Home  

China's Missing Children

China's Missing Children

As many as 70,000 Chinese kids may get kidnapped each year. Parents, who often have nowhere to turn to for help, are taking matters into their own hands.

BY CHARLES CUSTER | OCTOBER 10, 2011

BEIJING—On April 10, 2010, the Liu family was living the Chinese dream. The couple had moved to the city, rented an apartment, and were blessed with two beautiful children. They weren't rich, but they were getting by. Like many Chinese people, they felt their lives were getting better.

The next morning, strange men came to their house, grabbed their son Liu Jingjun, dragged him into a white van, and drove off. Since then, the Lius have been looking for him. They haven't found him, but they have discovered that there are an awful lot of people just like themselves.

Since at least the 1980s, kidnapping and human trafficking have become a problem in China, and most often, the victims are children. Estimates vary on just how bad things have gotten. The Chinese government reports that fewer than 10,000 children are kidnapped each year, but the U.S. State Department says it's closer to 20,000. Some independent estimates put the number as high as 70,000 (compared with 100 to 200 children kidnapped per year in the United States, for example).

The vast majority of kidnapped children will never see their families again. In China, kids are abducted not for ransom but for sale. Often, they come from poor and rural families -- the families least likely to be capable of tracking their kids down or fighting back. Some children are then sold to new "adoptive" families looking for children. Others are sold into slave labor, prostitution, or a life on the streets. In some cases, healthy children are brutally crippled by handlers on the theory that a child with broken legs or horrific boils looks sadder and can earn more money begging on the street.

Some children are even sold into adoption overseas. Chinese adoption agencies seeking the substantial donations foreign parents make when they adopt -- in some cases, as much as $5,000 -- have been known to purchase children from human traffickers, though these cases appear to be relatively rare.

Most instances of kidnapping are perpetrated by gangs that are large, national, and highly organized. Based on cases solved by Chinese police, it's not uncommon for some kidnapping rings to have dozens or even hundreds of members, and to be responsible for the kidnappings of hundreds of children.

The estimates vary so widely because official numbers are hard to come by and harder to trust. Pi Yijun, a professor at the Institute for Criminal Justice and an expert on crimes involving children, says, "Data about the dark side of society is extremely difficult to obtain, and even when it is made public, the Public Security Bureau [i.e., the police] only reports based on the number of cases they've uncovered." That means that China's official statistics on kidnapping are based only on cases that are proved to be crimes. Because most parents have no proof that their child was kidnapped (rather than running away on his or her own), many cases are filed as missing-person reports and thus go uncounted in official statistics.

On the morning of April 11, 2010, Mrs. Liu was in the apartment, but she and her husband's son -- just 2 at the time -- had wandered out the door and was playing with some other kids from the neighborhood. When she looked out the door and saw he was missing, she called her husband, and when the two of them still couldn't find the boy, they called the cops.

The police came. "They said nothing," said Mr. Liu. "They said, 'It's not urgent; just relax. Maybe he ran away by himself or he's at a neighbor's house. Just look around yourselves.'"

Other parents of kidnapped children say this is common; unless there's concrete, immediate proof of a kidnapping, police won't even accept a missing-person report until the subject has been missing for at least 24 hours.

Mrs. Zhu, the mother of kidnapped 12-year-old Lei Xiaoxia, who went missing on May 24 in Shanxi province, reported her daughter's case to anyone who would listen -- three different police authorities, her daughter's school, and even their city's education bureau -- but always got the same answer. "They said, 'All we can do is investigate for you; there's nothing we can really do [otherwise]."

These investigations leave much to be desired. Mrs. Zhu told me, "After we reported [the disappearance], they went out and patrolled for a bit, but after that we never saw them looking again." They also never went to the train station or the bus station to check the surveillance tapes, she said. Later, a reporter discovered that Zhu's daughter had been seen at school that day, but the police had also forgotten to check the school's security tapes, which had since been automatically deleted by the surveillance system. Lei Xiaoxia is still missing.

Even when police do investigate seriously, happy endings are rare. Trafficking gangs are highly organized. Children are moved over great distances and shuffled between handlers after they're kidnapped to ensure they are impossible to trace.

