monitoring Committee on inter-country adoption. "The second is the practise by some child centres of resorting to fake documents in order to put up even unqualified children for adoption," Neupane adds. Data reveals that foster parents prefer to adopt children who are younger than three years. "The primary problem is with the huge amount of money involved," says Holmes. "When one has to pay 8,000 U.S. dollars to adopt a Nepali child, of which 5,000 dollars goes to the child care centre, there are bound to be irregularities. In Nepal, 5,000 dollars is quite a big amount." "The adoption fee has to be brought down to curb irregularities," Holmes says, adding, "a blanket suspension is not the answer to the problem." But Karki points out that Nepal’s adoption fee is quite low compared to many other countries. Institutional homes, he says, need money to take care of many other children who remain in their care. Holmes believes the Nepali government should be given the benefit of the doubt, noting that there has been some progress since authorities reopened the sector in 2009. "When I adopted my first child in 2006, I was liaising directly with the child care centre, which is wrong," Holmes says. "But I got my second child in 2009 through the central allocation system. I filed an application in May and until September, when we finally brought him home, we were not allowed to meet him." According to Article 29 of the 1993 Hague Inter-country Adoption Convention, which Nepal signed in April 2009 but has yet to ratify, direct contact between the prospective adoptive parents and the biological parents or guardians is not permitted before verification of the suitability of the child and the prospective adoptive parents. Ministry of Women, Children and Social Welfare spokesperson Ram Prasad Bhattarai says, "more needs to be done but things are changing." Karki echoes Bhattarai’s observation. "Things are moving forward," says Karki. "We are working to nip the problem in the bud by developing a system whereby a child can be taken in by the institutional homes only after doing a thorough check of his or her background." "We are also trying to lay down stringent punishment for those trying to turn the industry into a money-making business," Karki adds. "Right now, we can do nothing other than delisting the centre from our list of centres accredited by the ministry for inter-country adoption." Neupane believes widespread poverty is also fuelling the irregularities. Poor parents have been found colluding with institutional homes to make it appear their children are orphans, he says. "Sometimes they do it in the hope that their child will have a better future while at other times, acute poverty forces them to do this for some money," Neupane says.

.

Protecting legacy 2: Gwede in cahoots with Jumani

Protecting legacy 2: Gwede in cahoots with Jumani

Kamuzu

Kondwani Bell Munthali’s second instalment has an aide to Malawi’s first president rip into Hastings Banda’s former spy and there’s confusion about Jumani’s birth and adoption   

LILONGWE--Former Intelligence Chief Martin Focus Gwede is on record saying the man he spied for and protected, Malawi’s founding president Hastings Kamuzu Banda, had three children before he died in 1997.

A former cabinet minister and an aide to the former president, Elia Katola Phiri, said in an interview that there was no truth whatsoever in Gwede’s claims which were carried by the Weekend Nation.

In Katola Phiri’s opinion, Gwede’s long spell in jail after falling out with Banda could have led to his “sad and ridiculous” assertions. In other words, Gwede is insane and Katola Phiri, who was long time Local Government Minister in Banda’s cabinet, went on to impugn the character of Gwede as intelligence chief but fell short of spilling the beans. He didn’t want to air Gwede’s dirty linen in public, he claimed.

The statement by the former aide to Banda against Gwede is similar to one made against the man who came from Sweden and claims to be Kamuzu’s son.

Jim Jumani Johansson, 37, has also been accused of having an unstable mind because he spent a year in a Swedish jail. Jumani, a psychologist, has blamed people around him, including his ex-wife, for creating conditions that led to his incarceration. It was doctors who came up with the finding, according to Jumani.

Katola says of Gwede: “The truth needs to be preserved. I don’t know if he has been paid or it is that after years of being a drunk and in isolation he wakes up and makes such statements. It is unfortunate. He cannot claim that in his service he ever saw a woman go into State House apart from workers.”

Senior Chief Kaomba from Kasungu--Banda’s home district in central Malawi—warned Gwede and others who were working with Johansson in making unfounded claims that they might be required to bring evidence to substantiate their statements on Kamuzu.

Kaomba said Kamuzu, while travelling London, he met several people including Malawians and families he had known during his stay in Britain and it was possible that Gwede, who had accompanied Kamuzu, met children of one of Kamuzu’s former staff at his clinic.

“This woman had two children. She went to work in Ghana and briefly at one point came to Malawi. Her two children were all white. Gwede might have met such people,” said Kaomba.

Who was this woman? Was he referring to a Mrs. French whose husband is said have mentioned Kamuzu Banda contributing to their divorce?

The chief nodded.

