Home  

ONDERZOEK MACHTSMISBRUIK EUROPESE COMMISSIE

ONDERZOEK MACHTSMISBRUIK EUROPESE COMMISSIE

03-12-2010 • SP-Tweede Kamerlid Nine Kooiman en SP-europarlementariër Dennis de Jong willen opheldering over het bericht dat de Europese Commissie over de hoofden van adoptiekinderen probeert meer macht naar zich toe te trekken. Een Roemeense kwaliteitskrant onthulde vandaag dat de Europese Commissie onderzoekers onder druk heeft gezet om te concluderen dat er behoefte bestaat aan een Europees Adoptie Agentschap terwijl het onderliggende onderzoek die conclusie niet staaft. Kooiman: 'We kennen allemaal de zucht naar meer middelen en meer macht van de Europese Commissie, maar dat de problemen rond adoptie daarvoor gebruikt worden, zou ik verschrikkelijk vinden. Juist adoptiekinderen verdienen extra bescherming en zorgvuldigheid.'

Nine KooimanAdoptieschandalen in het verleden zijn voor Roemenië aanleiding geweest te stoppen met interlandelijke adopties. Nu zouden er pogingen worden ondernemen Roemenië te dwingen de grenzen voor adopties weer te openen. De geruchten over het tot stand brengen van een Europees adoptiebeleid zijn er al langer. Kooiman: 'Ik heb daar recent nog een aantal kritische vragen over gesteld maar die zijn nog niet beantwoord. Maar deze onthulling van vandaag gaat nog verder dan wat ik al vermoedde.'

De SP is er geen voorstander van interlandelijke adopties Europees te gaan stimuleren, omdat het uitgangspunt moet zijn dat kinderen zoveel mogelijk in hun oorspronkelijke omgeving op kunnen groeien. Adoptie uit het buitenland is bovendien een kwetsbaar proces. Kooiman: 'Als het waar is dat de Europese Commissie onderzoeksresultaten manipuleert hebben we een probleem. Niet alleen omdat het onacceptabel is dat onderzoeken worden aangepast zodat Europa meer macht naar zich toe kan trekken. Maar vooral omdat het hier gaat om kwetsbare kinderen. Het belang van het kind moet voorop staan, niet het belang van de Europese Commissie.'

Kooiman heeft schriftelijke vragen gesteld aan de staatssecretaris van Buitenlandse Zaken en de staatssecretaris van Justitie, die over adoptie gaat.

Sri Lanka finds biological mother of supposed tsunami baby

Sri Lanka finds biological mother of supposed tsunami baby

COLOMBO — Sri Lanka's child protection authorities have traced the biological mother of a six-year-old girl who was suspected to have been sold as an orphan after the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, police said Friday.

Staff at the National Child Protection Authority (NCPA) took custody of the child after neighbours complained that she was a tsunami orphan illegally brought up by foster parents who were ill-treating her.

"We have now found that the child was born two days after the tsunami and the mother appears to have given the child over to this couple in Colombo," said NCPA investigator Indrani Abeygunasekara.

"We know where the biological mother is living and it is clear that she gave the child over for adoption, but did not follow the legal procedure."

Local media carry frequent reports of single mothers abandoning newborn babies to avoid a social stigma attached to children born out of wedlock.

Abeygunasekara said the foster parents and the child were taken before a judge who found that the allegation of abusing the child were untrue.

The judge ordered the couple to legalise the adoption of the girl.

The NCPA on Thursday appealed for public help to identify the girl's biological parents after initial claims that she was sold by a hospital worker soon after the tsunami.

Some 30,000 people were killed in the 2004 tsunami, which devastated much of Sri Lanka's coastline in the island's worst natural disaster.

The tsunami was triggered by an undersea quake that killed more than 220,000 people around the Indian Ocean.

The NCPA's figures show 995 Sri Lankan children lost both parents while another 3,409 lost at least one in the disaster.

Jurnalul Na?ional declan?eaz? anchet? la Comisia European?

Jurnalul Na?ional declan?eaz? anchet? la Comisia European?

Parlamentarii olandezi cer socoteal? Comisiei pentru raportul falsificat la comand?
Autor: MIRCEA OPRIS
6 decembrie 2010

Dennis de Jong(stânga), europarlamentar olandez,?i Nine Kooiman(dreapta), parlamentar olandez din partea Partidului SocialistDennis de Jong(stânga), europarlamentar olandez,?i Nine Kooiman(dreapta), parlamentar olandez din partea Partidului SocialistUn membru al Parlamentului olandez, din Partidul Socialist ?i un europarlamentar din aceea?i ?ar? au cerut deschiderea unei anchete, dup? ce Jurnalul Na?ional a dezv?luit culisele falsific?rii unui raport oficial chiar de c?tre Comisia European?. Parlamentarul olandez a trimis ?i cereri scrise pentru explicarea situa?iei c?tre Secretarul de Stat pentru Afaceri Externe ?i c?tre Secretarul de Stat pe  Justi?ie ai Olandei.

