Home  

Evangelische Zentralstelle Für Adoption An EVAP Delegiert

Evangelische Zentralstelle Für Adoption An EVAP Delegiert

Posted on April 15, 2010. Filed under: Adoptivfamilie,Bewerber,Fachkräfte,Jugendhilfe,Netzwerke | Tags: Freie Träger der Jugendhilfe, Auslandsadoption |

Das Diakonische Werk der Evangelischen Kirche in Deutschland informierte den PFAD Bundesverband am 14.04.10 darüber, dass die Koordination und verbandspolitische Vertretung des Arbeitsbereiches der Adoptionsvermittlung auf Bundesebene an den Evangelischen Verein für Adoptions- und Pflegekindervermittlung Rheinland e.V. (EVAP) delegiert wurde.

Ab sofort übernimmt die Geschäftsführerin, Frau Inge Elsäßer, die inhaltliche und organisatorische Verantwortung für den fachpolitischen Informationsaustausch unter den evangelischen Fachdiensten sowie die verbandspolitische Begleitung des Arbeitsfeldes und vertritt das Arbeitsfeld Adoption in evangelischer Trägerschaft auf bundespolitischer Ebene.

.

Split arises over adoptions from Haiti

Split arises over adoptions from Haiti

NEW YORK | Logistical challenges and potentially bitter disputes lie ahead as passionate advocates of adoption press for changes that might enable thousands of Haitian children affected by the earthquake to be placed in U.S. homes.

The obstacles are daunting, starting with a need to register Haiti's dislocated children. If done right, this would enable authorities to distinguish between children who might be good candidates for adoption and those with surviving relatives willing to care for them.

There also will be efforts to overhaul Haiti's troubled child protection system, update its adoption laws and boost support for family reunification programs in Haiti.

But even before those goals are pursued, there are sharp divisions over how vigorously and quickly to seek an expansion of adoptions.

A prominent leader of the campaign to bring more orphans to American homes is Sen. Mary L. Landrieu, Louisiana Democrat, who thinks some of the major aid organizations active in Haiti, including UNICEF, are not sufficiently supportive of international adoption.

"Either UNICEF is going to change or have a very difficult time getting support from the U.S. Congress," Mrs. Landrieu said in a telephone interview.

Mrs. Landrieu and a few other members of Congress visited Haiti last week, meeting with top Haitian officials to discuss the plight of the devastated nation's orphans.

Since the Jan. 12 earthquake, about 1,000 Haitian children have been brought to U.S. families who had filed adoption applications before the quake. That pool of children in Haiti is dwindling, and adoption advocates, including many religiously affiliated agencies, are ratcheting up efforts to get a new, larger stream of adoptions in the works.

"There is great support in the United States to begin to open up opportunities for adoption as soon as possible," Mrs. Landrieu said. "There are thousands of children who don't have parents or even extended families to be reunified with."

UNICEF says a time may come when large-scale foreign adoptions would be appropriate — notably for older children and those with disabilities. But the U.N. agency and like-minded groups are asking for patience, saying the next priorities should be to register vulnerable children and try to improve conditions for them and their families in Haiti.

"It's complicated," said Susan Bissell, UNICEF's chief of child protection. "We've got to get a registration system in place. Once we have that, we want families for children — and that includes adoption. We are not against intercountry adoption, but we are against exploitation."

She said she was frustrated by the hostility toward UNICEF that is commonly expressed by leading supporters of international adoption in the U.S. "I find myself saddened by it, but it's not going to take the wind out of our sails," she said.

The chief operating officer for Save the Children, which is deeply engaged in helping Haitian orphans, said the tensions and disputes were likely to revolve around timing, with some groups seeking to resume large-scale adoptions much more quickly than other groups.

"It's hard to know how big the problem is without taking the time to go through this registration process, and I know for many it's an excruciating process," Carolyn Miles said.

"There are no records," she added. "To be sure that a child is an orphan, that will be difficult — going back to their villages, trying to find people who know their families."

The challenge of verifying children's statuses was illustrated in the weeks after the quake, when members of an Idaho church group were arrested for trying to take children they falsely claimed were parentless out of Haiti without government approval. The group's leader remains in custody, facing a possible trial for kidnapping.