Li Yong, an adult who was kidnapped around 1988 and sold to another family when he was about 5 (he's not sure of his real age or birthday), remembers he was moved around quite a bit. "After I was kidnapped, I was taken into cars, a long-distance bus, and a train," he says. Years after his kidnapping, police finally tracked down one man involved with Li's kidnapping, but the trail ended there. The seller, the kidnapper, and the handlers who watched Li during various stages of his journey have yet to be found.

Investigating kidnapping cases effectively requires sustained effort, ongoing cooperation between numerous local precincts, and high-tech methods of tracking and identifying both kidnappers and children. When a particular gang gets onto the police's radar, higher authorities may help organize this sort of sustained effort, and when caught, human traffickers face stiff sentences and even the death penalty. But many kidnapping cases never make it past the local precinct, where they're filed as missing-person cases and, generally, forgotten.

Some parents accept their fates and wait quietly for a phone call from the police that will probably never come. But more and more parents are taking to the Internet and to the streets to search for their children.

"We look every day," Mr. Liu, a contract laborer, said. "Before my son was taken, I didn't know how to use the Internet, but now I go to an Internet cafe every day. I can't afford my own computer, so I go there to look for my son, making posts about him and searching through the Net."

An entire ecosystem of Internet services has sprung up for Chinese parents like Liu. Sites like "Baby Come Home" collect information, photos, and other data from tens of thousands of parents and help them publicize it all. They also collect photos and reports of street children for parents of kidnapped kids to browse, looking for their children.

Many parents also take to the street. Mr. Liu connected online with other parents of kidnapped children in his area, and now they organize events together. One of the parents, whose son was also kidnapped, has decorated his truck with photos of his son and dozens of other missing children. The parents pick a busy street corner, park the truck there, surround it with large posters about their children, and hand out fliers and cards to passers-by.

When he can, Liu brings his young daughter along to these events, where she helps her parents pass out flyers. She's too young to understand what happened to her little brother, but she hasn't forgotten him. She dreams about him, her father says. "When we hear her talk about him, it's devastating."

Some have placed the blame for China's child-trafficking problem squarely at the feet of the one-child policy, but that's an oversimplification according to Pi Yijun, of the Institute for Criminal Justice. Part of the problem is that compared with other things one might steal, such as cars or computers, children are easy to get ahold of and difficult to track, he says. "Additionally, if [the kidnapper] has got a buyer already, they can reap the rewards quickly, and I think that's an important reason" that kidnapping is so common in China.

Of course, without buyers there would be no sellers, and there are still buyers aplenty in China. True, the one-child policy has made children scarcer, but because families with more than one child -- regardless of whether the children are adopted or birthed -- must pay fines, there's no real reason for healthy parents to choose to purchase a kidnapped child rather than just having another one of their own. Often, the buyers of kidnapped kids are married couples who can't conceive or who have given birth to only daughters and want to be sure their next child is a son. Some families also buy older girls as brides for their sons if the son can't attract a wife through traditional means (often because of some mental or physical disability).

China's culture of silence also plays a role. "My son will never know he was kidnapped and purchased," Mr. Liu says. "In our hometown, when people buy wives, no one says anything. No one talks. Our child was too young to understand what happened to him; when he grows up he won't understand that it's all fake."

This is not an uncommon phenomenon. After Li Yong was kidnapped and sold to his new family in Jiangsu, he walked around telling neighbors his original name and asking to go home, speaking in a dialect foreign to that province. But no one reported anything to the authorities until more than a decade later, and by then, it was way too late. Many Chinese believe that getting involved in someone else's business is asking for trouble, and in some rural areas where education levels remain low, purchasing children is still considered an acceptable alternative for couples who are infertile or too old to conceive safely.

For his part, Mr. Liu doesn't blame the men who kidnapped his son. "We parents, the parents of lost children, hate these people, and society hates them too, but sometimes you can't blame human traffickers. Sometimes you have to blame our society. What I mean is, [in China] we still don't have a strong rule of law. If it were stronger, could this kind of thing happen?"

Mr. Liu and his wife are still searching for their son. Mrs. Zhu and her husband are still searching for their daughter. They work when they need to, but their lives are on hold until they get some news, just like the tens of thousands of other parents nationwide who are searching. "It's like we're living with dead hearts," Mrs. Zhu told me between sobs. "If we can't find our child, life is meaningless."

