Home  

JCICS Board Meeting

International Symposium Proposal:
Proposal #1: JCICS participation in the 2005 Conference on Children without Parental Care
Proposal #2: JCICS participation in the 2005 Conference on Children without Parental Care in the amount of $10,000.
Background: In 2004, International Advocates for Children (IAC) sponsored an international conference in Atlanta, Georgia. The event was fully funded in the amount of $60,000 by AMREX. Participants included 17 countries and NGO’s from Europe and the United States.
The second conference is planned for November 2005. Sponsors for this year’s event include: University of Mass, Focus on Adoption (FOA), IAC and Center for Adoption Research. Speakers will include Jakob Doek, Chairman of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, Sarah Dillon Phd., Elizabeth Bartholet Phd. among others including sending countries and sponsor representatives.
Rationale: Benefits to JCICS
Benefits to All
Considerations:
- Association with groups/individuals that do not have 100% agreement with JCICS positions as noted in the recently approved White Paper.
- Specific individuals and organizations upon whom JCICS is reliant, have expressed concern over JCICS involvement with certain co-sponsors.
Further Description:
T. DiFilipo
o
Demonstrates to decision makers JCICS’s leadership on child welfare issues.
o
Positions JCICS as a proactive advocacy group.
o
Provides opportunity to develop relationships with sending countries and others of influence with little human, man-hour or capital expenditures. [The cost of travel to all sending countries would run into the ten’s of thousands.]
o
Provides a world stage for JCICS advocacy on issues of concern.
o
Fulfills the JCICS goal of sponsoring an international symposium.
o
Provides a setting where peoples of divergent opinions, practices and process can openly share issues, concerns and solutions.
o
Provides the opportunity to create working relationships amongst the key layers in international child welfare.
o
Facilitates networking amongst child welfare professionals. [Prof. Elizabeth Bartholet, Harvard Law and Jakob Doek, UN Committee Chair held opposing positions until sitting on a panel at last year’s conference. Since then they have collaborated on two projects.]
o
Places children at the focus of key decision makers.
World Conference on Children without Parental Care
Understanding and Enforcing their Human Rights
Purpose: Facilitate an active, open and continuing exchange of ideas, concerns, issues, best practices, and solutions related to the best interest of children without parental care.
Method: 3-day conference in Boston, Massachusetts USA in November 2005 targeting participation of 200+ Government Representatives, Central Adoption Authorities, Social Service Providers, International NGO’s
Invite entities representing divergent cultures, practices and beliefs in an effort to dampen predetermined outcomes
Encourage ‘best evidence’ presentations from non-vested entities and academia
Planning:
1) Targeted Sponsors
a) Center for Adoption Policy
b) Center for Adoption Research (
c) Evan B. Donaldson Institute
d) Focus on Adoption (
e) Joint Council on International Children’s Services
f) International Advocates for Children (
g) National Council for Adoption
h) University of Massachusetts (
2) Targeted Speakers
a) UN Committee on the Rights of the Child – Jakob Doek
b) UNICEF
c) Hague Permanent Committee
d) Central Authorities
i. China
ii. Russia
e) CCAI
f) Academics
g) Sponsors
3) Workshop Topics
a) Structured Decision-making Principles to Serve the Best Interest of the Child
b) The Role of Agencies in Finding Permanent Placement Options for Children in Need
c) Reunification of Child to Biological Family
d) The Responsibility of Government to Children of Refugees and Street Children
e) Establishing a System of Checks and Balances in Child Policy
f) The Role of Receiving Countries in Intercountry Adoption
g) Psychological and Physical State of Institutionalized Children
4) Panel Discussions
Panel discussions and questions will be held between workshops with multiple experts from different fields in order to achieve a comprehensive perspective on issues. Attendees will be
invited to present on specific issues and questions relating to their individual governments and to share best practices.
Pros
Matches what JCICS wanted to do with own symposium
Furthers JCICS mission
Cost of $10,000
Puts us as co-sponsor with reputable organizations
Opportunity to speak, help set the agenda
Networking possibilities
Inroads with UNICEF
Possibly 19 countries represented
Cons
Cost of $10,000
Negative perception of some co-sponsors
Not a direct benefit to our members
Concerns: Negative reaction of JCICS members
Questions: Should JCICS still hold its own symposium, and if so, should JCICS network with other organizations?
Options
Do nothing
Raise $ on our own
Make our own alliance with other organizations
Join this one
Agreed to Sponsor) Agreed to Sponsor) Agreed to Sponsor) Agreed to Sponsor)
MOTION: For JCICS to co-sponsor the IAC Symposium.
K. Wallace MOVED/ L. Wetterberg SECONDED TIED 4-4, 2 abstentions
Further discussion was held regarding whether or not JCICS should co-sponsor the IAC symposium. Those in favor of the idea felt that it would give JCICS the opportunity to lead and to network with UNICEF and foreign officials in a cost effective way. Those concerned about participating felt that JCICS’ relationship with U.S. government officials and JCICS members might be compromised due to existing perceptions regarding some of the existing sponsors. It was generally agreed upon that there might be a more level playing field if other organizations with similar values and beliefs would also agree to be sponsors. Tom will do further investigation and report back to the board.

