Home  

Heart-touching: Couple from US adopt orphan girl from Khammam

The Collector verified the details of the certificates presented by the couple and agreed to the adoption.

Khammam: A couple from the United States of America adopted an orphan girl from Khammam.

The couple Florian Hackl and Geena Kuriakose Athappily who learnt about the adoption process of children in India applied for adoption of a girl child through Central Child and Women Welfare Department at www.cara.nic.in.

They spoke to the district Collector VP Gautham on a video call. The Collector verified the details of the certificates presented by the couple and agreed to the adoption. He handed over the child to the couple on Thursday.

Speaking on the occasion, the Collector said that those who want to adopt a child should apply for formal adoption through the Women and Child Welfare Department legally by visiting www.cara.nic.in.

Never-ending quest: defining ethnic identity as son of adoptee

This article is the fourth in a series about intercountry adoptions. While over 160,000 Korean children have been adopted abroad since the 1950-53 Korean War, it is believed that many cases have infringed on relevant laws or violated children's right to know the truth about their filiation. The series will review such violations in transnational adoptions of Korean children and elsewhere, and discuss receiving countries' moves for their own investigations. This series is co-organized with Human Rights Beyond Borders. ― ED.

Adoptees' identity confusion passed down to their children

By Jiri Moonen

"Just tell them you are South Korean." That was the advice my mother gave me when, as a five-year-old child, I came home after being bullied at school by two Belgian boys.

Born to a white Belgian father and a mother who was born in Korea and adopted at the age of three in 1975 to a Belgian family, I vividly remember how the schoolmates repeatedly called me "Chinese" and made harassing faces. In addition to such events, slit-eye pulling, the words "ni hao" and "konichiwa" and making mocking kung fu noises would also occur throughout my life.

Yet what stays with me most of all is how this could affect me from a young age, although at the time I had no idea what racism was. After all, it seemed obvious that I shouldn't care too much about it all, as my mother pointed out, and besides, I had a Belgian father and she herself was adopted, so technically I was also "Belgian."

Ironically, I never felt fully Belgian, or Korean. Although it seemed natural from home to adopt Belgian norms, values, and cultural customs, I saw someone else every time I looked at my mother, my younger sister, or myself in the mirror. Nor did it help that I never came into contact with "Korean" things. It never went beyond the awareness that my mother was once adopted from the country and her roots were there. Therefore, it was very confusing when she advised me, "Just tell them you are South Korean." Because, what did this mean? Ever since that moment, my life seemed to become a journey to define this part of myself.

Growing up in the multicultural city of Antwerp, I met many peers who were immigrants. What always struck me was their connection to their roots. Not only the language they spoke or the food they ate, but the fact they could contact family members in their parents' homeland and went there on vacation really made me envious ― again, because I had a connection with my Belgian family, but not with my Korean family, as I didn't even know who these people were.

I tried to fill this void by doing things I deemed Asian and bringing out this image of myself as much as possible to my schoolmates. In fact, I was merely embracing existing Western stereotypes. Thus, I practiced jiu-jitsu and Muay Thai, referred to myself by the nicknames "Wong" and "Buddha" and worse, made the same jokes that the bullies had directed toward me. Of course, the connection to Korea remained largely missing and I hoped one day to find my mother's family again.

Only after high school did my view of my identity and international adoption change completely. After my parent's divorce, I started studying history. Throughout my college years, I began to learn more about Korea, which led to a trip to the country in September 2019 with a friend who was also interested. Besides getting in touch with the local culture, nature and people, which was an incredible experience for me, I also had a mission. I visited the orphanage in Busan where my mother had been according to her adoption documents.

There, the staff gave us new documents with a previously unseen photo of my mother as a child. Although this was not much, at the time it gave me hope of finding my family again, and slowly this also awakened my mother's interest. In the wake of the trip, we contacted various post-adoption services, my mother took a DNA test at the Korean Embassy in Belgium and made a profile on which her parents could search for her.

However, all these attempts turned out to be in vain.

Although my hope of finding my mother's parents remained alive somewhere (and still remains somewhere), my master's year provided a permanent shift in my perspective on all of it. After a successful undergraduate thesis, I decided to pursue a self-selected topic for my master's thesis: namely, the history of international adoption from South Korea to Flanders, Belgium.

