Home  

Salvadoran group dogged in search for children missing years ago in civil war

POSTED: Sunday, Jul. 24, 2011

Salvadoran group dogged in search for children missing years ago in civil war

 

 - Los Angeles Times
GUARJILA, EL SALVADOR Her name is Milagro, or it was before her mother's heart broke into a million bits.

The girl was 4, dark-toned and skinny. On the day soldiers took her away, she wore a violet dress with short sleeves and tiny pleats. She had no shoes.

"They took my girl and said, 'Go, old lady!' " recalled her mother, Enma Orellana. The woman ran in fear, looking back just once, when the girl cried, "Mama!"

That was 29 years ago, when El Salvador waged war with itself and left hurts that have never healed. In the turmoil, more than 800 children disappeared, often into the hands of Salvadoran soldiers who used brutal tactics to battle leftist rebels and sympathizers.

The youngsters, including some whose parents had died, often ended up in orphanages under made-up names. Many were funneled by unscrupulous lawyers into a lucrative international adoption market or kept by the same military officers who took them. At least 400 remain missing.

Two decades after the end of the civil war, many Salvadoran parents - and, often, the children themselves - still search for loved ones, despite dimming memories and a trail that grows fainter each day.

For many, the only hope is a determined organization that uses shoe-leather detective work, modern tools such as Facebook and plenty of pluck to solve the wartime disappearances. It succeeds more than you would think.

Orellana's dream to see her daughter again rests with the group, called the Association for the Search for Missing Children and known as Pro-Busqueda. Over the years, it has located nearly half of the disappeared, with the largest number in El Salvador and the second-most in the United States. Adoptees have been tracked to Italy, Mexico, Germany and Belgium.

A nephew of Orellana's was tracked to France a few years ago. He had gone missing during the same army sweep in the northern province of Chalatenango in May 1982 that caught Milagro.

Encouraged by the discovery of the young man years after the war, Orellana, 60, a former schoolteacher, prays more than she eats and still allows room for happy news about Milagro, whose name means "miracle." Her memory freezes Milagro in childhood. She has no photos of her daughter, not even a scrap of her clothing. So many years later, unanswered questions keep Orellana tossing at night.

"One suffers so by not knowing," Orellana said, dabbing her eyes with a pink hand towel. Outside her spare block house in the forested hills of Chalatenango, chickens scratched in the gravel.

In just the last two years, Pro-Busqueda, founded in 1994 by a Jesuit priest, Jon Cortina, and funded mainly by European foundations and aid agencies, has found nearly 30 of the missing "children." By now, they're grown up, often with families of their own.

The searches are aided by DNA testing - the University of California at Berkeley's Human Rights Center helped create the database for making matches - but still require old-fashioned grunt work.

Investigators hunt leads in dog-eared adoption files and photos from orphanages that operated during the conflict. They tramp onetime conflict zones to trace last known steps and prod residents to recall traumatic, long-ago events. They venture into the most remote corners of the countryside, despite the presence of drug traffickers and dangerous gangs.

"Anyone who wants to think they can solve these from a desk is lost," said Ester Alvarenga, 46, the group's feisty coordinator.

On a recent day, Alvarenga met with Orellana in the rural hamlet of Guarjila, about two hours drive from the capital, San Salvador. During the visit, Alvarenga hit upon a possible way to reinvigorate the search: by finding childhood pictures of one of Milagro's grandmothers, whom the girl closely resembled.

Orellana, who sells some eggs to survive, takes comfort in the daily embrace a 6-year-old granddaughter, Enma Joceline, whose mother migrated to the United States. If she is still alive, Milagro is the girl's aunt. But leads are few.

"I dream that one day before I die, I might see that she has been found," Orellana said.

Alvarenga's main investigator, Margarita Zamora, understands the torment of those who have no answers. Her mother and four brothers and sisters have not been heard from since that sweep in 1982 when Milagro also vanished. During the same operation, at least 50 children are thought to have disappeared while fleeing army troops.

