Home  

Jurnalul National: Battle of international adoptions reaches peak

3 decembrie 2010

Battle of international adoptions reaches peak

Autor: MIRCEA OPRIS

 

The European Commission has falsified an official report, released only partially exactly one year ago, during the Conference on Challenges in Adoption Procedures in Europe, in Strasbourg from 30 November to 1 December 2009.  Exclusively for Jurnalul National several experts testified about the pressure put on their work by high-rank European Commission officials, in order to get to the conclusion that there is a need for the establishment of a European Adoption Agency. The stake of the new agency: creating a "market" for European adoptions in which Romania would be forced to reopen international adoptions. Behind this decision are pro-adoption lobbies from France, Italy, Spain and the United States.

On December 1, in Strasbourg - France, the European Commission and the Council of Europe organized a conference on adoptions. Originally it was to take place behind closed doors, but it became public after Jurnalul National revealed the backstage games behind it and the attempt to invite only the adoption lobby, through the mediation of the Italian EC official Patrizia De Luca. Surprisingly, at the end of the conference the conclusion of a report were presented, which recommended the need for establishing a European Adoption Agency. The long awaited report did not become public and was kept secret at the conference in Strasbourg. It was not made public until spring 2010, after pressure from several non-governmental organizations. Even so, the details of the report were never made public. One of the aims of the report, which needed the consent and approval of all Member States of the EU, was to reopen international adoptions at European level and thus forcing Romania to repeal the law 274, which forbids the adoption of Romanian children by foreigners.

One year after the scandal of this conference, Jurnalul National has been able to reveal what is hidden behind the report but, much worse, to also reveal pressure from the European Commission on the Belgian law firm, which drafted the report, in order to falsify data. The study has cost 250,000 euros, European public money, and consisted of interviews with more than 500 experts, lawyers, social workers, adoptive parents and adopted children. The study focused on the state of play of adoptions in the 27 EU member states. The final conclusion of the report was that clearly there was an urgent need to establish the European Agency for Adoption.

In reality, however, this conclusion proved to be a factual lie, for which officials of the European Commission signed, under the pressure of lobby groups in several Western countries with direct interest in the reopening of international adoptions from Romania. The study and the report were prepared by the law firm DBB - Demolin - Brulard – Barthelemy in Brussels, an associate of the French law firm PDGB.

Here is the stupefying testimony of one of the experts who prepared the country studies and the European Commission's report. "We were asked to conduct a study and a report identifying the needs of children, social services, the needs of the adopters and solutions for each country in order to improve the adoption and care system. We developed a questionnaire for each EU country. Then we interviewed over 500 subjects. Most of them answered they want better social protection, support for adopted children, post adoption assistance for adoptive parents after adoption, and some country-specific problems. There was only one question on whether it is necessary to establish a European Agency for adoptions. Only a few lawyers, out of the 500 subjects considered the new agency as necessary. Finally, we presented the conclusions and the report to the European Commission. When they saw the results they went mad at us and refused to acknowledge the study and its recommendations. They said the study would only be accepted if we would follow their main recommendation of setting up a European Agency for Adoption. Or, in reality, only a few had said such an agency would be good. Our firm’s prestige was at stake. We have been forced in the end to accept this conclusion, although it is not the reality. However they added whatever they wanted. We have been put in a situation with no alternative, because our company has several contracts with the European Commission and other European institutions. We could also risk losing these as customers. If we did not do it, they would have gone to another company and get the result they were looking for. "If you don’t make the recommendation about the new agency, you do not get your money” - this was the message of the European Commission ", Jurnalul National was told, on condition of anonymity, by one of the experts directly involved in the realization of the research and the report.

