Home  

83 orphans shifted from errant Rourkela home

83 orphans shifted from errant Rourkela home
TNN Aug 22, 2012, 11.05PM IST
Tags:
SOS|
Sishu Bhawan Mishra|

For Romania's Orphans, Adoption Is Still A Rarity

For Romania's Orphans, Adoption Is Still A Rarity by MEGHAN COLLINS SULLIVAN EnlargeThomas Coex/AFP/Getty Images A disabled and orphaned Romanian child in his bed at the Targu Jiu orphanage in southwestern Romania in 2009. Romania has, in general, improved conditions in orphanages that provoked outrage when they were exposed internationally nearly a quarter-century ago. However, some 70,000 kids are still in the care of the state. text size A A A August 19, 2012 First of two stories The 1989 overthrow and execution of Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceausescu provided the first glimpse of a country that had been mostly closed to the outside world — and many of the scenes were appalling. Among the most disturbing were images of tens of thousands of abandoned children suffering abuse and neglect in Romania's orphanages. Many were confined to cribs, wallowing in their own filth and facing mental health issues. There was outrage in the West. Foreign charities came in to help. Europeans and Americans adopted thousands of children. Nearly a quarter-century later, the fate of Romania's abandoned children is an unresolved issue. While the orphanages, in general, have improved, the number of children in state care — more than 70,000 — is nearly the same as it was in 1989. Many in the field say there are tens of thousands more on the streets who are not being counted. Romania remains a relatively poor country, and the legacy of Ceausescu's policies has not been completely erased. Complicated Laws Romania's adoption laws are complex and are seen as one of several reasons there are relatively few adoptions domestically. Annually, between 700 and 900 children are adopted of the 1,200 to 1,400 considered adoptable. Foreign adoptions, which were common during the 1990s, were halted a decade ago. EnlargeIsabel Ellsen/Corbis Under Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceaucescu, handicapped and orphaned children were neglected, unbathed and malnourished in orphanages throughout the country. This photo shows orphans at a state institution in Grandinari, Romania in 1989, the year Ceaucescu was overthrown and killed. A revision of Romania's adoption law, which went into effect in April, aims to make more children eligible for adoption and more quickly. But many involved in child protection doubt that the new law alone will significantly improve the lives of these abandoned kids. Bogdan Panait, head of Romania's Office for Adoptions, says he hopes the new law can bump the number of children considered adoptable to 2,000. But this number would still be less than 3 percent of the children in state care and less than 9 percent of those residing in non-family situations. "It's not a system for children's rights. It's a system for parents' rights," says Bogdan Simion, executive director of SERA Romania, a nonprofit foundation that is one of the largest financial contributors to Romania's child welfare system. Consider the case of Tatiana. She spent two years in a baby ward at a Romanian hospital because she had no birth certificate, her caregivers say. But the law states a birth certificate should be issued within 45 days, even if it means listing the mother and father as "unknown." In Romania, to be considered "adoptable," a child's biological parents must be deceased or indicate that they have no interest in having a relationship with the child. But beyond this, all relatives as distant as siblings of grandparents also must sign away rights to the child. The aim to reintegrate a child into his biological family, for better or worse, is considered the ultimate goal. Defining Relationships The biggest change in the new law is a child's eligibility for adoption should be considered after a year without a parental relationship. But what a "relationship" is, exactly, is unclear. How frequent must contact be to constitute a relationship? "As often as possible," says Ramona Popa, ROA's cabinet director. "It depends. There are possibilities because sometimes it is very hard for them to come." EnlargeSiumui Chan/AP Romanian orphanages were routinely overcrowded and children often lacked toys, as was the case at Bucharest's Number One Orphanage in 1991. A new law should make adoptions a bit easier. However, adoptions remain relatively rare. Many children now linger in the system because their mothers express interest by stopping by once a year. Mothers have the option of leaving their newborns at the hospital when they go home. They do not have to give up the rights to the child at this point –- or ever. Some kids are lucky enough to get moved into foster care, which is required prior to adoption eligibility. Others remain at the hospital until they are 2, and are then moved to orphanages. One foster mother living in Eastern Romania says she considers the two children she fosters her own. But she's unlikely to adopt them. She worries what would happen if she brought the idea up to the children's mother at this point. She's afraid the mother, an alcoholic and victim of domestic violence, would block the adoption and, possibly, take the kids back. "It's a hard situation because they are not legally adopted," says the foster mother's biological daughter, Cristina. "But they are so much a part of my family. But they are not legally abandoned and they are not adopted either." For Panait, there are many challenges. Any new approach not only requires the buy-in of a separate-but-intertwined child welfare system – but also relies on changing the minds of a people. "This is a first step," he says of the revised law. "We are trying, after we are finalizing this first step, to find a solution for all the children. And after we will try all the possibilities. Probably we will have to find other solutions." Ceausescu's Legacy Many of the problems today can still be traced back to Ceausescu. When he came to power in the mid-1960s, he aimed to create a race of Romanian worker bees. He instructed all women to have at least five children, and outlawed abortion and birth control. But many parents couldn't afford to feed and clothe families of seven or more, and children were abandoned in the thousands each year and the state orphanage system grew. Many thought the state would be able to do a better job of taking care of their kids than they could. And this mentality, especially among the poor, remains today. Most of those who apply to adopt children are couples who have been unable to have children on their own. Yet few Romanian couples are open to adopting children with disabilities or those of Roma descent. Meanwhile, studies by the U.S.-funded Bucharest Early Intervention Project and other groups show that mental, physical and emotional issues that result from living in a non-family setting, such as anxiety and attachment disorders, have a much better chance of reversal if the child moves into a family setting before they turn 2. But within the current structure, it's difficult to get children into the arms of a couple before this small window of opportunity slips away. Tatiana, the 2-year-old toddler left at a Romanian hospital, was lucky enough to form an attachment to a caregiver who took a special interest in her. "To get to adoptability you will need a period of 18 months, which is huge. For the child this is huge. For the small child it is huge," Simion says. "It touches the very soul of its brain development. So this has to stop." Meghan Collins Sullivan is a former supervising editor at NPR. Her reporting in Romania is supported in part by a Rosalynn Carter Fellowship for Mental Health Journalism.