"I am living the same situation they are - the same uncertainty, the same anguish, the same hope," said Zamora, a petite former health worker who joined Pro-Busqueda in 2003.

The group's other successes sometimes make Zamora's own hopes jump, then reality kicks in. Pro-Busqueda has unearthed nearly 50 children's bodies over the years - a chilling reminder that these stories often end sadly. She concedes that the chances her mother is alive are "nil."

Zamora has developed an encyclopedic mastery of case files, memorizing dates, places and faces of the missing. She knows that a person's eyes or angle of cheekbone can lead to hunches that lead to breakthroughs that lead to long-awaited embraces.

Zamora helped locate Orellana's nephew in France after tripping across his photo in a forgotten Pro-Busqueda case file and recognizing the eyebrows of his mother, who had been looking for him. "I knew immediately," she said. He was tracked down through records from the orphanage where he had been taken and contacted in France by a French-speaking intermediary.

The young man, now 35, was at first enthusiastic about meeting his biological family, but has since cooled to the idea, Zamora said. "We're giving him space," she said.

 

Serendipity also helps. When a woman came into the group's office last month to launch a long-delayed search for her two daughters, Zamora could barely hold back her glee: One of the daughters years earlier had begun searching for the mother, who was long believed dead. The stories jibed, Zamora said, leaving her certain that the pending DNA test would confirm a match.

Lives can turn like that - people show up even now after learning about Pro-Busqueda, which is still relatively unknown outside El Salvador. When Alvarenga appeared on Spanish-language television in the United States recently, callers provided her with 10 new cases before she was off the air.

Wartime circumstances make these cases different from many other tales of adoptees reuniting with their biological families.

"You have to not only deal with the fact that you were separated from your family, but how you were separated is often hard to grasp," said Nelson de Witt, who was adopted by a couple in suburban Boston after his mother, a Salvadoran rebel, died in a raid in Honduras in 1982. De Witt, now 30, was located by Pro-Busqueda and a U.S. human rights group in 1997.

Despite a language gap at first, De Witt said he has developed a close long-distance relationship with his family in Central America and is working on a documentary film about them.

Sometimes class and cultural differences between adoptees who grew up in relative comfort abroad and impoverished relatives in El Salvador can be hard to bridge. De Witt said he learned of one adoptee brought up in the United States who was shocked by the tin-shack conditions of her birth relatives.

"She just couldn't relate and never went back," he said.

Salvadorans with missing relatives were thrilled when Mauricio Funes, a leftist backed by the former rebel movement, was elected president in 2009. Many believe that important clues to the whereabouts of their loved ones rest in sealed military files and want the Funes government to open the archives. But that has yet to happen.

Meanwhile, advocates for the families have turned to international courts. A case involving the disappearances of six children during army operations is currently before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in Panama.

In 2005, the tribunal ordered the Salvadoran government to pay $285,000 in restitution to the family of Ernestina and Erlinda Serrano, sisters who vanished in the 1982 Chalatenango sweep. The girls, then 6 and 4, have never been found.

"We saw them alive. They went away alive. The faith in us says they're alive," said another sister, Suyapa Serrano, who was a teen at the time.

Serrano, now 48, recalls an air of panic that day. Her mother, Maria Victoria Cruz, made it through an army cordon and was separated from the father and girls. The father went to fetch water. As soldiers neared, Suyapa hid her younger sisters in some bushes and fled.

It would be weeks before Cruz learned that her little girls had disappeared. And it would be years before she stopped blaming her husband and Serrano, the older daughter said through tears. Cruz died in 2004.

Her mother's accusations only worsened the heartache for Serrano, who pleaded over the years that the disappearance wasn't her fault. At last, she was able to shed the guilt.

"Finally, she said, 'I recognize you're not to blame because it's the war itself - such things happened,' " Serrano recalled her mother saying. "In the end ... she told me I was forgiven."



