Home  

internet research amrex

 

Quelle: http://groups.google.com/group/talk.abortion/browse_thread/thread/c8e75e24a51f2fbc/3191ee9b5c0b213c?lnk=st&q=amrex+adoption&rnum=6&hl=en#3191ee9b5c0b21

 

 

Most of the new referrals (particularly young and healthy infants) do
not even reach the photolisting as they are being placed with adoptive
parents from the joint list of waiting families (only INS approved
clients qualify). Children show up on the photolisting only after
being rejected by all "waiting list families". There is yet another -
a "designated referral" source of children, who also do not show up on
the photolisting.

Serg Nickols
AMREX INC

an explanation of amrex

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Daniel and Elizabeth Case [mailto:dancase@frontiernet.net]
Gesendet: Montag, 17. Juli 2006 01:56
An: Arun Dohle
Betreff: An Explanation of Amrex in the USA

 

Copied, clipped and pasted from a friend explaning Amrex's operations.

 

Organized crime, yes.

RELAZIONI POST-ADOZIONE UCRAINA

 
 

 01/01/2006 - RELAZIONI POST-ADOZIONE UCRAINA



In seguito alle nuove disposizioni comunicate all'Ente dalla Commissione per le Adozioni Internazionali, TUTTE le coppie che hanno concluso l'adozione dovranno provvedere all'invio puntuale delle relazioni post-adozione GIA' TRADOTTE IN DUPLICE COPIA. Le suddette relazioni dovranno essere trasmesse all'Ente che provvederà ad inviarne una copia al Dipartimento Statale di Adozione e protezione della tutela dei bambini e una copia al Ministero degli Esteri dell'Ucraina.
La scadenza con cui le relazioni devono essere inviate è la seguente:
1 relazione all'anno per i primi 2 anni dalla data di ingresso del minore;
1 relazione ogni 3 anni per gli anni successivi fino al compimento del 18° anno di età del minore.
Il modello è qui allegato.





http://web.archive.org/web/20070622162640/www.amonlus.org/privacy.php

LA DEPRESSIONE POST-ADOZIONE

LA DEPRESSIONE POST-ADOZIONE

01/01/2006

E’ ormai riconosciuto che la depressione post-partum sia un problema reale,e sempre più spesso si sente parlare di prevenire questa vera e propria patologia che colpisce le mamme e quindi la famiglia.

Nelle forme più blande si tratta di cambiamenti ormonali che non strutturano certamente una psicosi ma che colpiscono almeno il 50% delle donne che partoriscono.

La depressione post-adozione di contro non viene riconosciuta e spesso passa sotto silenzio, anche perché non ha un’origine così certa ed è quindi molto meno comprensibile. Trae origine dal lungo processo preadottivo, l’attesa e l’arrivo del bimbo sognato.

Testimony :: Eric Rosenthal

Testimony :: Eric Rosenthal
Executive Director - Mental Disability Rights International

Print

I would like to thank Senator Brownback and all the members of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe for this opportunity to speak today about the human rights of people with disabilities in Romania. I will describe the findings of Mental Disability Rights International’s investigative report, Hidden Suffering: Romania’s Segregation and Abuse of Infants and Children with Disabilities, published in May 2006. The Romanian government must be held internationally accountable for human rights violations against its citizens with disabilities.

Mental Disability Rights International (MDRI) is a human rights organization dedicated to the recognition and enforcement of the rights of people with disabilities worldwide. The rights of people with disabilities have been long overlooked by the human rights community, and MDRI is dedicated to bringing attention to the concerns of this population that is subject to stigma, economic and social marginalization, legal discrimination, and segregation from society in much of the world. MDRI has documented human rights abuses in 23 countries and we have published reports on human rights abuses against people with disabilities in Turkey, Peru, Kosovo, Mexico, Russia, Hungary, and Uruguay.

In our report, MDRI holds Romania to the same, universal human rights standards that we use to assess every other county. The life-threatening abuses, the extremely inhuman and degrading conditions of detention, and the large scale on which people with disabilities are segregated from Romanian society in stands out as some of the most serious and pervasive human rights violations MDRI has found anywhere. There are at least 30,000 children detained in institutions – and probably many more – who will be developmentally and psychologically scarred for life as a result of their improper and unnecessary placement in Romanian institutions. There are an even larger number of adults whose lives have been thrown away as they languish in almost total inactivity in abusive facilities.

