Home  

12-year-old Amy wants to go home to Ethiopia

12-year-old Amy wants to go home to Ethiopia

NaBr 08 June 2012 06:51

The 12-year-old Amy Steen, who was forcibly removed from her foster parents of Kortrijk municipality would rather return to Ethiopia than to stay in a residence that is the case right now. It says she Zealand.

"My greatest wish is to move back to Hanne and Ole (foster parents, Ed.). But it is probably impossible. This is about the municipality does not want to lose face. I would 100 percent rather go back to Ethiopia, but to be here, "Amy says Steen.

Also read: Municipality reported to the police for child violence

Govt bid to speed up child adoptions

Govt bid to speed up child adoptions

ANANYA SENGUPTA

New Delhi, June 7: The government is trying to simplify the process of adopting children so that it can be wrapped up in two to three months, officials said.

Adoptions now often take more than a year to complete, the red tape and delays scaring off many couples.

A committee formed by the women and child development ministry is drafting amendments to the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act to streamline adoption procedures, introduce time-bound approvals and mandate specialised centres in every district for adoption by foreign couples.

Gezinnen, geen kinderhuizen: tentoonstelling en rondetafel lezing in Europees Parlement

Gezinnen, geen kinderhuizen: tentoonstelling en rondetafel lezing in Europees Parlement

ingevoerd op 29-5-2012

Exhibition and Expert Roundtable on ending the harmful institutionalisation of children in Europe

Eurochild, Hopes & Homes for Children (HHC) and Absolute Return for Kids invite to an exhibition, vernissage and expert Round Table beginning of June in the European Parliament in Brussels.

Expert Roundtable: 6 June, 16:00 – 18:00, European Parliament, Brussels,  ASP A1E-1 followed by a:
Vernissage at ASP Ground Floor (outside the members’ restaurant), 6 June, 18:00 – 20:00
Exhibition: just outside the members’ restaurant, open between the 4–7 June 2012
This unique and powerful exhibition will highlight that for over a million children in Europe, the right to a family life is still not realised. Visitors will hear from young people themselves and from experts in child development and fundamental rights about the detrimental effects of institutionalisation, and the benefits of prevention and alternative care. In a Europe of rights, no child should have to grow up in and institution; with policy support and funding from the EU, they won’t have to.

Speakers at the roundtable include Dr Charles H. Zeanah, a leading global expert in early childhood development, and renowned children’s rights expert Dr Maria Herzog of the UN’s Committee for the Rights of the Child and president of Eurochild. We will then hear from the Commission and European Parliament Presidency at the vernissage which follows (speakers tbc). The whole event is hosted by Mairead McGuinness, MEP.       

Issued notice, Preet Mandir says it was following old norms

Issued notice, Preet Mandir says it was following old norms

Nisha Nambiar :  Wed Jun 06 2012, 01:31 hrs
Express impact Following Indian Express report, Women & Child Welfare dept demands answers

The state Women and Child Welfare Commissionerate has issued a showcause notice to the city-based adoption agency Preet Mandir following reports in The Indian Express that it was accepting ‘donations’ from parents. In its notice, the department has sought answers from the agency. The adoption agency, however, maintains that it was following old guidelines that allowed it to accept donations to raise funds.

The showcause notice, issued on May 29, states, “In respect of The Indian Express report which appeared on May 8, the Women and Child Welfare Comissionerate, Maharashtra state has issued a showcause notice to the agency. The agency on receipt of the notice should respond within four days. If it is not done, then it would be understood that as an agency you have nothing to say and we would be free to cancel your licence to operate as an adoption agency.’’

Deputy commissioner, women and child welfare (adoptions), Rahul More said no adoption agency should be accepting donations. “We issued the notice after its records were checked by the district women and child welfare officers. We have received the agency’s response and are yet to take a decision,’’ said More. The Central Adoption Resource Agency (CARA) does not permit any kind of donation.

Managing trustee of Preet Mandir D P Bhatia said they have replied to the notice. “We have received no notification from CARA on new guidelines. I have written to the district women and child welfare officer, commissionerate and to the minister that we were following the old guidelines, whereby we are allowed to raise funds considering our situation. We as an agency are surviving only on donations. We have a three-shift system to support the 40 children. We do not force any parent to donate money; it is by their own free will to support our endeavour. As we have the infrastructure, I have been requesting the government to allow us to re-start admissions so that we can keep the activity going. At present, we are also going to have new trustees as the old ones have resigned.’’

