Home  

Netherlands To Lift Adoption Ban

Netherlands To Lift Adoption Ban
By Rex Wockner
Published: March 17, 2005
A bill introduced in the Netherlands’ Parliament March 9 will lift the ban on adoption of foreign babies by same-sex couples. Such couples already have adoption rights for babies living within the country. The bill, which was introduced by a coalition representing a parliamentary majority, is expected to pass.
“However, not many intercountry adoptions by same-sex couples would take place, since hardly any country in the world allows their children to be adopted by Dutch same-sex couples,” said activist Kees Waaldijk. In 2001, the Netherlands became the first nation to legalize full marriage for same-sex couples.

Report of the Federal Council on adoptions in Switzerland (Response to Hubmann's postulate "Report on the adoptions")

Dear Presidents,Ladies and Gentlemen,On June 17, 2005, the National Council adopted the Hubmann postulateFederal Council commissioned to present a report on Swiss adoption practice. This report corresponds to the concerns of the National Council.We therefore request that you write off the following postulate as completed:2005 P 05.3138 Report on the adoptions (03/17/2005, Hubmann)We assure you, Mr. Presidents, ladies and gentlemen, of oursexcellent respect.... On behalf of the Swiss Federal CouncilThe Federal President: Moritz LeuenbergerThe Chancellor: Annemarie Huber-Hotz

Re: [romania_eu_list] SOS FLORENTINA PINI!

Re: [romania_eu_list] SOS FLORENTINA PINI!

Fundatia Noua Speranta

Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:19:23 -0800

Adoptia a fost facuta pe legea veche care era in vigoare atunci, in 2000, acum cinci ani! De asta este o asemenea lupta! Sentinta este irevocabila si definitiva! Este un caz ca al oricarui copil care a fost adoptat legal de o familie din strainatate. Copilul are si certificat de nastere dat pe numele de PINI, ovbtinut de cateva zile de la starea civila.

Av. Ionita

"Illegal adoptions and influence peddling in county councils"

"Illegal adoptions and influence peddling in county councils"

Coroama Ilie case - criminal case having as object the verification of some indications regarding acts of corruption committed on the occasion of approving international adoptions of minor children. Through the "Love Basket" foundation from Bistrita Nasaud, Ilie Coroama made several illegal "exports" of children in the USA, entering the SRI's sights, but without any result.

Through a well-established network of civil servants and local government officials, Coroama has managed to develop a quasi-legal system through which, despite drastic restrictions, children are taken out of the country and sent to Protestant families. without their psycho-motor development being subsequently re-evaluated.

.

Fapt divers: Declara?ii ?oc: Sechestrat? în casa lui ?iriac

Fapt divers: Declara?ii ?oc: Sechestrat? în casa lui ?iriac

Dezv?luiri ?ocante în scandalul orfelinatului lui ?iriac din Bra?ov. Florentina Goroh, fata care a fugit din centrul de plasament „Poiana Soarelui”, a declarat c? a fost ascuns? de c?tre omul de afaceri chiar în una din casele sale, pentru a nu fi prezent? la întâlnirile cu p?rin?ii adoptivi.

Ieri s-a derulat un nou episod în scandalul iscat în jurul Florentinei Goroh, feti?a care a atras aten?ia asupra adop?iilor interna?ionale „sabotate” de miliardarul Ion ?iriac. R?spunzând la cererea ei, Direc?ia de Asisten?? Social? ?i Protec?ia Drepturilor Copilului (DGASPDC) a facilitat întâlnirea cu cuplul italian Carlo Pini ?i Annalisa Bertani, p?rin?ii adoptivi. Mai târziu, Florentina a f?cut declara?ii ?ocante despre modul în care era tratat? de c?tre gardienii de la Centrul de Plasament „Poiana Soarelui”, apar?inând binecunoscutului om de afaceri Ion ?iriac, care obi?nuia s? o ascund? în vilele proprii.

