Home  

CHSFS - lies birthfamilies

just wondering...

Hey guys...

I am a mom of a child by birth and two children from Ethiopia. Both times we used chsfs. (we would never again, ever btw...)

But you didn't want to hear that, here is what I am curious about:

Well, before I ask, I just want to say that both our adoptions had incorrect information about both our kids. First my son, we adopted him at the start of the ethiopia program for the agency. No info on papers except everyone died and Uncles name. My son came to us with full blown TB. Everywhere. Lungs, heart etc. He would of died in 6 months in Ethiopia. (He is better now btw) Oh, and the TB wasn't on the paperwork either :(

We decide to adopt our little girl. When we brought home our son, there was no video, birth family meeting etc. So we requested that while we were down in Hosanna could someone try to contact my son's uncle. They did. So we had my daughters birth mother to meet and my son's uncle showed up. First my daughters birth mom... she clearly had some sort of mental illness so who knows what is true on my daughters paperwork... ie: did they coerce her to give up my daugher? who knows with 2 interpreters and this is the kicker; an employee of chsfs told me and I quote, 'she is waiting for you to give her money now.' 'That is what all families have done here...' WHAT???
Now my son, the first words out of the uncles mouth was (in english as he was the village maths teacher), 'I am sorry, we lied.' He thought that if my son had any living birth parents that they wouldn't except him. He said he would like to show us my son's village. The dream of every AP right? Visit where their child was born etc. My life has never been the same from that moment we arrived in a beautiful valley near Doyo Gena. There were no less than 45 relatives to meet!!!! Birth mother, with a NEw Baby on her hip, birth sister just a few years older than my son. She looked just like him!! Uncles, aunties, even maternal grandmother and grandfather. I know my son was sick and probably would not of made it, and that is why they made that decision. (and his birth father did pass) Don't ask me where that new baby came from....

Ok ok , so this is what I am wondering:
Has anyone who has found out that their children had so much false info. and if it wasn't for IA, has anyone brought their children back to their first family??

And before you think that I would, forget it! My son is my son. There I said it. Have I thought about it? God yes. But no. He Is My Son now. I just need to say this because from everything that I have read so many parents are telling their stories. Has anyone ever done this and what was the outcome, we Never talk about that. The adults who have been adopted and don't believe in International adoption etc have they just ever gone back??

Also, in the eyes of the U.S. government, where do they stand? If we all come together to stop IA from Ethiopia and really tell them our stories, would they revoke our 'parentship' for lack of a better word and send them back??

These are honest questions from my heart that I have thought and thought about. Dani, what do you think?

315 arrested for human trafficking offences

315 arrested for human trafficking offences
Husna Yusop

newsdesk@thesundaily.com

KUALA LUMPUR (March 21, 2011): From Feb 28, 2008 until Feb 13 this year, 315 arrests have been made under the Anti-Trafficking in Persons and Anti-Smuggling of Migrants Act 2007, Deputy Home Minister Datuk Lee Chee Leong said.

During this period, 1,949 people have been rescued and placed under Interim Protection Order under the same law and subsequently, 735 victims have been given Protection Order.

“So far, 132 people have been charged in court under the act and of this, 31 cases have been convicted,” he told Datuk Baharum Mohamed (BN-Sekijang) who asked for the number of offenders prosecuted and convicted.

He said amendments to the act, to include smuggling of migrants, have been gazetted on Sept 30 last year and the amended act took full effect from Nov 15.

To his supplementary question, Lee told Baharum the government viewed seriously baby-selling syndicates which most of them were related to illegitimate newborns.

There were also cases of childless couples willing to spend a huge amount to get a child from the biological parents and later registering the baby as belonging to them, he said.

Lee said every birth in this country must be registered with the National Registration Department including those of foreigners and born out of wedlock, adding failure to do this is an offence under the law.

“Also, those who seek to adopt a child are advised to liaise with the Woman, Family and Community Development Ministry and register the baby as a legally adopted child.

“This is to avoid facing problems later such as with regards to issues relating to citizenship and religion,” he added.


Updated: 04:18PM Mon, 21 Mar 2011
Printable Version | Email to a Friend

Cambodia: towards the opening of adoptions

Date: 18-03-11
Cambodia: towards the opening of adoptions
E 'spent just over a year after the entry into force of the new law on international adoptions in Cambodia, which was approved in December 2009 by the National Assembly, the legislative body that regulates the country's laws on adoptions.

The new law was designed to ensure compliance with the terms of the procedures envisaged by the Hague Convention , to which Cambodia has acceded in 2007.