The cyberspace has images of another Kamuzu look-alike—some say Jumani resembles the man he claims to be his biological father—floating around and he is said to have been a result of an affair Banda had with a Ghanaian woman. The man is Ghanaian businessman Alhaji Asoma Banda born in 1932 when Kamuzu was reportedly schooling in the United States. After leaving the United Kingdom, Kamuzu lived in Ghana before coming to Malawi, then Nyasaland, to join the liberation struggle.

Mrs. French’s son, Peter, has dismissed as untrue a claim that his mother and Banda had two children. Mrs. French was Banda’s secretary in the U.K. (We will return to Mrs. French and Dr. Banda in the last instalment.)

While Banda has been “given” children, there’s one man who has come up to say he believes Banda was his father, a move that has stirred up the emotions of Banda’s relatives as the court is about to decide how Banda’s wealth, said to be in millions of dollars both at home and abroad, is distributed. Jumani wants to take a DNA test to prove his claims. He also wants Mirriam Kaunda to do the same to prove that she gave birth to him. Kaunda has however said Jumani’s father was a man of Indian descent and not Kamuzu.

Jumani was born 2 May, 1973, according to his birth certificate.

But the man we met earlier in the story, Katola Phiri, says when Jumani was adopted in 1979, he was still an infant.

He said around 1979, Mirriam Kaunda--who had married a white man, presumed to be Mats Hakan Johansson—was, together with her family, living in Area 11. One day the Johansson’s had a garden sale at their home and Katola Phiri “went to buy things.”

“I remember I bought several things. We were told that not to make noise; there was a baby sleeping [and] people used to say it was a white baby,” said Katola Phiri.

Mats Hakan Johansson, Jumani’s adoptive father is listed as an engineer at Business Machines Limited, P.O Box 30089 Lilongwe 3 on the adoption paper in a case Cause number 2 of 1978 in the Lilongwe Resident Magistrate Court. The adoption order was signed by Resident Magistrate Tambala.

Jumani’s birth certificate whose details were sourced from the Registrar General’s department in 2009 identifies him as Jim Jumani Kaunda who was born on 2nd May, 1973 at Ekwendeni Hospital and was registered on 9th June, 1978 by R.L Ndala as birth within Mzimba district.

Toddler Jumani w/parents. pic: bnl

Magistrate Tambala’s order however recognizes Jumani as an infant on 6th April, 1979 as it reads, “And being satisfied that the allegations in the said petition are true and being also satisfied with the undertaking of the said Mats Hakan Johansson and his said wife and being further satisfied that is for the benefit of the said infant that he should be adopted.”

Throughout the adoption process Jumani is identified as an infant yet he should have been six years old in 1979 unless his mother Mirriam Kaunda presented another baby to the court.

Katola’s version of an infant further confuses the story as the birth certificate has no father’s name on it and it shows Kaunda adopting her own baby and information to the court presented by Mirriam herself.

In trying to clear up the muddy water, Senior Chief Kaomba suggested that Kamuzu might have paid for Jumani’s education as the former president did for many others who had benefitted from his generosity during his life time. Is that where Jumani got the idea that Kamuzu was his father? If that were the case that Banda sponsored his education--which the chief only suggested--it shouldn’t raise any eyebrows because Banda liked to help others, he said.

Any clearer? You be the judge.—maravipost

Part 3 Saturday



Read more: http://maravipost.com/index.php?Itemid=124&catid=54:politics&id=3988:kinsmen-protecting-legacy-2-gwede-in-cahoots-wjumani&option=com_content&view=article#ixzz104Y8Yy4B

Blog: "It costs the orphanages $2,500 U.S. to place children with the Ministry for adoption."

"It costs the orphanages $2,500 U.S. to place children with the Ministry for adoption."

From:

http://newbrownchild.blogspot.com/2010/09/coming-home.html

Friday, September 10, 2010

Bad News - Coming Home

Prosecutor says defendant in human trafficking case could face more charges

Prosecutor says defendant in human trafficking case could face more charges

Posted on: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 10:04:37 EDT


A federal prosecutor said today a company victimized nearly 900 Thai workers, more than double the 400 cited in a grand jury indictment that alleges forced labor at farms in Hawaii and on the mainland.

Susan French said she expects to have an updated indictment in November. She made those comments at the bail hearing for Mordechai Yosef Orian, the president and CEO of the company that provided the Thai farm workers, Global Horizons Manpower Inc.

French said Orian also faces up to 70 years in prison if he is found guilty of the charges in the current indictment stemming from actions involving the 400 Thai workers in 2004 and 2005. She said he will face up to 200 years in prison when the indictment is updated to include actions involving 900 Thai workers from 2002 to 2007.

She said the government has seized an aircraft Orian bought to transfer farm workers between islands.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Leslie Kobayashi found Orian, 45, to be a flight risk because he has access to substantial amounts of money, has tax liens against him and has ties in his native Israel, is not a U.S. citizen and is appealing a deportation order.

