Home  

Minister Frattini meets with the Belarus Foreign Minister

Minister Frattini meets with the Belarus Foreign Minister

Rome 22 December 2010

Minister for Foreign Affairs Franco Frattini held a meeting today at the foreign ministry in Rome with the Italian families that have completed the international adoption process for Belarus children hosted in Italy in the context of a therapeutic programme for children affected by the events at Chernobyl. Participants in the meeting included the foreign minister of Belarus Martynov, Cardinal Mamberti of the Holy See, as well as the Hon. Giovanardi.

Expressing his congratulations to the families present, Minister Frattini also thanked the Holy See for its active role in facilitating a positive solution to the cases pending, as well as his hopes that other pending cases would soon be resolved.

Minister Martynov presented Minister Frattini with a list of 100 children the Belarus authorities consider eligible for adoption, thereby meeting the expectations of those Italian families still waiting. A common commitment was confirmed to seek a trilateral consultation mechanism—Italian government, Holy See and Belarus government—for the monitoring of such adoption cases.

Govt targets use of adoption as criminal cover


Govt targets use of adoption as criminal cover
The Yomiuri Shimbun
City, town and village governments would inform the Justice Ministry's regional legal affairs bureaus about dubious adoption applications under a proposed plan the government hopes will prevent illegal abuse of the adoption system, government sources said.
Under the plan, the legal affairs bureaus will investigate the persons involved in such applications, including those who file them and those designated as prospective adoptive parents and children, the sources said.
By the end of this year, the government plans to send relevant authorities a notice issued by the director of the ministry's Civil Affairs Bureau that will include standards for applying the envisaged system, according to the sources.
In a number of cases in recent years, the adoption system has been abused to unlawfully obtain loans, illegally acquire passports and commit fraud.
Some perpetrators applied for adoption procedures on multiple occasions to assume different surnames.
Currently, adoption applications have to be accepted by local governments unless the documents are technically flawed. To make matters worse, many local governments have had insufficient staff to adequately examine the details submitted in applications.
In an attempt to rectify the situation, the planned system will require local governments inform regional legal affairs bureaus and their branches about suspicious adoption applications, which will then be investigated by the bureaus.
The adoption system enables a legal parent-child relationship to be established between people without a blood relationship. It is designed to provide protection and nurturing to adopted children, and enables people without children to gain an heir.
There is no legal limit on how many times an individual can apply for adoption procedures. In fiscal 2009, a total of 85,094 applications were submitted nationwide.
However, many applications have been regarded as questionable or even unlawful.
In November, the Kanagawa prefectural police found a group of about 60 men and women from Tokyo and neighboring areas had made 197 adoption applications between them.
In separate cases, about 50 men and women made a total of 248 applications, according to the police.
On Nov. 26, the Chiba prefectural police arrested a man in connection with the allegedly illegal resale of mobile phones purchased by signing contracts under different surnames obtained through multiple adoptions.
Initially, the planned system will likely target cases in which multiple adoption applications have been filed within a short period. Legal affairs bureau personnel will examine the application history of the people who have filed the documents, and question the designated prospective adoptive parents and children.
Also subject to scrutiny will be cases in which submitted documents indicate a change in the permanent addresses of the prospective parents or children. The legal affairs bureaus will seek information from the local governments with jurisdiction over the previous addresses.
If it cannot be confirmed that the people named as prospective parents in an adoption application are truly seeking that status, the legal affairs bureaus will ask the local government concerned to reject the application.
(Dec. 21, 2010)

