Home  

Adoptions of foreign children by Americans drop to lowest level since 1995

Adoptions of foreign children by Americans drop to lowest level since 1995

David Crary, The Associated Press 
NEW YORK, N.Y. - The number of foreign children adopted by Americans fell by 13 per cent last year, reaching the lowest level since 1995 due in large part to a virtual halt to adoptions from Guatemala because of corruption problems.

China remained America's No. 1 source of adopted children, accounting for 3,401, according to figures released by the State Department on Monday for the 2010 fiscal year. Ethiopia was second, at 2,513, followed by Russia at 1,082 and South Korea at 863.

 

Guatemala was the No. 1 source country in 2008, with 4,123 adoptions by Americans. But the number sank to 756 for 2009 and to only 51 last year as the Central American country's fraud-riddled adoption industry was shut down while authorities drafted reforms.

The overall figures for 2010 showed 11,059 adoptions from abroad, down from 12,753 in 2009 and down more than 50 per cent from the all-time peak of 22,884 in 2004.

The last time there were fewer foreign adoptions to the U.S. was in 1995, when there were 9,679.

The latest figures did not include the more than 1,100 children airlifted from Haiti to the United States after the earthquake in January 2010. Most of those children were in the U.S. adoption pipeline, but the adoptions were not finalized by the end of the fiscal year.

The adoptions from Ethiopia were up by more than 200 from 2009, but adoptions from Russia fell by about 500.

Some pending adoptions from Russia were slowed after a Tennessee adoptive mother put a 7-year-old boy on a plane back to Moscow, unaccompanied by an adult, in April. As a result, U.S. officials agreed to a Russian demand to negotiate a new, binding agreement to cover adoptions between the two countries.

Organizations representing U.S. adoption agencies have called on the U.S. government to be more active in trying to reverse the decline in international adoptions. However, the State Department says any such efforts must be accompanied by initiatives to provide better options for orphans in their home countries, including support for birth parents and foster care.

"Not every child is going to be eligible for international adoption," said Susan Jacobs, the State Department's special adviser on children's issues. "The first thing we need to do is protect children in their own countries."

The State Department also reported that 43 American children were adopted by residents of foreign countries last year - 19 of them went to Canada and 18 to the Netherlands.

Poinsette: Adopting Third World children is voluntary colonization

Poinsette: Adopting Third World children is voluntary colonization

Freelance commentary

Bruce Poinsette | Freelance columnist

Published: Monday, January 31, 2011

Updated: Monday, January 31, 2011 01:01

Half a life: Abandoned, adopted, abandoned

Manisha (name changed) is 15 and brighteyed . She might be the regular teenager . The adults in contact with her say she is

polite and disciplined and is always ready to help anyone in trouble. But Manisha is not a regular teenager and hers is no

ordinary story. She lives in a home run by an NGO in Gurgaon for abandoned or abused children or those with special needs.

She is the helpless victim of inter-country adoption gone terribly wrong.

Six years ago, Manisha was adopted by an American family from a centre in Mumbai. But soon enough, they were unwilling to

