Home  

Adoption from Brazil - 1974

Nummer: 3.4907 E-Mail:  cilene1@hotmail.de  Datum: 04.08.2006

Cilene wurde 1974 in Brasilien im Bundesstaat Ceará geboren und kam 1975 durch Adoption nach Deutschland. Die Adoption lief damals über einen katholischen deutschen Priester, der in ihrem Geburtsort tätig war. Sie sucht andere erwachsene Adoptierte aus Brasilien, die hier in Deutschland leben. Cilene würde gerne wissen, wie es andern mit der Adoption ergangen ist und würde sich über Kontakte sehr freuen. Es ist nicht einfach, andere "Betroffene" zu finden.

Book Hoksbergen - Hoksbergen convinces Els Wunnink to work for BIA

Rough translation – Book Hoksbergen – Page 82 – 83

Beginning 1975 follows the adoption channel India. At that time already 30 children had come via private channels from Bombay (Mumbai), Pune and Madras (Chennai) to the Netherland. Already in the sixties children left India, especially to the US. This went all rather easy, as India only regulated adoptions somewhat in 1984. Negative publicity, in 1982, about the death of an adopted child on its way to its adoptive parents, was probably the reason for this (Apparao, 1997).

WK board member Rene Hoksbergen goes to Mumbai, end 1974, to convince a private mediator, Els Wunnink, that it is much better and safer to mediate through an adoption agency. And also to use the arrange the placements through the order of the central waiting list of the Dutch Ministry of Justice.

After the visiting of 15 children’s homes in five far apart cities in India and after long talks, Els decides to do all further mediations via WK. In 1976 already many more children are coming from India than before. . Els Wunnink lives in such a big apartment that she can take care of the adoptable children there before they go to the Netherlands. Many years she has 5, 6 children in her house, for whom she cares together with some Indian women. In 1976 Els hires social worker Sulu Kalro, who works up till now for WK. Through her children’s home Bal Anand in Mumbay some 1500 children came to our country. Els Wunnink moves in 1977 to Indonesia and will be active for WK until 1981. She opens in Jakarta the children’s home ‘Pondok Palangi’ hut regenboog, which develops into a small centre for medical help to children.

The other India channel is being managed by the family Van der Mark. This mediator has himself adopted end of the sixties a girl from India, possibly the first adopted child from India. After pressuring from WK, this couple ends begin 1975 their private contacts with some children’s homes in Pune, and Indian city of aprox 2 million inhabitants at that time, and hands them over to WK.

Protestant and Catholic oganizations now arranging adoptions

By Edward B. Fiske

New York Times News Service

NEW YORK - Two religious social service agencies, one Protestant and the other Roman Catholic. have begun programs to arrange the adoption of South Vietnamese orphans by American couples.

The agencies are the Holt International Children's Fund an Evangelical Protestant organization in Eugene Ore., and the Catholic Committee for Refugees of the United States Catholic Conference, the administrative arm of the American bishops.

The new programs are the latest in a series of recent efforts by public officials and private individuals to regularize procedures for the intercountry adoption of Vietnamese orphans. They bring to four the number of American agencies licensed to arrange such adoptions.

Grote toename aspirantouders; adoptiekinderen moeilijker

De Volkskrant

25-04-1973

3

Single but Not Alone: Adoption Brings Family Life to Unmarried

WASHINGTON — “Adoption agencies,” the single parent said bitterly, “play God, and would rather give babies to a couple even though one?third of present marriages end in divorce. My situation is stable and known, which is not true for a divorced parent, often living on $120 a week.”

The speaker, who prefers to be anonymous, is a 50?year old unmarried woman, a Government economist who adopted her daughter, now 2½ years old, privately when agencies did not respond to her requests.

According to Karen Mitchell, head of the Council on Adoptable Children, which lists children available for adoption from agencies, there are 50 single men and women in the Washington area who, seeing matrimony pass them by, decided not to be deprived of parenthood as well (Estimates of single parents nationally and in such areas as New York are not available; one problem is that most figures include stepfather' adoptions of children of women they marry.)

