Home  

Børn til salg: De første afsløringer


GOOGLE TRANSLATION

 

Children for sale: The first revelations
20th Jun. 2010 17:00 Sport
In a special edition of news magazine 21 Sunday back in June 2007, revealed
the DR, how the Danish adoption agency AC International Child fetched the
children from corrupt orphanage in India who are accused of, inter alia,
kidnapping and child abuse.
The demand for adopted children in Denmark was even then growing partly
because of the fact that fertility was declining in the western world.
It gave birth to a cynical child trafficking where unscrupulous dealers
children began to kidnap children from their parents and sell them to
international adoption agencies.
A growing cynical money machine
In the program we met for the first time the Indian father Ramesh Kulkarni,
whose children disappeared without trace from the scandal hit the orphanage
Preet Mandir, where they stayed temporarily after their mother died. It
turned to his father's great dismay, that his children had been adopted to
Denmark against his will - through AC International Child.
To demonstrate how the illicit trafficking of adopted children was set up
the journalists behind the program a fictitious adoption agency. With hidden
cameras revealed the way children were sold for up to 7,000 U.S. Dollars
snippet on one of the orphanages where exactly AC International Child
downloaded from children in India.
After revelations
After DR's revelations of the corrupt Indian market adoptions, closed family
minister Karina Christensen temporarily for all adoptions from India.
4 months after Denmark opened again for adoptions from India. A report from
family Board - India survey acquitted both orphanage in India and the Indian
authorities in the case. At the same time gave Ernst & Young with a report
which stated that AC Orphanage had complied with the law about not paying
for the dissemination of children to Denmark from India.
The case is reopened
Now, the Indian federal police - CBI - made a new investigation of the
orphanage Preet Mandir, and the case of the father, who was tricked her
children.
Federal police report backs up the father's history - and thus there will be
again opened for debate on adoptions from India.
Send link to:
Email Facebook MSN Live
Google Twitter Myspace
More options ...
Articles by case from 2007
• Minister reopens for Indian adoptions
• Adoption Association appeals to pressenævn
• AC International Child demands retraction from DR
• Indian authorities: Father allowed adoptions
• Adoption agency received illegal agreement
• Minister reassures adoptive
• Ministers will stop adoptions from India
• adopted children can be bought or kidnapped

Read the news
• Indian adoptions: Dad tricked her children


Facts about Ramesh Kulkarnis history
• In March 2002 die Ramesh Kulkarnis wife of gulsol few months after their
last child was born.
• After a few weeks break Ramesh Kulkarni together. He can not give children
food when he is at work. Therefore, he leaves his job and moves with his
family. He realizes that he can not take care of the children, and
approximately one month after his wife's death handing Ramesh Kulkarni her
children to the orphanage Preet Mandir. He told that he could at any time
get his children back when he has come economically and mentally overpå.
• Orphanage asks him to sign a paper. The paper, which he believes is the
enrollment documents, but which in reality was bortadoption papers.
• A month after coming family to retrieve the children, but they are gone.
• orphanage Preet Mandir trying to blackmail the family and require money to
give children back. Unfortunately the family has no money.
• In spring 2003 Ramesh Kulkarni still believe that his children at the
orphanage Preet Mandir, but the children were adopted away to Denmark.
• Ramesh Kulkarni refuses permission to bortadoption and are forbidden to
come to the orphanage.
• The father feed the search with the lawyer, but must give up because of
money problems.
• First in October 2006 makes Ramesh Kulkarni yet another attempt to see the
children with his brother. They take to the orphanage, but the orphanage
show them something completely different child, not his. Protests from the
father and brother do that they will be kicked out of the orphanage.
• In April 2007 decides the whole family to ride together to the orphanage.
Here they are told that the children are in Denmark.
• The family reports the matter to local police in the city of Pune, the
police in Mumbai and child rights organization Child Line. They want their
children back.
• The case will be shown in 21 Sunday in June 2007 and get the result that
Denmark pauses for adoptions from India. But after a study from India finds
that Ramesh Kulkarni knew what papers he had signed, Denmark closes again up
for adoptions from India and orphanage Preet Mandir and AC International
Child is acquitted of the charges.
• In 2010 the Indian police discovered that the policeman who stood behind
the survey in 2007, is corrupt and in league with the orphanage Preet
Mandir. He gets fired.
• New investigation launched. It affirms that Ramesh Kulkarni got tricked
her children. At the same time the CBI, the Indian Federal Police,
discovered that there are corrupt officials employed by CARA, the Indian
adoption authority, which is also in cahoots with the orphanage Preet
Mandir.
• Now, Ramesh Kulkarni have her children back to India.

