Home  

MEDIA: Sierra Leone Parents Seek Answers In Adoption Case

Saturday, June 5, 2010

MEDIA: Sierra Leone Parents Seek Answers In Adoption Case
PEAR has been contacted by a family who believes that their adopted child is one of the children in this article. The family is exploring options for contact with the child's family. If you believe that your adopted child may also be one of the children and would like to contact this family, please let us know and we will put you in touch.


Sierra Leone Parents Seek Children Adopted By Americans In Late 1990s, Saying No Consent Given

(AP) FREETOWN, Sierra Leone (AP) - Balia Kamara's mother sent her to a center in northern Sierra Leone so the 5-year-old could receive an education and food, and stay out of harm's way during the West African country's brutal civil war.

The mother visited Balia at the Help A Needy Child International center, known as HANCI, regularly for two years until 1998, when the children there were taken to Sierra Leone's capital for medical examinations. They never returned.

Parents of about 30 children at the center say they only later learned that the children had been adopted by Americans and sent abroad without permission.

"We were reluctant to hand over the child," recalled Balia's mother, Mariama Jabbie, in an interview with The Associated Press. "When they told us that they were going to educate her up to college level, we decided to hand her over. That was how they were able to entice us to do so."
In 2004, the center's director and two of his employees were arrested and charged with conspiracy to violate adoption laws. Those charges against them though ultimately were dropped and the case disbanded, according to court records.

Now more than a decade after the children disappeared, Sierra Leone's government said late Wednesday it is setting up a national commission of inquiry to re-examine the case of the HANCI children following years of pressure from their biological parents.

The American agency that facilitated the children's adoptions maintains it has no knowledge of any wrongdoing on the part of their staff in the West African nation.

Last month, the children's biological parents stormed the office of Sierra Leone's social welfare minister, demanding the government help them find a way to communicate with their children. A spokesman for the parents, Kassim Kargbo, said they had traveled from villages in the north nearly 100 miles from the capital.

The parents also published an open letter to President Ernest Bai Koroma in a local newspaper. They asked Sierra Leone's government to reopen the case against those who ran the HANCI center where the children were staying.

Sierra Leone is not the only country where there has been controversy over whether parents have given sufficient consent for adoptions. Guatemala suspended international adoptions for nearly two years after the discovery that some babies were being sold.

In Argentina, the government confirmed that hundreds of children were taken from dissidents and raised by military families or others that supported the ruling military junta in the 1970s and early 1980s. El Salvador has worked to reunite children who were also separated from their families during that country's civil war and adopted by foreign families.

The HANCI adoption case in Sierra Leone began amid the country's devastating decade-long war that ended in 2002, a conflict dramatized in the film "Blood Diamond."

Rebels burned villages, raped women and turned kidnapped children into drugged teenage fi ghters.Tensofthousandsofciviliansdiedandcountlessotherswereleftmutilatedafterrebels cut off body parts with machetes. The U.S. State Department says 134 children were adopted between 1999 and 2003, the year after the war ended.

Abu Bakarr, who is now the coordinator for the birth parents of the adopted children, said that the HANCI center in Makeni refused to return the children to their parents in 1998. Those who ran HANCI said reducing the number of children at the center would affect its funding, Bakarr said.

HANCI ultimately contacted Maine Adoption Placement Services (MAPS) to foster U.S. adoptions, and MAPS says it placed 29 of the 33 children from the home with adoptive parents in the U.S. HANCI maintains the parents gave informed consent. It said the agreements also were taken to Makeni's magistrate court for clearance

"It was made clear to the parents that all the children kept at the center were for adoption," HANCI said in a statement released late last year. "Each parent completed and signed a document to the effect."

When reached by The Associated Press, Maine Adoption Placement Services' chief executive officer said she stood by earlier statements about the case.

"MAPS has no knowledge of any wrongdoing on the part of our Sierra Leone staff and are cooperating fully with the investigation," Stephanie Mitchell said.

The legal process for the adoptions was approved at the time by Sierra Leone's government, as well as by the U.S. State Department, she said. "We've heard nothing officially from anyone from Sierra Leone for years," she added.

But the children's birth parents say that adoption was never mentioned, nor was a trip out of the country. For years they never knew what had become of the children and feared they may have been killed during the war. Not until 2004 did they learn they were adopted by Americans, Bakarr said.

"I only thumb-printed the form to the effect that the center was going to take care of my two children," said Pa Brima Kargbo, whose 6-year-old daughter Adama and 3-year-old son Mustapha were placed at the center. "Now we want to see our children whether they are dead or alive, even if it is for two days."

