Home  

WK: herdefiniëring rootsbeleid

WK: herdefiniëring rootsbeleid

donderdag, 24 januari 2013 16:11

Zoals al aangekondigd in het Wereldkinderenblad van december is Wereldkinderen bezig met een forse reorganisatie.

Teruglopende adopties en de financiële situatie maken dat er ingrijpende beslissingen zijn genomen. Een van de maatregelen is dat de rootswerkzaamheden van Wereldkinderen overgaan naar een andere organisatie. Wereldkinderen is in vergaande besprekingen met deze internationale organisatie, die onlangs subsidie heeft gekregen en die vanuit dezelfde visie en professionaliteit bezig is met zoekvragen. Wij verwachten u hierover in februari verder te berichten. Dan kunnen wij u ook per land informeren hoe de zoekvragen voor de diverse landen weer ingediend kunnen worden. Tot die tijd is het helaas niet mogelijk om nieuwe zoekvragen in behandeling te nemen.

Degenen die al een zoekvraag bij Wereldkinderen hebben ingediend, zullen persoonlijk geïnformeerd worden over het verloop van hun zoekvraag.

Pia wanting to contact Anjali. WK, Daksha's case etc.

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Arun Dohle <arun.dohle@gmx.de> wrote:I talked to Pia in the morning. She wants to set up a skype conversation with you Anjali on 11th December. So that the adoptees can direcly talk with you. I  m not happy with that as obviously I and ACT are going to be not so important….It´s clear for me, that Pia / triobla wants to establish her own connection with you. It´s our mistake, as we weren´t clear that everything has to go through ACT. It stems from the fact, that Pauline wanted to set up a separate search organisation. But that doesn´t seem to happen in the near future.So we need to discuss how to proceed with Triobla. Interestingly on Friday Pia also met Simone ( WK) on an adoption conference. Simone told her that it is difficult to be on both sides of the fence… So I don’t know how to proceed….do we want ACT in? or do we want to leave ACT out? Pia and Triobla are very influential. – but certainly they aren´t really critical.- they still promote ICA. – full hague system. Very delicate all this…I told her also clearly that we would need some support in Daksha´s case, as ACT doesn´t have sufficient funding left. Why should ACT ( specifically Roelie) pay the expenses of such cases??? When then organisations promoting ICA and Hague system- use this and our Indian contacts to make a search business???? While keeping ACT an arms lengths away? It is this kind of social workers who created that mess.We need to clean it up? While they continue to make their business? So shall I sent out below letter? Suggestions welcomed…..anyway Pia is now going on Thursday for 10 days holiday…hmmmm What to do?     Dear Pia, following our phone conversation, i m sending you the new CARA draft guidelines.Please go through them and you will see, that in future this will make searches for adoptees much more difficult.These part of the guidelines, comes in on initiative of the Wereldkinderen Partner orphanage Bal Anand ( Sulu Kalro). She is also head of the federation of maharashtrian agencies.None of the formal CARA committee members, was involved in the drafting process. All this happened informally behind closed doors.Wereldkinderen took the easy way out and continues to cooperate with Sulu. They are now conveying to the new CARA guidelines. At the same time- ACT took over the case of Daksha van Dijk. – a Wereldkinderen case.Her case is now pending on the Bombay High Court and reached a crucial state. The good thing is, that the orphanage doesn´t deny the existence of records. But of course they deny any  openness and further hide behind the “ privacy of the unwed mother” argument and clearly state that they will never disclose the identity. The case comes up for a major argument on 22nd October. It is crucial that Daksha ( she can take care of her own expenses) and myself would be there personally in order to take care of all things. Most likely it would make a big difference. A loss of this case, would clearly have huge implications for all adoptee´s who want to search. – certainly any High Court Order which clearly stipulates that the orphanages have to protect the privacy of the mothers, would make almost all searches next to impossible and would play the agencies and CARA in the hand with the new CARA guidelines. Any kind of success in Daksha´s case- may in the best case scenario, make it mandatory for the Indian orphanages to disclose the identity.Anything in between is also possible. But what clearly needs to be prevented, is that Daksha´s orphanage obtains an order which is 100 % in their favour.This will have then devastating consequences for all adoptees. Due to lot´s of case load, ACT currently doesn´t have enough funding for the work and travel expenses which need to be done. It´s very sad to witness how a missing few hundred Euro´s make the difference. Would it be possible for Triobla to support ACT in pursuing Daksha´s matter? Kindly let me know as soon as possible. Rgds  Arun DohleAgainst Child TraffickingMobile: + 49 178 5560872Web: http://againstchildtrafficking.org/Skype: arundohle