Lying was necessary for the lobby groups and adoption agencies in order to establish the "adoption market." "European States would have a limit, for example of two years, in which the children can stay in care, after which they would become adoptable. First in their country, and after a period of time they get on the European list. If not adopted this second time, then the children are put on the international adoption list. Such a system would take away the responsibility of the Member States to provide care for children temporarily or permanently deprived of parental care (UN Convention Rights of the Child). A European Adoption Agency – as EU institution staffed by EU civil servants – would take all responsibility away from national Member states and would create a full fledged free market. Adoption agencies from all over the world would be competing to get the children. Member States will have less incentives to create appropriate care for children, or to place children back into their own families, invoking that having the children adopted will save a lot of money on child protection and social protection costs. It is important to realize that children in care, foster and residential, have families and mostly are in contact with them. Adoption changes identity and cuts permanently all family ties”, said European official Roelie Post, seconded to the NGO Against Child Trafficking. She says the number of children legally adopted internationally has declined. Since Romania's accession to EU, the number of children available for adoption decreased worldwide from 40,000 to 20,000 per year. A future European Adoptions Agency will also have the problem of legality, because the EU has no legal powers on the issue of international adoptions, which are directly regulated by protocols between the Member States, and work under national competence.

Roelie Post followed this phenomenon and she believes that the report was meant to be used in the EU Strategy on the Rights of the Child. Without success so far, the EU strategy on children's rights, announced since 2006, but not yet finalized. The initiative was called "the Frattini strategy”, then Vice President of the European Commission, and who concretized the fake report of the EC in 2010. Roelie Post wrote a book about the export of Romanian ‘orphans’ until the introduction of Law 273 and 274 of 2004 that stopped the business with adoptions from Romania. The book and more information can be found at:
http://www.roeliepost.eu/buy-the-book/ 


 

INVESTIGATION OF ABUSE OF POWER EUROPEAN COMMISSION

SP Member of Parliament Nine Kooiman and SP MEP Dennis de Jong want clarification about the report that the European Commission is trying to gain more power over the heads of adopted children. A quality Romanian newspaper revealed today that the European Commission has pressured researchers to conclude that there is a need for a European Adoption Agency when the underlying research does not support that conclusion. Kooiman: 'We are all aware of the desire for more resources and more power from the European Commission, but I would find it terrible that the problems surrounding adoption would be used for that. Adopted children in particular deserve extra protection and care. '

Adoption scandals in the past have prompted Romania to stop intercountry adoptions. Attempts would now be made to force Romania to reopen its borders to adoptions. Rumors about establishing a European adoption policy have been around for some time. Kooiman: 'I recently asked a number of critical questions about this, but they have not yet been answered. But today's revelation goes even further than what I suspected. ”

The SP is not in favor of stimulating intercountry adoptions at a European level, because the starting point must be that children can grow up in their original environment as much as possible. Adoption from abroad is also a vulnerable process. Kooiman: 'If it is true that the European Commission is manipulating research results, we have a problem. Not only because it is unacceptable that studies are being adapted so that Europe can take more power. But mainly because these are vulnerable children. The best interests of the child must come first, not the interests of the European Commission. '

Kooiman has put written questions to the State Secretary of Foreign Affairs and the State Secretary of Justice, who deal with adoption. Dennis de Jong has asked the Commission for clarification.

****************************************************************************************************************************

INVESTIGATION OF POWER ABUSE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION

SP Member of Parliament Nine Kooiman and SP MEP Dennis de Jong want clarification about the report that the European Commission is trying to seize more power over the heads of adopted children. A quality Romanian newspaper revealed today that the European Commission has pressured researchers to conclude that there is a need for a European Adoption Agency when the underlying research does not support that conclusion. Kooiman: 'We all know the desire for more resources and more power from the European Commission, but I would find it terrible that the problems surrounding adoption would be used for that. Adopted children in particular deserve extra protection and care. '

Adoption scandals in the past have prompted Romania to stop intercountry adoptions. Attempts would now be made to force Romania to reopen its borders to adoptions. Rumors about establishing a European adoption policy have been around for some time. Kooiman: 'I recently asked a number of critical questions about this, but they have not yet been answered. But today's revelation goes even further than what I suspected. ”

The SP is not in favor of stimulating intercountry adoptions at a European level, because the starting point must be that children can grow up in their original environment as much as possible. Adoption from abroad is also a vulnerable process. Kooiman: 'If it is true that the European Commission is manipulating research results, we have a problem. Not only because it is unacceptable that studies are being adapted so that Europe can take more power. But mainly because these are vulnerable children. The best interests of the child must come first, not the interests of the European Commission. '

Kooiman has put written questions to the State Secretary of Foreign Affairs and the State Secretary of Justice about adoption. Dennis de Jong has asked the Commission for clarification.