Chuck Johnson, the acting CEO of the National Council for Adoption, said Sierra Leone requires annual post-adoption reports until the child reaches the age of 18.

Mitchell said MAPS has been diligent in sending annual post-placement reports, along with photos of the adopted kids, to authorities in Sierra Leone as required.

"We can produce copies of those," she said. "We've been very rigorous."

While Sierra Leone is opening a national commission of inquiry, it is highly unlikely to bring the closure the birth parents are seeking. Mitchell said if the government requests contact be established between the adoptive families and birth families: "I think they would have the right to say no."

Johnson doubts the U.S. would try to enforce anything beyond the post-adoption report requirement.

"It would be up to the agency to try and convince adoptive families to do more than initially required of them," he said.

It's been nearly 15 years since Sulaiman Suma last saw his 4-year-old daughter Mabinty and 3-year-old son Sulaiman. Both are now young adults believed to be living in the United States.
"We want our children who were sold to these white people," Suma said. "We want to know whether they are alive or dead."
___
Carley Petesch reported from Johannesburg. Associated Press Writer David Crary in New York contributed to this report.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/06/03/ap/africa/main6544354.shtml

Ethics, Transparency, Support
~ What All Adoptions Deserve.
http://www.pear-now.org/

Anke Hassel - new member PEAR Open Forum

From: Anke Hassel

Date: July 5, 2010 6:24:29 AM ADT

To: "PEARopenforum@yahoogroups.com"

Subject: [PEARopenforum] New member

Reply-To: PEARopenforum@yahoogroups.com

Local filmmaker explores foreign adoption

Local filmmaker explores foreign adoption

-->-->
By Michelle J. Mills, Staff Writer
-->

Fake orphanage chief arrested for selling HIV-infected child

Fake orphanage chief arrested for selling HIV-infected child
Reporter
Friday, June 04, 2010 AT 07:04 PM (IST)
Tags: Orphanage
-->

Moratorium Imposed on Adoptions from Nepal

Jun 04, 2010 14:38 ET
Moratorium Imposed on Adoptions from Nepal


OTTAWA, ONTARIO--(Marketwire - June 4, 2010) - Canadian adoptions from Nepal have been suspended due to concerns about fraud and child trafficking.

A recent report by the Hague Conference on Private International Law revealed that there is strong evidence that documents are being falsified on a regular basis and false statements are regularly made about a child's origins, age and status – and whether they have been abandoned.

Based on this evidence, and the recommendations of Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) and with the support of Human Resources and Skills Development Canada (HRSDC), the provinces and territories have agreed to suspend adoptions from Nepal.

Provinces and territories are responsible for approving adoptions. CIC is responsible for granting the adopted child citizenship or allowing them to immigrate as a permanent resident. HRSDC's role is to encourage communications and co-operation with provincial and territorial, federal, and foreign government counterparts in the adoption community.

"We know how disheartening this must be for the parents concerned, but several authoritative sources, such as The Hague Conference and UNICEF, have raised serious concerns about the use of fraudulent documents and the prevalence of child trafficking in Nepal," said Jason Kenney, Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism. "It is important to get a reformed system in place in Nepal before proceeding with adoptions."

Proceeding with adoption cases from Nepal could violate Canada's obligations under The Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoptions. Both CIC and HRSDC work in close coordination with provincial and territorial adoption authorities and are monitoring the situation in Nepal.

"There are a number of Canadian parents seeking to adopt children from Nepal who are understandably anxious but our priorities remain the best interests of the child and the prevention of child trafficking," added Minister Kenney.

Follow us on Twitter at: www.twitter.com/CitImmCanada

http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Moratorium-Imposed-on-Adoptions-from-Nepal-1271467.htm 
 

‘Rights activist’, priests in child trafficking ring

‘Rights activist’, priests in child trafficking ring

June 4th, 2010

June 3: The child trafficking racket run by a priest from his church in Padappai near Chennai, busted by the police recently, has turned out to be much larger than the cops initially believed.

A Krishnagiri police special team has picked up the woman head of a purported human rights group from Puducherry for being part of the trafficking ring and arrested a second priest, Selvam, who investigating officials say was in cahoots with racket mastermind Alphonse Xavier. Selvam runs a church in Villupuram district.

Investigators now believe that the sinister nexus between the priests and the human rights group could have been responsible for at least a dozen more cases of child abduction. The police also said investigations indicated that the child trafficking ring could have a Chennai link.

“We have arrested six people including two priests and three women in connection with cases of missing children in our district,” said a senior Krishnagiri police officer on Thursday. “We have also picked up a woman who claims to be the head of a self-styled human rights outfit.”

