Home  

‘Rights activist’, priests in child trafficking ring

‘Rights activist’, priests in child trafficking ring

June 4th, 2010

June 3: The child trafficking racket run by a priest from his church in Padappai near Chennai, busted by the police recently, has turned out to be much larger than the cops initially believed.

A Krishnagiri police special team has picked up the woman head of a purported human rights group from Puducherry for being part of the trafficking ring and arrested a second priest, Selvam, who investigating officials say was in cahoots with racket mastermind Alphonse Xavier. Selvam runs a church in Villupuram district.

Investigators now believe that the sinister nexus between the priests and the human rights group could have been responsible for at least a dozen more cases of child abduction. The police also said investigations indicated that the child trafficking ring could have a Chennai link.

“We have arrested six people including two priests and three women in connection with cases of missing children in our district,” said a senior Krishnagiri police officer on Thursday. “We have also picked up a woman who claims to be the head of a self-styled human rights outfit.”

The trafficking ring was exposed after Ramakka, a woman from Hosur, lodged a complaint with the police about the abduction of her 3-month-old son on May 18. She said a woman who had befriended her had kidnapped the child from the Krishnagiri bus stand.

The cops zeroed in on the suspect, Danalakshmi, the next morning but she had already handed over the child to two women from Perambur. “We then traced the child in Perambur and arrested three people there,” the officer said. Dhanalakshmi confessed to have stolen a 3-year-old boy who was reported missing in December 2009 and said that the child had been handed over to a Alphonse Xavier for Rs 5000. Xavier and Selvam had sold the child to a family in Ginjee. “We arrested the priests and traced the boy, who was reunited with his parents last week,” the Krishnagiri officer said.

Meanwhile, state government officials, continuing their drive to identify unlicensed orphanages, on Wednesday rescued 17 children from an illegal home in Nagercoil.

No takers for kids with HIV, no adoption in 2008-’09

Adoption centres and foster care homes are finding it extremely difficult to place children living with HIV for adoption.

According to Madhuri Abhyankar, director, Society of Friends of Sassoon General hospital (SOFOSH), most adoption centres will have at least one or two children who have HIV. In 2008-09, the number of HIV positive children adopted was nil.

“We could place only one child for adoption a few years ago and that too in a family of doctors who were aware of the problems of the illness,” says Abhyankar. Like SOFOSH, other centres, like the Bharatiya Samaj Seva Kendra (BSSK), too find it a challenging task to place HIV positive children for adoption.

Says Roxanne Kalyanwala, executive director of BSSK, “at present, there is not a single HIV positive child among the 70 at our adoption centre. Couples who have been unable to conceive and finally decided to adopt want a normal healthy child. We have had a few children who had HIV. As they were not placed anywhere, we had to send them to Manavya — an NGO that runs a home for HIV children at Bhugaon.”

In 2008-09, a total of 299 children were adopted from eight institutions in the city. A total of 107 were from BSSK, 79 from SOFOSH, 38 from Preet Mandir, 36 from Renuka Mahajan Trust, 18 from Priyadarshini Shishu Gruha, 4 from Pandita Ramabai Mukti Mission and 17 from Sakar. A total of 54 children from these institutions were placed at homes abroad.

About René Hoksbergen

 

René Hoksbergen

 

René Hoksbergen studied social psychology at Amsterdam University and earned a Ph.D. on adult education . Employed at Utrecht University, senior professor since 1984. Visiting professor Institute of Psychology, Pune, India, 1998 till present  also on adoption. Between 1978-1982 he was personal advisor to the Minister of Education of India.

Emeritus professor, 2005, still working on contract basis at Utrecht University, director of the Adoption Department of the Faculty of Social Sciences. Main research projects:  History of adoption of children in Holland, motives of adoptive parents, attachment issues, evaluation of adoption of children from Thailand longitudinal study, causes of adoption failures, effects of neglect and abuse (Romanian adoptive children), foetal alcohol syndrome by adoptive Polish children.