These hearings come at a critical time when Romania’s treatment of children and adults with disabilities is under intense international scrutiny. The European Union (EU) is now reviewing Romania’s human rights record as it considers admitting Romania as its newest member state. MDRI has called on the EU to require concrete action by the Romanian government to end the abuses we identified and to fully integrate children with disabilities into the community. Similarly, I urge the United States to take a stand on these issues. Foreign assistance, trade, and political cooperation should be linked to ending these human rights abuses in Romania. Romania can end these abuses – if the international community takes a strong stand. The world community would not tolerate such extreme abuses against any other population.

The factual findings of our report are based on MDRI’s investigation in Romania from February 2005 through February 2006. Our findings are as follows:

MDRI’s investigation found that children are detained in numerous adult facilities. While the rights of all people detained in these institutions are being violated, children are particularly at risk.

I have visited institutions in twenty countries around the world. What I witnessed at the adult psychiatric facility Braila was the most disturbing horror I have ever seen. These children were close to death.

In 2004, the Center for Legal Resources, a Romanian human rights organization, found 51 children living in the Brailia psychiatric institution in atrocious conditions. The Center wrote to the government to demand change. When MDRI visited Braila in June 2005, we found 46 children living in horrendous conditions. I personally observed children tied to cribs, wrapped head to toe in sheets used as full-body restraints, with open wounds and bed sores all over their bodies, malnourished, and near death. We found teenagers so emaciated that they looked like they were 3 or 4 years old. Their spindly arms and legs were twisted into contorted positions from disuse and atrophy. Their eyes had sunken deeply into their skulls, and they stared blankly at the walls. Ribs and other bones stuck out from their skin, which seemed to sag from their bodies without any extra flesh.

Staff agreed to unwrap several of the children. As the staff removed the restraints on one girl, her skin came off with the sheet, leaving a raw open wound beneath it.

I ask members of the Commission to look at the cover of MDRI’s report, Hidden Suffering, that we have distributed today. The emaciated child in this picture is a teenager who weighed less than 30 pounds.

• At the urging of the EU, Romania has begun reforming its child care system. Yet children with disabilities have often been left behind. Romania adopted much-publicized legislation, Law 272, which bans placement of babies in institutions. But there is a loophole in this law that permits any child with a “severe disability” to be institutionalized. The law is commonly used to institutionalize babies with even the most minor disabilities. MDRI also found babies without any disabilities detained in institutions, a clear violation of this law.

In February 2006, MDRI found 65 infants—with and without disabilities—in an institution for children in the city of Timisoara. One nurse working this facility told us:

I have worked here for twenty years and my heart has turned to stone. I thought it would be better after the revolution, but it is not…. We do our best, but it is impossible for us to stop the spread of lice and contagious diseases….I give an injection and a baby cries and I have to keep going. There are too many. They become disabled from being here.

There are so few staff at this facility that the children never leave their cribs. These children are becoming psychologically and developmentally disabled as a result of this lack of attention. Institution staff informed MDRI investigators that some children could easily be adopted, but they are stuck in the facility only because they lack identity papers. It is impossible to say how many more facilities of this kind exist in Romania.

• As part of Romania’s reform, many children with disabilities have merely been moved from large to small institutions. While these facilities are newer and cleaner, they are still inappropriate for children and will contribute to increased disability. Extensive Romanian and international funding has gone into building new institutions, draining scarce resources from the process of creating foster care and other services necessary for the community integration of children with disabilities. According to UNICEF, nearly 200 new “small” institutions have been opened in recent years.

The government of Romania claims that it has reduced the population of its institutions for children from 100,000 to 30,000 in the last few years. Our investigation calls into question those numbers. There is no way to tell how many children are detained in adult facilities and how many children have merely been transferred to smaller institutions now called “family-like” environments. We visited one facility for 25 children in the center for Timisoara, where children had been moved after a notoriously abusive orphanage had been closed. The local child protection authorities referred to this facility as a form of community integration. In fact, these children were entirely segregated from society. We observed children sitting around in rooms doing nothing. Deprived of a family and of loving care, the children who grow up in these facilities will become more and more disabled.

As the psychiatric literature reveals, it is not just physical deprivation that can lead to loss of life. Emotional abandonment – resulting in “failure to thrive” – causes both emotional and physical damage to children at a critical time in their development. Even children who receive adequate food in clean institutions become disabled; some children are so emotionally neglected they will not eat – they may become malnourished and die.