Obama signs two key adoption bills

Obama signs two key adoption bills
December 21, 2010
By Holt International,
Eugene Oregon
Great news! President Obama has approved two important pieces of legislation affecting adoptive families — the Help HAITI Act, signed into law December 9th, and the Adoption Simplification Act, signed November 30th.
The Adoption Simplification Act does more than simplify the process for families. It helps ensure the safety of adopted children. Previously, the U.S. required all children adopted from Hague Convention countries – including China, Thailand, the Philippines and India – to receive all their vaccinations before entering the U.S. Delivered all at once, these immunizations can be unsafe to young children. “It’s good public health,” Susan Cox, Holt director of public policy and external affairs, says of ensuring everyone receives routine vaccinations against infectious diseases. “But not for babies.”
With the passage of this act, all children 10 or younger – adopted from any country – may wait to get their shots until after they enter the U.S. Delaying immunizations has one additional effect on the adoption process – an effect important to every parent and every child eager to be united as a family. “It means the children won’t have to wait so long (to enter the U.S.),” says Cox.
The Adoption Simplification Act includes one additional provision. Families who’ve adopted from Hague signatories may now adopt their child’s siblings, up to 18-years-old. Previously, the cut-off age was 16. For the siblings who will now be able to reunite in an adoptive family, this news is monumental – as well as a major step forward in protecting the rights of orphaned, abandoned and vulnerable children.
Another breakthrough for adoptive families – and 21 Holt families in particular – occurred December 9th. Nearly one month shy of the one-year anniversary of Haiti’s massive earthquake, Obama signed into law the Help HAITI Act, ensuring citizenship for every child brought to the U.S. from Haiti on humanitarian parole visas.
Following the earthquake, the U.S. issued these visas to approximately 100 children already matched with adoptive families – including 21 children living at the Holt Fontana Village, the care center Holt supports in Haiti. Unlike children adopted through the usual process – who are automatically naturalized – these children faced years of waiting for the legal protections entitled to U.S. citizens. Among the children to become citizens are Nephtalie, pictured above with her sisters, Mazie Grace Jean, who joined the Polzin family in Wisconsin, and Sthainder, who lives with his family in Oregon. Click here to read more about how the 21 Holt Fontana Village children joined their families after the earthquake.
 

The Baby Trade

John Feffer

John Feffer

Posted: December 21, 2010 10:17 PM
-->

The Baby Trade
When Ok Chin was a child, her mother brought her to an orphanage. The family was poor, and her mother heard that the girl would get fed and clothed. Ok Chin would get an education. Maybe if the family's fortunes improved, she could rejoin her brothers and sisters.

Ottawa urged to bring stranded couple home

“Bring them home.”

That was the chorus on Tuesday after the Star highlighted the plight of a Canadian couple stranded in India for nearly five years because the government won’t issue citizenship or travel papers for their son who, due to a fertility mix-up, is not genetically theirs.

“Why is the CIC (Citizenship and Immigration Canada) so heartless and not allowing them to bring this kid back home,” asked MP Olivia Chow, the NDP’s immigration critic. “There should be more compassionate consideration,” she said, adding bureaucracy can sometimes destroy families.

In Montreal, Liberal immigration critic Justin Trudeau said too many Canadians are experiencing problems abroad and “it seems the government chooses which Canadians to help.

Haïti & France. Ces adoptions sont "précipitées et éthiquement condamnables", selon Pierre Lévy-Soussan, pédopsychiatre

Haïti & France. Ces adoptions sont "précipitées et éthiquement condamnables", selon Pierre Lévy-Soussan, pédopsychiatre

Pierre Levy-Soussan.jpgAlors que 300 enfants haïtiens en cours d’adoption sont attendus à Paris d’ici à vendredi, Pierre Lévy-Soussan, pédopsychiatre et psychanalyste, était l’invité de France Info ce matin.
Lui s’inquiète de l’accélération du processus d’adoption de ces enfants. "Attention à ne pas confondre temps de l’adoption et urgence humanitaire, prévient-il. Il faut du temps pour construire une famille".

L’opération menée depuis hier par le Quai d’Orsay est pour Pierre Lévy-Soussan, " précipité et condamnable au regard d’une certaine éthique de l’adoption".

Pour le pédopsychiatre, "toute accélération du processus juridique est préjudiciable aux enfants". Il estime à l’inverse des parents que Bernard Kouchner a eu raison de prendre le temps nécessaire à l’examen des dossiers. Il a mis en place "une logique adoptive et non une logique humanitaire", justifie-t-il, avant d’expliquer : "l’adoption n’est pas faite pour sauver des vies mais pour construire des familles".

Le spécialiste de l’adoption rappelle en outre que Haïti fait partie des pays qui n’ont pas signé la convention de la Haye et que ces enfants sont donc à haut risque de trafic d’enfants, ce qu’on appelle le blanchiment, c’est-à-dire rendre adoptable des enfants qui ne le sont pas en payant des familles.

Pierre Lévy-Soussan rappelle en outre que, dans le cas présent, il s’agit d’adoptions simples, c’est-à-dire d’adoption alors que les parents sont connus et que les enfants ont des liens avec eux. Dans ce cas précis, "accélérer la procédure met en péril la qualité de la séparation et l’équilibre psychique de l’enfant".