Read more: http://www.bellinghamherald.com/2011/07/24/2114356/salvadoran-group-dogged-in-search.html#ixzz1T7XPtyJB

On average a child is taken per day in Portugal

Community » On average a child is taken per day in Portugal

On average a child is taken per day in Portugal. This project is no longer exclusive to couples. In April alone 385 people were enrolled in the national lists of adoption, representing about one fifth of cases.

In Portugal, there are just over 500 children in a position to be adopted, but are more than two thousand cases of candidates to prospective parents. According to the latest data from the Social Security Institute (ISS), from June 2006 until April this year were 2,022 children adopted in Portugal. That is, each year 404 children found a new family.

Succeeded in adopting a child can take up to several years, but no one who dreams of having a child ceases to try your luck in this way, whether alone or accompanied. In April this year there were 1,879 applications for 385 couples and singles. That same month, in a position to be adopted only 532 were minors.

The adoption process is simple: you must cross the profile of the child with prospective parents to ensure that expectations are not disappointed. The cases of children who are adopted after being returned to the institutions are "residual", but the source of the ISS notes: "For there are fewer cases, the situation is always very harmful to the child, so just to be a worry" .

Most parents dream of the future to adopt an orphan baby but many children are able to adopt children, "marked by stories of life very complicated," explained the source of the ISS Lusa.

To try to reduce the setbacks and ensure that the "parents" are able, the ISS in late 2009 launched a Training Plan for the Adoption, which begins with training sessions (session A) to all who are still thinking whether or not to adopt a child.

The report of the Department of Social Development, 2010 ISS notes that a "curious" about the sessions with potential applicants: "It appears that you were a greater number of people interested in the adoption process in the period that follows or precedes the holiday period ". That is, "was in September which showed higher number of sessions."

Then, from first to second phase (session B), in which the couple or single person really decides to proceed, the number of "candidates" almost halved. According to the report, 1,629 participated in the session The trainees, while the session attended by about 770 B.

The ISS explains that this training plan was created precisely to ensure that people who are registered on waiting lists will not give the child the first setback.

Money Back for Adoption Scam Victims

Money Back for Adoption Scam Victims

Fifty-Nine Families Ripped Off by Orson Mozes to Receive $167,000 on Monday


Saturday, July 23, 2011

Nearly 60 families scammed by Orson Mozes’s adoption scheme will finally be getting a portion of the money they lost returned to them, almost two years after Judge George Eskin ordered the distribution.

Mozes was the subject of an Independentcover story in September 2009 after being sentenced for 17 counts of theft in July of that year to three years and four months in prison. He had been arrested for using a fake name in Miami, Florida, after being featured on the television show America’s Most Wanted. At the time of his arrest, he had roughly $300,000 with him, though it’s estimated he stole roughly $800,000 from 59 families.

After Mozes was sentenced, his ex-wife, Christen Brown, made a play for that cash, claiming she needed it in past child and spousal support. But prosecutor Paula Waldman argued that money should rightly go as restitution to Mozes’s victims. Eskin ultimately agreed with Waldman, and ordered the money distributed.

Brown appealed that decision, which held up the money. The District Attorney’s Office had already distributed about half of the $300,000 at that time, while the other half was in a bank account. Brown lost her case at the Court of Appeals, and the California Supreme Court declined to hear her the matter, exhausting her case and freeing up the money to go to the victims. “Christen Brown has no ability to get that money,” Waldman said.

The bank account was still under court order, however, until Friday morning, July 22, when Eskin signed an order to release the money. On Monday, the bank will write checks to 59 families, distributing just more than $167,000, based on percentages of the total that each family lost.

Mozes, who ran an international adoption agency out of Montecito called Adoption International Program, would string families along, promising them children he couldn’t provide, all the while asking for more money to make it possible. Families eventually realized they were being scammed, and approached the DA’s Office to look into the situation.

“This has been a long time coming and the victims have been incredibly patient,” said Waldman, who not only prosecuted Mozes but fought to have the money returned to his victims. “On a bright note, as a result of this painfully long appeals process, California now has published case law that states that restitution due to victims of crime take priority over back due child support when the seized monies were derived from a criminal enterprise. My hope is that this ruling will benefit future victims of crime for years to come.”