.

Colombia has 2nd most adoptions in Latin America

Colombia has 2nd most adoptions in Latin America

After Haiti, Colombia has the highest amount of adoptions abroad from Latin American countries, reported Caracol Radio Thursday.

Allegedly, 60% of adoptions in Colombia have been sent to parents of other countries.

For congresswoman Angela Maria Robledo, this practice goes against the constitution and various international laws that prioritize children staying with families in their countries of origen.

"This is very serious, a country like Brazil that triples us in population sent 560 seven year-old minors, while Colombia sent 1,800," said Robledo.

The congresswoman also questioned the policy of the eight foster homes operating in Bogota, Cali and Medellin, that have taken a higher authority than the Family Welfare Institute (ICBF). Last year, Colombia allegedly gave up 3,400 kids for adoption.

The director of ICBF is cited for a debate of political control next week.

Notice – Processing is Suspended for Adoption Applications from South Africa

Notice – Processing is Suspended for Adoption Applications from South Africa

August 15, 2012 — Due to an investigation by South African authorities to review possible irregularities in intercountry adoptions, our visa office in Pretoria has suspended the processing of adoption applications.We understand that parents may be anxious to adopt from South Africa. Intercountry adoption procedures established by Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) are intended to protect both the child and prospective parents.Canada and South Africa are parties to the 1993 Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption which has established legal and procedural safeguards to ensure that intercountry adoptions take place in the best interests of the child and with respect to his or her fundamental rights.One of the requirements in all adoption cases is confirmation that the adoption is in accordance with the laws of both countries, in this case, South Africa and Canada. The visa office, therefore, cannot finalize any cases until South African authorities confirm that the adoption was in accordance with South Africa’s adoption laws.Updates will be posted on the CIC website when available.Parents who have already submitted an application to the visa office in Pretoria will be informed of the status of their application.We strongly recommend that prospective adoptive parents do not travel to South Africa until their adoption is finalized and all immigration or citizenship requirements have been met.

Nazgul Turdubekova: Foreign parents spend $30-60 thousand on Kyrgyz children adoption

Nazgul Turdubekova: Foreign parents spend $30-60 thousand on Kyrgyz children adoption

08/11-2012 12:06, Bishkek – 24.kg news agency , by Anastasia BERNGARD

ìForeign parents spend from $30 to 60 thousand on adoption of Kyrgyzstanís children,î Nazgul Turdubekova, Head of Children's Rights Advocates League Public Fund, told at 24.kg news agency today.