In line with expectations last year, so in April 2011, the Cambodian adoptions have reopened following the entry into force of the new law, the Commission for International Adoptions (CAI) in a statement on its website announced that " On 14 March, the Cambodian Minister of Social Affairs Ith Sam Heng found a positive letter of the President Giovanardi 10 February 2011 which requested accreditation under the new law on adoptions, the eight Italian institutions already licensed and operating in country.
This is a very successful Italian line and the concrete recognition of the leading institutions and conducted by the Commission in supporting Cambodia in the implementation of the Hague Convention. "

US Maintains Ban on Cambodian Adoptions

US Maintains Ban on Cambodian Adoptions

Chun Sakada, VOA Khmer | Phnom Penh Friday, 18 March 2011

US Envoy to Take Up Cambodia, Vietnam Adoption

U.S. Department of State

Baby Sellers Spark Alert

Families in the dark as adoption chief quits

Editor's note
Updated Mon Jul 12, 2010 11:16am AEST
On 8 July 2010 the ABC published a story titled "Families in the Dark as Adoption Chief Quits" and on 16 March 2010 the ABC published a story titled "Australians Caught in Ethiopian Adoption Nightmare", which reported on matters concerning the Australian Ethiopian adoption program. The ABC has received a complaint from Ato Lakew Gebeyehu claiming these publications were defamatory of him. The ABC would like to make clear that it did not intend to infer that Mr Gebeyehu created false documents or that he otherwise engaged in corrupt or improper conduct or activities detrimental to children in his care or the performance of his functions, and retracts any such inference. The ABC apologises to Mr Gebeyehu and his family for any distress caused by any readers believing he was personally involved in those matters. The ABC also acknowledges that problems in the Australian-Ethiopian adoption program were reported by the parents of three Australian families but that other parents involved in the program have reported positive experiences with the program.
Tags:
First posted Thu Jul 8, 2010 11:00am AEST
========================================
Families in the dark as adoption chief quits
By Cassie White for News Online's Investigative Unit
Updated Thu Jul 8, 2010 1:14pm AEST
African children
Adoptive familes condemned what they say is the Government's "secrecy" surrounding the real reason he stood aside. (Flickr: Mk B)
The man who ran Australia's adoption program with Ethiopia for 20 years has stood down amidst ongoing serious allegations of corruption.
Earlier in the year ABC News Online revealed allegations by adoptive parents about the program, which until the end of last month was run by Ato Lakew Gebeyehu and his wife Misrak from their transition home for children, Koala House.
Families told heartbreaking stories of their time in Ethiopia - from witnessing their new baby choking on vomit, to a young boy being kept in a bucket to stop him from moving about. One family had to pay a bribe and others found their paperwork falsified with their child's age dramatically altered.
Other families discovered their new children had parents and sibilings who were still alive, when they had been told they were adopting orphans.
Adoptive familes have welcomed the news Mr Gebeyehu will no longer be in charge, but have condemned what they say is the Federal Government's "secrecy" surrounding the real reason he stood aside.
In April Attorney-General Robert McClelland lifted a temporary suspension of the program after concerns there may have been breaches of the Hague Convention, which ensures the welfare of children is the priority and that international adoptions are used only as a last resort. Australia is a signatory to the convention, but Ethiopia is not.
Mr Gebeyehu declined ABC News Online's interview request when he was in Australia last month to renegotiate a service agreement with the Attorney-General's Department.
The department said it did raise "credible and specific concerns" with Mr Gebeyehu about the problems within the program, but was "satisfied with the outcome of those enquiries".
But rather than renew his contract, it was unexpectedly announced that he would no longer continue to run the program and there would be a six-month transition period during which the Government would find someone else.
A statement from the Attorney-General's Department says the decision to end Mr Gebeyehu's employment "was mutual".
"During discussions about a new service agreement a mutual decision was made that Mr Lakew would transition from his role as the Australian representative," said the statement.
"Mr Lakew has been undertaking this role for nearly 20 years and is in his 70s."
But the decision came as surprise even to the Australian African Children's Aid and Support Association (AACASA), which is the peak support group for adoptive parents of Ethiopian children.
Its president Gaylene Cooper says she fully supports Mr Gebeyehu and his wife, and the unexpected outcome has left the organisation in the dark.
"Nobody's really saying why; there are a lot of rumours flying around that he's retiring ... but it was not his intention to go back home from Australia without signing the new service agreement," she said.
"We can only assume that something went wrong, but we don't really know. What both parties are saying is that it was a mutual agreement, so that's really the only information we've been given. It doesn't really leave things in a very good situation.
"Obviously they've both agreed to keep it behind closed doors. Our biggest concern is, what are they going to do moving forward?
"Lakew's been doing this for 20 years, as has Misrak. From what I can gather, neither party intended this, so something's obviously not gone satisfactorily and this is what they've agreed on."
The ABC has also discovered that Mr Gebeyehu was sacked from World Vision in Ethiopia before his employment with the Australian Government.
"Ato Lakew Gebeyehu was a former agricultural employee with World Vision Ethiopia. He was dismissed more than a decade ago by World Vision for failing to attend to his duties," World Vision said in a statement to ABC News Online.
Adoptive parents of Ethiopian children told ABC News Online they are glad Mr Gebeyehu will no longer be the Australian representative and hope the change will give "future adoptive parents greater confidence in the process".
"We welcome the Attorney-General's recent decision not to renew the service agreement with Lakew and Misrak. For too long there have been too many questions about the way things have been done in Ethiopia, and it is time for a clean slate," they said.
"Adopted children have the right to know about the circumstances of their early life and this is an opportunity for adoptions between Australia and Ethiopia to move forward in transparency and confidence.
"Hopefully this will give future adoptive parents greater confidence in the process and, more importantly, children adopted from Ethiopia to Australia will have greater access to information about their personal histories with full disclosure and knowledge of all the records pertinent to their past.
"We would also like to know the reasoning behind the "mutual agreement" to end the arrangement between Lakew and the Attorney-General, so soon after the Attorney-General had expressed their support for Lakew in this role.
"The secrecy surrounding this decision only reinforces the lack of transparency that has characterised the regime in the past and serves to perpetuate the innuendo and suspicion surrounding the power of attorney and makes people wonder whether there is no smoke without fire."
In response to questions on claims of corruption within the program by parents, the Attorney-General's Department said: "Any allegations of corruption or misuse of funds should be referred to the Department for investigation."
But the ABC obtained documents showing the Howard government knew of serious concerns in 2005 and that the Rudd government was warned again in 2008 by Brussels-based human rights organisation Against Child Trafficking, after Mr Gebeyehu was arrested and held on suspicion of child trafficking.
He was later cleared after it was considered to be a case of mistaken identity, but Against Child Trafficking urged the Federal Government to look further into the case. The organisation says it received little response.

