Home  

[Planned Column] “Don’t Forget Who You Are” – My Life as an Overseas Adoptee

“Don’t Forget Who You Are” – My Life as an Intercountry Adoptee


Written by | Song Jong-geun (Overseas adoptee)

“Never forget who you are and where you come from.”

Just before I was sent to the orphanage, my grandfather left me with these words. They were short but profound. Those words became the only thread that held my identity together for the rest of my life.

I lost my father when I was three. My mother took care of me and my younger brother for a while, but eventually left us with my paternal grandfather. My mother later remarried and passed away soon after. My younger brother was adopted domestically, and unfortunately, he also passed away at a young age.

I had a relatively large amount of information about my family. Thanks to this, I was able to reconnect with my Korean family when I was eleven. Through letters and photos, I began to learn about my past little by little. I heard that both my parents were deaf, that I was a bit of a troublemaker, and that my grandfather wanted me to go to college. It must have been very difficult for my mother to raise her children alone in such a poor situation.

I am the eldest grandson, and my father and grandfather were both eldest grandsons.

However, there was a lot of manipulation in the adoption process. My family home was listed as 'Hanyang' on the adoption documents, but it was actually 'Jincheon'. The parent section was blank, but my parents' names were clearly on other documents. My resident registration number was also manipulated, but I was originally listed on the family register, and I know my real resident registration number because I inherited land from my grandfather.

The only thing that was true in the adoption papers was that the father was dead.

When I was in the orphanage, I didn't speak. I think my father's death was a big shock. I was bullied a lot, and I was pushed down the stairs and fell. Then one day, the orphanage told me to get in a white van. 'Why?' 'I don't want to get in.' I thought that, but before I knew it, I was on a plane, and my destination was the Netherlands.

When I arrived at the Dutch airport, unfamiliar faces that I had never seen before were waiting for me. Their appearance was scary and I did not want to go with them. I cried for hours at the airport and threw away the teddy bear they gave me as a gift. Most other adoptees were happy to see their new parents, but I was not.

Other adoptees have had similar experiences. One said that upon arrival, he ran to a pay phone and started dialing numbers to call his Korean mother. Another said that he held on to the railing of the airport stairs to keep himself from falling. We were all probably about the same age.

When I was five years old, I went to court. The judge asked me, “Do you want to continue living in the Netherlands?” It was probably a final confirmation of adoption. I thought to myself, “No… I don’t want to be here…,” but I reluctantly said, “Yes,” because I didn’t know what would happen.

Life after adoption was never easy. My adoptive parents were verbally and physically abusive to me. I was told, “You shouldn’t have been adopted,” “You ruined our lives,” and “I’m going to destroy you.” Racist comments were also common. I lost contact with them for years. I finally changed my last name in 2009.

Nevertheless, I thanked my adoptive parents. There were good times too. But they never once regretted or apologized. I already forgave them in my heart because I now understand why they did that. But if they sincerely apologized, I would sincerely forgive them.

In 2011, I first set foot on Korean soil again. From then on, I faced the Korean adoption system head-on.

I still do not trust the National Child Rights Commission (NCRC). This agency is violating the government's "Special Adoption Act." There is a regulation that requires the disclosure of birth family information when an adoptee has a genetic disease or the biological parents are dead, but the NCRC does not follow this. As in the case of Mathieu, Alice, and a Danish adoptee, they hide information even in life-threatening situations.

The disclosure rate is extremely low, and trust has long since been broken. After the MBC documentary in January, the NCRC announced that it would launch a criminal investigation into itself, but there is no sign of any real change.

The last Korean I remember was my grandfather's words.

“Don’t forget who you are.”

Those words still ring in my heart. And they will ring in the hearts of countless adoptees who, like me, are searching for their roots.

 


 

By Jonggeun Song (Korean Adoptee)

“Don’t forget who you are. Don’t forget where you came from.”

Just before I was sent to the orphanage, my grandfather said these words to me. They were brief, but they stayed with me all my life. That sentence became the only thread that kept my identity from unraveling.