The church members have said they only wished to rescue desperate children from suffering.

An estimated 40 percent of Haiti's pre-quake population was under 14, including about 50,000 living in orphanages and more than 200,000 others not living with their parents. It's been commonplace for poor parents to abandon their children, and some are taken in by wealthier families who use them as household labor.

Hundreds of thousands of Haitian children lack birth certificates or other identification, which could complicate adoption efforts. The Organization of American States is proposing a plan to provide all Haitian minors with ID cards, but estimates this wouldn't be completed until 2013.

Mrs. Landrieu hopes significant headway on registration can be made much faster than that, but says the many groups working on the task need to coordinate better.

Looking ahead, she hopes for a sizable number of new foreign adoptions by the end of this year — compared with just a handful at present now that the backlog of pre-quake applications has been largely dealt with.

In recent years, about 300 Haitian children annually were adopted by Americans. Mrs. Landrieu believes that number could rise to several thousand a year in the future.

"Children belong in families, not in orphanages or in some amorphous kibbutz," she said. "Americans take this call very seriously."

Haitian authorities say they are now accepting new adoption applications, though it isn't clear how long these might take to process.

The head of Haiti's child welfare agency, Jeanne Bernard Pierre, has conveyed some skepticism about efforts to speed up adoptions, saying Americans have taken advantage of the disaster to flout Haitian adoption laws.

"Since the earthquake, the U.S. Embassy has said, 'If you see a kid you like, here's the paper, you can take them with you,'" Miss Pierre told the Associated Press.

Michele Bond, one of the U.S. State Department's senior officials dealing with international adoption, firmly disagreed, saying the post-quake transfers of Haitian children to the United States were rigorously monitored.

She also expressed hope that Haiti would proceed with revisions to its adoption laws, which critics say are outdated. The laws place tight age limits on adoptive parents and prohibit adoptions by parents who have biological children — with exceptions granted only through presidential dispensation.

AP writer Jonathan Katz contributed to this report.

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/apr/14/split-arises-over-adoptions-from-haiti/

 

 

Journalist Chris Rogers pens 'semi-autobiographical' book

Journalist Chris Rogers pens 'semi-autobiographical' book

14 Apr 2010

Undercover, a new book by ITN reporter Chris Rogers, is based on the journalist's reports of conditions in Romanian and Turkish orphanages.

Former Newsround presenter Chris Rogers' has published a new book, Undercover, which explores the conditions in Turkish and Romanian orphanages.

Rogers' reports helped uncover examples of severe neglect and cruelty and he said the process of writing the book was "like therapy" after memories began affecting his personal life, the Elmbridge Guardian reports.

'Stalinist' social workers 'took children from loving mothers'

