Home  

Steering Committee - Better Care Network

Background

Over 60 million children have lost one or both parents throughout the world due to different causes. The HIV/AIDS pandemic is adding significantly to this number.

We know that children need and have a right to be cared for by their parents and to grow up in a family environment as much as possible. This has been recognized through years of experience and research as well as formally recognized under national and international laws. In many countries, however, few or no mechanisms exist to ensure the most appropriate placements, encourage and support guardianship and adoption arrangements, and provide support and monitoring for foster families. Much needs to be done to prevent separation by supporting families and to develop better care alternatives when separation is inevitable.

Formation of the Better Care Network

Recognizing the urgent need for concerted action, UNICEF, the Displaced Children and Orphans Fund (DCOF) and the Africa Bureau for Sustainable Development of USAID, and Save the Children UK, came together to form the Better Care Network (BCN) in 2003. This decision was influenced by the Stockholm Conference on Residential Care in May 2003 and the position paper presented there by the Save the Children Alliance, "A Last Resort: The Growing Concern About Children in Residential Care," and by workshops on better care issues in Africa and the United States. During its first two years, BCN existed as a loose affiliation of organizations exchanging information through a growing listserve. As the listserve grew, and more information was shared via the network, the organizations mentioned above, together with CARE and the Hope for African Children Initiative (HACI), agreed that BCN served a vital role, and should expand its scope through the creation of a formal secretariat to support its work. Each organization agreed to contribute resources to strengthen BCN and to serve on its steering committee. In August 2005, BCN's secretariat was established. The secretariat is based at UNICEF headquarters and operates with the guidance and direction of the steering committee. In 2007, two more steering committee members joind BCN: Bernard van leer Foundation; and Firelight Foundation.

Advisory Group - Better care network

Advisory Group

Steering Committee | Advisory Group

In January, 2006, the Better Care Network had its first Advisory Group meeting in London. The Advisory Group is made up of individuals from national and international NGO's, academic institutions, international organizations, government ministries, and independent consultants, all of whom have extensive experience in issues around care and support for vulnerable children and families. Currently, there are 53 members, 37 of which took part in the first meeting. The Advisory Group is regionally balanced, and members do not pay fees.

It was agreed at the first meeting that the Advisory Group will:

Advise on strategic priorities and workplans of the Better Care Network secretariat;

Steering Committee - Background to the Formation of the Better Care Network

Over 60 million children have lost one or both parents throughout the world due to different causes.  The HIV/AIDS pandemic is adding significantly to this number.

We know that children need and have a right to be cared for by their parents and to grow up in a family environment as much as possible.  This has been recognized through years of experience and research as well as formally recognized under national and international laws.  In many countries, however, few or no mechanisms exist to ensure the most appropriate placements, encourage and support guardianship and adoption arrangements, and provide support and monitoring for foster families.  Much needs to be done to prevent separation by supporting families and to develop better care alternatives when separation is inevitable.  National and international actors need to establish and enforce appropriate legal standards to ensure the safety, well-being, and healthy development of children placed in care, including continued efforts towards reunification and permanency.

Establishment and Expansion of the Better Care Network

Recognizing the urgent need for concerted action, UNICEF, the Displaced Children and Orphans Fund (DCOF) and the Africa Bureau for Sustainable Development of USAID, and Save the Children UK, came together to form the Better Care Network (BCN) in 2003.  This decision was influenced by the Stockholm Conference on Residential Care in May 2003 and the position paper presented there by the Save the Children Alliance, "A Last Resort: The Growing Concern About Children in Residential Care," and by workshops on better care issues in Africa and the United States.  During its first two years, BCN existed as a loose affiliation of organizations exchanging information through a growing listserve.  As the listserve grew, and more information was shared via the network, the organizations mentioned above, together with CARE and the Hope for African Children Initiative (HACI), agreed that BCN served a vital role, and should expand its scope through the creation of a formal secretariat to support its work.  Each organization agreed to contribute resources to strengthen BCN and to serve on its steering committee.  In August 2005, BCN's secretariat was established.  The secretariat is based at UNICEF headquarters and operates with the guidance and direction of the steering committee, which meets once a year.