L'ambassadeur français des adoptions s'inspire des Américains

Informal translation:
The French ambassador adoptions being inspired by Americans 

Jean-Paul Monchau, France's ambassador in charge of international adoptions has met his U.S. counterpart in Washington. 

Anaïs Digonnet 
March 17, 2011 
Traveling to Washington and Atlanta in late February, Jean-Paul Monchau, France's ambassador in charge of international adoptions has met his U.S. counterpart and a specialized service provider. 
Objective: To follow the example of professionalism in American adoptions. 

I first went to Washington where I met my counterpart, Ambassador Susan Jacobs, who handles matters relating to child protection and international adoptions. 
It is important to exchange information on adoption procedures in place for example. In Atlanta, I met members of the organization Illien Adoptions International, which, in some cases, does adoption of American children to foreign countries. 

Is this the case with France? 

What they call "outgoing adoptions" in the direction of France, was one element of our conversation. The world moves. There are French or Franco-American families who could, in some cases, adopt American children. Adoption is an of increasingly complicated t and sophisticated subjec. It is both a love story, but also a history of rights. The United States is the first receiving country with 11 000 foreign adoptions made each year, while France is at the third place with 3,504 children adopted in 2010. 

What other differences are there between foreign adoptions on both sides of the Atlantic? 

Which also connects France and the United States is that these two countries have ratified the 1993 Hague Convention  on the Protection of Children and Cooperation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption. 
However, in France, adoption agencies are organized around volunteers who do this with all their heart. In the U.S., they are also non-profit structures, but there are specialist staff and employees, lawyers, doctors, psychologists, etc.. 

Is it a model for the functioning of agencies in France? 

It's part of our thinking. 
In 2008 when I took my position, there were 42 accredited organizations, primarily voluntary. I then asked them to pool their forces and regroup. Today they are 34. The next step will be to have more access to specific personnel and professionals. It is in this sense that we try to focus our efforts. In all cases, we must do everything so that children can remain in their country. If no solution, at that moment, we must consider international adoption. It is first about giving a family a child to a family. 

What are your plans to continue to improve foreign adoptions for French families? 

I just returned from Moscow where we just signed a bi-lateral agreement with Russia on international adoptions, since many French families wishing to adopt from this country. 
I'll be visiting soon to Vietnam, which this year will ratify the Hague Convention. Finally, we have a huge effort to make in Haiti, which has also signed that text. This country needs to strengthen its rules and structures in adoption. With Quebec, the United States, Italy and other European countries, we will present a cooperation plan to help Haitians put in place measures for the protection of children. Procedures must be clearer and the State needs more controls in this area. 