He added that the agency had 33 years of experience and needed to pay its staff up to Rs 2.5 lakh as salaries, which was raised through donations not only from adoptive parents but others as well. Asked whether they would give up the children to other agencies, he said that they have not yet thought about it.

The adoption agency, which had gained notoriety over alleged malpractices last year, was once again in the news for accepting donations. A CBI chargesheet notwithstanding, the agency, that has permission to give away only 40 children remaining at its Kalyaninagar unit for “in-country adoption”, was allegedly accepting donations from parents.

As per details available with The Indian Express, for 12 children who were to be placed under foster care, the agency charged the parents adoption cost as well as “donations”. CARA guidelines state that for in-country adoption, there is a Rs 1,000 registration fee, home study report and post-adoption follow-up charges of Rs 5,000, and Rs 40,000 as Child Care Corpus. The total payment to be made to the agency is Rs 46,000. Preet Mandir, however, charged donations (as the agency has labeled the entries in its books) ranging from Rs 17,000 to Rs 1 lakh apart from the adoption cost.

Minister of Women and Child Welfare, Varsha Gaikwad, had recently ordered that all divisions and district-level officers must check the functioning of adoption agencies.

Issued notice, Preet Mandir says it was following old norms

Issued notice, Preet Mandir says it was following old norms

Nisha Nambiar :  Wed Jun 06 2012, 01:31 hrs
Express impact Following Indian Express report, Women & Child Welfare dept demands answers

The state Women and Child Welfare Commissionerate has issued a showcause notice to the city-based adoption agency Preet Mandir following reports in The Indian Express that it was accepting ‘donations’ from parents. In its notice, the department has sought answers from the agency. The adoption agency, however, maintains that it was following old guidelines that allowed it to accept donations to raise funds.

The showcause notice, issued on May 29, states, “In respect of The Indian Express report which appeared on May 8, the Women and Child Welfare Comissionerate, Maharashtra state has issued a showcause notice to the agency. The agency on receipt of the notice should respond within four days. If it is not done, then it would be understood that as an agency you have nothing to say and we would be free to cancel your licence to operate as an adoption agency.’’

Deputy commissioner, women and child welfare (adoptions), Rahul More said no adoption agency should be accepting donations. “We issued the notice after its records were checked by the district women and child welfare officers. We have received the agency’s response and are yet to take a decision,’’ said More. The Central Adoption Resource Agency (CARA) does not permit any kind of donation.

Managing trustee of Preet Mandir D P Bhatia said they have replied to the notice. “We have received no notification from CARA on new guidelines. I have written to the district women and child welfare officer, commissionerate and to the minister that we were following the old guidelines, whereby we are allowed to raise funds considering our situation. We as an agency are surviving only on donations. We have a three-shift system to support the 40 children. We do not force any parent to donate money; it is by their own free will to support our endeavour. As we have the infrastructure, I have been requesting the government to allow us to re-start admissions so that we can keep the activity going. At present, we are also going to have new trustees as the old ones have resigned.’’

He added that the agency had 33 years of experience and needed to pay its staff up to Rs 2.5 lakh as salaries, which was raised through donations not only from adoptive parents but others as well. Asked whether they would give up the children to other agencies, he said that they have not yet thought about it.

The adoption agency, which had gained notoriety over alleged malpractices last year, was once again in the news for accepting donations. A CBI chargesheet notwithstanding, the agency, that has permission to give away only 40 children remaining at its Kalyaninagar unit for “in-country adoption”, was allegedly accepting donations from parents.

As per details available with The Indian Express, for 12 children who were to be placed under foster care, the agency charged the parents adoption cost as well as “donations”. CARA guidelines state that for in-country adoption, there is a Rs 1,000 registration fee, home study report and post-adoption follow-up charges of Rs 5,000, and Rs 40,000 as Child Care Corpus. The total payment to be made to the agency is Rs 46,000. Preet Mandir, however, charged donations (as the agency has labeled the entries in its books) ranging from Rs 17,000 to Rs 1 lakh apart from the adoption cost.

