Home  

Al Jazeera, JCICS, and adoption (part 2)

Two days ago I posted about an adoption interview/debate on Al Jazeera’s English network. This post is about the second half of that interview with Tom DiFilipo, President and CEO of the Joint Council on International Children’s Services (JCICS), and Louise Melville, a Care and Protection Adviser for Save The Children.

You can watch the clip of the 2nd half of the interview below, and (if you’re interested) you can read my commentary below the interview. If you cannot see the interview below, you can go to the interview on YouTube.

Part 2:

(Click on the play button in the center of the box or at the bottom of the box to watch the video right here. If you click anywhere else in the box, you will be taken to YouTube’s website.)

https://youtu.be/HIHjKEliudQ

Al Jazeera, JCICS, and adoption (part 1)

The English wing of the Arab news network Al Jazeera produced a piece last month about international adoption on their “Inside Story” program: “Guatemala Adoption Scandal” aired on 13 August 2007. The program featured two interviewees who went head-to-head on inter-country adoption: Tom DiFilipo, President and CEO of the Joint Council on International Children’s Services (JCICS), and Louise Melville, a Care and Protection Adviser for Save The Children.

This piece came to my attention not because I’m a regular Al Jazeera watcher, but because Carolina Hope is a member of JCICS, which advocates for international children’s welfare and supports international adoption as a legitimate option for providing permanency to children in need of homes.

I’m dividing this topic into two posts because the television program is available on the internet in 2 segments (and I only have time to blog about one of those today!) You can watch the first clip below, and (if you’re interested) you can read my commentary below the interview. If you cannot see the interview below, you can go to the interview on YouTube.

Part 1:

(If you click on the main box, you will be taken to the YouTube website. If you simply click on the play button at the bottom of the box, you can watch the video right here.)

180 adoptive parents protest against Agstner's criminalization of international adoption

Vienna (OTS) -In an open letter, 180 adoptive parents call on lawyer Eric Agstner to end his campaign to criminalize international adoption. In the letter initiated by Bärbel Klepp together with other adoptive parents, lawyer Agstner (lawyer of trust at the Ethiopian embassy and representative of the adoptive family whose girl was adopted under unclear circumstances) is accused of not only defaming all 70 adopted children with his allegations, which he carried in the media, who came to Austria from Ethiopia via "Family For You", but also to put all adoptive parents in a bad light as "accomplices" by making sweeping statements. Quote from the letter: "We and our children will now be associated with exactly this one case by our environment.

Scandal public-privat pe banii destinati copiilor Oana Craciun

Scandal public-privat pe banii destinati copiilor Oana Craciun


Aparut in editia din 16 August 2007
SERA Romania acuza Protectia Copilului ca ii ia piinea de la gura, dupa ce noul secretar de stat a decis sa imparta banii pentru programele de interes national si cu directiile sale judetene.