'Stalinist' social workers 'took children from loving mothers' By LAURA CLARK and PAUL BENTLEY Last updated at 8:34 AM on 13th April 2010 Comments (51) Add to My Stories Social workers behaved like officials in 'Stalin's Russia or Mao's China' in attempting to remove children from loving mothers, senior judges have said. They warned that social workers in two separate cases tried to put children in foster care without giving their mothers a proper chance to prove they were fit parents. Their actions risked fuelling public perceptions that social workers are 'arrogant and enthusiastic removers of children from their parents', Lord Justice Wall said. Battle: The couple with their son in Spain, before he was taken into care, have won the right to battle the decision for their eldest daughter to be adopted In one case, Devon County Council was attempting to remove a baby from his teenage mother because social workers believed she had a habit of forming relationships with dangerous men. But Lord Justice Aikens warned that social workers were effectively saying to the mother: 'Whatever you may do doesn't make any difference - we are going to take your child away.' He added: 'That is more like Stalin's Russia or Mao's China than the West of England - that is the impression you give.' In a separate case, Lord Justice Wall criticised the 'shocking' failure of social workers in the London borough of Greenwich to support a mother seeking to break free from an abusive relationship to win back her two children, who are in care. He said the case would do little to dispel the public perception of social workers in care proceedings as 'trampling on the rights of parents and children' while removing youngsters into 'an unsatisfactory care system'. The judge, who will today be sworn in as president of the High Court's Family Division, becoming the most senior family law judge in the UK, acknowledged that social workers were often 'damned if they do and damned if they do not'. But he insisted they had a clear legal duty to 'unite families rather than separate them'. His criticisms will feed public fears that social workers, in extreme cases, behave like 'child-snatchers'. There are concerns they sometimes break up families too readily and can be prejudiced against parents for frivolous reasons. In the Devon case, social workers believed a teenage mother, known in court as S, was unfit to care for her baby boy, H, because of her tendency to form relationships quickly with potentially dangerous men. Social workers said the father of her first child had been violent and the youngster had already been adopted. They argued that her new baby should also be placed in foster care and eventually adopted. But a county court had previously ruled the mother should be allowed a final assessment to see if she was fit to keep the baby. The council disagreed and went to the Court of Appeal last week seeking to overturn the directive. But Lord Justice Wall, sitting with Lord Justice Aikens, described Devon's argument as 'pretty unattractive'. 'Local authorities don't seem to understand that the public perceive them as pre-judging cases of this nature,' he said. The judges stopped short of saying the mother should keep her child, insisting only she should be given a fair hearing. Lord Justice Aikens said there was no evidence the mother had maltreated her baby in any way - or evidence that the violent father of her first child would have anything to do with baby H. He went on to condemn social workers' 'Stalinist' actions. The council has now withdrawn its appeal. A council spokesman said: 'This is a difficult and complex case in which the county council's first priority had to be for the welfare and protection of a vulnerable child.' In the Greenwich case, a mother known only as EH was seeking the return of her five-year-old son, R, and daughter RA, two. They had been taken into care in January 2008 after doctors discovered her daughter's left upper arm had been broken in three places. Medical staff believed it was not accidental and a judge later that year concluded the children's father, who had a history of violence, was responsible. Since June last year, the father had stopped having contact with the children, while the mother remained 'steadfast in her commitment' to them, the judges said. There was 'abundant evidence that she is a warm and loving mother'. But social workers in Greenwich were accused of failing to support her attempts to break contact with her violent ex-partner. Lord Justice Wall said the conduct of social services was 'hard to credit'. The court said Greenwich should give the mother more support and review its attempt to have the children adopted. The two cases will further rock public confidence in social services following the Baby P scandal, where social workers failed to spot signs of serious abuse and allowed themselves to be manipulated by unfit parents.

.

Sri Lanka Closed

Re: Adoptie Bolivia

Gepost door: Esther ()

Datum: 13 april 2010 19:49

Hallo Marian,

Wij hebben 2 maanden geleden ofzo gebeld. Toen bleek Sri Lanka al dicht te zijn. Wij hebben ze toen ook al gewezen op de onjuistheid op hun site. Inmiddels is er dus nog niets

Andrews asks parents to send adoption forms to Russia

The Irish Times - Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Andrews asks parents to send adoption forms to Russia

MINISTER FOR Children Barry Andrews has called on parents who have adopted children from Russia to provide reports on their welfare to Moscow to remove Ireland from an adoption blacklist.

However, he has insisted that the Government is powerless to compel the Irish parents of adopted children to send post-placement reports to the Russian authorities to help lift the current block on adoptions.

“Under Irish law, when a child is adopted they become as if they are the biological child of a couple and as such they have no obligation to provide reports to anyone,” Mr Andrews told The Irish Times .

“But I would certainly urge any parent that hasn’t complied with providing a post-placement report with the Russians to do so as soon as they can,” he said yesterday.

Last week Russia placed the Republic on its latest adoption blacklist, which also includes the US, Britain and New Zealand. It is also blocking adoption referrals and visas for hundreds of Irish couples currently in the process of adopting children from Russia.

The Russian embassy in Dublin said between 50-70 post-placement reports had not been completed by parents who have already adopted Russian children.

Moscow requires parents who adopt Russian children to send these post-placement reports to the authorities to monitor children’s welfare and to see how they are integrating into the family. All families sign an affidavit with the Russian authorities promising to provide the reports when they adopt a child.

The publication of the new blacklist follows a recent crackdown by the Russian authorities following the deaths of several children adopted by foreign parents.