My father passed away when I was three. My mother took care of my younger brother and me for a short while, but eventually entrusted us to our paternal grandfather. Later, she remarried and passed away not long after. My brother was adopted within Korea, but sadly, he also passed away at a young age.

Fortunately, I had quite a bit of information about my family, which made it easier to find them. Around the age of 11, I was able to reestablish contact with my Korean relatives. We exchanged letters and photos. Through them, I learned about my past. Both my parents were deaf. I had been a bit mischievous as a child. My grandfather had dreams of me going to university. But because of his poverty, and my mother's difficult situation as a single parent, raising me was not sustainable.

I am the eldest son. My father was also the eldest son, as was my grandfather. We carried that line.

But my adoption process was riddled with fraud. In my papers, my family origin (bon-gwan) was listed as “Hanyang” instead of the correct “Jincheon.” The names of my parents were left blank, even though they appeared on other pages of the adoption file. My social security number was falsified as well, but I knew my real one because I was registered in the original family register and even inherited land from my grandfather.

The only fact my adoption file got right was that my father had passed away.

At the orphanage, I didn't speak. Perhaps I was still in shock from the trauma of my father's death. I was bullied. I remember being pushed down the stairs. Then one day, without warning, they told me to get in a white van. I thought, “Why? I don’t want to go.” But before I realized what was happening, I was on a plane to the Netherlands.

When I arrived at the airport in the Netherlands, unfamiliar people with strange faces stood waiting for me. I felt scared. I didn't want to go with them. I stayed at the airport for hours, crying. I even threw away the teddy bear they brought for me. Other adoptees seemed happy to meet their new parents—but not me.

I've heard similar stories from fellow adoptees. One child, upon landing, ran to a payphone and started frantically dialing numbers—desperately trying to call his Korean mother. Another child held onto the stair railing and refused to let go. We were probably around the same age.

When I was five, I was taken to court. The judge asked me, “Do you want to stay in the Netherlands?” I suppose this was to confirm the adoption. I thought, “No. I don’t want to stay here.” But I didn't understand what was happening, so I hesitantly said “yes.”

Life after adoption was far from peaceful. My adoptive parents were abusive—both verbally and physically. They told me, “We should have never adopted you,” “You ruined our lives,” “I want to destroy you,” “I don’t care if you’re here.” They were also racist. For many years, I didn't speak to them. In 2009, I changed my last name.

Still, I expressed my gratitude to them for the good moments we shared. They never showed regret or said they were sorry. In my heart, I have forgiven them—because I've come to understand why they were the way they were. But if they ever say sorry, I will truly forgive them.

I returned to Korea in 2011. Since then, I've been confronting the truth about Korea's adoption system—and I no longer trust the Korea Central Adoption Resources (NCRC).

The NCRC is violating the very Special Adoption Law established by the Korean government. According to this law, if an adoptee has a genetic disease, or if a birth parent has passed away, the adoptee is entitled to receive information about their birth family. Yet in multiple cases—including Matthieu, Alice, and a Danish adoptee—NCRC refused to release the information.

The disclosure rate is extremely low. When NCRC withholds critical information even when lives are at stake, how can we trust them?

Following an MBC documentary that aired in January, NCRC announced on their website that they would initiate a "criminal investigation" into their own practices. But trust is not built by press releases.

The last Korean words I remember before being sent away were the ones my grandfather spoke to me:

“Don’t forget who you are.”

That voice still echoes within me. And I know it echoes within many other adoptees searching for their roots.

출처 : 대한매일신보(https://www.kmaeilsinbo.kr)

‘Baptism register entry alone won’t validate adoption’

Kochi: HC has emphasized that a mere entry as ‘adopted' in a baptism register or certificate does not confer the legal status of adoption, ruling that only a valid adoption made following the applicable Civil Law is recognized under Canon Law.

Justice A Badharudeen's ruling came while dismissing an appeal by Mary Joseph of Alappuzha and her adopted son John George, challenging a civil court order that declared the adoption invalid and denied John any legal rights to his deceased adoptive father's property.