Authority to travel for talks on adoption agreements

The Irish Times - Monday, October 10, 2011

Authority to travel for talks on adoption agreements

CAROL COULTER

DELEGATIONS FROM the Adoption Authority of Ireland will travel to Mexico, the Philippines and the United States to discuss adoption agreements, the International Adoption Association was told at the weekend.

Geoffrey Shannon, chairman of the authority, told its annual conference it was in advanced discussions with a number of countries party to the Hague Convention on Inter-country Adoption after the incorporation of the convention into Irish law last year.

Adoption agency funded despite Vietnam suspension

Adoption agency funded despite Vietnam suspension

CAROL COULTER, Legal Affairs Editor

Mon, Oct 10, 2011

THE HEALTH Service Executive paid more than €200,000 in 2010 to an adoption agency in Cork which deals with adoptions from Vietnam, despite the fact adoptions from that country were suspended in May 2009.

The money was paid through the HSE in Cork to the Cork-based Helping Hands adoption agency, set up in 2005 to assist couples adopting from Vietnam.

Daughter of ‘Dirty War,’ Raised by Man Who Killed Her Parents

Daughter of ‘Dirty War,’ Raised by Man Who Killed Her Parents

BUENOS AIRES — Victoria Montenegro recalls a childhood filled with chilling dinnertime discussions. Lt. Col. Hernán Tetzlaff, the head of the family, would recount military operations he had taken part in where “subversives” had been tortured or killed. The discussions often ended with his “slamming his gun on the table,” she said.

Joao Pina for The New York Times

Victoria Montenegro was abducted as a newborn by a military colonel. She testified last spring in the trial over baby thefts.

Related

Metro Twitter Logo.

Connect With Us on Twitter

Follow@nytimesworldfor international breaking news and headlines.

Associated Press

The Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo, who lost children during Argentina's military dictatorship, protesting in Buenos Aires in 1977.

It took an incessant search by a human rights group, a DNA match and almost a decade of overcoming denial for Ms. Montenegro, 35, to realize that Colonel Tetzlaff was, in fact, not her father — nor the hero he portrayed himself to be.

Instead, he was the man responsible for murdering her real parents and illegally taking her as his own child, she said.

He confessed to her what he had done in 2000, Ms. Montenegro said. But it was not until she testified at a trial here last spring that she finally came to grips with her past, shedding once and for all the name that Colonel Tetzlaff and his wife had given her — María Sol — after falsifying her birth records.

The trial, in the final phase of hearing testimony, could prove for the first time that the nation’s top military leaders engaged in a systematic plan to steal babies from perceived enemies of the government.

Jorge Rafael Videla, who led the military duringArgentina’s dictatorship, stands accused of leading the effort to take babies from mothers in clandestine detention centers and give them to military or security officials, or even to third parties, on the condition that the new parents hide the true identities. Mr. Videla is one of 11 officials on trial for 35 acts of illegal appropriation of minors.

The trial is also revealing the complicity of civilians, including judges and officials of the Roman Catholic Church.

The abduction of an estimated 500 babies was one of the most traumatic chapters of the military dictatorship that ruled Argentina from 1976 to 1983. The frantic effort by mothers and grandmothers to locate their missing children has never let up. It was the one issue that civilian presidents elected after 1983 did not excuse the military for, even as amnesty was granted for other “dirty war” crimes.

“Even the many Argentines who considered the amnesty a necessary evil were unwilling to forgive the military for this,” said José Miguel Vivanco, the Americas director forHuman Rights Watch.

In Latin America, the baby thefts were largely unique to Argentina’s dictatorship, Mr. Vivanco said. There was no such effort in neighboring Chile’s 17-year dictatorship.

One notable difference was the role of the Catholic Church. In Argentina the church largely supported the military government, while in Chile it confronted the government of Gen. Augusto Pinochet and sought to expose its human rights crimes, Mr. Vivanco said.

Priests and bishops in Argentina justified their support of the government on national security concerns, and defended the taking of children as a way to ensure they were not “contaminated” by leftist enemies of the military, said Adolfo Pérez Esquivel, a Nobel Prize-winning human rights advocate who has investigated dozens of disappearances and testified at the trial last month.

Ms. Montenegro contended: “They thought they were doing something Christian to baptize us and give us the chance to be better people than our parents. They thought and felt they were saving our lives.”

Church officials in Argentina and at the Vatican declined to answer questions about their knowledge of or involvement in the covert adoptions.

