Register Log in

Today, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer issued a formal apology on behalf of the UK Government for historical forced adoption practices in England, alongside a £4 million package of support for people affected.

The apology follows decades of campaigning by mothers, adoptees and other survivors, and comes just weeks after the Church of England apologised for its role in historical forced adoptions.

Responding, Adoption UK's Chief Executive, Emily Frith, said:

"Today's apology matters because it acknowledges a profound injustice that should never have happened. For decades, mothers were coerced into having their children taken for adoption, causing lifelong trauma for the women and adoptees who were separated, as well as for their wider families.

"But words alone are not enough. While today's investment in improved support is welcome, it is limited in scope and time. The Government now has a responsibility to match its apology with meaningful long-term action: a comprehensive programme of redress for everyone affected by historical forced adoption, alongside sustained investment in trauma-informed, lifelong support, and a commitment to continue to put the voice of adoptees at the centre of this discussion”.

The 19 defendants are accused of selling at least 34 babies between 2022 and 2025, some of whom were taken to Singapore and sold for thousands of dollars for each child.

 


JAKARTA/BANDUNG: Indonesian prosecutors are demanding prison sentences of between five and 10 years for members of an alleged syndicate accused of selling babies under the guise of adoption to couples in Indonesia and Singapore.

Eighteen women and one man are currently on trial at the Bandung City District Court accused of selling at least 34 babies between 2022 and 2025, some of whom were taken to Singapore and sold for thousands of dollars for each child.

The harshest sentence of 10 years was sought for five defendants including Lie Siu Luan - also known as Lily - whom prosecutors believe is the brains and ringleader behind the operation.

Wandisa Specialist Child Protection and Adoption Services, based in Somerset West, has described 23 June as “a dark day” following the announcement by its Dutch partner agency, Nederlandse Adoptie Stichting (NAS), that it will cease all intercountry adoption mediation by the end of 2028.

Wandisa and the NAS have worked closely together for 16 years, placing more than 50 South African children into Dutch homes. This forms part of over 200 intercountry adoptions Wandisa has facilitated into France, the Netherlands and the US, many benefiting children with special needs or those who have faced extraordinary trauma. “We know they are thriving,” Wandisa stated in the social media post in which they shared a letter received from NAS director Arnold Schouten.

The need is real

South Africa’s child protection crisis remains acute. According to a 2024 Department of Social Development (DSD) statement, adoption is “the most permanent placement option” for orphaned and vulnerable children, yet remains deeply under-utilised in the country.

As of March 2024, some 306 683 children were in foster placement. The DSD noted that many are orphaned as a result of violent crime, gender-based violence and HIV/Aids, while others have been abandoned due to poverty and unemployment, which give rise to unwanted pregnancy and other social ills.

Unlike Flanders, the French Community is not putting an end to intercountry adoptions. However, the procedure will be adjusted, placing greater emphasis on the needs of the child from now on. The responsible minister, Valerie Lescrenier (Les Engagés), announced this on Friday.


 

Earlier this year, the Flemish government agreed to phase out intercountry adoptions . The agreement came after persistent reports of problematic adoption cases. “It is time to close this chapter,” said the responsible minister, Caroline Gennez (Vooruit), at the time.

 

It is only a last resort

PUNE: A shared thread binds Sulakshana, Paul, Ratna and countless adoptees separated from their origins early in life: a quiet sense of difference, an unnameable absence, and an enduring quest to find their mothers.
Sulakshana was among the several inter-country adoptees who had filed applications with Central Adoption Resource Agency in 2025–26, seeking to trace their biological parents in different parts of India. Paul visited India in 1995 and Ratna in 2018 on their own. By the end of this year or early 2027, Sulakshana plans to visit India in search of her mother and her story.
 

