Home  

Automatic reply USEmbassy


 

U.S. Embassy Brussels Press

 

Mon, Feb 10, 10:42 AM (1 day ago)

 

 

to me

 



Thank you for your e-mail.  Please note, this mailbox is for press inquiries only.  If yours is a press inquiry, we will get back to you shortly.

Lost Roots A Sri Lankan Adoptee’s 20-Year Search for her Birth Family

For many other adoptees they were able to find their biologcal family by doing DNA tests. They were the fortunate ones to be reunited with their family. This begs the question as to when it will be my turn

Fardau’s search has led her back to Sri Lanka five times since 2005. Her adoption papers listed a woman named Redige Baby Nona as her birth mother, but a DNA test in Colombo proved otherwise

For 20 years, Fardau Huisman has been searching for a missing piece of her identity—the truth about her birth family. Born in Sri Lanka in January 1985 and adopted by a Dutch family as a baby, she grew up in Holland with little knowledge of her origins. Her Sri Lankan name was Ganga, but the identity of her biological parents remains a mystery.

Fardau’s search has led her back to Sri Lanka five times since 2005. Her adoption papers listed a woman named Redige Baby Nona as her birth mother, but a DNA test in Colombo proved otherwise. That revelation uncovered a darker truth—Baby Nona

How Hungary takes children away from poor parents

Children are separated from their parents unjustly and for years, or never allowed to return home: that is what Hungarian child protection has done in recent years. The Flemish government is going to investigate in Hungary whether adoption from that country may still be possible.


'If I hadn't gotten help, my children wouldn't be with me now.' Barbara, a woman with curls and an engaging smile, sits beaming with pride in a grimy armchair. Next to her sit four mischievous little rascals, her sons. They were taken away one by one by the Hungarian child protection services. The reason? Poverty in the family.

Civil rights organization TASZ (also known abroad as HCLU) helps Barbara and other parents to challenge unfair decisions. For Barbara, it took years, and she will never get that lost time back. She is the victim of a child protection system that is flawed on all sides.

'Families in Hungary should primarily solve their own problems, rather than seek support and guidance from the state,' says the international children's rights organisation ISS. In 2022, the organisation conducted an analysis of adoption and child protection in Hungary on behalf of the Flemish government. The aim? Based on this information, the Flemish Centre for Adoption will decide whether adoptions from Hungary will continue to be permitted in the future.

Poverty or neglect?

[Life] "8-day-old newborn baby forcibly separated from mother... isn't this baby kidnapping?"

"There was even an incident where a 3-year-old and a 1-year-old sister were forcibly taken away by the local government as if they were kidnapped"

“Indiscriminate child separation is taking place in Korea”… Interview with Kim Soo-bin, President of the Nabu Association

Editor's Note= The interview article with Kim Soo-bin, the president of the 'I am a Parent Association', is so long that it will be sent in three parts. This is the first article, and it contains information about his own growth process, his experience of separation crisis from his children, and the forced separation of infants. The second article, which will be sent early next week, will cover various forms of forced separation. The third article, which will be sent early the following week, will cover institutional and structural issues related to child separation. Life is an autobiographical interview, so it contains many personal stories and personal photos.

Kim Soo-bin, Chairman of the Nabu Association, and his first baby

Kim Soo-bin, Chairman of the Nabu Association, and his first baby

‘Time running out’ for UK to apologise over forced adoptions

Campaigners demand government issue formal apology to women forced to give up their babies in 1950s-70s

 


Time is running out for the UK government to issue a formal apology to women who were forced to give up their babies for adoption in the 1950s, 60s and 70s, campaigners have warned.

Most of the estimated 185,000 women involved in forced adoptions are now in their 70s and 80s, and some have died without an apology on behalf of the state being issued.

 

Young girl with heart conditions denied being added to transplant list over vaccination status, family says

A mother is speaking out after she says her 12-year-old daughter was denied a place on the heart transplant list at Cincinnati Children's Hospital because of her vaccination status.

Brayton and Jeneen Deal, who adopted Adaline from China, said she was born with two heart conditions that will now require a transplant.

When the Deals were in the process of adopting Adaline, the adoption agency told them to pick another child because "her heart was so bad, she wasn't going to make it," they wrote in a GoFundMe campaign.

"We continued to support Adaline so she could stay in a foster home, but shortly after we arrived home with our other adopted child, the agency stopped taking the funds out of our account," they wrote.

"So, we thought she had passed away."