Forum: "Adecop, ufff"

Google Translation:

Adecop, Phew"

Submitted by clooney18 on June 15 at 16:45

My experience with adecop say that was rare, not in the sense of the adoption, if not in what I could see in terms of what surrounds it. If you go to their offices alicante look weird stuff, there is a private agency, which apparently is the president of ADECOP, because I saw him over there, and within it, sharing space ADECOP this, I would imagine that all that is not ADECOP subsidized, because when it presents the accounts of adecop see a point in their budgets for rent. I only had to go once there, talk to the director of ADECOP, who is the wife of the president, and in order, are rare that you see things and do not know or do not want to explain to imagine weird stuff, as I imagine it must have a salary women and I imagine that the accounts of the ADECOP should make anyone who imagine that it must be one's own consultants, who charged for this service, so that everything stays at home. I only say this, he gave me the impression that this was more than an ECAI looks like a well-structured business, I can not imagine anything, just talking to me the impression that da.Pero that's not my job, that should resolve the administration, that is what is responsible for all subsidize the cost for the maintenance of these partnerships. my nana certainly the most beautiful.

=======================================================

Do adoptees have special CPR numbers?

Foreign adoptees always have a social security number with a relatively high serial number, but you cannot determine from the serial number whether the child is adopted. However, special conditions apply to foreign adoptees who came to Denmark between 1976 and 1984.

For adoptees who arrived in Denmark in 2001 or later, many have been surprised that the child has been given a very high serial number, but there is a natural explanation for this.

A CPR number consists of 10 digits: ddmmåå xyzw

ddmmyy is the date of birth, 6 digits.

xyz is a 3-digit serial number, 3 digits

Marie Ange: The globe trotting filmmaker

Culture


Marie Ange: The globe trotting filmmaker


Haitian filmmaker Marie Ange Sylvain-Holmgren's home in Gulshan is a virtual treasure trove of artifacts. As soon as one enters, one is greeted by her photograph of Buddhist monks in Laos. There's more--ornaments such as bead necklaces of the Masai women from Kenya, a Pali book from Myanmar, betel boxes from Myanmar and old Ethiopian jewellery fashioned from bronze. Adorning the walls are paintings of Ranjit Das and Srabon. In one corner is a piano which she has been playing for 30 years.

All this and more is testimony to Marie Ange's globetrotting existence which has taken her through countries such as USA, UK, France, Mexico, Ecuador, Zaire, Algeria, Senegal, Kenya, Nepal, Vietnam, Thailand, Myanmar and Laos.

Since 2002 she has been in Bangladesh, working as a film director with the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and basically produces documentaries on social issues, especially those related to UNDP's projects. Among her latest works is a film on the Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT), titled Amar Desh. This work narrates the story of the tribal communities and their non-tribal neighbours in the CHT. As Marie Ange says, "The most important objective of the UNDP project is to build the self-confidence of the ethnic communities and develop these areas."

Marie Ange is also doing an independent documentary on Indian classical vocalist Kalpana Bhattacharya. The latter is based in Kolkata and is currently in Dhaka. Marie Ange is effusive in her praise for Kalpana. As she says, " She sings raga in the dhrupad style. Raga is not merely an auditory experience but also an emotional one for her."

In all likelihood, Marie Ange will call the film Kalpana. The shooting is over and she is now beginning the editing process, which will take a month. The film is in Bangla with English subtitles.

Marie Ange is also learning to play the sitar. Her guru is Ustad Alim Khan. She took to this musical instrument in November last year. In her words, "I opted for the sitar because it is through this music that I developed an interest in Indian classical music. This music speaks to me and I become so overwhelmed with emotion that I cry sometimes."

What about the language barrier? The articulate Marie Ange is unfazed: "There is nothing to understand. The words are not important, it is the rhythm and tunes that count. There are notes and musical forms which I have never heard before and which touch my heart," she says.

For Marie Ange, Bangladesh is an eye-opener. "I have never been in a country where everything is a subject. You go out in the streets and there are subjects, everywhere you turn. Even the garbage lady is a subject for films and photography. I would call Bangladesh a university of life; I have never seen a country where you have so many issues all together, like environment, the refugee situation, poverty, ethnic conflict, education and gender issues.

I know many foreigners complain about everyday life in Bangladesh but I find it amazingly interesting and I learn so much."

What's in store for the intrepid Marie Ange? Continuing to find subjects and devote time to the sitar. In the meantime Bangladesh and Marie Ange have a symbiotic relationship.

