Home  

Hay 337 niños mayores de 5 años

Google translation:

omercio SA All rights reserved Contact Us Ministry of Education to include this subject in the school curriculum. "We have to solve prejudices and taboos that persist among Peruvians about adoption, and understand this is a final protective measure for children and adolescents with right to be beloved children, "he said. Will be close to his cousins Junior know in Texas the other members of her adoptive family, including his new sister, the biological daughter of Jeff and Tammy, age 15 (there is an older brother of 25 , son of Jeff). Marriage Junior Manuel Martin knew thanks to Grace and Leroy Hutchison, missionaries church to which they belong, St. Baptist Church of Universal. Hutchison Spouses in October 2004 in Peru adopted five orphaned siblings, and proposed for a family for the first cousin of the girls who stayed at Rainbow Home Huaraz, Junior Manuel. "They live two hours away from home of Martin," said Raul Alva, representative in Peru, with his wife Maria Elena, Villa Hope U.S. agency accredited for international adoptions to the SNA, which channeled the request for adoption of both marriages. More information For details of the campaign waiting Angeles visit the website www.mimdes.gob.pe / sna The National Adoptions Secretariat organized two briefings per month for couples intending to adopt. The next meetings will be held on September 1 and 15 and are required to participate workshops. More information call 332-0733. Andrea Castillo Calderon return Seite 2 von 2 The Business / Life and Future / Thursday, August 24th, 2006 27/03/2008 http://www.elcomercioperu.com.pe/EdicionImpresa/Html/2006-08-24/ImEcVidayFut ...

==================================================================

- Redacción Ediciones anteriores Buscar

Portada

Viewing cable 06BUCHAREST1298, SCENESETTER FOR CODEL LANTOS VISIT TO ROMANIA

Viewing cable 06BUCHAREST1298, SCENESETTER FOR CODEL LANTOS VISIT TO ROMANIA

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin

06BUCHAREST1298 2006-08-18 17:10 2011-08-30 01:44 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Bucharest

VZCZCXYZ0023

Parchetul ia la bani marunti adoptiile internationale

Prosecutor takes on international adoptions

The scandal caused two years ago, the statement Emma Nicholson

tolerance to criminalize illegal international adoptions by

Romanian authorities arrived back in actuality: the Romanian Office

for Adoptions has asked the Prosecutor General in connection with 11 such

Excerpts from memo sent to President Bush and updated to include passage of Resolution

monday, august 14, 2006

Excerpts from memo sent to President Bush and updated to include passage of Resolution

Summary:

In June of 2001, the country of Romania closed legal avenues for the adoption of unwanted children by loving parents from other countries. This change in policy was done in order to answer the charges made by Romania’s former EU rapporteur of corruption in the child welfare system and a need to review the currently child welfare legislation. Unproven accusations of adoptive parents selling their children’s organs and “baby buying” fueled the EU bureaucrats request for a total ban on inter-country adoption as a condition of Romania entering the European Union. Consequently, the new legislation which was signed into law in January 2005 bans all inter-country adoptions except in the case of biological grandparents, and has left 1,100 adoptions that were in progress suspended in permanent limbo. American (and European) families have now waited 3 - 6 years to adopt children whose adoptions were in progress prior to the ban.

Discussion:

US embassy cables: First ladies of India and California get on wonderfully – up to a point