Using interviews, I explored how adoptees experienced adoption and forming an ethnic identity throughout their life course. The combination of reading books and academic articles, the interviews, and my own personal reflections, made me realize the complex and problematic nature of international adoption. Thus, the romanticized image I had of family reunions blurred.

This involved political, as well as socioeconomic, and cultural elements. As Korea during the 1960s and 1970s, in the wake of the Korean War, sought to grow economically through industrialization, this led to urbanization and demographic growth in the cities. As a result, more out-of-wedlock childbirths occurred, which due to Confucian sociocultural principles would have no place in Korean society. One of the most obvious solutions appeared to be the pre-existing practice of adoption, in which ethnically mixed children moved to the U.S. in the first years after the war, and this afterward involved this group of unwanted children.

Under pressure from their parents, several mothers gave up children, often reluctantly, for adoption to several Western countries. Without making a value judgment about Korean culture, this shows the complex context in which adoption occurred. The idea that the majority of adopted children from Korea were orphans or foundlings is based on a myth to legitimize adoption. This makes family reunions a lot less obvious and brings me to doubt whether searching for my mother's family is a good idea. Indeed, any contact could bring back to light an unacknowledged or covered-up truth and disrupt family ties.

Nevertheless, the fact remains that this historical event has lasting consequences for the children who were adopted and ended up in unfamiliar countries, families, and cultures, where, like myself, they were confronted with racism and a sense of being "different" from the rest due to looking outwardly different. A feeling where belonging to no group is a common thread throughout their lives and the search for identity remains a constant challenge.

Therefore, it remains important to engage in dialogue with adoptees and their children about their own experiences and to create awareness of international adoption as a practice. Indeed, there are deeper roots beneath the superficial letting children fly over to Western countries, where adoptive parents feel they are "rescuing" these children from their misery.


Jiri Moonen is a file manager at the Belgian Federal Public Service Finance, and by training, is a historian with a special interest in (neo)-colonialism, the notion of ethnic identity and race. His master's thesis on the broader framework of Korean international adoption to Belgium will soon appear in the Belgian anthology "Beyond Transnational Adoption: A Critical and Multi-Voiced Dialogue."

 

Netherlands Intercountry Adoption Mediation Foundation (IAN) – Chairman of the Supervisory Board

Independent and socially involved

Non-Executive Board

GOVERNMENT

  • Reference:40918

The organisation

2023: Sad days for ‘adoptable’ children in Greece

The year is 2023: a major adoption scandal has unfolded in Hania, Crete. The adoption traffic may have been going on for the past 10 years? Ten years? How about 70 years? Adoption in and from Greece is celebrating a bizarre anniversary this year. Let me take you back to 1953, back 70 years ago.

 

1953: On the frontline

What significance does the date of 1953 bear for Greece? And why does an adoptions scandal in 2023 mark a sad anniversary? And a reminder of lack of action taken? Also, how does the 1953 date place Greece in the wider context of global twentieth-century history? This article discusses the historic adoption movement of postwar Greece, a movement that then-current terminology named “intercountry adoption,” but that today is referred to as international adoption and is associated with transcultural and/or transracial child placements. All these terms are somewhat unsatisfactory, if not misleading, given that the modern international child adoption flow is not one of multilaterism, or even bilateralism, but is usually conducted in a one-way direction that invalidates the “inter” or the “trans” of the lofty definitions.

The post-WWII adoption history of Greece, which remained underexplored for decades, was characterized by the same unilateral flows: some 4,000 Greek children left their country for adoption in the United States after 1950, and another 600 children left for adoption in the Netherlands. Small numbers of Greek adoptees were raised in other countries, such as Sweden, France, Switzerland, Cyprus, Canada or Australia. Greece ended its overseas adoption programs around 1975, but has since been a so-called receiving country. Is this news? For many, yes. It really shouldn’t be: Nikos Konstandaras (Kathimerini English Edition) wrote on this topic in 1996. Mary Theodoropoulou and Aigli Brouskou documented it in their publications. What is news is that nothing substantial has ever been done to redress the past of Greece’s adoption history of the 1950s and 1960s. With what kind of hope does that leave the victims of today’s scandal?

Brother and Sister Who Were Adopted as Babies Learn They’re Biologically Related: 'It’s Insane'

Frank, 22, and Victoria, 19, were adopted separately in the early 2000s, and only recently learned discovered they're biological siblings

A brother and sister who were adopted into the same family as babies recently discovered they are actually biological siblings.