.

INVESTIGATE ABUSE OF POWER EUROPEAN COMMISSION

SP Member of Parliament Nine Kooiman and SP MEP Dennis de Jong want clarification about the message that the European Commission is trying to draw more power over the heads of adopted children. A quality Romanian newspaper revealed today that the European Commission has been pressuring researchers to conclude that there is a need for a European Adoption Agency when the underlying research does not support that conclusion. Kooiman: 'We are all aware of the European Commission's desire for more resources and more power, but I would find it terrible that the problems surrounding adoption are used for this. Adopted children in particular deserve extra protection and care.'

Past adoption scandals have prompted Romania to stop intercountry adoptions. Now, efforts would be made to force Romania to reopen its borders to adoptions. The rumors about establishing a European adoption policy have been around for some time. Kooiman: 'I recently asked a number of critical questions about this, but they have not yet been answered. But today's revelation goes even further than I suspected.'

The SP is not in favor of promoting intercountry adoptions in Europe, because the basic principle must be that children can grow up in their original environment as much as possible. Moreover, adoption from abroad is a vulnerable process. Kooiman: 'If it is true that the European Commission manipulates research results, we have a problem. Not only because it is unacceptable that investigations are modified so that Europe can take more power. But especially because it concerns vulnerable children. The best interests of the child must come first, not the interests of the European Commission.'

Kooiman has put written questions to the State Secretary for Foreign Affairs and the State Secretary for Justice, who deals with adoption. Dennis de Jong has asked the Commission for clarification.

.

U.S. hopes to finalize talks on child adoption with Russia this week

U.S. hopes to finalize talks on child adoption with Russia this week

01 Dec 2010  

The United States hopes to finalize an agreement on child adoptions with Russia this week and sign it in the nearest future, a spokesman for the U.S. Department of State said.“Officials have met four times in both Washington and Moscow to negotiate this agreement that provides greater safeguards for children and families in the adoption process between the two countries, and we will anticipate that these talks tomorrow will be – with officials on both sides – reviewing the final text so that there can be a signing in the near future,” Assistant Secretary Philip Crowley told.
Russia and the United States are holding the fifth round of talks on drafting a child adoption agreement in Washington on December 1-3. The U.S. official also added that the United States hopes to conclude the process during this round of talks with Russia “but the formal agreement will not be signed.”

Source: RIA Novosti

WikiLeaks runs first confidential cable wire from Romania on adoption cases

WikiLeaks runs first confidential cable wire from Romania on adoption cases


WikiLeaks has published the first confidential document sent from the US Embassy in Bucharest to the US. The document, sent in 2006 by the then US Ambassador to Bucharest Nicholas Taubman refers to adoption cases. “On April 5, Embassy received by mail a letter from Theodora Bertzi, Secretary of State for the Government of Romania,s (GOR) Romanian Office for Adoptions (ROA), dated March 29 and including the final report of the GOR Working Group established in June 2005 to audit pending petitions by foreign families to adopt Romanian orphans and abandoned children,” writes the document. “‘The report shows that none of the 1,092 children identified in the pending petitions will be available for inter-country adoption, ostensibly for the following reasons,” the document goes on, further mentioning the reasons.

The Working Group had been expected to issue its report by the end of March, and Bertzi had announced publicly in December 2005 that none of the cases would be approved for inter-country adoption. However, the utterly non-transparent process of the Working Group and the opaque  quality of the report suggest some of the children may in fact remain in non-permanent situations in which their welfare is not being adequately protected. Post believes we should continue to press the GOR to open up the Working Group’s “conclusions” for a transparent, objective international review and to establish a legal framework that would allow inter-country adoption for appropriate pending  cases. We will provide Department with our updated recommendations soon,” ends the message.