Last week several Irish couples who are trying to adopt children from Russia were either refused visas to travel to the country or not allowed to register papers to finalise an adoption.

One couple threatened the HSE with legal action citing problems related to the organisation’s failure to deal with the problem of delays to post placement reports.

HSE social workers are required to oversee the drafting of post-placement reports, which must then be sent to the Russian ministry of education and science.

The HSE said it was working closely with the Adoption Board and the Minister for Children to bring a speedy resolution to this complex issue.

Both the HSE and the Minister for Children have been unable to confirm so far how many post-placement reports are delayed.

Mr Andrews said he had not been able to establish that fact, but he said the Government was working very hard to try and remove the Republic from the latest blacklist to enable adoptions from Russia to take place.

“We are particularly sensitive to how tough it is on a person who is over there or is due to go over there very soon or has a referral because they have been through such a long process,” he said.

Mr Andrews said he could not estimate when the current block on adoptions with Russia would be lifted. “I think it would be unhelpful to set timelines and build up false expectations,” he said.

Russia is the most popular country for Irish couples seeking inter-country adoptions, following the Government’s decision to suspend adoptions from Vietnam in January.

In 2008, 117 Irish couples adopted a child from Russia. Some 1,229 children adopted from Russia have been registered on the Adoption Board’s register of foreign adoptions since 1991.

High Court reserves order on Haynes plea in adoption case

High Court reserves order on Haynes plea in adoption case

2010-04-13

The Bombay High Court on Monday reserved its order in an adoption ‘racket’ case where a 27-year-old woman was deported from the United States following alleged fraudulent adoption process.

Jennifer Haynes, a mother of two, who was adopted by American couple George and Melissa Hancox in July 1989, had moved the high court seeking action against the Americans for International Aid and Adoption (AIAA) that had processed her adoption papers.

The Central Adoption Resources Authority (CARA) had last year filed a report stating that alleged fraudulent adoption process was carried out by an American agency (in her case).

The high court on Monday indicated that it is likely to dismiss Haynes’s petition seeking the de-registeration of the adoption agencies that sent her to the US in 1989 without, as alleged by her, following proper procedures.

Haynes was deported by the US immigration authorities as her citizenship formalities were not completed at the time of her adoption. She has claimed in her petition that she had a rough childhood in 50 different foster homes in the US and faced sexual abuse.

After hearing the arguments, Justice FI Rebello remarked, “The grievance now is not that of adoption but of citizenship.” The court had earlier directed Haynes to apply to the US embassy on the grounds of humanitarian parole. Additional solicitor general D J Khambata had said that the Centre would support her application. However, her advocate Pradeep Havnur told the court that without a high-level intervention Haynes’s application will not be considered. The court observed that as an adult Haynes had not applied for US citizenship and continued to live in the US as a child of her adoptive parents.

Haynes was convicted in a case of illegal possession of drugs in July 2004 and was under probation in prison. When her case reached the Board of Immigration, it was found that her citizenship formalities were incomplete at the time of her adoption in 1989 and they decided to deport her. She recently traced her brother in Ambarnath.

Aantal adoptiekinderen bijna gehalveerd

Webmagazine, maandag 12 april 2010 9:30

Aantal adoptiekinderen bijna gehalveerd

In de afgelopen jaren zijn in Nederland minder kinderen geadopteerd. Het aantal adopties is tussen 2004 en 2008 bijna gehalveerd. Dit komt vooral door een kleiner aantal adoptiekinderen uit China.

800 kinderen geadopteerd in 2008

In 1995 werden in Nederland ruim 700 kinderen geadopteerd. Vervolgens is het aantal adoptiekinderen gestegen tot 1 370 in 2004. Daarna is dit aantal weer afgenomen. In 2008 ging het om bijna 800 kinderen.

Red tape chokes adoption

Red tape chokes adoption

 

By Leah Boyd • DAILY PRESS & ARGUS • April 12, 2010

Lynn Amorino's heart breaks a little bit more every day she has to raise the boy she calls a son from 2,000 miles away.

?

The Fowlerville woman — who first met the Guatemalan child she named Nicholas when he was 7 months old — has been fighting to finalize his adoption for three-and-a-half years.