Stone Juul Petersen, Vice President of NAC and in DanAdopt's board writes: (European)

The Nordic Adoption Council (NAC) is an association of adoption organizations in the Nordic countries. Its purpose is to work for good conditions for international adoptions in the Nordic countries. Its work must be based on the fundamental principles of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child of 1989 and the Hague Convention of 1993 on the Protection of Children and on Cooperation in International Adoptions. The work of the NAC is led by a board that is elected/appointed for a 2-year period. The Board of Directors consists of an elected chairman, a nominated representative from each of the five Nordic countries and any. an additional member. During the current parliamentary term, the extra member is a representative of Adoption and Society, while as a member of DanAdopt's Board of Directors, I have been appointed to take care of the Danish organizations' interest in the Nordic adoption cooperation.

At the NAC Board we have for some time had the EU's position on international adoptions on the agenda. This is mainly due to the entire process of adoptions of children from Bulgaria and Romania during the period up to these two countries' accession to the EU. As you know, this process resulted in the fact that there are now virtually hermetically closed off for adoptions from the 2 countries. It is also a fact that this result is directly linked to the two countries' accession negotiations with the EU. But does this indicate that the EU has a hostile attitude towards international adoptions? That is what we have set out to investigate.

We start by going back to the autumn of 2005, when the NAC was represented at a conference in The Hague, the purpose of which was to discuss the practical application of the above-mentioned Hague Convention in both donor and recipient countries. Here, a representative of the European Union presented the Commission's views, and we were, to say the least, surprised. expressed that international adoption must be seen as the last resort. This was quite contrary to the way we think and work and which we believe is the correct interpretation of the Hague Convention, namely that it is in the best interests of the child to become part of a family rather than to be placed in an institution. in his home country.

Subsequently, we have encountered similar views from several sides of the EU system, including also from an English member of the European Parliament, Baroness Emma Nicholson, who has been very involved in the process of the accession negotiations with Bulgaria and (in particular) Romania. Recently, the EU Commission has responded to a question from the Danish authorities stating, inter alia, that international adoption can only come about if the child in his home country cannot be appropriately taken care of. Later in the reply, it is stated that in Romania and Bulgaria, adequate care is generally present, which is why the Hague Convention does not oblige the 2 countries to release children for international adoption. The Swedish authorities have received the reply from Brussels that no EU decision on international adoptions exists. Confused?

The picture that draws from the purely legal side of the case is a bit complicated. Simply put, the reasoning is based on an interpretation of the above two conventions and their mutual ranking. That discussion will hardly ever solve the problem.

"CHILDREN PROTECTED ONLY ON PAPER AWAIT REAL PROTECTION" (Poupard)

(first published in English by Amici dei Bambini)

További cikkek a kategóriában: Articles in English

2007. március 15.

"CHILDREN PROTECTED ONLY ON PAPER AWAIT REAL PROTECTION"

By Pierre Poupard

For Negroponte, Move to State Dept. Is a Homecoming

Above the toilet, in the powder room at John D. Negroponte's house, a framed political cartoon hangs at eye level. In the cartoon, President Bush is congratulating Negroponte on his job as intelligence czar. Near the president, advisers stand holding memos marked "WMD" and "North Korea." They're blowing bubbles, wearing a dunce cap and a beanie.

Bush: "John, you're now in charge of all my administration's intelligence."

Negroponte: "And where would that be?"

Now, less than two years after becoming the nation's first director of national intelligence, Negroponte is leaving. Tomorrow, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee will convene hearings on his nomination as deputy secretary of state. From the outside, it seems like an unusual move, a demotion. Negroponte, 67, is stepping down from a Cabinet-level position as the president's top intelligence adviser and coordinator for all 16 U.S. intelligence services to become the No. 2 at State.

But from the inside of Negroponte's Tuscan, mustard-colored Washington home, the mystery of his career move dissipates with the steam from a pot of Earl Grey tea.

Chinees adoptiemeisje vindt ouders terug

Chinees adoptiemeisje vindt ouders terug

26 januari 2007, 09:28

HILVERSUM - Het KRO-programma Spoorloos heeft een zeer opvallend succes geboekt in het achterhalen van de biologische ouders van een uit China geadopteerd meisje.In de uitzending van komende maandag is te zien dat de biologische ouders van de 10-jarige Eline uit Noord-Holland worden achterhaald in de stad Chongqing.

Een daadwerkelijke hereniging tussen Eline en haar biologische ouders in China is er overigens nog niet geweest, aldus Paul Vertegaal, eindredacteur van Spoorloos. Volgens hem willen de Nederlandse adoptieouders dat Eline eerst rustig het nieuws op zich laat inwerken. In een later stadium kan er dan een ontmoeting komen.