For more information: 

In 2010, 3,504 children were adopted abroad by French families, including 992 in Haiti, 469 in Vietnam, 969 in Colombia, 352 in Ethiopia and 301 in Russia.

L'ambassadeur français des adoptions s'inspire des Américains

L'ambassadeur français des adoptions s'inspire des Américains

DR

Jean-Paul Monchau, l’ambassadeur de France chargé des adoptions internationales a rencontré son homologue américaine à Washington.

17 mars 2011

En déplacement à Washington et Atlanta fin février, Jean-Paul Monchau, l’ambassadeur de France chargé des adoptions internationales a rencontré son homologue américaine et un organisme spécialisé. Objectif : prendre exemple sur le professionnalisme américain en matière d'adoptions.

Je me suis d’abord rendu à Washington où j’ai rencontré mon homologue, l’ambassadeur Susan Jacobs, qui s’occupe des questions touchant à la protection de l’enfance et aux adoptions internationales. Il est important d’échanger des informations sur les procédures d’adoption en place par exemple. A Atlanta, j’ai rencontré des membres de l’organisationIllien Adoptions International, qui permet, dans certains cas, l’adoption d’enfants américains dans des pays étrangers.

Est-ce le cas avec la France?

Ce qu’ils appellent ces « outgoing adoptions » en direction de la France, ont été un des éléments de nos conversation. Le monde bouge. Il y a des familles françaises ou franco-américaines qui pourraient être amenées, dans quelques cas, à adopter des enfants américains. L’adoption est un sujet de plus en plus délicat et sophistiqué. C’est à la fois une histoire d’amour, mais aussi une histoire de droit. Les Etats-Unis est le premier pays d’accueil d’enfants avec 11 000 adoptions à l’étranger réalisées chaque année, tandis que la France est à la troisième position, avec 3 504 enfants adoptés en 2010.

Quelles sont les autres différences entre les adoptions à l’étranger des deux côtés de l’Atlantique ?

Ce qui relie aussi la France et les Etats-Unis, c’est que ces deux pays ont ratifié la convention de La Haye en 1993 sur la protection des enfants et la coopération en matière d’adoption internationale. Cependant, en France, les agences d’adoption sont organisées autour de bénévoles qui font cela avec tout le cœur. Au Etats-Unis, ce sont aussi des structures à but non lucratif, mais il y a du personnel spécialisé et salarié, des juristes, des médecins, des psychologues, etc.

Est-ce un modèle à suivre pour la fonctionnement des agences en France ?

Cela fait partie de nos réflexions. En 2008, lorsque j’ai pris mon poste, il y avait 42 organisations agréées, dans le monde associatif principalement. Je leur ai alors demandé de mutualiser leurs forces et de se regrouper. Aujourd’hui, elles sont 34. La prochaine étape sera d’avoir plus recours à du personnel spécifique et professionnels. C’est dans ce sens que nous essayerons de faire porter nos efforts. Dans tous les cas, il faut tout faire pour que les enfants puissent rester dans leur pays. S’il n’y a pas de solution, à ce moment là, il faut envisager l’adoption internationale. Il s’agit d’abord de donner une famille à un enfant et non un enfant à une famille.

Quels sont vos projets pour continuer à améliorer les adoptions à l’étranger pour les familles françaises ?

Je rentre de Moscou où nous venons de signer un accord bi-latéral avec la Russie en matière d’adoptions internationales, car de nombreuses familles françaises souhaitent adopter dans ce pays. Je me rendrai aussi prochainement au Vietnam, qui va ratifier cette année la convention de La Haye. Enfin, nous avons un énorme effort à faire en direction d’Haïti; qui vient aussi de signer le texte. Ce pays a besoin de renforcer ses règles et ses structures en matière d’adoption. Avec le Québec, les Etats-Unis, l’Italie et d’autres pays européens, nous allons présenter un plan de coopération pour aider les Haïtiens à mettre en place des mesure en faveur de la protection de l’enfance. Il faut que les procédures soient plus claires et que l’Etat fasse plus de contrôles dans ce domaine.

Pour en savoir plus:

En 2010, 3 504 enfants ont été adoptés à l'étranger par des familles françaises, dont 992 en Haïti, 469 au Vietnam, 969 en Colombie, 352 en Ethiopie et 301 en Russie.

Orissa orphanage chief, caretaker held for torturing kids

Orissa orphanage chief, caretaker held for torturing kids

Bhubaneswar |Monday, 2011 11:05:05 PM IST

Hindus in Pakistan celebrate Holi

The chief and the caretaker of a private orphanage in Orissas Sundergarh district were arrested Monday for torturing children at the shelter, police said.