According to Turdubekova, nobody properly tracks fates of the adopted and taken abroad children. ìThere is not any state report on the issue. Therefore, to work in the country, it will be enough to accredit 5-6 foreign agencies, involved in international adoption. And when we learn to monitor, then we'll talk about increasing that number," Nazgul Turdubekova said.

"We want to remove the secrecy of adoption and submit to the Ministry of Justice the request of the Social Development Ministry on working out of Regulations on the accreditation of international adoption organizations, and set the required not less than 25 years working experience for foreign agencies," she added.

7.9.: Frankfurt School-Professor Bernd Lahno spricht zu „Auslandsadoptionen aus ethischer Sicht"

7.9 .: Frankfurt School Professor Bernd Lahno talks about "Foreign Adoptions from an Ethical Perspective"


Angelika Werner Corporate Communications Frankfurt School of Finance & Management Frankfurt / Berlin, 8th August 2012 The pros and cons of foreign adoptions are the subject of many debates. Now the association Eltern für Kinder e.V. (EfK) invites to a conference, where the different aspects of foreign adoptions are discussed. Professor Bernd Lahno, Professor of Philosophy and Quantitative Methods at the Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, talks about the ethical aspects of foreign adoptions. The conference will take place on Friday, September 7, 2012, starting at 10:30 am at the Frankfurt School of Finance and Management, Sonnemannstraße 9-11, 60314 Frankfurt am Main. EfK is the bearer of the oldest state-approved specialist office for international adoptions in Germany. He is celebrating his 25th anniversary this year.

The conference program of September 7:


- Wolfgang Weitzel, head of the Federal Central Office for Foreign Adoptions, summarizes the experiences from "10 Years Hague Adoption Agreement".
- Professor Bernd Lahno, Professor of Philosophy and Quantitative Methods at the Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, "Ethical Aspects of Foreign Options"
- Professor Manfred Köhnlein from the University of Education Schwäbisch Gmünd is talking about "Foreign Options in the Change of Times".
- Judith de Forrest-Wilson, who was born in Vietnam and adopted by a German couple, comments on concerns related to foreign adoptions: "No casualty of doubt".
- Somporn Poosala represents the Asian children's relief organization Friends For All Children (FFAC), an EfK partner organization. It presents experiences, expectations and assessments of the countries of origin. In addition, the guests can get in contact with information stands on foreign adoption options, offers for further care and the EfK relief projects with full-time and voluntary EfK employees. The event ends in the early afternoon. The detailed program is available at www.efk-adoptions.de/25-jahr-feier/programm/. For binding registration by e-mail: ebaus@arcor.de. Participation is free.

Professor Lahno is available for interviews. Contact: Miriam G. Wolf, Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, Tel. 069 154 008 290, m.wolf@fs.de
Characteristics of this press release:
Journalists, anyone Philosophy / Ethics, Politics nationwide Colorful science, research / knowledge transfer German

German:


7.9.: Frankfurt School-Professor Bernd Lahno spricht zu „Auslandsadoptionen aus ethischer Sicht"

Angelika Werner Unternehmenskommunikation
Frankfurt School of Finance & Management

Frankfurt am Main / Berlin, 8. August 2012

Das Für und Wider von Auslandsadoptionen ist Thema vieler Debatten. Jetzt lädt der Verein Eltern für Kinder e.V. (EfK) zu einer Tagung ein, bei der die unterschiedlichen Aspekte zu Auslandsadoptionen diskutiert werden. Professor Dr. Bernd Lahno, Professor für Philosophie und Quantitative Methoden an der Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, spricht dabei über die ethischen Aspekte von Auslandsadoptionen. Die Tagung findet statt am Freitag, 7. September 2012, ab 10:30 Uhr in der Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, Sonnemannstraße 9-11, 60314 Frankfurt am Main. 

EfK ist Träger der ältesten staatlich anerkannten Fachstelle für internationale Adoptionen in Deutschland. Er feiert in diesem Jahr sein 25 jährigen Jubiläums. 