Întâlnire intim?… în public

Întâlnirea a avut loc la sediul Direc?iei. Evenimentul s-a l?sat a?teptat atât de Florentina, cât ?i de cuplul italian Carlo Pini ?i Annalisa Bertani, care nu au mai v?zut-o pe feti?? din toamna anului 2001. „Am avut mari emo?ii. A venit ?i ne-a spus «mami, tati sunt fericit? c? pot s? v? v?d». Nu am vorbit foarte multe pentru c? timpul a fost scurt”, ne-au declarat italienii, prin intermediul unui translator.

Foreigners Vie to Adopt Black U.S. Babies

Foreigners Vie to Adopt Black U.S. Babies

Whether From Lack of Knowledge, Stigmas or Racism, Americans Seem Hesitant to Adopt Across Racial Lines

OTTAWA, March 5, 2005 —

 

When Allison Darke goes out in public with her adoptive son, Ethan, people notice certain things.

"They notice he's a baby and cute," she said. "They think my husband is black."

Ethan was born to black parents in Chicago, but will spend most of his life growing up with Darke and her second husband, Earl Stroud, a white couple living in the Canadian capital.

The State Department says the number of Americans adopting babies from overseas has more than doubled in the last 10 years, with couples often citing a dearth of American babies.

But there are plenty of American babies who need homes -- African-American babies. And more and more of those children are finding homes abroad, especially in Canada, according to people who work in the U.S. adoption field.

"I just don't understand why American couples go to China and Romania and places like that," Stroud said, "when they have kids in their own back yards."

 

'All the Same Joy'

 

For Stroud and Darke, Ethan is the shining light at the end of a long tunnel of hope. Darke had two children from her first marriage, but she and Stroud wanted to have a child together. They had tried to conceive and then to adopt a child, at first without success.

Then came Ethan. Darke has been with him since the day he was born. She was with his biological mother when she gave birth.

"It's incredible," she said. "It's no different than if it was your own. It's all the same joy, all the same love, all the same desires and dreams and wishes right from the beginning. It's just instant -- the bond is just instant. And then there's the bond that you have with the woman as she goes through a very painful experience, a very joyous but also a very sad moment for her, because now it's the beginning of an end."

Margaret Fleming, who runs Adoption Link, a service in Chicago specializing in placing African-American babies, said the group in recent years has placed Ethan and more than 700 children -- many of them with overseas families in Germany, Switzerland, England and Canada.

For every Caucasian child in the United States, there are at least 200 families in line, waiting two to three times as long as they would if they adopted a black baby, according to Adoption Link.

"At the very top of the adoption hierarchy are white, blue-eyed, blond-haired girls," Fleming said. "And unfortunately, at the very bottom of the hierarchy are African-American boys."

 

Stigmas, 'Racism'

 

Fleming not only places black children, she has adopted five herself. But there are stigmas involved.

Arranging transracial adoptions was made more difficult in 1972, Fleming said, when the National Association of Black Social Workers declared placing black children with white families a form of "cultural genocide."

"I think the power of that statement has decreased markedly only of late," Fleming said. "We've had some families tell us, 'I didn't know I could adopt a black child.' "

But there seems to be more than lack of awareness on the part of some prospective white American parents.

"A main reason a lot of times is racism, frankly," said Michelle Hughes, an adoption attorney who, as head of Bridge Communications, counsels parents adopting across racial lines. "Parents will actually say, 'I'll take anything but an African-American child.'

"The truth of the matter is that a lot of the other countries are perhaps not as racist," she said. "And you have white parents [from other countries] coming here to get black kids on a regular basis."

All sides of the adoption equation see that fact as an opportunity. The hope that her biological son would grow up in a less-prejudiced society was one of the reasons Ethan's birth mother picked the family in Canada.

Darke said her son's race won't make any difference in how she rears him.