 

 

=======================================================================================

Ramesh Kulkarni er den indiske far, som deltog i 21 Søndags første afsløringer omkring adoptioner fra Indien. Han anklagede et børnehjem for at have franarret ham sine børn, men i 2007 blev der sat tvivl ved hans troværdighed. Ny undersøgelse fra i år fastslår nu, at han ikke have løjet. Børnehjemmet franarrede ham sine børn, som blev bortadopteret til Danmark. Han har ikke set dem i otte år.

Foto: DR © DR

 

Skrevet af: Tine Maria Borresø

 

Børn til salg: De første afsløringer

20. jun. 2010 17.00 Udland

I en særudgave af nyhedsmagasinet 21 Søndag tilbage i juni 2007, afslørede DR, hvordan det danske adoptionsbureau AC Børnehjælp hentede børn fra korrupte børnehjem i Indien, der er anklaget for bl.a. kidnapning og børnemishandling.  

Efterspørgslen efter adoptivbørn til Danmark var allerede dengang stigende blandt andet på grund af, at fertiliteten var faldende i den vestlige del af verden.

Det gav fødsel til en kynisk handel med børn, hvor skruppelløse børnehandlere begyndte at kidnappe børn fra deres forældre, og sælge dem til internationale adoptionsbureauer.  

En voksende kynisk pengemaskine
I programmet mødte vi for første gang den indiske familiefar Ramesh Kulkarni, hvis børn forsvandt sporløst fra det skandaleramte børnehjem Preet Mandir, hvor de opholdt sig midlertidigt efter deres mor døde. Det viste sig til faderens store fortvivlelse, at hans børn var blevet adopteret til Danmark mod hans vilje – via AC Børnehjælp.

For at dokumentere, hvordan den ulovlige handel med adoptivbørn foregik, oprettede journalisterne bag programmet et fiktivt adoptionsbureau. Med skjult kamera afslørede de, hvordan børn blev solgt for op til 7000 US Dollars stykket på ét af de børnehjem, hvor netop AC Børnehjælp hentede børn fra i Indien.

Efter afsløringerne
Efter DR’s afsløringer af det korrupte indiske adoptionsmarked, lukkede familieminister Karina Christensen midlertidigt for alle adoptioner fra Indien.

4 måneder efter åbnede Danmark igen for adoptioner fra Indien. En rapport fra familiestyrelsen - Indien-undersøgelsen frikendte både børnehjemmet i Indien og de indiske myndigheder i sagen. Samtidig fremkom Ernst & Young med en rapport, som slog fast, at AC Børnehjem havde overholdt lovgivningen omkring ikke at betale for formidling af børn til Danmark fra Indien.

Sagen er genåbnet
Nu har det indiske forbundspoliti - CBI - foretaget en ny efterforskning af børnehjemmet Preet Mandir, og sagen om faderen, der blev franarret sine børn.

Forbundspolitiets rapport bakker op om farens historie - og dermed bliver der igen åbnet for debatten omkring adoptioner fra Indien.

 

 