For many years, the search for the missing children was largely futile. But that has changed in the past decade thanks to more government support, advanced forensic technology and a growing genetic data bank from years of testing. The latest adoptee to recover her real identity, Laura Reinhold Siver, brought the total number of recoveries to 105 in August.

Still, the process of accepting the truth can be long and tortuous. For years, Ms. Montenegro rejected efforts by officials and advocates to discover her true identity. From a young age, she received a “strong ideological education” from Colonel Tetzlaff, an army officer at a secret detention center.

If she picked up a flier from leftists on the street, “he would sit me down for hours to tell me what the subversives had done to Argentina,” she said.

He took her along to a detention center where he spent hours discussing military operations with his fellow officers, “how they had killed people, tortured them,” she said.

“I grew up thinking that in Argentina there had been a war, and that our soldiers had gone to war to guarantee the democracy,” she said. “And that there were no disappeared people, that it was all a lie.”

She said he did not allow her to see movies about the “dirty war,” including “The Official Story,” the 1985 film about an upper-middle-class couple raising a girl taken from a family that was disappeared.

In 1992, when she was 15, Colonel Tetzlaff was detained briefly on suspicion of baby stealing. Five years later, a court informed Ms. Montenegro that she was not the biological child of Colonel Tetzlaff and his wife, she said.

“I was still convinced it was all a lie,” she said.

By 2000, Ms. Montenegro still believed her mission was to keep Colonel Tetzlaff out of prison. But she relented and gave a DNA sample. A judge then delivered jarring news: the test confirmed that she was the biological child of Hilda and Roque Montenegro, who had been active in the resistance. She learned that she and the Montenegros had been kidnapped when she was 13 days old.

At a restaurant over dinner, Colonel Tetzlaff confessed to Ms. Montenegro and her husband: He had headed the operation in which the Montenegros were tortured and killed, and had taken her in May 1976, when she was 4 months old.

“I can’t bear to say any more,” she said, choking up at the memory of the dinner.

A court convicted Colonel Tetzlaff in 2001 of illegally appropriating Ms. Montenegro. He went to prison, and Ms. Montenegro, still believing his actions during the dictatorship had been justified, visited him weekly until his death in 2003.

Slowly, she got to know her biological parents’ family.

“This was a process; it wasn’t one moment or one day when you erase everything and begin again,” she said. “You are not a machine that can be reset and restarted.”

It fell to her to tell her three sons that Colonel Tetzlaff was not the man they thought he was.

“He told them that their grandfather was a brave soldier, and I had to tell them that their grandfather was a murderer,” she said.

When she testified at the trial, she used her original name, Victoria, for the first time. “It was very liberating,” she said.

She says she still does not hate the Tetzlaffs. But “the heart doesn’t kidnap you, it doesn’t hide you, it doesn’t hurt you, it doesn’t lie to you all of your life,” she said. “Love is something else.”

Charles Newbery contributed reporting.

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: October 8, 2011

An earlier version of this article incorrectly stated that "The Official Story" was a film about a boy who was taken from his family. The movie was about a girl.

 

India: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE TO DISCUSS CHILD ADOPTION ISSUES

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE TO DISCUSS CHILD ADOPTION ISSUES ________________________________________ 18:6 IST India is hosting three days International Conference from 8th to 10th October, 2007 to discuss child adoption issues in New Delhi. Briefing the media about the agenda of the conference, Smt. Renuka Chowdhury, Minister for Women and Child Development said that the conference would provide a plateform to get feed back from the receiving countries about the adoption of Indian children. It would also apprise them of our concern regarding inter country adoption. She said that the Government wants to make the adoption procedure more transparent, hassle free with all safeguards. With this objective, it would soon come out with new guidelines on adoption. Speedy Redressal of grievances and centralize monitoring of the adoption procedure will be focus of the new guidelines, she added. Underlining the importance of family based care for the children in need of care and protection, she said that adoption is not one time event but a life long celebration which not only provide a family to a children but also a new meaning in the life of a family. The international conference being organized by Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA), an autonomous body under the Ministry of Women and Child Development will discuss the draft UN guidelines on children without parental care and safeguards for children placed for inter country adoption. The issue of trans-cultural adoption and identity issues for children for international adoptions will also be taken up during the conference. Preparing the special needs children for inter-country adoption and their rehabilitation is one of the important subjects besides review of guidelines for inter-country adoption. The conference will be attended by more than 300 delegates including 150 delegates from across the world including Govt. representatives, national adoption agencies, social scientists and child-care experts. NCJ/DT

T

UN bashes Swedish children's rights

UN bashes Swedish children's rights

Published: 8 Oct 11 11:11 CET | Double click on a word to get a translation
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/36622/20111008/

For the fifth time, Sweden has been criticised by the UN's Committee on the Rights of the Child for not having introduced their children's rights convention as Swedish law.