Enfin, le spécialiste, devant les images d’embrassades, prévient qu’il faut pour les parents " respecter le temps de l’enfant, ne pas se précipiter sur lui". Dans l’idéal, il eut fallu que les familles passent du temps avec l’enfant sur place, avant de le ramener. Au Brésil, les parents adoptifs sont tenus de passer trois mois, au Vietnam aussi. Ici, ils auront passé quelques heures.

Adoption racket unearthed in Delhi; four arrested

 
Adoption racket unearthed in Delhi; four arrested
PTI, Dec 20, 2010, 07.11pm IST
 
NEW DELHI: Delhi Police on Monday claimed to have blown the lid off an adoption racket in the capital with the arrest of four persons, including a doctor and two women, and rescue of an 11-day-old girl and an eight-month-old boy. 

The gang allegedly used to prepare forged documents showing that the woman who bought the child was admitted to a hospital and delivered the baby. The women were running NGOs and allegedly indulging in selling infants to couples. 

"The gang used to charge around Rs 1.8 lakh for a child out of which Rs 30,000 were given to the parents," Ashok Chand, deputy commissioner of police (crime), said. 

Pawan Sharma (38), Ranjeeta Bhasin (48), Shobha Gupta and Dr Atul Kumar were arrested from various parts of the city after investigations following a tip-off. 

The first to be arrested were Sharma and Bhasin from Shivaji Vihar when the former came to hand over an eight- month-old boy. Their interrogation led to Gupta while Kumar who allegedly helped forge some documents was also arrested. 

"Sharma told us that two months ago, a man from West Bengal had given him the boy which he gave to Bhasin for finding a customer. He also told us that he procured an infant girl from East Delhi for Rs 30,000," Chand said. 

Bhasin has been running two NGOs 'Nav Roshini Chetna Mahilla Samiti' and 'Nav Jyoti Anathalaya' in Raghubir Nagar from 1998. She told police that ten days ago she gave an infant girl to Gupta. 

Gupta was apprehended from Dwarka. She was running an NGO 'Child Care' in Vashistha Park from 2004. 

"She told us that she was introduced by one Anupama Lal to a young woman who wanted a child. Gupta told her that she could arrange her a girl for Rs 1.80 lakh. 

"The reasons given for the demand of money was that it would be required for completion of legal formalities. The money was paid and Gupta gave the girl to the woman. The girl has been recovered," Chand said. 

Gupta then took the woman to a medical centre in Prashant Vihar where Kumar got prepared certain "forged" documents, Chand said. 

"Kumar was also contacted by Bhasin and Gupta for preparing false documents regarding the infant girl. He showed the lady as admitted in his medical centre on December 11 and discharged next day and that she delivered the girl," Chand said. Kumar was allegedly paid Rs 20,000 in this case. 

Out of the Rs 1.80 lakh they get from the buyer, Sharma used to take Rs 25,000 while Bhasin's share was Rs 10,000, Gupta's Rs 75,000, Anupama Lal's (of Bal Vihar) Rs 20,000 and the doctor's Rs 20,000. Lal is yet to be apprehended. 

Both the infants have been handed over to SOS Upvan Home in Safdarjung Enclave for their care. 

The four arrested were produced before a court here which sent the doctor to 14 days judicial custody and other three to police remand till December 23 for further interrogation.


Read more: Adoption racket unearthed in Delhi; four arrested - The Times of India http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/Adoption-racket-unearthed-in-Delhi-four-arrested/articleshow/7134163.cms#ixzz18fUf9Jgo

British Public favours orphanages

British public favours orphanages in emergencies, poll finds - but aid agency warns of "misguided kindness"


Monday 20 December 2010

61% of British people think that building orphanages for children whose parents are missing or dead after a humanitarian crisis is a good idea, according to a new YouGov survey commissioned by Save the Children. The poll also found that 14% of people think that adopting those children out of the crisis country and placing them with a family in a wealthier and more stable country is a good thing.

But when asked about their own children, only 1% said if their child was orphaned during a humanitarian crisis in the UK the best thing to do would be to place them in an orphanage.

Some 92% said the best option would be for them to be adopted or fostered by relatives or a family from their own community or culture – rather than adopted by a family in another country (2%).