Kobayashi granted Orian release from custody pending trial if he posts $1 million bond secured by real property.

Orian's Los Angeles-based lawyer, Mark Werksman, said Orian's home in Malibu, Calif., and property he owns in Kona together are worth at least $1 million. However, he later asked Kobayashi if Orian can use property owned by somebody else to satisfy the bond requirement.

Kobayashi said no.

She also ordered electronically monitored home detention, restricted Orian's travel to between Hawaii and California and prohibited him from residing on his Hawaii property.

French said she will appeal Kobayashi's order granting Orian release on bond. She had asked Kobayashi to order Orian held in custody without the opportunity for bail pending trial.

Kobayashi's order is on hold pending the appeal.

Werksman had asked for Orian's immediate release so he can return to California to celebrate the Rosh Hashanah Jewish holiday with his family. He also said Orian's 13-year-old son's Bar Mitzvah is on Sept. 26 and it would be tragic if Orian was not there for a key milestone in his oldest son's life.

French said Orian has civil judgments and lawsuits against him across the country including Hawaii, Washington and Colorado. And a judge in Washington sanctioned Orian for not making payments toward a judgment against him.

She said she has a report of Orian involved in human trafficking of Chinese nationals in Israel in 1996, before he moved to the U.S. And when a judge prohibited him from recruiting and providing farm workers in Colorado as a result of a lawsuit in that state, Orian took his operation to Canada, French said.

"This is not new news. There is a pattern of this conduct," she said.

Orian was not at his California home when FBI agents tried to arrest last week.

Werksman said Orian was in San Antonio, Texas, where he runs a nonprofit adoption service.

To see more of The Star-Advertiser, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go tohttp://www.staradvertiser.com/. Copyright (c) 2010, The Honolulu Star-AdvertiserDistributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services. For more informationabout the content services offered by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services(MCT), visit www.mctinfoservices.com, e-mail services@mctinfoservices.com, orcall 866-280-5210 (outside the United States, call +1 312-222-4544).

For full details on Manpower Inc (MAN) MAN. Manpower Inc (MAN) has Short Term PowerRatings at TradingMarkets. Details on Manpower Inc (MAN) Short Term PowerRatings is available at This Link.

 

http://www.tradingmarkets.com/news/stock-alert/man_prosecutor-says-defendant-in-human-trafficking-case-could-face-more-charges-1159056.html

 

Exclusive: Immigration Case May Keep Alleged Human Trafficker In Prison

Exclusive: Immigration Case May Keep Alleged Human Trafficker In Prison

Largest U.S. Human Trafficking Case May Expand

 

POSTED: 10:09 pm HST September 8, 2010

Missing child united with parents

Missing child united with parents

Last updated on: September 09, 2010 14:00 IST


Seven-year-old Mohammed Fazlu's life abruptly went off the rails when he stumbled into a train compartment in April in search of his missing ball.

Over four months later, when everyone had given up hope, he was restored to his family.

There will possibly never be a happier Eid for this child.

Abhishek Mande follows the trail.
On the afternoon of September 8, Ruby Nakka walked into the government reception home in Vellore run by Tamil Nadu's child welfare department to inquire about Mohammed Fazlu, who had been living there for over four months now.

Sometime in April, Fazlu, while playing football near the railway tracks, kicked the ball into a train compartment. As he stepped into the compartment to fetch it, the train began to move.

The terrified little boy -- he is only 7 -- stayed on the train.

On April 29, Railway Police Force constables picked him up at the Jolarpettai railway station in Tamil Nadu over 1,300 km from Mumbai [ Images ], which the child was is his home.

Unfortunately, the only two other things that Fazlu could recall of his whereabouts is a locality he calls Laksha Mohalla and a restaurant near his house called Mindha.

Fazlu could speak and understand Kannada and remembers the names of his family members -- father Ghouse Basha, a car mechanic, his mother Dilshad, a housewife, brothers Shakoor and Roshan and sisters Salma, Zaiba and Jamila, who he recalled being married to a certain Hafiz.

Till the morning of September 8, Ruby Nakka, a member of the local Child Welfare Committee, was quite sure that the boy was from Mumbai. He had spoken with his contact at the Mumbai CWC and was told that locating Laksha Mohalla in Mumbai was like trying to find a needle in a haystack.

Later that morning he received a call from Lava Kumar, a retired police officer from Bengaluru [ Images ], who told him that perhaps he was looking in the wrong state altogether!

Kumar pointed out that there was a Lashkar Mohalla in Mysore City, Karnataka [ Images ].

"That seemed to make sense because the boy spoke and understood Kannada," Nakka told Rediff.com over the telephone from Vellore on Wednesday.