In addition to the 30,000 children acknowledged to live in institutions, at least 9,000 babies are abandoned each year—a rate of abandonment that has not changed over thirty years since the Ceau?escu era. Romania has created a “maternal assistance” program to provide foster care for children with disabilities, but it cannot meet the enormous needs of the large number of abandoned babies. The government admits that at least 700 abandoned children languish in maternity wards of hospitals – other sources put the number much higher. There is a particularly large gap in services for children and adults with disabilities. Throughout the country, we found children and adults with disabilities detained in institutions because of the lack of community supports. Most children with disabilities face the prospect of life-time institutionalization unless major changes take place.

While the government of Romania has worked hard to demonstrate to the world that it is reducing the size of its orphanage population, what we have observed could be described as an enormous shell game – where children are being hidden as they are moved from one institution to another.

The Sub-Secretary in charge of Mental Health at the Ministry of Health admitted to MDRI in February 2005 that he has no way to estimate the number of children in adults facilities. According to the Sub-Secretary at the Ministry of Health:

It is not clear how many patients there are with disability in psychiatric hospitals. We do not know why or on which basis people are kept in different institutions. There are people with disabilities and without disabilities in institutions . . . patients’ rights are not well known, even by the doctors. . . . All institutions are over-crowded.

One of the greatest obstacles to reform – or for the implementation of any effective national policies regarding people with disabilities in Romania – is that responsibility for care of children and adults with disabilities is divided among numerous ministries and authorities at the local and national level. Nor is there any independent mechanism for monitoring human rights conditions in institutions or assuring quality of care. The Sub-Secretary told us:

To date, I have never received any complaint about what is going on in the mental health system. There is no mechanism in place to bring complaints to me.

Behind the closed doors of institutions for children and adults with disabilities, terrible human rights abuses take place. Yet there is no accountability for abuse, even when documented and publicized by human rights organizations in and outside of Romania. For example, the Center for Legal Resources and Amnesty International documented that more than 100 people died of exposure in the Poiane Mare psychiatric facility in 2003, and 17 people died in the facility in February 2004. To date, no one has been held accountable. The Romanian government still insists that people died of natural causes or “deficiencies of an administrative nature.” In papers submitted to the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture, the Romanian government described as “administrative deficiencies” such practices as the “lack of heating in the patients’ rooms, hypo-caloric food, insufficient and unqualified staff for the care of psychiatric patients, lack of good medicines, extremely reduced possibilities of pre-clinical investigation. . . .” etc

The government of Romania cannot remedy human rights violations that it continues to deny. The government has shamefully responded to MDRI’s report by simply denying the facts we have presented and claiming that we have fraudulently used old video. In an echo of communist-era thinking, officials have accused MDRI of being part of a conspiracy for one ulterior motive or another. Since the release of our report, however, our findings have been extensively corroborated by independent journalists from Romania, the United States, and Europe. ABC News broadcast video footage taken in early May 2006 showing institutions for children every bit as abusive as those depicted in MDRI’s report. The respected Romanian newspaper, Jornalul National, conducted a series of powerful independent exposes of institutions for children, labeling them “a refined Auschwitz.” A group of 33 service providers for children in Romania took out a full page advertisement in the Financial Times to protest human rights abuses against children in Romania’s child care system. Just last week, ITV news broadcast another two-part documentary on abandoned babies in abusive Romanian institutions. The Sunday Mail and the Times of London have also run similar stories.

There is a humanitarian crisis facing people with disabilities in Romania. This crisis is taking place on a grand scale. Immediate attention is needed to protect children and adults with disabilities from these life-threatening abuses.

Nirmayas neues Zuhause

Nirmayas neues Zuhause
Der schwierige Weg zum Elternglück
Die meisten Paare die Adoptiveltern werden wollen, sind Ende dreißig und daher zu alt, um ein Baby oder Kleinkind in Deutschland adoptieren zu können. Hier sind die Chancen besonders schlecht: Denn auf jedes deutsche Kind, das zur Adoption freigegeben wird, warten statistisch mindestens zehn Elternpaare. Als Alternative bleibt die Auslandsadoption. Auch das Ehepaar Matitschka hat lange für seine kleine Adoptivtochter gekämpft.
-->