Het succesvol achterhalen van de biologische ouders van Chinese adoptiekinderen is uiterst zeldzaam. In Nederland, waar ongeveer 5000 uit China geadopteerde kinderen wonen, is zover bekend een dergelijke succesvolle zoektocht nog niet eerder gemeld. Internationaal is er op internetforums wel eerder gemeld dat adoptiekinderen uit China in contact zouden zijn gebracht met hun biologische ouders, maar zonder harde bewijzen daarvoor te leveren.

The Deadly Trade of Child Organ Trafficking

The Deadly Trade of Child Organ Trafficking20/01/2007


 

Srinagar, Asharq Al-Awsat- The horrific killings of 19 children and women in the Indian slum of Nithari, close to the affluent area of Noida on the outskirts of India’s capital, Delhi, has brought into focus the horrific trade of human organ trafficking that is claiming the lives of thousands of children worldwide.

There is huge demand and a market for body parts especially eyes, hearts and kidneys belonging to children. Estimates indicate that at least one million children have been kidnapped and killed in the past 20 years for organs. A kidney or eyes can fetch up to US $10,000 and a heart could cost US $50,000 or more. Estimates further indicate that money laundering in this deadly trade accounts for up to 10% of the world's GDP, or as much US $5 trillion. As a result, the black market for children's organs is expanding and more and more children are kidnapped and killed.

While victims are primarily from Asia, Eastern Europe, the former Soviet Union, Latin America and Africa, trafficking also takes place in developed countries.

Those who take part in this trade make false promises about employment opportunities for the children and give money to the parents. Children are also stolen from orphanages, or handed over through a fake adoption process and killed for their organs. The intermediary may earn between US $50 and US $20, 000 per child according to the source countries. In many cases, impoverished parents are sometimes persuaded to sell their children's organs for as little as US $500.

According to Dr Sam Vaknin, the Senior Business Correspondent for United Press International (UPI), a kidney fetches US $5000 in Turkey. A kidney from an Indian or Iraqi child, however, would cost a mere US $2000. Such amounts are pitiful in comparison to the thousands of dollars that wealthy individuals would pay for an organ.

A recent report of a retired Italian couple, who had been arrested for buying a five-year-old Albanian boy to provide organs for a transplant for their grandson and who paid US $6000 to the trafficking gang, is a clear indicator to this trade.

In Russia in late 2000, a grandmother was arrested for trying to sell her five-year-old grandson Andrei. With the help of the boy's uncle, the child was handed over to a man in exchange for US $90,000 who would then take him to "the West," where his kidneys and other organs would be removed and sold.

In 2001, Britain was also pressed by allegations of storing hearts, lungs, brains and other organs from children in hospitals. A Dutch pathologist Dick Van Velzen at the Alder Hey Children's Hospital in Liverpool had confessed to removing hundreds of thousands of organs from children’s bodies and storing them in hospitals all over the country. The doctor told the BBC program ‘Panorama’ that body parts from living children were given to a pharmaceutical company for research in return for financial donations following management's instructions.

An inquiry by a British Medical Officer reported that in addition to over 2,000 hearts, there were a large number of brain parts, eyes taken from over 15,000 stillborn foetuses and perhaps most disturbingly of all, a number of children's heads and bodies. Professor Van Velzen, who was sacked from a hospital in Canada where he faced similar charges also worked at a hospital in Holland.

In 2004, Israeli doctors were charged of harvesting organs from Palestinian children.

In a culture where everything can be bought for a price, it seems as if the children are the ones paying the ultimate price.

Human organ trafficking has become a particularly profitable international trade. International criminal organisations have identified the opportunity created by the large gap between organ supply and demand.

There are millions of affluent individuals who await organs such as the heart, lung, liver, pancreas, kidney and intestines for transplants.

An escalating global demand for transplantable organs has been exacerbated by advances in pharmacology, better immunosuppressant drugs, and by improved medical transplant procedures. Thanks to the progress of science, the human body has become a valuable source of raw materials. Blood, organs, tissue, bone, sperm, ova, corneas, skin, embryos and placenta now all have commercial value.

A research team led by Nancy Scheper-Hughes, Professor of Anthropology at Berkeley and one of the founding members of Organ Watch, has conducted comprehensive field research into the global trafficking of human organs and documented the practices of organ harvesting in many parts of the world, notably Argentina, Brazil, Cuba, Israel, Turkey, South Africa, the United States, the United Kingdom and Asia. This research shows that abuses range from the harvesting of organs from executed prisoners in China to the removal of organs from live and dead bodies in Argentina and South Africa without the permission and knowledge of the families of the deceased.