Minister of Women and Child Welfare, Varsha Gaikwad, had recently ordered that all divisions and district-level officers must check the functioning of adoption agencies.

EU told to do more to end child institutionalisation

Video

Though no reliable data exists, UNICEF estimates some 1.3 million orphaned or abandoned children in central and eastern Europe still live in institutions. 

For the most part, childcare remains the domain of national governments. Activists and MEPs say more EU funds and guidance from Brussels would go a long way to ending the inhumane conditions. 

Irish MEP Mairead McGuinness said: “Together, the member states, the European Parliament and the Commission can make a difference to people who are currently locked up behind the walls you see at this exhibition. We do have a lot of work to do. It is ambitious, but it is not an option. We have to do it.”

Presentation of the project: manager - Gabriela Coman

Prezentarea proiectului MMFPS „Îmbun?t??irea eficacit??ii organiza?ionale a sistemului de protec?ie a copilului” –

Gabriela Coman

, manager proiect, Funda?ia SERA Vizualizati prezentarea

Child removal results in violence accusations against council

Child removal results in violence accusations against council

Ray Weaver
    Child advocates say the council went too far when it forcibly removed a girl from a foster home  
In a screen grab from a video the Keller family provided to Politiken, 'Amy' is shown being forced into a vehicle against her will by council employees (Screenshot: Politiken)

The video is tough to look at.

A young girl fights and kicks while two adults, a man and a woman, forcibly remove her from a home while she screams and cries in fear. Two police officers stand and watch as the drama unfolds. The video (see it here) and a series of articles in Politiken newspaper have exposed the plight of 'Amy', who was forcibly removed from the foster home where she had been living and sent to an institutional home in Næstved. Many are saying that the child’s civil rights have been violated.

Børns Vilkår, a child service organisation, has reported the Næstved Council to the police, charging them with violence against Amy.

"We do not believe that the council has the legal right to forcibly remove Amy," Børns Vilkår's chairperson Peter Albæk told Politiken. “She had already been forcibly removed from one home, and now they have taken her from another.”

In 2009, Amy was adopted by a Danish family from her birthplace in Ethiopia. She was nine years old at the time - on paper, at least, though later physical exams indicated her real age might be a few years older. After the situation with Amy’s adoptive family went bad when she was eleven, including allegations of physical abuse, Amy was removed from the adoptive family's home and placed in a temporary foster home with Hanne and Ole Keller. The Kellers act as a so-called “acute family”, taking in children that are in critical situations.

Albæk said that decision to remove Amy from the Keller home has left the child isolated from the few adults that she trusts.

Although Amy had said numerous times that she wanted to stay with the Kellers, the council decided that she should be placed in an institutional residence with professional educators.

The video shows what happened when representatives from Næstved came to remove Amy from the foster home.

The Kellers told Politiken that they had repeatedly called the council asking for help in explaining to Amy why she would have to live elsewhere when she wanted to stay with them.

“I had to tell her I did not know why she had to leave because no one ever gave me an explanation,” Hanne Keller told Politiken. Keller said that Amy had endured traumatic events while in an Ethiopian orphanage and had become attached to the foster family.

The council says that it acted properly and in turn reported the Kellers to the police, saying that their behaviour was at least in part responsible for any trauma Amy experienced. The family may also face legal trouble for filming the removal and providing it to the media.

“We are obviously concerned that Børns Vilkår has reported us to the police," Næstved Council's child and culture director Per B Christensen told Politiken. “The police were present when the child was removed and I believe that the council was within its rights and used only the amount of force that was necessary.”

Christensen said that if the Kellers had worked with the council, it would not have been necessary to use force to remove Amy.

“We regret that the situation around Amy’s moving was so unpleasant, but there were adults, including the foster family, who should have taken more responsibility,” Christensen told Politiken.

Lisbeth Zornig, the head of Børnerådet, a children’s rights group, said that the type of action taken with Amy should only be used in the most serious situations.

Law professor Kirsten Ketscher from the University of Copenhagen told Politiken – without knowing the details of the case – that Næstved Council may have over stepped its bounds.

“You must not use physical violence against children. You must have a legal basis to exercise force against other people - including children," said Ketscher.

The social and integration minister, Karen Haekkerup (Socialdemokraterne), told Politiken that she wants an investigation into the actions taken by Næstved Council.