A lawsuit in federal court against Mozes and Brown filed on behalf of several of Mozes’s victims is still pending.

Successful adoption despite bankruptcy

http://www.radio-canada.ca/regions/manitoba/2011/07/22/005-suivi-adoption-faillite.shtml

You can also translate the French article - here it is in English:

Successful adoption despite bankruptcy

Two years after the adoption agency Imagine, based in Ontario, declared bankruptcy, a Manitoba family was able to adopt a little boy in Ethiopia.

The wait was longer because of financial woes of the agency, but the families are welded to complete their adoption file.

CARA Announces Release of New Guidelines and Temporary Suspension of Acceptance of New Dossiers

Friday, July 22, 2011

DOS Adoption Notice: CARA Announces Release of New Guidelines and Temporary Suspension of Acceptance of New Dossiers

India
July 22, 2011

Notice: CARA Announces Release of New Guidelines and Temporary Suspension of Acceptance of New Dossiers

CARA recently released new guidelines for intercountry adoptions. Please visit CARA’s website athttp://www.adoptionindia.nic.in/ for further information.

CARA also recently announced a temporary freeze on the acceptance of new adoption dossiers as it attempts to clear a backlog of cases pending from before implementation of new guidelines governing intercountry adoptions in India. CARA foresees lifting the suspension by approximately the end of September 2011 and will advise when they are ready to accept new dossiers. We will update the notice promptly. Applications that are already in process prior to the effective date of the new guidelines will proceed as normal.

Please note that the new guidelines direct that after September 30, 2011, all dossiers must be forwarded to CARA. CARA will no longer accept any dossier through a RIPA.

If you have any questions about the details of the guidelines or suspension, please do not hesitate to contact us by phone at 1-888-407-4747 or e-mail us at adoptionUSCA@state.gov.

Notice: Orphanage Closures in Ethiopia

Ethiopia
July 21, 2011
Notice: Orphanage Closures in Ethiopia
The Department of State has learned that several agencies are reporting to their clients the closure of Mussie Child Care Center in Hosana, Ethiopia due to a revocation of their license to operate by Ethiopian authorities. The Department is aware that rumors of several other orphanage closure are circulating through the adoption community.

The Department is seeking confirmation from Ethiopian authorities regarding the revocation of Mussie’s license and subsequent closure. We ask prospective adoptive parents and agencies that are hearing news of specific closures to inform the Department. The Embassy in Addis Ababa is working to gain confirmation of orphanage closure rumors from the appropriate authorities. Please send any specific information regarding orphanage closures to AskCI@state.gov with the subject line "Ethiopia Orphanage Closures."

Prospective and adoptive parents are encouraged to remain in contact with their adoption service provider to stay up-to-date on any information pertinent to their individual case. The Department will post any confirmation on www.adoption.state.gov as we receive it.

Blog: Ethiopia Orphanages Closures

Ethiopia Orphanages Closures

THURSDAY, JULY 21, 2011

Adoption Associates Response To Clients

Dear Families~

We have been informed that the government in Southern Ethiopia shut down 15 orphanages in the Awassa area in the last week. Obviously, many agencies, including us, have been affected by this. One of the orphanages is the Awassa location of EnatAlem. We have worked with this location for quite a while and have received many referrals from there. It is difficult to hear that they have been closed. Another orphanage that was shut down was EVADO. This is an orphanage we have also worked with for a long time, although, over the last 6 months or so, our trust level with the director has deteriorated significantly and we did not plan to continue working with this orphanage anyway.

Illegal children will be confiscated

China's family planning

Illegal children will be confiscated

The one-child policy is not just a human-rights abomination; it has also worsened a demographic problem

“BEFORE 1997 they usually punished us by tearing down our houses for breaching the one-child policy…After 2000 they began to confiscate our children.” Thus Yuan Chaoren, a villager from Longhui county in Hunan province, describing in Caixin magazine the behaviour of family-planning bureaucrats. According to Caixin, local officials would take “illegal children” and pack them off to orphanages where they were put up for adoption. Foreign adoptive parents paid $3,000-5,000 per child. The bureaucrats collected a kickback.