Nine Kooiman, parlamentar olandez din partea Partidului Socialist ?i europarlamentarul olandez Dennis de Jong au reac?ionat la ancheta prin care Jurnalul Na?ional a dovedit c? Comisia European? a falsificat un raport oficial privind adop?iile ?i drepturile copilului în cele 27 de state member ale UE. Cei doi politicieni au cerut clarific?ri vizavi de încerc?rile Comisiei Europene de a-?i exercita abuziv puterile pe seama copiilor ce fac subiectul adop?iilor. Cei doi politicieni olandezi au reac?ionat prompt pe data de 3 decembrie, la doar câteva ore de la publicarea investiga?iei de c?tre Jurnalul Na?ional. Ace?tia consider? “inacceptabil gestul Comisiei Europene de a pune presiune asupra cercet?rorilor care au întocmit raportul, pentru a impune concluzia c? este necesar? o Agen?ie European? pentru Adop?ii, în timp ce rezultatele cercet?rii au fost falsificate ?i nu duc în realitate la o asemenea concluzie”,  se arat? în pozi?ia comun? a celor doi.

“Cunoa?tem cu to?ii dorin?a pentru mai mult? putere ?i pentru mai multe atribu?ii pe care ?i le dore?te Comisia European?, dar folosirea problemelor privind adop?ia pentru a-?i m?ri influen?a mi se pare un lucru oribil. Mai ales c? to?i copiii care fac subiectul adop?iei au nevoie de maxim? protec?ie ?i îngrijire”, a declarat Nine Kooiman.

În trecut, scandalurile privind adop?iile au fost motivul pentru care România a stopat adop?iile interna?ionale. Acum continu? încerc?rile de a for?a România s? î?i redeschid? grani?ele pentru adop?ii. Zvonuri despre stabilirea unei politici europene privind adop?iile exist? de mult timp. “Am pus de curând câteva întreb?ri critice despre acest subiect guvernului olandez, dar nu am primit nici un r?spuns înc?. Dar dezv?luirile din ziarul românesc merg mai departe decât suspectam deja”, a mai spus Kooiman. Ea nu sus?ine stimularea adop?iilor interna?ionale la nivel european, pe motiv c?, pe cât posibil, copiii trebuie s? creasc? în cadrul familiei. Mai mult, adop?iile interna?ionale reprezint? un proces cu vulnerabilit??i. “Dac? este adev?rat c? exact Comisia European? manipuleaz? rezultatele studiilor, avem o problem?. Nu numai pentru c? rezultatele sunt manipulate pentru ca Europa s? î?i consolideze puterea. Dar în primul rând pentru c? vorbim despre copii vulnerabili. Pe primul loc trebuie s? fie interesele copiilor ?i nu cele ale Comisiei Europene”, a concluzionat parlamentarul olandez.

Nine Kooiman a trimis interpel?ri scrise c?tre Secretarul de Stat pentru Afaceri Externe ?i c?tre Secretarul de Stat pe Justi?ie ai Olandei, responsabili pentru adop?ii.

EC false report first international reactions

EC false report first international reactions

Dutch politicians ask for investigation on European Commission’s abuse of power

Autor: MIRCEA OPRIS 6 decembrie 2010

Twitter Facebook Email Imprim?

A member from the Socialist Party of the Dutch Parliament and a member of the European Parliament want an investigation, after Jurnalul National revealed a fake report issued by the European Commission on adoption and children’s rights. The Dutch Member of Parliament also send in Questions to the Dutch Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs & Justice in Holland.

Women head east for wombs to rent


Women head east for wombs to rent
 
Banned from paying someone to carry a child at home, women travel to Ukraine in search of surrogate mothers.
 Last Modified: 06 Dec 2010 11:57 GMT
Increasing numbers of infertile women are travelling to Ukraine because of its relaxed laws on commercial surrogacy[GALLO/GETTY]

"No drinking, no smoking, no taking drugs and eat healthily." As she lists the rules she wants her future surrogate mother to abide by, the voice of Rumyana Nencheva, 34, a dentist from Varna, Bulgaria, gets thinner and quieter.

Nencheva has come to Ukraine, seeking a surrogate mother. Diagnosed with uterine cancer in June 2008, she cannot bear a child of her own.