Painful affairs of child adoption in Nepal

Anil Giri – AHN News Correspondent
Feature Story, Nepal (AHN) – Last September, American couple Haydn Hilling and his wife Edvige desperately wanted to take home their adopted Nepali child, Kailash. Though the American couple that hails from Louisiana spent more than one-and-a-half years getting the necessary paperwork required for the adoption, the process has come to a standstill following the United States’ decision to halt adoptions of abandoned children from Nepal.
The U.S. administration halted the adoption of Nepali children due to growing allegations of child trafficking and falsification of documents, often in connivance with government authorities.
A joint statement issued by the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services in the first week of August said the step was taken to protect the rights and interests of Nepali children and their families after field visits to orphanages and police departments showed that documents describing children up for adoption as abandoned were often unreliable.
Another 10 countries–Canada, Denmark, Germany, France, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, Spain, Italy, and the United Kingdom–have also halted inter-country adoptions from Nepal.
According to Nepal’s Ministry of Women, Children and Social Welfare, new rules were put in place last December and some stern measures have been added to the process.
“The Hague Secretariat also wants the smooth resumption of child adoption here,” chief of the ministry’s legal section, Sher Jung Karki said. The new set of policies allows local placement agencies to charge US$5,000 to adopting parents, while the government charges US$3,000.
Any foreign placement agency must set up a liaison office in Nepal and pay the government US$10,000 that will be handed over to an organization working for the welfare of children. Subsequently, the process of inter-country adoption of street children is subject to widespread abuses, the government has banned the adoption effective from Jan. 5.
The new policy also allows Nobel laureates, heads of states/governments, foreign ministers, celebrities, or a couple with an annual income of over US$300,000 to become foster parents, while others cannot.
Largely, a vulnerable adoption process that had been taking place in Nepal since several years has compelled the US government more alerted and posed a ban. That was the reason that they could not adopted two – year – old Kailash which made them running from pillar to post that their call will be heard.
Now the list is long. As many as 56 American families are facing heartbreak due to the US Government decision to ban child adoption from Nepal until Nepal’s legal provision ensures that adopted children were not fraud and claim genuine.
These desperate 56 parents have instituted an alliance and had registered a petition in US Congress. “We respectfully request that the Right Honorable members of the US Senate and House petition the Department of State and USCIS within the Department of Homeland Security to assist the “Nepal Pipeline families” in obtaining visas to bring their children home immediately,” the petition reads.
In response to the petition, 14,398 letters and emails were sent far to support their campaign. Moreover they have internet campaign through blog, http://theywaitnepal.blogspot.com/. One can find the photos of to be adopted Nepali child and their US mother. “These families are struggling to bring home their legally adopted children who are stuck in Nepal awaiting visas that will allow them to enter the US,” they write in their blog.
Many anxious parents are waiting in the US also. Many are stranded since August, 2010.
It seems that child adoption in Nepal has been turned into a profitable business as dozens of websites and privately organizations have claimed that there were many advantages of adopting children from Nepal. “There are many advantages for adopting from Nepal. Even though Nepal is an economically poor country, children are cared for very well with few incidences of abuse or neglect. If you like the idea of adopting a baby or toddler, it would be an excellent country to consider,” claims, adoptionark.
Article © AHN – All Rights Reserved

American to apologize for ill-treating Russian adopted son

American to apologize for ill-treating Russian adopted son
Tags: News, Society, child abuse, Jessica Bigley, child adoption, World,
Russia, Daniil Bukharov, Pavel Astakhov


Jan 29, 2011 18:01 Moscow Time
Pavel Astakhov. Photo: RIA Novosti

Print   Email   Add to blog

American Jessica Bigley, who is accused of cruelty against her adopted
Russian son, intends to come to Russia with her husband and apologize
publically, Russian Children’s Ombudsman Pavel Astakhov says.

Last autumn, an American TV channel showed a video record where Jessica
makes the boy drink piquant sauce and pours cold water on him.

She explained that by this, she tried to make him obedient.

After this TV program, a criminal case was instituted against Jessica
Bigely.

Judith Kilshaw: Internet adoption scandal woman now wants IVF at 57!

Judith Kilshaw: Internet adoption scandal woman now wants IVF at 57!

Categories: Latest news

Judith KilshawWho could forget the Kilshaws? Solicitor husband Alan and his wife Judith, who, in 2001 BOUGHT mixed race twins from a 'baby broker' in the US for £8,200, and then went on the run from UK social services.

The babies were eventually returned to the US, where a judge branded the Kilshaws 'media obsessed' and with no interest in the children's welfare.

A decade on, and Judith Kilshaw is back in the news. Having divorced husband Alan, she has gone on to marry her toy-boy lover, Steven Sillett, 13 years her junior. And now she wants to 'cement' their relationship with a baby.

Speaking to the Daily Mail - and bizarrely pictured with her new husband AND her ex - Judith reveals she wants to go to Italy to undergo IVF.

Alan, Judith says is still very much part of her life. 'We're all here together. It's an absolutely unique situation', she says. Indeed - for it was Alan who gave her away at her wedding to Steve, and together they are claiming damages from Flintshire County Council over what they brand the 'unlawful' removal of their adopted daughters.