Establishment of The White House Faith Office

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and to assist faith-based entities, community organizations, and houses of worship in their efforts to strengthen American families, promote work and self-sufficiency, and protect religious liberty, it is hereby ordered:

     Section 1.  Policy.  Faith-based entities, community organizations, and houses of worship have tremendous ability to serve individuals, families, and communities through means that are different from those of government and with capacity and effectiveness that often exceeds that of government.  These organizations lift people up, keep families strong, and solve problems at the local level.  The executive branch wants faith-based entities, community organizations, and houses of worship, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to compete on a level playing field for grants, contracts, programs, and other Federal funding opportunities.  The efforts of faith-based entities, community organizations, and houses of worship are essential to strengthening families and revitalizing communities, and the Federal Government welcomes opportunities to partner with such organizations through innovative, measurable, and outcome-driven initiatives.
The executive branch is committed to ensuring that all executive departments and agencies (agencies) honor and enforce the Constitution’s guarantee of religious liberty and to ending any form of religious discrimination by the Federal Government.

     Sec. 2.  Amendments to Executive Orders.  (a)  Executive Order 13198 of January 29, 2001 (Agency Responsibilities With Respect to Faith-Based and Community Initiatives); Executive Order 13279 of December 12, 2002 (Equal Protection of the Laws for Faith-Based and Community Organizations), as amended by Executive Order 13559 of November 17, 2010 (Fundamental Principles and Policymaking Criteria for Partnerships With Faith-Based and Other Neighborhood Organizations); Executive Order 13280 of December 12, 2002 (Responsibilities of the Department of Agriculture and the Agency for International Development With Respect to Faith-Based and Community Initiatives); Executive Order 13342 of June 1, 2004 (Responsibilities of the Departments of Commerce and Veterans Affairs and the Small Business Administration With Respect to Faith-Based and Community Initiatives); and Executive Order 13397 of March 7, 2006 (Responsibilities of the Department of Homeland Security With Respect to Faith-Based and Community Initiatives), are hereby amended by:
          (i)   substituting “White House Faith Office” for “White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives” or “White House OFBCI” each time it appears in those orders; and
          (ii)  substituting “Center for Faith” for “Center for Faith-based and Community Initiatives,” and “Centers for Faith” for “Centers for Faith-based and Community Initiatives” each time they appear in those orders.
          (b)  Executive Order 13279, as amended by Executive Order 13559, is further amended by striking section 2(h) and redesignating sections 2(i) and 2(j) as sections 2(h) and 2(i), respectively.
     
     Sec. 3.  Establishment of the White House Faith Office.  (a)  There is established within the Executive Office of the President (EOP) the White House Faith Office (Office).  The Office shall have lead responsibility in the executive branch to empower faith-based entities, community organizations, and houses of worship to serve families and communities.
(b)  The Office shall be housed in the Domestic Policy Council and headed by a Senior Advisor to the White House Faith Office, and supported by other positions as the President considers appropriate.  In carrying out this order, the Office shall work with the Domestic Policy Council, the Office of Public Liaison, and the Centers for Faith established by Executive Order 13198, Executive Order 13280, Executive Order 13342, and Executive Order 13397, as amended by section 2(a)(ii) of this order.

     Sec. 4.  White House Faith Office Functions.  (a)  To the extent permitted by law, the Office shall:
     (i)     from time to time, consult with and seek information from experts and various faith and community leaders identified by the White House Faith Office and other EOP components, including those from outside the Federal Government and those from State, local, and Tribal governments.  These experts and leaders shall be identified based on their expertise in a broad range of areas in which faith-based entities, community organizations, and houses of worship operate, including protecting women and children; strengthening marriage and family; lifting up individuals through work and self-sufficiency, defending religious liberty; combatting anti-Semitic, anti-Christian, and additional forms of anti-religious bias; promoting foster care and adoption programs in partnership with faith-based entities; providing wholesome and effective education; preventing and reducing crime and facilitating prisoner reentry; promoting recovery from substance use disorder; and fostering flourishing minds;
     (ii)    make recommendations to the President, through the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy, regarding changes to policies, programs, and practices, and aspects of my Administration’s policy agenda, that affect the ability of faith-based entities, community organizations, and houses of worship to serve families and communities;
     (iii)   convene meetings with representatives from the Centers for Faith and other representatives from across agencies as appropriate;
     (iv)    advise on the implementation throughout the Federal Government of those aspects of my Administration’s policy agenda aimed at enabling faith-based entities, community organizations, and houses of worship to better serve families and communities;
     (v)     showcase innovative initiatives by faith-based entities, community organizations, and houses of worship that serve and strengthen individuals, families, and communities throughout the United States;
     (vi)    coordinate with all agencies to implement training and education throughout the country for faith-based entity grantees to build their capacity to procure grants;
     (vii)   support agencies in developing and implementing training and education regarding religious liberty exceptions, accommodations, or exemptions;
     (viii)  consult with public and private businesses regarding their policies for employee volunteerism, charitable giving, and payroll deductions;
     (ix)    coordinate with agencies on identifying and promoting grant opportunities for non-profit faith-based entities, community organizations, and houses of worship, especially those inexperienced with public funding but that operate effective programs;
     (x)     work in collaboration with the Attorney General, or a designee of the Attorney General, to identify concerns raised by faith-based entities, community organizations, and houses of worship about any failures of the executive branch to enforce constitutional and Federal statutory protections for religious liberty; and
     (xi)    identify and propose means to reduce burdens on the free exercise of religion, including legislative, regulatory, and other barriers to the full and active participation of faith-based entities, community organizations, and houses of worship in government-funded or government-conducted activities and programs.
     (b)  Agencies shall, to the extent permitted by law, provide such information, support, and assistance to the Office as may assist the Office in fulfilling this order.  
     (c)  The Directors of each Center of Faith shall oversee their respective agency’s efforts to assist the Office in carrying out this order, and shall report on such efforts to agency leadership and the Office.  Agencies that lack a Center for Faith shall designate or appoint a Faith Liaison within the agency to oversee the agency’s efforts to assist the Office in carrying out this order and to report on such efforts to agency leadership and the Office.  All such agencies shall designate or appoint such a Faith Liaison within 90 days of the date of this order.