Mary contended that she and her husband had adopted John from a Children's Home in 1989, with full inheritance rights as a biological child. However, after her husband's death, his siblings filed a suit claiming rights to the property.

Upon reviewing the adoption records, HC noted the district court, Kottayam, had only appointed Mary and her late husband as guardians of the minor boy and directed the Children's Home to hand over custody, without granting adoption.

HC, referring to Supreme Court precedents, reiterated that only an adoption compliant with Civil Law is recognized under Canon Law. HC further stated that to establish a valid adoption, there must be concrete evidence of the formal process, including the physical act of giving and receiving the child.

Subject: Adopted from China – unexpected DNA match after 27 years

My name is Saviëlle, I am 29 years old and come from Harderwijk. At the age of 2 I was adopted from China. On March 16th I received the incredible news that a DNA match was found with my biological parents. This came as a huge shock - it feels like the impossible has become reality.

Why I want to share this

I know that there are many adoptees in the Netherlands who, like me, never went looking because they thought it was impossible. But thanks to technological advances and the help of volunteers and organizations, much more is possible today.

With my story I hope to inspire other adoptees to give it a try if they have ever thought about it. Sometimes the chance of success is greater than you think.

I would really appreciate it if my story could be shared. If you are interested or know someone who can help with this, I would love to hear from you. Thank you in advance for your time!

Over 30,000 Indian parents are waiting for adoption: Centre

Minister of State for Women and Child Development, Savitri Thakur said at present, there are only 22 adoption orders pending at DM level across the country as per the CARINGS portal.


NEW DELHI: Over 30,000 Indian parents are waiting for adoption in the country, the centre informed the Rajya Sabha on Wednesday.

In a written reply, Minister of State for Women and Child Development, Savitri Thakur, said there are 32,856 In-Country Prospective Adoptive Parents (PAPs) and 859 Inter-Country Prospective Adoptive Parents (PAPs) waiting for adoption as per data on Child Adoption Resource Information and Guidance System (CARINGS) portal.

She said the WCD ministry is the nodal ministry for the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (JJ Act, 2015) which is the primary legislation for ensuring safety, security, dignity and wellbeing of children in need of care and protection.

The functionaries of the states and UTs implement the Act through institutions like State Adoption Resource Agencies, local Child Welfare Committees and District Child Protection Units (DCPUs).

Adoption fund to continue after families 'left in limbo'

A fund to provide therapy for adopted children will continue, the government has confirmed, after families criticised uncertainty over its future.

Families had been calling for clarity for months about the adoption and special guardian support fund, which expired on Monday.

Children and Families Minister Janet Daby recognised the delay had caused "a very difficult time" for many people but said £50m had been allocated for the fund for this year.

MPs welcomed the announcement, but said the delay had left families "in limbo", with some therapy stopped and services closed because of the hiatus.

Daby did not confirm when applications for the fund would reopen.

Statement of the International Social Service (ISS)1 at the occasion of the 45th ordinary session of the ACERWC in Lesotho

Based on its multi-layered work at individual casework and research levels as well as through its capacity building, technical assistance and evidence-based advocacy initiatives, ISS wishes to draw the ACERWC’s attention to the following issues that put children’s rights at risk in the African continent and beyond:

National child protection systems continue to require further strengthening through concrete capacity building initiatives and the development of technical resources that allow for harmonised, multisectoral and efficient approaches among child protection professionals. Through its work in Morocco, in collaboration with UNICEF Morocco and the Ministry of Solidarity, ISS is engaged in advancing the protection of children in vulnerable situations, whether they remain in their family environment or are placed in the child protection system through robust gatekeeping mechanisms, quality family-based alternative care options and family reintegration. However, ISS observes steadily decreasing budgets in child protection and prevailing obstacles to achieving sustainable change for children and families through effective prevention services and schemes. ISS work in Ivory Coast is an example of how to try to address root causes of child abandonment (2024 Study), advance on introducing specialised foster care and develop community-based solutions for families and children with disabilities.