Programele pentru protectia copiilor ar putea
fi blocate din cauza neintelegerilor tehnice
Peste cinci milioane de euro. Aceasta este miza pentru 2007 a scandalului care s-a iscat intre Autoritatea pentru Protectia Drepturilor Copilului (ANPDC) si SERA Romania, ONG specializata pe sprijinul copiilor si al persoanelor aflate in dificultate, care sustine ca statul i-a lezat dreptul de a beneficia de fondurile nerambursabile. Reprezentantii organizatiei spun ca au atacat deja in justitie hotarirea de guvern prin care directiile judetene de protectie a copilului au fost incluse, alaturi de ONG specializate, printre cei care pot depune proiecte pentru programele de interes national in domeniul protectiei copilului (PIN), a caror valoare pe 2007 trece de cinci milioane de euro. In timp ce SERA sustine ca statul a incalcat legea privind regimul finantarilor nerambursabile din fonduri publice alocate pentru activitati nonprofit de interes general, ANPDC spune ca exista o justificare legala si ca suspendarea acordarii banilor pe PIN-uri solicitata de ONG ar putea duce la blocarea programelor si deci la incetinirea reformei in domeniu.
Potrivit plingerii prealabile trimise de SERA, organizatia a cerut Guvernului Romaniei sa elimine DGASPC-urile din actul legislativ, pe motiv ca se creeaza o inegalitate de sanse intre cei care aplica pentru aceste fonduri nerambursabile. „Aceste institutii publice dispun de resurse bugetare, materiale si umane mult mai importante, precum si de atributul de organe ale autoritatilor publice", adica vor putea sa obtina mult mai usor cele zece procente proprii din valoarea proiectului cerute la dosar, potrivit Danei Minerva Antos, directorul financiar de la SERA Romania. In replica, Marius Lacatus, de la Departamentul juridic al ANPDC, spune ca exista o ordonanta de urgenta din 2001, care precizeaza ca fondurile pot merge atit la ONG, cit si la DGASPC-uri, si o alta, care le da dreptul sa aleaga cum sa atribuie contractele. „In anii trecuti ONG-urile nu au putut absorbi toti banii pe care noi i-am obtinut pentru aceste PIN-uri. Anul trecut, de exemplu, s-au atribuit doar 50-60% din fonduri, iar restul s-au pierdut. Pe noi nu ne intereseaza sa sprijinim ONG-urile ca sa supravietuiasca, ci ca banul public sa fie cheltuit eficient si sa se faca ceea ce trebuie pentru copii", a declarat Lacatus.
In plus, secretarul de stat Mariela Neagu a spus ca a cerut aceasta modificare a legislatiei tocmai pentru ca, in anii trecuti, ONG-urile au fost foarte criticate pentru ca au luat banii si nu si-au dus la bun sfirsit proiectele, dar si pentru o mai mare transparenta a banilor. Aceasta a mai spus ca „exista proiecte in care oricum erau implicate DGASPC-urile" si ca, oricum, „ONG-urile pot incheia si parteneriate cu institutiile statului sau intre ele, pentru a putea absorbi toti banii".

Business with adoptions

Business with adoptions

Wednesday, 15 August 2007

Someone to earn foreign parents who want to adopt children with us? Suspicions exist. Nik does not address them. Ministry of Labour as an organization has to oversee the process of intercountry adoption, sticking its head in the sand. doing some of his senior officials have ties to people involved in adoptions. What is certain is that in international adoption in Slovakia, something stinks. Authorities inexplicably prefer Italy from other countries who are already complaining about the lack of interest on our part. Thereby, the processing of applications of Italian couples showed irregularities, suggesting that the charges can enrich anyone. One of such evidence, the journal is available. These documents related to the adoption of a child in Italy. According to one Italian couple paid the Slovak side of 2500 euros more than it should - that is the equivalent of around 90-thousand. Husbands do not wish to disclose his name in the media as a child already living in Italy. In the process of acquiring the Slovakian pay € 6500, but according to their spending price lists for individual adoptions operations could exceed € 4000. ended where the remaining money is not clear. Not explain either the Center for International Legal Protection of Children, which falls under the Ministry of Labor and is responsible for international adoptions. Alena center director Matej said the questionable payments does not know anything.

"The costs associated with their applicants residing in the Slovak Republic are stipulated by the international agencies and applicants. Not register any complaints from partner institutions abroad, about the disproportionate cost to any of the services. "

Director of the Center for International ichranu children Alena Mat?jová

Trafficked Children Returned Home

Americas

Trafficked Children Returned Home

Posted on Friday, 10-08-2007

Haiti - A group of 47 child victims of trafficking have been returned by IOM and the Pan American Development Foundation (PADF) to their homes in the impoverished district of Grand Anse in south-west Haiti, where IOM will provide follow-on care and assistance.