Following the case, Alan - then a solicitor - was struck off by The Law Society. The couple claim the furore led to the breakdown of their marriage and had a detrimental affect on their health.

'I want £1million for me and the same for Alan,' Judith tells the Mail, also revealing she does not 'miss' the twin girls she had to give up, saying simply 'time has moved on' and 'there's no point in missing them'.

Of her IVF plans Judith says: 'It's getting later and later. I think it would be nice to cement our relationship.'

Court ruling could mean equal adoption rights for gay couples

Photo: DPA

Court ruling could mean equal adoption rights for gay couples

Published: 28 Jan 11 11:38 CET

Gay couples in Germany are not allowed to adopt children together – only one partner goes on the papers. But a higher regional court ruling that deemed the law unconstitutional this week may change this.

While homosexual couples are allowed to adopt their partner’s own biological children thanks to a Constitutional Court ruling in the summer of 2009, the same rule does not apply to non-biological adopted children. 

But the Hamburg upper regional court (OLG) called this “unequal treatment of marriage and civil unions in current adoption law” that is neither constitutional nor in the child’s best interest, broadcaster NDR reported. 

Straight couples face no restrictions when it comes to adopting non-biological children together.

The ruling, published this week after it was decided on December 22, 2010, found that the inheritance and maintenance claim rights gained through adoption by both parents provide additional safeguards for children, the broadcaster said. 

The issue has been sent off to the country’s high court for review, but so far no date has been set, a court spokesperson said. 

Meanwhile politicians from the environmentalist Green party called for the government to quickly write a new draft law to ensure equal adoption rights for gay couples.

Parliamentarian and Green party spokesperson for human rights issues Volker Beck told NDR that Justice Minister Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger must “finally” make a change that “ends the discrimination of homosexual parents and their children.”

The failure to do this puts children from such families at a disadvantage, he said.

“The adoption ban for gay and lesbian couples endangers child welfare and must therefore be ended,” said Beck, who is also the party’s chief whip. 

The Local/ka

 

What do you think? Leave your comment below.

“We don’t know all cases of Russian child abuse abroad” - Ombudsman

“We don’t know all cases of Russian child abuse abroad” - Ombudsman

 
Jan 28, 2011 15:14 Moscow Time
Download
Pavel Astakhov. Photo: RIA Novosti
Print Email Add to blog

Russia's Children's Rights Ombudsman Pavel Astakhov has called for a halt to adoptions of this country's children by foreign families until bilateral agreements to regulate adoptions are signed.

Without such bilateral agreements Russia is unable to lok after the Russian children adopted by foreigners and protect them from abuse.

Russia and the US have a 16-year history of international adoption and during this time more than 600,000 Russian children have found a new family in the US.  However the cases of abuse and mistreatment of Russian children in the US adoptive families has become a regular thing. 

The last scandal, which added fuel to the legal disputes, was the case of 7-year old Daniil Boukharov. Adopted by Gary and Jessica Bigley, the boy was forced to drink Tabasco sauce as a disciplinary measure. And this is not the most terrifying story, Astakhov says.

In the US 17 children have been killed by their adoptive parents. The law of large numbers can’t be applied here with 600,000 being adopted and only several killed. No! The US ambassador in Russia John Beyrle said that even one case is more than enough for Russia to act the way it is acting now. I agree with him. We do not have such problems with other countries, only with the US.  Moreover, we do not know about all the cases. We have learned there is a ranch where adopted Russian children rejected by their US parents are sent to. And nobody tells us about it. That’s a fact – we do not know what is going on with more than 400 children because the primary adoption was cancelled and after that the child “got lost”.

As at now, only Ireland has officially refused to sign a bilateral agreement on child adoption with Russia and adopt Russian children. France, Great Britain, Finland and Spain are ready to sign such agreements.  But until the agreements are signed, it is necessary to halt the adoption and make the State Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, introduce amendments to the Russian Family Code, Pavel Astakhov says.

Today it is necessary to add new provisions to the Family Code to stipulate that only children who were not adopted in Russia may be put up for international adoption. But this should be predicated on the relevant bilateral agreement being in place.