Fakta om Ramesh Kulkarnis historie

  • I mart 2002 dør Ramesh Kulkarnis kone af gulsot få måneder efter, at deres sidste barn er født.
  • Efter nogle uger bryder Ramesh Kulkarni sammen. Han kan ikke give børnene mad, når han er på arbejde. Derfor forlader han sit job og flytter sammen med sin familie. Han indser, at han ikke kan tage sig af børnene, og cirka en måned efter sin kones død afleverer Ramesh Kulkarni sine børn til børnehjemmet Preet Mandir. Han får at vide, at han når som helst kan hente sine børn igen, når han er kommet økonomisk og mentalt overpå.
  • Børnehjemmet beder ham underskrive et papir. Papir, som han tror er indskrivningsdokumenter, men som i virkeligheden var bortadoptionspapirer.
  • En måned efter kommer familien for at hente børnene, men de er væk.
  • Børnehjemmet Preet Mandir forsøger at afpresse familien og kræver penge for at give børnene tilbage. Desværre har familien ikke pengene.
  • I foråret 2003 tror Ramesh Kulkarni stadig, at hans børn er på børnehjemmet Preet Mandir, men børnene er blevet bortadopteret til Danmark.
  • Ramesh Kulkarni nægter at give tilladelse til bortadoption og bliver forbudt at komme på børnehjemmet.
  • Faderen sætter gang i søgningen med advokat, men må give op på grund af pengeproblemer.
  • Først i oktober 2006 gør Ramesh Kulkarni endnu et forsøg på at se børnene sammen med sin bror. De tager til børnehjemmet, men børnehjemmet viser dem nogle helt andre børn, der ikke er hans. Protester fra faderen og broderen gør, at de bliver smidt ud af børnehjemmet. 
  • I April 2007 beslutter hele familien at køre sammen til børnehjemmet. Her får de at vide, at børnene er i Danmark.
  • Familien melder sagen til det lokale politi i byen Pune, til kriminalpolitiet i Mumbai og børnerettighedsorganisationen Child Line. De vil have børnene tilbage.
  • Sagen bliver vist i 21 Søndag i juni 2007, og den får den konsekvens, at Danmark stopper midlertidigt for adoptioner fra Indien. Men efter at en undersøgelse fra Indien fastslår, at Ramesh Kulkarni godt vidste, hvilke papirer han havde underskrevet, lukker Danmark igen op for adoptioner fra Indien, og børnehjemmet Preet Mandir og AC Børnehjælp bliver frikendt for anklagerne.
  • I 2010 finder indisk politi ud af, at den politimand, som stod bag undersøgelsen i 2007, er korrupt og i ledtog med børnehjemmet Preet mandir. Han bliver fyret.
  • Ny undersøgelse iværksættes. Den slår fast, at Ramesh Kulkarni fik franarret sine børn. Samtidig finder CBI, Det Indiske Forbundspoliti, ud af, at der er korrupte embedsmænd ansat i CARA, den indiske adoptionsmyndighed, som også i ledtog med børnehjemmet i Preet Mandir.
  • Nu vil Ramesh Kulkarni have sine børn tilbage til Indien.

Adoptioner fra Indien fortsætter

Adoptioner fra Indien fortsætter

Mandag d. 21. jun. 2010; kl. 19:36 af nabr, ritzau for

TV 2 Nyhederne (opd. d. 21/6 2010; 19:36)

Danske par, der venter på et adoptivbarn fra Indien, kan foreløbig ånde lettet op. Adoptionerne

fra Indien fortsætter nemlig indtil videre.

Det har Familiestyrelsen besluttet trods nye oplysninger fra indisk politi om, at indiske

adoptivbørn kan være blevet franarret deres biologiske forældre.

"På det foreliggende grundlag fortsætter vi adoptionerne fra Indien," oplyser Familiestyrelsen.

Hvis svar mangler stopper adoptioner

Samtidig vil Familiestyrelsen kontakte det ministerium i Indien, der har ansvar for adoptionerne,

og bede det om inden for de næste to måneder at redegøre for, hvorfor der er blevet sået tvivl

om adoptioner af indiske børn.

"Og har vi ikke et svar inden senest august, agter vi at stoppe for adoptionerne," meddeler

Familiestyrelsen.

Børn narret fra enlig far

De nye oplysninger om indiske adoptivbørn kom frem i DR 21 Søndag. Her fremgik det, at

indisk politi mener, at et børnehjem i Indien har narret børn fra en indisk enlig far, hvorefter

børnene blev adopteret til Danmark.

Tv-programmet fortalte historien første gang i 2007. Dengang lukkede Familiestyrelsen for

adoption fra Indien, indtil en undersøgelse viste, at manden godt var klar over, at børnene blev

bortadopteret. Herefter blev der igen åbnet for adoptionerne.