Global Village president Amiyabala Sethi and caretaker Runi Sethi, both women, were arrested from Biramitrapur town, about 550 km from Bhubaneswar, the local police station chief R.C.Singh told IANS.

A Tonight Special: Duchess and Daughters: Their Secret Mission

A Tonight Special: Duchess and Daughters: Their Secret Mission November 5th, 2008 by Lisa McGarry. UPDATE: One of the film makers left a very informative comment below in which he revealed that after filming this documentary, the Duchess Of York is building a huge clinic that will support mothers and stop them abandoning their children. If you wish to support this project please go to http://www.romanianrelief.org In this hard-hitting special investigation, Tonight follows Princesses Eugenie and Beatrice and their mother Sarah, the Duchess of York, on a secret mission as far removed from an official Royal visit as possible. Leaving their Royal titles and entitlements behind, Beatrice and Eugenie join their mother on an incredible journey, travelling from the suburbs of Bucharest to the streets of Istanbul, to uncover the hidden lives of children living in orphanages and institutions for the mentally and physically disabled. Prepared to do whatever it takes to discover the truth, Sarah and her daughters join ITN’s Chris Rogers and the Tonight team’s hidden cameras in a number of institutions. In the first part of the programme, Sarah and Eugenie travel to Turkey to help investigate the treatment of mentally and physically disabled children. Turkey is the next country likely to gain European Union membership and its application is being supported by the UK government. But many observers are concerned that Turkey does not meet EU human rights standards. For the first time, a British journalism team exposes the conditions inside state-run orphanages and children’s homes. As part of a reporting team led by Rogers, the Duchess goes undercover in one of Turkey’s worst institutions – capturing images that will shock and horrify. In the second half of the programme, Sarah and Beatrice travel with Rogers and Tonight to Romania to discover whether its state-funded orphanages are now meeting EU standards. The Duchess, who has worked with children’s charities for more than 15 years, watched a series of reports by Rogers three years ago, which showed that orphans were being poorly treated. She wanted to find out herself if improvements have since been made. “Everybody always rushes to what the front page says or what’s sexy or the glamorous Hollywood party where you’re raising money for paediatric aids which is fantastic and a great job but there is still a child in Romania saying ‘help me,’” says Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York. Sarah and Beatrice visit a state group home that the government has set up to improve the lot of orphans and disabled children; and they interview the gypsy mothers who feel they have no choice but to abandon their babies. Mother and daughter accompany the Tonight undercover team to film inside Romanian institutions. Thursday, 6 November 2008, 9:00PM – 10:00PM ITV1 You might also like: Nick Pickard: “Cindy’s not right for Tony” Last Night’s TV – Canoe Man Chris Moyles says he didn’t deserve a pay cut LinkWithin Follow us on Twitter! Get the latest news and chat with @unrealitytv Chat about this on the Unreality TV Forum » Posted in Factual Read more » Fergie Defends Her Secret Mission Shows You HAVE To Watch Next Week! The Duchess In Hull: ITV Sign Sarah Ferguson Duchess Of York To Get This Morning Job? The Duchess of York Returns To ITV1 For ‘The Sarah Ferguson Project’ Russell Brand To Star In Channel 4 Show With Princess Eugenie? 14 Responses to “A Tonight Special: Duchess and Daughters: Their Secret Mission” LISA SCOTT says: November 6, 2008 at 10:41 pm I WORK WITH CHILDREN IN CRISIS IN ENGLAND AND SCOTLAND, I CANT WRITE VERY WELL AT THE MOMENT AS I AM IN TEARS, UR PROGRAMME HIT ME SO HARD I WOULD LOVE TO HELP. I DONT HAVE MUCH MONEY AND HAVE A 9R OLD OF MY OWN BUT WUD LOVE TO HELP YOUR CAUSE, I HAVE SPEND A LITTLE TIME IN TURKEY AND HAVE MINIMAL LANGUAGE BUT ALL I CAN OFFER IS MY TIME AND CARE. I LOOK FORWARD TO YOUR REPLY….. LISA SCOTT julie yildiz says: November 6, 2008 at 10:52 pm I MISSED THE PROGRAME DOEA ANYONE KNOW WHEN IT WILL BE REPEATED X Naomi says: November 6, 2008 at 10:55 pm Fantastic programme. Unfortunately Romania is not in a position to change, just yet. It has improved massively since I lived and worked there, however it has a long way to go and as usual, the rich get richer and the poor stay poor regardless of the imput from foreign countries. Romanian are, by nature, very generous and will literally give you their food for the day, for the sake of hospitality. Those who work in the orphanages are largely ignorant and it is simply a way of life for them and what they do with disabled/handicapped children… not too dis-similar to some care that is given in our country… it’s a job and not a passion for those in need. We need to look at how we support countries such as this, I have stopped donating to the shoe box appeal because when I was out in Romania, I saw how the staff emptied the boxes and took the contents home, rather than it reaching those in need. When I worked in a home, people at first sponsored the English charity, but when they saw that the money was not reaching us in Romania, sent it directly to me – this needs to be addressed! As I stated earlier, the rich get richer and this is not fair. I, and my husband, would desperately love to help Romanian children but at the moment do not know how to do this best – any ideas? laura says: November 6, 2008 at 11:15 pm I have just watched the tonight special programme and am shocked and disgusted at what I saw, I remember when this problem was first brought to our attention years ago and I and i’m sure many others were reduced to tears by this complete disregard not only for human rights but for children who have been born into families that do not believe in abortion or contraception and then given basically a death sentence, I have been to turkey a few times and my view on this what I thought was a beautiful country has changed, I would love to help this cause that has been highlighted by sarah Ferguson