Das Tagungsprogramm vom 7. September:

- Wolfgang Weitzel, Leiter der Bundeszentralstelle für Auslandsadoptionen, resümiert die Erfahrungen aus „10 Jahre Haager Adoptionsabkommen“. 
- Professor Dr. Bernd Lahno, Professor für Philosophie und Quantitative Methoden an der Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, „Ethische Aspekte von Auslandsoptionen“
- Professor Dr. Manfred Köhnlein von der Pädagogischen Hochschule Schwäbisch Gmünd geht auf „Auslandsoptionen im Wandel der Zeiten“ ein. 
- Judith de Forrest-Wilson, die in Vietnam geboren und von einem deutschen Ehepaar adoptiert wurde, nimmt zu Bedenken im Zusammenhang mit Auslandsadoptionen Stellung: „Kein Opfer des Zweifels“. 
- Somporn Poosala vertritt das asiatische Kinderhilfswerk Friends For All Children (FFAC), eine EfK-Partnerorganisation. Sie stellt Erfahrungen, Erwartungen und Einschätzungen der Herkunftsländer vor. 

Außerdem können die Gäste an Info-Ständen zu Auslandsadoptionen, Angeboten zur weitergehenden Betreuung und den EfK-Hilfsprojekten mit haupt- und ehrenamtlichen EfK-Mitarbeitern ins Gespräch kommen. Die Veranstaltung endet am frühen Nachmittag. Das ausführliche Programm steht auf www.efk-adoptionen.de/25-jahr-feier/programm/ bereit. Um verbindliche Anmeldung per Mail wird gebeten: ebaus@arcor.de. Die Teilnahme ist kostenfrei. 

Professor Lahno steht für Interviews zur Verfügung. Kontakt: Miriam G. Wolf, Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, Tel. 069 154 008 290, m.wolf@fs.de


Merkmale dieser Pressemitteilung: 
Journalisten, jedermann
Philosophie / Ethik, Politik
überregional
Buntes aus der Wissenschaft, Forschungs- / Wissenstransfer
Deutsch

Preet Mandir adoption racket: 3 accused file discharge pleas

Preet Mandir adoption racket: 3 accused file discharge pleas

‘the court is likely to pass an order on the discharge

AADITI JATHAR LAKADE

7 August 2012

The main accused in the adoption racket case, Joginder Singh Bhasin (72), his wife Mahinder (68) and son Gurpreet (43) have filed pleas before the CBI special court of D R Mahajan seeking discharge from the charges of running an illegal adoption racket at Preet Mandir.

Adopting from Africa, Saving the Children?

 

Adopting from Africa, Saving the Children?


Intercountry adoption exposes many shortcomings in domestic and international legislation.

ARTICLE | 6 AUGUST 2012 - 11:14AM | BY ELIZABETH WILLMOTT HARROP

The veneer of philanthropy regarding intercountry adoption is beginning to fade as issues are more broadly and better understood, and a dangerous connection to child trafficking becomes more prominent. It is worrying for Africa then that it has been dubbed the 'new frontier' for intercountry adoption by the African Child Policy Forum (ACPF). Despite global rates falling to a 15-year low, Africa has experienced with a threefold rise in intercountry adoption cases in the last eight years.

Demand outweighs supply with 50 prospective adoptersfor every available child, and between 2003 and 2011 more than 41,000 African children moved overseas. Ethiopia now ranks second only to China in the number of children that leave for intercountry adoption.

Not bereavement or abandonment but poverty

It is estimated that there are 58 million orphans on the continent. While the proportion of these adopted may be small, it is clear that the trends are significant enough for government officials from over 20 African countries to have convened at the Intercountry Adoption: Alternatives and Controversies of the ACPF Conference in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia in May 2012.

What is shocking is how these orphans are characterised. According to Save the Children, over 80% of children in orphanages around the world have a living parent and most are there because their parents cannot afford to feed, clothe and educate them. In Ghana, the figure is as high as 90%. In Ethiopia, the government recently attempted to trace the families of 385 children from 45 institutions; the families of all but 15 children were located.

When seen through this lens, the African orphan crisis is more of a crisis in family support. Poverty is not a reason to remove a child from his or her parent, yet this is exactly what is driving Africans to give up their children in what they perceive are temporary arrangements which will give their children stability and an education before returning home.

The "orphan creation" industry

There is no word for adoption in most African languages and the concept is greatly misunderstood. Many African family systems have traditionally favoured informal care of children by extended family or community with no legal basis for the arrangement. Adoption agencies are accused of profiting from this misconception as parents are persuaded to sign away their children.

This is exemplified by the situation in Ethiopia. It could soon become the leading sending country in the world as adoption agencies there are accused of soliciting children directly from families. Women are coerced into relinquishing their new-borns and according to Dutch NGO Against Child Trafficking (ACT) the adoption process in Ethiopia “is riddled by fraud and other criminal activities. Parents are stated dead when they are not, dates of birth are falsified, false information is provided to the courts”.