Annual report 2005 + 2006 - Gamini Wijewardena

3.5 Sri Lanka

Binnen het bestuur was reeds eind 2004 de discussie

opgestart of we wel verder willen gaan met de toenmalige

contactpersoon. Dit omdat wij van mening waren dat het

aantal adopties achterbleef bij onze verwachtingen. Tijdens

The Two Faces of Intercountry Adoption: The Significance of the Indian Adoption Scandals

1. The CRC and Intercountry Adoption The CRC appears to take a very limited view of when intercountry adoption is appropriate. The critical text requires that state parties “[r]ecognize that inter-country adoption may be considered as an alternative means of child’s care, if the child cannot be placed in a foster or an adoptive family or cannot in any suitable manner be cared for in the child’s country of origin.”

The CRC’s preference for in-country over intercountry adoption is compatible with the Hague Convention. However, the CRC also specifically prefers in-country foster care over intercountry adoption, and initially appears to favor in-country institutional care over intercountry adoption. These latter positions are more controversial, and appear to conflict with the Hague Convention.

It is notable, in this regard, that the United Nations Children’s Fund (“UNICEF”) recently issued a public position on intercountry adoption which appears to favor intercountry adoption over incountry institutional care.24 The statement cites both the CRC and the Hague Convention with approval. In regard to institutional care, however, UNICEF states: For children who cannot be raised by their own families, an appropriate alternative family environment should be sought in preference to institutional care, which should be used only as a last resort and as a temporary measure. Inter-country adoption is one of a range of care options which may be open to children, and for individual children who cannot be placed in a permanent family setting in their countries of origin, it may indeed be the best solution. In each case, the best interests of the individual child must be the guiding principle in making a decision regarding adoption. 

One could argue that, under the language of the CRC, institutional care is not a “suitable manner” for the permanent care of a child. Therefore, a plausible interpretation of the CRC is that it prefers intercountry adoption to in-country institutional care. By such interpretations, the international community is apparently working toward a harmonization of apparent conflicts between the CRC and the Hague Convention.

Hands of Mercy Christian Outreach to build Orphanage

Hands of Mercy Christian Outreach to build Orphanage

Source: GNA - Ghana News AgencyRegional News | Sat, 28 May 2005 ArticleHeadlines(0) Comment | Share | Print | E-mail | Save | Alerts If God's compassion or grace doesn't have an end,then,there is no hell. By: Kyei-Afrifa Mannhei

Accra, May 28, GNA - An Orphanage estimated at about 90 million dollars is to be constructed near Madina in Accra by the Hands of Mercy Christian Outreach Ministry.

Mr Paul Anaba, Africa Liaison Chairman of the Board of the Ghana Division of Outreach, disclosed this to the Ghana News Agency in Accra, on Saturday.

He said land had been acquired for the project, adding that, the Director of the Outreach, which is an international Ministry based in Canada, the Reverend Deborah Macquarrie, was expected in Ghana by the end of the year to perform the ground breaking ceremony. Mr Anaba who is also Home Administrator said that in a modest way, the Outreach had started a Home at Teshie Tsui-bleoo with nine orphans in rented premises.

The unearthing of an international child trafficking racket that brazenly thrived under the guise of adoption

Article contains pic of Satish, Sabeen etc. http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/international-child-trafficking-racket-busted-in-tamil-nadu/1/193692.html

 

Babies With Price Tags The unearthing of an international child trafficking racket that brazenly thrived under the guise of an adoption agency shows how pockets of poverty in the state are a haven for baby hunters

May 23, 2005 | Arun Ram

Koteeswaran means "millionaire" in Tamil and when autorickshaw driver Gokulakrishnan and his wife Geetha of Chennai named their son so, they may have hoped to alleviate the misery of their poverty- ridden lives. But the misery was compounded when on January 5, 2000, the two-year-old boy went missing from their Thousand Lights home. Last week, however, he was found again a few kilometres away in T. Nagar, staying with his adopted parents after the Chennai Police unearthed a racket run by an adoption agency that sold kidnapped children like Koteeswaran.

The shocking tale of a flourishing trade in child trafficking unfolded on May 3 when the police arrested a bootlegger, Sheikh Mohammed. On interrogation he revealed that he and his brother-in- law were also involved in "arranging" for children to be sent abroad. Several more arrests led the police to Manoharan who was the conduit between the kidnappers and Malaysia Social Service Centre (MSSC), the adoption agency.