Mrs. Mitchell characterizes single parents as “strong psychologically,” able to overcome the social pressures against single parent adoption (including such suspicions as that the adopted child “is really their own, born out of wedlock”).

Generally, the single parent is female, in her late thirties, has several brothers and sisters, and is a professional earning at least $12,000 a year. She adopts not out of loneliness but, as a male professor said, “out of a sense of fullness,” a desire to love. She sometimes rejects male suitors who feel put out that she chose a child rather than them.

(Dis) Appearing Women in Nationalist Narratives (Part 1): Interview with Respondent

 
(Dis) Appearing Women in Nationalist Narratives (Part 1): Interview with Respondent A 
Conducted by Bina D’Costa[1], the Australian National University
January, 2000
 I (Bina)  gratefully acknowledge Ms Shahin Akhter’s insights and comments during and after the interview.
 
Opening Note: The following interview was conducted in India.  The respondent was not keen to disclose her identity.  For the sake of ethical research practice, I kept the interview unedited.
RA: It was a big drama.  There were two hundred women waiting for us.  Mother Teresa went there at the beginning of January or December.  It was the new Bangladesh government who invited us there.  She didn’t find any girls there.  She had seen only their hair, petticoat and some other things.  Their hair was cut because they were afraid that they’d commit suicide.  They did brutal things and kept the girls naked.  Many were half naked.  We haven’t seen them in this state.  Therefore, we can’t make any comments.  When I went there on January 21, 1972, I started this temporary house.[1] 
BD: Why were you chosen? Did it have to do anything with your Bengali ethnicity?
RA: I mean, we were not chosen as such.  But we were sent because of our experience.  Hossain Ali, the Pakistani High Commissioner in Calcutta — when Bangladesh came to be on December 16, 1971, it was him who declared that he accepted Bangladesh.  After this, Hossain Ali came and visited Mother.  Then went to Shishu Bhaban.  And then I was in charge of Shishu Bhaban.  He asked Mother, “May I take this sister with me? … To tell you the truth I’ve not been to Bangladesh from 1950 till 1972.  That means for 22 years!  And I have not spoken any Bengali till then.  I did not complete my study in Bengali as well.  I lost complete contact with Bengali! 
BD: Was it difficult for you to communicate in Bengali?
BD: Only to collect the war babies? 
RA: Also to do the relief work.  And he is the one who introduced me to the ministers there.  My Bengali was so bad that I always used half Bengali and half English.  Mujib used to say, “Bangladesher meye, Bangla kotha bolo.” (Bengali girl, speak in Bengali)… But Mujib was a great friend.  I could go to any Ministry without pass and ask for help, whatever I needed.  Most of the things were sent from here.  Only thing was that I needed protection for the sisters.  We were foreigners but we did not look foreigners over there.[3] 
BD: Had it been unsafe for the sisters otherwise? 
RA: Yes.  And also when I went there, no other nuns were working outside, in slums and villages.  They were all working in schools and hospitals.  And they worked in their own convents.  When I went there, I started to work everywhere with the sisters.  We never went less than three to do relief work.  And Mizanur Rahman[4] used to say, “You young girls are going out in the world.  Who’d take care of you if anything happens to you?”  So, I told him, “That’s the only thing I ask you.  To give us protection.”  As a foreigner and a visitor we needed protection from any hooligans or people who wanted to cause problems.  It was our work and I had no fear.  I had very young sisters with me.  One was a Bengali and the others were from Kerala.  So they had to learn Bengali and do the work.  We had so much cooperation from the government!  So there was no objection.  So also, when we took the children in, the government didn’t give us any trouble.  When we started sending the children abroad, they gave us passports for the children.  But they did not know even how the adoption was supposed to be going.  I was doing adoption all the time in India.  So, I had a lot of idea how to do the adoption work.  When I went there in the offices to arrange for the children, I had to help them to prepare certificates so they could leave the country.  And based on that they got the passport to go, as not in adoptions.  For Muslims and Christians, they do not go for adoption, but for foster care.  In India, however, Hindus can adopt Hindu babies.  At that time, in Bangladesh, there were no laws for adoption for the Muslims.  At least I don’t thing so… we were the first one to do the adoption, and the children had no religion so to speak.  And in Bangladesh no one was going to adopt them.  Therefore, the government gave us the permission and they gave us the passports.  Even ten days old babies went to Canada.  The only thing is that I had to get a photo, a passport, and book their flight.  They needed to reach the country of destination and from there straight to the hospital.  Many were put in the incubators.  I was there in Bangladesh for two years and eight months and worked in the adoption project… 