Organ Watch has reported cases such as the charging of four American men in 1996 who illegally took bones and organs from over 1000 corpses. The men are said to have paid up to US $1000 per body to funeral home directors, with the bodies yielding up to US $250,000 dollars.

Dr. Crockett, an English kidney specialist, lost his license to practice medicine for life in 1989 because he had organized a network to sell children in Turkey to India for kidney transplants.

An American lawyer was arrested in Peru in 2004, after having exported a total of three thousand children in thirty months to the United States and Italy for organ transplants.

Latin America, Mexico and Brazil where human organ trafficking has been practiced for decades have the worst proven record of abuses against children for organ transplants.

The first official exposure was in 1986 in the Altiplano and Tamaulipas areas and the suburbs of San Luis in Latin America when children began disappearing rapidly and then returned to their families several weeks later with one kidney missing. The probe disclosed that the children had been taken to clinics near the U.S border.

A few years later, the police discovered several clandestine "nurseries" known as "casas de engorde" in Honduras. The children from here were illegally exported out of the country "for adoption." Investigations made a dramatic disclosure that the children were bought or stolen from poor families, and were sold for a minimum of US $10,000 each to organizations in the United States to be used as organ donors.

In August 1988 the revelations of Judge Angel Campos in Asuncion, Paraguay in Brazil also attracted a lot of attention. The police broke up an organization that was exporting children from Brazil in lieu of adoption.

The judge became wary about the fact that the children were being adopted by people "who did not seem to care whether the child walked with a limp, or had a harelip, or was born with an arm missing."

An adoption scandal also broke out in Italy in 1999 when 4000 Brazilian children arrived in Italy for adoption in four years. One thousand of them were located, however the other three thousand had disappeared without a trace. Two Italian judges, Angelo Gargani and Cesar Martinello went to Salvador de Bahia in Brazil. Upon their return, they warned the government that the Mafia was taking part in "human organ trafficking." These children were sent to clandestine clinics in Mexico and Thailand, as well as in Europe where they were dissected for their organs.

The trade continues to flourish even today. During the Dirty War in Argentina in the late 1970s and early 1980s, children were stolen and killed as physicians often collaborated with the military state. Anthropologist Marcelo Suarez Orozco (1987) described in lurid detail the abuse of children during the Dirty War. Babies and small children were kidnapped and then returned to their families with organs missing. In another case, in Ukraine, babies were stolen at birth and used for stem cell research. In 2005, media reports said that babies were taken from the mothers after delivery and parents were told that the babies had died after birth.

The trade, outlawed in all but a handful of countries, is legal and booming in Pakistan. According to a recent Pakistan Tribune report, frustrated by lengthy waiting lists at home and fearful of premature death, "transplant tourists," from Europe, the US and the Middle East are flocking to private Pakistani hospitals for operations which can be arranged in a matter days at a fraction of the cost in their native countries.

In 2004, similar instances of kidnapping in Afghanistan also made headlines. Ali Ahmad Jalali, the Interior Minister had also said that hundreds of children had been taken out of the country illegally in recent years, and some had been kidnapped for their organs.

Internationale adoptie Kinderen van de rekening

De adoptiepraktijk ritselt van de paradoxen. Adoptie is een daad van liefde, maar ook van handel. De procedures worden steeds ingewikkelder. Wordt de vraag in Nederland bewust ontmoedigd? En is het kinderaanbod wel zo klein?

Francine Wildenborg

19 januari 2007 – verschenen in nr. 3

 

De adoptie van het jongetje David uit Malawi door Madonna oogstte veel kritiek. Hoe zat het eigenlijk met de procedure? Had zij, de superster, die zomaar kunnen omzeilen? Hoewel het laatste woord daarover nog niet is gesproken, is één ding wel duidelijk: zo zou het in Nederland niet zijn gegaan. De Nederlandse adoptieprocedure is een proces van lange adem en taaie bureaucratie, en de procedure wordt steeds lastiger. De adoptielanden stellen steeds hogere eisen. De gewone wachtlijsten zijn al lang; wie niet volledig aan het profiel van de ideale ouder voldoet – omdat hij of zij alleenstaand is of homoseksueel, of ooit een burn-out heeft gehad – vindt moeilijk een adoptiebemiddelaar en is grotendeels op zichzelf aangewezen.