With the introduction of the law on adoption in 1956, the legislature departed from two ideas, which in hindsight both not proved to be correct.
In particular, the introduction of adoption as being a child protection measure was strongly criticized in the literature. As noted rightly by Delfos and Doek, the characteristic of child protection is that it is never permanent, whereas adoption in principle is permanent. A measure of child protection is also characterized by the fact that in the interest of the child there is an intervention into the exercised authority over him. Parental authority is limited by that measure.
In contrast, adoption confirms legally the existing factual relationship between foster parents and the foster child and builds the authority of the foster parents who have custody into parental authority.
Also Red- Boer found that the "to consider adoption for political reasons as a measure child protection, leads to a lame comparison. "In that context, she pointed out that child protection measures such as exemption from the parental rights or withdrawal of the parental rights do not lead to the loss of familial ties, while adoption does indeed break the existing family ties indeed to then put new family relationships in their place.
From the development that the legal form of adoption after 1956 has gone through, and which this chapter will look at closer, will also show that this idea has been abandoned.