"Regardless of whether Ethan is black or white, you need to keep your doors open," she said. "You need to put out a smorgasbord of opportunity and allow them to choose. And it has nothing to do with his skin color, and that's just the way you have to raise them, period."

The rest of the family doesn't see it as an issue.

"For me personally, it didn't bother me at all," said Sara, Darke's teenage daughter. "I don't look at him and think that he's black."

 

Love Not Color Blind?

 

But some suggest that might be taking things a bit too far.

"People who think that love is color blind, that race won't be an issue, are naive," Hughes said.

Phil Bertelsen -- a black filmmaker in New York who grew up in a loving, multiracial New Jersey family -- said his upbringing almost created a cocoon of protection from the reality of race in the world around him. He began examining that issue in his film called "Outside Looking In," about transracial adoption and the impact it had on his sense of cultural identity.

"It was a challenge facing the discord outside the home," Bertelsen said, "when all you had experienced was something else."

While progressive-minded adoptive parents may be well intentioned in the idea that race doesn't matter, Bertelsen said, being completely color blind can be dangerous and damaging.

"That difference is worth acknowledging and not ignoring," he said, "because when you ignore my race or my ethnicity, you are essentially taking away a part of who I am."

Ethan's parents said they are trying to read the books, take the courses and build a community including black friends and an environment that will allow their son to have a conversation about race as soon as he is ready.

"He is one day going to realize by our hands being together," she said. "I'm holding his hand walking down the street and he's going to know."

"We'll just have to take it as it comes," Stroud said.

Reporter Hari Sreenivasan and producer Nils Kongshaug originally reported this story for "World News Tonight" on Feb. 27, 2005, and for ABC News Now.

 

Romania: Meeing with Ambassador Ducaru

Romania: Meeing with Ambassador Ducaru
Posted on March 3, 2005 by Joint Council
03/10/2005
Joint Council attended a meeting at Romanian Ambassador Ducaru’s residence with President Basescu. The meeting consisted of about 20 – 30 people, mostly adoptive parents and waiting parents, two representatives from the Department of State, one other NGO and Joint Council. We were very honored to have been invited to the meeting and the President was very gracious to share his time. He was very warm and seemed empathic to the cause. The purpose of the meeting was for him to hear from adoptive parents and those, such as Joint Council, advocating for the pending cases to be processed. The President did mention that the U.S. has the largest number of pending cases – approximately 200, and other countries such as France, Spain, Israel, and Germany also have pipeline cases. While no specifics were addressed we are hopeful that the pending cases will be processed soon. He did also mention that international adoptions were discussed in his meeting on Wednesday with President Bush, but again, no specifics were addressed.
Request to all families who adopted from Romania between 2000 and 2004
Please make sure that your post placement reports are filed. It is important that post-placement reports are forwarded to the proper Romanian government officials. For more information please contact Tatiana Maxim at the Romanian Embassy. Thank you for your cooperation in this manner.
 

Examination of Witnesses (Questions 220 - 235) - Nicholson/Cantwell UK Parliament

Examination of Witnesses (Questions 220 - 235)

THURSDAY 3 MARCH 2005

Mr Nigel Cantwell, Ms Gill Haworth and Ms Naomi Angell

Q220 Chairman: Is there, or could there be, a set of criteria which would find general agreement? In a way you are both saying these are the sorts of things which would make us worry about the country. Is there a set of criteria? Could there be a set of criteria which would lead you to conclude that a particular country was not one in which adoption should be considered outside special cases?

Ms Angell: I think they would have to be reasonably general, because it is a huge range of concerns that have been raised. I would add to that I feel there should be a dialogue with countries where there is concern about their procedures. If there is a failure to respond in a reasonable way to those concerns over a period of time, that would cause concern. Different countries raise very different issues. As an illustration of that, for instance, in Guatemala the concern was on the provenance of relinquished children, that the people giving the children up for adoption may not be the mothers but were saying that they were, and what was put in place there was DNA testing by the British Embassy to provide those sorts of safeguards. In Cambodia children are not relinquished on the whole; it is mainly that they are abandoned, and it is very difficult then. DNA testing would not work, so one is having to look at very different solutions. I think any criteria would have to be broad and general.