The Central Crime Branch (CCB) then took over the investigation. With the arrest of P. Ravindranath, who ran MSSC, his wife Vatsala and son Dinesh Kumar, it came to light that between 1991 and 2002 the agency had sent at least 125 children to various countries, including Australia, Finland and the Netherlands. Flouting the extremely stringent adoptionrules in India and abroad, the agency had indulged in forgery, falsification of documents and, above all, abetting of kidnapping. "Certificates of the Juvenile Welfare Board, Social Defence Department and Social Welfare Department appear to be forged. The racketeers obviously had connections in high places," says a police officer. "It operated at various levels and included gangs for kidnapping, forgery and mobilisation of funds from abroad." A school, a children's home and a creche, which Ravindranath claims to have been running, may have been sources for foreign funds.

While the financial details are being probed, what is appalling is that MSSC was given a clean chit in 2000 by none other than the Tamil Nadu Police. The Indian Council for Child Welfare (ICCW), one of the scrutinising agencies for adoption-related applications, had submitted a report on serious lapses in the functioning of the MSSC to the Madras High Court, which then suggested a police probe. But the police had failed to find anything then. Also MSSC did not renew its licence in 2002 after 11 years of functioning.

Now as the CCB tries to trace the 325 children who went missing in recent years, CCB Assistant Commissioner and investigating officer Augustine Daniel says the actual number ofchildren sold by Ravindranath could be much higher. From the albums at MSSC, sevenchildren who went missing since 1991 were found to be adopted by families in different countries. It appears that MSSC's prime source of children were the kidnapping gangs. Two of the accused-Sabeera and Noujut-were allegedly the main kidnappers. Each child fetched them Rs 10,000, of which Manoharan pocketed Rs 1,000. While Ravindranath says he got $1,000 (Rs 43,000) for every child sent abroad, the police suspect the amount to be as high as $50,000 per child.

"The most vulnerable were children who slept on pavements," says Daniel. "When the parents slept, the kidnappers would pick up children aged under two-and-a-half years." In fact Gokulakrishnan and Geetha were alerted when they saw the photo of Sabeera in the newspapers and recalled her as a frequent visitor to the locality. The couple now face legal hassles before they can claim their son.

The case is also set to take an interesting turn. One of the parents, M. Dekla, a fisherwoman from Kotapalli village in Tirunelveli, has complained that MSSC had taken two of her childrenin 1998 to Germany "to provide education", but refused to give any details of them for the past five years. The children, Miguel and Melissa, now 15 and 14 years old, have reportedly been adopted by a German couple. Police sources say that besides kidnapping, the gang may have "bought" children from poor families. Parents like Dekla were offered Rs 1,000 a month for a few months.

While this is the first such international racket to be unearthed in Tamil Nadu, child traffickingacross state borders is rampant. Police and NGOs confide that a number of scams works overtime in the poverty-stricken pockets of Villupuram, Theni, Kambam, Madurai, Thenkasi and Chennai. Hundreds of children are taken by agents to Kerala to be employed as domestic helps. Their parents are offered a few thousand rupees in the first few months after which payment is stopped. Worse is the plight of children in the 10-14 age group who are taken to Maharashtra and Gujarat to be employed under excruciating conditions in sweet-making units.

NGOs blame the police for not taking the cases of missing children seriously. Says C. Nambi, convener of the NGO Campaign Against Child Trafficking: "After putting up an advertisement about the missing child, the police don't follow up the case. In this case one child went missing from the Thousand Lights police station limits and was given away for adoption in T. Nagar, which is under the jurisdiction of a nearby police station."

As details of the case are highlighted in the media, many parents have come flocking to the city police commissioner's office with photographs of their missing children, hoping to be reunited with them. Given the brazen way in which MSSC conducted its vicious trade and got away with it, one can only hope the investigation will this time nail the bigger fish who enabled it to thrive for over a decade.

COPYRIGHT 2008 Syndica

Comment Anke Hassel on TAZ article

ANKE HASSEL

Gast

22.05.2010, 13:56

Liebe taz,

eine kritische Berichterstattung über problematische Praktiken in der internationalen Adoptionsvermittlung ist wichtig, um diese zu unterbinden. Eine Adoption aufgrund falscher Angaben noch lebender Eltern hat tragische Folgen nicht nur für das Kind sondern auch für die aufnehmende Familie. Wenn dem Vater das Kind wirklich, wie im Artikel angedeutet, von einem Mittelsmann abgeschwatzt wurde, dann ist dies ein Skandal und widerspricht allen Grundsätzen der Adoptionsvermittlung.

JCICS did not agree with Poupard/Unicef Romania's letter of 2/4/2004

JCICS was part of a meeting yesterday with three congressional offices, two from Kentucky and one from Illinois. Through a meeting with Chris Smith, they were referred to the Helsinki Commission, one of the largest Human Rights watch groups in the world, and a meeting has been set with them for 3pm today. Also discussed was the February 2004 letter from Pierre Poupard of UNICEF to the Romanian Prime Minister Adrian Nastase as it directly contradicts the UNICEF statement from January 2004 that indicated international adoption is one viable form of child welfare. (See attachment to minutes.)

)