and her daughters and I think more people should also think about this, we take so much for granted in our everyday lives and dont realise how fortunate and lucky we are to have what we have instead of moaning about what we havent,how do we get on board and start helping these causes ?? Gill says: November 6, 2008 at 11:16 pm I remember being upset the first time i saw the terrible conditions and cruelty towards the orphans in Romania and was hoping there would have been some improvement. I just wish I could help in some way. I have not been lucky enough to have children and it breaks my heart to see suvh beautiful little children treated in the most appalling way, surely this cannot continue to go on. We treat animals better than that, it is so degrading for them. Please put on the website how people can actually help, not with money but by going out there and doing something. LOR-RAINE says: November 6, 2008 at 11:21 pm TO THE POWERS THAT BE WAKE UP AND SMELL THE ROSES > NOT > ROSE MANURE MORE LIKE! IS THIS THE 21ST CENTURY…..? WHERE IS THE CARE…. ? WHERE IS THE RELEVANT MEDICAL ATTENTION….? WHERE IS THE EMOTINAL SUPPORT (STAFF INCLUDED)…? WHERE IS THE LOVE…? SUCH A PITTY IT’S TAKING A HIGH PROFILE T V PROGRAM TO OPEN OUR EYES AND TUG AT OUR HEART STRINGS WHEN WILL THE POWERS THAT BE STOP POINTING THE FINGER AT EACH OTHER? FOR THE TOTAL LACK OF EVERYTHING THESE CHILDREN / ADULTS ARE ENTITLED TOO WHO WILL DIVERT THE ENERGIES OF THOSE POLITICAL PAPER SHUFFLERS INTO ACTUALLY DOING SOMETHING PRACTICAL AND POSSITIVE? HOW LONG DO THESE CHILDREN HAVE TO EXIST IN SUCH CONDITIONS? I SAID >>> HOW LONG ?? << PLS pLS FOLLOW UP ACCEPT MY ADMIRATION FOR THE YOUNG PRINCESSES + MUM PLEASE PLEASE GO WITH IT > HERE COME THE GIRLS LOR-RAINE WOMBOURNE UK Daphne Murray says: November 6, 2008 at 11:36 pm I echo this comment completely. I want to help but have no idea how to really contribute or support. Could something be put in place such as a reward for the number of healthy children following some training and education for staff? The staff have probably lived their whole lives without any incentive or hope of legally improving their lot for so long, they might respond very positively to being shown new ways of becoming, once more, aspirational with vision and goals and rewards (in contrast to a lifetime of monotonous work without identity or ownership). It is as if a whole cultural shift is needed for the staff, and re-education into a new way of seeing life and looking forward to the future. If the staff are aspirational instead of resigned, this might help the children. We could probably do with something similar in the UK, lifting the care of children out of the list of ‘dead-end’ jobs by giving more appreciation, recognition and reward for the people who do care for children. It seems like some people cream off the rewards (emotional and status as well as financial) while leaving others to do the donkey work on very small wages because they are not deemed sufficiently ‘qualified’. I would like to see this work distribution altered and more ‘ownership’ of employment as a carer put in place, with the one who cleans and feeds having also executive responsibilities and wages . Starting with incentive and support in Roumania. Unreality Primetime | » Fergie Defends Her Secret Mission says: November 6, 2008 at 11:36 pm [...] Duchess of York has strongly defended her undercover documentary to investigate state-run orphanages in Romania and [...] Janet McCall says: November 7, 2008 at 12:08 am This programme brought tears to my eyes, the public need to be made aware of these atrocities, and the government should not be allowed to sweep this under the carpet in order to bring these countries into the EU for political reasons !! coco says: November 7, 2008 at 12:33 am how can the romanians and turks treat these children worser than animals just because the have a disability..mothers giving up there babys because they cant aford to feed them its a disgrace..this has been happenning for years and nothing has or will be dun.. as its the ignorance of the people in these countrys they choose not to care.. Monica Mc Daid says: November 7, 2008 at 8:05 am I thought it took a great deal of courage for the Duchess and her daughters to visit these institutions in Turkey and Romania and bring the living conditions of these unfortunate young people into public view. I have first hand experience of working in Romania and nearly twenty years on we are still working there. I have appealed to the EU on many occasions to look into the living conditions for many of those who are incarcerated in institutions in Romania, but no one seems to want to know or care. Many Romanian institutions, are still as bad to-day as they were in 1990 with hundreds of young people being forgotten and left to die. It is not always a case of needing money to help these young people, but educating those in authority, providing training courses in working with the disabled and psychiatrically disturbed and supporting those NGO’s who are making a difference to their inadequate system of caring for the disabled, would be a huge improvement. An example of what could be achieved can be seen from the work of the Romanian Challenge Appeal in Siret, Suceava district. They have been working alongside the Romanian charity O Noua Viata and they have made tremendous strides in offering rehabilitation to those who once lived in what was considered one of the ‘Black Holes’ of Romania. All this work was only made possible by the generosity of hundreds of volunteers over the last eighteen years. If the Charity had not worked there, several hundred young people would surely have died. I mention this because since 1990 very little support from the State or the EU has been given to the Charity, but THEY have made a difference. Why is it no one wishes to acknowledge there are still massive problems relating to the care of Romania’s disabled and abandoned young people? It takes the courage of Non Political people, like the Duchess and her family to highlight once again, the atrocities that continue to exist in these new countries that have joined the EU, or who are hoping to do so, whilst those representing us in the EU deny that these problems exist and