Home  

How some foreigners sneak out children

How some foreigners sneak out children By Sunday Standard Reporter | Published Sun, June 17th 2018 at 00:00, Updated June 16th 2018 at 21:43 GMT +3 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Foreigners with guardianship orders over Kenyan children have been spiriting them away under the guise of seeking medical attention, a new report on child trafficking says. Courts and children officers have also been cited as facilitators of this form of child trafficking done in defiance of a 2014 moratorium against moving Kenyan children away from the land of their birth. “Most of the applicants for sole custody and movement of children from the country are based on treatment of serious medical conditions but none of the allegations were supported by any medial reports,” says the report Progress on Implementation of the Moratorium on Inter-County and Resident Adoptions dated December 2017. ALSO READ: Woman sues hospital over pre-surgery hunger session The report also says applicants provided unreliable reports to support adoption. In one case, revealed an applicant who claimed to have known a child for 12 years yet the child was only aged 10. In another case, a father to a child is said to have died in 1995 yet the child was born in 2002. “This raises concern over accountability, dismal and casual approach to the children’s well-being, welfare, safety and security by duty managers,” says the report. In its report, the team calls for action against officials named in various court cases of the the intricate wave of child trafficking in the name of adoption of Kenyan children. According to the analysis of the 206 prospective adoption cases, Sweden had the highest number of prospective adoptive parents coming to Kenya. It was followed by the US, Germany and Italy. From 63 cases analysed from the courts, the committee found that 44 cases were filled in the high courts in Nairobi, Mombasa and Kisumu after the moratorium of November 26, 2016. Of these, 20 children were placed for inter-country adoption after the moratorium, contrary to the Cabinet decision. “This means some children are declared free of adoption when they are not adoptable,” the report says. In all the 49 cases, the report says, there was no evidence of tracing done prior to declaring children free for adoption. The report questions the reason for offering all “available’ cases for adoption to other countries yet there were local parents willing to take up the children. The team found that some foreigners were offered more than one child within a span of two years, while the the list of Kenyans waiting to adopt children was as high as 440. The team attributed this to the fact the the foreigners paid more for adoption.

Read more at: https://www.standardmedia.co.ke/article/2001284375/how-some-foreigners-sneak-out-children

HC says preserve all adoption orders as it can’t find '97 do .. Read more at: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/6

HC says preserve all adoption orders as it can’t find '97 do ..

HC says preserve all adoption orders as it can’t find '97 document

TNN | Jun 17, 2018, 05.14 AM IST

HC says preserve all adoption orders as it can’t find '97 document

MUMBAI: The Bombay high court has directed its registry to maintain, in perpetuity, all court orders and records related to Indian or international adoptions. These are vital documents affecting the rights of adoptees, said Justice Gautam Patel.

Family portrait

Family portrait

Purnank has close to 300 members from Pune, Mumbai and across the globe, who stay connected on WhatsApp. The Pune members meet almost every month

A city-based support group for adoptive parents and their children is shaping a new narrative for Indian families

Prospective adoptive parents have all of 48 hours to make the decision to adopt a child who has been referred to them. Often, the medical reports of a referral, as a child who is up for adoption is addressed in legal terms, are not up to date. Taking the all-important decision of bringing a new member into a family without complete clarity on a fundamental issue such as physical or mental health then becomes a challenge. In 2015, the Union Ministry of Women and Child Development decided to change the adoption procedure by authorising the Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA) to monitor the system instead of letting local adoption agencies to continue controlling the process. While the move was an attempt to make the system more efficient, it meant that local NGOs and agencies were absolved of any role in supporting parents. “I realised then that support from adoptive parents would be helpful and more authentic for those waiting for their adoption to come through,” says Sangeeta Baginwar, a 46-year-old single adoptive mother, who founded Poornank, a forum of, and for, adoptive parents and children. There are close to 300 members in the group from Pune, Mumbai and across the globe, who stay connected on WhatsApp. There are six different groups on WhatsApp, tells us Baginwar, each dedicated to parents at various stages of adoption — from the pre-adoption stage, to a group focused on parents of young children between the ages of 1 and 6, 6–12, 12–18 and 18 onwards, to single parents, and one group of adopted children.