Sweden signed the convention in 1990, and an added protocol on child trafficking in 2006.

For the first time, the UN committee in Geneva has now investigated how well the Swedish government has followed the protocol on protecting children against trafficking, prostitution and child pornography.

The government was criticised on more points than Christina Heilborn, children's rights lawyer at Unicef's Swedish division, was expecting, including criticism on how refugee and asylum-seeking children are treated in Sweden.

"The committee feel these groups aren't protected sufficiently here," said Heilborn to news agency TT.

The committee has investigated Sweden and the children's rights convention on four previous occasions.

"A general criticism, which has been voiced several times before, is about making the convention Swedish law. This is a recurring criticism against Sweden, and the government has chosen to completely ignore it."

A country such as Sweden is expected to take a convention about children's human rights very seriously, stated the committee earlier this week.

The government, represented in Geneva by department officials, stated that Swedish laws generally provide children with better protection than the convention does.

When asked by TT how the convention would improve upon Swedish law, Christina Heilborn responded:

"One major difference would be a clear protection against discrimination, that all children in Sweden would have the same rights by law, whether they lack documents, are in hiding, asylum-seekers or Swedish citizens. Today children are divided into groups which have different rights. This is something which is not allowed according to the children's rights convention."

The UN's Committee on the Rights of the Child also wants Sweden to introduce a harsher definition of what constitutes child pornography.

More Referrals..... IAC 180 + 181

Monday, May 30, 2011




More Referrals.....




Session
180 and 181, thanks to Viviane....
For more detailes refer to MOJ
website

The following referrals were issued in IAC Session 181 which was
held on 04/26/11:

1) French dossier from 2008 referred a waiting child
(#1276) with a profile on the MOJ site

2) French dossier from 2009
referred a child aged 7 years and 5 months, male

3) Italian dossier from
2009 referred a child aged 8 years and 7 months, female

4) Italian
dossier from 2010 referred a child aged 7 years and 8 months, male

5)
French dossier from 2010 referred two children, male and female, aged 7 years
and 11 months and 7 years

6) U.S. dossier from 2010 referred three
children, male and female, aged 6 years and 5 months, 8 years and 7 months, and
7 years

7) Italian dossier from 2011 referred two waiting children (#1399
& #1400) with profiles on the MOJ site

8) Swedish dossier from 2011
referred a waiting child (#1241) with a profile on the MOJ site

IAC 180
Results

The following referrals were issued in IAC Session 180 which was
held on 04/15/11:

1) German dossier from 2008 referred a child aged 2
years and 9 months, female

2) Greek dossier from 2008 referred a child
aged 4 years and 2 months, male

3) Italian dossier from 2008 referred a
child aged 4 years and 6 months, female

4) U.S. dossier from 2008
referred a child aged 4 years and 9 months, female, with features in health
status

5) Italian dossier from 2009 referred a child aged 4 years and 10
months, female, with features in health status

6) Italian dossier from
2009 referred a child aged 5 years and 9 months, male

7) Dutch dossier
from 2009 referred a child aged 5 years, male

8) Italian dossier from
2009 referred a two female children, aged 6 years and 3 months and 3 years and 9
months

9) Italian dossier from 2010 referred a child aged 8 years and 3
months, male

10) Italian dossier from 2010 referred a child aged 9 years
and 1 month, female

11) Italian dossier from 2010 referred two children,
female and male, aged 7 years and 5 months and 9 years

12) Italian
dossier from 2011 referred a waiting child (# 18) with a profile on the MOJ site

IAC 193 Results

Friday, October 7, 2011



IAC 193 Results



The following referrals were issued in IAC Session 193 which was held on 09/09/11:


1) Greek dossier from March 2006 referred a female child aged 2 years and 5 months