INTERVIEWDanish lawmaker urges Denmark to address adoption scandal after Korean investigation

Both countries responsible for worst kind of human rights violation, says MP Katrine Daugaard

Katrine Daugaard, a member of Denmark’s Liberal Alliance Party, urged the Danish government to launch an impartial legal investigation into irregularities in past overseas adoptions from Korea, stressing that both the sending and receiving countries must take responsibility for misconduct in adoption practices.

"The work and probe results that the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) has made are super important. This is a call upon the Danish Parliament to investigate Danish authorities and adoption agencies," Daugaard told The Korea Times via email, Tuesday.

"I can’t say I was surprised by the results because I have read so many government files and case documents. It is very important for the people in both countries involved that the government takes responsibility for finding out the truth however dark it is," she added.

Her remarks follow March 26 announcement by the Korean commission on its initial investigation into overseas adoptions, which found government responsibility for human rights violations in intercountry adoptions from the 1960s to the 1990s. Of the 367 cases filed, Danish adoptees accounted for 227, or about 62 percent of the total.

It is a double violation that the government will deny adoptees full access to their own files.

Right now, key documents about international adoptions are about to be transferred to the National Archives, where access to the documents will be limited. This deprives adoptees of the right to full insight into their own cases.


This is a debate post. The post expresses the writer's own opinion.

In November 2023, the government launched a historical study to uncover the area of ​​adoption.

But the investigation will neither conclude whether the adoptions were illegal, nor reveal whether lack of supervision and knowledge on the Danish side has led to violations of Danish adoption law and the human rights of Danish citizens.

The latest revelations from India, as shown in DR's " The Great Adoption Theft ", and Lebanon from the podcast " Falske minder " have documented, among other things, that Danish supervisory authorities and adoption agencies have approved adoptions that were illegal. They have participated in this, knowing full well that the mediation cooperation with the sending countries was problematic and illegal. In addition, inquiries from biological parents have also been ignored.

Liberia: Gov’t Bans American Adoption Agency

— AFAA, Cradle of Hope Permanently from Conducting Adoptions in Liberia


The government, through the Ministry of Gender and Social Protection, has acted decisively against an American adoption agency for what it termed as serious criminal activities and mismanagement.

The Americans for African Adoptions (AFAA) and its affiliate, Cradle of Hope, an orphanage, are involved in serious child abuse and welfare violations as uncovered in a sweeping police investigation. The government has revoked the operation licenses of the orphanage and the adoption agency permanently. 

In a letter dated February 19, 2024, which contents are still concealed from the public, the Ministry of Gender, informed AFAA’s Country Director, Ms. Oretha James, that the adoption agency’s accreditation and sector clearance were being revoked for “widespread abuse and neglect” based on the report by the Liberia National Police.

“After a careful review of the investigative report from the Liberia National Police and legal opinions from within the Ministry’s legal arm, regarding the allegations of ‘Rape/Endangering the Welfare of Children involving Thirty (30) Children at Americans for African Adoption Orphanage,’ your accreditation and sector clearance are hereby revoked permanently in accordance with Article X, Subsection 15 of the Children Law of 2011,” Minister Gbeme Horace-Kollie wrote in her February 19, letter.

Korean TRC Acknowledges State Violence against Overseas Adoptees, but Limits Remain

South Korea’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission(TRC) has confirmed some of the overseas adoption cases from the 1970s and 1980s as human rights violations and recommended the Korean government to officially apologize to its victims. It is the first time for a government agency to recognize human rights violations in past overseas adoptions and acknowledge the state’s responsibility. 

The commission’s decision includes illegal donation practices exposed earlier by the Korea Center for Investigative Journalism(KCIJ)-Newstapa. Newstapa’s investigation shed light on how certain adoption agencies had increased the business profitability of overseas adoption by forcing donations from adoptive parents and had them as unofficial income sources. By forcing donations, Korean adoption agencies were able to take an amount of money that exceeded the standard adoption fee set per child.

The commission’s decision is significant as it officially acknowledges the human rights violations experienced by Korean-born overseas adoptees. However, the announcement immediately faced criticisms due to its limitations.

TRC’s findings of 2.5-year-investigation