 

TOI traced the trio and their stories that begin in fragments, shaped by circumstances and culminate in silence.
‘Your mother is India’

In the winter of 1999, after four daughters, hunger weighed heavier than affection in Sulakshana’s family in Nagpur, Maharashtra. At just five days old, she was left at an orphanage — her first severance from her roots. Two years later, she was adopted by a French family and taken continents away, growing up in a home that gave her comfort, but not answers.
Now 26 and training as a legal assistant, Sulakshana is preparing to uncover the story of Mira, the mother she never knew.

For Paul, now 62, the decision to give him up was made even before he was born in 1964. His mother, a nurse from Agra, had fallen in love across caste lines — a union unacceptable in her family. After his birth, he was taken to a Delhi orphanage and soon adopted by a French family working in Kashmir. He grew up in the French Alps, built a life in Europe, and raised a family of his own. But the absence lingered. Holding his newborn son at 30 stirred a turning point. “I had never known someone who was connected to me by birth,” he tells TOI.

Paul’s search brought him back to India in 1995, to a narrow lane in Lucknow guided only by sparse documents. There, he found traces — an uncle, a story, and a warning. Reaching out to his mother, he was told, could upend her new life. He returned to Europe without answers, carrying instead a quiet reconciliation. Today, he visits India often, speaking some Hindi, nurturing friendships, and holding on to a simple truth someone once told him: “Your mother is India.”

 

Journeys of identity

‘Why are you so brown?”

Ratna’s memories are even more fragile. Born in Calcutta in 1979, her earliest recollections are fleeting — a white building, a staircase, a sense of being moved. At 14 months old, she was placed in a children’s home and later adopted by a family in Constance, Germany. Her childhood was largely happy, but marked by a sharp awareness of difference. In her village, she was the only one who looked like her. “People would come to see me… ask, ‘Why are you so brown? It’s a strange feeling,” she tells TOI over the phone from Switzerland.

In her late 20s, the questions grew louder. Ratna returned to India in 2018, chasing fragments — hospital names, orphanage records — only to find that time had erased most traces. The orphanage had shut down decades earlier, its records lost. Her documents offer only a stark note: “Baby girl… abandoned… possibly illegitimate.” Her search remains unresolved, suspended between what little is known, and all that is missing.

Across these journeys, life abroad offered stability, sometimes joy — but never complete belonging. Many adoptees speak of living between identities, accepted yet apart, loved yet searching. Moments of difference — comments on skin tone, unanswered questions in schoolyards, the silence around origins — shaped their growing years.

‘Where do I come from?’

For Sulakshana, that search intensified recently. After a difficult period in 2023, she began reconnecting with her roots — through films, music, food and conversations with other adoptees online and social media groups. What began as curiosity soon revealed inconsistencies. Her birth certificate records her name as ‘Sulochana’, while orphanage documents call her Sulakshana.

With help from Indian authorities, she recently obtained long-withheld files. Those led her to a breakthrough — and more questions. A phone call with a man, believed to be her father, revealed a different story: an unwed mother, cast out of her village, battling distress, later dying of tuberculosis. Mira, from the Gond community, had passed away a decade ago.

“I believe my mother, consciously or not, helped me have a better life,” Sulakshana shares with TOI. There is no resentment — only a quiet need to understand.

Because for adoptees like her, Paul and Ratna, the search is not always about finding someone. Often, it is about making peace with absence, piecing together identity from fragments, and answering a simple, enduring question: Where do I come from?

Fiom and INEA will collaborate more closely on a number of projects to strengthen the international network surrounding search requests from internationally adoptees. This collaboration also takes place within the International Social Service (ISS) network, in which Fiom is active.

Division of Roles
In this collaboration, both organizations complement each other. Fiom is the central point of contact for internationally adoptees with an individual search request and conducts searches via the ISS network. INEA focuses on strengthening search opportunities in countries of origin and coordinates with Fiom regarding countries where an ISS partner is active, in order to ensure and improve alignment with existing structures.

Children adopted through Terre des Hommes in Switzerland were subjected to medical experiments. Now, female politicians want to know who was responsible. 