US embassy cables: First ladies of India and California get on wonderfully – up to a point
·         
Friday, 04 August 2006, 13:17
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 05 NEW DELHI 005495 
SIPDIS 
SIPDIS 
STATE FOR INR/B 
EO 12958 DECL: 08/04/2016 
TAGS PGOV, PREL, PINR, PHUM, SCUL, KWMN, PINS, IN 
SUBJECT: A GARRULOUS SONIA GANDHI OPENS UP TO MARIA SHRIVER 
Classified By: Charge Geoff Pyatt for reasons 1.4 (B,D)
Summary
  1. Maria Shriver, wife of the governor of California and Sonia Gandhi, the most powerful person in India and the head of the ruling Congress party, have a one hour meeting to talk about "women's issues." For her visitors, Mrs Gandhi is warm, even effusive, admirable, informed far from her normal reserved self, her "italian" nature showing through. Reading between the lines reveals however that the warmth may not have been mutual. Key passages highlighted in yellow.
1. (C) Summary: In a relaxed August 3 conversation with California first lady Maria Shriver, Sonia Gandhi revealed a rare glimpse of herself. Usually withdrawn and reserved in public, she spoke at great length and radiated confidence on women's' issues and some aspects of her private life. Mrs. Gandhi demonstrated a strong commitment to a progressive left-of-center agenda aimed at combating socially conservative forces bent on oppressing Indian women. However, she was also realistic, revealing an in-depth knowledge of Indian culture, especially the rural/urban divide. At times suppressing her emotions, she spoke about the compulsions of political life, her parents' objections to her marriage to Rajiv Gandhiand the sacrifices she and her family have made. Her comments and demeanor put the lie to cocktail party suggestions that she courts Manmohan Singh's job. End Summary.
Two Dynasties Meet
------------------
2. (C) Maria Shriver, California's first lady and wife of Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, met with Congress Party President Sonia Gandhi on August 3 as part of her official visit toIndia. Shriver is in India to discuss her various initiatives on women's' affairs and to solicit Indian involvement. She is also laying the groundwork for a proposed trade mission led by Governor Schwarzenegger around February, 2007. After her stay in Delhi, she will go to Dharamshalla to meet the Dalai Lama. In addition to the Gandhi meeting, Shriver met with the head of the National Commission for Women and toured NGO's involved in women's' affairs. Mrs. Gandhi was accompanied by former Cabinet Minister Karan Singh.
Indian Women Bear a Heavy Burden
--------------------------------
3. (C) Shriver and Gandhi engaged in an over one hour exchange that was lively and open and covered many issues, both personal and political. Shriver explained that she was concerned with women's issues, including sexual abuse and exploitation and trafficking. Mrs. Gandhi replied that the situation for women in India is more troubling and traumatic than that in the US and other developed countries, as Indian women must deal with myriad problems not found in the west, such as child labor. In addition, most Indian women live in remote villages with severe "cultural compulsions" that work against women, making it difficult for the GOI to enforce the law. She pointed out that Indian women remain largely uneducated which is a "big problem" for Indian society and makes progress difficult. This compels the GOI to rely on television and radio to reach women with messages aimed at their concerns. Mrs. Gandhi noted that while she had a deep personal interest in women's' issues, she "only rarely" gave personal interviews aimed at female audiences.
And Sonia Bears a Personal Burden
---------------------------------
4. (C) Without prompting and at her own initiative Mrs. Gandhi then spoke at length about her personal life. She revealed that after her mother in law's murder Rajiv Gandhiwas under intense pressure to take up the political mantle of the Gandhi family, but both Rajiv and Sonia were intensely
NEW DELHI 00005495 002 OF 005
personal and had no interest in politics. According to Mrs. Gandhi, she urged her husband repeatedly to avoid politics, but he insisted. After Rajiv Gandhi became Prime Minister, Sonia was determined to avoid the limelight and "kept in the background." She clarified that she accompanied her husband to official events, but refrained from making political statements. After her husband's assassination, Mrs. Gandhiwithdrew, working only on a charitable foundation established in Rajiv's memory. In a candid revelation of her personal political stance, Mrs. Gandhi stated that "the right was becoming strong in India and Congress weak," tipping her hand and "compelling" her to enter politics to protect the Gandhi family legacy. She also revealed that her children were "not keen" about the idea, but eventually told her, "whatever you decide, we will back you."
Turning Down the PM Spot
------------------------
5. (C) Mrs. Gandhi was reluctant to provide details regarding her decision to turn down the Prime Minister post after the UPA's surprise 2004 electoral victory, stating that "I am often asked about this, but tell people that I will write a book someday with the whole story." She would only say that she "felt better" that someone else became PM and "did not regret" her decision. Shriver congratulated Mrs. Gandhi for her resoluteness and described her as "courageous." Clearly embarrassed by this adulation, Mrs. Gandhi made no response. She elaborated, at Karan Singh's insistence, saying that she was under lots of pressure, as the "party workers" were "very upset." They "could not understand" why she, as party President, was not taking up the post, since they had voted for her and won a majority.
Politics and Women
------------------
6. (C) Shriver noted that she chairs a "Women's Conference" that brings 11,000 women to California to discuss relevant issues, and reinforced the point that "women can change the world." Shriver invited Mrs. Gandhi to attend next year. She pointed out that last year's keynote speaker was Sandra Day O'Connor, who spoke about balancing public and private life, and how she left the Supreme Court to look after her ailing husband and spend more time with her children. Shriver emphasized that Justice O'Connor also did not want to enter public life but was "pushed by her husband," and noted how difficult it is to be a wife and mother and play a public role. Mrs. Gandhi made no commitment to attend.
Indian Steps to Bring Justice
-----------------------------
7. (C) Mrs. Gandhi explained the steps that her UPA government had taken and planned to take to help women achieve greater social mobility and rights. She explained that the GOI had instituted a "Panchayati Raj" program under which major decisions regarding the economic development of villages are made by Panchayats (village councils). To ensure female participation, Rajiv Gandhi had "reserved" 33 percent of the positions on the Panchayats for women. Although there were "some complaints" that the women were "manipulated by their husbands," Mrs. Gandhi asserted that "research had confirmed that women will invariably take the right decisions." She noted that the UPA now wants to extend the same reservations to Parliament and the Legislative
NEW DELHI 00005495 003 OF 005
Assemblies. Mrs. Gandhi confirmed that currently the number of female MPs was "very small," as "some parties believe that women should not be in power."
The Indian Contradiction
------------------------