BD: What happened to the women who gave away their babies? Do you remember them?
RA: Most of the babies came from the nursing homes.  Midwives, ayas (child-carers) brought the babies.   
BD: Do you remember any of the nursing homes? 
         I know one case, whose father was an engineer.  The whole family was killed.  They were half buried in the sand.  After the Pakistani army moved away, she gained consciousness.  Her story has been written in the Bangladeshi newspapers but of course under a different name.  She didn’t want to have an abortion.  But later on had to give away her baby.  But otherwise, I think everyone went for abortion.  Nobody wanted Pakistani babies.  Nobody!  Neither the parents, nor the government and nor the women…In the course of time, we were getting pregnant women, but we didn’t know who they were violated by: the Pakistani army or by local men.  We always had pregnant girls there. 
         Babies, who the Pakistani army fathered, were all aborted in different clinics.  Otherwise parents couldn’t take the women home.  And they wouldn’t tell anyone if their daughters were raped.  When they realized that their daughters were pregnant they quickly got the babies aborted.  It was all done in secrecy. 
BD: You mentioned that many of the children went to Canada…
RA: Most were sent to Canada.  Some of the babies were sent to France and Sweden as well. 
BD: Have you met any of the Canadian sisters who were working here? 
RA: No.  There were many others who started working in Bangladesh.  But actually we were the first ones to begin work over there. 
BD: During our conversation yesterday you vaguely mentioned a prison where women were kept. Can you tell me more about that? 
RA: No, no! 
BD: Was that in Dhaka? 
RA: Yes, in Dhaka Cantonment.  They were locked up in the Cantonment.  Mother went to see the place.  They took her to see the place.  But not even one girl was there to be seen at that time.  We went with lots of publicity that we were going to work with the girls who had been violated by the Pakistani army.  But when we arrived we found almost no one.  They were all gone.  But we did find lots of babies.  Many of the children were given up for adoption.  We also did a lot of relief work. 
BD: Those were related to women? 
RA: No, in general for everyone.  We also did some rehabilitation work for women on the other side of the Buriganga.[7]  All were Hindu women.  No men, no grown-up boys.  The army killed all the men.  They dug up a big hole where they buried all the men.  And also the grown-up boys.  Women were left alone.  We started a program for helping the women.  I gave each women 5 rupee[8]  to do some small business.  They made a little extra.  Afterwards they continued to work with that small saving.  Then we gave them goose, ducklings, chicks and goats.  For the next three years we helped them to stand on their own feet.  That is how Jagoroni[9] came into being.  It was the “Widows’ Program”.
         For Muslims it was difficult to understand us.  They asked, ‘How can you not get married?  You are violating God’s command.’  Slowly, they also started to understand us through our work.   People were a bit fearful at the beginning.  The Corr[10], Fr. Timm[11]  and Fr. Labe[12] had helped us.
BD: Have you ever worked in any other war-torn country? 
RA: I myself did not.  But others did. 
BD: Was the experience any different from Bangladesh? 
RA: No.  For us, it was nothing new. 
BD: How many of you were there in Bangladesh? 
RA: Six of us were working in Bangladesh.  Rob Chowdhury, the coordinator for rehabilitation work had assisted us.   
BD: Was the number of war babies more in Dhaka? And also the number of abortions? 
RA: Yes.  It still remains as a scar in my heart.  The government allowed abortion on a mass scale.  They didn’t want any Pak child.  Either they were to be aborted or to get out of the country as soon as possible.  We had incubators and we were prepared to take the premature babies. 
BD: Have you requested the women not to abort the children? 
RA: Yes.  We also asked the nursing homes, ‘When the babies are born, please do not throw them to the dustbin.  Bring them to us if they are alive.’  But they didn’t care.  They were interested in the mothers only.  Babies were thrown into the dustbins…you see for any war when they lose the land they want to leave the issue behind.  That is why the Bangladesh government wanted to get rid of the children fathered by the Pakistani army. 
BD: Did the women speak about the actual rape? 
RA: No.  And we also didn’t ask them.  There was a wound.  We tried to rehabilitate them, tried to accept the situation they were in.  And we never asked them to write their names, neither their addresses. Stigma would remain if people knew. 
         Ok.  I am tired.  God bless you. 
BD: Thank you very much for your time.