In a report published today, Save the Children warns that people who support orphanages or international adoption in the belief that they are doing the best for children suffering after a major emergency could in fact be putting those children in even more danger, and that often the best way to protect children is to keep them with people they know well and trust in their community.

The report, 'Misguided Kindness', says that putting children who have been separated from or lost their parents after a major emergency into orphanages, or evacuating them overseas, may mean they are permanently separated from their families or in the worst cases condemned to live in bad conditions where they can be vulnerable to abuse and exploitation. This may cause long term psychological damage and endanger children's health and wellbeing, with children under three particularly vulnerable.

The report comes at the end of 2010 – one of the worst years on record for humanitarian emergencies. This Christmas, the aid agency is urging people wanting to help children hit by emergencies to donate to organisations that are working to keep families together through family tracing and support, rather than giving direct to orphanages.

For example, nine year old Marie-Ange was separated from her family in Haiti when the earthquake hit in January 2010 and was fortunately taken in by a family for two months before being reunited with her family with help from Save the Children.

Joanne Doyle, report author and child protection adviser, said: "In the wake of devastating humanitarian crises, like last year's earthquake in Haiti, it is all too easy to get caught up in emotion and feel an overwhelming urge to support orphanages or build new ones for children or send them overseas for adoption.

"But this misguided kindness can actually cause significant harm to children and families who are already suffering and it may lead to them being permanently separated from each other.

"People may think that a child living in a brightly painted new orphanage may be more appealing than the image of one being cared for by relatives or a foster family in the humble surroundings of their home. But the best way to protect children is often to keep them with people they know and trust, even if reuniting them with their family may take weeks or months. It's usually much more cost-effective to support children within families than build orphanages, so we can help more children this way."

"Misguided Kindness" highlights:

• That four out of five children living in orphanages or other institutions have one or both parents who are still alive, according to research from developing countries.

• Even very short stays in institutional care can be extremely harmful for babies and young children. Some research suggests that for every three months a young child lives in an institution they may lose one month of development.

• The existence of orphanages can encourage poorer families to put their children in them in the hope that they will be better cared for after an emergency. According to a report released by Save the Children last year, in Aceh, Indonesia 97.5% of the children placed in residential care in the aftermath of the Boxing Day tsunami in Indonesia had been placed there by their families so they could receive an education.

• Poor 'gate-keeping' means children may be admitted to orphanages without proper checks to establish if their families are alive and whether it might be possible to reunite them with them, or other adults they know. In the worst cases, orphanages may even block family reunification efforts if they rely on having a certain number of children in their care in order to continue to receive financial assistance or donations.

• Well intentioned attempts to rescue children who may still have families by evacuating or adopting them outside of their communities or placing them in orphanages, not only goes against international guidelines but can be extremely harmful. It can also take funding away from much needed services that could support families to care for their children and help rebuild communities

For interviews call a Save the Children media officer on 07831 650409

Notes to editors:

• Save the Children's report Misguided kindness is a review of research done by leading humanitarian agencies and child protection experts. It is available for download: http://www.savethechildren.org.uk/en/54_13615.htm

• Save the Children's survey: All figures, unless otherwise stated, are from YouGov Plc. Total sample size was 2125 adults. Fieldwork was undertaken between 8th - 10th December 2010. The survey was carried out online. The figures have been weighted and are representative of all GB adults (aged 18+).

• Save the Children's earlier report, "Keeping Children Out of Harmful Institutions: Why we should be investing in family-based care" published in November 2009 reported that "Contrary to common assumptions, the overwhelming majority of children (at least four out of five) in care institutions have one or both parents alive." It is available for download http://www.savethechildren.org.uk/en/54_9678.htm

• Save the Children's work We work to reunite children with their families around the world – from the earthquake in Haiti to the Burma cyclone - and have done for many years. After the genocide in Rwanda, we co-ordinated a reunification programme with the Red Cross which lead to more than 56,000 children being reunited with their families over six years.

• To make a donation to Save the Children's Emergency Fund for Children go to www.savethechildren.org.uk/cef or call 0207 012 6400

Written Question Godfrey Bloom (500 surviys)

20 December 2010

E-010784/2010

Question for written answer

to the Commission

Rule 117

Written Question Godfrey Bloom (falsified report)

Parliamentary questions

20 December 2010

E-010783/2010

Question for written answer

to the Commission