Aged between two and seven years of age, the children had been taken from their home town of Jeremie to Haiti's capital, Port-au-Prince where they were kept at a rogue centre awaiting international adoption for a period ranging from six months to two years.

Indiase ouders eisen adoptiekind terug (Van der Maten - incl video)

Indiase ouders eisen adoptiekind terug

De ouders van een jongetje uit India dat door Nederlanders is geadopteerd, stappen naar de rechter. Ze zeggen dat het kind is gestolen en willen dat de politie hem terughaalt naar India.

De politie in India wil dat Interpol zorgt voor een dna-onderzoek in Nederland. Volgens de adoptiewet zijn de adoptieouders verplicht op die eis in te gaan.

De ouders vertelden NOS-correspondent Wilma van der Maten dat hun zoontje Satish acht jaar geleden is gestolen uit hun huis in Chennai, een stad in het zuidoosten van India. 

Het kind was toen anderhalf jaar oud. "Het was een warme nacht, ik werd wakker om 4 uur en toen was Satish verdwenen", herinnert de moeder zich. Haar man vertelt hoe hij overal had gezocht, maar dat het kind spoorloos was.

Maffia

Pas in 2005 kregen de ouders bericht van de politie, die een bende kidnappers had ontmaskerd. Tegen betaling leverden de ontvoerders kinderen aan een weeshuis. Zo ook Satish. Via adoptiebureau Meiling was het kind in Nederland terechtgekomen. 

De ouders stonden voor een dilemma. Ze hadden wellicht een compromis kunnen sluiten met de Nederlandse familie waar Satish terecht is gekomen om hun kind snel weer (even) terug te zien. 

Maar op advies van hun advocaat zetten ze de strijd om hun kind voort. "Het is maffia, die kinderhandel moet gestopt worden", zegt de raadsvrouw. 

De ouders hebben het niet breed in hun kleine huisje in Chennai (Madras), en wat zijn toekomst betreft is Satish wellicht beter af in nederland. Dat realiseert de Indiase moeder zich ook. "Ik weet het. Maar mijn hart zegt tegen mij: het kind is van mij." 

Meiling

De ouders willen ook dat het Nederlandse adoptiebureau in de zaak wordt gehoord, want hun advocaat vermoedt dat het bureau wist dat het kind was gestolen. In de jaren dat het weeshuis in opspraak raakte, ontving het geld van een Nederlands bureau. Dat moet Meiling zijn geweest, aldus de raadsvrouw.

Maar Meiling spreekt de beschuldigingen tegen. "Zo'n verwijt werpen we verre van ons. De organisatie Meiling is absoluut niet daarvoor opgericht", zegt vice-voorzitter Co Paulus van het adoptiebureau. "We bemiddelen omdat een kind ouders nodig heeft, niet andersom."

Meiling zegt de contacten met het tehuis al verbroken te hebben voordat duidelijk werd dat er sprake was van kidnapping. Justitie, Buitenlandse Zaken en de inspectie Jeugdzorg doen nu onderzoek. Meiling is intussen gestopt met de adopties uit India.

Toezicht

Ook oud-ombudsman Oosting doet onderzoek naar illegale adopties uit India. Volgens de autoriteiten in India gaat het in totaal om ongeveer 350 gevallen. Vijftig kinderen zouden via het verdachte tehuis in Nederland terecht zijn gekomen. Oosting bekijkt onder meer of het ministerie van Justitie goed toezicht heeft gehouden.



Interview Prachanda Raj Pradhan

impossible to copy the text - see link

k

PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL KOREAN ADOPTION STUDIES RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM

INTERNATIONAL KOREAN ADOPTEE ASSOCIATIONS (IKAA) GATHERING 2007 JULY 31, 2007 DONGGUK UNIVERSITY, SEOUL, SOUTH KOREA Edited by Kim Park Nelson University of Minnesota (USA) Eleana Kim University of Rochester (USA) Lene Myong Petersen University of Aarhus (Denmark)