Adoption fra Indien i 21 Søndag på DR 1

PRESSEMEDDELELSE:
Adoption fra Indien i 21 Søndag på DR 1
Udsendelsen 21 Søndag på DR 1 bragte i dag søndag den 20. maj en ny gennemgang af Indienssagen fra 2007. Det gjorde man på baggrund af nye oplysninger fra en igangværende politisag i Indien. Udsendelsen drejede sig dengang som nu om lovligheden af en indisk fars bortadoption af sine børn til Danmark.
AC Børnehjælp valgte ikke at stille op til interview i 21 Søndag primært af hensyn til den danske adoptivfamilies ønske om anonymitet, og fordi de nye oplysninger stammer fra en uafsluttet sag i Indien.
AC Børnehjælp tager den nye politiundersøgelse meget alvorligt. Forløbet er tragisk for alle involverede – såvel den biologiske familie i Indien som børnene og deres adoptivforældre i Danmark. International adoption skal foregå til barnets bedste og nøje følge både lovgivningen i barnets oprindelsesland samt dansk adoptionslovgivning.
De nye oplysninger er del af en større politisag mod Mr. Bhasin, som var leder af børnehjemmet Preet Mandir. AC Børnehjælp bifalder, at det indiske politi følger op herpå. Vi afbrød samarbejdet med Mr. Bhasin tilbage i 2003, netop pga. rygter om, at institutionslederens metoder ikke var i overensstemmelse med gældende lovgivning i Indien og Danmark. 
Efter 21 Søndags udsendelse den 20. maj 2007 iværksatte Familiestyrelsen under Justitsministeriet en selvstændig undersøgelse sammen med de indiske myndigheder. Her konkluderede man, at "det er styrelsens opfattelse, at den indiske procedure er fulgt, herunder at der foreligger det nødvendige samtykke fra børnenes far til international adoption".
Erfaringerne med Indienssagen har bevirket, at AC Børnehjælp har skærpet vores krav til vores partnere. Vores nuværende samarbejdspartnere i Indien er derfor nøje udvalgt og undersøgt, således at vi kan nære tillid til, at fokus er på, at adoptionsformidlingen skal være til barnets bedste samt foregå på et etisk grundlag.
KONTAKT:
  • AC Børnehjælps familier på ventelisten til Indien kan kontakte adoptionsrådgiver Anne Mogensen på am@a-c.dk med spørgsmål.
  • Pressekontakt er direktør Jonas Parello-Plesner på mobil 5134 5311 eller på mail: jpp@a-c.dk

SF vil stoppe adoptioner fra Indien

SF vil stoppe adoptioner fra Indien

Danmark bør stoppe adoption fra Indien, indtil forholdene er undersøgt til bunds, kræver SF. Indisk politi mener, at forældre franarres deres børn til adoption.

SF vil stoppe adoptioner af indiske børn til Danmark, indtil det er grundigt undersøgt, om forældre i Indien bliver franarret deres børn til adoption.

Det siger partiets retsordfører, Karina Lorentzen, efter nye oplysninger i DR-programmet 21 Søndag. Heraf fremgik det, at indisk forbundspoliti mener, at et børnehjem i Indien har narret børnene fra en indisk mand, hvorefter børnene blev adopteret til Danmark.

- Oplysningerne har skabt så megen usikkerhed omkring indiske adoptioner, at det er uholdbart at gennemføre flere, før vi har vished for, at det kan foregå på en betryggende måde, siger Karina Lorentzen.

Hun vil bede justitsminister Lars Barfoed (K) undersøge sagen og tage stilling til, om der skal indføres et midlertidigt stop for adoptioner fra Indien.

Tv-programmet fortalte historien allerede i 2007, hvorefter Familiestyrelsen lukkede for adoption fra Indien. Men en undersøgelse kom frem til, at manden godt var klar over, at børnene blev bortadopteret. Derfor blev der igen åbnet for adoption fra Indien.

Nu bakker det indiske forbundspoliti ifølge 21 Søndag op om manden. Efter at Ramesh Kulkarnis kone døde, afleverede han for otte år siden sine børn på børnehjemmet Preet Mandir. Ifølge manden selv skulle børnene kun være midlertidigt på børnehjemmet, indtil han igen kunne tage sig af dem.