Earlier this month, some members of Poornank and their children met over lunch. “Members from Pune have been meeting almost every month,” says Baginwar, “At the last meeting, one of the concerns that came up was single mothers discussing how to tackle the question, ‘Where’s our father?, from their children.” Baginwar, an education expert, who organises science exhibitions that include robotics and experiential mathematics, says that children are more accepting of other adopted children. “If you tell them that another child doesn’t have a father just as some children don’t have a brother or a sister, they just accept the idea and move on,” says Amita Marathe, another single mother, who adopted a girl with a congenital heart defect who is now completely cured. Baginwar, who is homeschooling her seven-year-old daughter, Nimisha, speaks from experience. “There are some schools that discriminate against adopted children. I used to know a girl who excelled at Bharatanatyam but was not allowed to perform because she was adopted and not doing well academically,” she says. Nimisha was once told at school that she had two mothers. “I believe that nobody except the parents have a right to discuss this aspect of their life with their adopted children, but having said that, if the school wants to raise the subject, then they should be ready to deal with answering any question that the parent or child has for them,” she says, her eyes flashing with anger at the memory.

Family portrait

Family portrait

Purnank has close to 300 members from Pune, Mumbai and across the globe, who stay connected on WhatsApp. The Pune members meet almost every month

A city-based support group for adoptive parents and their children is shaping a new narrative for Indian families

Prospective adoptive parents have all of 48 hours to make the decision to adopt a child who has been referred to them. Often, the medical reports of a referral, as a child who is up for adoption is addressed in legal terms, are not up to date. Taking the all-important decision of bringing a new member into a family without complete clarity on a fundamental issue such as physical or mental health then becomes a challenge. In 2015, the Union Ministry of Women and Child Development decided to change the adoption procedure by authorising the Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA) to monitor the system instead of letting local adoption agencies to continue controlling the process. While the move was an attempt to make the system more efficient, it meant that local NGOs and agencies were absolved of any role in supporting parents. “I realised then that support from adoptive parents would be helpful and more authentic for those waiting for their adoption to come through,” says Sangeeta Baginwar, a 46-year-old single adoptive mother, who founded Poornank, a forum of, and for, adoptive parents and children. There are close to 300 members in the group from Pune, Mumbai and across the globe, who stay connected on WhatsApp. There are six different groups on WhatsApp, tells us Baginwar, each dedicated to parents at various stages of adoption — from the pre-adoption stage, to a group focused on parents of young children between the ages of 1 and 6, 6–12, 12–18 and 18 onwards, to single parents, and one group of adopted children.

Earlier this month, some members of Poornank and their children met over lunch. “Members from Pune have been meeting almost every month,” says Baginwar, “At the last meeting, one of the concerns that came up was single mothers discussing how to tackle the question, ‘Where’s our father?, from their children.” Baginwar, an education expert, who organises science exhibitions that include robotics and experiential mathematics, says that children are more accepting of other adopted children. “If you tell them that another child doesn’t have a father just as some children don’t have a brother or a sister, they just accept the idea and move on,” says Amita Marathe, another single mother, who adopted a girl with a congenital heart defect who is now completely cured. Baginwar, who is homeschooling her seven-year-old daughter, Nimisha, speaks from experience. “There are some schools that discriminate against adopted children. I used to know a girl who excelled at Bharatanatyam but was not allowed to perform because she was adopted and not doing well academically,” she says. Nimisha was once told at school that she had two mothers. “I believe that nobody except the parents have a right to discuss this aspect of their life with their adopted children, but having said that, if the school wants to raise the subject, then they should be ready to deal with answering any question that the parent or child has for them,” she says, her eyes flashing with anger at the memory.

Report lays bare how child theft syndicates thrive

Report lays bare how child theft syndicates thrive

Saturday Standard Reporter |

Published Sat, June 16th 2018

A four-year-old girl from Liberia, West Africa, holding a sign that reads "not for sale".

A government team has exposed new chilling details of a thriving child theft racket involving adoption societies, charities, state officers, police officers, lawyers and social workers, all eyeing vulnerable children. In a report handed to President Uhuru Kenyatta in December last year and accessed by the Saturday Standard Friday, child experts vouch for definite ban on inter-country adoption, citing numerous cases of abuse and theft of children.