Joint Committee on The Draft Children (Contact) and Adoption Bill Minutes of Evidence

Examination of Witnesses (Questions 220 - 235)

THURSDAY 3 MARCH 2005

Mr Nigel Cantwell, Ms Gill Haworth and Ms Naomi Angell

Q220 Chairman: Is there, or could there be, a set of criteria which would find general agreement? In a way you are both saying these are the sorts of things which would make us worry about the country. Is there a set of criteria? Could there be a set of criteria which would lead you to conclude that a particular country was not one in which adoption should be considered outside special cases?

Ms Angell: I think they would have to be reasonably general, because it is a huge range of concerns that have been raised. I would add to that I feel there should be a dialogue with countries where there is concern about their procedures. If there is a failure to respond in a reasonable way to those concerns over a period of time, that would cause concern. Different countries raise very different issues. As an illustration of that, for instance, in Guatemala the concern was on the provenance of relinquished children, that the people giving the children up for adoption may not be the mothers but were saying that they were, and what was put in place there was DNA testing by the British Embassy to provide those sorts of safeguards. In Cambodia children are not relinquished on the whole; it is mainly that they are abandoned, and it is very difficult then. DNA testing would not work, so one is having to look at very different solutions. I think any criteria would have to be broad and general.

Examination of Witnesses (Questions 220 - 235)

Mr Nigel Cantwell, Ms Gill Haworth and Ms Naomi Angell

Q220 Chairman: Is there, or could there be, a set of criteria which would find general agreement? In a way you are both saying these are the sorts of things which would make us worry about the country. Is there a set of criteria? Could there be a set of criteria which would lead you to conclude that a particular country was not one in which adoption should be considered outside special cases?

Ms Angell: I think they would have to be reasonably general, because it is a huge range of concerns that have been raised. I would add to that I feel there should be a dialogue with countries where there is concern about their procedures. If there is a failure to respond in a reasonable way to those concerns over a period of time, that would cause concern. Different countries raise very different issues. As an illustration of that, for instance, in Guatemala the concern was on the provenance of relinquished children, that the people giving the children up for adoption may not be the mothers but were saying that they were, and what was put in place there was DNA testing by the British Embassy to provide those sorts of safeguards. In Cambodia children are not relinquished on the whole; it is mainly that they are abandoned, and it is very difficult then. DNA testing would not work, so one is having to look at very different solutions. I think any criteria would have to be broad and general.

Q221 Ann Coffey: Just to explore that a little bit more, if there could be a general agreement about what you might identify as being systemic abuse over a period of time, how would that information come into countries like the UK? Would UNICEF have a role in that?

Mr Cantwell: My feeling is that there is now a wide potential range of credible sources, in respect of possible abuse of systems. Obviously there are organisations such as UNICEF, such as Save the Children, etcetera, who have done or sponsored reports in different countries, and I would say quite often courageous reports, or on problems relating to inter country adoption, but let me come back to my very first example. I actually quite strongly believe that the authorities of the countries concerned—obviously not in all cases, but in many, many cases—are themselves the source of expressed concerns that could be picked up by countries such as the UK or any other receiving country. That is certainly the case in Cambodia where on several occasions the Authorities there have stated very clearly, "We are not in a position to deal with this, we cannot cope ", and yet the situation rolled on. There are local NGOs too: for example, in the case of Cambodia, there is a league for human rights which has done tremendous work on this. Then you have the consultation process that exists within the framework of the Hague Convention, for example, the special commissions. We had one such meeting in 2000, a large part of which was devoted to the case of Guatemala, there is the Committee on the Rights of the Child, the special rapporteurs, within the UN system itself. There is a whole range of sources of information, I think.