Mail Pauline to Maria Holz about possible EU Joint project

From: Hillen, Pauline [mailto:hillen@wereldkinderen.nl]

Sent: Mittwoch, 1. April 2009 15:28

To: Arun Dohle

Subject: Maria Holz

Called her, she wanted to meet, but first I sent her some of pur otutlines. But... I put some things out... just as a start!

ACT/AD Consultancy Agreement Wereldkinderen

Von: Arun Dohle [mailto:arun.dohle@gmx.de]

Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. Februar 2009 20:58

An: 'Hillen, Pauline'

Betreff: Consultancy Agreement

Hey Pauline,

Reisverslag India

Verkorte versie en Rootszaak Daksha en ontwikkeling na reis namelijk Rootsbijeenkomst tehuizen is al besproken op overleg 4 september 2008, zie blz. 14

REISVERSLAG REIS INDIA

Pauline Hillen

Medereizigers: Daksha van Dijk, Arun Dohle.

Bijlagen:

Unicef about Serbia, foster and children went to Sweden

Website copied on 1 October 2016, date of publishing unknown

. The parents visit these children and wait for better days to return, to take their children back home. “Before them, I used to have a boy and a girl who went for adoption in Sweden,” Andrijana says.

Milosevac, a Village Full of Family Warmth

© UNICEF Serbia

Foster Care in Serbia

29 November - 1 December 2023: Conference: The 'manufactured child' - What are the challenges for children’s rights, identity and origins?

We are pleased to confirm the participation of well-known researchers, authors and activists, including Audrey et Arthur Kermalvezen, Géraldine Mathieu, Michelle Cottier, David Smolin, Maud de Boer- Buquicchio; Karabo Ozah, Elizabeth Pangalangan, Olga Khazova, Nicolas Vulliemoz and many more.

Objectives: This event aims to hold  a proactive interdisciplinary dialogue between stakeholders (children who are now adults as a result of ART, professionals, parents who have recourse to ART, politicians, academia) that will meet to discuss children’s rights and the new ART techniques; to highlight good practices as well as the abuses that allow or compromise the respect of the rights of the children concerning both their identity and their family life; to deepen the scientific and legal knowledge in this field; to give concrete tools to the professionals who work with these children and their families.

Target audience: This conference is intended for political decision-makers and professionals working with and for children and young people (social workers, psychologists, teachers, doctors, mediators, lawyers, and any other professional concerned with children's issues), as well as representatives of the academic and scientific community.

Contact: colloque-enfance-hests@hevs.ch

Additional information at 13th International Conference | HES-SO Valais-Wallis (hevs.ch)

Julienne Mpemba Lubadi: spilfiguur in het Congolese adoptieschandaal

Julienne Mpemba Lubadi: spilfiguur in het Congolese adoptieschandaal

02/08/2019 om 03:00 door Pieter Huyberechts

Begonnen als “heldin”, maar toen rook ze geld: liet deze vrouw kinderen ontvoeren om te verkopen aan onwetende Belgische ouders?

Vermeende spilfiguur in de grootschalige adoptiefraude Julienne Mpemba (43). FOTO: ID

De Naamse Julienne Mpemba Lubadi (43) had tentakels tot in de hoogste Congolese regeringskringen en binnen de Franse Gemeenschap. Daardoor was ze jarenlang ongrijpbaar voor het gerecht. Tot bleek dat ze minstens vijf kindjes liet ontvoeren bij hun ouders en als weeskinderen verkocht aan onwetende Belgische ouders. “Ze is een op geld beluste meestermanipulator”, zeggen mensen die haar pad kruisten.

Test 7th April

Test