Stealing children is not an official part of Beijing’s one-child policy, but it is a consequence of rules that are a fundamental affront to the human rights of parents and would-be parents. The policy damages families and upsets the balance between generations. It is so hated that even within China it is now coming under political attack. For the first time a whole province, Guangdong, with a population of over 100m, is demanding exemptions (see article).

A thousand-mile journey begins with a single step

Chinese officials are fiercely attached to the one-child policy. They attribute to it almost every drop in fertility and every averted birth: some 400m more people, they claim, would have been born without it. This is patent nonsense. Chinese fertility was falling for decades before the one-child policy took effect in 1979. Fertility has gone down almost as far and as fast without coercion in neighbouring countries, including those with large Chinese populations. The spread of birth control and a desire for smaller families tend to accompany economic growth and development almost everywhere.

But the policy has almost certainly reduced fertility below the level to which it would have fallen anyway. As a result, China has one of the world’s lowest “dependency ratios”, with roughly three economically active adults for each dependent child or old person. It has therefore enjoyed a larger “demographic dividend” (extra growth as a result of the high ratio of workers to dependents) than its neighbours. But the dividend is near to being cashed out. Between 2000 and 2010, the share of the population under 14—future providers for their parents—slumped from 23% to 17%. China now has too few young people, not too many. It has around eight people of working age for every person over 65. By 2050 it will have only 2.2. Japan, the oldest country in the world now, has 2.6. China is getting old before it has got rich.

The policy’s distortions have also contributed to other horrific features of family life, notably the practice of aborting female fetuses to ensure that the lone child is a son. The one-child policy is not the sole cause, as India shows, but it has contributed to it. In 20 years’ time, there will not be enough native brides for about a fifth of today’s baby boys—a store of future trouble. And even had the one-child policy done nothing to reduce births, the endless reiteration of slogans like “one more baby means one more tomb” would have helped to make the sole child a social norm, pushing fertility below the level at which a population reproduces itself. China may find itself stuck with very low fertility for a long time.

Demography is like a supertanker; it takes decades to turn around. It will pose some of China’s biggest problems. The old leadership is wedded to the one-child policy, but the new leadership, which is due to take over next year, can think afresh. It should end this abomination as soon as it takes power.

In 2012 the European Commission will prepare a mega report on Bulgaria and Romania

Dear readers, we would just like to recall that all the texts on www.euinside.eu are a subject to copyright and if you would like to use any of our articles to republish, please contact us for details In 2012 the European Commission will prepare a mega report on Bulgaria and Romania http://www.euinside.eu/en/analyses/bulgaria-needs-to-show-results-in-fighting-organised-crime-and-corruption#ixzz1T2ATdqcx

In 2012 the European Commission will prepare a mega report on Bulgaria and Romania

Published: July 21, 2011 17:40, Ralitsa Kovacheva, Sofia, updated: July 22, 2011 10:32

“Changing the legal and judicial system to further align it with other Member States is a national task” and a fundamental reform of the judiciary should be seen as a national priority. This is one of the most important messages in the fifth monitoring report of the European Commission under the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism (CVM). The Mechanism has been imposed on Bulgaria (as well as on Romania) in 2007, when both countries joined the EU, in order to ensure that they will make the necessary reforms in the legal and judicial system.

In its fifth report the Commission unambiguously indicates that establishment of rule of law is a mission of the whole society, not just of the institutions. Not accidentally, the position of the civil society is widely covered in the report - it was mentioned 8 times, moreover in terms of an active participant with a corrective role. This is an important signal, given the resistance against the CVM, which is particularly strong in the institutions most criticised in the report - for example, the Supreme Judicial Council. This has not passed unnoticed by the Commission, which reports on the positive role of the CVM in promoting changes, although “at times the CVM has been contested and criticised by one or other element of this necessary national consensus”.