8. (C) Shriver pointed out that her trip had made her aware of the "great contradiction" between a society in which women occupied many leadership positions, including, at times, Prime Minister," but still were denied many basic rights. Mrs. Gandhi agreed with Shriver, noting that several Indian states had female Chief Ministers, and that an increasing numbers of Indian women are CEOs of major corporations, doctors, and scientists, and "we will keep fighting." She explained that the situation for women varied from state to state, and that South India was "more progressive" than the North for various historical and cultural reasons, and that, for example, the state of Kerala supplied nurses to much of the Middle East.
Possible Indian Collaboration
-----------------------------
9. (C) Praising the contribution of Indians and Indian-Americans to California, Shriver suggested that perhaps the GOI could help the state government combat its teacher and nursing shortage. She also noted that her family is very involved in the Special Olympics program and would like 500,000 participants for the Indian Special Olympics and hoped that Mrs.Gandhi would attend the events scheduled for November 6. Mrs. Shriver pointed out that those with intellectual disabilities were making great strides in the US, with many becoming self sufficient. This is necessary, she pointed out, "as we do not have the relevant institutions in the US." Mrs. Gandhi conceded that Indian government institutions for the intellectually disabled are "nothing to write home about," leaving parents and NGOs to deal with the problem, and that in rural areas, such children are "often hidden" and their disability "kept secret."
Slow Social Change
------------------
10. (C) Mrs. Gandhi was not the least defensive about the gravity of India's social problems. When asked by Shriver about adoption, she noted that adoptions remained rare in India and most Indians continued to "see nothing wrong" in that. It is a "happy change," however, that more families are taking in orphans. She readily agreed with Shriver that many Indians still considered female children as "a problem" and preferred males and, as a result, more girls are abandoned than boys. Mrs. Gandhi reiterated that "education is the key to change" as much legislation is not enforced. This makes it necessary to "convince families and make them understand" to bring about positive change.
Personal Insights Into an Active Life
-------------------------------------
11. (C) Mrs. Gandhi then provided personal insights into her life, saying that she travels constantly all over India, often to remote areas to visit the common people, as "it is only by going out and interacting with people that we are in a better position to understand their problems and determine what they want." She confided that there has been a big
NEW DELHI 00005495 004 OF 005
change in the Indian mindset regarding education. Earlier, parents were not very interested in ensuring their children were educated, while today, "99 percent want to send their children to school." Everywhere you go in India today, she noted, you see children in their uniforms heading for school, and this is "something that makes us happy." In addition to education, Indian parents want their children to have access to basic health care - "doctors and medicines," and some assurance that they will have a job after they complete their education. Mrs.Gandhi worried that there will be huge numbers of young Indians leaving school with no guarantee of finding a job.
Population Control Off the Screen
---------------------------------
12. (C) Mrs. Gandhi pointed out that "population control" is a political taboo in India after Indira Gandhi was voted out of office over this issue. Although she insisted allegations of forced vasectomies and other abuses were "highly exaggerated" and "politically motivated," the historical memory has forced the UPA to focus on raising awareness and providing basic health services and means that progress on reducing the birth rate will be "slow." Again, education will be the key, as demonstrated by the small family norm in urban areas.
Culture and Fighting AIDS
-------------------------
13. (C) Karan Singh pointed out that population reduction and AIDS control are linked as it requires condom distribution to combat both problems. Mrs. Gandhi pointed out that Northeast India faces a severe AIDS problem, as it is a transshipment point for narcotics with a growing drug problem. Cultural factors also inhibit AIDS control, as the government "cannot be open" with condom distribution because of "certain mindsets." This compels the GOI to find an "appropriate way" to communicate with the population. Shriver responded that the US, as a multicultural society, faces many of the same problems, as men from some cultural backgrounds "don't want anything to do" with family planning and AIDS prevention. The key, she emphasized, was "empowering women to demand action on these issues."
India and the US
----------------
14. (C) Shriver observed that there was "no anti-Americanism" in India and that Indians from diverse backgrounds, cultures and religions have successfully found ways to coexist. Mrs. Gandhi replied that Indians are "inherently tolerant" as they have co-existed for centuries. Karan Singh added that the "freedom movement of Mahatma Gandhi" also played a crucial role as it was inclusive, pluralistic and emphasized that multiplicity of Indian culture. Mrs. Gandhi jokingly pointed out that the "Indian Left is anti-American," but then agreed that its stance was aimed at "American policy" rather than the American people. Karan Singh emphasized that he and "most Indians" objected to many aspects of current American policy but held no brief against the American people. Mrs. Gandhi also pointed out that many Indian Muslims "resent certain policies of the US."
More Personal Revelations
NEW DELHI 00005495 005 OF 005
-------------------------
15. (C) Mrs. Gandhi revealed that her own parents objected to her marriage to Rajiv Gandhi and she "resented their position" and went ahead and married him anyway. She also noted that she felt that her gender has never been an issue in her political life and that Indira Gandhi also made the same observation. In Hinduism, "women are seen as goddesses and no puja (worship) can take place without them," while, ironically, oppression of women is common. She also revealed that common women in India's rural areas do not hold her in great awe and don't think of her as a great personality, as "their priorities are so different."
Comment: A Relaxed Gandhi Provides A Rare Personal Insight
--------------------------------------------- -------------
16. (C) Sonia Gandhi is often stiff and detached when in public. This was a more relaxed Sonia, possibly because she felt a personal rapport with Maria Shriver. In this more relaxed setting, Sonia Gandhi revealed a left of center political orientation which stresses the strong role of the government in ensuring social progress and her inherent opposition to the social conservatism of the Hindu right. At the same time, she entertained no illusions that she or the UPA will bring about rapid social change or uplift quickly India's oppressed women. Instead, she embraced an evolutionary and patient approach based on a broad knowledge of Indian culture and traditions. She was, for example, acutely aware of the vast divide between rural and urban India and the inherent difficulty of pushing entrenched villagers into the 21st century. Deeply hurt by personal tragedy, she has erected a strong and stoic persona to prevent public access to her personal space. Whenever she spoke of the deaths of her husband and mother-in-law, she struggled to keep her emotions in check. Despite her carefully erected Indian persona, her basic Italian personality is clearly evident in her mannerisms, speech and interests. She presents an intriguing enigma of a warm private personality that remains concealed and is available only to her closest confidants and family members.
17. (U) Visit New Delhi's Classified Website: (http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/sa/newdelhi/) PYATT