The Observer exposed questionable practices in early April : Adopted children from India, Korea, and other countries were subjected to medical tests in at least ten Swiss hospitals during the 1960s and 1970s. Upon arrival, they were systematically quarantined. The Observer was able to substantiate these cases with a wealth of documents.

During the same years, the aid organization Terre des Hommes Lausanne also brought a large number of children and young people with heart conditions from crisis regions such as Morocco and Algeria to Geneva. They subsequently underwent open-heart surgery at the Geneva University Hospital, a highly experimental procedure at the time: Several doctors – including the cardiac surgeon and professor Charles Hahn – were themselves members of the aid organization's board. Deaths occurred repeatedly during the operations; at times, almost half of the operations failed, as documents found by the Observer in the Lausanne State Archives reveal.

Edmond Kaiser, founder of Terre des Hommes, pictured on January 3, 1980, in Lausanne during his hunger strike to demand a ban on arms exports. (KEYSTONE/Str) SWITZERLAND TERRE DES HOMMES EDMOND KAISER

Edmond Kaiser founded the aid organization Terre des Hommes. He died in 2000.

Adoption folder

(Photo by Camille BAS-WOHLERT / AFP)

 

Norway’s final report on international adoptions has turned Costa Rica’s recent file review into a sharper official finding: Norwegian authorities did not do enough to understand how some Costa Rican children were declared abandoned before being sent abroad for adoption.

Costa Rica Videos

SC pulls up CARA for ‘obstructionist’ approach


NEW DELHI: After a 12-year-old girl lost her mother, her US-based maternal aunt and her husband adopted her by performing ‘Datta Homam’ rituals under Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act (HAMA). That was two years ago. They have since struggled to take their adopted daughter to the US because of conflict between inter-country adoption frameworks of the US and India, leading Supreme Court to frown on India’s Central Adoption Resource Agency (CARA) coming in the way of a better future for children who have been adopted by their close relatives based overseas.
The adoptive parents had completed the legal requirements for inter-country adoption of the child through a US govt agency but were told that a clearance in this regard would be needed from India’s CARA under Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act.
 

 

While the US authorities informed the adoptive parents that the approval for adoption was valid till July 28, 2026, they came to know that children adopted under HAMA would not be recognised by the US as the Indian adoption procedure is not considered legally safe under the ‘Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Cooperation in Respect of Intercountry Adoptions’.
On the other hand, in cases involving inter-country relocation of a child, CARA’s office memorandum does not allow adoption procedure under JJ Act and Adoption Regulations, 2022, if a child is adopted under HAMA. CARA thus rejected the adoptive parents’ application for approval of adoption under JJ Act.

The catch-22 situation being faced by the US-based couple was conveyed by advocates Noor Shegill and Anuja Pethia to a partial working-day bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Joymalya Bagchi. Shergill said, “The adoptive parents are caught in a bilateral deadlock from which no administrative remedy provides an exit. India will not process the case through JJ Act, and the US will not issue a Hague Adoption Certificate for a HAMA adoption.”
With the July-28 deadline drawing close, Shergill’s fervent pleas touched a chord as Justice Nagarathna came down heavily on CARA for not approving adoptions through HAMA. “This is all bureaucratic red tapism. If after inquiry the HAMA adoption is found to be in order, what is the problem in issuing no objection by CARA?” she wondered.

Justice Nagarathna recalled another case in which the father’s sister wanted to take motherless twins to the UK, but all obstacles were put in her way. “We had to ask your officer to be present in court. Why do you adopt such an obstructionist approach when close relatives are adopting a motherless child?” she asked.

“Why are you coming in the way of a child having a better future? Why are you taking a negative stand in the matter?” the bench asked and posted the matter for further hearing on July 14 with a directive: “In the meanwhile, requisite steps that are necessary for processing the application filed by petitioners shall be taken by the respondents without prejudice to their contention in this writ petition.”