Men han kom aldrig til at se dem igen, for de blevet adopteret til Danmark. De papirer, som Kulkarni skrev under, viste sig nemlig at handle om bortadoption og ikke indskrivning på børnehjemmet, som manden troede.

/ritzau/

In search of mother with an aching heart

Wednesday, Aug 25, 2004

In search of mother with an aching heart

By K. Venkateshwarlu

 

 

French Supreme Court Recognizes Foreign Gay Adoption

French Supreme Court Recognizes Foreign Gay Adoption

by GILLES CUNIBERTI on JULY 9, 2010

Yesterday, the French supreme court for private and criminal matters (Cour de cassation) held that an American judgment permitting the adoption of a child by the female partner of the mother was not contrary to French public policy and could be recognized in France.

The women were two doctors living in the United State. They had entered into a domestic partnership. The mother was a American national, while her partner was French. After the child was born, the Superior Court of the county of Dekalb, Georgia, permitted the adoption of the child by the French female partner of the mother in 1999. As a consequence, the birth certificate mentioned that the American woman was the mother, and that the French woman was a parent.

The Paris court of appeal had denied recognition to the judgment. The appeal against their decision is allowed by the Cour de cassation which rules that the American judgement is recognised. The French text of the judgment of theCour de cassation can be found here.

This decision is presented as historic by French newspaper Le Monde.

Legislation to allow adoption of married parents' children

Legislation to allow adoption of married parents' children

CAROL COULTER Legal Affairs Editor

LEGISLATION IS being drafted that will provide for the adoption of the children of married parents.

The Bill, to be published prior to the children’s rights amendment, probably after the summer recess, will also allow for the tracing of the parents of adopted people, Minister of State for Children Barry Andrews has said.

Speaking to The Irish Times , Mr Andrews said the Bill was being prepared now that the Adoption Bill 2009 – providing mainly for the Hague convention on inter-country adoption to be part of Irish law – had been passed. It will come into operation on November 1st.

The proposed children’s rights amendment to the Constitution will, among other provisions, allow for the adoption of the children of married parents in circumstances less extreme than exist at the moment. In order for such children to be adopted, including being placed voluntarily, the parents must fail in their moral and physical duty to the child, and be likely to continue to do so until the child is an adult, for the child to be free for adoption.

This rules out their adoption in circumstances where, for example, one parent is dead and the other severely incapacitated. The Oireachtas committee on the children’s rights amendment proposed that the Constitution be amended to change this.

The new Bill would deal with such issues as what “failure” in their parental duty meant, and the length of time for which this needed to persist, Mr Andrews said. It would also deal with the length of time a child would be in the care of foster parents or potential adoptive parents before he or she could be adopted.

He said the proposed legislation and the amendment would clear the way for more domestic adoptions. The staff who worked on the 2009 Bill are working on this and on the tracing legislation.

The area is a complex one because of a Supreme Court judgment underlining the right to privacy of parents who gave their children up for adoption on the understanding they would not be contacted. “We need to find a balance between the right to know who your parents are and the right to privacy,” he said.

The information that would be provided for would include medical records and the nature of the relationship between the parents. “We want to spell out the greatest possible amount of anonymised information that is possible to be given,” Mr Andrews said.

Asked whether this would include the identity of parents, he said it would be hard to provide this and trust the recipients not to approach parents. “The Supreme Court was very clear [that] you can’t defeat the privacy of the person who gave up the child. But that was in relation to the adoption legislation in force at the time. We could modify it in the light of later adoption legislation.”

Referring to the situation in the UK, where adopted children have the right to their parents’ identity, he said there was no constitutional right to privacy there, and open adoptions existed in the UK since 1975, which was not the case here.

Asked whether both matters would be dealt with in the same Bill, he said it was likely they would be dealt with separately, but that may change if the drafters found it more appropriate to bring the two pieces of legislation together.

The recently passed Adoption Bill provides for the replacement of An Bord Uchtála (the Adoption Board) with a new adoption authority, which will have members from a number of specified relevant disciplines. Arrangements will be made to ensure continuity between the Adoption Board and the new authority, the Minister said. It will exercise a quasi-judicial function and regulate mediation agencies and other bodies involved in the process.