The trafficking ring was exposed after Ramakka, a woman from Hosur, lodged a complaint with the police about the abduction of her 3-month-old son on May 18. She said a woman who had befriended her had kidnapped the child from the Krishnagiri bus stand.

The cops zeroed in on the suspect, Danalakshmi, the next morning but she had already handed over the child to two women from Perambur. “We then traced the child in Perambur and arrested three people there,” the officer said. Dhanalakshmi confessed to have stolen a 3-year-old boy who was reported missing in December 2009 and said that the child had been handed over to a Alphonse Xavier for Rs 5000. Xavier and Selvam had sold the child to a family in Ginjee. “We arrested the priests and traced the boy, who was reunited with his parents last week,” the Krishnagiri officer said.

Meanwhile, state government officials, continuing their drive to identify unlicensed orphanages, on Wednesday rescued 17 children from an illegal home in Nagercoil.

No takers for kids with HIV, no adoption in 2008-’09

Adoption centres and foster care homes are finding it extremely difficult to place children living with HIV for adoption.

According to Madhuri Abhyankar, director, Society of Friends of Sassoon General hospital (SOFOSH), most adoption centres will have at least one or two children who have HIV. In 2008-09, the number of HIV positive children adopted was nil.

“We could place only one child for adoption a few years ago and that too in a family of doctors who were aware of the problems of the illness,” says Abhyankar. Like SOFOSH, other centres, like the Bharatiya Samaj Seva Kendra (BSSK), too find it a challenging task to place HIV positive children for adoption.

Says Roxanne Kalyanwala, executive director of BSSK, “at present, there is not a single HIV positive child among the 70 at our adoption centre. Couples who have been unable to conceive and finally decided to adopt want a normal healthy child. We have had a few children who had HIV. As they were not placed anywhere, we had to send them to Manavya — an NGO that runs a home for HIV children at Bhugaon.”

In 2008-09, a total of 299 children were adopted from eight institutions in the city. A total of 107 were from BSSK, 79 from SOFOSH, 38 from Preet Mandir, 36 from Renuka Mahajan Trust, 18 from Priyadarshini Shishu Gruha, 4 from Pandita Ramabai Mukti Mission and 17 from Sakar. A total of 54 children from these institutions were placed at homes abroad.

About René Hoksbergen

 

René Hoksbergen

 

René Hoksbergen studied social psychology at Amsterdam University and earned a Ph.D. on adult education . Employed at Utrecht University, senior professor since 1984. Visiting professor Institute of Psychology, Pune, India, 1998 till present  also on adoption. Between 1978-1982 he was personal advisor to the Minister of Education of India.

Emeritus professor, 2005, still working on contract basis at Utrecht University, director of the Adoption Department of the Faculty of Social Sciences. Main research projects:  History of adoption of children in Holland, motives of adoptive parents, attachment issues, evaluation of adoption of children from Thailand longitudinal study, causes of adoption failures, effects of neglect and abuse (Romanian adoptive children), foetal alcohol syndrome by adoptive Polish children.

He has written himself or together with colleagues about 30 books, and a large number of articles in scientific and other journals, in USA, Great Britain, Germany and France. He still gives lectures in many countries. Appears often for discussions concerning adoption issues on television, radio and others.

 

Adopting Alex

Adopting Alex

if you asked most parents to describe their experience of an international adoption, they’d probably respond with words like, “it was…complicated, convoluted, bureaucratic, frustrating…tedious.”

I’m probably not typical.

I would describe my experience of an international adoption from India as an adventure…an exotic foray into an ancient Asian culture.

Our story begins in ways similar to most couples that choose to adopt. We were infertile. After nine miscarriages, we made the decision to adopt a child from the country of my husband’s birth. My husband, George, is from Bangalore, in the southern part of India. Adoption from India seemed a natural choice to build our cross-cultural family. Unfortunately, adoption is a foreign concept in the Indian community and my 72-year-old mother-in-law was slow to offer encouragement.

Despite these sentiments, we forged ahead. By May of 1997, we began the long process of international adoption with Wide Horizons for Children, a 22-year-old adoption agency in Waltham, MA. Our caseworker, Homai Schmidt, was an Indian woman from New Delhi. Homai would coordinate the process of international adoption between an American couple, the orphanage in Pune, in the west of India, the Indian government and the INS.

Homai encouraged us to initiate adoption under The Hindu Adoption Act. The Hindu Adoption Act assisted non-resident Indians who lived outside the country in completing the adoption of an Indian baby. My husband was a non-resident Indian who was living in the U.S. and had recently acquired his green card. The time was ripe for an international adoption.