one good example of that was Baroness Nicholson when she was the rapporteur for the EU. Thank you to the Duchess and her family for raising the publics awareness of the ‘Forgotten Children’ languishing in institutions. Kate Walsh says: November 7, 2008 at 9:54 pm How can I help? sm:ash says: November 7, 2008 at 10:43 pm The atrocities uncovered have been there for years… even more-so in Bulgaria.. another EU state… What the world doesn’t see they don’t bother about… (how can they) it’s the narrow minded attitudes of these countries… where the sole motivation is money… it’s true the rich get richer and the poor get forgotten… The mentality of the East will take at least 3-4 generations to change (so that’s about 100years)… I spent 3months in Romania, and what I saw ranged from mothers using their children (from as soon as they can walk), forced to beg in the streets and roads (to stationary cars stopped at traffic lights)… whilst the parents looked over them from a distance…. even as far as mothers offering sexual favour’s to the same in the streets and roads, still holding their babies… Worse still, to see children sleeping in door ways and heating ducts…. As the Bulgarian mafia are ripe in Romania (owning the majority of casinos), the two countries are so so similar in their treatment to the less fortunate… and both EU countries… When I was in Romania, before they joined the EU, the British government predicted 5000 Romanians would apply for visas to the UK soon as, so the UK embassy issued the necessary paper work from their embassy 3 mths before they actually joined (to prevent a back log) too which 15000 Romanians turned up… If the Romanian nationals want to leave… it makes it obvious they all understand the conditions of their own country… and search for better elsewhere… the shame of it is.. they bring with them their traditions (forced marriages) and narrow mindedness to treat such children with abuse… only recently in the UK (can’t remember the county) though the police raided a gypsy marriage between a 9yr old girl and 11yr old boy… where the Romanians proclaimed to police ‘it’s their tradition’… Abuse of any child is wrong… though years and years of mind messing; the East still think it’s normal… in any form…. Yes it’s true child cases are reported in the Western world, though it stands; it will never be as rough or dire as it is in the East. In the East it’s a way of life .. a death sentence… To change a country and make it civilized (Westernized – which is the forced standard), in order to include it into the EU, doesn’t just take rules and regulations to be followed, it takes a state of mind of the people to be changed… something that will take generations to materialise from these nations. I’ve traveled a lot and seen so many different cultures; by road from the UK as far as Vladivostok (zig-zagging through Europe), and have seen the bright lights and the dark sides of many countries… The dilemma is everywhere… some cases worse then others.. it’s true to coin the term “same problem, different country” During my time traveling I have supported two main charities, and offer my help to any organisation that needs it… from organising charity events too raising much needed funds… My own thoughts (which I have thought about many times) is to highlight the plights in Russia and the Ukraine… families forgotten & living in the forests near Moscow, too children and adults in dire conditions in areas of the Ukraine… (communism maybe dead, or so we believe) though the thoughts of it’s generation live on, strongly… and is ripe… Within any generation there are good and bad normalities…. what changes is from where ‘we’ view it from… I commend the Duchess and her daughters, to bring about an updated reality check to those that watched the program, as ever so often these issues get raised… then forgotten.. then raised… again; what we don’t see or hear about.. we don’t know… what we covert will be forgotten about… In an ideal world.. and given the era we live in.. the plights of all these children all over the world should be at the fore front.. for those governments to be forced to stand up and be counted for… A recent visit to the Ukraine I witnessed a massive protest against the EU (millions piled the streets) of Kiev, to prevent their government joining the EU (which apparently will be done by 2012).. the reason for this was the EU, the western world, deny technological advancements to the country.. technology.. yeah.. technology comes before the welfare of the nation… were it’s so obvious; if they had the technology they wanted, it would enable those government bodies to get richer and the poorer would suffer more.. as a power struggle would inevitably occur… and as always.. the less fortunate are trampled upon.. These countries ‘need to prove’ they can live together as one within their own nation primarily, to a standard of life all live, that is transparent (for the outsider).. before ever being considered for any EU involvement… It makes me ashamed to be passionate about cultures, that treat their children & adults with such contempt. Disabilities, standard of wealth and the inevitable abuse is not a way of life, its a state of mind.. and regardless of such, equality should be fought for, care, attention and the correct support needs to be fought for (yet it shouldn’t have to be this way, it should be a natural occurrence as human beings to support each other, especially those that are in need), giving the same opportunities in life to all, be it specific to that nation, or the collective that is the EU. chris rogers says: November 8, 2008 at 10:09 pm Hello all, I am Chris Rogers, the journalist who took the Duchess and her Daughters to Romania and Turkey. Thanks you so much for the feed back below which I have passed to the programmes team and to the Duchess. It is wonderful to see feed back like this after working so hard to bring the film to the public. It was not easy. I am happy to take your emails at chris.rogers@itn.co.uk but many of you ask how you can help. The Duchess is building a huge clinic that will support mothers and stop them abandoning their children. If you wish to support this project please go to http://www.romanianrelief.org Thank you Chris Rogers