Under the new Hague regime the children adopted are likely to be slightly older, Mr Andrews said, to ensure the option of a domestic adoption has been exhausted. This could mean that the children could have more attachment issues, and they and their parents would need more support, he said.

White House Backs Kenyan Constitution Allowing Abortion

White House Backs Kenyan Constitution Allowing Abortion

By Tess Civantos

Published July 06, 2010

 | FoxNews.com

The Obama administration is offering incentives to Kenya to approve a controversial new constitution that would legalize abortion for the first time, promising that passage will "allow money to flow" into the nation's coffers, including U.S. aid.

But there's a hitch to that pledge. A federal law known as the Siljander Amendment passed in 2006 makes it illegal for the U.S. government to lobby on abortion in other countries -- and three U.S. lawmakers say they want a federal investigation into the promises made by the administration.

Kenya has long been ripe for a new constitution, one that will balance power in the country and prevent the kind of violent rioting that followed Kenya's 2007 presidential election.

The Obama administration has vocally expressed enthusiasm for the new constitution, which it says will provide for easier transition of power through more balanced branches of government.
But according to anti-abortion groups in and outside of Kenya, the constitution will cause harm to the nation by overturning its ban on abortion.

Article 26 of the proposed constitution states that abortion is allowed if "in the opinion of a trained health professional, there is need for emergency treatment, or the life or health of the mother is in danger or if permitted by any other written law."

The problem for some is how much that provision is left open to interpretation.

"There are parts of this constitution that violate human dignity," Rebecca Marchinda, director of advocacy for the human rights coalition World Youth Alliance, told FoxNews.com.

"A trained health professional could be anyone who has health training, including a student or a physical therapist," Marchinda said. "The provision is also broadly defined to include any kind of health, including psychological health or emotional health. Finally, this clause opens the way to create other laws that make abortion available on demand."

In a speech delivered last month in Kenya, Vice President Joe Biden urged the Kenyan people to pass the constitution in a referendum scheduled for Aug. 4.

"The United States strongly supports the process of constitutional reform. ... Dare to reach for transformative change, the kind of change that might come around only once in a lifetime," he said.

"If you make these changes, I promise you, new foreign private investment will come in like you've never seen," Biden added.

According to reports, U.S. ambassador to Kenya Michael Ranneberger told Kenyan officials in May that the U.S. has offered $2 million in taxpayer funds for "civic education" to support the process of enacting a new constitution.

That's a problem for Republican Reps. Darrell Issa of California, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen of Florida and Chris Smith of New Jersey. In letters to the U.S. Department of State, U.S. Government Accountability Office and U.S. Agency for International Development, the lawmakers said they want a federal probe to determine whether the administration violated federal law with its assistance.

"Any advocacy by the administration in support of the proposed new constitution would constitute lobbying for abortion," reads one letter sent in May. "There is no doubt that the administration is advocating for adoption of the proposed constitution."

Issa's office confirmed that the congressman has not spoken to Biden regarding the request for a federal probe, and they did not say whether they had received a response from the inspectors general.

Funding from the United States, meanwhile, is the least of the Kenyan pro-lifers' worries. They are facing violent and even fatal opposition from constitution supporters within their own nation.

A peaceful anti-constitution protest and prayer service on June 13 turned violent when two bombs exploded, killing six people and injuring over 100 more, according to Kenyan newspaper The Standard.

Not only are constitution opponents being bombed, their leaders are being arrested. Three members of the Kenyan parliament were taken into custody on June 16 on charges of alleged hate speech relating to their prominent leadership in opposing the new constitution.
Three other members of parliament were also accused of hate speech, including Higher Education Minister William Ruto, widely seen as a leader in the campaign against the new constitution.

Obadias Ndaba, who works in the World Youth Alliance branch in Kenya, told FoxNews.com that the government "is trying to do everything it takes to pass the constitution."

"The US VP Biden, while in a visit here, promised that Obama would visit the country only if the constitution is passed," he wrote in an e-mail Friday.

