LAVA and AVGG have applied for and received a subsidy from Inea for organizing the adoption breakfast . In accordance with the subsidy conditions, we have
listed Inea's contribution on the website.
We were surprised to learn that Inea
distanced itself so openly from the meeting on Linkedin on 12 March 2025. In the relevant Linkedin post, Inea states that the
final implementation of the meeting does not fit within Inea's mission and vision.
First of all, we are curious about what Inea based this judgment on. LAVA and AVGG
organized this meeting to update members of parliament and their employees on the
(im)possibilities of the phase-out plan, both legally and socially, emotionally and socially.
In our opinion, the meeting worked out exactly as indicated in the request for proposals.
In addition, permit holders, parents and adoptees were involved in the organization and the
organization was organized by two associations together. It is precisely on this subject that it is good to
seek connection and in our opinion this fits within Inea's mission and strategy.
In addition, Inea's attitude surprises us even more, because the approval for the subsidy
was only given on March 6 (one day after the meeting). Due to malfunctions in the system, Inea was behind in
processing applications. In our opinion, Inea was therefore able to
inquire in advance about the elaboration of the meeting at all times.
We deeply regret that Inea, after the commotion caused by a small but very verbal group of
radically critical people, feels compelled to self-censor its own decisions
. In our opinion, this shows that Inea is mainly there for those who
are critical of adoption. Inea should be objective and independent and for all adoptees. However, because
this post also suggests that LAVA and AVGG have done something that would not be in line with
the application, we feel compelled to publicly distance ourselves from these claims. In addition,
we will file a formal complaint about this course of events.