Secret messages between the US Embassy in Romania and the US state were included in the 250,000 messages sent by American diplomats and recently revealed on WikiLeaks. The US Embassy in Bucharest sent around 775 secret messages to US, according to WikiLeaks. However, the US Embassy to Bucharest has recently said in a statement that by its very nature, field reporting to Washington is candid and often raw information, preliminary and often incomplete, not an expression of policy, and nor does it always shape final policy decisions.

WikiLeaks is a not-for-profit media organization, a project of the Sunshine Press, founded by Julian Assange. “Our goal is to bring important news and information to the public. We provide an innovative, secure and anonymous way for sources to leak information to our journalists (our electronic drop box). One of our most important activities is to publish original source material alongside our news stories so readers and historians alike can see evidence of the truth,” writes the company.

editor@romania-insider.com

Related posts:

  1. Wednesday headlines: RCS & RDS launches TV station, Romania gets 2% of allotted EU funds, WikiLeaks paves way for Obama critics
  2. US Embassy to Bucharest responds to WikiLeaks messages: field reporting doesn’t always shape final policy decisions
  3. Messages sent from Romania, included in recent WikiLeaks documents
  4. Romania ranks fifth in top of spam source countries – Panda Security report
  5. Constitutional challenges no longer suspend lawsuits; future corruption cases unlocked

Adoptive families blown away by costly fees

Adoptive families blown away by costly fees

Published: Tuesday, Nov. 30, 2010 5:25 p.m. MST
E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

David Howick met two boys from Ukraine last fall and felt the same kind of love he feels for his own children.

He worked with local adoption agencies to adopt Koli and Denyse as soon as possible.

But the lengthy, bureaucratic and expensive process got even more costly the day before Thanksgiving last week.

"It was either pay the expedite fee or abandon the adoption," Howick said. "So I paid the 2,080 dollars.

That expense came at the lieutenant governor's office last Wednesday, when Howick went to get an apostille, which authenticates and notarizes official documents both here and overseas.

It's a key part of the international adoption process.

Howick started the apostille process the day before Thanksgiving because adoption deadlines required dozens of pages to be postmarked by Friday. Since the office was closed for the holiday, Howick had to pay the expedited fee, an extra $1,300 on top of the already expensive $780 filing fee.

Others have complained about the cost of the fee in the past.

"The worst thing I heard out of their office was that we have other people in this same situation that we've had to charge the fee, too," said Howick, who is frustrated and outraged.

There are a lot of people applying for apostilles every month.

"At least 2,000 every month," said Paul Neuenschwander of the lieutenant governor's office.

"Mr. Howick knew that waiting to file all his documents at one time would lead to this kind of fee," Neuenschwander said. He could have saved the bulk of the expense by filing them earlier, or as he obtained them. Howick said that wasn't possible, claiming there are so many documents coming in at different times that he would have been at the Capitol every day, doing them one at a time.

Neuenschwander said that Howick was asking for a labor-intensive process to start the day before the holiday and that staff had to work under a time deadline in order to meet Howick's deadline.

"If you want to go to the head of the line, is it fair for everybody else that's in line, that's also paying their fees? So, You tell me," Neuenschwander said. "That's the way business is done."

Other adoption agencies sympathize with Howick. Lutheran Social Services is one agency that helps dozens of families navigate the system. There's no way to get away from fees that can top $60,000 per child in some cases.

Lutheran Social Services' Leslie Whited says government fees often feel like a slap in the face, just as it apparently does for the Howick family.

Especially when those hopeful, prospective parents want to adopt in a timely manner are often trapped by multiple deadlines.

"Pushing these papers forward at the end of an adoption ought not cost $2,000," Whited said. "That's a high fee at the end of an adoption that's already been expensive.