"What is clear is that we are having a powerful elite in government supported by foreign powers against the weak forces of church leaders (plus few politicians under threat of hate speech) with huge support in the population but with less means and security to get their message across," he wrote.

Requests for comment sent to the vice president’s office were not returned.

Bulgaria strives to end plight of abandoned children

Bulgaria strives to end plight of abandoned children

SOFIA — Kuna, a pretty eight-year-old girl, lives in an orphanage in Bulgaria, abandoned by her family, but her Roma origins mean her chances of adoption are almost nil.

"Kuna's features do not reveal her origins, but her documents dissuade adoption candidates," said Nadya Dzhunova, director of the Slaveykov children's home in Sofia.

Indeed, Bulgarians are still highly prejudiced against the poor Roma minority, suspecting them of abandoning children at a young age only to claim them back when they are old enough to earn money.

At Slaveykov, Kuna lives alongside 61 abandoned children aged seven to 18, including six who are handicapped.

Her parents only kept two of their seven children but they refused to give up their parental rights over the little girl and four of her siblings, meaning the children could not be put up for adoption and would have been condemned to live in orphanages until adulthood.

But a new law that came into force in October means children who have spent more than six months in institutions and have not been taken back by their parents can now be put up for adoption, without the parents' approval.

This has already allowed Kuna and her four siblings to make their way onto adoption lists.

The practice of leaving children to the state's care due to poverty or a child's disability goes back to communist times and Bulgaria now has one of the highest rates of abandonment in the European Union, with some 6,730 children left to the care of state institutions.

"The problem is difficult to solve after 50 years during which the state readily placed in an institution any child at risk," deputy social minister Valentina Simeonova explained.

This was the case for eight mentally disabled teenagers, who after years in a dilapidated children's home in the remote village of Mogilino in northeastern Bulgaria, recently moved into their own house in the western village of Glozhene.

Confined to a wheelchair, 20-year-old Sergey can neither walk nor talk. Blind since birth, he was often tied to his bed at Mogilino to keep him still, according to the nurses at his new home in Glozhene.

Sergey and several dozen other children and adolescents with disabilities lived at Mogilino behind "a barbed wire fence and barred windows," cared for by unqualified, indifferent staff, according to Branimira Pavlova, head of a daycare centre in Teteven that temporarily hosted the eight youngsters.

The utter misery there sparked a nationwide fund-raising campaign, supported by UNICEF, the UN Children's Fund, and private bTV television, to build new homes for the children and eventually close down the orphanage.

The government now plans to shut by 2013 all 27 remaining institutions for children with serious disabilities. Most of these facilities are situated in poor remote villages.

Meanwhile, it is encouraging the creation of daycare centres like the one in Teteven, where teams of nurses, psychologists and teachers can take care of children with disabilities during the day, allowing the parents to go work.

This would help battle high abandonment rates, Pavlova said.

Almost 98 percent of abandoned children in Bulgaria still have parents somewhere and social workers are seeking to encourage them to take their children back or place them in foster care.

Some 1,200 children aged 12 and above, or with grave disabilities, have been put on a special list for adoption abroad, mainly in the United States, Canada, Sweden and Italy, where families are more open to adopt these children.

Authorities are also seeking to limit the number of abandoned babies, aged three and under, which currently number 2,300 in all of Bulgaria.

In 2009, 536 Bulgarian babies were adopted domestically and 103 abroad, including 23 percent who had some sort of disability.

"If we manage to do away with abandonment at birth, we will manage to reverse the high number of children in institutions," Simeonova said.

Everybody’s Children

July 5, 2010
Everybody’s Children
By Diana Markosian
RIA Novosti
http://www.russiaprofile.org/files.site/bw.gif
The International Scandals Surrounding Foreign Parents Who Abuse Adopted Russian Children Have Obscured the Challenges that Russian Orphans Face at Home

Tucked quietly away in an isolated corner of Russia, far from civilization, is an orphan village called Kitezh Children’s Community. The houses are shaped like castles, the sun is beaming and a dozen or so happy children are playing in the yard, just like in every good fairy tale. But this is not your average Russian orphanage. Only a few lucky orphans from the thousands growing up in modern Russia are privileged enough to live here; volunteer parents, able to provide a home and a future, officially adopt the children.