Senate Passes Landrieu Resolution on Romanian Adoption Policy

Senate Passes Landrieu Resolution on Romanian Adoption Policy

Senate resolution urges Romania to reinstate international adoption.

August 2, 2006

WASHINGTON — The Senate unanimously last week passed, S. Res. 359, a resolution sponsored by United States Senator Mary L. Landrieu, D-La., that sends a strong message to Romanian President Traian Basescu that Romania should decrease barriers to adoption, both domestic and international, thus improving the well-being of their children.

"My hope is that the U.S. Senate's unanimous support for this resolution will encourage Romania to get rid of its law prohibiting international adoption," said Sen. Landrieu, co-chair of the Congressional Coalition on Adoption. "Tens of thousands of Romanian children today remain without permanent families when Americans and Europeans are willing to give these children safe homes."

A billion dollars of exports of Children (Social)

A billion dollars of exports of Children (Social)


         The old system of international adoption, practiced until 2004, has put more than one billion euros in the pockets of those who brokered the departure of Romanian children abroad.

Nearly 30,000 Romanian children were adopted internationally in 1990 till the end of 2004, when the new legislation came into force on the legal status of adoptions, which ended the "export" of children. Figure, detected Theodora Bertzi, head of the Romanian Office for Adoptions (ORA), was first circulated by sociologist Alin Teodorescu, according to a study in 2003. "If from 1997 until 2002, after the establishment of the moratorium were made for acts of international adoptions 10,000 children, the figure of 30,000 seems excessive for the period 1990-2004," said Bertzi.