2) Italian dossier from August 2009 referred a waiting child (#1581) with a profile on the MOJ site

3) Italian dossier from September 2009 referred a female child aged 7 years and 6 months

4) U.S. dossier from March 2010 referred a male child aged 2 years 7 months with
data onfamily history and with peculiarities in the health status

5) Italian dossier from November 2010 referred a waiting child (#1519) with a profile on the MOJ site

6) Italian dossier from January 2011 referred awaiting child (#1579) with a profile on the MOJ site

7) U.S. dossier from March 2011 referred a waiting child (#1431) with a profile on the MOJ site

8) U.S. dossier from August 2011 referred waiting children (#900 & #902) with profiles on the MOJ site

9) Italian dossier from August 2011 referred a waiting child (#1498) with a profile on the MOJ site

10) U.S. dossier from September 2011 referred waiting children (#28 & #14) with profiles on the MOJ site

11) Canadian dossier from September 2011 referred a waiting child (#1188) with a profile on the MOJ site

12) U.S. dossier from September 2011 referred a waiting child (#1478) with a profile on the MOJ site



Posted by Viviane at 4:08 AM

Indiase ouders eisen adoptiekind terug (Van der Maten - incl video)

Indiase ouders eisen adoptiekind terug

De ouders van een jongetje uit India dat door Nederlanders is geadopteerd, stappen naar de rechter. Ze zeggen dat het kind is gestolen en willen dat de politie hem terughaalt naar India.

De politie in India wil dat Interpol zorgt voor een dna-onderzoek in Nederland. Volgens de adoptiewet zijn de adoptieouders verplicht op die eis in te gaan.

De ouders vertelden NOS-correspondent Wilma van der Maten dat hun zoontje Satish acht jaar geleden is gestolen uit hun huis in Chennai, een stad in het zuidoosten van India. 

Het kind was toen anderhalf jaar oud. "Het was een warme nacht, ik werd wakker om 4 uur en toen was Satish verdwenen", herinnert de moeder zich. Haar man vertelt hoe hij overal had gezocht, maar dat het kind spoorloos was.

Maffia

Pas in 2005 kregen de ouders bericht van de politie, die een bende kidnappers had ontmaskerd. Tegen betaling leverden de ontvoerders kinderen aan een weeshuis. Zo ook Satish. Via adoptiebureau Meiling was het kind in Nederland terechtgekomen. 

De ouders stonden voor een dilemma. Ze hadden wellicht een compromis kunnen sluiten met de Nederlandse familie waar Satish terecht is gekomen om hun kind snel weer (even) terug te zien. 

Maar op advies van hun advocaat zetten ze de strijd om hun kind voort. "Het is maffia, die kinderhandel moet gestopt worden", zegt de raadsvrouw. 

De ouders hebben het niet breed in hun kleine huisje in Chennai (Madras), en wat zijn toekomst betreft is Satish wellicht beter af in nederland. Dat realiseert de Indiase moeder zich ook. "Ik weet het. Maar mijn hart zegt tegen mij: het kind is van mij." 

Meiling

De ouders willen ook dat het Nederlandse adoptiebureau in de zaak wordt gehoord, want hun advocaat vermoedt dat het bureau wist dat het kind was gestolen. In de jaren dat het weeshuis in opspraak raakte, ontving het geld van een Nederlands bureau. Dat moet Meiling zijn geweest, aldus de raadsvrouw.

Maar Meiling spreekt de beschuldigingen tegen. "Zo'n verwijt werpen we verre van ons. De organisatie Meiling is absoluut niet daarvoor opgericht", zegt vice-voorzitter Co Paulus van het adoptiebureau. "We bemiddelen omdat een kind ouders nodig heeft, niet andersom."

Meiling zegt de contacten met het tehuis al verbroken te hebben voordat duidelijk werd dat er sprake was van kidnapping. Justitie, Buitenlandse Zaken en de inspectie Jeugdzorg doen nu onderzoek. Meiling is intussen gestopt met de adopties uit India.

Toezicht

Ook oud-ombudsman Oosting doet onderzoek naar illegale adopties uit India. Volgens de autoriteiten in India gaat het in totaal om ongeveer 350 gevallen. Vijftig kinderen zouden via het verdachte tehuis in Nederland terecht zijn gekomen. Oosting bekijkt onder meer of het ministerie van Justitie goed toezicht heeft gehouden.