s

John Ondeche, expert on children’s rights and adoption in Kenya, to visit UNC

John Ondeche, expert on children’s rights and adoption in Kenya, to visit UNC

U bent hier: Home  Articles  March 2011  John Ondeche, expert on children’s rights and adoption in Kenya, to visit UNC

John Ondeche, director of the New Life Home in Kisumu, will visit Chapel Hill the week of March 27 for a series of events sponsored byCarolina for Amani.

Ondeche is an expert on children’s rights and adoption in Kenya, and this is his first visit to the United States.

Morgan Abbott, a public policy and religious studies major from Raleigh who is pursuing a minor in entrepreneurship, founded Carolina for Amani to support the work of The Amani Children’s Foundation and the New Life Homesin Kenya.

On March 28 at 8 p.m. in Dey Hall 206, The Roosevelt Institute is sponsoring a conversation with Ondeche, who also is a member of the Kenyan Adoption Board, regarding the creation of progression of children’s rights legislation and adoption policy in Kenya.  

On March 30, from 1:30-3:30 p.m. in the Faculty Lounge of the Campus Y, Carolina for Amani is hosting a sale to welcome Ondeche to Chapel Hill. Attendees will have the opportunity to converse with Ondeche while shopping for Kenyan bags, scarves, gifts and jewelry made from beautiful hand-painted Kenyan beads from the clay of Mt. Kenya. All proceeds will benefit the New Life Homes in Kenya.

On April 1 at 2:15 p.m. in Gardner Hall 08, the economics department is sponsoring a lecture by Ondeche regarding international development, specifically in the context of New Life Homes.

CBI chargesheets six in Preet Mandir adoption racket case

CBI chargesheets six in Preet Mandir adoption racket case

By: Kaumudi Gurjar Date: 2011-03-09 Place: Pune

Investigation agency says it's detected 75 illegal inter- and intra-country adoptions

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has filed a chargesheet against six accused in the Preet Mandir illegal adoptions case, including three former trustees and a public servant.

Shady activities: Former trustee of Preet Mandir Joginder Bhasin allegedly misappropriated funds to the tune of Rs 47 lakh for personal use. File pic