While Ethiopia has made progress in the past two years by placing 700,000 vulnerable children into alternative care such as community placements and domestic adoption, family reunification has still not been a priority and impoverished parents are coerced into giving up their children in what is dubbed an “orphan creation” industry.

A matter of money

The finances this industry commands shows why it is so hard to suppress. According to the Bureau of Consular Affairs in the United States, adoption service providers charged prospective parents up to $64,357 for processing an intercountry adoption in 2011. One UNICEF representative commented that running an orphanage in Ghana had been transformed into a lucrative 'business venture', beyond the realms of philanthropy. And in stark contrast is the amount of money needed to keep a mother and child together: it has been suggested that in Addis Ababa this would total $15 per month.

What is clear in international standards is that intercountry adoption is not mandatory and should be used only as a measure of last resort. This “principle of subsidiarity” protects the child’s right to cultural identity and means domestic family-based solutions should take precedence over international ones. So, while there may be some circumstances when intercountry adoption is in the best interests of the child, this can only be determined if and when all necessary steps have been taken to secure appropriate care in the child’s country of origin.

“Supporting families and communities so that they can look after their children themselves... pays enormous dividends,” according to Jasmine Whitbread, Chief Executive of Save the Children International, “not only are individual children more likely to thrive and go on to be better parents, they are more likely to contribute to their communities and to their country’s development.”

However, there are extreme cases where family reunification is simply not possible. One example is when preachers brand children as witches, as has happened in Nigeria, blaming them for adverse events. As a result these children suffer physical or psychological violence and are driven out, attacked or even killed. Intercountry adoption may be the best alternative for these types of risk.

Legislation lacking

While African states largely fail to deal with the issue of adoption in their national legislation, international child rights law contains explicit measures addressing it. The Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption (Hague Convention) lies at the forefront of international protection.

The UNICEF Office of Research notes that abuses occur more frequently in private adoptions. The Hague Convention prohibits independent or private adoptions and only allows “accredited bodies” to perform tasks relating to intercountry adoption. This can only be done on a non-profit basis. Worryingly, only 13 African countries have ratified the convention. And this creates something of a legal loophole that preserves the images of some countries at the expense of others – both France and the US allow independent adoptions from non-Hague countries even though they are themselves signatories of it. A parochial understanding of forced migration crimes will continue to prevent progress: the US does not count children trafficked through international adoption in its trafficking statistics which include only labour and sex trafficking.

Robust and comprehensive domestic legislation is crucially missing to link the provision of social protection measures with adoption law. With family protection measures in place, intercountry adoption should only be applied in exceptional cases, the need determined by the sending and not the receiving country, and only in accordance with the best interests of the child. Africa is currently failing its children in allowing intercountry adoption to take precedence over family reunification and family strengthening, and in allowing receiving countries to dictate the terms under which Africa’s children find the homes they deserve.

There is much to be done. As Benyam Dawit Mezmur, Vice-Chair of the African Committee of Experts on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, noted at the close of the ACPF conference: “Africa loves its children...this requires action.”

Think Africa Press welcomes inquiries regarding the republication of its articles. If you would like to republish this or any other article for re-print, syndication or educational purposes, please contact: editor@thinkafricapress.com

 

NGO Coalition: Social Development Minister arrest revealed unprecedented corruption in issues of international adoption

NGO Coalition: Social Development Minister arrest revealed unprecedented corruption in issues of international adoption

01/08-2012 08:18, Bishkek – 24.kg news agency , by Julia KOSTENKO

Social Development Minister arrest revealed unprecedented corruption in issues of international adoption. Coalition of Civic Initiatives for Social Security System Reform (NGO Coalition) published official letter on it.

NGO representatives accuse deputies’ intrusion to police work. 24.kg news agency had reported earlier that Social Development Minister Ravshan Sabirov was released in accordance with Bishkek City Court decision after deputies’ guarantees.

According the official letter corrupted schemes exist and were built in regulations and decrees as regulation’s inactions on foreign adoption organizations’ accreditation. “Corrupted connections between public officials responsible for children’s adoption have been revealed recently. In such circumstances citizens and public bodies should help police in the international adoption investigation. Instead, deputies are interfering to the investigation, influence on sentences and almost “replace” court’s decisions,” explained the Coalition members.