     Sec. 5.  Severability.  If any provision of this order, or the application of any provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid, the remainder of this order and the application of its provisions to any other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

     Sec. 6. General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
 
 
 
 
 
THE WHITE HOUSE,
    February 7, 2025.

Some US Adoptees Fear Stricter Immigration Policies, Mass Deportations

Thousands of Adoptees in US Still Lack Citizenship

 


The Trump administration’s focus on deporting immigrants has left many intercountry adoptees increasingly vulnerable. Brought to the United States by adoptive parents who, for various reasons, failed to secure their legal status or naturalized citizenship, these individuals now face the threat of deportation from the only home they have come to know.

For decades, intercountry adoptions approved by courts and government agencies did not automatically guarantee US citizenship. Not until the Child Citizenship Act of 2000 were intercountry adoptees granted automatic citizenship, but it only applied to adoptees younger than 18 as well as future adoptions when it took effect in 2001. It excluded those who arrived before February 27, 1983, as well as those brought to the United States on tourist or medical visas, a route that might have seemed fast and simple to some adoptive parents, but that has left their adopted children without legal status once those visas expired.

Many in the non-citizen adoptee community fear the impact of President Donald Trump’s talk about mass deportations and stricter immigrations policies, such as the executive order aimed at “removing promptly all aliens who enter or remain in violation of federal law.” Some of these adoptees have uncertain legal status due to visa overstays. Others, while legally in the US, remain subject to deportation if they have a criminal history, including for drug offenses like marijuana possession.

Job Title: Assistant Program Manager (Social Worker) – Adoption Programme - Bal Asha Trust

Job Title: Assistant Program Manager (Social Worker) – Adoption Programme
Location Districts: Mumbai. (Traveling required within MMR region)
Employment Type: Renewable fixed-term contract
About:
Bal Asha Trust is a Mumbai-based charity working for child protection for the past 39 years. Our vision is where every
child is cared for, loved, healthy and in the family. It is an awarded organisation implementing seven programmes for
vulnerable children. Our primary programmes are Children’s Home, Adoption Centre, Child Development Centre,
Education Sponsorship, Poshan, Mumkin and Training & Awareness. For more information visit www.balashatrust.org
About the Program:
Bal Asha Trust is India’s best and awarded recognized Adoption Agency. Bal Asha Trust is a licensed organisation
authorised by the Government of Maharashtra to place children who are legally declared “free for Adoption” with
loving and caring families. As an Adoption agency, we have two important roles to look after: placing our children in
Adoption and supporting local families in the counselling and home study process, so they can adopt from anywhere
in India.
The Adoption Programme is a structured process that ensures every child finds a loving and caring family. Prospective
adoptive parents are referred to the Trust through an online system managed by the Central Adoption Resource
Authority (CARA), New Delhi. The Adoption Committee, comprising a government official, follows a rigorous
screening and evaluation process before placing a child with a family.
Purpose of the Role
The Assistant Program Manager is expected to ensure a smooth transition of children from Bal Asha’s care to
family-based care through adoption. Execute all Pre & Post Adoption-related activities at Bal Asha Trust. The role
includes interconnected responsibilities for children’s adoption processes and guiding prospective adoptive parents
(PAPs).