The Children’s rights ombudsman admits that it is impossible to now ban the international adoption of Russian children. Though the law provides  for such an option there is a powerful international lobby, making big money on protecting international adoption, which is a very profitable business. For example in the US, the services for finding an adopted child in Russia costs between $ 50,000 and $70,000.

??? ????????

Appearance on Dr. Phil show leads to child abuse charge against Alaska woman

Appearance on Dr. Phil show leads to child abuse charge against Alaska woman

By The Associated Press (CP) – 1 hour ago

ANCHORAGE, Alaska — An Anchorage woman is charged with child abuse because of a "Dr.Phil" TV show appearance in which the audience saw video of her disciplining a 7-year-old son by putting hot sauce in his mouth and forcing him into a cold shower.

The methods chosen by Jessica Beagley were unreasonable, said municipal prosecutor Cynthia Franklin.

The lawyer for the 36-year-old mother said the city is intruding into a family matter.

"She has not done anything that would warrant a criminal charge for child abuse," said attorney William Ingaldson. "If this hadn't showed up on 'Dr. Phil,' there wouldn't be anybody saying anything about it."

Beagley is pleading not guilty at Friday's arraignment, he said.

"Some people think spanking your child is wrong, and she doesn't even do that," Ingaldson said.

Neither the child in the video nor five other children in the home have been removed by the Office of Children's Services, the Anchorage Daily News reported Friday.

Beagley's husband, Gary Beagley, is an Anchorage police officer. He's not under investigation, said the department spokesman, Lt. Dave Parker.

"Ultimately, a jury will have to decide if that's the case," Parker said.

In the video, Beagley is punishing the boy for "pulling three cards," a reference to three reports from his school of bad behaviour.

"We've tried timeouts with (him)," Beagley says in a YouTube video from the "Dr. Phil" appearance. "That is a big joke."

In the video, Beagley goes on to explain that those previous methods of discipline — timeouts, spankings, forced exercise, soap in the mouth — didn't stop the boy from acting out and lying, so she turned to hot sauce.

When she's at her wits' end, the boy gets a cold shower, Beagley says.

Municipal law on child abuse lists several factors in determining what is reasonable parental discipline. One example of unreasonable discipline included in the code is the scalding, branding or burning of a child.

Though the code does not mention hot sauce specifically, the section on burning applies to hot sauce, according to the prosecutor's office.

The Beagley children haven't had physical injuries or medical care for injuries, the defence lawyer said.

The case has attracted the attention of Russian media because the boy and his twin brother were adopted from Russia when they were 5 years old, said Franklin, the prosecutor.


US adoptive mother says she is not guilty of cruel treatment of Russian boy


US adoptive mother says she is not guilty of cruel treatment of Russian boy


28.01.2011, 22.31



LOS ANGELES, January 28 (Itar-Tass) -- Jessica Bigley from Anchorage, Alaska, the adoptive mother of a Russian boy, says she is not guilty of cruel treatment of the child.

Her lawyer said on Friday she did nothing punishable under the child abuse law. The lawyer made the statement at the pretrial hearing at the Anchorage court.

Bigley said in a TV show in late December that she was straightening her disobedient child with pouring cold water over him and mouth washing with hot pepper sauce. The boy was eventually identified as Daniil Bukharov adopted by a U.S. couple in Magadan. Apart from Daniil and his twin brother Oleg, the Mormon family has another four children.

The lawyer said no one would have uttered a word if not for the Dr. Phil Show. Some think it is bad to spank a child, but she did not do even that, he remarked. The adoptive mother did not attend the hearing, and the lawyer was her representative. He stressed that the ‘straightening methods’ did not hurt Daniil.

The Anchorage police were informed about the situation on November 17, 2010. An investigation was held, and detectives saw the video-clip in which Jessica was shouting at the boy and he was crying of pain. The detectives also questioned Jessica, her husband and the six children. Prosecutors have no doubt that the cruel treatment charge is founded.

By Anchorage laws, this is an administrative offense punished with up to one year in custody or a fine of $10,000.