~
[1] The first orphanage for war babies.
[2] Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the first Prime Minister of the Peoples’ Republic of Bangladesh, who also was called at the time, the father of the nation.
[3] Immediately after the war, there was total chaos in the country.  Law and Order situation was very bad. 
[4] The Relief and Rehabilitation Minister, 1972.
[5] It was clear to me that she didn’t want to reveal any names.
[6] Off the record information about rape by Bengalis.
[7] The major river next to Dhaka city.
[8] Indian currency.
[9] A local handicraft and community shop run by the Missionaries of Charity sisters.
[10] A relief and rehabilitation NGO of East Pakistan.  Now the name has changed to Caritas.
[11] Controversial Human Rights Activist/Priest in Bangladesh. 
[12] One Italian Priest.

India - attempt to change Sharia law

The Background:
 
All India Muslim Personal Law Board was established at a time when then Government of India was trying to subvert Shariah law applicable to Indian Muslims through parallel legislation.Adoption Bill had been tabled in the Parliament. Mr. H.R.Gokhle, then Union Law Minister had termed this Bill as the first step towards Uniform Civil Code. Ulema, leaders and various Muslim organisations successfully convinced the Indian Muslim community that the risk of losing applicability of Shariah laws was real and concerted move by the community was needed to defeat the conspiracy.
It was a historic moment. This was the first time in the history of India after Khilafat Movement that people and organisations of Indian Muslim community belonging to various schools of thought came together on a common platform to defend Muslim Personal Law. First such meeting was convened at Deoband on the initiative of Hazrat Maulana Syed Shah Minnatullah Rahmani, Ameer Shariat, Bihar & Orissa and Hakeemul Islam Hazrat Maulana Qari Mohammad Taiyab, Muhtamim, Darul Uloom, Deoband. The meeting decided to hold a general representative convention at Mumbai. Therefore, a historic convention was held at Mumbai on December 27-28, 1972. The Convention was unprecedented. It showed unity, determination and resolve of the Indian Muslim community to protect the Muslim Personal Law. The Convention unanimously decided to form All India Muslim Personal Law Board.
 
Establishment of the Board:
 
All India Muslim Personal Law Board was established at a time when then Government of India was trying to subvert Shariah law applicable to Indian Muslims through parallel legislation.Adoption Bill had been tabled in the Parliament. Mr. H.R.Gokhle, then Union Law Minister had termed this Bill as the first step towards Uniform Civil Code. Ulema, leaders and various Muslim organisations successfully convinced the Indian Muslim community that the risk of losing applicability of Shariah laws was real and concerted move by the community was needed to defeat the conspiracy.
As per the decision of the Mumbai Convention, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board was formally established at a meeting held at Hyderabad on April 7, 1973. The pioneers of this movement to protect Islamic Shariah in India, Hazrat Maulana Qari Taiyab Qasmi (Rahamatullah aley) and Hazrat Maulana Syed Shah Minnatullah Rahmani (Rahamatullah Aley) were elected founder President and General Secretary of the Board