He has written himself or together with colleagues about 30 books, and a large number of articles in scientific and other journals, in USA, Great Britain, Germany and France. He still gives lectures in many countries. Appears often for discussions concerning adoption issues on television, radio and others.

 

Adopting Alex

Adopting Alex

if you asked most parents to describe their experience of an international adoption, they’d probably respond with words like, “it was…complicated, convoluted, bureaucratic, frustrating…tedious.”

I’m probably not typical.

I would describe my experience of an international adoption from India as an adventure…an exotic foray into an ancient Asian culture.

Our story begins in ways similar to most couples that choose to adopt. We were infertile. After nine miscarriages, we made the decision to adopt a child from the country of my husband’s birth. My husband, George, is from Bangalore, in the southern part of India. Adoption from India seemed a natural choice to build our cross-cultural family. Unfortunately, adoption is a foreign concept in the Indian community and my 72-year-old mother-in-law was slow to offer encouragement.

Despite these sentiments, we forged ahead. By May of 1997, we began the long process of international adoption with Wide Horizons for Children, a 22-year-old adoption agency in Waltham, MA. Our caseworker, Homai Schmidt, was an Indian woman from New Delhi. Homai would coordinate the process of international adoption between an American couple, the orphanage in Pune, in the west of India, the Indian government and the INS.

Homai encouraged us to initiate adoption under The Hindu Adoption Act. The Hindu Adoption Act assisted non-resident Indians who lived outside the country in completing the adoption of an Indian baby. My husband was a non-resident Indian who was living in the U.S. and had recently acquired his green card. The time was ripe for an international adoption.

After the beginning, the process was very similar to most other international adoptions. We wrote our autobiographies, endured a lengthy home study complete with home inspections and family histories. We underwent thorough physical exams including an AIDS test and of course, we were fingerprinted by the FBI.

But that’s not what made an impression of me…my fingers, maybe, but not my heart.

George and I made the decision to travel to India and escort our child home. It was this journey that changed my life. After 9 months of endless paperwork, drafting affidavits of financial solvency and adequate health insurance, we received a referral for a 4 month-old baby boy named Amod. Amod is a Hindi name meaning precious.

Three months later, on May 11, 1999, we arrive in Pune, in the west of India near Bombay. We hail down an auto rickshaw, or three-wheeled motorized taxi, in the heart of this dusty city. Our auto rickshaw speeds down unpaved roads and swerves around sitting cows at the heart of every intersection. We dodged veiled women and servant girls wrapped in threadbare saris balancing bamboo baskets on their heads.

We arrive at SAFOOSH, the hospital and orphanage where our Amod was born three months earlier. Jyothi Rungi, Amod’s Hindu caseworker, meets us at the hospital entrance. Wrapped in a colorful silk sari and adorned with a red bindi on her forehead, Joythi escorts us to her office. We pour over Amod’s medical records in this tiny cement-walled office, painted a dull hospital green and poorly lit by blinking fluorescents. I hear a little cry and look up to see a thin, dark-faced nurse holding Amod at the door.

As my eyes settle on baby Amod for the first time, I experience an unexpected jolt of…panic! A series of disjointed thoughts swim through my head. He looks so frail…is he healthy? Why is his hair matted down on his head? Why is he so tiny? Why is he dressed in shorts that are too big for him? Why isn’t he smiling…doesn’t he like me?

After frantic conversations with the social worker and nurse, I am reassured that Amod is a normal and healthy baby boy who will just need time to settle into a comfortable routine with his new Mom and Dad.

In a whirlwind of papers and forms, Amod’s social worker takes us on a brief tour of the orphanage. We enter a long, tiled room with 50 cribs lined up on each side. A cluster of tiny nurses in white saris flutter between cribs changing and feeding the babies. This was where Amod had spent the first seven months of his life. Now, he’d be coming home with us!