The lieutenant governor's office fees are set by the Legislature and are comparable, even less, than similar fees in other states, according to Neuenschwander.

The fee covers processing, training for notarizing and cross checking dozens of signatures that are contained in adoption applications.

But Howick says no amount of administrative fee should cost that much, and he's annoyed at what happened last week.

"Change the law, because it's simply not fair," Howick said.

WikiLeaks is Masha Allen

Long before Wikileaks founder and editor Julian Assange became the planet’s most hunted man for releasing hundreds of thousands of military and diplomatic documents, he published a eerily prescient exposé on Masha Allen entitled One Child’s Unending Abuse – From Disney World Girl to Drifter

In March 2008, Assange and business reporter Christopher Witkowsky, released what would become journalism’s epitaph on what had been an international story influencing everyone from Senator John Kerry to Oprah to President Putin.

Masha’s rapid ascent to worldwide fame in 2005 and 2006 was followed by an equally quick descent into oblivion. Assange and Witkowsky were the first and only media to explain Masha’s tragic unwinding.

Once the political darling of both the right and the left (the 2006 Republican controlled House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations has long-featured Masha Allen on its now-archived web page and Senator John Kerry spoke about his work on Masha’s Law as recently as last year), by 2008 almost no one cared or remembered anything about her shocking story.

Despite several abortive efforts by ABC News to uncover the truth about Masha’s situation, and a short-lived law enforcement investigation initiated by Senator Johnny Isakson in late 2007, no one from either the political or media establishments had the time or interest to uncover the uncomfortable truth behind Masha’s downfall.

Oranje Fonds steunt deskundigheidsbevordering vrijwilligers

30-11-2010 - Oranje Fonds steunt deskundigheidsbevordering vrijwilligers

In het kader van de deskundigheidsbevordering van de vrijwilligers die zich inzetten voor de (aspirant) adoptieouders in hun regio, organiseerde Wereldkinderen op zaterdag 6 november een trainingsdag in Utrecht. De trainingsdag werd mede mogelijk gemaakt door een bijdrage van € 6000,- van het Oranje Fonds. 

Het thema van de trainingsdag dit jaar was “de incomplete geschiedenis van een geadopteerde”, bijna 40 vrijwilligers waren op 6 november aanwezig. In de ochtend werd een workshop gegeven door kinder- en jeugdpsychologe Anneke Vinke. Het thema werd in de middag belicht door volwassen geadopteerden van Samenwerkingsverband Interlandelijke geadopteerden (SIG). Ook vertelde drie geadopteerde vrijwilligers van Wereldkinderen over een nieuw op te starten vrijwilligersactiviteit voor geadopteerde pubers. Er werd er een link gelegd naar de vrijwilligerspraktijk, ervaringen werden uitgewisseld en morele dilemma´s bediscussieerd.

Wereldkinderen telt nu zo’n 320 vrijwilligers, waarvan 220 vrijwilliger zich in zetten voor (aankomende) adoptiegezinnen. Jaarlijks organiseert Wereldkinderen specifieke trainingsdagen om de deskundigheid van vrijwilligers te bevorderen. Het zijn inspirerende dagen, waar vrijwilligers de kans krijgen om nieuwe kennis op te doen en hun ervaringen met andere vrijwilligers te delen. Wereldkinderen hecht er veel waarde aan dat vrijwilligers de gelegenheid krijgen om zich bij te scholen, zodat zij (aspirant) adoptiegezinnen zo goed mogelijk kunnen bijstaan.

Het Oranje Fonds is het grootste, nationale fonds op sociaal gebied. Per jaar besteedt het ruim € 24 miljoen aan organisaties die een betrokken samenleving bevorderen in Nederland en in het Caribische deel van het Koninkrijk. Door deze bijdragen ontmoeten mensen elkaar of vinden zijn een nieuwe plaats in de samenleving. Het Oranje Fonds wordt o.a. gesteund door de Nationale Postcode Loterij en De Lotto. De Prins van Oranje en Prinses Máxima zijn beschermpaar van het Oranje Fonds.