$ 30,000 for a child

In addition, says boss TIME, Romanian NGOs were funded outside the families could receive children for international adoption, money that would have invested in programs in Romania. Besides these sums, the families gave foreign NGOs, the local partner, amounts between 30,000 and 50,000 euros, to adopt a Romanian child, said Bertzi. A simple calculation shows that Romanian children in these years has paid at least one billion euros.

Diana Nistorescu, executive director of the Federation of NGOs Active in Child Protection (FONPC), said that NGOs had money outside "afford to pay the fees of Child Protection which had priority in obtaining permits, benefiting ".

She added that "the old system was corrupt from the highest level until the last maternity, but was anyone punished. Bogdan Panait, chairman of the Authority for Child Protection (ANPDC) says that "most of the amounts taken for Romanian children remained abroad, where they were used including the election campaigns of politicians who supported the international adoptions.

Take the signature

Secretary of State TIME explain the large number of children who went to a foreign family in very simple ways of making adoptions, but also by the existence of trafficking networks. "Before 1997, adoption is made at the village hall. Came mother, the sign that he put the baby for adoption, the adoptive family and then sign for delivery. The transaction is easy, and the child had as a commodity," according Theodora Bertzi. The trafficking of children, reported both by the European community as well as by representatives of NGOs and of those who deal with child protection, is now in a process of "sleep, awaiting unlock international adoptions, the representative added TIME.

Nepotism between NGOs and state

Before the moratorium established in 2001, which provisionally closed valve adoptiior international Romanian laws "is clear connection between children and money, which led to the corruption of the system," said Bertzi. It maintains that there were several methods used for child trafficking clear violation of international law and signed by Romania.

One of these was the creation of a national network based on nepotism, between representatives of state institutions who were in the care of children and NGOs allowed to do international adoptions. "I found the bosses, who were at the Bureau of Adoptions, whose daughter was a lawyer and a company working on adoptions. So here is how the information flow. Or a director of swing, or was swing, whose face had a foundation in Contact other foundation outside, all the lawyer girl. She clearly knew where the children are the families who came and brought him there. The moment had families who wanted a child, it was made immediately adoptable. These were not in law incompatibilities, but they exist. For it could not have been punished, "says Bertzi.

Mothers, cheated the state and lawyers

Another method of obtaining a Romanian child was subverting systematic mothers, especially after 1997. First, lawyers interested NGOs to persuade the mothers, usually poor, as it is better for children to be raised several years of rich families abroad. Finally, mothers signed a notarial act in which he agreed to give families of children abroad, not knowing but that the separation was final, said Bertzi.

Simultaneously, social workers tried to separate the child from the mother and the staff was the cradle where the child is placed in the Register or the mother's family visits. So, by law, if a child appears obvious that was not visited by his family for more than six months, he became adoptable. Before 1997, the network traffic was in maternity and pediatric sections. "If you have information? Medical staff working there. Absolutely no remuneration for the job. It's hard to prove, that none of the parties would have any interest to say that he gave / give or take money," said head TIME.

Theodora Bertzi show that in May began receiving complaints from mothers tricked in the past, which now require children to be given back, but authorities can not do anything for them.

Traffic valve was closed

Romanian authorities say now in Romania, there was no framework that would allow such type of trafficking in children. "No can do traffic now. There is a clear procedure is that the new law who connects the hands," said Theodora Bertzi. Opinion shared by Secretary of State Bogdan Panait: "The law has cut much slack. We did not have signs that they would such things happen, plus corrupt foundations no longer permit or no longer object of now ". Diana Nistorescu from FONPC said: "I think it's very hard to steal the children of maternity or no network traffic. Such information usually sweating, being involved large sums of money".


Source: Newspapers 

http://www.presa-zilei.ro/stire/3692/export-copii.html

=====================================================================================================

Un miliard de dolari din exportul de copii (Social)


        Vechiul sistem de adoptie internationala, practicat pina in 2004, a bagat peste un miliard de euro in buzunarele celor care au intermediat plecarea copiilor romani in tari straine.