Couples in live-in relations cannot adopt, says CARA

Indian family at outdoor. Rear view of parents and children walking on garden path. Exploring nature, leisure lifestyle.

Indian family at outdoor. Rear view of parents and children walking on garden path. Exploring nature, leisure lifestyle.

‘Cohabitation not considered a stable family in India’

The nodal body for adoption in the country has barred partners in live-in relationships from adopting a child on the ground that cohabitation without marriage is not considered a stable family in India.

The Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA) permits a single woman to adopt a child of any gender, while single men can adopt only boys.

Prey children Investigation (CC BY-NC-ND): Olivier Bailly Illustrations (CC BY-NC-ND): Orfee Grandhomme

In 2012, the Wallonia-Brussels Federation entered into a partnership with the non-profit association Tumaini to organize the adoption of Congolese children. The outlook was promising. The fiasco is complete. Excessive fees, false documents, abuse, theft of children: this is the worst part of adoption.

" I am called Anna. It was written that I am 5 years old but it is not true. I am 4 years old and I was woken up. We got off the plane. A long clean hallway. This metallic gray airport with lots of white people. I have never seen so many. We are eleven children to have boarded the plane, to have left the Tumaini house, in Kinshasa. Without even saying goodbye to Uncle Kitambo.

We are then all gathered in a room, black children and white parents. There are games, presentations. A lady wears, like me, a flower on a sign attached around her neck. She talks to me. I do not understand. I'm playing. Then everyone leaves. Big whites with little blacks. The lady with the sign wants to go with me. I am the only one crying. So the big brother who had accompanied us so that we wouldn't be afraid of the plane said not to cry, he said that they would come and get me.

I believed him. For a week, every morning, I hit the lady. I got dressed, I put on my panties, my socks, my shoes, my pants, my T-shirt, my jacket. I tied my hair in a rubber band and put on my backpack. I positioned myself in front of the window. From the second floor of this lady's house, we could clearly see the crossroads. I waited. No one came to pick me up. It wasn't true.

When I could speak French. I told the lady. "You're not my mom. I have one in the village.” While painting my dolls, I told her about Gemena, my sisters, my parents. She said to me: “I think you are confusing my darling. She is a lady who behaved like a mother.” But it's not true. My parents live in Congo. My anger was to survive. She left. A little. With time. The lady became my adoptive mother.

Prey children

In 2012, the Wallonia-Brussels Federation entered into a partnership with the non-profit organization Tumaini to organize the adoption of Congolese children. The outlook was promising. The fiasco is complete. Excessive fees, false documents, abuse, theft of children: this is the worst part of adoption.

" I am called Anna. It was written that I am 5 years old but it is not true. I am 4 years old and I was woken up. We got off the plane. A long clean hallway. This metallic gray airport with lots of white people. I have never seen so many. We are eleven children to have boarded the plane, to have left the Tumaini house, in Kinshasa. Without even saying goodbye to Uncle Kitambo.

We are then all gathered in a room, black children and white parents. There are games, presentations. A lady wears, like me, a flower on a sign attached around her neck. She talks to me. I do not understand. I'm playing. Then everyone leaves. Big whites with little blacks. The lady with the sign wants to go with me. I am the only one crying. So the big brother who had accompanied us so that we wouldn't be afraid of the plane said not to cry, he said that they would come and get me.

I believed him. For a week, every morning, I hit the lady. I got dressed, I put on my panties, my socks, my shoes, my pants, my T-shirt, my jacket. I tied my hair in a rubber band and put on my backpack. I positioned myself in front of the window. From the second floor of this lady's house, we could clearly see the crossroads. I waited. No one came to pick me up. It wasn't true.

When I could speak French. I told the lady. "You're not my mom. I have one in the village.” While painting my dolls, I told her about Gemena, my sisters, my parents. She said to me: “I think you are confusing my darling. She is a lady who behaved like a mother.” But it's not true. My parents live in Congo. My anger was to survive. She left. A little. With time. The lady became my adoptive mother.