We return to the office to learn about Amod’s birth parents. We see a picture of Amod’s birth mother with her parents. As a 17 year old girl attending university, Amod’s birth mother had become unexpectedly pregnant. She chose to put her baby up for adoption. At the age of 19, and with our permission, Amod will be able to see her picture.

Jyothi walks us thru a Hindu farewell ceremony. Spreading red henna along my parting hairline, she leads me, George and Amod in a circle for the blessing. As I soothe Amod, we’re packed into an auto richshaw at the hospital entrance and sent home to George’s cousin in Pune.

That first night with the baby was unsettling for us all. Amod cries constantly and refuses to be consoled. He has an ear infection and is running a low-grade fever. Infectious conditions were common in Indian orphanages, but completely treatable.

Early the next morning, we took a flight to Bangalore, in the south of India to meet with George’s mother, brothers, nieces and nephews. In a flurry of flowing silk saris, curried India meats and Darjeeling teas, baby Amod was embraced by loving relatives. A whirlwind of family visits, picture- taking and baptismal preparations began.

With the loving care and doting attention that only an Indian family can give, Amod was showered with gold jewelry, silk kurtaWelcome home (CUR-TA) pajamas and stuffed animals and rattles made only in India. We establish a daily routine of bathing Amod in a bucket in the tiled bathroom. Indians do not have bathtubs. They fill buckets for soaping and rinsing. His aunts begin to feed him milk, rice and dah. Dah is a lentil, high in protein and easy to swallow when cooked with milk and rice.

As our social worker predicted, Amod was not easily soothed during that first week. He needed a period of time to adjust to a white woman who speaks English. Even his Indian aunts speak Malayalam, a language of southern India and not Marathi, a western language spoken in the orphanage.

After Amod’s christening, we became frequent visitors to the Indian Embassy for review of our guardianship documents. After one week, we did get a passport for Amod to travel home to the U.S. Amod would become Alexander six months later when the adoption became final. We’d always call him Alex.

We boarded an international flight home. Although Amod was clinging to us and starting to smile, he slept fitfully in an infant crib. Twenty-two hours later, we landed in JFK. We arrived home in Connecticut at 4am. I paused at the doorstep with Amod in my arms while George snapped a “Welcome Home” picture.

We finally brought Alex home.

Sierra Leone parents seek answers in adoption case

Sierra Leone parents seek answers in adoption case

By CLARENCE ROY-MACAULAY and CARLEY PETESCH
The Associated Press
Thursday, June 3, 2010; 12:05 PM

 

FREETOWN, Sierra Leone -- Balia Kamara's mother sent her to a center in northern Sierra Leone so the 5-year-old could receive an education and food, and stay out of harm's way during the West African country's brutal civil war.

The mother visited Balia at the Help A Needy Child International center, known as HANCI, regularly for two years until 1998, when the children there were taken to Sierra Leone's capital for medical examinations. They never returned.

Dr. Phil Show Strikes Right Tone With Wrong Title

June 3, 2010. Dr. Phil Show Strikes Right Tone With Wrong Title. Hearing the title of Dr. Phil McGraw's show, "Adoption: Return to Sender" frankly terrified us. We were prepared for a sensationalized treatment of the Tennessee case which sparked the crisis in Russian adoption we still are dealing with. But the episode was actually very good. Dr. Phil kept viewers reminded that the failed or in crisis adoptions are a very small percentage of international adoptions. His families who were featured have all continued to work with their children to provide the best care that they can. And the experts consulted, including Tom Difilipo and Dr. Lisa Albers Prock, gave excellent advice. Tragically the truth is that there are no good answers for certain children, whether adopted or not, who have serious emotional and psychological problems. Once again, transparency and support, the two themes we have emphasizing in international adoption, remain the keys to a successful or at least manageable outcome. More Information.