Aproape 30.000 de copii romani au fost adoptati international din 1990 pina la sfirsitul lui 2004, cind a intrat in vigoare noua legislatie privind regimul juridic al adoptiilor, care a pus punct "exporturilor" de copii. Cifra, semnalata de Theodora Bertzi, seful Oficiului Roman pentru Adoptii (ORA), a fost pentru prima data vehiculata de sociologul Alin Teodorescu, pe baza unui studiu din 2003. "Daca din 1997 pina in 2002, dupa instaurarea moratoriului, au fost facute acte de adoptie internationala pentru 10.000 de copii, cifra de 30.000 nu pare exagerata pentru perioada 1990-2004", a declarat Bertzi.

30.000 de dolari pentru un copil

In plus, spune seful ORA, ONG-urile romanesti erau finantate de familiile din afara ca sa poata primi copii spre adoptie internationala, bani care ar fi trebuit investiti in programe in Romania. Pe linga aceste sume, familiile dadeau ONG-urilor straine, partenere ale celor autohtone, sume cuprinse intre 30.000 si 50.000 de euro, pentru a adopta un copil roman, afirma Bertzi. Un simplu calcul arata ca pentru copiii romani s-a platit in acesti ani minimum un miliard de euro.

Diana Nistorescu, director executiv al Federatiei ONG-urilor Active in Protectia Copilului (FONPC), spune ca ONG-urile care aveau acesti bani din afara "isi permiteau sa plateasca taxe celor de la Protectia Copilului prin care aveau prioritate la obtinerea autorizatiilor, fiind favorizati".

Ea a adaugat ca "vechiul sistem a fost corupt, de la cel mai inalt nivel pina la ultima maternitate, insa nu a fost nimeni pedepsit". Bogdan Panait, presedintele Autoritatii pentru Protectia Copilului (ANPDC) spune ca "majoritatea sumelor luate pentru copiii romani ramineau in strainatate, unde erau folosite inclusiv in campaniile electorale ale politicienilor care sustineau adoptiile internationale".

Luati pe semnatura

Secretarul de stat ORA explica numarul mare de copii care au mers la o familie straina prin modalitatile foarte simple prin care se faceau adoptiile, dar si prin existenta retelelor de trafic. "Inainte de 1997, adoptia se facea la primaria de comuna. Venea mama copilului, care semna ca isi da copilul spre adoptie, apoi semna si familia adoptatoare de luare in primire. Tranzactia se facea usor, iar copilul ajunsese ca o marfa", potrivit Theodorei Bertzi. Sistemul de traficare a copiilor, semnalat atit de comunitatea europeana, cit si de reprezentantii ONG-urilor si ai celor care se ocupa de protectia copilului, se afla acum intr-un proces de "adormire", in asteptarea deblocarii adoptiilor internationale, a adaugat reprezentantul ORA.

Nepotism intre ONG-uri si stat

Inainte de moratoriul instaurat in 2001, prin care se inchidea provizoriu supapa adoptiior internationale, legislatia romana "facea clar legatura intre copii si bani, care au dus la coruperea sistemului", spune Bertzi. Ea sustine ca au fost mai multe metode folosite pentru traficul de copii, incalcari clare ale legislatiilor internationale semnate si de Romania.

Una dintre acestea a fost crearea unei retele interne, bazate pe nepotism, intre reprezentantii institutiilor statului care aveau in grija copiii si ONG-urile autorizate sa faca adoptii internationale. "Am aflat de sefi, care erau la Biroul de Adoptii, a caror fiica era avocat si lucra la o firma de adoptii. Deci iata cum circula informatia. Sau o directoare de leagan, sau fost leagan, a carei fata avea o fundatie, in legatura cu alta fundatie din afara, tot avocata fata. Ea stia clar unde, care sint copiii, familiile care veneau si ii aduceau acolo. In momentul in care aveau familii care doreau un copil, imediat acesta era facut adoptabil. Astea nu erau in lege incompatibilitati, dar ele existau. De asta nici nu puteau fi pedepsite", povesteste Bertzi.

Mamele, pacalite de stat si de avocati

O alta metoda de obtinere a unui copil roman a fost pacalirea sistematica a mamelor, in special dupa 1997. Pe de o parte, avocatii ONG-urilor interesate le convingeau pe mame, de obicei sarace, ca le e mai bine copiilor sa fie crescuti citiva ani de familii bogate din strainatate. In final, mamele semnau un act notarial prin care erau de acord sa-si dea copiii familiilor din strainatate, fara sa stie insa ca despartirea era definitiva, spune Bertzi.