Forum: message Robak SOS paid Romanian officals for 5th World Conference

Message #   
 
Search:   
 
Advanced
Pigs, more important than children   Message List  
Reply   Message #1849 of 11196 < Prev | Next >
 
"The lawmakers discussed the EU ban on slaughtering pigs, but not the welfare of children"

Linda Robak, U.S., representative of the For the Children SOS:
"First, thank you so much for allowing such a large portion of your newspaper content to be devoted to the very important subject of inter-country adoption and Romania's current child welfare legislation. And, extremely well-written and researched articles at that. Although many opinions and points have been raised within the articles and subsequent comments section, I would like to send my own.
 Emma Nicholson has long been an anti-inter-country adoption foe. It is her personal belief that inter-country adoptions should be banned - regardless of the circumstances that lead to an inter-country adoption. Given her official government position within the European Union - that of shadow rapporteur on Romania, former rapporteur on Romania, and VP of the EU Foreign Affairs Committee, it is completely irresponsible and questionable for her to allow her personal opinions to overshadow her role as a representative of the European Union and its constituents and her recommendations on what is best for a particular country, in this case Romania. Although she may claim that she has extensive experience with abandoned children, she does not poses a degree in any child development field. As a matter of record, her expertise lies in computer science, and yet she continues to refute renowned international experts' studies on abandoned children - in particular Romania's - and what is in their best interests. The Council of Europe supports inter-country adoption, and at a recent child welfare conference in Romania in February, made note of that fact (see attached speech), which was sadly never mentioned in any Romanian newspaper or on televised news. In addition, the recent amendment in the EU that states the pending cases should proceed and be considered for inter-country adoption was passed by a unanimous vote. Unfortunately for Ms. Nicholson, she was out of country for the vote. 
The current child welfare legislation was not written in consultation with child welfare professionals and NGO's. The original legislation - which had been worked on for more than 2 years and in consultation with innumerable NGO's and child welfare professionals - and not Americans -  did allow for transparent and carefully monitored and controlled inter-country adoptions. This drafted legislation was thrown out in February 2004 and the current legislation hastily written after consultation with Nicholson. It was then sent to the Romanian Parliament and voted upon in March of 2004 - with no discussion of its merits prior to the vote. In fact, I find it incredulous that in December of 2003 there were days of Parliamentarian discussion of the EU ban on slaughtering pigs at home, but no discussion on the welfare of Romania's children when this legislation was introduced for a vote! 
The issues with the new child welfare legislation are not only with the ban on inter-country adoption. In its efforts to appease Nicholson and the EU Enlargement Commissioners, and to prove that the current child welfare legislation has indeed proved to reduce the numbers of children in institutions, DPC directors are now being instructed to "reunite" thousands of children with their biological family members. On the surface, a wonderful proposition, and certainly one that is designed to cut the costs of caring for these children. 
However, to force a child who was abandoned at birth - and who has known via foster care, a group home, a private orphanage, or even a state orphanage, three meals a day, an indoor toilet and bathing facilities, schooling, and clothing - to now live with biological relatives who have never shown any interest in his/her welfare and who are unable to provide these things either due to extreme poverty or lack of concern, is unconscionable. Especially since the current legislation provides for no follow-up on the part of social workers after 30 days - which is rarely done anyway. It's unimaginable - and an obvious oversight - that a child should be returned to a biological family member that is unknown to him or her as a permanent solution and permanent home with no concern or oversight as to the child's welfare, and yet those who adopt a child - domestically or inter-country - are monitored and requested to provide documentation as to the child's well-being for an extended period of time. 
Yes, there are more children being placed in foster care. However, it should be noted that foster families - if they want a raise in their salaries - are now required to take care of two children, or one handicapped child. This would reduce the numbers of children in institutions somewhat; however there is a serious lack of foster homes. Thousands of children still lay in cribs in hospitals across Romania - and yet those children aren't counted in the statistics of children in government care. 
I have no doubt that there are Romanian politicians and child welfare professionals who are truly concerned about the current child welfare crisis in Romania - and it is a crisis regardless of what Nicholson and others would like to believe. And yet I cannot help but question the concern at the uppermost levels in the Romanian government for those who are directly responsible for these children. 
In November of 2005 I attended the 2nd World Conference on Children Without Parents in Boston, Massachusetts sponsored by Harvard University and the International Advocates fro Children. Thirty-one countries participated in discussions and seminars concerning all of the issues surrounding abandoned children in government care. After receiving the invitation to attend, a staff member in Theodora Bertzi's department wrote to the sponsors to inquire if there was financial assistance available to enable two staff members to come, as the Romanian government did not have the funds available to allow them to do so. As it was two weeks prior to the conference when they were notified, the conference organizers had already dispersed with assistance money to other countries. Consequently, they sent urgent e-mails to American organizations asking for donations for the Romanian staffers, including For the Children SOS, a grass-roots group that is a non-profit organization that funds its efforts via donations from members, and advocates for Romania's abandoned children, including the children who await their approval to be adopted inter-country. Unbeknownst to them, FTC SOS members raised all of the money needed to fund the costs of airfare, hotel rooms, and meals for two staffers that Theodora Bertzi selected to attend and represent Romania. We felt that it was important for Romanian child welfare government employees to be given the opportunity to meet child welfare professionals from other countries and to hear professionals speak about the latest research and findings on this topic and how to more effectively care for these children. Needless to say, it was disturbing to watch the behavior and lack of interest and professionalism on behalf of Romania's delegates. One staffer didn't speak English and declined a translator - unlike all of the other non-speaking delegates. Both appeared bored and disinterested throughout the conference, made no effort to converse with other delegates unless they were directly approached, and either disappeared and didn't attend the seminars or left sessions early, including the final session. Their disinterested behavior was noted by all the attendees as it was so obvious. They completely missed Jacob Doek, the Chair of the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child, (who has a much more demanding schedule than they do and managed to attend all 3 days) stand up and clarify that yes, indeed, the UNCRC allows for inter-country adoption and that long-term foster care is not preferable over inter-country adoption for a child. Quite frankly, I was angry to find out later that although they didn't have the funds to cover their conference expenses for three days, they had the funds to cover their additional three day stay for sightseeing in Boston over the weekend. Obviously they considered this conference just an opportunity for a free vacation, courtesy of altruistic Americans who truly do care about the welfare of Romania's abandoned children. Sadly, it is the children they are responsible for who paid for their vacation."