Frank, 22, and Victoria, 19, were adopted separately by parents Angela and Dennis in the early 2000s, according to CBS affiliate WCBS and ABC affiliate WABC.
 

The siblings recently decided to learn more about their family history through DNA testing, only to make the shocking discovery, FOX affiliate WNYW reported.

"We were both found a year and a half apart and wound up in the same family," Frank said, per WNYW. "The odds are insane."

Opinion: The government should invest more in the recovery for adoptees

A national government that has acted negligently in intercountry adoptions must do more than prevent new abuses. For example, by supporting adoptees financially in their search for information.

I was born twice. I don't remember anything about my first trip through the birth canal, but I still vividly remember the second time. My sister and I were dressed up: we wore short white dresses with brown trim and black shoes with low heels. For example, we flew from Seoul to Amsterdam together with a number of other children. Overjoyed to be there, our new parents looked into our eyes and stroked our hair as they spoke softly to us. Although we had no idea what they said, we let them be, because even with a second birth you have little choice. As a child, your fate is in the hands of adults.

This was in 1979. In the years that followed I adapted as best I could, although my environment regularly reminded me that I came from somewhere else. In addition, I had not only arrived at Schiphol with my sister, but also with memories of the village and the house we lived in, the aunt who took care of us, our father who came to visit, the children's home in which we lived. All this raised questions, but since answers were not forthcoming, I kept them to myself for a long time.

As an adoptee, you miss out on a lot of information that most people take for granted because you can't tap into the collective memory of your biological family. Because your family in the Netherlands knows nothing about the culture from which you are cut off. Because you don't have the options to look for information or don't know where to start. Because your native language is gone from your memory and it takes years to learn it again.

For example, it was not until 2005 that I saw two pieces of paper with the names and dates of birth of my Korean parents and the context in which my adoption took place. At that moment, some of many missing puzzle pieces fell into place.

Minor girl given for adoption to late mom's neighbour raped, youth held

MUMBAI: Mira Road police have arrested an 18-year-old youth for allegedly raping his 17-year-old adopted niece. The girl who along with her younger brother and a cousin sister were given for adoption to their late mother's neighbour after they lost both their parents in a span of four months. The police have also booked three other members of the family.
The girl, a class 12th student, left her adopted home and approached the police on August 9. The teenager had lost her father to cardiac stroke in September last year. Her mother had died by suicide in January. The siblings were taken to their paternal grandparents' home in Kandivli. Within 10 days, the teenager and her cousin were moved to an orphanage in Andheri after approaching the Child Welfare Committee (CWC). The brother was sent to a residential school in Boisar. As the teenager was keen on pursuing her education, she approached the CWC to be given for adoption to a 54-year-old woman, who was her late mother's neighbour. The CWC officers visited the family, and the siblings were sent to stay with them in April.
 

 

In her complaint, the teenager stated about not being allowed to pursue their education and instead being forced to change their religion. They also accused the family of physically harassing them and making them do household chores. The teenager stated that when she protested against the torture, the family threatened to send them back to the orphanage.
She said the accused sexually abused her earlier this month, while others were asleep. She left home on August 8, spent the night out and approached the police the next day.

Battle for 2-year-old adopted when he was two days old; trial court directed to decide in 6 months

MUMBAI: In a case where a two-year-old boy is at the centre of a legal battle between adoptive parents, who have raised him since he was two-day-old, and his biological parents, the Bombay high court has directed a trial court to decide the matter within six months. There will be no extension of time, clarified Justice Sharmila Deshmukh in a judgment pronounced on Saturday.
There are multiple petitions surrounding the toddler, of which the HC has set aside two orders of the city civil court in Mumbai which had ruled against the adoptive parents. The orders set aside include one of March 2002, which rejected their adoption petition of 2021, and one of March this year, rejecting their review plea and directing them to hand over the child's custody to the biological parents on a plea by the natural parents. Till then, however, the child will continue to stay with the adoptive parents, who claim that the biological parents had given the newborn for adoption and have even executed deed of adoption on July 16, 2021.
 