After the beginning, the process was very similar to most other international adoptions. We wrote our autobiographies, endured a lengthy home study complete with home inspections and family histories. We underwent thorough physical exams including an AIDS test and of course, we were fingerprinted by the FBI.

But that’s not what made an impression of me…my fingers, maybe, but not my heart.

George and I made the decision to travel to India and escort our child home. It was this journey that changed my life. After 9 months of endless paperwork, drafting affidavits of financial solvency and adequate health insurance, we received a referral for a 4 month-old baby boy named Amod. Amod is a Hindi name meaning precious.

Three months later, on May 11, 1999, we arrive in Pune, in the west of India near Bombay. We hail down an auto rickshaw, or three-wheeled motorized taxi, in the heart of this dusty city. Our auto rickshaw speeds down unpaved roads and swerves around sitting cows at the heart of every intersection. We dodged veiled women and servant girls wrapped in threadbare saris balancing bamboo baskets on their heads.

We arrive at SAFOOSH, the hospital and orphanage where our Amod was born three months earlier. Jyothi Rungi, Amod’s Hindu caseworker, meets us at the hospital entrance. Wrapped in a colorful silk sari and adorned with a red bindi on her forehead, Joythi escorts us to her office. We pour over Amod’s medical records in this tiny cement-walled office, painted a dull hospital green and poorly lit by blinking fluorescents. I hear a little cry and look up to see a thin, dark-faced nurse holding Amod at the door.

As my eyes settle on baby Amod for the first time, I experience an unexpected jolt of…panic! A series of disjointed thoughts swim through my head. He looks so frail…is he healthy? Why is his hair matted down on his head? Why is he so tiny? Why is he dressed in shorts that are too big for him? Why isn’t he smiling…doesn’t he like me?

After frantic conversations with the social worker and nurse, I am reassured that Amod is a normal and healthy baby boy who will just need time to settle into a comfortable routine with his new Mom and Dad.

In a whirlwind of papers and forms, Amod’s social worker takes us on a brief tour of the orphanage. We enter a long, tiled room with 50 cribs lined up on each side. A cluster of tiny nurses in white saris flutter between cribs changing and feeding the babies. This was where Amod had spent the first seven months of his life. Now, he’d be coming home with us!

We return to the office to learn about Amod’s birth parents. We see a picture of Amod’s birth mother with her parents. As a 17 year old girl attending university, Amod’s birth mother had become unexpectedly pregnant. She chose to put her baby up for adoption. At the age of 19, and with our permission, Amod will be able to see her picture.

Jyothi walks us thru a Hindu farewell ceremony. Spreading red henna along my parting hairline, she leads me, George and Amod in a circle for the blessing. As I soothe Amod, we’re packed into an auto richshaw at the hospital entrance and sent home to George’s cousin in Pune.

That first night with the baby was unsettling for us all. Amod cries constantly and refuses to be consoled. He has an ear infection and is running a low-grade fever. Infectious conditions were common in Indian orphanages, but completely treatable.

Early the next morning, we took a flight to Bangalore, in the south of India to meet with George’s mother, brothers, nieces and nephews. In a flurry of flowing silk saris, curried India meats and Darjeeling teas, baby Amod was embraced by loving relatives. A whirlwind of family visits, picture- taking and baptismal preparations began.

With the loving care and doting attention that only an Indian family can give, Amod was showered with gold jewelry, silk kurtaWelcome home (CUR-TA) pajamas and stuffed animals and rattles made only in India. We establish a daily routine of bathing Amod in a bucket in the tiled bathroom. Indians do not have bathtubs. They fill buckets for soaping and rinsing. His aunts begin to feed him milk, rice and dah. Dah is a lentil, high in protein and easy to swallow when cooked with milk and rice.

As our social worker predicted, Amod was not easily soothed during that first week. He needed a period of time to adjust to a white woman who speaks English. Even his Indian aunts speak Malayalam, a language of southern India and not Marathi, a western language spoken in the orphanage.

After Amod’s christening, we became frequent visitors to the Indian Embassy for review of our guardianship documents. After one week, we did get a passport for Amod to travel home to the U.S. Amod would become Alexander six months later when the adoption became final. We’d always call him Alex.

We boarded an international flight home. Although Amod was clinging to us and starting to smile, he slept fitfully in an infant crib. Twenty-two hours later, we landed in JFK. We arrived home in Connecticut at 4am. I paused at the doorstep with Amod in my arms while George snapped a “Welcome Home” picture.

We finally brought Alex home.