Copyright © 2004-2006 Bucharest Daily News

Palme System

Google translation

Palme System

The wicked receive "hands" just in Sweden. Annette von Sydow from the Attorney General of Sweden said that judges of the Supreme Court of Stockholm decided not to extradite him Bivolaru, because it could be persecuted because of his political opinions. The reasons for that decision also shows that Bivolaru not received a fair trial and that Romania has a lot to solve to Justice and Home Affairs. Bivolaru's lawyers have filed a complaint with the ECHR which requires a series of illegalities committed the issuance of the first warrant for his arrest. Furthermore, MISA leaders sent a memorandum to the Commissioner for Enlargement Olli Rehn and Pierre Moscovici, the European Parliament's rapporteur for Romania.

testimony MISA decisive

Throughout the process of the Swedish capital Bivolaru told the magistrates that , if sent in Romania, will be killed in prison. contributors to release MISA leader and testimonies were Madalina Dumitru, and another practicing yoga, which were heard as witnesses. They told how they were mistreated by police in Romania, to support its claims yogi presenting a medical certificate. , in turn, Madalina, besides being denied all charges against her mentor revealed that he felt "as a tool in the hands of" who used it as a "puppet" to put behind bars Bivolaru. She also recounted the abuses she was subjected to MISA members and supporters and it was taken to the gynecologist by force on 1 April 2004. She also accused of the brutal behavior of the police during searches of 18 March 2004, when Yogis ashram inhabited sites were stormed by masked troops armed to the teeth. In a press release, MISA gladly welcomes fair and objective decision Swedish justice rejected the extradition request and implementation of Bivolaru the freedom of it.

ARK: Our enduring legacy in Bulgaria

Our enduring legacy in Bulgaria

Ark provided a model for foster care - now being rolled out by UNICEF across eight regions

When Ark started its programme in Bulgaria, the country had the highest rate of infant institutionalisation in Europe, with some 15,000 children living in large-scale institutions. It is estimated that only 2-4% of these children are actually orphans.

In 2006, Ark signed a partnership agreement to implement a deinstitutionalisation programme in the municipality of Stara Zagora, home to the highest number of institutionalised children in the country.

This was the first time the government had explicitly committed to the planned closure of an institution and marked a huge breakthrough for Ark and the future of childcare in Bulgaria.