The 'infertility epidemic'

According to the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, ESHRE, in 2010, one in six couples in the world suffers from infertility.

In up to 35 per cent of cases, ESHRE says, this is down to physiological reasons in the woman. An average of nine out of 100 women aged 20 to 44 cannot have a child.

"Infertility is turning into an epidemic whose peak we have yet to see," says Georgi Stamenov, the head of Nadezhda (Hope), one of the main centres for reproductive health in Sofia.

She is a part of a growing phenomenon of women who are unable to get pregnant - and facing a ban on surrogate pregnancy at home - travel thousands of miles to Ukraine to rent another woman's womb.

Victims of society's stigma against childless women, especially in the Balkans, they also confront the hostility of the law in most countries to paid-for surrogacy.

They are drawn to Ukraine by the former Soviet republic's relaxed laws on commercial surrogacy, its relatively developed medical infrastructure - and the price.

Most women heading for Ukraine come from western Europe and the Americas - only they can usually afford the fees. But a growing number, like Nencheva, are middle-class professionals from the Balkans for whom the cost is still a huge sacrifice.

The staff at the International Surrogate Motherhood Center (ISMC), in Kharkov, Ukraine, tell Nencheva that she is not the only woman with that name from Bulgaria to have travelled more than 2,000km to Kharkov.

"We have many patients from the Balkans," the woman at the centre confides. While there, Nencheva spots another Balkan traveller, Snezhana, a rotund Macedonian in her forties.

Ethical dilemma

For women who want to escape the taboo on childlessness, and who do not want to adopt, the only solution is to find a surrogate mother who will carry their egg to maturity.

For most governments, however, surrogacy raises serious ethical dilemmas, mainly concerning women being paid to carry children for someone else.

That is why no European Union country allows commercial surrogacy, and why women seeking to rent a womb have to head east to Ukraine, Russia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, or even further afield to India.

In the EU, Austria, Germany, Sweden, France, Hungary and Italy prohibit all forms of surrogacy, paid-for or not. Britain, the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark and Greece allow surrogacy, as long as no commercial element is involved.

Ukrainian law, by contrast, is the most surrogacy-friendly in Europe. Article 123.2 of Ukraine's Family Code stipulates that women may receive financial compensation to carry someone else's child, and the law places no limits on the amount that can be paid.

The law also guarantees the biological mother's legal rights to the child or children born in the surrogate mother's womb. No adoption process or court order of any kind is required. The entire process is regulated by a contract signed between the agency or clinic, the biological mother and the surrogate mother.

By this, the surrogate mother surrenders all rights to the child carried in her womb. Only the names of the biological parents are entered on the birth certificate.

Valery Zukin, the vice-president of the Ukrainian Association of Reproductive Medicine (UARM), says 150 to 200 paid-for surrogate motherhood cycles take place in the country each year.

About half of the women renting these Ukrainian women's wombs are foreigners, usually from the US, Britain, France, Sweden and Italy, but also from Balkan countries.

Cheaper in Kiev

A curse in the Balkans

In Balkan societies the taboo against childlessness is especially strong. Here "the inability to conceive a child, and carry it to maturity, is regarded as abnormal," says Bulgarian psychologist Yana Pacholova.

"If people learn about it, the woman experiences shame, reproachful glances, negative attitudes, whispers behind her back, isolation and being pointed out by society," she adds.

Fear of barren women in Bulgaria is handed down the generations. Folklore teaches that childlessness is a curse and a disease.

In some parts of the Balkans, the families of a childless woman give her the child of a relative to bring up as her own, according to Violeta Stan, a child psychiatrist in Timisoara, western Romania.

But, among the Roma, the inability of a woman to conceive can lead to the annulment of the marriage. Among the Kardash community in Bulgaria, meanwhile, a mother-in-law can even chase away an infertile daughter-in-law.

The law is not the only reason why women seeking wombs to rent come to Ukraine.

"The main reason ... is the price," claims Marina Vasilieva, a patients' coordinator at New Life, a surrogacy centre that opened a permanent office in Kiev in March this year.

The ISMC in Kharkov initially quoted Rumyana Nencheva around 21,760 euros [about $29,000] for its services. Prices depend on the state of the biological mother's ovaries and on whether she requires donor sperm or not.

New Life in Kiev charges in American dollars. Its price is higher, at about $35,000, [26,000 euros], including an egg donation.

This is still only about one-third of the price charged in those US states, such as Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, Virginia and California, that permit commercial surrogacy.