Buitenlandse ouders zijn het lucratiefste

Buitenlandse ouders zijn het lucratiefste

Van onze correspondente Wilma van der Maten − 25/05/07, 02:47

Er is een groot tekort aan Indiase adoptiebaby’s. Dat maakt de handel erin lucratief. Strengere wetgeving is in de maak....

In een mandje in de muur van de Indiase Raad voor het Welzijn van het Kind mogen moeders hun baby’s afgeven als ze er zelf niet meer voor kunnen zorgen. Op een afgesloten plekje achteraf, anoniem, zodat niemand ze kan zien. De meeste vrouwen nemen volgens directrice Tarini Bahadur ‘met hun volle verstand’ afscheid van het kind. Ze zijn te arm om ervoor te kunnen zorgen.

Wanneer er een nieuwe economische wees is gebracht, licht deze opvangorganisatie de politie in, die rapport moet opmaken. Vervolgens verschijnt een maand lang in lokale en landelijke kranten een advertentie met een foto van de baby, waarin de ouders worden opgeroepen zich te melden. Pas daarna mag de baby de adoptieprocedure in.

De zuigelingen die de afgelopen dagen zijn gebracht, liggen op een koele kamer rustig te slapen. In totaal 125 kleintjes. Toch is er een tekort aan adoptiebaby’s. ‘We hebben een hele lange wachtlijst’, verzucht de directrice.

De ingewikkelde adoptieprocedure doet de wachtlijst oplopen. Maar liefst vijf overheidsorganisaties zijn erbij betrokken. Pas als het certificaat ‘geen bezwaar’ van het Centrale Adoptie Onderzoeksbureau (CARA) klaar is, kan het dikke dossier naar de rechter; de nieuwe ouders mogen hun kindje komen ophalen.

Door de grote vraag is de handel in adoptiebaby’s een lucratieve bezigheid geworden in India. Door verpleegkundigen in het ziekenhuis die de moeder wijsmaken dat het kindje is overleden, of door georganiseerde bendes die het platteland afstropen.

Het meeste geld brengt een baby op die aan buitenlandse ouders ter adoptie wordt afgestaan. Volgens een CARA-rapport uit 2004 betaalden buitenlandse ouders tussen de 10.000 en 50.000 dollar voor een kind. Indiase ouders nog geen achtduizend roepie’s – zo’n 200 dollar.

Het programma Netwerk bracht deze week het verhaal van het kindje ‘Rahul’. Hij was 18 maanden toen hij in 1999 met zijn ouders op straat in Chennai lag te slapen en werd geroofd. Zijn biologische ouders eisen nu hun kind terug.

De door de overheid goedgekeurde Malaysian Social Service Society, die de adoptie van ‘Rahul’ regelde, heeft tussen 1991 en 2001 ruim 2000 kinderen uit de sloppenwijken laten stelen, waarvan er 350 aan buitenlandse gezinnen ter adoptie werden aangeboden. Vermoedelijk zijn enkele van deze baby’s ook in Nederland terechtgekomen.

De adoptie verliep volgens de wettelijke procedure. Met zelfs een rechterlijke uitspraak belandden de kinderen bij hun nieuwe ouders – die niets van al deze praktijken wisten. De directrice van het adoptiebureau vervalste de handtekeningen van de moeders waarin ze de adoptie van hun kinderen ‘goedkeurden’.

Op het kantoor van de Raad voor het Welzijn van het Kind, schudden de medewerkers meewarig hun hoofd over de opschudding in Nederland. De Indiase media heeft er nog geen aandacht aan besteed.

Volgens directrice Tarini Bahadur zou adoptie met een vervalste brief van de moeder nu niet meer kunnen. In India is een wet in voorbereiding die voorschrijft dat in het geval de moeder het kind weggeeft, ze eerst voor een commissie van het Centrale Adoptie Bureau moet verschijnen.

‘Maar als je echt de adoptieprocedure wilt omzeilen, dan zijn er wegen genoeg’, stelt ze. ‘Je koopt de politie, de rechter en immigratie om voor een paspoort voor de baby. Daarmee kom je India wel uit en Nederland ook in. Maar hoe kan Nederland deze baby het staatsburgerschap geven als de procedure niet correct is uitgevoerd?’