The report clearly states that nearly five years after joining the EU, Bulgaria must shift the focus: “The elements of the legal framework needed for the reform are now largely in place, even if not complete,” so “the next necessary steps in this process should focus on implementation by the judiciary and the police of the new laws”. From this perspective it becomes clear why most of the criticisms are focused on the judiciary and its leadership – because there the adopted legislation should be implemented in practice.

The political assessment of the Bulgarian government states that it “has shown sustained political will and commitment to pursue its reform strategy”. A major role in the reform process is assigned to professional associations of magistrates and civil society, because of the “increased public demand for an irreversible reform process”. “But the leadership of the judiciary has yet to show a real commitment to thorough judicial reform as slow progress is not just the result of shortcomings in judicial practice and in the Penal Code.”

The Supreme Judicial Council is passive and disengaged from reforms

Bulgarian judicial reform has two long-term goals - to improve accountability and increase the professionalism of those working in the system, the report recalls. The amendments to the Judicial System Act have created the legal basis to achieve these goals, improving procedures for appointments, training and appraisal, as well as for strengthening the integrity of the magistrates. But: “The Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) will need to show a strong commitment to reform by translating the new law into practice in order to effectively strengthen the management of judicial bodies, notably in terms of allocation of workload, in close cooperation with the Ministry of Justice, professional association and civil society”. Despite the amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code, the judiciary does not make a serious effort to meet the recommendations of the Commission in terms of improving the judicial practice, as well as the recommendations for systematic persecution of allegations of corruption among magistrates.

“Judicial appointments still lack the necessary level of transparency and credibility,” the report notes. It cites some concrete examples which provoked pubic debates in Bulgaria, summarising: “The subsequent mobilisation of professional associations of magistrates and civil society calling for reform of the Supreme Judicial Council sends an important signal of support for judicial reform. Recommendations by civil society to hold public debates and announce the names of candidates at an earlier stage are laudable. The appointment of highly competent and motivated magistrates of unquestionable integrity via transparent procedures, in particular for the new specialised court for organised crime, is indispensable to successfully implement judicial reform.”

Where is the General Prosecutor?

The acquittals in a number of cases involving high-level corruption and organised crime are again an emphasis in the report, because they show “serious deficiencies in judicial practice”. Although this is a permanent criticism in the CVM reports, “these deficiencies have not been properly analysed or followed up by the leadership of the judiciary, the Supreme Judicial Council, the General Prosecutor and the President of the Supreme Court of Cassation.” So far, the prosecution has behaved as though it has nothing to do with the report and has successfully avoided the punches in the fight between the executive and the judiciary.

Obviously, this has been noted by the Commission and this time the General Prosecutor is mentioned three times in the report in the same context. "The General Prosecutor should systematically analyse the reasons for acquittals in high level cases, make recommendations for the handling of future cases when shortcomings in the procedure have been identified and appeal the acquittal decisions when it appears that the Courts did not properly assess the evidence provided.” And again: “The generally passive attitude of the judiciary's leadership, the Supreme Judicial Council, the General Prosecutor and the President of the Supreme Cassation Court towards considerable shortcomings in judicial practice raise serious concerns.”

Therefore, the first recommendation of the Commission is to “establish proposals for a reform of the Supreme Judicial Council, the Supreme Cassation Prosecution Office and the Prosecution in general". Bulgaria is expected to demonstrate that the appointments in the judicial system, including the Supreme Judicial Council, fully respect the principles of transparency, independence, integrity and professional merit; that cases of corruption and malpractice within the judiciary will have disciplinary and criminal consequences; to “ensure complete electronic access to court verdicts and motivations and a strict application of the principle of random allocation of court cases.”

Is there a fight against corruption?

“The fight against high-level corruption has not yet led to convincing results. There have been very few final and enforced verdicts in this area and there are no indications of active targeting of high-level corruption.” Regarding the number of acquittals in major corruption cases, the recommendation is again the General prosecutor to examine the causes and take corrective measures. The analysis of some cases, made by the Commission and independent experts, shows “serious weaknesses in judicial and investigative practice”, primarily in terms of collection of evidence, witnesses protection, general lack of investigative strategies, comprehensive financial investigations and securing of assets. “Court practice is permissive and excessively cautious, overly attentive to procedures at the expense of delivering justice.”