For renting out their wombs, the agencies in Ukraine pay surrogate mothers from $7,000 [5,080 euros] in Kharkov to $12,000 [around 8,700 euros] in Kiev.

Beside that, would-be parents are expected to pay the women about $290 per month in support fees, or a total of about $2,610 for the whole pregnancy.

"They also pay for medical expenses during the pregnancy and for monitoring," Vassilieva explains.

"The terms for our surrogate mothers are quite good, for Ukraine," she says but stresses that being a surrogate mother is not an instant passport to wealth.

A single-bedroom apartment in the capital, Kiev, costs around $80,000 [about 58,000 euros]. Vassilieva notes that is at least six times the average fee a surrogate mother earns.

However, Ukrainian law does not limit the number of surrogate pregnancies a woman may carry.

Too pricey for the Balkans

While prices in Ukraine are far lower than in the US, they are well above what most people in Balkan countries can afford. It is far too costly for Ani Dimova, a frail-looking young woman from Asenovgrad in Bulgaria.

She still remembers her deep shock on discovering in her teens that she would never conceive. "At first, my parents tried to hide it from me," she says.

"I was 14 and had just had my first check-up in hospital. I went outside and waited for them in the car. When my mum came out, she was crying." 

Though naturally smiley, Dimova says few days go by when she is not reminded that she cannot have her own child. "I've thought about going somewhere where surrogacy is possible but the prices are very high," she says.

"They're not for the likes of us. In Ukraine, you'd need about 50,000 Bulgarian leva [around $34,000] saved up."

According to Bulgarian social anthropologist Haralan Alexandrov, today's more conservative climate on surrogacy - and the silence surrounding the issue - reflects the strength of patriarchal values in the region.

"Suffering is not to be talked about," he says. "There's no evil intent here, it's just how our culture operates."

In Varna, following weeks of online communication with the clinic in Ukraine, Rumyana Nencheva is back to square one.

Doctors at the Kharkov clinic have concluded that while her ovaries are not exhausted, they are almost so. Unsure whether she has a usable egg, the clinic has decided not to take her on. She finds it hard to decide on her next move.

Ani Dimova is considering moving to a country where surrogacy is permitted. Of Bulgaria's current ban, she says: "I don't want to think it will stay forbidden forever."

Doroteya Nicolova is a Varna-based journalist and editor. This article was produced as part of the Balkan Fellowship for Journalistic Excellence, an initiative of the Robert Bosch Stiftung and ERSTE Foundation, in cooperation with the Balkan Investigative Reporting Network.

Noted Therapist of Internationally AdoptionChildren Sues Critics

December 06, 2010

'He kept sending me teddy bears': How this unlikely lothario ran up a list of conquests

'He kept sending me teddy bears': How this unlikely lothario ran up a list of conquests

By EMILY ANDREWS

UPDATED: 00:18 GMT, 6 December 2010

0 View

comments

Russia, U.S. must agree 4 key points to complete adoption talks - ombudsman

Russia, U.S. must agree 4 key points to complete adoption talks - ombudsman

Topic:

 

Russian Children's Rights Ombudsman Pavel Astakhov

13:56 03/12/2010

© RIA Novosti. Grigory Sysoev

 

Related News

Russia and the United States have to work out a common position on four remaining points concerning child adoption in order to complete long-standing talks and conclude an intergovernmental adoption agreement, Russian Children's Rights Ombudsman Pavel Astakhov said on Friday.

"Four points, the most complicated, have yet to be agreed. These are acquisition of citizenship, control over the relocation of children, 'post-adoption,' when the first adoption is abolished and a second comes into force, Astakhov said.

"The fourth point is the ratification of the agreement itself," he continued.

The fifth round of talks between Russian and U.S. experts on the ratification of the child adoption agreement started in Washington on Wednesday.

"Everything should come to an end today. If the Americans accept all our stipulations, this will be the last round of talks," he said.

Astakhov said earlier that he might push for a freeze on adoptions of Russian children by U.S. citizens if Russia and the United States fail to seal an adoption agreement by early 2011.

Russia is one of the largest sources of adoptions for U.S. families, accounting for about 10 percent of foreign adoptions. The mistreatment of Russian children adopted in the United States has attracted public attention in recent months as a result of a number of highly publicized incidents.

In April, a 7-year-old boy was placed alone on a one-way flight to Moscow by his U.S. adoptive mother with a note claiming he was "psychopathic."

Following the case, Russia threatened to prohibit child adoptions by U.S. citizens until the countries sign an intergovernmental agreement guaranteeing the rights of adopted children.

MOSCOW, December 3 (RIA Novosti)

 

 Talks on bilateral child adoption agreement