So when he visited Fazlu he asked the boy if he ate ragi. The young boy said yes.

Ragi is a cereal popular in Karnataka. Known as nachni in Marathi, ragi is not part of the Maharashtrian staple diet. Dosas made out of ragi are available only in certain south Indian restaurants and its laddoos sold as 'health food' in select stores in Mumbai.

It was increasingly becoming clear to Nakka that the boy was not from Mumbai but rather from some place in Karnataka.

Recalling the series of events Nakka said, "Some RPF constables found him at Jolarpettai railway station after a Mumbai-bound Mumbai Jayanti Janata Express from Kanyakumari had passed by. They handed him over to a local NGO who then brought him to us (the CWC)."

When Nakka sat with the boy, it didn't take him long to figure out that it would be a while before Fazlu would find his way back home.

Adding to the confusion was the little fellow's disclosure that he had changed trains before ending up in Jolarpettai that morning.

Nakka described the boy as being "a loving child who is confident, well adjusting and does his namaz at seven every evening without fail."

"He seems to have adjusted to his new surroundings but he misses home and wants to go back to his parents. He tells us that it's Ramzan and misses being with his family at this time of the year."

The government reception home you are told shifted to its present location about a year ago and has a capacity to accommodate up to 60 children at any given point.

Besides Fazlu it housed four other children. The families of two children have been tracked down to Assam and Rajasthan [ Images ] respectively and the children will be on their way home. The other two -- who it seems may be here for longer -- were found a couple of weeks ago.

One of them does not have parents; his extended family has turned him over to the CWC being unable to take care of him. The other child is said to be mute and perhaps mentally challenged.

At the reception home, Fazlu spent his time playing and learning maths and other handiwork from a teacher. "It isn't formal education but rather something that will keep him occupied and yet be educational. This isn't supposed to be his permanent home," Nakka pointed out.

Ruby Nakka -- who runs an NGO called Hope House for the protection and care of orphaned children in Vellore -- seems like a man who would like to follow rules but knows that sometimes rules can be cruel.

When the boy was brought to him, he questioned him conscientiously. He has been trying to track the boy's home for the last four months.

Ideally, he would have figured out what state -- if not what city -- the boy had come from. Once that was done, it would be his duty to hand the child over to the relevant CWC who would then take it up from there.

With Fazlu's case things got complicated. "Since we don't know where he came from, we could not send him anywhere," Nakka had said on Wednesday.

The other option Nakka had was putting the boy in foster care or up for adoption. Adoption, he had said earlier, would be the last resort.

"If we manage to find his parents in the meanwhile, his being adopted would make things complicated since it is irrevocable. Foster care seems like a logical choice. But I'd be happiest if we manage to find his parents. Growing up in an organisation isn't the best thing for a child," he had said on Wednesday.

Nakka should know. The US-returned physiotherapist has spent 12 years of his life growing up in such a set-up because his parents couldn't afford to take care of him.

"They had three daughters after me. So I was sent to an organisation where I grew up. I studied physiotherapy at Vellore's Christian Medical College and went to the US. I stayed there for ten years, adopted two daughters and realised it was time for me to come back home."

Today Nakka's Hope House works for the protection and care of orphaned children. He also supports his parents financially and says he has never held any grudge against them for sending him away from home. "They never made me feel like I was dumped. Every time they would come over, they'd make me feel special and wanted. I realised where they were coming from. On the brighter side, I couldn't have got to where I am today had it not been for my upbringing in an organisation."

Nakka confesses that a part of him wishes he had memories of being with his family the way other children did. And so each time he would look at Fazlu in the reception home, Nakka would feel a pang of hurt.

As Eid grew closer, a sense of urgency grew inside Nakka. He knew that it was a time for families to come together and celebrate. And a boy of mere seven should not be alone in a government reception home.

"I was hoping we could find his parents by Eid," he says.

In the wee hours of September 9, Nakka received a phone call.

It was four am and he might have fought the urge to not take it. Nakka had had a long day with journalists from all over the country calling him up for information.

But Ruby Nakka took the call.

On the other line were voices he had hoped to hear for over four months. The boy's parents had called up! They had seen a report on their son on a television new channel. They obtained Nakka's number and called him.

On Thursday morning, the morning before Eid, they travelled to Vellore and saw their son. It was a sight they had possibly given up hopes of seeing. Call it divine intervention or the power of the mass media but what might have seemed impossible had been achieved.

Ruby Nakka will now head out of town. When he returns to Vellore three days later, he will tick off one more thing off his to-do list: 'Reunite Mohammed Fazlu with family -- Done!'

Somewhere near Bengaluru tonight, a seven-year-old boy will have an Iftar meal with his family. Tomorrow he will wear a prayer cap, visit the family mosque, kneel before Allah and offer thanksgiving.