Sierra Leone parents seek children adopted by Americans in late 1990s, saying no consent given

Sierra Leone parents seek children adopted by Americans in late 1990s, saying no consent given

 

Published June 03, 2010

| Associated Press

-->

Deputy Director-General of CCAA, Gan Weiwei, Met with Visitors from Ministry of Justice of the Netherlands

Deputy Director-General of CCAA, Gan Weiwei, Met with Visitors from Ministry of Justice of the Netherlands
 
Date of Release:June 03, 2010 ??Source:CCAA
 

On 3rd June, 2010, Deputy Director-General of the CCAA, Ms. Gan Weiwei, met at the CCAA with guests from the Ministry of Justice of the Netherlands, Director of Judicial Youth Policy, Mr. Reinier ter Kuile, and his colleagues, Mr. Jo?l van Andel and Mr. Jan Vroomans, as well as an official from the Dutch Embassy in Beijing, Mr. Remy. Director of the Archives Management Dept. at the CCAA, Mr. Liu Kangsheng, deputy director of the Eligibility Review Dept. for Foreign Adopters at the CCAA, Ms. Wang Xiaofeng, and deputy director of the Child Inter-Country Placement Dept. at the CCAA, Mr. Xu Zesheng, were present in the meeting.

 
 

The meeting parties made profound communications and discussions over the issues of influence of Dutch parliament change over revision of relevant adoption law, comments of Dutch organizations on the prolonged working time for on-line placement of children with special needs, physical status and age of children with special needs, identification of Chinese children available for inter-country adoption, root-search travel of Chinese children adopted by foreigners, key issues of Europe Adopt Conference of April, preparation for the Special Commission of the Hague Conference in June, classification of adoption cases made by Dutch citizens residing in China, and so forth. The two sides got to a common view over many issues and would love to give great mutual support.

The people present in the meeting have actually met during the visit of a CCAA delegation to the Netherlands in October 2009 and made discussions over certain issues already, which built up a very good foundation for this meeting. The two sides finally agreed that emails, telephones and letter should be used for timely communication of operational issues and, meanwhile, the mechanism of face-to-face meeting once every year should be carried on for a strengthened friendship and enhanced cooperation for inter-country adoption between China and the Netherlands.

 

http://www.china-ccaa.org/site/infocontent/XWDT_20100603105045263_en.htm

 

Russian Public Opinion Research Center VCIOM VTsIOM

VCIOM

-->-->-->

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scheidung hebt Adoption nicht automatisch auf

Scheidung hebt Adoption nicht automatisch auf

Köln (dpa/tmn) - Eine Scheidung ist kein genereller Grund dafür, eine Adoption aufzuheben. Das gelte selbst dann, wenn durch die Scheidung der Kontakt des Kindes zu seinem Adoptivelternteil beendet wird.

Das geht aus einem Urteil des Oberlandesgerichts (OLG) Köln hervor (Az.: 16 WX 227/08), wie die Familienanwälte des Deutschen Anwaltvereins in Berlin mitteilen. Eine Adoption werden nur dann aufgehoben, wenn es dem Kindeswohl dient.

Im verhandelten Fall trennten sich die leiblichen, nicht-verheirateten Eltern eines inzwischen zwölfjährigen Jungen schon vor seiner Geburt. 1999 wurde er vom Ehemann seiner Mutter adoptiert, ein Jahr später trennten sich die Eheleute. Die Mutter bekam das Sorgerecht für ihre zwei Kinder. Auf ihren Antrag hin hob das Amtsgericht Köln das Adoptionsverhältnis zwischen ihrem Sohn und dem Ex-Mann auf.

Das OLG bestätigte diese Entscheidung. Zwar stelle eine Scheidung der Eltern keinen ausreichenden Grund zur Aufhebung der Adoption dar. Allerdings müsse im Mittelpunkt der Entscheidung das Wohl des Kindes stehen. Das Verhältnis des Kindes zu seinem Stiefvater sei stark belastet und unter anderem durch Gewalt geprägt. Mit einer positiven Veränderung der Beziehung zwischen Adoptivsohn und -vater sei nicht zu rechnen, so die Richter.