In the meantime, she and her husband have been paying for Nicholas to live in foster care, attend an English-language preschool and celebrate birthdays in Guatemala City without the benefit of knowing whether they will ever bring him home.

"I am trying to raise my child from a distance while no one can give me a clear answer as to why this is necessary," said Amorino, who claims the Guatemalan government is stalling Nicholas' adoption case without reason. "I think this is pure harassment."

Nicholas is part of a group of Guatemalan children known as "The Guatemala 900," representing the approximately 900 adoption cases still being processed out of more than 3,000 that were pending when the Central American country halted international adoptions in late 2007.

While Guatemala implemented stricter domestic adoption laws at the start of 2008 in an attempt to ease international ridicule about the country's booming adoption industry being corrupted by child trafficking, pending international cases were supposed to proceed under the country's old system once cleared by investigators.

Amorino said Nicholas' case was investigated, including a birth-mother interview, and cleared last year.

"They are stalling, and I'm not sure why, but it's not right," Amorino said, fighting back tears. "The older he (Nicholas) gets, the harder it is going to be for him to transition."

In February, Amorino said, Guatemalan authorities told her Nicholas' adoption papers would be signed shortly. Six weeks later, Amorino was told the case was being investigated further.

During a phone interview from Guatemala City on Thursday, Sonia Pascual of the Guatemalan attorney general's office said Nicholas' birth mother needed to be interviewed a second time.

(2 of 2)

"We are just receiving instructions from our boss," Pascual said. "There is nothing wrong with the adoption documents. Everything is OK. We just have to ask the birth mother if she still agrees with this. Once that is done, we will release the adoption papers."

?

Amorino said she is not satisfied with Pascual's answer or other statements made by Guatemalan authorities in media reports claiming the country is doing everything it can to resolve pending cases.

"They told me they were going to release the papers before," Amorino said. "This is another thing that I don't necessarily believe. As soon as this is done, they will say they need something else. Our case has already been investigated from head to toe."

While Amorino continues to fight her case through a lawyer she hired in Guatemala after her former adoption agency went bankrupt in the spring of 2008, she has also been petitioning lawmakers to intervene.

She said one Michigan lawmaker's office helped her get in touch with officials at the U.S. Embassy in Guatemala who said they could be of no assistance until the Guatemalan government releases Nicholas.

An e-mail petition is also circulating the Web on Nicholas' behalf.

"I've been desperately trying to reach someone of influence," Amorino said. "People make it seem like it's so easy to get help, but it's not. I'm one little case. You just feel so small and so powerless."

Amorino and her husband have spent about $30,000 on Nicholas' adoption process so far, including the more than $9,000 in processing fees they lost when their adoption agency went under, and six trips to Guatemala to visit Nicholas at his foster home.

However, the Amorinos said they don't mind the cost. They just want their son to come home to the teddy-bear-adorned room they've had prepared for him since he was an infant.

"That's what makes this harder; We've held our son," said Amorino's husband, John. "He calls us mama and papa."

He added: "But it's not just about us. There are hundreds of other cases just like ours that need to be brought to light."

In March, the Guatemalan government announced international adoptions would resume in June under a stricter system and a new agency — the National Adoptions Council, created shortly after international adoptions were suspended.

Previously, the system was handled by private attorneys. The new government-run system will significantly lower the cost of adoptions as well as the number of children available to international families.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Contact Daily Press & Argus reporter Leah Boyd at (517) 552-2857 (517) 552-2857 or at ldboyd@gannett.com

 

 

 

http://www.livingstondaily.com/article/20100412/NEWS01/4120312/-1/NEWSFRONT2

Baby dearth snags adoption

Baby dearth snags adoption

KANTIPUR REPORT

KATHMANDU, APR 12 - Despite government measures to make inter-country adoption foolproof and hassle-free, the prospective adoptive parents are unlikely to get the children of their choice if the present situation persists.

The Ministry of Women, Children and Social Welfare (MoWCSW) is facing shortage of children who are eligible for inter-country adoption. As a result, adoptive American parents, who have submitted applications seeking babies of their choice, will probably have to return empty-handed.

The problem occurred after most adoptive American parents, who make a large chunk of adoptive foreign parents, sought little Nepali children.