Twenty-five year old Maria Pichugina is the director of the Kitezh center in Orion, about 60 kilometers south of Moscow. She has spent most of her life in the orphanage, but not as a foster child. Pichugina’s mother moved to Kitezh ten years ago with her two daughters to devote her life to the plight of Russian orphans. 

The community was set up nearly 20 years ago by former Moscow-based radio journalist Dmitri Morozov in response to the growing number of street children in Russia, and as an alternative to the state institutions. “In the 1990s, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, there were a lot of kids who didn’t have homes, and no one cared,” Morozov said. “People were too busy worrying about making money. There was an attitude on behalf of the government and on behalf of the people that this was not our problem.”

The situation has barely improved since then. According to a 2008 trial census, Russia has around 700,000 orphans. The vast system of orphanages presently in place dates back to the early Soviet period, when many orphans appeared on the streets following the Civil War, and orphanages became part of the communist education system. Since then it has grown and perpetuated itself, while alcoholism and the general destructive tendencies in society supplied children in need of parental care. Up to 80 percent of children in today’s orphanage system are so-called “social orphans” who have been taken by the authorities away from their problematic families.

The recent cases of mistreatment of Russian adoptive children in the United States have brought the pitfalls of international adoption into the limelight, but several fundamental questions have been brushed over: why does Russia have so many orphans in the first place? And what is the country doing to solve the problem?

More than 1,500 Russian children were adopted in the United States in 2009, putting Russia in third place in the number of children taken from there after China and Ethiopia. Over the years, Morozov has kept a close eye on Russia’s adoption trend, and believes that international adoption is the country’s way of ignoring the actual problem. “It seems to be the easiest way for bureaucrats who don’t care very much about what is really happening,” said Morozov. “In the last few years we have actually been moving in the right direction. I see that the government is trying to develop the structure: for instance, non-governmental organizations are emerging. But Russia is a big society and we have to contain the problem.”

For years, a major hurdle in the adoption process in Russia was its bureaucracy. Deacon Alexander Volkov adopted a son three years ago. The process itself, he said, was the most difficult part, and for many Russians it is an ordeal they are not willing to go through. “It was very hard for years to adopt a child. The system just didn’t allow it, and people didn’t want to deal with it,” said Volkov. “Now the government and volunteers are starting to take care of this situation. Many orphanages are even closing because people are adopting so many children.”

But while negotiations on an agreement to regulate Russian-U.S. adoptions draw to a close, Russia’s domestic orphan problem lingers on. The Russian Children’s Welfare Society (RCWS), a non-governmental organization based in New York with an office in Moscow, estimates that the proportion of declared orphans is four to five times higher in Russia than in Europe or the United States. Some 30 percent live in orphanages. Most are children who have been either given up by their parents or removed from dysfunctional families by the authorities. As of 2009, there were 2,176 orphanages in Russia. That number has grown by more than 100 percent in the last decade, reports RCWS, whose main mission is to help Russian orphans. 

Morozov believes that the problem is twofold: the number of abandoned children is rising but too few Russians are willing to take them in as their own. At Kitezh, things are different, he says; adoptive parents are not only willing to look after the children, but they also devote their entire lives to the cause. 

Pichugina and her husband have adopted five children in the past four years. She is now expecting her first biological child. “I don’t even think of them as anyone else’s children, but my own,” said Pichugina, whose own mother has adopted ten children in Kitezh. “Once you’ve taken them in you are inseparable from them. They are my own children.”

Anastasia and her younger sister Vera have lived with Pichugina for four years. Though at first glance they may act like the average teens, the two are wise beyond their years. They have to be, they say. Their mother and younger brother both died four years ago. “After she died, our father was too drunk to take care of us, and he left us,” said Anastasia, who is now 14. “Sometimes I feel sorry for myself, and just say: ‘why me?’ Life is not fair. But you have to get over it. I can’t do anything about what happened.”

The attitude toward orphans in Russia is slowly shifting. There is no overnight solution. Anastasia knows that her past will not define her, but she is part of the minority. The future for most Russian orphans is still rather nebulous