 

The biological father objected saying they had signed "without reading, understanding" documents given by a woman associated with a non-governmental organisation (NGO) named AHAM Foundation. He said the infant was handed over to the woman and adoptive parents were not there. The biological parents said that during the Covid pandemic, they lost jobs and the mother decided to keep the child in an institution for some days or for adoption, but later, after discussing with families, they were willing to maintain the child and sought rejection of the adoption plea.
The adoptive parents said adoption took place through the NGO, and the child was given in adoption as the biological parents, in their 20s, were not married at the time and had consented to adoption through affidavits. They subsequently married. The trial court rejected the adoption plea on grounds of lack of registered adoption deed and lack of consent, and said "mere custody of child" not sufficient proof that the child was legally adopted.

The rejection of the two orders, however, does not mean any conclusion in favour of the adoptive parents, said the HC, as the trial court is now required to decide a suit filed last year by the adoptive parents seeking a declaration that the adoption was valid. The HC said section 15 of Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act (HAMA), "valid adoption cannot be cancelled and, as such, inquiry into the validity of adoption by leading evidence is necessitated". It also said the law does not require registration of adoption deeds.
But the HC said "inquiry contemplated under the provisions of HAMA as regards the actual giving and taking of the child in adoption... was not conducted" in the trial court and the intention has to be gathered from their conduct with evidence in a trial.

No HC relief to adoptive couple in war with biological parents

MUMBAI: Bombay HC recently declined relief to the adoptive parents of a one-year-old child who had sought its intervention so that they continue to keep him with them.
The couple and the child’s biological parents are battling each other over the boy’s custody in the city civil court. The couple had moved HC to direct the Centre to amend the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 (HAMA) “with respect to situations where custody is already handed over but consent is withdrawn”. They urged HC to issue norms in such cases to lower courts and pending framing of guidelines to direct the parties to maintain a status quo.
 

 

Justices Sanjay Gangapurwala and RM Laddha on September 20, though, said they “may seek appropriate relief before the court where proceedings are filed and pending”. The couple’s petition said they were desirous of a second child and wished to adopt. They had registered with the Central Adoption Resources Authority in November 2019 but there was no progress. In June 2021, they registered with NGO Aham Foundation. On July 16, 2021, its owner Julia Fernandes told them a newborn was up for adoption. While they were apprehensive about it, the child’s mother insisted on immediate adoption. After a small “give and take ceremony”, the adoption deed was executed with the biological parents and they were given custody of the child.
In September 2021, the couple filed an adoption petition under HAMA so they could submit the decree for Aadhar card and passport for the child. On March 16, 2022, the civil court dismissed their adoption petition holding adoption deed is not registered, and according to Section 16 of HAMA, “the court shall not presume that adoption is made in compliance with provisions of this Act”.

It further said as biological parents have objected to giving their child for adoption, “the adoption process can’t be completed without their consent”. In June 2022, the couple filed a review petition before the civil court and the biological parents filed for custody of their child.
The couple’s petition in HC said the adoption was complete when the adoption ceremony and signing of the adoption deed was done before a notary. Their advocate Aparna Vhatkar argued that therefore the adoption cannot be cancelled. The petition said the civil court erred in holding that the adoption deed is not registered as per HAMA as nowhere in section 16 it states that the adoption deed is required to be registered.

Advocates Edith and Mikhail Dey for the biological parents opposed the petition saying HAMA is not applicable as the biological mother is a Christian. The prospective adoptive parents and biological parents have to be Hindu to be governed by HAMA.

Mumbai baby selling racket: Accused women sent a pregnant teenager to Indonesia

Prime accused Julia Fernandes got her accomplice Huma Dalvi arrested on Sunday after she revealed her name to the police while saying that they sold six babies together.

 


A 29-year-old woman and her accomplice, who were arrested in a baby selling racket, told the police that they had sent a 19-year-old pregnant girl to Indonesia to a couple, who later may have adopted her child.

Prime accused Julia Fernandes got her accomplice Huma Dalvi arrested on Sunday after she revealed her name to the police while saying that they sold six babies together.

Dalvi told the police that she got a passport made for a 19-year-old girl a few months ago and sent her to Indonesia to work for a couple. “Dalvi said she was sent as a domestic help but the girl was probably two months pregnant. The couple, who had allegedly bought the girl’s child, took care of her and after her delivery adopted the baby legally,” said an officer from Wadala TT police station. The police are now probing if there are any other cases with international links.