The Russian consulate general in Seattle, Washington, is controlling the investigation of a new case of violence upon a Russian child in the United States.

The new case of U.S. adoptive parents’ violence upon a Russian child accentuates the need for the immediate signing of an adoptions treaty with the United States, Russian Children’s Rights Ombudsman Pavel Astakhov said in comment on the situation of seven-year-old Daniil Bukharov from Magadan.

“Russia is unable to control the position of adopted children without that treaty. Four rounds of negotiations were held, and the draft agreement is being coordinated at Russian and U.S. departments. All the disagreements have been settled, and now we have to handle technical formalities. Hopefully, the treaty will be signed soon and we will protect Russian children in the case of abuse,” he said.

Otherwise, “Russia will have to consider the suspension in the adoption of its children by U.S. families or even the full ban on such practice,” Astakhov said.

“This is a case of harsh treatment of a child, not a way of strict upbringing the adoptive mother claims,” Astakhov said on the Vesti FM radio. “Urgent measures must be taken to protect the small Russian citizen who has found himself in a difficult situation. He must be protected from harsh treatment,” the ombudsman said. “Such treatment of a child must be described as torture and punished by U.S., Russian and international laws,” he noted.

Astakhov said that his office and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov were coordinating efforts in the assistance to Daniil Bukharov. “The Russian consul general in the United States is visiting the hometown of the adoptive family by the minister’s instruction to provide legal and other assistance to the boy,” he said.

According to the consulate general in Seattle, it is necessary to find out whether Daniil, his twin brother and other children are satisfied with their life in the Bigley family, a consulate representative told Itar-Tass.

The Russian Children’s Rights Ombudsman Office applied to the U.S. authorities for the immediate protection of the boy and the prevention of further risks to his health and life, Astakhov said. If the culpability of the adoptive parents is proven, it will be necessary to ensure the return of the Bukharov brothers to Russia, he noted.

Astakhnov ordered Magadan Regional Children’s Rights Ombudsman Nikolai Zhukov to verify the lawfulness of the adoption of Daniil.

“Seventy-five percent of children adopted in the Magadan region go to foreign families, while Russia’s average rate is around 30%,” he said. “Seventeen children adopted by U.S. families have died,” he added.

“Some 80,000 Russian children have been adopted by foreign families in recent years. The United States leads by the number of children adopted from Russia,” State Secretary – Deputy Education and Science Minister Yuri Sentyurin said earlier. “However, adopted children encounter a number of problems. Some of the foreign parents are simply not ready for the enlargement of their families.”

Thus, the inter-country adoption agreement will add an element of stability, he said. “For instance, the agreement will help regulate and control the activity of adoption intermediaries,” he noted.

U.S. Consul General in Moscow Richard Beer called for stricter control over families that adopt children. He also said that the agreement must correspond to the laws of the United States and Russia. The U.S. is very much interested in signing this agreement, but it will take some time to elaborate it, he said.

“The new agreement will be a legally binding document ensuring control over the security of children,” according to head of the Russian Foreign Ministry’s U.S. desk Alexander Zakharov.

A total of 3,800 Russian children were adopted by foreigners in 2009, including 1,432 in the United States. At the same time, the number of foreigners wishing to adopt children from Russia dropped by 60% in the past six years, and the number of Russian families wishing to adopt a child grew by 27%. No information for 2010 is available as yet.

The Family Code defines an inter-country adoption as a temporary measure for children who cannot be adopted in Russia. Inter-country adoption is possible exclusively on the basis of bilateral treaties.

According to Education and Science Ministry department director Alina Levitskaya, U.S. citizens have adopted about 50,000 Russian children in the past 20 years.

The problem came to the forefront after a U.S. foster mother returned a seven-year-old boy to Russia. The President Barack Obama administration said they shared the indignation of Russians over several deaths of Russian children adopted by U.S. adoptive and the latest refusal of adoptive mother Torry Hansen from seven-year-old Artyom Savelyev. The woman put the unaccompanied boy on the plane to Russia.

The Department of State said though that it did not want a moratorium on the adoption of Russian children by U.S. citizens because it could have a negative effect on parentless children.