Paralel, asistentii sociali incercau sa desparta copilul de mama, iar personalul leaganului unde era plasat copilul nu trecea in registru vizitele rudelor sau ale mamei. Astfel ca, potrivit legii, daca un copil aparea in evidente ca nu a fost vizitat de familia sa timp de mai mult de sase luni, el devenea adoptabil. Inainte de 1997, reteaua de trafic era in maternitati sau sectiile de pediatrie. "Cine avea informatiile? Personalul medical care lucra acolo. Categoric exista o remuneratie pentru treaba asta. E greu de dovedit, pentru ca nici una dintre parti nu ar avea vreun interes sa spuna ca a dat/da sau a luat bani", spune seful ORA.

Theodora Bertzi mai arata ca a inceput sa primeasca plingeri de la mamele pacalite in trecut, care cer acum sa li se dea copiii inapoi, dar autoritatile nu mai pot face nimic pentru acestea.

Supapa traficului a fost inchisa

Autoritatile romane sustin ca acum, in Romania, nu mai exista cadrul care sa permita un asemenea tip de trafic de copii. "Nu se mai poate face trafic acum. Exista o procedura clara, este legea asta noua care ii leaga de miini", spune Theodora Bertzi. Parere impartasita si de secretarul de stat Bogdan Panait: "Legea le-a taiat mult din elan. Noi nu am avut semne ca s-ar mai intimpla astfel de lucruri, plus ca fundatiile corupte nu mai au autorizatie sau nu mai au obiect de activitate acum". Diana Nistorescu de la FONPC spune: "Imi e foarte greu sa cred ca se fura copii din maternitati sau ca exista retele de trafic. Astfel de informatii transpira de obicei, fiind vorba despre sume mari de bani".


Sursa: Cotidianul

 http://www.presa-zilei.ro/stire/3692/export-copii.html 


Criticata de colegi - "Emma nu mai are legitimitate"

Criticata de colegi - "Emma nu mai are legitimitate"

Adoptiile copiilor romani au reusit sa puna pe jar relatiile europarlamentarilor liberali. Ei recurg la replici dure catre baroneasa Nicholson, pe care o acuza ca a reusit sa forteze mana Guvernului roman sa puna capat adoptiilor.

de Maria Toader

27/07/2006 (Actualizat 7:00) 16 vizite

Imprim?

Press Room » Press Notices » 19 July 2006 - Visit to Germany

Press Room » Press Notices » 19 July 2006 - Visit to Germany

On Thursday, 20 July, Integration Minister Anca Daniela BOAGIU will make a visit to Germany, to have talks with her Bavarian counterpart, Emilia MÜLER, Minister for Federal and European Affairs of the Bavarian Government.

During the visit, Minister Anca Daniela BOAGIU will also meet with Alois GLUCK and Barbara STAMM, President and, respectively, Vice President of the Landtag.

The aim of this visit is to present the most recent progresses achieved by Romania in its preparation for accession, to offer the German authorities arguments to finalise the ratification of the Treaty of Accession of Romania and Bulgaria to the European Union.

FOREIGN CITIZENS ADOPTED 44 CHILDREN FROM ARMENIA IN 2005

2006-07-11

FOREIGN CITIZENS ADOPTED 44 CHILDREN FROM ARMENIA IN 2005

Yerevan, Julky 11. ArmInfo. Forty-four children from Armenia were adopted by foreign citizens in 2005, Armenian Justice Minister David Haroutiunyan told ArmInfo. He said foreign citizens adopt about 40-50 Armenian children yearly in average. 75% of foreign citizens adopting children from Armenia are Armenians residing in the USA, France, Italy, Russia and other countries. Of course, tragic cases cannot be overseen, however, the government carefully studies the financial and social state of parents. Psychologists work with them for a long time to find out how the new family will perceive a new child, the minister said. Presenting an International Convention on protection of children's rights when adopted by foreign citizens at the Constitutional Court of Armenia, Minister Haroutiunyan said the document, which was signed on 29 May 1993 in Hague, aims to create mechanisms guaranteeing protection of children in case of their adoption by foreign citizens. Among the commitments Armenia undertook when signing the document is establishment of a consultative body regulating the adoption process. To note, Armenia joined the Convention with a reservation related Article 22: adoption of children by foreign citizens must meet the Armenian legislation and not the provisions of the Convention. To come into effect, the document requires ratification by the Armenian National Assembly.