Bulgaria continues to implement an integrated strategy to prevent and sanction corruption and organised crime and several measures have been taken, but “at the same time, the 2010 action plan focusing on tackling organised crime has not been fully implemented and has not been updated in 2011.” In this regard the Commission recommends greater involvement of the civil society through the participation of external experts in assessing the results of the strategy. The BORKOR project is also expected to deliver concrete results.

Conflict of interests is also not pursued effectively enough as the newly created dedicated commission is not still operational. The European Commission expresses concerns over “weaknesses in asset declarations and verifications of politicians, magistrates and senior civil servants” and expects false declarations and discrepancies to be effectively sanctioned.

Fight against Organised Crime – many police operations, less results

“In spite of persevering police actions to tackle organised crime, the overall results need to be significantly improved”. The Commission recommends police reform to be continued by “addressing shortcomings regarding the integrity and independence of police action, evidence gathering and witness protection”. In the technical update, accompanying the report, the issue of police practice to accept donations from private and legal persons to finance its operations is also raised. According to the Commission, “this practice challenges the independence of police investigation” and the issue requires further follow-up.

As expected, the Commission continues to insist Bulgaria to adopt urgently a law on asset forfeiture, although the draft legislation has recently been rejected by the Bulgarian Parliament. The Commission expects Bulgaria to have proper legislation allowing “non-conviction based confiscation and ex-officio verification of assets of senior officials, magistrates and politicians” and to show concrete results in its implementation.

5 years later

In 2012, 5 years after Bulgaria and Romania joined the EU and the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism has been launched, the Commission will make an overall evaluation of what has been achieved. Despite persistent efforts of Bulgarian and Romanian journalists to understand whether this means that the CVM may be abolished, European Commission spokesman Mark Gray answered briefly: everything depends on the results, which Bulgaria and Romania will achieve. He refused to comment on how the reports on Bulgaria and Romania would affect the assessment of the Member States on Sofia's and Bucharest's readiness to join the Schengen area.

But looking at the Bulgarian document it is obvious at first glance that one of the main requirements of our partners in the EU is not fulfilled – to show results in the fight against organised crime and corruption. For comparison we should note that in the report for Romania we can see a lot of criticism too, similar to that in Bulgarian, but a few key words make an impression. Romania has taken “significant steps” in some of the most important areas, the fight against corruption must “remain” a top priority (which means it is already a top priority) and Bucharest should “increase the pace of judicial reform” (as obviously it is currently under way).

Now we will hear another portion of mutual accusations between the executive and the judiciary. The first sharp reactions to the report are already a fact, but we will comment on these in a separate text. If, however, we assume that there must be a “positive hero” in the report - this is the Bulgarian civil society in the face of all those who keep pushing for a change. Now these efforts are taken into account and supported by the European Commission, which is clearly saying to the Bulgarian government: listen to the voice of your own citizens, give them a say, involve them into the overall effort to reform. Because, while the SJC believes it is self-sufficient and untouchable symbol of the (judicial) authority; while the police and the court are accusing each other, instead of working together; while the government is looking only for praises when reading the CVM reports; while citizens keep idly sitting side and waiting - there will be no judicial reform, no qualitative investigations, no convictions on important cases.

This is what the Bulgarian institutions and Bulgarian citizens must understand from this report. Five years later, it is time for us to realise that Bulgaria really is a member of the European Union and should become a really normal state. Nothing more, nothing less.

Read euinside's analysis of the 2010 CVM report here and a summary of the discussion on the CVM, organised by euinside and blogeurope - here.

Prince Andrew could be dragged into embarrassing Jeffrey Epstein case

Prince Andrew could be dragged into embarrassing Jeffrey Epstein case

By STEPHEN WRIGHT

UPDATED: 23:21 GMT, 21 July 2011

21View

comments